ConcreteBoard

Bandwagon Central => Other Sports => Topic started by: ice grillin you on April 15, 2010, 03:00:35 PM

Title: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on April 15, 2010, 03:00:35 PM
what a farging joke this is...the pussification of america continues...i cant wait for romey rjs or some other old guy to tell me this is a good rule



But it's the taunting rule that likely will create the biggest buzz.

Currently, players who are penalized for taunting on their way to the end zone draw a 15-yard penalty on the extra point attempt, 2-point conversion attempt or the ensuing kickoff.

Beginning in 2011, live-ball penalties will be assessed from the spot of the foul and eliminate the score. Examples include players finishing touchdown runs by high-stepping into the end zone or pointing the ball toward an opponent.

Celebration penalties following a score will continue to be assessed on conversion attempts or the ensuing kickoff.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: SunMo on April 15, 2010, 03:32:12 PM
it's farging ridiculous

Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: charlie on April 15, 2010, 03:35:03 PM
Just think, in a couple of years they're going to stop keeping score as to not hurt the losers feelings.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Rome on April 15, 2010, 04:10:55 PM
It's dumb.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Drunkmasterflex on April 15, 2010, 05:07:04 PM
That is the dumbest sthein for a rule ever.  What exactly is the interpretation of "taunting"?
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on April 15, 2010, 06:17:19 PM
Quote from: charlie on April 15, 2010, 03:35:03 PM
Just think, in a couple of years they're going to stop keeping score as to not hurt the losers feelings.

But that's ok because every one will get a trophy after they run through the human tunnel that their parents will make.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on April 28, 2010, 10:32:29 PM
FOXSports has a 2011 mock draft already.  UNC's defense is gonna be sick

01 RAMS = A.J. Green (Georgia WR)
02 BUCCANEERS = Julio Jones (Alabama WR)
03 BILLS = Jake Locker (Washington QB)
04 PANTHERS = Cameron Heyward (Ohio State DE)
05 LIONS = Patrick Peterson (LSU CB)
06 JAGUARS = Ryan Mallett (Arkansas QB)
07 CARDINALS = Gabe Carimi (Wisconsin OT)
08 BROWNS = Michael Floyd (Notre Dame WR)
09 CHIEFS = Anthony Castonzo (Boston College OT)
10 PATRIOTS (from OAK) = Greg Jones (Michigan State ILB)
11 EAGLES = Marvin Austin (North Carolina DT)
12 BRONCOS = Deunta Williams (North Carolina CB)
13 TITANS = Robert Quinn (North Carolina DE)
14 SEAHAWKS = Adrian Clayborn (Iowa DL)
15 STEELERS = Jonathan Baldwin (Pitt WR)
16 BENGALS = Will Hill (Florida S)
17 taterskinS = Andrew Luck (Stanford QB)
18 BEARS = Terrance Toliver (LSU WR)
19 FALCONS = Jared Crick (Nebraska DL)
20 DOLPHINS = Allen Bailey (Miami DT)
21 TEXANS = Prince Amukamara (Nebraska CB)
22 PACKERS = Mark Ingram (Alabama RB)
23 49ERS = Greg Romeus (Pitt DE)
24 CHARGERS = Rahim Moore (UCLA S)
25 JETS = Austin Pettis (Boise State WR)
26 GIANTS = Quan Sturdivant (North Carolina ILB)
27 PATRIOTS = Mike Pouncey (Florida G/C)
28 COWBOYS = Nate Solder (Colorado OT)
29 SAINTS = Bruce Carter (North Carolina OLB)
30 COLTS = Matt Reynolds (BYU OT)
31 RAVENS = Curtis Brown (Texas CB)
32 VIKINGS = Jurrell Casey (USC DT)
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: phattymatty on April 29, 2010, 12:14:21 PM
i am currently trying to figure out a way to squeeze the psu-bama game in the day before the eagles opener.  not sure if i would be able to stay alive through that.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on April 29, 2010, 12:31:06 PM
just speak with a little twang and dont tell them you know any marlons
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Drunkmasterflex on April 29, 2010, 08:38:08 PM
I am not sure the PSU football team will be alive after that. 
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on May 10, 2010, 05:08:22 PM
Invited:
Mizzou
Nebraska
ND
Rutgers
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: DH on May 12, 2010, 12:17:42 AM
RU Rah Rah. Comin to get you Freddie..
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on May 12, 2010, 12:22:01 AM
excited for the games forcibly moved to new meadowlands and/or yankee? the big 10 isnt adding rutgers so it can play big games in central jersey.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: DH on May 12, 2010, 09:31:54 AM
Yea, OK, Toddy. The $102 million expansion will just fall by the wayside now that the Big 10 is calling.

Obviously, the Big 10 wants to expand its footprint, and with RU entering, that footprint doesn't just extend into Piscataway, dummy. With RU in the B10, the conference would now have that footprint in the NYC/Metropolitan area - regardless of whether they played at Rutgers Stadium, Yankee Stadium, New Meadowlands or anywhere for that matter.

Seriously dude - if you plan on being a bigtime sports writer, you may want to have a small idea as to what you're talking about. Just saying.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: SunMo on May 12, 2010, 09:44:05 AM
Damn, that was a spanking.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: smeags on May 12, 2010, 09:51:04 AM
on the new taunting rule, absolute bullshtein. another example of the ncaa master trying to control the player slaves.

on the big ten expansion, while i love the idea of ND and RU being invited i would've really liked to have seen pitt on that list. regardless as DH stated RU being brought in makes tremendous sense considering the NYC/metro market, which central jersey is a part of. i live close enough to beautiful trenton and know plenty of people from the general area of central NJ to realize as much as well as when i see all of the guidos sporting their yankees/mets & giants stuff there. disgusting actually but whatever so i highly doubt RU home conference games would not be played at RU stadium.  

Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on May 12, 2010, 12:35:41 PM
Quote from: Die-Hard on May 12, 2010, 09:31:54 AM
Yea, OK, Toddy. The $102 million expansion will just fall by the wayside now that the Big 10 is calling.

Obviously, the Big 10 wants to expand its footprint, and with RU entering, that footprint doesn't just extend into Piscataway, dummy. With RU in the B10, the conference would now have that footprint in the NYC/Metropolitan area - regardless of whether they played at Rutgers Stadium, Yankee Stadium, New Meadowlands or anywhere for that matter.

Seriously dude - if you plan on being a bigtime sports writer, you may want to have a small idea as to what you're talking about. Just saying.

im so sorry i didnt research rutgers stadium expansion before making fun of that loser jersey school. oh how irresponsible and thoughtless of me. im so sorry.

anyway, expansion or not, im willing to bet than some games are moved up there. perhaps not every big game, perhaps not every year. but some games will. theres too much $ to be made, especially with that new stadium. it could be some kind of non conference rutgers/nd game since we all know nd isnt joining the big 10, or it could be some useless game against a pos team like temple or something.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: DH on May 12, 2010, 01:15:11 PM
Quote from: KDS on May 12, 2010, 12:35:41 PM
....before making fun of that loser jersey school. oh how irresponsible and thoughtless of me. im so sorry.

Says the kid who went to Temple - a school where anyone with a pulse can get into. Possibly if you went to a real school such as the one in discussion, you wouldn't be stuck in zesty Brownsville.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on May 12, 2010, 01:28:37 PM
actually temple has significantly raised its academic standards over the years. i know a lot of kids who didnt get in, not that im kind of shining beacon of knowledge but the school has vastly improved since the mid 90s when you were making your decision of where to go.

also its not in central jersey, which incredibly is a worse off place than north philly.

but not to drag this pointless debate out again, jewface, i will see you the meadowlands in sunmos box for rutgers/syracuse in october 2014.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: DH on May 12, 2010, 01:57:39 PM
I've got my own box at Rutgers, but thanks anyway. I'd invite you up there for a game, but you went to Temple, so yea. Sorry.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: rjs246 on May 12, 2010, 02:00:54 PM
Will you two just kiss already?
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: SunMo on May 12, 2010, 02:02:49 PM
my favorite Todd retreat tactic is when he tries to sound smart with something that is totally wrong, somebody calls him out on it, then he acts as if the topic is stupid and he doesn't really care.

hey jew, that "loser Jersey school" is about 100 steps up from what you're covering is mexicoville, texas.  i wouldn't shtein on anything right now.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: smeags on May 12, 2010, 02:24:18 PM
Quote from: KDS on May 12, 2010, 01:28:37 PM


also its not in central jersey, which incredibly is a worse off place than north philly.


epic fail.

why ?

1- because it's simply not true.

2- because someone from philly's south central, aka cheltenham should know better.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: smeags on May 12, 2010, 02:35:09 PM
so anywho, DH, do you foresee RU jumping on the invite ? IMo they should be all over it. the exposure would help them in many ways including recruitting. which in turn would probably hurt PSU.  :-\
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on May 12, 2010, 02:39:29 PM
I hear that Mizzou and Nebraska are the 2 front runners to join the Big 10.  My question is, should this happen, does the Big 10 become the Big 12 and the Big 12 become the Big 10?

LOL @ jew on jew crime.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: smeags on May 12, 2010, 02:41:56 PM
Quote from: Sgt PSN on May 12, 2010, 02:39:29 PM
jew on jew crime.

har
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on May 12, 2010, 02:42:46 PM
Quote from: SunMo on May 12, 2010, 02:02:49 PM
my favorite Todd retreat tactic is when he tries to sound smart with something that is totally wrong, somebody calls him out on it, then he acts as if the topic is stupid and he doesn't really care.

hey jew, that "loser Jersey school" is about 100 steps up from what you're covering is mexicoville, texas.  i wouldn't shtein on anything right now.

when do i ever try and sound smart, johnny cakes?
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: SunMo on May 12, 2010, 02:44:47 PM
when talking about tv, temple sports, and the inside of ovens.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on May 12, 2010, 02:47:47 PM
Quote from: SunMo on May 12, 2010, 02:44:47 PM
when talking about ..... the inside of ovens.

Nice burn. 
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: DH on May 12, 2010, 02:49:24 PM
As proud as I am of the steps the program has taken over the last 5 years, you've gotta remember where they came from. This is a team that won 1 or 2 games a year, year after year until Schiano came over from Miami..They lost to New Hampshire and Buffalo at home during his first year, not to mention losing 80-7 to WVU, among a bevy of other embarrassing loses to schools who shouldnt have even had enough students to field teams. To get an invite to the Big 10 only 5 years after the schools first bowl appearance in 30 years is something no one affiliated with RU thought would ever happen, and an opportunity they must and will jump on.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on May 12, 2010, 03:06:36 PM
im all for it, actually

the only way temple can get into a bcs conference is if there is a massive shakeup and we fall ass backwards into a 16 team acc or something. our ad is a drunk and our football program is....yea. not a great resume but if a bunch of crazy stuff goes down it might just happen without anyone at temple being able to farg it up.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: smeags on May 12, 2010, 03:54:32 PM
Quote from: Die-Hard on May 12, 2010, 02:49:24 PM
As proud as I am of the steps the program has taken over the last 5 years, you've gotta remember where they came from. This is a team that won 1 or 2 games a year, year after year until Schiano came over from Miami..They lost to New Hampshire and Buffalo at home during his first year, not to mention losing 80-7 to WVU, among a bevy of other embarrassing loses to schools who shouldnt have even had enough students to field teams. To get an invite to the Big 10 only 5 years after the schools first bowl appearance in 30 years is something no one affiliated with RU thought would ever happen, and an opportunity they must and will jump on.

would make for some fiesty tailgate discussions about upcoming RU vs PSU games.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: SunMo on June 09, 2010, 06:06:26 PM
espn saying nebraska to the Big 10 is a done deal
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Rome on June 09, 2010, 06:51:10 PM
Quote from: smeags on May 12, 2010, 03:54:32 PM
would make for some fiesty tailgate discussions about upcoming RU vs PSU games.

lol
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on June 09, 2010, 06:55:55 PM
Just testing it out:

Nuck Febraska!


Nah.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Rome on June 09, 2010, 07:33:04 PM
Ruck Futgers!
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: DH on June 10, 2010, 12:03:19 AM
USC gets 2 year postseason ban. Good..lane kiffin pisses me off.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: phillymic2000 on June 10, 2010, 12:50:04 AM
Quote from: SunMo on June 09, 2010, 06:06:26 PM
espn saying nebraska to the Big 10 is a done deal

fuuck Nebraska!!!!!!111

ireally dont care aboiurt Nebraskja
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Rome on June 10, 2010, 12:51:41 AM
USC gets a two year ban and douchebag Pete Carroll gets the Seahawks.

USC wins.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on June 10, 2010, 02:42:45 AM
Kiffen and the boys open here in August.  I hope the Aloha Stadium crowd heckles the shtein out of him but unfortunately 3/4 of the crowd will be Trojan fans.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on June 10, 2010, 02:46:36 AM
Masoli, farging genius.  What a fall from Pac 10 Champs, Rose Bowl, Hiesman hopeful to shtein.

http://content.usatoday.com/communities/campusrivalry/post/2010/06/oregon-kicks-qb-jeremiah-masoli-off-team-after-second-arrest/1 (http://content.usatoday.com/communities/campusrivalry/post/2010/06/oregon-kicks-qb-jeremiah-masoli-off-team-after-second-arrest/1)
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on June 10, 2010, 05:43:41 PM
Colorado to PAC-10 - done
Nebraska to Big Ten - done

Okla, Okla St, Texas, Texas Tech, Texas A&M to PAC-10 - rumor
Texas and Texas A&M to Big Ten - new rumor (http://www.kctv5.com/sports/23860558/detail.html)

Texas dun gunna kick mah Penn State boyz azzes.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on June 10, 2010, 06:18:50 PM
Anything that makes PSU look as pathetic as they are is good enough for me. It's a second rate university for people not smart enough to make it into Penn, Temple, and Nova and they never have any legit competition in that conference. I hope Texas comes in and they hover around .500 for the foreseeable future until they get a real coach in there with fresh ideas.

lol, I can't wait to see Paterno's little option offense against Texas.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: SD on June 10, 2010, 06:23:20 PM
Quote from: King Cole on June 10, 2010, 06:18:50 PM
It's a second rate university for people not smart enough to make it into Penn, Temple, and Nova

lol

your dumbest post ever
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on June 10, 2010, 06:27:21 PM
Temple is better academically than PSU on almost every level. Temple also has better programs in pretty much every field.

If you don't believe me, look it up.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Rome on June 10, 2010, 06:43:55 PM
Quote from: King Cole on June 10, 2010, 06:27:21 PM
Temple is better academically than PSU on almost every level. Temple also has better programs in pretty much every field.

If you don't believe me, look it up.

Penn State is ranked 47th in the entire country by US News & World Report.

Temple isn't even ranked.

You = teh stupid.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: SD on June 10, 2010, 06:48:44 PM
Quote from: King Cole on June 10, 2010, 06:27:21 PM
Temple is better academically than PSU on almost every level. Temple also has better programs in pretty much every field.

If you don't believe me, look it up.

Ok

US News ranked the top 400 college/university/schools worldwide:
Penn State #120 (http://www.usnews.com/articles/education/worlds-best-universities/2010/02/25/worlds-best-universities-top-400.html?PageNr=3)

Temple = Didn't make the list

I was more lol'ing because you lumped Temple in with a top 10 world school in Penn and Nova (which I also couldn't find on the list). But Penn State is widely regarded as an academically and athletically superior school.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Rome on June 10, 2010, 06:51:14 PM
47th in the country.  Fo-tee-se-vunth!
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on June 10, 2010, 07:24:07 PM
But Temple will groom you for an exciting career in south Texas sportswriting!
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Diomedes on June 10, 2010, 08:04:00 PM
What does academics have to do with college football anyway?
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on June 10, 2010, 08:16:34 PM
nothing...but the ncaa and its presidents love to pretend that holding up a conferences academic standard matters when inviting new members....its all bullshtein
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: SD on June 10, 2010, 08:21:28 PM
Quote from: Diomedes on June 10, 2010, 08:04:00 PM
What does academics have to do with college football anyway?

Playbooks
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: phattymatty on June 10, 2010, 09:30:13 PM
Quote from: King Cole on June 10, 2010, 06:18:50 PM
It's a second rate university for people not smart enough to make it into Penn, Temple, and Nova and they never have any legit competition in that conference.


haha. i think someone's guidance counselor was trying to make them fell better about going to school.

psu is one of the top 20 in the country in both engineering and communications.  at least they were a few years ago.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: SD on June 10, 2010, 09:34:36 PM
I thought it was funny he acted like Temple was some hard school to get into. It's basically the 4 year equivalent of Philadelphia Community College.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on June 10, 2010, 09:41:49 PM
temples a solid school over all on par with penn state...theres no discernable difference...really most four year colleges save the very best of the best are essentially equivalent...its all about what you are going for...temple is better than penn state for example in law and broadcasting...penn state better in engineering and horticulture

where penn state has an advantage over temple is in its size...better connections because of his monsterous alumni base...but if you go to each school and get a general studies degree the person who went to penn state is not coming out any smarter than the person who went to temple

like i said unless youre talking ivy league duke mit ect...its really silly to argue over what school is "better"
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on June 10, 2010, 11:12:09 PM
I just like to bash Penn State. Temple has gotten better though. It has a good programs that are superior to Penn State like business, pharmaceutical, and others.

Penn State is a shoe-in to get into though. All you need to do is attend one of their lowly satellite campuses like Abington and you get right into Penn State.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on June 10, 2010, 11:25:29 PM
the only reason temple is better than psu is location

otherwise its basically the same school that is a better fit for each person depending on their major

or you could be some 50 year old MA who hasnt been in the philly area in 30 years and hangs on to out-dated cliches and assumptions that his parents told him
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: SD on June 10, 2010, 11:30:15 PM
 
Quote from: King Cole on June 10, 2010, 11:12:09 PM
Penn State is a shoe-in to get into though. All you need to do is attend one of their lowly satellite campuses like Abington and you get right into Penn State.

I'm guessing that's a backhanded comment for me, but just remember, my degree will say "Penn State" regardless of what campus I attend.

Quote from: KDS on June 10, 2010, 11:25:29 PM
otherwise its basically the same school that is a better fit for each person depending on their major

Pretty much, there are a lot of students at the Abington campus who've went to Temple and have stated the same thing. Unless it's ivy league you're basically learning the same crap.

I mean, I was inducted into the Penn State honor society June 12th, so what's that tell you?
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on June 10, 2010, 11:38:52 PM
I had no idea what school you attended.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on June 10, 2010, 11:49:53 PM
actually 2 years at psu, 2 years at temple is a great fit if you can pull it off

you get the best of both worlds (real college atmosphere then 20s city living), spend your first 2 years binge drinking and acting a fool in the middle of nowhere, then get down to business in the big city. plus you get to lay claim to psu football and temple hoops. boom.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on June 11, 2010, 12:00:46 AM
I'm one year UNC, 3 years Temple, one year LSE for grad school.

The only years of college I enjoyed were Temple and it's easily the weakest of the 3 schools.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: QB Eagles on June 11, 2010, 12:15:44 AM
Quote from: SD on June 10, 2010, 11:30:15 PMUnless it's ivy league you're basically learning the same crap.

I graduated Ivy League and it's the same crap there too. In fact I thought I learned significantly more from the professors at grad school, when I went to a state school.

For undergrad, you can learn just about anything just about anywhere. Beyond that it's just reputation, networking, and signaling to prospective employers. A lot of the trappings of higher ed are a bit of a scam, anyway. There are many less costly (in money and time) ways to educate yourself in a field; the problem is coming up with the piece of paper that supposedly certifies what you know and can do. You're paying for having yourself linked to the reputation of the school on the paper more than you're paying for the instruction.

These days, many people basically decide their school on the non-education-related stuff anyway: the climate, the parties, the sports, the dorms, the relative quality of the Hoyda. Can't blame 'em when the primary function of so many of these schools is day care for coddled 20 year olds not emotionally mature enough for the workforce.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: SD on June 11, 2010, 08:12:11 AM
Not to hijack this thread but which ivy league school did you graduate from QB? I was all but accepted to get into Penn but didn't pursue it.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Rome on June 11, 2010, 08:20:08 AM
I went to a state college and discovered my lifelong love of puns there.  And I memorized my social security number.

Not bad for $25K!
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: rjs246 on June 11, 2010, 08:44:02 AM
I can say without a shadow of a doubt that I was more academically challenged in High School than I was at Penn State. It's possible that that is a function of the high school I went to many of my hs friends went to much better schools than I did and say the exact same thing, and the hs we went to is considered one of the best in the country.

But ultimately my conclusion is that undergraduate studies have become a joke. Graduate school seems to be the standard by which 'higher learning' is defined these days. Except for MBA programs, those are farging laughable.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on June 11, 2010, 09:43:38 AM
Back to football, anyone? (http://www.sportingnews.com/college-football/article/2010-06-09/nebraska-could-be-first-domino-summer-madness)
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: rjs246 on June 11, 2010, 09:58:10 AM
I have to admit I don't find any of this college football conference realignment remotely interesting. I keep trying to care and I keep failing miserably.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on June 11, 2010, 02:32:06 PM
back to football and TEMPLE

- 2013 @ psu, 2014 @ linc, 2015 @ psu. they play next year @ the linc and im pretty sure are back in psu in 2012. its a good game to play for both sides.
- close to a 4 year, 2 homes games each series with rutgers starting in a few years. ITS ON JEWHARD.
- notre dame called temple and wants to set something up should they remain independent. they like playing east coast games and probably figure this is one they can win.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: DH on June 11, 2010, 06:20:33 PM
RU takes all 4
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on June 11, 2010, 11:35:37 PM
Quote from: Die-Hard on June 11, 2010, 06:20:33 PM
RU takes all 4

NO.

what the chances the big 10 goes to 16? isnt everyone gonna try and copy the pac 10 model? if the acc goes to 16 they are gonna want temple, cause it dont get much more attractive than us.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on June 12, 2010, 10:22:15 AM
Philly TV market!
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on June 14, 2010, 12:44:42 PM
Mike Hunt loves the Nebraska/Big Ten move. (http://www.jsonline.com/sports/96115134.html)
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on June 14, 2010, 12:46:52 PM
all things considered i dont think theres a better team than nebraska for the big ten...including notre dame
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Drunkmasterflex on June 14, 2010, 12:50:38 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on June 14, 2010, 12:46:52 PM
all things considered i dont think theres a better team than nebraska for the big ten...including notre dame

Agreed, Is the Big Ten still looking to add other teams? I haven't heard anything since the addition of Nebraska.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on June 14, 2010, 12:57:17 PM
im pretty sure they want rutgers, syracuse, notre dame and one other

they could always add mizzou once the 5 other teams leave the big 12 and kansas does what it wants, possibly bringing kansas st along for the ride. that would leave mizzou, baylor and iowa st hanging out and at that point its every man for himself.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on June 14, 2010, 01:03:14 PM
theres no reason to take rutgers and syracuse....they would take only one of those and replace the other with md who they really want for the dc and balt markets
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on June 14, 2010, 01:06:59 PM
so youre telling me all the reports are wrong and they dont want at least a part of the ny market?

i dont doubt them going after maryland, too. that makes a lot of sense (it would also open up a spot, maybe a couple, in the acc and i know of one free agent philly school that would be an ideal fit).
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on June 14, 2010, 01:24:14 PM
Quote from: KDS on June 14, 2010, 01:06:59 PM
so youre telling me all the reports are wrong and they dont want at least a part of the ny market?

i hope you have a REALLY good editor...cause this is like the 100th time ive posted something...you read it....then you responded with something completely off the wall and not even close to anything i said
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on June 14, 2010, 01:35:16 PM
the day i dont read the first two words of your posts and then just assume is the day i admit that what you say matters

also, to clarify, simply adding syracuse doesnt give them the ny market. youd assume theyd want to eventually get to 16, so why not both? if they are content with 14, then yes, one of rutgers/cuse (most likely rutgers) and md is a logical fit.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on June 14, 2010, 01:40:24 PM
Notre Dame will end up in the Big Ten, eventually.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on June 14, 2010, 01:44:42 PM
so its likely they get to 14, then go to 16 whenever notre dame mans up and gets into a conference?
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on June 14, 2010, 02:13:48 PM
they obviously believe syracuse has a chance to deliver the nyc market or they wouldnt even be a blip on the radar much less a serious candidate...they add absolutely nothing else of importance
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: SunMo on June 14, 2010, 03:16:19 PM
They add a pretty good basketball program.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on June 14, 2010, 03:20:00 PM
basketball is almost irrelevant in this mix...it might be a tiebreaker type thing...like if they thought rutgers and syracuse would both equally deliver ny then syracuse might get the offer cause of basketball...but id say basketball is even lower than academics
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on June 14, 2010, 03:46:54 PM
yea

why else is kansas being left in the dust in favor of texas tech?
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on June 14, 2010, 03:58:45 PM
Reports are now saying that the Big 12 may get a new TV deal good enough to keep the remaining teams intact.  So, there is a very real chance that the 2011 season will see a 12-team Big Ten and a 10-team Big 12.  Nifty.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on June 14, 2010, 04:01:03 PM
texas gets its own tv deal to go on top of the big 12 deal, gets more than okla, osu and tech who get more than everyone else. weighted tv contracts is how they keep the big 12 alive....i wonder now if the pac 10 goes to plan b and tries to get sdsu, fresno, new mexico and idaho or something
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on June 17, 2010, 01:10:10 PM
todd/jewhard part II


@ army oct. 2 2010
@ temple Nov. 19 2011
@ army nov. 17, 2012
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on July 23, 2010, 11:40:52 AM
besides the Soldier Field game in 2012, ND and Miami will now also have a home-and-home in 2016-17
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: DH on July 23, 2010, 11:54:32 AM
Quote from: KDS on June 17, 2010, 01:10:10 PM
todd/jewhard part II


@ army oct. 2 2010

I'd ask if you were comin up to WP for the game, but yea, I know my answer already.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on July 23, 2010, 11:57:12 AM
if i was living in philly:

NO

now:

logistically impossible
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on July 27, 2010, 05:33:39 PM
i got the atholton preview mag today and was making myself a composite schedule

check out week two...awesome all day/nite game watch fest at a bar leading into sunday tailgate for the birds opener

fla st. - ok
mich - ND
mia - osu
ore - tenn
penn st - bama
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Drunkmasterflex on July 27, 2010, 05:46:21 PM
Man it doesn't get much better than that. 
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on July 28, 2010, 10:08:13 AM
temple and ohio the two best teams in the mac this year face off the second to last week of the season on a friggin TUESDAY!!

how farging stupid
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Rome on July 28, 2010, 10:14:03 AM
If Temple & Ohio played and no one cared would it still count as a football game?
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on July 28, 2010, 10:20:43 AM
i care

cant believe thats not enough for you
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on July 28, 2010, 10:51:22 AM
No, you don't.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on August 04, 2010, 01:37:06 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4GJVxFP19Gs&feature=player_embedded#!
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Drunkmasterflex on August 04, 2010, 04:53:37 PM
How in the farg did you find that? That made my eyes and ears bleed.  I knew there was a reason I never wanted to go back to Georgia. 
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: rjs246 on August 04, 2010, 04:59:16 PM
Oh my god.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on August 04, 2010, 05:23:49 PM
Haha

Everyone needs to experience that video. Just let it happen naturally.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Drunkmasterflex on August 04, 2010, 05:27:21 PM
You sound like a guy trying to get his girlfriend to try anal for the first time.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on August 09, 2010, 03:27:37 PM
All hail king Joe (http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/columns/story?columnist=wojciechowski_gene&page=wojciechowski/100805&sportCat=ncf)
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Rome on August 09, 2010, 03:41:15 PM
Quote from: Drunkmasterflex on August 04, 2010, 05:27:21 PM
You sound like a guy trying to get a girlfriend for the first time.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on August 12, 2010, 02:05:06 PM
New 2nd favorite team: UCF (http://guyism.com/2010/08/ucf-alum-shanna-mclaughlin-gets-naughty-in-the-locker-room.html)
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Drunkmasterflex on August 12, 2010, 03:50:12 PM
That would be a much better orientation video.  :drool
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: SD on August 12, 2010, 07:25:26 PM
Terrell Brown, 6 '11 390 (http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/football/blog/dr_saturday/post/Terrell-Brown-may-be-the-largest-football-player?urn=ncaaf-262065)

Is solid too
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: SunMo on August 17, 2010, 12:53:43 PM
http://deadspin.com/5614905/

woman who worked for an arkansas sports radio station got fired when she wore a gators hat to a razorback press conference.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on August 18, 2010, 10:13:29 PM
more conference switching

BYU goes independent in football starting next fall and returns to the WAC in all other sports

Mountain West responded by inviting Fresno State and Nevada over from the WAC to join Boise State, leaving the WAC with only 6 football teams
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on August 20, 2010, 10:27:15 AM
Robert Bolden is the troof, son (http://espn.go.com/blog/bigten/post/_/id/14722/nuggets-from-penn-state-practice)
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on August 20, 2010, 10:47:16 AM
Paul Jones redshirted
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on August 20, 2010, 10:58:52 AM
But not Bolden.

I think that they start Pat McGroin through the Alabama game to avoid getting Bolden shellshocked.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on August 20, 2010, 11:48:52 AM
penn state could be having the worst recruiting year ever of any historically great program that isnt on probation
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on August 20, 2010, 11:50:07 AM
wost eva?
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: rjs246 on August 20, 2010, 02:19:21 PM
Ever.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on August 20, 2010, 04:35:22 PM
there was rumor going around that temple will join cusa in 2011 as a football only member, along with tcu, but it appears to have been made up

:-[
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: smeags on August 20, 2010, 04:51:08 PM
only you and bill cosby give a shtein.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: phillymic2000 on August 20, 2010, 05:57:40 PM
Quote from: smeags on August 20, 2010, 04:51:08 PM
only you and bill cosby give a shtein.

and me ;D this past year my son and I got to see Temple vs NIU in bball. it was awesome got there early and he got tons of luv from the players for rockin his Owl jersey! now Temple plays at NIU (about an hour away) in fball this year. We can't wait!!
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on August 20, 2010, 05:59:51 PM
Be forewarned: Football teams occasionally have Muslim players.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Diomedes on August 20, 2010, 06:02:06 PM
Sometimes they're even Black Muslims.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on August 20, 2010, 06:02:51 PM
It's a good night to die, phillymic.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on August 25, 2010, 01:44:38 PM
Heh.

QuoteFunny thing. What Osborne really wanted was a seamless transition from the end of his coaching career in 1997 into the AD's office, just the way Devaney had done it in the early 1970s. But the Nebraska chancellor at the time, Graham Spanier, pre-empted that plan years earlier by hiring Bill Byrne for the job in 1992. Osborne was so pleased that he went fishing -- he insisted at the time that it was a trip planned long in advance -- instead of attending Byrne's introductory news conference.

full link (http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/preview10/columns/story?columnist=forde_pat&id=5492199)

</thismayinterestonlymebutshutup>
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: SunMo on August 25, 2010, 05:06:36 PM
http://deadspin.com/5622004/
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on August 26, 2010, 11:09:31 AM
Big Ten divisions set, schedule "80%," Wisconsin and Iowa split (http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=5498692)

Someone who knows people find out more.  Now.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: smeags on August 26, 2010, 11:21:40 AM
(http://)

wait, what ?
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on August 26, 2010, 12:05:04 PM
The Big Ten will have 12 teams in 2011, split into 2 divisions.  Each team will play all teams within their division every season, plus 4 of the 6 teams in the other division on a rotating schedule.  The rumor is that Wisconsin and Iowa will be in different divisions but will have a "protected" matchup and thus play every year anyway.  The same type of thing is very possible for Michigan and Ohio State also, because it would allow them the opportunity to play in the Big Ten championship game against each other.

So if ESPN is reporting this, someone else probably has more inside info.  Find it.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: smeags on August 26, 2010, 12:12:31 PM
meh - couldnt get the text to post - i was pointing out one of the posters responding that said right now penn state/iowa is the biggest rivalry in the big ten.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on August 26, 2010, 12:17:40 PM
wait so out of the 12 games they get 10 are going to conference matchups?

does this spell the end for the penn st - temple series? motherfarger id give up 10 pizza bowls and 30 mac titles for a win over them.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on August 26, 2010, 12:24:05 PM
Quote from: KDS on August 26, 2010, 12:17:40 PM
wait so out of the 12 games they get 10 are going to conference matchups?

Are you assuming the teams are going to play with themselves?

6 teams per division = 5 games for each team to play everyone else in the division
+ 4 games against teams in other division
= 9 games against the Big Ten

There will still be 3 non-conference games every year for Penn State to schedule cupcakes like Temple and Bucks County Community College.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on August 26, 2010, 12:27:24 PM
oh ok 3 at least opens the door for temple or akron or something

but youve got to figure unless the money is too good to pass up they are done playing big time ooc games like bama, nd, etc. i mean they rarely if ever play those anyway but now the off chance is gone.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on August 26, 2010, 12:29:46 PM
I expect that they'll still have one non-conference game against a decent opponent every year, but you're right... it will be harder to fit into the schedule.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on August 26, 2010, 12:33:36 PM
penn state has uva in 2012 & 13 and rutgers in 2014 & 15
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on August 26, 2010, 12:33:53 PM
wait until they start selling temple as that "decent" opponent

then youll see
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: smeags on August 26, 2010, 12:34:20 PM
pitt please
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: DH on August 27, 2010, 10:46:19 AM
Discover will be the new title sponsor of the Orange Bowl.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on August 28, 2010, 02:40:32 AM
Not directing this at DH, but is there anything less interesting in sports than sponsorship changes?  Does anyone really pay attention to it or even care for that matter?  I've never referred to any sporting event by it's sponsored name and I think it's got to be about the worst advertising method a company can spend it's money on.  Then again, these companies must turn some sort of profit from doing it otherwise they would have stopped by now. 
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: SD on August 28, 2010, 06:10:57 AM
Quote from: Sgt PSN on August 28, 2010, 02:40:32 AM
Not directing this at DH, but is there anything less interesting in sports than sponsorship changes?  Does anyone really pay attention to it or even care for that matter?  I've never referred to any sporting event by it's sponsored name and I think it's got to be about the worst advertising method a company can spend it's money on.  Then again, these companies must turn some sort of profit from doing it otherwise they would have stopped by now.  

You're getting it next tailgate:
(http://isportacus.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/f_eaglesfanm_7ef53f1.jpg)
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on August 28, 2010, 06:20:28 AM
Quote from: Sgt PSN on August 28, 2010, 02:40:32 AM
Not directing this at DH, but is there anything less interesting in sports than sponsorship changes?  Does anyone really pay attention to it or even care for that matter?  I've never referred to any sporting event by it's sponsored name and I think it's got to be about the worst advertising method a company can spend it's money on.  Then again, these companies must turn some sort of profit from doing it otherwise they would have stopped by now. 

i care only when its my team...i want a sponser that creates at least a half decent name for my stadium....the bank and linc good...the wock fu center and whatever wells fargo bad
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on August 28, 2010, 03:43:07 PM
Quote from: SD on August 28, 2010, 06:10:57 AM
Quote from: Sgt PSN on August 28, 2010, 02:40:32 AM
Not directing this at DH, but is there anything less interesting in sports than sponsorship changes?  Does anyone really pay attention to it or even care for that matter?  I've never referred to any sporting event by it's sponsored name and I think it's got to be about the worst advertising method a company can spend it's money on.  Then again, these companies must turn some sort of profit from doing it otherwise they would have stopped by now. 

You're getting it next tailgate:
(http://isportacus.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/f_eaglesfanm_7ef53f1.jpg)

Which is exactly why I threw that little disclaimer out there. 
Quote from: ice grillin you on August 28, 2010, 06:20:28 AM

Quote from: Sgt PSN on August 28, 2010, 02:40:32 AM
Not directing this at DH, but is there anything less interesting in sports than sponsorship changes?  Does anyone really pay attention to it or even care for that matter?  I've never referred to any sporting event by it's sponsored name and I think it's got to be about the worst advertising method a company can spend it's money on.  Then again, these companies must turn some sort of profit from doing it otherwise they would have stopped by now. 

i care only when its my team...i want a sponser that creates at least a half decent name for my stadium....the bank and linc good...the wock fu center and whatever wells fargo bad

Sporting event dook, not arena.  But I agree though, if my teams have to play in a stadium that has a corporate sponsor, then I'd prefer for it to have a name that has good flow or is somewhat relevant to the city/teams.  I still wish the Eagles/Phils would have gone in the same direction as teams like the Broncos or Browns when it came to naming the stadiums.  Or even the Rockies, Cards or Brewers.....sure they are corporate names but are highly relevant to the team/city they play in.  Oh well.  It could be worse....at least we aren't going to games at Tampax Field or some shtein like that. 
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: SunMo on August 29, 2010, 06:17:35 PM
You care so little you write 37 paragraphs about it.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on August 30, 2010, 02:38:08 PM
somewhat entertaining "Herbie" awards (http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/preview10/news/story?id=5500472)

#1 student section WHAT
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: smeags on August 31, 2010, 12:35:55 PM
Quote from: SD on August 28, 2010, 06:10:57 AM
Quote from: Sgt PSN on August 28, 2010, 02:40:32 AM
Not directing this at DH, but is there anything less interesting in sports than sponsorship changes?  Does anyone really pay attention to it or even care for that matter?  I've never referred to any sporting event by it's sponsored name and I think it's got to be about the worst advertising method a company can spend it's money on.  Then again, these companies must turn some sort of profit from doing it otherwise they would have stopped by now.  

You're getting it next tailgate:
(http://isportacus.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/f_eaglesfanm_7ef53f1.jpg)

:-D - god this still brings a smile ear to ear.

just look at the dipshtein's face .... plus you gotta give the picture taker some credit, great work. i actually thought DH was going to clock one of the old ladies behind us at the skins game like this.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: smeags on August 31, 2010, 12:37:46 PM
btw - watched the airing of the psu/miami feista bowl last night. man what a farging game that was. still remember that night and the bottle of jack that was consumed and the mayhem afterwards.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on August 31, 2010, 07:52:04 PM
I remember when I was looking online that morning for game re-caps and whatnot and stumbled upon that picture. A true holy shtein moment.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on September 01, 2010, 02:09:25 PM
More details of Big Ten alignment (http://sports.espn.go.com/ncaa/news/story?id=5519832)

I hope PSU gets an annual crossover game against someone like Nebraska or Iowa, not MSU.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: SunMo on September 01, 2010, 03:17:54 PM
there was a 50/50 chance for penn state to be in the Big Ten championship game each year, and they lost
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Diomedes on September 01, 2010, 04:56:05 PM
Iowa center Josh Koeppel on scooter vs. F150 yesterday morning

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZBktBPnjPo&feature=player_embedded

he's alright
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: SunMo on September 01, 2010, 05:01:39 PM
see how farging high his shoe flew?

awesome
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on September 01, 2010, 07:41:09 PM
Holy shtein!
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on September 01, 2010, 08:50:17 PM
Interesting points here (http://espn.go.com/blog/BigTen/post/_/id/15193/my-take-on-big-ten-divisions-schedules)

-starts with an eight-game conference schedule and only one non-division "protected crossover"
-Protected crossovers: Michigan-Ohio State, Penn State-Nebraska, Minnesota-Wisconsin, Northwestern-Illinois, Purdue-Iowa, Michigan State-Indiana.

Also, OMGBRANDONGRAHAM!
(http://a.espncdn.com/photo/2010/0901/ncf_a_ohiost11_576.jpg)
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on September 01, 2010, 09:20:03 PM
actually there isnt anything remotely interesting about the big ten
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: smeags on September 02, 2010, 08:11:18 AM
Quote from: FastFreddie on September 01, 2010, 08:50:17 PM
Interesting points here (http://espn.go.com/blog/BigTen/post/_/id/15193/my-take-on-big-ten-divisions-schedules)

-starts with an eight-game conference schedule and only one non-division "protected crossover"
-Protected crossovers: Michigan-Ohio State, Penn State-Nebraska, Minnesota-Wisconsin, Northwestern-Illinois, Purdue-Iowa, Michigan State-Indiana.

Also, OMGBRANDONGRAHAM!
(http://a.espncdn.com/photo/2010/0901/ncf_a_ohiost11_576.jpg)

nice
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: DH on September 02, 2010, 09:55:51 AM
Quote from: Sgt PSN on August 28, 2010, 02:40:32 AM
Not directing this at DH, but is there anything less interesting in sports than sponsorship changes? 

It's what I do for a living, so eat my balls.

Punches for all.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on September 02, 2010, 10:20:31 AM
Quote from: Die-Hard on September 02, 2010, 09:55:51 AM
Quote from: Sgt PSN on August 28, 2010, 02:40:32 AM
Not directing this at DH, but is there anything less interesting in sports than sponsorship changes? 

It's what I do for a living, so eat my balls.

Punches for all.

Who sponsored this post? 
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: DH on September 02, 2010, 10:22:14 AM
This post was brought to you by Lance Armstrong and Livestrong bracelets. If you're going to get punched in the face, make sure that incoming fist has a livestong bracelet firmly affixed. Oh, and no cancer.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: DH on September 02, 2010, 11:01:20 AM
Not sure if this has been posted in past years, but this is my annual bible I keep onhand at all times.  (http://www.collegefootballhelmetschedule.com/)
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on September 02, 2010, 02:42:45 PM
i dont know if anyone else cares about it but cfb is my favorite sport...so excited for the kickoff weekend

some highlites (and dont forget gameday starts at 9am this year on the U....hosted by the goddess erin andrews


tonight

marshall at ohio state - 8pm - big ten network
pitt at utah - 8:30 - versus
usc at hawaii - 11:00 - espn

saturday

youngstown at psu - noon - big ten network
uconn at michigan - 3:30 - abc
purdue at nd - 3:30 - nbc
wash st at okie st - 7:00 - fox sports
wash at byu - 7:00 - cbs college sports
ore st at tcu - 7:45 - espn
lsu vs nc - 8:00 - abc
cincy at fresno - 10:00 - espn2
wisky at unlv - 11:00 - vrsus

sunday

smu at texas tech - 3:30 - espn

monday

navy vs md - 4:00 - espn
boise st vs virginia tech - 8:00 - espn
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on September 02, 2010, 02:47:51 PM
also coverage maps  http://www.hdsportsguide.com/news/2010/espn-on-abc-college-football-map-for-september-4/


and i noticed jeremy bloom is an announcer for espn
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: SunMo on September 02, 2010, 02:50:46 PM
south carolina plays UNC tonight on ESPN at 7:30 right?
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Munson on September 02, 2010, 02:52:59 PM
(http://www.inewscatcher.com/timages/0b0051d81a1d698337c50fcb1a742425.jpg)
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on September 02, 2010, 02:56:27 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on September 02, 2010, 02:42:45 PM
tonight

marshall at ohio state - 8pm - big ten network
pitt at utah - 8:30 - versus
usc at hawaii - 11:00 - espn

saturday

youngstown at psu - noon - big ten network
uconn at michigan - 3:30 - abc
purdue at nd - 3:30 - nbc
wash st at okie st - 7:00 - fox sports
wash at byu - 7:00 - cbs college sports
ore st at tcu - 7:45 - espn
lsu vs nc - 8:00 - abc
cincy at fresno - 10:00 - espn2
wisky at unlv - 11:00 - vrsus

sunday

smu at texas tech - 3:30 - espn

monday

navy vs md - 4:00 - espn
boise st vs virginia tech - 8:00 - espn

Quote from: ice grillin you on September 01, 2010, 09:20:03 PM
actually there isnt anything remotely interesting about the big ten
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on September 02, 2010, 03:00:05 PM
temple nova is on the espn internet channel

i dont know if its today or tomorrow

also i dont know if anyone cares. i sort of do.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: SunMo on September 02, 2010, 03:01:21 PM
i would care if i wouldn't be driving.  not enough to watch it on the computer when i was at home.

and it's tomorrow night.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: phattymatty on September 02, 2010, 03:01:26 PM
i haven't had cable for about 6 months now but don't see any way i can go through college football and basketball seasons without it.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on September 02, 2010, 03:05:05 PM
Quote from: SunMo on September 02, 2010, 03:01:21 PM
i would care if i wouldn't be driving.  not enough to watch it on the computer when i was at home.

and it's tomorrow night.

either way ill be at a football game and my two isps (sprint and time warner) arent part of the espn 3 internet thing. so....whatever. the only big game is the penn st game. that one i need to watch.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on September 02, 2010, 03:31:02 PM
Quote from: SunMo on September 02, 2010, 02:50:46 PM
south carolina plays UNC tonight on ESPN at 7:30 right?

unc - lsu is the national game sat nite

sc plays southern miss tonight
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on September 02, 2010, 03:48:19 PM
UNC was gonna have a sick defense this year but half of them aren't allowed to play

I like the first month when you get to see matchups outside the usual conference ones, but there's a lot of "here's your $1M to take it up the ass!" ones mixed in

Also not sure if this was shown yet, but check out Eastern Washington's blood turf

(http://www.vancouversun.com/sports/3410508.bin?size=620x400)
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on September 02, 2010, 04:13:41 PM
Colin Cowturd's alma mater!
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: DH on September 02, 2010, 04:53:02 PM
Boise is better
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on September 02, 2010, 09:37:50 PM
jordan wynn is good
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on September 02, 2010, 11:06:09 PM
setting up to be a great ending in utah
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on September 03, 2010, 06:25:09 AM
Pitt learned why you schedule a cupcake warmup game to start the season, not angry Mormons.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on September 03, 2010, 08:09:50 PM
farging temple nova going down to the wire and espnu has a god damn hs football game on
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on September 03, 2010, 08:13:30 PM
got it on espn3....nova about to kick a 41 yard fg for the lead with 1:40 left
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on September 03, 2010, 08:18:41 PM
been following on my phone

dont even know what to say

its one thing when were a joke its another thing coming off a bowl game and picked to win the mac

al golden sucks. there. he does. he can recruit but he cant coach and i dont even care if they win this game they are pathetic for going to the wire with nova.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on September 03, 2010, 08:22:09 PM
what a run
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on September 03, 2010, 08:23:35 PM
holy shtein

fight fight cherry and white
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on September 03, 2010, 08:26:42 PM
loser, this was pathetic

but its nice to beat those main line snobs
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on September 03, 2010, 08:27:29 PM
mayors cup son.....respect it
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Susquehanna Birder on September 03, 2010, 09:17:51 PM
I was following via the gameday thing. Wish I could have watched the actual game on TV.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on September 03, 2010, 09:53:35 PM
getting temple athletics to do something sensible.....dont count on it
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on September 03, 2010, 09:56:23 PM
temple last second win vs nova or mac brethren toledo down 21-2 at half to arizona

who gets the nod right now?
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: DH on September 04, 2010, 09:43:48 AM
erin looks scrumptious
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on September 04, 2010, 12:18:23 PM
always...but today her boobies looked extra big....perhaps an upgrade to go along with her new hosting gig
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on September 06, 2010, 06:57:54 PM
eight players in the md navy game have more than 50 yards rushing
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on September 06, 2010, 07:02:18 PM
why does md football play tougher ooc games than md hoops
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on September 06, 2010, 07:04:24 PM
i dont know but this game is awesome

4th and goal at the goaline

theyve run for like a 1000 yards this game...how do you not go for it...at the same time you could be skewered if you dont make it
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on September 06, 2010, 07:05:55 PM
md just gave temple a home and home, i think 2 sets actually. gotta like the balls to go and play a pos mac team on the road straight up.

but yea this is a great game. how great is college football.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on September 06, 2010, 08:03:15 PM
holy shtein va techs jerseys are an abortion

what a scene tho....the stadium is literally shaking....chills
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: DH on September 06, 2010, 09:10:40 PM
boises threads are hot..so is austin pettis. farg the bcs.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on September 06, 2010, 11:17:28 PM
This game is living up to all the hype.  Feel like I'm watching a BCS bowl game.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on September 07, 2010, 05:56:16 AM
By the way, both teams had coat hanger abortion-bad uniforms.  Anyone who says otherwise likes butt sex.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Rome on September 07, 2010, 07:23:12 AM
Quote from: FastFreddie on September 07, 2010, 05:56:16 AM
By the way, both teams had coat hanger abortion-bad uniforms.  Anyone who says otherwise likes butt sex.

How long have you been married, bro?



Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on September 07, 2010, 07:25:51 AM
what a great game...perfect example of why cfb is easily the best sport going...only in the first week of the season can you get a game of the year...and now every wekend from here on out will have at least one game of the year

last night is also a perfect example of why a playoff would hurt cfb...game would have meant virtually nothing with a playoff in tact...without it it was basically a playoff game
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on September 07, 2010, 07:47:10 AM
Awful uniforms. Great game.

Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on September 07, 2010, 08:18:51 AM
I liked the VT helmets, the jerseys were XFL quality
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: DH on September 07, 2010, 10:04:18 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on September 07, 2010, 07:25:51 AM
last night is also a perfect example of why a playoff would hurt cfb...game would have meant virtually nothing with a playoff in tact...without it it was basically a playoff game

Right, so with the system as it is, instead now Va Tech (and probably Boise) will just end up playing in a meaningless game on Jan 1 or a few days after.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on September 07, 2010, 10:11:05 AM
probably is the key word

thing is we dont know whats gonna happen because there isnt a playoff...and thats why an entire three month regular season contains so many epic games...theres like four of them this weekend alone
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Rome on September 07, 2010, 10:20:06 AM
please don't start up again with the playoff nonsense.

i know that's what you're after here, but please don't. 

it's such a tired argument that you and the south texas version of jimmy olson get into and it clutters page after page of this thread.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Diomedes on September 07, 2010, 10:24:23 AM
ha, that guy lives to clutter these pages

are you kidding me?
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on September 07, 2010, 10:24:53 AM
CF Board Tip Of The Day: if you dont want to discuss college football dont read the college football thread.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Rome on September 07, 2010, 10:26:02 AM
i'd love to discuss college football.  i wouldn't like to watch you and mds fellate each other for hours arguing over something you've argued over repeatedly in the past.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on September 07, 2010, 10:30:25 AM
theres a war and peace sized list of things i dont want to read

wild guess how i get around it

Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Diomedes on September 07, 2010, 10:32:55 AM
hippo mating calls?
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: DH on September 07, 2010, 11:03:27 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on September 07, 2010, 10:11:05 AM
probably is the key word

thing is we dont know whats gonna happen because there isnt a playoff...and thats why an entire three month regular season contains so many epic games...theres like four of them this weekend alone

I disagee...I think if there were a playoff, and Boise lost last night it still hurts them immensly. Not as much as it would have under the BCS but a 1 loss Boise  team would end up playing a much better team than say a 2 loss SEC team in a playoff, which in turn could end their season. The entire idea that a teams season can be squashed before Labor Day is just ridiculous to me.

Edit: This weekend's schedule has all the pieces to be epic.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on September 07, 2010, 11:14:10 AM
well i disagree as i do with 99% of the population on this issue but last night was the perfect example of one of the many games that would be hurt by the institution of a playoff which is why i brought it up in the first place
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on September 07, 2010, 11:17:55 AM
should also be noted that the only teams whose season can 100% end before labor day are non bcs conference teams

but i dont have any problem with that anyway...with only a 12 game season you shouldnt be able to lose multiple games and still win a national championship

the less losses you are allowed to have the more games that mean everything
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on September 07, 2010, 11:27:28 AM
The BCS system has been an improvement in that it at least attempts to match up #1 and #2.  The problem is that you have teams like Boise State that have historically gone undefeated but are left out in favor of a team with a loss and a tougher schedule.  There is really no fair way to settle an issue like that, but the logistics of a significant playoff are hard to get around.

I still think a playoff with 8 teams could be manageable and fit within the existing bowl system to a large extent.  The team that finishes at #9 would bitch a lot, but let them eat cake.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: DH on September 07, 2010, 11:53:16 AM
Keep the BCS...Top 8 BCS teams play in a playoff...It ain't rocket science, people.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on September 07, 2010, 12:03:18 PM
Quote from: FastFreddie on September 07, 2010, 11:27:28 AM
The team that finishes at #9 would bitch a lot, but let them eat cake.

This is true, and no matter how many teams you allow into a playoff system, there's always going to be that 1 team left out who believes they should get in.  The thing about it though is that once you get out of the top 4 or 5, it's fairly easy to rank teams after that with very little grey area.  In other words, the team that's ranked 8th is almost always definitively better than the team ranked #9.  It's rarely that easy when it comes to a few teams at the top of the rankings.  That's where the playoff comes in and settles the argument on the field instead of letting a computer or a bunch of geeky writers do it. 

Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on September 07, 2010, 12:06:34 PM
theres usually only a couple teams than can legitimately claim to be the best in the country and never more than three

to allow 8 in means you should just allow 16 in...theres little difference btwn eight and 16 where as bwtn one and eight is large....this isnt cbb that has 25 teams that could win it all


Quote from: FastFreddie on September 07, 2010, 11:27:28 AM
The BCS system has been an improvement in that it at least attempts to match up #1 and #2.  The problem is that you have teams like Boise State that have historically gone undefeated but are left out in favor of a team with a loss and a tougher schedule.  There is really no fair way to settle an issue like that, but the logistics of a significant playoff are hard to get around.

this is all true and is also one of the reasons i love the current system...life aint fair sometimes and i love the drama and discussion pts it creates...its not like any other sport and that makes it special...i also like the nfls system...both are great in their own ways

nfl playoffs pawn and cfb regular season pawns...i slightly prefer the latter because college has 12 incredible weeeknds to follow where as the nfl might have 12 great games to follow
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on September 07, 2010, 12:08:06 PM
Quote from: Sgt PSN on September 07, 2010, 12:03:18 PM
Quote from: FastFreddie on September 07, 2010, 11:27:28 AM
The team that finishes at #9 would bitch a lot, but let them eat cake.

In other words, the team that's ranked 8th is almost always definitively better than the team ranked #9.  It's rarely that easy when it comes to a few teams at the top of the rankings.  


this just couldnt be farther from the truth in cfb
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on September 07, 2010, 12:13:06 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on September 07, 2010, 12:08:06 PM
Quote from: Sgt PSN on September 07, 2010, 12:03:18 PM
Quote from: FastFreddie on September 07, 2010, 11:27:28 AM
The team that finishes at #9 would bitch a lot, but let them eat cake.

In other words, the team that's ranked 8th is almost always definitively better than the team ranked #9.  It's rarely that easy when it comes to a few teams at the top of the rankings.   


this just couldnt be farther from the truth in cfb

Agreed.  Not sure where Sarge grabbed that gem.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Rome on September 07, 2010, 12:20:09 PM
i hope all of you get rickets.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on September 07, 2010, 12:31:08 PM
Quote from: FastFreddie on September 07, 2010, 12:13:06 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on September 07, 2010, 12:08:06 PM
Quote from: Sgt PSN on September 07, 2010, 12:03:18 PM
Quote from: FastFreddie on September 07, 2010, 11:27:28 AM
The team that finishes at #9 would bitch a lot, but let them eat cake.

In other words, the team that's ranked 8th is almost always definitively better than the team ranked #9.  It's rarely that easy when it comes to a few teams at the top of the rankings.   


this just couldnt be farther from the truth in cfb

Agreed.  Not sure where Sarge grabbed that gem.

Because when you compare 8 and 9, there's definitely more of a gap between them than there is between say 1 and 3.  That's not to say that the team ranked 8th is an absolute lock, but the further down the rankings you go, the easier it is to separate 1 team from another. 
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: charlie on September 07, 2010, 12:38:13 PM
Quote from: Sgt PSN on September 07, 2010, 12:31:08 PM
Quote from: FastFreddie on September 07, 2010, 12:13:06 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on September 07, 2010, 12:08:06 PM
Quote from: Sgt PSN on September 07, 2010, 12:03:18 PM
Quote from: FastFreddie on September 07, 2010, 11:27:28 AM
The team that finishes at #9 would bitch a lot, but let them eat cake.

In other words, the team that's ranked 8th is almost always definitively better than the team ranked #9.  It's rarely that easy when it comes to a few teams at the top of the rankings.   


this just couldnt be farther from the truth in cfb

Agreed.  Not sure where Sarge grabbed that gem.

Because when you compare 8 and 9, there's definitely more of a gap between them than there is between say 1 and 3.  That's not to say that the team ranked 8th is an absolute lock, but the further down the rankings you go, the easier it is to separate 1 team from another. 

I would argue that the exact opposite of that is true.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: phattymatty on September 07, 2010, 12:52:06 PM
yeah sarge is eating retard sandwiches again. how about the gap between 5-6? Larger or smaller than 1-3 or 8-9? and please show your work.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: LBIggle on September 07, 2010, 12:58:30 PM
Gaps are awesome.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on September 08, 2010, 01:08:41 AM
Quote from: Seabiscuit36 on September 07, 2010, 08:18:51 AM
I liked the VT helmets, the jerseys were XFL quality

:-D  Vince McMahon all over it.

The more I see that Boise uni the more I kind of dig it.   Hawaii last team to beat Boise in 2007.  Holy shtein.  We obviously see a lot of Boise and we didn't really ever believe they had an argument but damn I'm believing now.  The start of that game was one of the most incredible I've ever seen.  farging nuts.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on September 08, 2010, 07:23:28 AM
Quote from: Don Ho on September 08, 2010, 01:08:41 AM
Quote from: Seabiscuit36 on September 07, 2010, 08:18:51 AM
I liked the VT helmets, the jerseys were XFL quality
Hawaii last team to beat Boise in 2007.  Holy shtein.  We obviously see a lot of Boise and we didn't really ever believe they had an argument but damn I'm believing now. 

im sure you meant to say last wac team to beat them

they have actually lost to the likes of east carolina since their hawaii loss
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on September 08, 2010, 03:18:05 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on September 08, 2010, 07:23:28 AM
Quote from: Don Ho on September 08, 2010, 01:08:41 AM
Quote from: Seabiscuit36 on September 07, 2010, 08:18:51 AM
I liked the VT helmets, the jerseys were XFL quality
Hawaii last team to beat Boise in 2007.  Holy shtein.  We obviously see a lot of Boise and we didn't really ever believe they had an argument but damn I'm believing now. 

im sure you meant to say last wac team to beat them

they have actually lost to the likes of east carolina since their hawaii loss

Correct.  That was the Hawaii Bowl where Chris Johnson went off.  Still pissed as I was planning on going to that but it was xmas eve and we had to go somewhere else.  My son went and still talks about  what a beast Johnson was that day.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on September 08, 2010, 03:44:14 PM
seeing DonHo scream fatty at Weis was priceless.  Knowing his wife and JR were closer yelling, even better.  All the ND players were staying at the sheraton obviously, they had some of the best tail i saw on the island following them around
(http://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc1/hs255.snc1/10226_1232427128866_1174796304_725613_1356817_n.jpg)
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Rome on September 08, 2010, 04:24:31 PM
The Sheraton Waikiki?

I stayed there when I was a teenager.  Awesome hotel.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: rjs246 on September 08, 2010, 04:31:54 PM
I didn't know they had hotels back then. Or planes. Did you swim to Hawaii? Etc etc.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on September 08, 2010, 04:36:00 PM
i was thinking was there millionaires back then
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on September 08, 2010, 05:06:03 PM
Quote from: rjs246 on September 08, 2010, 04:31:54 PM
I didn't know they had hotels back then. Or planes. Did you swim to Hawaii? Etc etc.

He sailed over on the Ark. 
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Rome on September 08, 2010, 05:23:00 PM
I pigfarged your whore mothers and produced all of you to my ever-loving disappointment:

(http://img.listal.com/image/1283087/500full.jpg)
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on September 08, 2010, 06:27:05 PM
Seabiscuit,

Nice shot!  Damn we had some good seats.  We should have traded seats with my wife and jr and just heckled the shtein out of the Irish.  I think jr called Jimmy Clausen a cork sucker or something like that.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on September 08, 2010, 06:28:12 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on September 08, 2010, 04:36:00 PM
i was thinking was there millionaires back then

Hello?  Thurston Howell III.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on September 09, 2010, 10:20:40 AM
an unbelievable saturday....complete with a couple good late night games and we all know theres nothing better than thinking your sports day is over only to remember that you have a cfb 10:30 at night start...and actually while its not the best game of the weekend that stanford ucla match up is really interesting...ucla was supposed to have a bust out comeback year and you get to see them against andrew luck

Tonight

cent mich at temple – espnu – 7pm
auburn @ miss st – espn – 730pm

Friday

wva @ marshall – espn – 7pm
utep @ Houston – espn – 10:15pm


Saturday

georgia at south carolina – espn2 - noon

fla st @ oklahoma – abc/espn2 – 330pm
Michigan @ nd – nbc – 330pm
Miami @ ohio st – espn – 340pm

penn state @ bama – espn – 7pm
Oregon @ tenn – espn2 – 7pm

uva @ usc – fox sports net – 1030pm
stanford @ ucla – espn - 1030pm
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on September 10, 2010, 03:23:43 AM
ill give you people 1 guess what team is 2-0 and won their first overtime game ever

Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: smeags on September 10, 2010, 08:25:40 AM
good for temple. golden has really turned that program around.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on September 10, 2010, 11:15:43 AM
their first 2-0 start since '81
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on September 10, 2010, 12:12:09 PM
their first OT win since ever

beat that sucka
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on September 10, 2010, 01:40:20 PM
temple people are really bitter about this....they want that invite to the BE even though it will never happen

in fact they are holding onto their weakass contract with the linc that stipulates they can be the only college team to play home games there. that hurts nova since their stadium doesnt and cant ever meet FBS standards.

so, nova either has to go franklin field (no chance to win there) or ppl park (need to add a few seats), with ppl being the most likely option. or they could buy temple out of the linc or buy into a shared arrangement or something. im sure the temple BOT would take that $ in a heartbeat.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Rome on September 10, 2010, 02:11:38 PM
why they need handouts like bill cosby u?

they could build the taj majal of stadiums out on the main line out of petty cash.  no need to be using o-p-p.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on September 10, 2010, 02:22:21 PM
what are the requirements for a I-A stadium? 
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on September 10, 2010, 02:27:20 PM
i think 20 or 25

and no, nobody wants delaware
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: charlie on September 10, 2010, 02:28:07 PM
They could just expand their own stadium, it's in a great spot, plenty of parking (esp for the main line) and 2 regional rail stops on campus.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: SunMo on September 10, 2010, 02:49:44 PM
Quote from: Rome on September 10, 2010, 02:11:38 PM
why they need handouts like bill cosby u?

they could build the taj majal of stadiums out on the main line out of petty cash.  no need to be using o-p-p.

apparently, they have a terrible relationship with radnor township, bad enough that they couldn't even add on their existing stadium if they wanted to go that route.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Rome on September 10, 2010, 02:54:25 PM
omgtrafficjams!
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on September 10, 2010, 03:38:45 PM
Quote from: KDS on September 10, 2010, 02:27:20 PM
i think 20 or 25

and no, nobody wants delaware
you know me too well.  They're planning a new stadium across from the current one that houses 22k.  They've talked for years about it being their ultimate goal.  Nova and Delaware have pretty damn good programs, but they'll be fish out of water at the next level i think.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on September 10, 2010, 05:38:44 PM
theres not enough hs football talent in this region to support another bcs team
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Eagles_Legendz on September 11, 2010, 01:55:04 PM
Wake and Duke are tied at 35 at the half in what has been the single worst display of BCS conference football the world has ever witnessed.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Rome on September 11, 2010, 02:02:22 PM
i've been watching that game and it's been a hilarious display.  fun as hell to watch, though.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Rome on September 11, 2010, 02:05:04 PM
mmmm... krispy kreme...

Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Eagles_Legendz on September 11, 2010, 02:08:10 PM
Krispy Kreme is essentially the only thing that funds Winston-Salem.  The city is empty now since Krispy Kreme has fallen on some pretty hard times in recent years.  Their donuts are delicious though.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on September 11, 2010, 02:16:17 PM
Hawaii is spanking Army, Die Hard is crying and boarding a flight to punch Don Ho
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Rome on September 11, 2010, 02:36:53 PM
Pretty sure Die Hard is halfway between sobriety and a coma in preparation for Rutgers' game tonight at 8 against Florida Tool & Die.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: phattymatty on September 11, 2010, 02:58:37 PM
Lattimore from SC is a beast. and a true freshman.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on September 11, 2010, 03:36:21 PM
it was 20-0 when i left the house for errands in the Hawaii-Army game, hell of a comeback by Army. 
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Eagles_Legendz on September 11, 2010, 03:51:32 PM
Hokies down vs JMU.  GT lost to Kansas, and Wake-Duke scored 102 points with no OT.  Nice ACC.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: phattymatty on September 11, 2010, 04:11:00 PM
lol hokies
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on September 11, 2010, 04:21:22 PM
nice win by JMU
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Eagles_Legendz on September 11, 2010, 04:23:38 PM
I'm sure Boise fans are thrilled.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on September 11, 2010, 05:04:17 PM
6 AM to watch birds play, absolutely.  6AM to watch Hawaii/Army, farg you.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on September 11, 2010, 05:07:08 PM
miami with kick and punt returns to stay in this game
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: phattymatty on September 11, 2010, 05:47:06 PM
denard robinson is the truth.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: phattymatty on September 11, 2010, 05:51:44 PM
also, what the farg is wrong with these guys...i've seen no less than 3 desean jacksons at the one yard line today. ND dude just got away with it but he dropped the ball around the 2.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on September 11, 2010, 05:57:21 PM
Manti Te'o
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on September 11, 2010, 06:13:19 PM
Quote from: phattymatty on September 11, 2010, 05:47:06 PM
denard robinson is the truth.

He is sickly fast.  But maybe just for the slow Big Ten.  His arm is not so great, but who cares.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on September 11, 2010, 06:47:34 PM
400+ total yards for Robinson?  Holy crap.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on September 11, 2010, 06:58:37 PM
How big is that dude that just scored for Notre Dame?  He's huge!
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on September 11, 2010, 08:10:21 PM
That ND-MICH game was awesome. Robinson is a damn good player. Wow, what a game.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: SD on September 11, 2010, 08:48:44 PM
Quote from: phattymatty on September 11, 2010, 05:47:06 PM
denard robinson is the truth.

Is it just me or is it weird watching a QB with dreads?
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on September 11, 2010, 08:53:27 PM
(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_C8v6M7NC21Q/RsoI8wGxDUI/AAAAAAAAE7o/2RVEA3aYHHs/s400/michaelvick.jpg)
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: SD on September 11, 2010, 08:58:40 PM
I'm talking dreads that hang to the shoulder blades. I wouldn't know Vick had dreads unless he took his helmet off.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on September 11, 2010, 09:02:57 PM
they didnt go to his shoulders but you could see vicks in college and in atlanta at certain pts but i know what you are saying

youll probbaly never come a across one and if you did wouldnt watch but if you ever a see a meac game you might see dreads...or a swac game...by no means a lot but a good amount of qbs at small southern schools have dreads
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on September 11, 2010, 09:10:30 PM
To me, it's not smart football to be a QB and have super long dreads.   It's just giving a DE something else to grab onto while standing in the pocket. 
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on September 11, 2010, 10:31:23 PM
Oregon running away with it now.

Perhaps Tennessee needs to start worrying about football and less about how to properly take showers.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on September 11, 2010, 11:22:49 PM
A thumping in Tennessee... now 48-13, Ducks.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on September 16, 2010, 08:56:19 AM
how great is it this year that the sat nite prime time regional game you normally wouldnt get is now on espn2 for all to see

not the strongest week of the year but you get an 11:15pm sat night start - sweet

tonight

cincinnati @ nc state - espn - 730

saturday

arkansas @ uga - easpn - noon
kent state @ penn state - espn2 - noon

nebraska @ washington - abc/espon2 - 330
florida @ tenn - cbs - 330
ariz st @ wisconsin - abc/espn2 - 330
byu @ fla state - espnu - 330

miss st @ lsu - espnu - 7
clemson @ auburn - espn - 7

texas @ TT - abc/espn2 - 8
notre dame @ mich state - abc/espn2 - 8

iowa @ arizona - espn - 1030
houston @ ucla - fsn - 1030
wake forest @ syanford - espn2 - 11:15
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on September 16, 2010, 09:49:35 AM
Wolfpack gonna lose tonight.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on September 17, 2010, 03:29:34 AM
2 more years in the mac for temple

hopefully this doesnt include having to play their zesty basketball teams
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on September 17, 2010, 07:26:55 AM
man did russell wilson look like a pro qb last night...his arm is insane and he throws such a nice ball..if he can be more consistent and progress like his taklent says he should he is going to play and play well at the next level...hes got the whole package
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on September 17, 2010, 08:25:17 AM
I may have to get to some NCSU games this year.  Last night I learned...
1. Russell Wilson is actually good.
2. Cincinnati is pretty bad.
3. Vidal Hazelton plays for Cinci but is already hurt. (When did he transfer?)

Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on September 17, 2010, 08:44:41 AM
Vidal should have listened to his dad
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Eagles_Legendz on September 17, 2010, 12:23:18 PM
This is apparently not a parody:

http://www.otherteamsfans.com/2010/09/please-show-your-support/
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: smeags on September 17, 2010, 12:30:48 PM
facepalm
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on September 17, 2010, 12:53:30 PM
The most crazy Duke fans still often forget that they have a football team.  No doubt that video is real.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: smeags on September 17, 2010, 12:56:48 PM
actual game time footage of the fans in the stannds.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Eagles_Legendz on September 17, 2010, 01:07:28 PM
I can't believe the school would release a video that tells people that tickets are necessary to enter a stadium and has to use a map to show where the stadium is located.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on September 18, 2010, 03:28:23 PM
Mallet leads Arkansas right down the field for the go ahead score.  3 plays - TD.

WTF with Michigan?  Was the game that close?
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on September 18, 2010, 03:28:52 PM
temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0 temple is 3-0
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on September 18, 2010, 03:39:26 PM
Jaiquawn Jarrett was a beast again.  Great win.  And more than 5000 people showed up at the Linc....
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on September 18, 2010, 03:46:22 PM
I can't wait until next week. Temple is going to kill little overrated PSU. Overrated both athletically and academically. It's going to be fun watching Big Al and Temple roll into their stadium and send those spoiled bros who's parents paid for their education home with a reality check that Temple is THEBIGTEAM in PA.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Rome on September 18, 2010, 03:58:52 PM
lol
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on September 18, 2010, 04:22:39 PM
This year is basically Temple's best chance.  Still not happening, though.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on September 18, 2010, 05:51:14 PM
kent state is better than temple
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Rome on September 18, 2010, 05:52:13 PM
How far has Florida State fallen in terms of relevance in college football?

This thing is the PBP announcer for the game on ESPNU today:

(http://cdn0.sbnation.com/imported_assets/281161/pam_ward_medium.jpg)

Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on September 18, 2010, 06:11:59 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on September 18, 2010, 05:51:14 PM
kent state is better than temple

lol

its ON
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on September 18, 2010, 07:13:10 PM
Jake Locker probably lost a few million today.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on September 18, 2010, 07:16:39 PM
He can go cry on McShay's shoulder.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on September 18, 2010, 07:54:20 PM
Quote from: Rome on September 18, 2010, 05:52:13 PM
How far has Florida State fallen in terms of relevance in college football?

This thing is the PBP announcer for the game on ESPNU today:

(http://cdn0.sbnation.com/imported_assets/281161/pam_ward_medium.jpg)



I can't stand her.  She has done several Hawaii games.  We'd get all excited because ESPN was going to show the game and than we'd get her.  Her voice is just to he-man.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on September 18, 2010, 08:44:14 PM
Quote from: FastFreddie on September 18, 2010, 07:13:10 PM
Jake Locker probably lost a few million today.

Jake, I'd like you to meet Colt.  Colt, Jake.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Eagles_Legendz on September 18, 2010, 10:25:01 PM
Ignoring Saturday night plans to watch Wake inevitably get beaten by Stanford starting at 11:15 sounds like a great decision on my part.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Eagles_Legendz on September 19, 2010, 12:18:04 AM
Yep, poor decision.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on September 19, 2010, 05:30:06 AM
Holy shtein that game ended at what, 2:30 am EST?  I can't remember this many games on after 8 pm Hawaii time.  Payback tomorrow as we need to be at the sportsbar by 6:30 am to score a good tv as there are 9 games that kickoff at 7 am including the Steelers who have a huge following here.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Eagles_Legendz on September 19, 2010, 09:14:46 AM
Yes, ~2:30 is when it should have ended.  I turned off the TV at 41-7 in the 2nd qtr though.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: phattymatty on September 19, 2010, 09:47:43 AM
Quote from: King Cole on September 18, 2010, 03:46:22 PM
send those spoiled bros who's parents paid for their education home with a reality check that Temple is THEBIGTEAM in PA.

ha. rich kids always go with the cheapest option.

i don't even get the hate on penn state from people from smaller schools. is it because no one cares about you and that makes you mad?
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on September 19, 2010, 02:41:59 PM
Quote from: King Cole on September 18, 2010, 03:46:22 PM
send those spoiled bros who's parents paid for their education home with a reality check that Temple is THEBIGTEAM in PA.

I don't get it.  Is Temple a free school now? 
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on September 19, 2010, 10:12:35 PM
youd be best to never ever respond to anything that idiot ever says again
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on September 23, 2010, 04:34:29 PM
tonight

miami at pitt – espn – 7:30

tomorrow

tcu @ smu – espn - 8

saturday

bama @ arkansas – cbs - 330
ucla @ texas – abc/espn - 330
stanford @ notre dame – nbc - 330
temple @ penn state – bbtn - 330

okie @ cincy – espn2 - 6

south carolina @ auburn – espn - 745
oregon state @ boise – abc - 8


west virginia @ lsu – espn2 - 9


oregon @ arizona st – fsn - 10
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on September 25, 2010, 04:31:09 PM
The Weasel Bowl - Saban vs Petrino

Are there two more unlikable douchebags than these two? I would like to see Bama get knocked off but that means Petrino wins. And I hate Bobby Petrino.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Rome on September 25, 2010, 05:20:59 PM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on September 25, 2010, 04:31:09 PM
Are there two more unlikable douchebags than these two?

Donovan McNabb & Brett Myers?
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on September 25, 2010, 05:43:21 PM
Lol

Maybe Tmac and Wheels.

Or David Bell and Scott Young
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Rome on September 25, 2010, 05:48:35 PM
the arrogant condescending bean-counting scumbag who runs the eagles gets my vote.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on September 25, 2010, 06:52:51 PM
Mallett had 2 bad INTs in the last 6 minutes of the game.  He's gonna fit in great in Buffalo...
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on September 25, 2010, 07:23:31 PM
Quote from: BigEd76 on September 25, 2010, 06:52:51 PM
Mallett had 2 bad INTs in the last 6 minutes of the game.  He's gonna fit in great in Buffalo...

:-D
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on September 25, 2010, 07:26:31 PM
This Nevada team is impressive.  ESPNNEWS just cut to their game at BYU.  I thought they'd lay an egg after destroying Cal but they're up on the Later Day Saints 21-7 in the 2nd.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on September 25, 2010, 08:30:05 PM
That Boise turf is even more nasty in high def.  You can barely see the Boise players.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on September 25, 2010, 08:34:05 PM
Wish I could watch..

The one drawback of having satellite is hitting me now. A thunderstorm. After I washed my truck and wanna watch sports on the dish.

farging shtein
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on September 25, 2010, 08:39:12 PM
Yay..back on
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on September 25, 2010, 08:44:08 PM
You watching the bums on mlb network?
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on September 25, 2010, 08:45:42 PM
Nah, on the Mets feed.

What the hell is a Lucas Duda?!
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on September 25, 2010, 08:47:48 PM
More like what the farg is Chad Durbin.  Just pissed his tampon. 
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: DH on September 27, 2010, 12:48:53 PM
Temple is in for a hurtin' this week..
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on September 27, 2010, 01:44:31 PM
haha

weve actually beaten army i think 2 or 3 times in a row
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: SunMo on September 27, 2010, 01:45:12 PM
we
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on September 27, 2010, 01:54:28 PM
As an alumnus, he will be Temple for life.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on September 27, 2010, 01:56:12 PM
im pretty sure you can say we for your college, johnsmith
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on September 27, 2010, 02:03:04 PM
-h

Agreed, though.  Hence...

WE ARE! PENN STATE!
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on September 27, 2010, 02:04:06 PM
i want there to be an h

i like the h
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: SunMo on September 27, 2010, 02:05:58 PM
we think you're an idiot


we = humanity
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on September 27, 2010, 02:14:56 PM
do you think we could get an invite to chef smiths next cookout?
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Diomedes on September 27, 2010, 04:38:34 PM
bud lite lime only
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: SunMo on September 27, 2010, 04:40:03 PM
bud light

miller lite
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Diomedes on September 27, 2010, 04:44:52 PM
i really wouldn't know
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: SunMo on September 27, 2010, 04:46:23 PM
i thought you would be above being a beer snob.  i am sad now.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Diomedes on September 27, 2010, 04:53:56 PM
oh now it's snobbish to be ignorant

i don't drink light beer, what can I say
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: SunMo on September 27, 2010, 04:57:05 PM
nothing, my view of you will never be the same
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: shorebird on September 27, 2010, 09:35:56 PM
FOOTBALL TRUTHS

It's that time of the year and we need to remember a few things about some of our more famous college football teams.

(1) What does the average Univ. of Florida player get on his SATs?

Answer:  Drool. 
   
(2) What do you get when you put 32 West Virginia cheerleaders in one room?

Answer:  A full set of teeth.

(3) How do you get a Nebraska cheerleader into your dorm room?

Answer:  Grease her hips and push.

(4) How do you get an Ohio State graduate off your porch?

Answer:  Pay him for the pizza.

(5) How do you know if an Alabama football player has a girlfriend?

Answer:  There is tobacco spit on both sides of his pickup truck.

(6) Why is the Kentucky football team like a possum?

Answer:  Because they play dead at home and get killed on the road.

(7) What are the longest three years of a Texas Longhorn football player's life?

Answer:  His freshman year.

(8) How many Texas A&M freshmen does it take to change a light bulb?

Answer:  None. That's a sophomore course.   

(9) Where was O. J. Headed in the white Bronco?

Answer:  Durham, North Carolina.  He knew that the police would never look for a Heisman Trophy winner at Duke.

(10) How do you keep an Florida State University football player out of your front yard?

Answer:  Erect a goal post!

AND FINALLY (drum roll and cymbal clash)....!

(11) Why did the University of Tennessee choose orange as their team color?

Answer:  You can wear it to the game on Saturday, hunting on Sunday, and picking up trash along the highways the rest of the week.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: DH on September 28, 2010, 11:13:37 AM
Boo X 11
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Diomedes on September 28, 2010, 11:34:34 AM
My grandfather thought those jokes were tired when they were delivered to him through a vaccum office mail tube in 1963.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: DH on September 28, 2010, 03:21:23 PM
(http://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc4/hs668.snc4/60861_1571925174007_1111835494_1622815_1723458_n.jpg)
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on September 28, 2010, 03:34:54 PM
you probably won't see heisman pierce. with undefeated season out the door and this being the last non conference game, chances are he doesnt play
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: shorebird on September 28, 2010, 04:43:16 PM
Quote from: Diomedes on September 28, 2010, 11:34:34 AM
My grandfather thought those jokes were tired when they were delivered to him through a vaccum office mail tube in 1963.

ouch.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on September 30, 2010, 09:52:45 PM
no late games this week but some super games...as a penn state fan 8 pm is especially ridiculous


miami @ clemson - espn2 - noon
temple @ army - cbss - noon

texas vs okie - abc - 330
wisconsin @ michigan st - abc/espn - 330
tennessee @ lsu - cbs - 330

florida @ bama - cbs - 8
stanford @ oregon - abc/espn2 - 8
washington @ usc - espn2 - 8
nd @ bc - abc - 8
penn state @ iowa - espn - 8
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on September 30, 2010, 10:25:37 PM
More games for me to lose money on.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on October 01, 2010, 07:23:32 AM
i dont know if anyone watched it but jesus that game last night was awesome
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on October 01, 2010, 08:13:21 AM
Absolutely.

Jerrod Johnson gave that shtein away on that pick with :18

Great game
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: DH on October 01, 2010, 09:03:11 AM
Gambling is bad for you.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on October 01, 2010, 09:22:56 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on September 30, 2010, 09:52:45 PM
no late games this week but some super games...as a penn state fan 8 pm is especially ridiculous

I'm not too amped up about it.  PSU loses to Iowa at home in a good year.  This is a down year and they're in Iowa City.  Not good.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on October 01, 2010, 09:34:18 AM
the penn state game is just so so but its still penn state and combined with those two other ridiculous games the 8pm slot becomes huge
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on October 01, 2010, 08:00:14 PM
Going to the VT/NCSU game tomorrow.  I'll be the one in a Chooch road jersey.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: phillymic2000 on October 02, 2010, 02:34:21 PM
good game between Illinois and Ohio state on Big ten network. 17-10 OSU in the 4th.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: phillymic2000 on October 02, 2010, 03:09:04 PM
Farg yeah Temple!!
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: phillymic2000 on October 02, 2010, 03:13:50 PM
Matt BROWN!! Holy cripes!!
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on October 02, 2010, 03:15:56 PM
dear diehard,

hey.

-todd
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: phillymic2000 on October 02, 2010, 03:48:28 PM
Quote from: Die-Hard on September 28, 2010, 03:21:23 PM
(http://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc4/hs668.snc4/60861_1571925174007_1111835494_1622815_1723458_n.jpg)

:paranoid

:-D
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on October 02, 2010, 07:57:17 PM
and without bernard pierce, too

come bowl time temple will be 12-1 and ranked

think about that
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: DH on October 02, 2010, 08:46:48 PM
it was actually a pretty good game. and brown is pretty nasty..plus the temple cheerleaders were halfway decent so that was nice.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on October 02, 2010, 09:26:56 PM
This Oregon game is fargin nuts! If you're not watching it...turn it on!

I hope they cover.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Rome on October 02, 2010, 09:33:43 PM
i'm watching the gators get their faces stomped in.

woot!
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on October 02, 2010, 10:02:04 PM
I'm wearing my remote out

Georgia-Colorado
Penn State - Iowa
Stanford - Oregon
Alabama - Florida

LaMichael James is a fargin pimp.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on October 02, 2010, 10:44:12 PM
I hope that Georgia RB farging chokes on his mouthpiece
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on October 02, 2010, 11:12:37 PM
How small is Penn State? What a bunch of losers. I love how they refuse to adapt to real college football and continue to run this slop offense out there and always get killed by real teams. I mean, they usually can beat good Big 10 teams, but they can't even do that now. They are lucky Heisman Pierce got hurt, or else they wouldn't even be ranked right now.

Oh, and farg their spoiled ass alumni too.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on October 02, 2010, 11:37:11 PM
LaMichael James.

Wow.

Great game!

31-257-3
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on October 03, 2010, 12:38:08 PM
Words really can't express how much I loathe adding an extra syllable on the front of a name.  It's my new pet peeve. 
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Munson on October 03, 2010, 12:47:42 PM
DeSarge Jackson?
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on October 03, 2010, 12:55:21 PM
turrabull
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Rome on October 09, 2010, 06:51:32 PM
bama's gettin that ass beat by the cocks.

:flipoff you, saban.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on October 09, 2010, 07:40:03 PM
damn so bombed at work didnt even notice

awesome. saban can eat pubes.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on October 09, 2010, 10:54:15 PM
LSU-FLA game is exciting.

I don't know how FLA did not know that the idiot Les Miles was going to call a fake FG there. 53yd attempt and LSU calls a timeout right before.

They ran a Koy/Akers like flip behind the head type deal. The ball bounced and the kicker picked it up and still ran for a 1st down.

They are reviewing it to see if it was a forward lateral - looked like a good pitch to me.

Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on October 09, 2010, 10:57:56 PM
Unreal finish

LSU is going to win.

Urban Meyer looks like he's about to pass a hundred kidney stones
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Rome on October 10, 2010, 07:09:49 AM
The Seminoles curb stomped the thugs from The U last night and it was glorious.

Oh, and Florida lost too?

(Snickers)

Life is good.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on October 11, 2010, 11:57:26 AM
1. Boise State    .913
2. Oregon    .863
3. TCU    .854
4. Oklahoma    .8425
5. Ohio State    .8421
6. LSU    .782
7. Nebraska    .777
8. Auburn    .744
9. Michigan State    .642
10. Alabama    .634

igy's head would explode but tcu/boise title game would be the greatest thing in sports history. every ncaa exec would cry themselves to sleep.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on October 11, 2010, 04:41:00 PM
Except that all the experts say that Boise and TCU don't have enough on their schedule to have a snowball's chance in hell of getting into the title game.  But yes, that it what it would look like in early October.  Nice find.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on October 11, 2010, 05:37:40 PM
even if they are the only 0 loss teams?
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on October 11, 2010, 05:39:23 PM
Yes.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on October 11, 2010, 05:57:56 PM
i dont believe you
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on October 11, 2010, 06:03:59 PM
That's fair.  Did you at least take my free advice and bet on the underdog Giants tonight?
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on October 11, 2010, 06:06:52 PM
no

no i did not
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on October 11, 2010, 06:17:00 PM
Fine.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on October 14, 2010, 12:57:35 PM
Progress? (http://sports.espn.go.com/ncaa/news/story?id=5684400)
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on October 16, 2010, 06:43:41 AM
So, serious question.... Who is Die-Hard rooting for today in the Army/Rutgers game?
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: SD on October 16, 2010, 08:45:58 AM
I'd guess Rutgers. He likes to rock that LJ Smith jersey
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on October 16, 2010, 10:19:45 AM
I'd imagine he gets fired if he rocks that today.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: SD on October 16, 2010, 12:44:14 PM
He's rooting for Army.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on October 16, 2010, 07:25:16 PM
The Auburn/Arkansas game is nuts.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on October 16, 2010, 07:30:47 PM
Quote from: SD on October 16, 2010, 12:44:14 PM
He's rooting for Army.

Proof that loyalty comes in the form of paychecks.  Fans are no better or worse than athletes. 
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on October 16, 2010, 09:34:18 PM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on October 16, 2010, 07:25:16 PM
The Auburn/Arkansas game is nuts.

until it became a blowout it might have been the game of the year

kentucky - sc was awesome as well

and wisconsin osu has the makings of a great finish
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on October 17, 2010, 02:01:20 AM
What a game! Washington beating Oregon St. In double OT. 
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on October 17, 2010, 03:04:32 AM
Oklahoma will be #1.  Boise St.loving' it.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: SD on October 18, 2010, 07:42:46 AM
Quote from: Sgt PSN on October 16, 2010, 07:30:47 PM
Quote from: SD on October 16, 2010, 12:44:14 PM
He's rooting for Army.

Proof that loyalty comes in the form of paychecks.  Fans are no better or worse than athletes. 

Here's how he explained it: "I'm still paying Rutgers, but I'm getting a paycheck for Army, so who would you root for"

Good point
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: DH on October 18, 2010, 09:26:29 AM
Quote from: SD on October 18, 2010, 07:42:46 AM
Quote from: Sgt PSN on October 16, 2010, 07:30:47 PM
Quote from: SD on October 16, 2010, 12:44:14 PM
He's rooting for Army.

Proof that loyalty comes in the form of paychecks.  Fans are no better or worse than athletes. 

Here's how he explained it: "I'm still paying Rutgers, but I'm getting a paycheck for Army, so who would you root for"

Good point

Ha, I was just about to write this. DT Eric LeGrand for RU paralyzed from the neck down - bad news.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on October 23, 2010, 01:29:18 PM
Temple GETTIN IT DONE
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on October 26, 2010, 06:50:40 PM
Did I hear that right?  Boise St. is playing tonight?
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on October 26, 2010, 07:15:23 PM
Yeah, they're only favored by 38.  Should be a barn burner.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Rome on October 29, 2010, 07:24:01 AM
the seminoles lost to nc state last night further cementing my contention that god, indeed, hates me.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on October 29, 2010, 08:27:48 AM
You're partially right.  God hates all Florida State fans.  P.S. The Wolfpack are awful and you should be ashamed.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Rome on October 30, 2010, 06:23:41 PM
notre dame lost at home to tulsa.

:-D
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on October 30, 2010, 06:25:39 PM
Just saw that.  They play Utah in two weeks.  The Utes will be looking to make a statement.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on October 30, 2010, 06:35:18 PM
beating notre dame is not a statement....its even old news for navy who has beaten them three years in a row

not to mention utah plays tcu next week in a monster showdown (and a sneaky game tonight in colorado springs against af) so notre dame isnt even remotely on their minds
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on October 30, 2010, 06:46:53 PM
once again the late afternoon cbs sec game is epic
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: phillymic2000 on October 30, 2010, 07:24:58 PM
Quote from: Rome on October 30, 2010, 06:23:41 PM
notre dame lost at home to tulsa.

:-D

Thats fargin awesome!!
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on October 30, 2010, 10:22:40 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on October 30, 2010, 06:35:18 PM
beating notre dame is not a statement....its even old news for navy who has beaten them three years in a row

not to mention utah plays tcu next week in a monster showdown (and a sneaky game tonight in colorado springs against af) so notre dame isnt even remotely on their minds

I forgot about the showdown with TCU. 
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on November 01, 2010, 06:21:27 PM
someone on a message board:

QuoteGood thing for Temple is that BC and Miami are pushing the ACC brass real hard on adding the owls. BC and Miami felt Temple was a wonderful affiliate in the past and are doing what they can to put Temple back on their schedule. Expect Temple in the ACC by 2012.

im taking this as fact.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on November 01, 2010, 06:33:12 PM
it would be laughable if they were talking about temple basketball.....its preposterous when talking about temple football
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on November 01, 2010, 07:31:21 PM
on a scale of 1 to 10 how much do bc and miami value: a. recruiting in philly and having a showcase game every other year, b. adding a crappy team to the acc they can beat every year, c. giving their ny/dc/philly alumni a game to go to

i say a -13

Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on November 01, 2010, 07:40:03 PM
football from delaware to maine is horrible and philly in particular is even worse....why do you think maryland rutgers penn state pitt syracuse and bc all suck
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on November 01, 2010, 07:46:40 PM
because the black guys are playing basketball instead
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Munson on November 01, 2010, 07:56:20 PM
There's actually a couple Delaware kids that could be on NFL rosters next year. Derrell Smith probably having the best chance.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on November 02, 2010, 04:20:05 PM
big east officially going to 10 teams

probably tcu and ucf or east carolina...maybe nova if they want it

temple is 300th on their list
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on November 02, 2010, 04:24:22 PM
lol
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on November 02, 2010, 05:18:38 PM
nothing says "Big East" like TCU and Houston

neither one will accept anyway (they want the Big XII spots vacated by Nebraska and Colorado)
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on November 02, 2010, 05:21:00 PM
TEMPLE TEMPLE TEMPLE TEMPLE
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on November 02, 2010, 05:30:09 PM
Nothing says "guaranteed BCS bid" like Temple.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on November 03, 2010, 10:46:55 AM
At a meeting Tuesday in Philadelphia, Big East presidents unanimously voted to expand their football league from eight to 10 schools.

The first candidate to join the league is Villanova, which was informally invited in September. The school is in the midst of its own fact-finding and is expected to give the Big East an answer around the end of the year.

If Villanova decides not to move up from the Football Championship Series, the former I-AA, Temple could be a candidate to rejoin the Big East football league. Villanova won the FCS national title in 2009.

In a statement, the Big East said it unanimously "approved the process to evaluate the terms and conditions for potential expansion candidates."

"Today, our board of directors affirmed a set of key strategic initiatives, including expansion, designed to enhance membership stability and maximize our value," said Big East commissioner John Marinatto.

TCU, currently ranked fourth in the AP poll and third in the current BCS standings, would be a top Big East target. The New York Post reported that TCU was interested in a Big East overture. Others mentioned as possibilities include Houston, Central Florida, East Carolina and Memphis.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on November 03, 2010, 12:00:13 PM
you gotta read the temple board, insane hatred/bitterness/jealousy towards nova going on. for some reason they despise nova and this is just setting them off...nova being picked ahead of them. its really sad.

looks like they will take it and even if they dont temple is still a bit down the line. big east people still fondly remember temple blatantly not trying for 15 years and even though things have changed they clearly dont trust them.

thing is with nova is temple has exclusive rights to the linc and unless nova makes a too good too be true offer/an on campus stadium is built, they arent giving it up. so nova will have to play at the soccer stadium in chester....which im sure the crusty old white people will love. 

its been acc or bust for us for 3 years now, at some point theyre gonna want to expand and hopefully they close the gap between bc and umd
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: phattymatty on November 03, 2010, 12:15:57 PM
link please.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on November 03, 2010, 01:19:31 PM
http://temple.rivals.com/showmsg.asp?fid=792&tid=138374329&mid=138374329&sid=1018&style=2
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: phattymatty on November 03, 2010, 01:37:12 PM
haha you thought i was serious.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on November 03, 2010, 01:57:01 PM
It's not that he thought you were serious, it's just that this is the first time he's ever been able to write something and then actually back it up with viable source......and that probably excited him.

Toddy, you know that feeling you have right now?  That feeling of "this must be what it's like to be a journalist?"  Hold on to that feeling pal, because this is the best it's ever going to get for you. 
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on November 03, 2010, 02:00:47 PM
wait so saying temple fans are stupid then linking a message board topic showing this = journalism

interesting.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Rome on November 03, 2010, 06:54:29 PM
lolol @ temple going to the acc.

Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on November 04, 2010, 06:38:42 PM
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=5765214

QuoteDuring the height of star quarterback Cam Newton's recruitment out of junior college last year, a man saying he represented Newton allegedly was soliciting a six-figure payment to secure his signature on a national letter-of-intent, ESPN.com has learned.

This could get interesting.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on November 05, 2010, 12:15:40 PM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on November 04, 2010, 06:38:42 PM
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=5765214

QuoteDuring the height of star quarterback Cam Newton's recruitment out of junior college last year, a man saying he represented Newton allegedly was soliciting a six-figure payment to secure his signature on a national letter-of-intent, ESPN.com has learned.

This could get interesting.

So it seems more and more like some d-bag agent might have got himself paid and given the Newton family absolutely nothing.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: SD on November 06, 2010, 03:14:37 PM
This Michigan/Illinois game is insane. Neither team can play a lick of D. 1:51 left and it's locked up at 45.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on November 06, 2010, 04:15:28 PM
67-65!  I didn't realize the Big Ten basketball season already started.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on November 06, 2010, 04:20:22 PM
Quote from: Rome on September 18, 2010, 05:52:13 PM
How far has Florida State fallen in terms of relevance in college football?

This thing is the PBP announcer for the game on ESPNU today:

(http://cdn0.sbnation.com/imported_assets/281161/pam_ward_medium.jpg)



Guess who the PBP announcer is for the Boise/Hawaii game?  Lucky us.  Boise putting on a clinic against the WACs second best.  :-D. The WAC is such a joke.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on November 06, 2010, 04:45:12 PM
Quote from: Don Ho on November 06, 2010, 04:15:28 PM
67-65!  I didn't realize the Big Ten basketball season already started.

thats way to high of a score for b10 basketball
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on November 06, 2010, 04:59:54 PM
utah is such a fraud and tcu for real (easily better than boise imo)....i put 50 cent on tcu today and im killin myself right now for not laying a dollar
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on November 06, 2010, 06:05:13 PM
Did you see the Oline for TCU?  Good god.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on November 06, 2010, 06:07:48 PM
tcu is legit good...like sec good
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on November 06, 2010, 06:13:35 PM
So the remaining unbeaten are:

Auburn
Oregon
TCU
Boise St

Is that correct?
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on November 06, 2010, 06:22:26 PM
yes sir
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on November 08, 2010, 04:04:19 PM
Saw Devlin play this weekend, he blew up Towson but who wouldnt.  That said, he's got a hell of an arm, very accurate, and def will be a pick in the first 2 rounds
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on November 10, 2010, 08:34:54 PM
Texas-San Antonio (after 1 yr as an indep.), Texas State and possibly Montana will be joining the WAC for football
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Munson on November 10, 2010, 08:36:12 PM
Quote from: Seabiscuit36 on November 08, 2010, 04:04:19 PM
Saw Devlin play this weekend, he blew up Towson but who wouldnt.  That said, he's got a hell of an arm, very accurate, and def will be a pick in the first 2 rounds

IDK if he'll go first two rounds...he's not even the top ranked senior QB....but he should def go by the 4th. If he goes in the 1st or 2nd round it's because of Flacco and his success
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on November 10, 2010, 09:05:17 PM
UTSA in the WAC?!
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on November 10, 2010, 09:32:24 PM
Why not?  Makes as much sense as Louisiana Tech
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on November 10, 2010, 11:57:55 PM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on November 10, 2010, 09:05:17 PM
UTSA in the WAC?!

they have their pick of litter of valley boys. now even better that they have a conference. small mexicans!
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on November 11, 2010, 01:23:21 AM
So I was looking at this year's bowl schedule.  I know it's not a new rant or anything, but jeezus farging christ, how many bowls do we really need?  There's 35 on the schedule this year and I don't even recognize maybe 5 or so of the sponsors.  And they start Dec 18th and go to Jan 10.  3 full weeks of mostly meaningless bowl games.  Other than the championship game, Rose Bowl, Orange Bowl and maybe the Suger Bowl and Fiesta Bowl, do players even get excited for these games anymore?  I mean, do they feel an overwhelming sense of accomplishment for winning the Insight(.com) Bowl?  Do they get a trophy for that crap?  I bet the schools don't even display that shtein. 

I'm in favor of a playoff system to begin with but my new #1 reason is just so we can get rid of these stupid, pointless, multi-million dollar corporate advertisements disguised as a football game.

Oh, and it's also been reported that Cam Newton was paid to go to Auburn.   
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on November 11, 2010, 01:38:47 AM
Quote from: MDS on November 10, 2010, 11:57:55 PM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on November 10, 2010, 09:05:17 PM
UTSA in the WAC?!

they have their pick of litter of valley boys. now even better that they have a conference. small mexicans!

So Todd, does this mean WAC football for you?  Trip to Hawaii?  Do it!
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on November 11, 2010, 02:04:42 AM
im 3.5 hours from SA and the day corporate approves from travel to hawaii is the day temple wins the bcs title
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on November 11, 2010, 10:43:00 AM
Quote from: Sgt PSN on November 11, 2010, 01:23:21 AMI know it's not a new rant or anything, but jeezus farging christ, how many bowls do we really need?  There's 35 on the schedule this year and I don't even recognize maybe 5 or so of the sponsors.

They were on the right track by eliminating the Toronto ("International") one, then they go and add two more ("Pinstripe" at Yankee Stadium and "TicketCity" at the Cotton Bowl).  Plus a bunch of sponsors changed with the new ESPN deal, so now we get Beef 'O' Brady's, uDrove, BBVA Compass and Northrop Grumman.  Awesome.  Can't wait for that Northern Illinois/Arkansas State matchup...
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: DH on November 11, 2010, 10:46:51 AM
See you all at the Military Bowl (brought to you by Northrop Grumman)!
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on November 11, 2010, 10:48:23 AM
Simmer down, Ed.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on November 11, 2010, 01:00:00 PM
Poulan Weedeater Bowl

GOAT
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on November 13, 2010, 03:31:14 PM
Wisconsin dropped 83 on Indiana
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on November 13, 2010, 03:51:11 PM
I may have to get to FedEx Field next Saturday.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on November 13, 2010, 04:32:35 PM
TCU down 14-0 to San Diego State.  Blew their wad on Utah last week?  Oh, in other news, farg Utah.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on November 16, 2010, 11:17:25 PM
at home with a spot in the conference championship game on the line and everything goes bad.  yay Temple.  Pack your bags for the who-cares-it's-December-23rd Bowl
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on November 16, 2010, 11:46:35 PM
if theyre lucky they go to the humanitarian bowl in boise

also: other bowl officials and big east officials were at the game. no one was there, temple looked awful, they lost badly. mac4life.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on November 17, 2010, 07:40:21 AM
the mac should never get more than one team per season in a bowl game
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on November 18, 2010, 01:00:47 PM
Forget Indiana/PSU at FedEx, football at Wrigley Field is effing awesome (http://www.ncaa.com/sports/m-footbl/spec-rel/111510aab.html).
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: DH on November 18, 2010, 03:47:27 PM
It's gonna be better at Yankee Stadium..

(http://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc4/hs1150.snc4/149280_454604704262_12309004262_5575147_5332508_n.jpg)
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on November 19, 2010, 03:06:04 AM
QuoteHONOLULU – University of Hawai'i President M.R.C. Greenwood announced Thursday that UH has been asked to enter discussions for the Warrior Football team to join the Mountain West Conference.

The overture came in a telephone call to Greenwood earlier in the day from Mountain West Commissioner Craig Thompson at the conference's headquarters in Colorado Springs, Colo.

"The commissioner asked the University of Hawai'i to begin discussions with the aim of the football team entering the conference as soon as possible," said Greenwood.

Oh farg, Boise and TCU are back. 
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on November 19, 2010, 11:46:25 AM
Like it matters.  You're basically guaranteed a spot in the Hawaii Bowl every year even if they go 6-6.


Quote from: FastFreddie on November 18, 2010, 01:00:47 PM
football at Wrigley Field is effing awesome (http://www.ncaa.com/sports/m-footbl/spec-rel/111510aab.html).

BigTen announced this morning they aren't going to use the endzone near the RF wall because of safety concerns, so all drives will be heading west towards the Cubs dugout
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: SunMo on November 19, 2010, 11:50:14 AM
lol, how half-assed can you get?
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on November 19, 2010, 12:16:10 PM
Just like Pop Warner where a majority of the fields have one goal post.  When did they plan this game, Monday morning?
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on November 20, 2010, 11:51:02 AM
miami is rockin new green helmets today
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on November 20, 2010, 05:46:39 PM
Can't believe I'm watching this game from Wrigley.  Started off looking like an Illini romp but it's actually a pretty good game.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on November 20, 2010, 05:49:54 PM
i cant believe how deep the talent is in the sec...coaching in the bottom half of the league is only thing holding most of these teams back...kirk ferentz would have mississippi in the bcs title game this year
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on November 20, 2010, 05:55:23 PM
Masoli is actually having a pretty good year considering he transferred at the 11th hour.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on November 20, 2010, 05:58:04 PM
did you see that almost brawl before the cal stanford game where the cal player popped a stanford player then stanford proceeded to kick their asses all over the field...31-0 at half....


it was just like the eagles game
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on November 20, 2010, 06:00:58 PM
love miamis helmets but their jerseys are terrible
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on November 20, 2010, 06:05:37 PM
Yea, helmets are awesome but those uniforms gotta go.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on November 20, 2010, 06:09:32 PM
This LSU/Ole Miss game is great!  Did you see that hit on the onside kick?  shtein.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on November 20, 2010, 06:11:35 PM
yeah

its easily the best game of the day

its nothing that everyone doesnt already know but the speed is outrageous when contrasted with the big ten

and forget lsu just watch mississippi and then watch even the best big ten teams and the difference is more than palpable

where you really notice the difference is in the closing speed on defense
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on November 20, 2010, 06:11:48 PM
Sorry, meant squibb kick.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on November 20, 2010, 06:42:59 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on November 20, 2010, 05:58:04 PM
did you see that almost brawl before the cal stanford game where the cal player popped a stanford player then stanford proceeded to kick their asses all over the field...31-0 at half....


it was just like the eagles game

Is it irony or coincidence that Pimp went to Cal?
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on November 20, 2010, 06:48:07 PM
lets wait for tomorrows game before we decide
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on November 20, 2010, 06:56:21 PM
this lsu ole miss game is LEGIT!!!!!!!!!...maybe the best game of the year

and i just found out that excessive celebration next year in cfb is not 15 yards on the kickoff but they actually bring the play back and the score doesnt count

is there a worse group of humans in the history of earth than the ncaa
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on November 20, 2010, 06:58:58 PM
maybe the tea party, but I'd assume there's some crossover there
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on November 20, 2010, 07:08:06 PM
its my favorite sport in the world but im so mad at cfb right now for these rules...that stupid celebration penalty maybe just took this game from ole miss and its so ridiculously unfair
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on November 20, 2010, 07:36:15 PM
them colored boys need to behave, dont they
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on November 20, 2010, 07:53:27 PM
Army needed a TD there.  Now the Irish will march the field and go up 7-3.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on November 20, 2010, 08:01:18 PM
why are the end zones the same as in south bend
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on November 20, 2010, 09:26:46 PM
Did an Illinois running back actually have 330 yards on the ground today?  Wowee wow.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: DH on November 22, 2010, 12:33:34 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on November 20, 2010, 08:01:18 PM
why are the end zones the same as in south bend

it was an nd home game
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on November 22, 2010, 12:45:28 PM
indiana was the home team at fed ex vs penn state and had penn state painted in one end zone


nd elitism at its worst
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: DH on November 22, 2010, 12:49:23 PM
the game in fedex had both end zones painted because both schools multimedia rights are owned by the same company..essentially the schools split the revenue for the game.

forget what the end zones looked like at yankee stadium..all the pre-game activities were nd centric - they even streamed their awful online pre-game show on the jumbotron for about 2 hours before kick.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on November 22, 2010, 12:58:27 PM
Quote from: Die-Hard on November 22, 2010, 12:49:23 PMforget what the end zones looked like at yankee stadium..all the pre-game activities were nd centric

I think both had the diagonal lines
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: DH on November 22, 2010, 01:04:42 PM
true
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on November 26, 2010, 03:17:15 PM
That flag on Auburn for unsportsmanlike conduct is everything that is wrong with the NCAA.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on November 26, 2010, 03:17:31 PM
night night auburn
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on November 26, 2010, 05:35:11 PM
ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmm no

laws of physics say all sec cbs games must be epic
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on November 26, 2010, 05:40:11 PM
farging Auburn up by a point!  Holy BCSbullshtein!

Look at all these games this year where they came back to win.  If they win this, win the SEC championship, play for the National Championship we'll have Cam Newton out the ass coverage, discussion, media overload, etc.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on November 26, 2010, 06:12:55 PM
Epic game.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on November 27, 2010, 01:12:30 AM
its disgusting how routinely epic these games are

boise/nevada late night thriller
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: DH on November 27, 2010, 01:26:45 AM
doug martin is gonna be a stud on the next level..that last catch and run was nasty
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on November 27, 2010, 01:43:24 AM
how the farg does he catch that with 9 seconds left?

then how the farg does the kicker push a straight up 26 yarder?

holy hell what a game
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: DH on November 27, 2010, 01:44:31 AM
this game keeps getting better..solid day of football all around
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on November 27, 2010, 01:47:56 AM
i cant tell whether i want boise to win to be a bcs buster or nevada to win for stunning upsets sake
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: DH on November 27, 2010, 01:51:55 AM
boise for sure..ive grown to like them over the years
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on November 27, 2010, 01:54:30 AM
sorry?

bullshtein that boise's 1 loss could get keep them out of bcs bowl now because they lost later than lsu and osu. these games are too good to see them wind up in the bcs.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: DH on November 27, 2010, 01:57:31 AM
no way they make a bcs game now, they lose the wac. theyre lucky if theyre playing on new years.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on November 27, 2010, 01:58:37 AM
thats even worse

this system is horrendous. they lose a game like that because of the kicker and now they're going to what, the alamo bowl?
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: DH on November 27, 2010, 02:01:27 AM
and even worse that that - the hipster doofus osu president is somewhere smoking a thousand dollar cigar laughing his nerdy ass off.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Munson on November 27, 2010, 02:07:28 AM
As long as deep down inside he knows Boise State would spank Ohio this year, then he can smoke as many dongs as he wants.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on November 27, 2010, 02:08:29 AM
oregon still has to win @ oregon st
auburn has to win sec title in neutral field...same spot florida lost last year

there is hope for tcu
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: DH on November 27, 2010, 02:09:39 AM
there was a halfway decent chance they woulda played in the rose bowl had boise taken care of business tonight
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on November 27, 2010, 02:10:37 AM
meanwhile les miles keeps getting gifts from the football gods and hes in great shape

sports blows sometimes.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on November 27, 2010, 10:19:17 AM
still cant believe that kicker....biggest choke in sports history and theres no competition whatsoever
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on November 27, 2010, 02:49:18 PM
Scott Norwood's was way worse
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on November 27, 2010, 03:24:31 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on November 27, 2010, 10:19:17 AM
still cant believe that kicker....biggest choke in sports history and theres no competition whatsoever

why do you speak in hyperbole all the time
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: DH on November 27, 2010, 03:26:39 PM
Buckner says hi
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on November 27, 2010, 03:35:51 PM
this doesnt even crack the top 25 individual chokes

nothing involving boise st and nevada can. in fact in the end it could simply mean the difference between making the rose bowl or not. more than likely they werent making the title game.

and on top of that nobody will remember his name. i dont even know what it is. hes just gonna be the boise kicker. thats it. no bucker, no norwood. the boise kicker is his name.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: DH on November 27, 2010, 03:40:12 PM
I'll remember it..the kid is a hebrew
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on November 27, 2010, 03:40:55 PM
without looking what is his name

i think it starts with a b
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: DH on November 27, 2010, 03:42:53 PM
kyle brotzman - the most hated man in Idaho.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on November 27, 2010, 03:45:09 PM
sounds like someone just lost his trust fund
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on November 27, 2010, 04:49:05 PM
Quote from: BigEd76 on November 27, 2010, 02:49:18 PM
Scott Norwood's was way worse

keep to posting facts

norwoods was one kick from 47 yards

this guy missed two extra points

Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on November 27, 2010, 06:38:45 PM
i realize that he did a game a yesterday but why isnt verne in little rock now
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on November 27, 2010, 06:50:50 PM
Hawaii/Nevada/Boise State tri WAC champs.  Hawaii beat Nevada, Nevada beat Boise, Boise beat Hawaii.  How fitting as all are bailing on the WAC next year for the Mountain West.

Hawaii running back had 327 yards rushing today at New Mexico State.  I think that's how many rushing yards they've had the past 5 seasons combined.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on November 27, 2010, 07:24:16 PM
They still have a team in Hawaii?
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on November 27, 2010, 07:37:21 PM
yeah i thought they folded when june jones died
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on November 27, 2010, 08:13:53 PM
June Jones?  Was she the mom on that Beaver show?
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on November 27, 2010, 08:33:59 PM
that was June Cleaver you stupid heeb
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on November 27, 2010, 09:23:29 PM
If I'm the stupid heeb, does that make you the smart WASP with a girthy cock?
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: DH on November 27, 2010, 09:42:31 PM
lol
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on November 28, 2010, 01:07:29 AM
June Jones is in the process of leading SMU to the Bounty Paper Towel Bowl or whatever the farg they call it now.

He's actually done a good job in his three years there as SMU is playing UCF for the Conf USA title next weekend.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on November 28, 2010, 03:11:54 AM
Just saw the replay of the NC State/Maryland game.  Wow, did NC State get hosed on that spot that gave Maryland the first down with 00:53.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Rome on November 28, 2010, 05:53:42 AM
i watched the last half of the seminoles/gators game at a bar here and it was amazing how quiet the place was.   i mean, it was full and all, but church quiet.

gator fans are the worst collection of douchebags ever and it's entirely enjoyable watching them suffer.

<insert random smiley here>
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on November 28, 2010, 11:09:03 AM
Quote from: Don Ho on November 28, 2010, 03:11:54 AM
Just saw the replay of the NC State/Maryland game.  Wow, did NC State get hosed on that spot that gave Maryland the first down with 00:53.

incredibly so....they even reviewed it and still got it wrong
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on November 28, 2010, 12:11:58 PM
NC State deserved to lose anyway.  They suck.  Russell Wilson is even worse at baseball.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on November 28, 2010, 08:51:17 PM
-- rumors floating that Gruden is taking the Miami job for $3M+/yr

-- Wisconsin finished ahead of Ohio State and Michigan State in the latest BCS rankings, so they're going to the Rose Bowl while Ohio State goes to the Sugar or Fiesta as an at-large
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on November 28, 2010, 10:11:33 PM
So MSU is out of a BCS bowl?
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on November 28, 2010, 10:29:20 PM
yea they'll get the Capital One Bowl in Orlando and face LSU or Alabama

PSU and Iowa will be in the Outback and Gator but they don't know which one yet

Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on November 28, 2010, 11:28:49 PM
temple:

boise, new mexico, vegas

Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on November 28, 2010, 11:33:04 PM
Humanitarian Bowl, Boises' a nice place in December.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on November 28, 2010, 11:34:22 PM
probably none of the above

they are the 4th or 5th best mac team. if that = bowl game then i dont know
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on November 29, 2010, 12:04:01 AM
it'll be one of those three cities.  Right now I have them going to Vegas to face the Utes.  yea

Temple will get a bowl since there's 5 or 6 spots that can't be fulfilled, including 3 in the Pac-10.  Most of the projections have Western Michigan being the only qualified team that won't get picked



Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on November 29, 2010, 01:07:34 AM
Quote from: BigEd76 on November 29, 2010, 12:04:01 AM
Right now I have them going to Vegas to face the Utes.  yea

lol only easy can get away with this
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on November 29, 2010, 10:33:51 AM
TCU to the Big East for all sports starting in 2012-13
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Drunkmasterflex on November 29, 2010, 10:34:59 AM
Texas Christian in the Big East what is this world coming to?
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on November 29, 2010, 11:00:17 AM
It would be hilarious if they lost their automatic BCS bid prior to that.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: DH on November 29, 2010, 11:39:31 AM
same thing i was thinking...holy shtein, is the big east terrible or what
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on November 29, 2010, 11:51:08 AM
wait until they add temple
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: DH on November 29, 2010, 12:23:31 PM
the fact that an aq such as the big east was considering the likes of nova and temple are more than enough proof that it should be an aq no longer
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on November 29, 2010, 12:32:24 PM
not to mention the second the sec, pac 10 or something goes to 16 tcu is out of there

and now big east hoops has 17 teams, which is just awful.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: DH on November 29, 2010, 01:06:48 PM
and rutgers hoops will still finish last
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: DH on November 30, 2010, 02:30:38 PM
Army back in the postseason (because you all care) (http://www.armedforcesbowl.com/2010/11/army-accepts-bell-helicopter-armed-forces-bowl-bid/)
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on November 30, 2010, 02:44:05 PM
Did you get paid a bonus for that?
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on November 30, 2010, 02:59:21 PM
Quote from: Die-Hard on November 30, 2010, 02:30:38 PM
Army back in the postseason (because you all care) (http://www.armedforcesbowl.com/2010/11/army-accepts-bell-helicopter-armed-forces-bowl-bid/)


or because they dont have enough teams to fill all the bowl spots this year
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on November 30, 2010, 03:03:55 PM
actually they....ah nevermind
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on November 30, 2010, 03:11:15 PM
never been more proud of you eazy
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on November 30, 2010, 03:17:58 PM
ha
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: DH on November 30, 2010, 03:55:13 PM
Quote from: FastFreddie on November 30, 2010, 02:44:05 PM
Did you get paid a bonus for that?

not technically, but increased interest = increased dollars to the academy = more money in my pocket = more eagles road games = i win.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on December 01, 2010, 02:51:47 AM
gruden to miami
4/17.1

just wait
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on December 01, 2010, 01:37:07 PM
so apparently the ncaa can prove that cecil newton was shopping camron but cant prove that camron knewton about it or that auburn was a buyer....ncaa is such a joke



According to facts of the case agreed upon by Auburn University and the NCAA enforcement staff, the student-athlete's father and an owner of a scouting service worked together to actively market the student-athlete as a part of a pay-for-play scenario in return for Newton's commitment to attend college and play football. NCAA rules (Bylaw 12.3.3) do not allow individuals or entities to represent a prospective student-athlete for compensation to a school for an athletic scholarship.

In conjunction with the case, Auburn University has limited the access Newton's father has to the athletics program and Mississippi State has disassociated the involved individual.

"The conduct of Cam Newton's father and the involved individual is unacceptable and has no place in the SEC or in intercollegiate athletics," said Mike Slive, Southeastern Conference Commissioner. "The actions taken by Auburn University and Mississippi State University make it clear this behavior will not be tolerated in the SEC."

"Our members have established rules for a fair and equal recruitment of student-athletes, as well as to promote integrity in the recruiting process," said Kevin Lennon, NCAA vice president for academic and membership affairs. "In determining how a violation impacts a student-athlete's eligibility, we must consider the young person's responsibility. Based on the information available to the reinstatement staff at this time, we do not have sufficient evidence that Cam Newton or anyone from Auburn was aware of this activity, which led to his reinstatement. From a student-athlete reinstatement perspective, Auburn University met its obligation under NCAA bylaw 14.11.1. Under this threshold, the student-athlete has not participated while ineligible."
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on December 01, 2010, 01:50:39 PM
So, how did Auburn pay Cecil Newton without leaving a paper trail?
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on December 01, 2010, 01:57:14 PM
auburn is stringer bell and the boosters are preston broadus
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on December 01, 2010, 02:06:06 PM
So the boosters are underlings but live an extra season?
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on December 02, 2010, 07:39:34 PM
something Todd might care about (but probably not): UMass wants to move up to FBS and join the MAC (http://bostonherald.com/sports/columnists/view.bg?articleid=1299775&srvc=sports&position=2)

and Syracuse announced today they'll be playing in that new Pinstripe Bowl at Yankee Stadium
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on December 02, 2010, 08:09:10 PM
I knew a week ago easy. I'm so big at temple random dudes who want to be the womens soccer coach email me for intel.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on December 03, 2010, 12:09:04 AM
Epic finish to ASU/Arizona.

I can't believe Dennis Erickson continues to get head coaching jobs (even though he won tonight, yes).
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on December 03, 2010, 12:20:53 AM
Did you see Zendejas as he tried to run off the field after the missed xp in OT?  He was getting a ration of shtein from the crowd and stopped to talk some shtein back.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on December 03, 2010, 01:28:33 AM
Did I hear correctly on the radio today that if South Carolina beats Auburn in the SEC Champ Game then TCU plays for the national championship?  So yeah, in case anyone was wondering exactly why the NCAA didn't suspend/ban Cam Newton.....there ya go. 
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Munson on December 03, 2010, 01:45:09 AM
Pretty much.


I'm begging for SC to win so we get to see a "small school" in there.


BCS is 85% of the reason why I don't watch college football
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on December 03, 2010, 01:58:34 AM
Well, Hawaii is #23 in the country.  Now I am certain something is really wrong with college football.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on December 03, 2010, 02:13:22 AM
Quote from: Munson on December 03, 2010, 01:45:09 AM
BCS is 85% of the reason why I don't watch college football

85% of the reason I don't watch it very much is because I didn't go to a big D-1 school, so I have no personal connection of ties to any team out there (GO BLOOMSBURG!!)  10% is because I hate the BCS and the other 5% is because I choose to dedicate my time to things other than following a sport that has like 300 teams.  I figure that for the most part, I'll see the guys who are worth watching in college when they get to the pros. 
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on December 03, 2010, 07:46:02 AM
Newton will be ruled ineligible some time after the National Championship, once the NCAA has all their cake.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on December 04, 2010, 03:05:40 AM
Quote from: Sgt PSN on December 03, 2010, 02:13:22 AM
Quote from: Munson on December 03, 2010, 01:45:09 AM
BCS is 85% of the reason why I don't watch college football

85% of the reason I don't watch it very much is because I didn't go to a big D-1 school, so I have no personal connection of ties to any team out there (GO BLOOMSBURG!!)  

Try cheer for my boys at that almighty powerhouse University of New Hampshire.  Gave UConn a battle the other night in bball.  I'm sure the Huskies were still suffering from jet lag and island girl madness after the Maui Classic.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on December 04, 2010, 08:02:52 PM
Alabama fan drunk on Natty Light...

http://deadspin.com/5705678/

LOL
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on December 05, 2010, 05:31:54 PM
just confirmed....8-4 Temple will not be going to any bowl game
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on December 05, 2010, 05:36:28 PM
MDS cries himself to sleep tonight
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on December 05, 2010, 05:36:38 PM
Good. They don't deserve it
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Rome on December 05, 2010, 05:40:27 PM
how is that even possible?
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on December 05, 2010, 05:44:42 PM
they beat one of the bcs bowl teams by two touchdowns
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on December 05, 2010, 05:46:46 PM
Al golden should be shot for losing to ohio. He's a fraud
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on December 05, 2010, 06:01:29 PM
Quote from: Rome on December 05, 2010, 05:40:27 PM
how is that even possible?

They got left out when Middle Tennessee State and Washington became bowl eligible yesterday.  Western Michigan is the other eligible team that didn't get an invite.  Thirteen 6-6 teams are in and Temple isn't.  Amazing...
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: SunMo on December 05, 2010, 08:31:56 PM
that mac sure is a powerhouse in CFB
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on December 05, 2010, 10:46:33 PM
Thirteen 6-6 teams are bowl bound?  Good god.

Hawaii 10 - 3 and #23 in BCS rankings which is absolutely appalling.  Guess it does pay to slap around La Tech, New Mexico State, UNLV, Army, etc.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Eagles_Legendz on December 05, 2010, 10:47:50 PM
I don't like Temple but that is disgraceful.  8-4 and no invite with all the shtein bowls that are around?
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on December 06, 2010, 02:54:00 AM
id put a 5-7 texas team before id put the disgrace pathetic joke awful mac team in

their 8-4 is slightly better than whatever texas a&m kingsville did. al golden is such a fat farging fraud. theres a reason nobody except ucla even sniffed this guy out for another job. no one wants him because he sucks.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on December 06, 2010, 06:59:01 AM
There will always be room for him as an assistant linebackers coach at UPS.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: DH on December 06, 2010, 01:02:23 PM
Quote from: Don Ho on December 05, 2010, 10:46:33 PM
Thirteen 6-6 teams are bowl bound?  Good god.

Hawaii 10 - 3 and #23 in BCS rankings which is absolutely appalling.  Guess it does pay to slap around La Tech, New Mexico State, UNLV, Army, etc.

Winning by 3 points after recovering a fumble at your own 25 with 24 seconds left doesn't scream "slap around". 
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: phattymatty on December 06, 2010, 01:04:27 PM
there will be 4 weeks of regular season NFL, plus an entire weekend of playoffs, before auburn and oregon play. ridiculous.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on December 06, 2010, 02:35:20 PM
"i love bowls."

-m. havas
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on December 06, 2010, 02:41:29 PM
they arent as good as the regular season but they are fabulous in their own right and they are what make the cfb regular season by far the best in all of sports

except the FIFA championships of course
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on December 06, 2010, 04:51:36 PM
Quote from: phattymatty on December 06, 2010, 01:04:27 PM
there will be 4 weeks of regular season NFL, plus an entire weekend of playoffs, before auburn and oregon play. ridiculous.

35 days until Auburn/Oregon.  Will anyone care?  I guess once I hear the ESPN "it's the most wonderful time of the year" campaign the blood will get flowing.

35 firkin bowl games!  Geez.

http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/bowls10/columns/story?columnist=schlabach_mark&id=5890999 (http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/bowls10/columns/story?columnist=schlabach_mark&id=5890999)

Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: hbionic on December 06, 2010, 05:08:43 PM
College Football = Yawn.

I've followed USC all my life....but now...I don't really care about college football. It does not induce a sports erection for me anymore.

That said, I would like to see a playoff of the top 4 teams to battle it out....and get rid of the rest of the 31 bowls.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on December 06, 2010, 05:18:08 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on December 06, 2010, 02:41:29 PM
they arent as good as the regular season but they are fabulous in their own right and they are what make the cfb regular season by far the best in all of sports

except the FIFA championships of course

yea, nothing says fabulous quite like the pizza bowl between toledo and fiu in a 1/4th filled ford field
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on December 07, 2010, 07:29:37 AM
yeah mentioning the single worst game out of 35 bowls definitely shows that they all suck

the ncaa tournament blows dood...i mean who wants to watch a neutral site play in game btwn alcorn state and jacksonville
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on December 07, 2010, 11:35:37 AM
even the rose bowl sucks. every bowl game sucks except for the national title.

they mean nothing and are absolutely forgettable aside from once in a blue moon games like boise st/oklahoma.

Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on December 07, 2010, 11:41:19 AM
just say like hbionic that you dont like cfb and leave it at that...you will look far less dumb
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on December 07, 2010, 11:44:09 AM
i love college football. i dont like glorified exhibition games.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on December 07, 2010, 11:59:55 AM
you cant possibly like cfb and not like the rose bowl

you are confusing hating the bcs with hating cfb...lots of people fall into the former group

you are def in the latter
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: phattymatty on December 07, 2010, 12:05:49 PM
i don't know i'm with the kid.

i love college football and will watch the bowl games, but they essentially mean no more than any regular season game.  you could still keep all the meaningless bowl games and fit a playoff into the next 4 weeks.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on December 07, 2010, 12:07:25 PM
love: that boise st/nevada game, sec saturday afternoon guaranteed epic
hate: everything that comes after it

also its impossible to love something where a god awful uconn team plays in a big time bowl simply based on conference affiliation. the whole system is rigged and a joke and you know it.

an 8 team playoff based on committee vote takes very little away from the regular season. all it means is that some top level teams can generally lose 1 game and still play for a title. im willing to give that up for a playoff.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on December 07, 2010, 12:13:35 PM
Quote from: phattymatty on December 07, 2010, 12:05:49 PM
i don't know i'm with the kid.

i love college football and will watch the bowl games, but they essentially mean no more than any regular season game.  you could still keep all the meaningless bowl games and fit a playoff into the next 4 weeks.

you are not with him

you are in the i like cfb but i hate the bcs club

you will watch the bowl games and you certainly dont hate the rose bowl


theres also a difference btwn the bowl games meaning nothing...to the bowl games meaning nothing to you....they mean a lot to the teams in them...winning a bowl is a big deal for almost every program
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on December 07, 2010, 12:17:34 PM
lol i love you telling people who and what they are, this is great.

but i could seriously care less what they mean to the players and the programs. the only team i care about is a disaster and winning or not winning the eagle bank bowl at the end of the day means less than munsons life.

how about this saturday:
auburn vs. boise st
oregon vs. ohio st
tcu vs. oklahoma
wisconsin vs. stanford

you're telling me you dont want this
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on December 07, 2010, 05:08:54 PM
Wannstedt out at Pitt
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on December 07, 2010, 05:44:21 PM
They should hire Al Golden.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on December 07, 2010, 05:57:52 PM
they would idiots to do that...then again they hired wannstedt in the first place so i guess it might happen
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on December 07, 2010, 06:42:57 PM
Love college football

Hate the BCS

Hate the wait for bowl games and the championship game

Hate the NCAA
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on December 08, 2010, 02:20:36 PM
urban meyer quitting florida....again


possibly to hook up with jesus tim??
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on December 08, 2010, 02:22:58 PM
He's scared of losing to a hundred year old coach.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Rome on December 08, 2010, 06:37:52 PM
Bitchmade motherfarger, plain & simple.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on December 08, 2010, 06:47:01 PM
his family didnt seem to matter when tim tebow was his qb
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on December 08, 2010, 06:49:23 PM
That's because he was getting enough head from Timmy to not worry about it
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Drunkmasterflex on December 08, 2010, 09:31:29 PM
Next coach at PSU?  :D
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on December 09, 2010, 07:28:15 AM
IN
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on December 09, 2010, 08:42:33 AM
My nipples just got a little hard.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: rjs246 on December 09, 2010, 08:45:39 AM
In 6 years when Joe Pa dies on the sidelines? Sure.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Munson on December 10, 2010, 08:16:23 PM
UD getting some ESPN2 time, oh yeah
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on December 10, 2010, 10:27:29 PM
Devlin has picked it up as the game has gone on here.  That WR #81 looks good for Delaware.  UNH grad so any exposure they get west of Manchester, NH is good.   
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on December 11, 2010, 02:34:44 PM
Nova is up big at #1 Appalachian State

Army/Navy is getting started at the Linc
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on December 11, 2010, 05:07:21 PM
Where the farg are the score updates, Ed?  Army/Navy and NDSU/Eastern Washington.  Let's go, bitch.  I don't want to have to replace you with espn.com.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on December 11, 2010, 05:26:02 PM
al golden, uconns coach and the montreal cfl's team coach leading candidates for miami job

i would die to see golden at the U....if they thought shannon couldnt win, watch out. you know nothing about that yet.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Rome on December 11, 2010, 06:03:38 PM
Army -  Navy was a pretty decent game.  Navy owns that ass right now.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on December 11, 2010, 10:07:55 PM
Will Muschamp to Florida

Cam Newton wins the Heisman (Luck, James, Moore)

105 people left Newton off their ballot

the SMU 30 for 30 is great
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on December 11, 2010, 10:09:41 PM
stop posting the espn ticker you whore...errrrrr easy
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on December 11, 2010, 11:16:40 PM
so there are 105 hypocrites on the heisman voting committee

seems kind of low
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: SD on December 12, 2010, 08:53:15 AM
Quote from: Rome on December 11, 2010, 06:03:38 PM
Army -  Navy was a pretty decent game.  Navy owns that ass right now.

I was there, Diehard got me tickets. Fun game to be at. It's weird watching a game at the Linc and not seeing 80 passing plays.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on December 12, 2010, 02:06:27 PM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on December 11, 2010, 10:07:55 PM
the SMU 30 for 30 is great

Excellent.  It's amazing, most of these stories haven't been talked about in years.  The Marcus Dupree story, USFL, Ali/Holmes, the Colombian soccer team, etc.  Good stuff.   

June Jones the  savior.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on December 12, 2010, 06:31:58 PM
ESPN reporting that MDS' boy Al Golden is expected to take th Miami job
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on December 12, 2010, 07:34:38 PM
hes there tops 3 years

miami wants national titles and al golden doesnt even know how to win mac east championships.

plus hes not a dirty ill go get anyone recruiter. they fired shannon because he didnt go into the mud. golden will play by the same rules but with even worse results cause hes a fragile little bitch. first loss or first time media/fans get on him he will cry in the corner behind his SID.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on December 12, 2010, 08:11:28 PM
Hilarious.  Florida snakes a "coach in waiting" from a top tier school, and Miami "nabs" the coach from Temple.  Sad.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Munson on December 12, 2010, 08:27:59 PM
Quote from: BigEd76 on December 11, 2010, 02:34:44 PM
Nova is up big at #1 Appalachian State

Army/Navy is getting started at the Linc

Would love to see a UD/Nova final
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on December 12, 2010, 10:22:36 PM
Nova has to go play on the red turf @ Eastern Washington first.  With the snow yesterday it almost looked pink
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on December 12, 2010, 10:47:44 PM
whitlock with me on golden, says hes done within 4 years there.

i mean this thing could be even 2. he never beat a mac team with a winning record and frank solich coached circles around him.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: SunMo on December 12, 2010, 10:55:41 PM
they fired a black guy and hired a white guy and Whitlock isn't on board?  crazy
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on December 13, 2010, 10:10:11 AM
Quote from: MDS on December 12, 2010, 10:47:44 PM
whitlock with me on golden, says hes done within 4 years there.

i mean this thing could be even 2. he never beat a mac team with a winning record and frank solich coached circles around him.

you loved golden like five minutes ago and had them beating penn state every time they played...now whitlock is "with you" on golden?

i smell fraud
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on December 13, 2010, 10:15:59 AM
Todd is a "what have you done for me lately" kind of guy.  So, despite the fact that Temple went from being a complete pin cushion to being bowl eligible two years in a row, he still puts the blame on the coach.  Because the coach is white and from Penn State, most likely.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Rome on December 13, 2010, 12:04:25 PM
Golden is a great choice for Miami especially considering im a Noles fan.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on December 13, 2010, 12:06:46 PM
Well, he's no Jimbo Fisher.  I'll tell you that much.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on December 13, 2010, 12:08:16 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on December 13, 2010, 10:10:11 AM
Quote from: MDS on December 12, 2010, 10:47:44 PM
whitlock with me on golden, says hes done within 4 years there.

i mean this thing could be even 2. he never beat a mac team with a winning record and frank solich coached circles around him.

you loved golden like five minutes ago and had them beating penn state every time they played...now whitlock is "with you" on golden?

i smell fraud

the losses to a pos ohio team and them not even bothering to show for up the miami of ohio game sent me off the golden train

when you look at the facts hes had 3 years of having competitive teams that can win. and hes beat 3 teams with winning records: nova, navy and uconn. color me impressed with that.

hes also lost every single big mac games hes been in. and he lost that bowl game to a terrible ucla team. hes a horrendous game day coach and simply never his team ready for big games. if he wasnt such a Hoyda who knows maybe they beat psu this year. his game plan and refusal to bench chester stewart were disastrous.

hes a great recruiter who took temple from nothing to a run of the mill mac team. for that he will also be a legend on north broad but i cant see how someone is going to go from blowing mac east titles to winning national titles. 
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on December 13, 2010, 12:20:07 PM
new BigTen logo (http://s3.amazonaws.com/twitpic/photos/full/207636533.jpg?AWSAccessKeyId=0ZRYP5X5F6FSMBCCSE82&Expires=1292261071&Signature=md9EKDXSOiqGStLLIHLuy6xdSCg%3D)

and the divisions will be called "Leaders" and "Legends".  Awful

PSU/tOSU/Wisc/Purdue/Ill/Indiana is the "Leaders" division
Mich/MichSt/NW/Minn/Iowa/Nebraska is the "Legends" division

The conference champ gets the "Stagg-Paterno Trophy", with the MVP getting the "Grange-Griffin Trophy".  The coach of the year gets the "Hayes-Schembechler Trophy".

Really


Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on December 13, 2010, 12:39:23 PM
Quote from: BigEd76 on December 13, 2010, 12:20:07 PM
new BigTen logo (http://s3.amazonaws.com/twitpic/photos/full/207636533.jpg?AWSAccessKeyId=0ZRYP5X5F6FSMBCCSE82&Expires=1292261071&Signature=md9EKDXSOiqGStLLIHLuy6xdSCg%3D)

and the divisions will be called "Leaders" and "Legends".  Awful

PSU/tOSU/Wisc/Purdue/Ill/Indiana is the "Leaders" division
Mich/MichSt/NW/Minn/Iowa/Nebraska is the "Legends" division

The conference champ gets the "Stagg-Paterno Trophy", with the MVP getting the "Grange-Griffin Trophy".  The coach of the year gets the "Hayes-Schembechler Trophy".

Really

Wow, that's bad.  So the Big Ten coach of the year gets the Hayes-Schembechler but the NCAA FBS coach of the year gets the Joseph V. Paterno award.  farging weird.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on December 13, 2010, 12:50:00 PM
is there anything out there more full of itself than the big 10?
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on December 13, 2010, 12:53:50 PM
(http://www.midwestsportsfans.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/brett-favre-vikings.jpg)
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on December 13, 2010, 01:40:15 PM
HA!  :-D
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: DH on December 13, 2010, 02:18:10 PM
Quote from: BigEd76 on December 13, 2010, 12:20:07 PM
PSU/tOSU/Wisc/Purdue/Ill/Indiana is the "Leaders" division
Mich/MichSt/NW/Minn/Iowa/Nebraska is the "Legends" division

lol
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on December 13, 2010, 03:01:58 PM
oops

btw there's more BigTen trophies.  Even igy's boy Randle El gets honored in one....

Graham-George Offensive POY
Nagurski-Woodson Defensive POY (Charles)
Thompson-Randle El Freshman of the Year
Griese-Brees QB of the Year
Ameche-Dayne RB of the Year
Richter-Howard WR of the Year
Kwalick-Clark TE of the Year
Rimington-Pace OL of the Year
Smith-Brown DL of the Year  (yeah that's Courtney, PSU peeps)
Butkus-Fitzgerald LB of the Year
Tatum-Woodson DB of the Year (Rod)
Bakken-Andersen K of the Year
Eddleman-Fields P of the year

Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on December 13, 2010, 03:10:11 PM
Big Fail.

All around awfulness
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on December 15, 2010, 01:02:53 AM
Mark D'Onofrio, Temple's defensive coordinator, turned down the head coaching job and will go with Golden to Miami.

Smart move or is he an idiot?
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on December 15, 2010, 07:27:58 AM
legendary program in a bcs conference located in miami vs middle of the road mac team

if he turned down the temple job to be miami's towel boy it would have been a smart move
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Drunkmasterflex on December 15, 2010, 10:44:02 AM
Very smart move, chances of Temple being better than they are now slim to none.  If Miami turns it around under Golden and becomes a top 5-10 program there would be a very good chance D'Onofrio gets a much better HC gig.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on December 15, 2010, 12:35:20 PM
this is why we need to hire mike leach
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: DH on December 15, 2010, 02:07:37 PM
pretty sure donald trump aint gonna help get that done
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on December 15, 2010, 11:04:30 PM
so d'onofrio was ready to take the job and golden talked him out of it

then temple president ann weaver hart padlocked his office door shut and had security escort him off campus.

and thats how we do in north philly
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on December 15, 2010, 11:06:46 PM
Pitt took Miami OH's coach Haywood.  The MAC is wide open again. ha
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on December 17, 2010, 02:19:01 PM
Jim Delany is surprised by the overwhelmingly negative reaction to "Leaders" and "Legends" and is considering renaming the divisions.

LOL @ the Big "10"
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on December 17, 2010, 03:20:50 PM
a condescending and out of touch old white man is surprised that people think hes condescending and out of touch. wow.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on December 19, 2010, 11:24:50 AM
Maryland is forcing Friedgen into retirement and a buyout so they can hire Mike Leach
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on December 19, 2010, 11:42:03 AM
Bold move.  Only problem with it is that Friedgen is a good coach.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on December 20, 2010, 11:30:43 AM
The following gentleman have interviewed for the vacancy at Temple:

Ron Vanderlinden - PSU linebackers coach (Didn't Golden have that job prior to Temple?)
Tom Bradley - PSU defensive coordinator
Charley Molnar - Notre Dame offensive coordinator
Steve Addazio - Florida offensive coordinator/OL coach under Meyer
Matt Rhule - Temple offensive coordinator


MDS loves this list.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on December 20, 2010, 12:41:44 PM
Frank Beamer wins the inaugural Joseph V. Paterno coach of the year award.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on December 20, 2010, 12:42:48 PM
what did james madisons coach win?
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on December 20, 2010, 12:44:23 PM
He made his $750 Christmas bonus a reality.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on December 20, 2010, 01:12:38 PM
Quote from: FastFreddie on December 20, 2010, 11:30:43 AM
The following gentleman have interviewed for the vacancy at Temple:

Ron Vanderlinden - PSU linebackers coach (Didn't Golden have that job prior to Temple?)
Tom Bradley - PSU defensive coordinator
Charley Molnar - Notre Dame offensive coordinator
Steve Addazio - Florida offensive coordinator/OL coach under Meyer
Matt Rhule - Temple offensive coordinator


MDS loves this list.

addazio is apparently a terrific recruiter, though he is italian so immediately he becomes untrustworthy.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Drunkmasterflex on December 20, 2010, 08:59:59 PM
Quote from: FastFreddie on December 20, 2010, 11:30:43 AM
The following gentleman have interviewed for the vacancy at Temple:

Ron Vanderlinden - PSU linebackers coach (Didn't Golden have that job prior to Temple?)

Tom Bradley - PSU defensive coordinator
Charley Molnar - Notre Dame offensive coordinator
Steve Addazio - Florida offensive coordinator/OL coach under Meyer
Matt Rhule - Temple offensive coordinator


MDS loves this list.

Before he was UVAs D coordinator
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on December 20, 2010, 09:20:44 PM
hell be lucky to be psu's lb coach after the disaster that will be his miami reign
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on December 21, 2010, 10:00:51 PM
Todd, what's this about Bob Davie being the new coach?
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on December 21, 2010, 11:49:38 PM
NO

young gun who will get them spry young nergros
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on December 22, 2010, 02:42:39 PM
Addazio was supposed to go to Texas to coach the OL, but he changed his mind and took the Owls job
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on December 22, 2010, 03:11:09 PM
Tom Bradley and Bob Davie are sad.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on December 22, 2010, 10:45:53 PM
QuoteHe will not be facing any SEC defenses unless of course we make a BCS bowl.

interesting quote from a temple fan on addazio. this is their delusion.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on December 23, 2010, 11:10:10 AM
Addazio's press conf is on CSN right now.  The AD claims an "extraordinary number of people wanted this position"...

http://www.csnphilly.com/pages/live1
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on December 23, 2010, 11:28:03 AM
extraordinary might be stretching it but with people just watching a guy use the job as a springboard to go to miami i bet more people than you think wanted it

but all that shows is how truly a god awful job it is in that people want it because its so bad that if you win at all there you can flip it into something good
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on December 23, 2010, 12:10:59 PM
Ohio State players in trouble for trading autographs for tattoos.  This shtein is getting stupid.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on December 23, 2010, 12:38:48 PM
They also sold their BigTen championship rings off for a thousand each.  Since they each have to sit out half the season, I wouldn't be surprised if they jumped to the NFL instead...
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on December 23, 2010, 12:55:30 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on December 23, 2010, 11:28:03 AM
extraordinary might be stretching it but with people just watching a guy use the job as a springboard to go to miami i bet more people than you think wanted it

but all that shows is how truly a god awful job it is in that people want it because its so bad that if you win at all there you can flip it into something good

thats what the mac is

every coach over the last 10 years who has had even a little bit of success there has jumped on to something bigger. this year...golden leaves for the u, the maimi of ohio guy goes i think for pitt and the northern illinois guy leaves for minnesota.

only guy to hang around is frank solich at ohio and thats cause he already crashed and burned at nebraska and nobody is going to give him a second chance.

but you and people of your ilk love college football the way it is and want to see to 350 awful bowl games so why would you even complain
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on December 23, 2010, 02:40:54 PM
temple is different because they are so bad that a coach who stinks goes there does ok and gets the miami job

you can win at northern illinois or ohio and not be looked at as a good coach...but win at temple and you must be a genius...thats how bad the program is...golden gets the miami job which is infintely better than minny and pitt
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on December 23, 2010, 03:36:33 PM
Quote from: FastFreddie on December 23, 2010, 12:10:59 PM
Ohio State players in trouble for trading autographs for tattoos.  This shtein is getting stupid.

Pryor among five OSU players suspended for first five games of 2011.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on December 23, 2010, 03:46:03 PM
The NCAA is the worst organization in this country.What a crock of shtein
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on December 23, 2010, 05:09:58 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on December 23, 2010, 02:40:54 PM
temple is different because they are so bad that a coach who stinks goes there does ok and gets the miami job

you can win at northern illinois or ohio and not be looked at as a good coach...but win at temple and you must be a genius...thats how bad the program is...golden gets the miami job which is infintely better than minny and pitt

a lot of it had to do with where temple was and how laughably bad they were. golden got so many puff pieces written about him about how awful the program was and how amazing he was for turning it around.

meanwhile nevada has 0 football success and that old dude took over and within what, 3 years hes epicially beating boise and winning the wac (which is light years ahead of the mac). but hes in nevada and no one gives a shtein. golden is in philly and its news. and he didnt even win the mac or beat anybody. he couldnt even win the mac east.

but he played the game right and conned his way into a good job. this new guy wont be able to jump to miami, but if he wins he can go to rutgers or syracuse or something within 3-4 years.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on December 23, 2010, 06:58:24 PM
can anyone explain to me how it makes any sense whatsoever that these ohio state suspended players get to play in the bowl
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on December 23, 2010, 07:00:15 PM
pretty $ure E$PN and rating$ had $omething to do with it
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on December 23, 2010, 07:11:56 PM
thats why they did it...but how is it at all explained...i could see if they wanted them in the bowl and didnt suspend them at all...but to give them a huge suspension...five games imo is way much for this...but to go that far and just skip the bowl game...have they said how that is justified?
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on December 24, 2010, 11:06:43 PM
anyone read death to the bcs yet?

good read but im pretty sure havas' head would explode
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on December 25, 2010, 12:58:51 AM
Quote from: MDS on December 24, 2010, 11:06:43 PM
anyone read death to the bcs yet?

good read but im pretty sure havas' head would explode

I've been told it's a must read for any college football fan.

Oh and, Hawaii blows.  #24 in the country?  Please.  Absolutely manhandled by Tulsa tonight 62-35.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on December 30, 2010, 10:34:20 PM
wow @ today's games

first Army wins a bowl game for the first time since the mid 80s, then Kansas State gets screwed out of a tie because they were flagged for celebrating too much on a tying TD, then the last 2 minutes of this UNC/Tennessee game has been crazy w/ flags, reviews, time running out, time not running out, OT....

and there's still another game coming up with a few 1st-rd picks (Jake Locker, Prince Amukamara)
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on December 31, 2010, 01:21:19 AM
That Army win was cool and it was at SMU.  Nebraska looks like shtein right now against Washington.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on December 31, 2010, 03:43:08 AM
Nebraska looked a lot like the birds did on Tuesday night, no one gave a shtein.

Still can't believe that Kansas St. player was flagged for unsportsmanlike conduct for saluting the crowd after he scored.  Unbelievable.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on December 31, 2010, 04:47:19 AM
Holy shtein!  Watching this replay of the Music City Bowl.  What a total collapse by Tennessee.  3 personal fouls at the end of the 4th and start of OT.  Should have been 4 with a blatant late hit on that game tying drive by NC.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on December 31, 2010, 03:14:57 PM
miami either is throwing this game or completely given up...either way its a tragedy what they are doing
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: rjs246 on December 31, 2010, 03:30:46 PM
Yeah this game is an abortion.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Rome on December 31, 2010, 05:35:25 PM
I am seriously making a forune on that abortion.   I'm sure there's historical parallels but I'm too drunk to try and draw them.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Rome on December 31, 2010, 05:37:00 PM
shtein
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on December 31, 2010, 07:41:38 PM
alFRAUD golden will fix all of this...youll see
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on December 31, 2010, 07:54:23 PM
Lattimore out is huge.  Also I see that Rome's favorite restaurant owner S. Truett Cathy has handed the reigns to his son.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on December 31, 2010, 08:13:15 PM
florida states defensive speed...really their overall speed is much bigger than i thought it would be...sc oline looks like its standing still
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on December 31, 2010, 10:22:42 PM
Correct igy.  Seminoles have some incredible athletes.  This speed is frightening.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on January 01, 2011, 07:50:54 AM
SC could have won that game fairly easily even without Lattimore if Garcia had made any effort whatsoever to protect the ball.  I give the Cocks defense a lot of credit for forcing so many field goals.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Rome on January 01, 2011, 01:55:34 PM
farging holden mcgroin sucks ass.  two picks already.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Rome on January 01, 2011, 02:38:54 PM
dude's making a comeback, though.  damn, nice play there.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on January 01, 2011, 02:47:32 PM
apparently Michigan State isn't interested in playing since they were left out of a BCS bowl
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Rome on January 01, 2011, 03:09:56 PM
alabama is trouncing that ass.

Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on January 01, 2011, 03:31:18 PM
is there anything more unmemorable and anticlimactic than winning a bowl game?
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: SD on January 01, 2011, 03:48:05 PM
Quote from: MDS on January 01, 2011, 03:31:18 PM
is there anything more unmemorable and anticlimactic than winning a bowl game?

The Dallas/Eagles game tomorrow comes to mind
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: SD on January 01, 2011, 03:53:55 PM
Holy shtein Mcgloin sucks

They should have appeased Devlin by making him the starter when he was with PSU
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on January 01, 2011, 03:59:14 PM
Quote from: SD on January 01, 2011, 03:48:05 PM
Quote from: MDS on January 01, 2011, 03:31:18 PM
is there anything more unmemorable and anticlimactic than winning a bowl game?

The Dallas/Eagles game tomorrow comes to mind

i meant things that get an enormous amount of hype and people are really jacked for that almost always turn out to be pointless duds. and im not even talking about the pizza bowl, im talking about the rose, fiesta, sugar, etc.

the ncaa tournament is generally a huge letdown but theres almost always a string of games (early thursday 2010) or a game (title game) that make the whole thing worth it.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 01, 2011, 06:58:43 PM
memo to the ncaa...stop matching up big ten and sec teams in bowls
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on January 01, 2011, 08:29:16 PM
Watching Wisconsin in the last 6 1/2 minutes brought me back to the McNabb/Reid era.  Burned timeouts?  Check.  Dawdling around and huddling, making the entire game ride on the 2pt conversion... All so familiar.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on January 02, 2011, 02:55:03 AM
How true.  Watching the replay on ESPNU.  And what was with Gary Patterson calling off the Gatorade bath?  Waiting for the day when a coach turns around and clocks one off his own players.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on January 02, 2011, 06:07:58 AM
Patterson looks like an angry pedophile.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on January 02, 2011, 03:42:45 PM
UConn's coach Edsall is taking over at Maryland
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Drunkmasterflex on January 03, 2011, 09:48:11 PM
That play Tyrod Taylor made on his touchdown pass was as ridiculous as they come.   :o
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: DH on January 03, 2011, 11:08:31 PM
yea it was..the rest of the game has kinda sucked though
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on January 04, 2011, 06:43:00 AM
Luck would be retarded to stay in school.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: DH on January 04, 2011, 08:13:55 AM
luck is going to be an nfl hof'r...and i dont mean a cornelious ingram type of hof'r.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on January 04, 2011, 09:34:50 AM
So, the Panthers should basically tell Clausen to go farg himself?
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on January 04, 2011, 09:52:29 AM
He's an icehole so yes
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: DH on January 04, 2011, 09:55:26 AM
they can draft mcgloin, id still tell clausen to farg himself. i hate that little prick.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on January 04, 2011, 11:57:59 AM
Quote from: DH on January 04, 2011, 09:55:26 AM
they can draft mcgloin

I would shtein myself with glee if he left early!

TMQ says this better than I could:
QuoteOnly the NCAA Could Think One Person Is "Themselves" In the Kansas State-Syracuse bowl game, Adrian Hilburn scored a touchdown with a minute remaining to pull Kansas State to within two points. Hilburn briefly saluted the Kansas State cheering section behind that end zone where he scored; zebras called that unsportsmanlike conduct, marching the Wildcats' 2-point try back to the 18. Syracuse stopped the deuce and won. Thus the penalty essentially handed the inaugural New Era Pinstripe Bowl to Syracuse. The game was being played in New York City, see? Syracuse is a New York team, see? The mob put the fix in to make sure the New York team won, see? The whole game was fixed by the mob, see?

There you go, tabloids -- "ESPN says game was 'fixed by the mob.'" Obviously I don't mean this. The trouble is, it's a better explanation than that NCAA officials think a three-second salute by a guy who just scored a touchdown is a reason to throw a flag that in effect awards the game to the other team.

TMQ hates the celebration penalty. As long as there is no taunting, and there was none by Kansas State, why shouldn't players dance happily after a touchdown? Nearly all football fans, players and coaches hate the celebration penalty -- why does it exist? The current NCAA stance seems to be that football players not graduating is a minor matter, athletes who break rules will be overlooked whenever bowl revenue is involved, but don't you dare act happy! Especially bizarre is the NCAA notion that celebration fouls should be a "point of emphasis." Punishing players for jumping around happily is a point of emphasis, while helmet-to-helmet hits are rarely flagged? Even considering the NCAA's reputation for hypocrisy, this is a bit much. The celebration rule (at the high school and NFL levels, too) needs a serious revamping.

After the game, referee Todd Geerlings said the penalty was justified because officials judged Hilburn "to be drawing attention to themselves, and that's what the flag was for." Set aside that your kindergarten teacher would flunk that sentence. Here's the NCAA rule: Unsportsmanlike celebration is "Any delayed, excessive, prolonged or choreographed act by which a player attempts to focus attention on himself (or themselves)." What Hilburn did was not delayed, excessive, prolonged or choreographed -- although he did draw attention to himself. The rule doesn't forbid drawing attention to yourself. It forbids "any delayed, excessive, prolonged or choreographed act." Hilburn did not violate the wording of the rule. Even an NCAA official who doesn't know the difference between "himself" and "themselves" should understand the wording of rules.

Along comes the next bowl, North Carolina at Tennessee. On one Volunteers touchdown, the receiver did a choreographed dance as a teammate leapfrogged him; on another, the receiver danced elaborately, then a teammate lifted him into the air. No flag in either case. Rules are supposed to be consistent. The NCAA celebration rule seems enforced entirely according to the whim of whoever is working the game.

Reader Chris Gillard of Atlanta adds that "drawing attention" happens constantly in football and is almost never flagged: "If celebration is bad, shouldn't there be an excessive celebration penalty for the defensive player who gets a sack and then runs 10 yards jumping around, thumping his chest and gesturing to the fans?" I watched the South Carolina-Florida State second half with this in mind, and counted 14 instances of a player who had just made a sack or big tackle or had a big gain dancing wildly on the field, flexing his biceps, chest-bumping with a teammate or doing a bit or choreography. No flags. How come celebrating a touchdown is a grievous offense but celebrating a tackle is unregulated? Fix this embarrassing rule.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on January 04, 2011, 12:49:25 PM
And did not the Tennessee quarterback do a slit throat gesture all be it a "mild" one after one of his touchdowns?  NCAA, what a load of bullshtein.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on January 04, 2011, 03:10:47 PM
rich rod OUT
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on January 04, 2011, 03:12:31 PM
How much coin will Michigan offer Jim Harbaugh?
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Drunkmasterflex on January 04, 2011, 03:17:09 PM
Supposedly Harbaugh isn't interested in the Michigan job. 
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on January 04, 2011, 03:19:47 PM
hes going to SF

michigan has to poach patterson from tcu or petterson from boise. and by poach, i mean pay them more than nick saban
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on January 04, 2011, 03:21:59 PM
Quote from: Drunkmasterflex on January 04, 2011, 03:17:09 PM
Supposedly Harbaugh isn't interested in the Michigan job. 

Quote from: MDS on January 04, 2011, 03:19:47 PM
hes going to SF

I think you guys sometimes forget how persuasive money can be.  Unless Harbaugh hated playing at Michigan, he'll listen.  And they'd much rather pay him "Saban money" than the pedophile or the blue turf guy.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on January 04, 2011, 03:25:03 PM
hes not going to POS big 10 michigan when he can stay in house and coach in the nfl
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on January 04, 2011, 03:27:52 PM
The NFC West is the Big Ten of the NFL.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 04, 2011, 03:37:03 PM
i cant imagine any coach who wants to go pro taking a college job over a pro offering of any kind

just like the coach of tcu or boise is not turning down michigan as long as they are being offered at least one penny more than they currently make
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Eagles_Legendz on January 04, 2011, 03:55:25 PM
Jim Grobe turned down Arkansas to stay at Wake after the Orange Bowl in 06...

...which was dumb for him and turned out to be not so hot for Wake either.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 04, 2011, 04:07:17 PM
arkansas is not michigan...you dont turn down michigan unless like alabama is offering
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Drunkmasterflex on January 04, 2011, 04:35:23 PM
Michigan though they have been down is by far one of the most premiere college football gigs.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: DH on January 04, 2011, 04:37:30 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 04, 2011, 04:07:17 PM
you dont turn down michigan unless like alabama is offering

schiano did and he's at rutgers for shteins sake
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Drunkmasterflex on January 04, 2011, 04:44:58 PM
He is probably regretting that now.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on January 04, 2011, 04:47:10 PM
Michigan will hire Brady Hoke.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on January 04, 2011, 04:47:55 PM
boy his star faded out fast, didnt it
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 04, 2011, 07:23:41 PM
Quote from: DH on January 04, 2011, 04:37:30 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 04, 2011, 04:07:17 PM
you dont turn down michigan unless like alabama is offering

schiano did and he's at rutgers for shteins sake

hes a moron
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on January 05, 2011, 12:54:19 AM
Excellent game tonight. Great second half.  That blocked punt was off the charts.  Horrible decision by Mallett.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: DH on January 05, 2011, 02:11:12 PM
Quote from: MDS on January 04, 2011, 04:47:55 PM
boy his star faded out fast, didnt it

holy farg, did it ever
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on January 06, 2011, 02:24:16 PM
Paralyzed Rutgers player showing more improvement (http://www.nj.com/rutgersfootball/index.ssf/2011/01/paralyzed_rutgers_lineman_eric.html)

farging scary shtein, still.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on January 06, 2011, 02:40:16 PM
Luck is returning to Stanford.  wow
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on January 06, 2011, 04:08:32 PM
probably got scared by the cba, i would think
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: DH on January 06, 2011, 04:19:48 PM
did he not see what happened to locker by staying an extra year?? im shocked.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on January 07, 2011, 01:56:46 PM
Incredible read about Phil Knight essentially owning Oregon football (http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2011/writers/michael_rosenberg/01/06/oregon.knight/index.html?eref=sihp)
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on January 07, 2011, 03:41:24 PM
FCS championship tonight in Texas... Delaware is a heavy favorite over Eastern Washington.  Pat Devlin has only thrown 2 picks this year - one was tipped by his receiver and the receiver was interfered with (but not called) on the other one.

Anyone know if this will be on TV?  More interesting than LSU/A&M....
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on January 07, 2011, 04:08:39 PM
7PM, ESPN 2 and ESPN 3.  Know quite a few people who made the trip down to Texas for it.  Delaware sucks right?
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 07, 2011, 04:33:23 PM
Quote from: Seabiscuit36 on January 07, 2011, 04:08:39 PM
Delaware sucks right?

is that rhetorical?
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Munson on January 07, 2011, 04:42:27 PM
Quote from: Seabiscuit36 on January 07, 2011, 04:08:39 PM
7PM, ESPN 2 and ESPN 3.  Know quite a few people who made the trip down to Texas for it.  Delaware sucks right?

A lotttt of folks i know made the trip down there. Some road tripped it. Hardcore.


I'm gonna be at BWW on Elkton RD tonight I think, though Grotto's is a possibility. Wearing a ridiculous blue and yellow mohawk trapper hat.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on January 08, 2011, 10:34:59 AM
Wow they blew that lead
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 08, 2011, 10:46:31 AM
couldnt happen to a worse state

ex penn state qb loses to ex smu qb.....penn state sucks
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on January 08, 2011, 12:28:12 PM
Flacco lost the title game also.  I think that Jim Harbaugh should draft Devlin.  Then next year's 49ers at Ravens matchup can feature Harbaugh on Harbaugh crime as well as Blue Hen on Blue Hen crime.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on January 08, 2011, 01:23:12 PM
delaware is the crime
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Munson on January 08, 2011, 03:45:01 PM
lol at these two tools.



What a farging train wreck of a 4th quarter. Unreal.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on January 09, 2011, 05:22:39 AM
Quote from: Seabiscuit36 on January 08, 2011, 10:34:59 AM
Wow they blew that lead

Talked to your bro yesterday.  He was pissed.  Started to take it out on the birds.  Get ready for the angry texts later today.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on January 09, 2011, 10:47:06 AM
Ha, i know they're coming
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on January 09, 2011, 01:43:05 PM
cf scary ranks

1. a reese/cole conversation
2. ff using google
3. shorebird after 2 beers
4. donho and sb's obvious real life man love
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on January 09, 2011, 02:55:22 PM
We love you too Todd.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on January 10, 2011, 08:08:42 PM
Missouri coach Gary Pinkel declined a chance to interview for Michigan head coaching job.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on January 10, 2011, 08:54:21 PM
looks like Tulsa's coach, not Tom Bradley, is getting the Pittsburgh job

Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: SunMo on January 10, 2011, 09:03:13 PM
5 weeks off certainly did these teams well.

good call NCAA!!
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on January 10, 2011, 09:08:44 PM
You don't think the audience loves seeing a defensive struggle?

Holy shtein with Oregon's shoes/socks.  I don't know if I hate them or love them.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: SunMo on January 10, 2011, 09:10:09 PM
it's probably just me, but i am really creeped out seeing a bunch of adults yelling and going crazy for unpaid kids playing college football.  i mean, alumni have a stake in it, same with the families, but the rest of them...why?  it's weird.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on January 10, 2011, 09:14:59 PM
if you live in alabama what the farg else are you gonna do

for people down here its high school kids
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: SunMo on January 10, 2011, 09:17:38 PM
even weirder
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on January 10, 2011, 09:19:39 PM
coaches get run out of town when they dont make the playoffs for one season

today everyone is gushing over a 13 year old who was in some middle school all star game

its 10000x times worse than you can even think of
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: SunMo on January 10, 2011, 09:20:34 PM
yeah, i've read Friday Night Lights...thanks.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on January 10, 2011, 09:21:30 PM
really? good for you, john.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on January 10, 2011, 09:45:19 PM
wow....Addazio is already checking into the open UConn job
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: SD on January 10, 2011, 11:43:38 PM
Quote from: SunMo on January 10, 2011, 09:10:09 PM
it's probably just me, but i am really creeped out seeing a bunch of adults yelling and going crazy for unpaid kids playing college football.  i mean, alumni have a stake in it, same with the families, but the rest of them...why?  it's weird.

I feel the same way when I see a bunch of white people cheering for black athletes.

Not really....

but Reggie White does...or did.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on January 11, 2011, 12:54:06 AM
Auburn wins the glass ball (for now) on a walkoff FG

5 years in a row for the SEC, and Nick Fairley might be heading to the Panthers.  beast
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on January 11, 2011, 04:27:48 AM
Fairley was a beast.  I started watching him in the second half.  Guy is going to be a stud at the next level.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on January 11, 2011, 04:33:32 AM
Quote from: MDS on January 10, 2011, 09:19:39 PM
coaches get run out of town when they dont make the playoffs for one season

today everyone is gushing over a 13 year old who was in some middle school all star game

its 10000x times worse than you can even think of

Youth sports is so out of control.  I coach basketball at the club level here, U14 and it's just frightening how many parents have their kids in every basketball camp in town all weekend long.  They all think their kid is the next great thing.  Let your kid enjoy life and have a little fun.  It really is sickening.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 11, 2011, 08:02:20 AM
the 4th place team in the sec WEST was alabama.....ridic
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: DH on January 11, 2011, 09:04:57 AM
maybe he knows he's gonna have to give it back in 3 years, but newtons excitement level after the fg wasnt nearly where it should have been for a kid who led his school to its first championship in 53 years..

and bama being 4th is off the charts ridiculous
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on January 11, 2011, 01:03:58 PM
Les Miles has also turned down Michigan.  Brady Hoke time.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on January 11, 2011, 01:09:15 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 11, 2011, 08:02:20 AM
the 4th place team in the sec WEST was alabama.....ridic

Holy shtein.  The SEC is another realm.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on January 11, 2011, 01:12:00 PM
Quote from: DH on January 11, 2011, 09:04:57 AM
maybe he knows he's gonna have to give it back in 3 years, but newtons excitement level after the fg wasnt nearly where it should have been for a kid who led his school to its first championship in 53 years..

and bama being 4th is off the charts ridiculous

Was he beat up?  He looked like he was in pain near the end of the game.   Looked like he was inflicting more pain on the Ducks as he was bigger than most of Oregon's defensive personnel.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 11, 2011, 01:30:36 PM
Quote from: FastFreddie on January 11, 2011, 01:03:58 PM
Les Miles has also turned down Michigan.  Brady Hoke time.

espn boastin on their ticker lat night that joe schad reporting that if offered the job miles would def take it


man has michigan fallen when alums start turning the job down
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on January 11, 2011, 01:34:37 PM
Quote from: Don Ho on January 11, 2011, 01:09:15 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 11, 2011, 08:02:20 AM
the 4th place team in the sec WEST was alabama.....ridic

Holy shtein.  The SEC is another realm.

Very true, but the SEC East was not very good at all.  If Matt McGloin didn't suck, they would have recorded zero bowl victories.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on January 11, 2011, 02:01:42 PM
lsu
ark
bama
auburn

im sure tcu would do just fine there, igy.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 11, 2011, 02:04:10 PM
Quote from: FastFreddie on January 11, 2011, 01:34:37 PM
Quote from: Don Ho on January 11, 2011, 01:09:15 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 11, 2011, 08:02:20 AM
the 4th place team in the sec WEST was alabama.....ridic

Holy shtein.  The SEC is another realm.

Very true, but the SEC East was not very good at all. 

except they werent very good compared to the sec

florida and south carolina finish at worst second/third in the big ten big east acc or pac ten....in the sec they were like the 5th 6th or 7th best teams
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 11, 2011, 02:11:09 PM
Quote from: MDS on January 11, 2011, 02:01:42 PM
lsu
ark
bama
auburn

im sure tcu would do just fine there, igy.

theyd do about as well as wisconsin in the sec....think 7-6 8-5 record
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on January 11, 2011, 02:18:28 PM
well of course...no one can realistically compete with the sec

the only people who would argue that are old timer big 10 fans and the other cf
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 11, 2011, 02:22:54 PM
but you still think tcu deserved to be in the title game as much as ore or auburn?

Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on January 11, 2011, 02:24:55 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 11, 2011, 01:30:36 PM
Quote from: FastFreddie on January 11, 2011, 01:03:58 PM
Les Miles has also turned down Michigan.  Brady Hoke time.

espn boastin on their ticker lat night that joe schad reporting that if offered the job miles would def take it


man has michigan fallen when alums start turning the job down

Didn't Feva go to Michigan?  He could be approaching the top of their list of candidates.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 11, 2011, 02:26:41 PM
hed be an improvement over brody hake
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on January 11, 2011, 02:48:22 PM
Under the current rules there was no doubt the title game was right

But the current roles are horrendous and oregon and auburn should actually have to show they are better than tcu, ohio st, boise, etc.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on January 11, 2011, 03:01:12 PM
No one wants to see this debated again.  Shut up.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 11, 2011, 03:07:55 PM
i dont want to debate it i just found it funny that the lil guy agreed that tcu is just another middle of the pack sec team yet all season was using them as a reason why the system sucks
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: DH on January 11, 2011, 04:45:32 PM
Hoke to Michigan..great hire.

Last time Michigam hired a coach from SDSU, they won the NCAA basketball title.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: phattymatty on January 11, 2011, 05:09:38 PM
ummm...no?
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on January 11, 2011, 05:14:32 PM
Quote from: FastFreddie on January 04, 2011, 04:47:10 PM
Michigan will hire Brady Hoke.

I called this a week ago.  My Michigan friends are texting me and very angry.

My source was my dad.  And he knows shtein.  No farging idea where he got his inside information.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: DH on January 11, 2011, 05:24:19 PM
completely screwed that up..my bad

thought steve fisher came from sdsu, not went there after he left michigan

carry on
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: DH on January 11, 2011, 05:25:07 PM
Quote from: FastFreddie on January 11, 2011, 05:14:32 PM
Quote from: FastFreddie on January 04, 2011, 04:47:10 PM
Michigan will hire Brady Hoke.

I called this a week ago.

Mike Francesca called this well before RichRod got canned.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Rome on January 11, 2011, 05:33:25 PM
You might say their future prospects now rest on a Hoke & a prayer.

MIGHT.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on January 11, 2011, 06:00:08 PM
I hoke you die. 
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 11, 2011, 06:08:55 PM
Quote from: DH on January 11, 2011, 05:25:07 PM
Quote from: FastFreddie on January 11, 2011, 05:14:32 PM
Quote from: FastFreddie on January 04, 2011, 04:47:10 PM
Michigan will hire Brady Hoke.

I called this a week ago.

Mike Francesca called this well before RichRod got canned.

i dont know about calling it but yeah his named has been floating about for weeks
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Rome on January 11, 2011, 06:13:50 PM
Quote from: Sgt PSN on January 11, 2011, 06:00:08 PM
I hoke you die. 

That's what it's all about.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on January 11, 2011, 06:42:23 PM
Quote from: Rome on January 11, 2011, 06:13:50 PM
Quote from: Sgt PSN on January 11, 2011, 06:00:08 PM
I hoke you die. 

That's what it's all about.

Do the Hoooooooke Pokie!
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on January 19, 2011, 11:57:42 AM
Score another victory for the BCS (http://www.realclearsports.com/articles/2011/01/12/another_near-perfect_season_for_bcs_97186.html)
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on January 19, 2011, 12:04:31 PM
that was so good i could swear bill hancock wrote it

long live bowl games!
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 19, 2011, 12:12:11 PM
Quote from: FastFreddie on January 19, 2011, 11:57:42 AM
Score another victory for the BCS (http://www.realclearsports.com/articles/2011/01/12/another_near-perfect_season_for_bcs_97186.html)

brilliant piece and it all sounds so familiar....

Quote
However, those who implemented the BCS couldn't have anticipated its effect on college football's already extraordinary regular season. In the past, fans in the South or Midwest didn't particularly care whether Oregon beat Oregon State, and fans in the Midwest or West didn't much care whether Auburn beat Alabama. Under the BCS, that has changed profoundly, as fans of teams in one region are now glued to games in other regions. As Bill Plaschke of the Los Angeles Times writes, the BCS has "transformed the sport from a Saturday afternoon cookout to a national obsession."

What other sports' regular season could justly be characterized as a "national obsession"? The NFL regular season is widely watched, to be sure, but with the same intensity? Good NFL teams' starters often don't even play in their final game or two. And is anyone obsessed with the four months of quasi-exhibition games that predate college basketball's season-ending tournament?

Let's quickly recap this splendid college football season. Oregon overcame a 21-3 deficit to beat Stanford in a game that - as was clear by season's end - decided which of those teams would play for the national championship. At Alabama, Auburn rallied from a 24-0 deficit to win 28-27 and eventually join the Ducks in the title game. And Nevada rebounded from a 24-7 deficit to upset Boise State in overtime, knocking the Broncos from the ranks of the unbeaten and ending their Cinderella run. If college football had a playoff, these dramatic games would merely have tweaked teams' playoff seedings.

Undefeated TCU became the first team from a non-major conference to play in the Rose Bowl since, well, ever - beating the Big Ten's bruising Wisconsin Badgers, 21-19, to claim a title that the Horned Frogs' players will carry with them for the rest of their lives: "Rose Bowl champions." The game marked the seventh time in seven years that a team from a lesser-known conference has played in one of the major bowls (now called "BCS bowls.") To put that into perspective, prior to the BCS no such team had played in such a bowl since Air Force played in the 1971 Sugar Bowl.

In impressive performances, Alabama dominated Big Ten co-champion Michigan State, 49-7, in the Capital One Bowl, and Stanford dominated Atlantic Coast Conference champion Virginia Tech, 40-12, in the Orange Bowl. Then, in the BCS National Championship Game, undefeated Auburn (which had beaten Alabama) beat previously undefeated Oregon (which had beaten Stanford), 22-19, on a field goal on the season's final play.

With the best regular season in all of sports, a championship game that's more - not less - likely to feature the two best teams, and a full slate of colorful bowl games attended by participating teams' real fans (who have enough advanced notice to plan such trips over the holidays), college football is nearly perfect. The sport may confound the casual fan, but those who love it increasingly recognize the truth of this claim: This is college football's golden age.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on January 19, 2011, 12:17:25 PM
yes lets point to 3 games played between the 2 best teams in their respective conferences as justification for this joke and insult of a system

then lets pander and pat the little kids in tcu on the head and say he guys you got to go to the rose bowl! good for you! its not a national title but its a game against a crappy big 10 team from wisconsin! fun!

then take us through a pack of horrible bowl games where tops 1 or 2 were noteworthy.

you do realize these games could simply be replicated during a 6 or 8 team playoff while still having nearly the same meaning during the regular season. i dont know. stubborn white people do as they do, dont they, michael.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on January 19, 2011, 12:19:44 PM
Quote from: MDS on January 19, 2011, 12:17:25 PM
these games could simply be replicated during a 6 or 8 team playoff while still having nearly the same meaning during the regular season

False.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on January 19, 2011, 12:25:33 PM
yea instead of needing 0 losses to play for the title you can slip up once and still get in

massive change

go through past years top 10s...more often than they are entirely 0 and 1 loss teams. meaning those are the squads that would generally get into the tourney. meaning the regular season is still important and not watered down ala college hoops.

in fact take a look at cubans post on how horrendous non conference regular season is....its staggeringly bad and everyone ignores this in their defense of the bcs and regular season. none of these teams challenge themselves outside of their own conferences and really only the sec has a leg to stand on in that mindset. the pac 10 blows outside of 2-3 teams, the big 10 is a farce except for ohio st, etc.

http://blogmaverick.com/2011/01/17/how-bcs-schools-use-cupcakes-to-impact-rankings-more-than-don-king-does-for-boxing/
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 19, 2011, 12:25:50 PM
Quote from: MDS on January 19, 2011, 12:17:25 PM
yes lets point to 3 games played between the 2 best teams in their respective conferences as justification for this joke and insult of a system

then lets pander and pat the little kids in tcu on the head and say he guys you got to go to the rose bowl! good for you! its not a national title but its a game against a crappy big 10 team from wisconsin! fun!

then take us through a pack of horrible bowl games where tops 1 or 2 were noteworthy.

you do realize these games could simply be replicated during a 6 or 8 team playoff while still having nearly the same meaning during the regular season. i dont know. stubborn white people do as they do, dont they, michael.


Quote
The sport may confound the casual fan, but those who love it increasingly recognize the truth of this claim: This is college football's golden age.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 19, 2011, 01:21:00 PM
Quote from: MDS on January 19, 2011, 12:25:33 PM
http://blogmaverick.com/2011/01/17/how-bcs-schools-use-cupcakes-to-impact-rankings-more-than-don-king-does-for-boxing/

wow is cuban a moron....lets compare college football to boxing...makes perfect sense

also cfb generally breaks down like this

12 games
9 conf
3 ooc

so if you take the bcs teams who all for the most part have tough conference schedules (big east is the exception) that leaves three games which to work with

heres a breakdown of the top 20 aq schools ooc skeds against other aq's

auburn - clemson
oregon - tennessee
ohio state - miami
oklahoma - fla state (air force)
lsu - north carolina, west virginia
bama - penn state
arkansas - tex am
okie state - tex am
mich state - notre dame
miss state - none
vt - none ( boise state)
fla state - oklahoma, florida
mississippi - illinois
tex am - okie state, arkansas
nebraska - wash

so they all schedule at least one other bcs opponent..some schedle two...which means btwn 33 and 66% of their ooc opponents are quality bcs teams...absolutely nothing wrong with that and probably a higher % than cbb where you can lose ten times and win the national championship
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on January 19, 2011, 01:39:17 PM
stop comparing hoops to football

its two separate entities

this is just an endless debate that is going nowhere but for the love of god please dont consider the big 10 or acc or even mostly the pac 10 a tough conference with tough schedules

Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 19, 2011, 02:42:12 PM
Quote from: MDS on January 19, 2011, 01:39:17 PM
stop comparing hoops to football

its two separate entities

so is boxing


Quote from: MDS on January 19, 2011, 01:39:17 PM
this is just an endless debate that is going nowhere but for the love of god please dont consider the big 10 or acc or even mostly the pac 10 a tough conference with tough schedules


they absolutely are...just because they arent as good as the sec doesnt mean going undefeated thru one of their schedules isnt tough

sec = late 80's/early 90's nfc east
rest of bcs conf. = nfc east now
big east = 2010 nfc west
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on January 25, 2011, 03:01:25 PM
congratulations are in store for havas, bill hancock, jim delany and the rest of the cartel....you guys deserve it

http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=6057405
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 25, 2011, 03:18:32 PM
high five!?
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on January 25, 2011, 03:27:19 PM
its a good thing the sugar bowl ceo got this money....same with the bowl scouts. couldnt do it without the hard work of those guys.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 25, 2011, 03:48:20 PM
i got my money too.... won third place in the bowl pool this year....does that count?
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on January 25, 2011, 03:56:05 PM
no it doesnt

you can still make your money even if there is a 6 or 8 team playoff because there will always be bowls. they cant.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on January 25, 2011, 04:06:56 PM
I don't understand why you can't muster more appreciation for the BCS. It's way better than the previous bowl system.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on January 30, 2011, 11:05:35 PM
QuoteSpencer Reid, the youngest of Eagles coach Andy Reid's five children, has given a verbal commitment to play football at Temple.

Reid, a 5-10, 205-pound running back who also played defense, spent his senior season at Harriton High School after transferring from St. Joseph's Prep.

He also was being recruited by Delaware.

sweet, sweet nepotism
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: SD on January 30, 2011, 11:14:27 PM
I met him at camp last year. He's the 'good one'.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: QB Eagles on January 30, 2011, 11:17:46 PM
Wouldn't it be nepotism if he was signed by the Eagles? Pretty sure Reid doesn't coach Temple.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on January 30, 2011, 11:19:16 PM
eagles done a lot of favors for temple over the years

now they get them back
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on January 31, 2011, 09:40:14 AM
They better check his rectum for balloons.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 31, 2011, 01:11:21 PM
temples party scene just got better by ten fold
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on January 31, 2011, 01:25:30 PM
well on the bright side he wont have to walk too far from his dorm to buy some oxy
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 31, 2011, 01:26:31 PM
or sell it
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Drunkmasterflex on January 31, 2011, 07:48:24 PM
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncaa/recruiting/football/news/story?id=5652297 (http://sports.espn.go.com/ncaa/recruiting/football/news/story?id=5652297)

Interesting article on the ESPN 150, seems like most of the guys didn't really pan out.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on January 31, 2011, 08:00:21 PM
I only read the first 2 pages, but I'd imagine that the numbers are pretty similar (percentage wise) as when college stars get drafted into the NFL. 
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Drunkmasterflex on January 31, 2011, 08:05:30 PM
Probably
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: phattymatty on January 31, 2011, 08:54:55 PM
great conversation gentlemen.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Drunkmasterflex on January 31, 2011, 10:00:01 PM
I actually had some other thoughts, but I was too lazy to type them. 
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on February 15, 2011, 11:25:25 AM
espn couldnt find anything better than miami/maryland for its labor day night game

what backroom deal forced them to go with maryland?
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on February 15, 2011, 11:37:25 AM
Edsall fever.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 15, 2011, 12:35:13 PM
md +3.5 please
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on February 15, 2011, 12:37:35 PM
ahhh ive figured it out

espn and the acc just signed a 12 year deal and this is a byproduct of that

game is at maryland, too

uh oh goes alfraud golden
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on February 16, 2011, 12:33:13 AM
hearing more good things about a notre dame/temple series beginning in 2013

would be a 2/1 and looking like its gonna go down

also psu/temple picks back up in 2014 so for 2 years temple will play both psu and notre dame and get them at home in back to back years

holla
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on February 16, 2011, 06:28:18 AM
You are excited to add four more high profile losses to the schedule?
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 16, 2011, 09:20:18 AM
i dont think notre dame or penn state are high profile to anyone but temple
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on February 16, 2011, 11:48:18 AM
Very true. We're talking in relative terms here.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on February 16, 2011, 11:51:09 AM
temples normal ooc games are against uconn, maryland and rutgers

not exactly big time teams there

the fact that they can get psu and nd to agree to 2 for 1s to big...for temple
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 16, 2011, 11:54:05 AM
it has nothing to do with temple...its a game that allows their players to play in an nfl stadium...its a recruiting tool as well as a reward for their fanbases as it gives them a chance to see a game without going to middle america to do it

theres probably more nd fans in jersey than in indiana

if temple is in virginia neither play them EVER
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on February 16, 2011, 11:59:11 AM
oh i know nd is and to a certain extent psu are using temple for the 1 game nfl stadium deal and recruiting in philly thing

but 10 years ago nd wasnt giving them a home game and probably wouldnt even play them

of course nd is a farcical joke but that isnt the point. temple!
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 16, 2011, 12:02:42 PM
Quote from: MDS on February 16, 2011, 11:59:11 AM
but 10 years ago nd wasnt giving them a home game and probably wouldnt even play them


meaningless...they didnt play in the linc ten years ago....there is not a chance ever that temple gets psu or nd at "home" if not for the stadium...and not nd at all...psu played them because they are in philly

im actually surprised that nd was willing to play on campus at rutgers
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on February 16, 2011, 12:05:05 PM
Actually, they didn't. It's all a big conspiracy. That game was filmed at a soundstage in LA.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 16, 2011, 12:12:46 PM
its just like a road conference game to them...no different than psu playing at purdue every other year...but what surprises me is that they didnt play at the meadowlands
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on February 16, 2011, 12:20:15 PM
so youre telling me nd wasnt down for playing at the vet?

and i think this has slightly less to do with playing in a cookie cutter nfl stadium and more with appeasing east coast nd fans and recruiting. im guessing the nyc people like the sound of a 90 minute drive to philly rather than 3 hr drive to fedex or bodymore.

in fact im pretty sure nd has 1 east coast game a year and this was simply the best they could do for 2014.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 16, 2011, 12:23:31 PM
no they didnt want the vet when they could play in the meadowlands...and now with the new meadowlands up i wouldnt be surprised if this is the last time they play in the linc
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on February 16, 2011, 12:28:14 PM
oh no doubt....its not still 100% official and theres of course a good chance they could set up a made for tv game at the meadowlands instead of playing temple

but then they wouldnt get free home wins in 13 and 15...so you tell me brian kelly.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on February 16, 2011, 03:50:38 PM
http://www.philly.com/philly/sports/colleges/temple/Sources__Owls_to_play_Notre_Dame_in_football.html

official now

hooray for still thinking its 1945
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on March 02, 2011, 10:55:01 AM
yay Penn State is top 5 in something (http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2011/writers/the_bonus/02/27/cfb.crime/index.html)
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 02, 2011, 11:12:30 AM
So how many schools are top 5 in players with criminal records and also top 5 in graduation rate?
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Rome on March 02, 2011, 11:58:41 AM
  It's easier to get a degree there than it is to get arrested, so...
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on March 02, 2011, 12:28:14 PM
temples 2011 sked is out
Quote
SEPTEMBER
1 VILLANOVA TBA
10 at Akron TBA
17 PENN STATE TBA
24 at Maryland TBA
OCTOBER
1 TOLEDO TBA
8 at Ball State TBA
15 BUFFALO TBA
22 at Bowling Green TBA
29 BYE TBA
NOVEMBER
2 at Ohio* 8 p.m.
9 MIAMI (Ohio)* 8 p.m.
19 ARMY TBA
25 KENT STATE**# TBA
DECEMBER
2 MAC Championship

check out the back to back igy special in sept...vs. psu then @ umd

also the nov 19 jew bowl between me and diehard

a fun year that might very well end up with a bid to the pizza bowl.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: DH on March 02, 2011, 04:33:57 PM
im glad army is playing temple in philly this year...at least ill get to go to the linc once this fall
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: smeags on March 02, 2011, 04:47:49 PM
think i will go to the temple / psu game.

are temple fans rough ?
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on March 07, 2011, 11:58:22 PM
http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/football/news?slug=ys-osuprobe030711

Jim Tressel knew about the memorabilia sale by Pryor and others.

QuoteIf Tressel failed to inform Smith or the Ohio State compliance department about the players' dealings with Rife, he could be charged with multiple NCAA violations including unethical conduct, failure to monitor and a failure to promote an atmosphere of compliance. In general, a coach is required to act on, or pass along reasonable information about possible rule violations for further investigation.

Section 4.1(d) of Tressel's contract with Ohio State stipulates that he "supervise and take appropriate steps to ensure ... members of the Team know, recognize and comply with any such laws, University Rules and Governing Athletic Rules and immediately report to the (Athletic) Director and to the (Athletic) Department's Office of Compliance Services in writing if any person or entity, including without limitation, representatives of Ohio State's athletic interests, has violated or is likely to violate any such laws, University Rules and Governing Athletic Rules."

Section 5.1 (m) of his contract also states that failure to promptly report "any violations" could lead to "termination by Ohio State for cause."

I think this is bullshtein (the NCAA regulating sales and things like this) but it appears that if this is all true the Coach Sweatervest could be in some deep shtein.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 08, 2011, 07:44:47 AM
they could put his sweater on an urban outfitters manaquin next year and theyd still outcoach penn state
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 08, 2011, 08:26:18 AM
Unnecessary comment, fargface.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on March 11, 2011, 12:21:02 PM
QuoteIf there is an NFL lockout, do you think it will positively affect Temple football? With no NFL games, will the football starved Philly fans come to Temple games for their football fix?

from the temple board...anyone want to take a stab at it?
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: smeags on March 11, 2011, 12:26:34 PM
i might tailgate but i would only go into the psu game.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 11, 2011, 12:28:31 PM
Quote from: MDS on March 11, 2011, 12:21:02 PM
QuoteIf there is an NFL lockout, do you think it will positively affect Temple football? With no NFL games, will the football starved Philly fans come to Temple games for their football fix?

from the temple board...anyone want to take a stab at it?

self delusion knows no limits
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on March 29, 2011, 04:51:10 PM
so the guy who runs the fiesta bowl (yes, its a full time 6-figure job to run a once a year event) was fired today because he spent company money on numerous strip club visits. in 2008.

down with a playoff! more bowl games! pay these men more money! dont give the players any money!
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on April 03, 2011, 01:17:04 PM
central arkansas new field

(http://mit.zenfs.com/214/2011/04/Central-Arkansas-Field.jpg)
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on April 15, 2011, 02:28:30 PM
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=6361845

hooray for old white people
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on April 15, 2011, 02:52:14 PM
QuotePenalties called after the player crosses the goal line still will be assessed on those plays, but live-ball fouls will be assessed at the spot of the foul and eliminate the score.

Whether or not you like or dislike the taunting penalty is one thing, but this rule makes sense.  Taunt before the endzone and the penalty is enforced at the spot of the foul just the same as say a facemask or illegal block would be. 

The NCAA is entireley too anal about what it considers taunting, but that's neither here nor there in regards to this particular rule change. 
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on April 15, 2011, 02:57:45 PM
just wait until a game is decided because one ref determined that some act was a taunt when the same thing happened a week earlier and it wasnt called

a hold is a hold a facemask is a facemask. taunting is sort of you know it when you see it and everyone has their only little trigger for that.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on April 15, 2011, 03:01:40 PM
I agree...but your problem is with the taunting rule itself.  As for this new rule, it's hard to argue against the logic behind it. 
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: DH on April 15, 2011, 03:14:47 PM
im getting real tired of AD's like central arkansas' who are only trying to make a name for themselves by changing the turf on its field. gdammit, footbal is played on green grass or green fake grass. thats it. 
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on April 15, 2011, 03:17:18 PM
What about Boise St?  They've had that blue field for like 20+ years now, right?
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on April 15, 2011, 03:18:35 PM
boise state was the OG....i think die hard is talking about these awful followers
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: DH on April 15, 2011, 04:06:39 PM
boise is blue, eastern wash is blood red, now this.

all it is are AD's trying to get their schools on tv. worked for boise, worked for esu..
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on April 20, 2011, 02:34:41 AM
umass to the mac in 2012

most likely they agreed to the move because temple is going to be in there for awhile

if delaware grows a pair of balls, maybe we can form some kind of reject east coast conference, maybe even getting nova by letting them use the soccer stadium in chester (which appears to be the deal breaker for them in the big east). add in buffalo and some random ass florida schools and have some fun.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: DH on April 20, 2011, 09:07:19 AM
so you want to make the big east even worse than it already is? also, im not even sure i knew umass had football.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on April 20, 2011, 12:02:38 PM
lol

i want to make a worse version of the big east. no one will leave a decent conference for my pretend conference, so its all about getting east coast AA schools to move up and stealing teams from the sun belt and mac.

its basically instead of playing toledo and direction michigan schools, wed play umass, delaware, nova, non conference games against navy and army, etc. i dont know, it would be football only and we wouldnt have to fly to shteinholes like ypsilanti and bowling green.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on April 20, 2011, 12:14:35 PM
i think what you really mean is that temple should move down and join the a-10.....that actually makes sense unlike whatever you are babbling about
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on April 20, 2011, 12:20:52 PM
that would make a lot of sense, but they already had their shot to move down and didnt do it

so here we are, making up pretend horrible conferences
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on May 04, 2011, 12:32:10 AM
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/04/sports/ncaafootball/04sportsbriefs-BOISESTATEIS_BRF.html (http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/04/sports/ncaafootball/04sportsbriefs-BOISESTATEIS_BRF.html)

Always wondered how they got kids to go there.  Most of the violations were against the tennis team but footbal program was also guilty of several infractions.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on May 04, 2011, 06:42:43 PM
Justice Dept wants to know why there isn't an NCAA FB playoff system (http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=6479279)

QuoteWASHINGTON -- The Justice Department wants to know why the NCAA doesn't have a college football playoff system and says there are "serious questions" about whether the current format to determine a national champion complies with antitrust laws.

Ok, so even though I'm totally in favor of a playoff system, this doesn't seem like something that the feds need to be getting involved with at this point.  Smaller schools who have shown the ability to compete with the big boys are getting BCS bowl bids.  And typically at most, you've got like 2 maybe 3 schools getting ranked in the top 25 that have legit BCS bowl aspirations.  Seems like a witch hunt to me.  The gov't needs to find another way to waste my tax dollars. 
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: Don Ho on May 04, 2011, 06:56:21 PM
Time to send in Special Ops and storm the NCAA Compound.

Agree, waste my tax dollars on something else.
Title: Re: 2010 College Football Thread
Post by: MDS on May 11, 2011, 06:11:07 PM
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=6527759

lol @ the bcs, what a joke. fraudulent hypocritical jokes. continues to bring college football down to nhl legitimacy levels.