the random musings not worthy of new thread thread

Started by ice grillin you, March 28, 2006, 02:06:37 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Sgt PSN

Quote from: Father Demon on January 04, 2010, 03:08:00 PM
Mom tattoos her kids, says it should be alright since "they my child"

Linky

i'm sure there are plenty of reasons that those 2 idiots shouldn't be allowed to raise children,  but after thinking about it for a minute, giving them tattoos isn't a legit reason to take them away.  sure, the thought of a 10 year old kid with a tattoo is a bit odd, but is it really any different than letting them get their ears pierced?  hell, down in la you've got parents buying their 15 yr old daughters boob jobs for their birthday.  so why should a tattoo be any different? 

of course, there's no way that parents should be able to do it themselves with a home made tattoo gun.  they should have to go to a licensed tattoo artist.  but farg it, if a kid wants a tattoo and the parents are ok with it, then why should anyone have a problem with it?   

rjs246

Is rjs gonna have to choke a bitch?

Let them eat bootstraps.

Rome

any parent that allows their 10 year old child to get a farging tattoo should be incinerated with a flamethrower.

Sgt PSN

why?  the kid will suffer enough when he's 30 and rocking a stretched out spongebob tattoo on his bicep.  he'll never get laid, thus the rest of society never has to worry about him breeding so the stupid gene he got from his parents will die with him.  which will probably be shortly after he contracts aids from some cheap hooker looking to score money for rocks.

not to mention, it will give us plenty of things to laugh and mock younger generations about.  so how is this a bad thing?


Eagaholic

Much ado about nothing. The mom probably put the tats on as a means of identification, in case her kids get mixed up with a bunch of other people's, and they have to tell them apart.

Yeti

If I had a kid I would get "BERZERKER" tatooed across their forehead.
"It's only a matter of time before we get to the future."

Hbionic

General_Failure

What's really odd is she put "funhole destroyer" on the kid with the largest head.

The man. The myth. The legend.

rjs246

Quote from: Rome on January 04, 2010, 05:52:58 PM
any parent that allows their 10 year old child to get a farging tattoo should be incinerated with a flamethrower.


I agree with this as well.

In summary, who cares if these redneck fargwad kids get tattooed? If they want them and their parents are cool with it the government shouldn't take them away or say one word about it. What business is it of anyone else's if they are all doing what they want with no objections? Simultaneously, everyone involved with this story could get blow-torched and the world would be much better off. Kids included.
Is rjs gonna have to choke a bitch?

Let them eat bootstraps.

Tomahawk

Quote from: Yeti on January 04, 2010, 06:55:52 PM
If I had a kid I would get "BERZERKER" tatooed across their forehead.

Your kid would have to be a siamese twin which makes it all the more awesome

Yeti

"It's only a matter of time before we get to the future."

Hbionic

PhillyGirl

"Oh, yeah. They'll still boo. They have to. They're born to boo. Just now, they'll only boo with two Os instead of like four." - Larry Andersen

rjs246

Is rjs gonna have to choke a bitch?

Let them eat bootstraps.

PhillyPhanInDC

I lied my ass off and swindled the gov to buy a new firewall that allows me to post here from work. Just got done installing it. Yay taxpayers.
"The very existence of flamethrowers proves that some time, somewhere, someone said to themselves, "You know, I want to set those people over there on fire, but I'm just not close enough to get the job done.""  R.I.P George.

Yeti

"It's only a matter of time before we get to the future."

Hbionic

phillymic2000