Political Hippo Circle Jerk - America, farg YEAH!

Started by PoopyfaceMcGee, December 11, 2006, 01:30:30 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Cerevant

Quote from: rjs246 on September 09, 2008, 04:29:55 PM
Who's jumping off a bridge you friggin drama queen?

IGY, you egocentric bitch.
An ad hominem fallacy consists of asserting that someone's argument is wrong and/or he is wrong to argue at all purely because of something discreditable/not-authoritative about the person or those persons cited by him rather than addressing the soundness of the argument itself.

PhillyGirl

"Oh, yeah. They'll still boo. They have to. They're born to boo. Just now, they'll only boo with two Os instead of like four." - Larry Andersen


PoopyfaceMcGee

Quote from: ATV on September 09, 2008, 05:25:16 PM
Lower taxes for moderately income folks.
Getting us out of Iraq.
Maintaining pro-choice.
Obeying the Constitution.
Affordable healthcare.
and on, and on.....

Lower INCOME taxes.  Plenty of other taxes to make up for it.

You do understand that combat is ending in Iraq regardless, right?  Concerns about future military endeavors would be much more valid.

Ah, yes.  This is totally an issue worth mentioning, because Roe v. Wade doesn't have a 30+ year precedent.

Obeying which interpretation of the Constitution?

More affordable or "free" health care for everyone means shteintier health care for anyone that has it already.  Good stuff.  But don't worry, you can move to Canada where Cerevant "knows a guy."

MadMarchHare

Absconding all our fundamental rights under the guise of "STAY SCARED" doesn't fit into any of the Constitution I read.....
Anyone but Reid.

ice grillin you

Quote from: FastFreddie on September 09, 2008, 07:48:27 PM

Lower INCOME taxes.  Plenty of other taxes to make up for it.

You do understand that combat is ending in Iraq regardless, right?  Concerns about future military endeavors would be much more valid.

Ah, yes.  This is totally an issue worth mentioning, because Roe v. Wade doesn't have a 30+ year precedent.

Obeying which interpretation of the Constitution?

More affordable or "free" health care for everyone means shteintier health care for anyone that has it already.  Good stuff.  But don't worry, you can move to Canada where Cerevant "knows a guy."


you really are a bush schill..more than i even ever thought

funny you mention roe v wade having a 30 year precdedent then mention bushes sullying of the constitution....because before this admin widespread spying of our citizens had a never before precendent so sorry if some people arent comforted by a 30 year precedent

oh and mccains tax plan will send us into debt much defaster and deeper than obamas
i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

PoopyfaceMcGee

Based on only the tax plans, yes, the national debt would be ridiculous under McCain.

His spending plan is decidedly lighter, however, so it's really a wash.


As I said, what we really need is more revenue and less spending.  Neither candidate offers that, and both aren't doing jack shtein to figure out why we don't net nearly as much tax dollars as we collect.

General_Failure

Quote from: MadMarchHare on September 09, 2008, 08:01:02 PM
Absconding all our fundamental rights under the guise of "STAY SCARED" doesn't fit into any of the Constitution I read.....

Wait, you're still allowed to read that government document?

The man. The myth. The legend.

ice grillin you

Quote from: FastFreddie on September 09, 2008, 08:15:06 PM
Based on only the tax plans, yes, the national debt would be ridiculous under McCain.

His spending plan is decidedly lighter, however, so it's really a wash.


As I said, what we really need is more revenue and less spending.  Neither candidate offers that, and both aren't doing jack shtein to figure out why we don't net nearly as much tax dollars as we collect.

what is mccains spending plan...not saying he doesnt have one but i havent seen any concrete info on his fiscal plans except to continue the bush tax cuts...i try not to read any candidates website but is that where mccains plan is....or can you link it elsewhere
i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

PoopyfaceMcGee


MadMarchHare

Quote from: ice grillin you on September 09, 2008, 08:08:35 PM
Quote from: FastFreddie on September 09, 2008, 07:48:27 PM

Lower INCOME taxes.  Plenty of other taxes to make up for it.

You do understand that combat is ending in Iraq regardless, right?  Concerns about future military endeavors would be much more valid.

Ah, yes.  This is totally an issue worth mentioning, because Roe v. Wade doesn't have a 30+ year precedent.

Obeying which interpretation of the Constitution?

More affordable or "free" health care for everyone means shteintier health care for anyone that has it already.  Good stuff.  But don't worry, you can move to Canada where Cerevant "knows a guy."


you really are a bush schill..more than i even ever thought

funny you mention roe v wade having a 30 year precdedent then mention bushes sullying of the constitution....because before this admin widespread spying of our citizens had a never before precendent so sorry if some people arent comforted by a 30 year precedent

oh and mccains tax plan will send us into debt much defaster and deeper than obamas

Ever hear of Joe McCarthy?  The No Such Agency?
Come on, I hate Bush as much as the next guy, but the gov't has been spying on its people since at least WWII.
Anyone but Reid.

PhillyGirl

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/9/9/18288/12935?detail=f

If you want to be thoroughly revolted, you can read this Kos diary about the most vile, disgusting below-the-belt McCain ad yet. I look forward to the counter-attack. McCain must rot. (The ad twists legislation that Obama had his hand in to help kindergartners ID sexual predators and prevent abuse into "Obama wants to teach sex education to kindergartners before teaching them how to read.") McCain is a disgusting, filthy man. :puke farging shameful.


Quote
"It is shameful and downright perverse for the McCain campaign to use a bill that was written to protect young children from sexual predators as a recycled and discredited political attack against a father of two young girls - a position that his friend Mitt Romney also holds. Last week, John McCain told Time magazine he couldn't define what honor was. Now we know why," said Obama campaign spokesman Bill Burton.
"Oh, yeah. They'll still boo. They have to. They're born to boo. Just now, they'll only boo with two Os instead of like four." - Larry Andersen

MadMarchHare

Quote from: PhillyGirl on September 09, 2008, 09:02:27 PM
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/9/9/18288/12935?detail=f

If you want to be thoroughly revolted, you can read this Kos diary about the most vile, disgusting below-the-belt McCain ad yet. I look forward to the counter-attack. McCain must rot. (The ad twists legislation that Obama had his hand in to help kindergartners ID sexual predators and prevent abuse into "Obama wants to teach sex education to kindergartners before teaching them how to read.") McCain is a disgusting, filthy man. :puke farging shameful.


Quote
"It is shameful and downright perverse for the McCain campaign to use a bill that was written to protect young children from sexual predators as a recycled and discredited political attack against a father of two young girls - a position that his friend Mitt Romney also holds. Last week, John McCain told Time magazine he couldn't define what honor was. Now we know why," said Obama campaign spokesman Bill Burton.

No offense, but saying the DailyKos has a liberal bias is accurate and understated.
Anyone but Reid.

PhillyGirl

Watch the farging revolting ad yourself.

Forget where I found it, its a MCCAIN AD. Its not made up by KoS.

You can find it anywhere...YouTube, TV, anywhere. :puke
"Oh, yeah. They'll still boo. They have to. They're born to boo. Just now, they'll only boo with two Os instead of like four." - Larry Andersen

ice grillin you

just taking a quick look ay mccains proposals there no possible way his tax cuts can be supported by his supposed cuts in spending...and to even get close he must have some ugly cuts out there that hes not mentioning

the fact is taxes need to go up if we wanna make up any ground on this deficit and his whole plan is based on tax cut after tax cut


Quote from: MadMarchHare on September 09, 2008, 08:59:52 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on September 09, 2008, 08:08:35 PM
Quote from: FastFreddie on September 09, 2008, 07:48:27 PM

Lower INCOME taxes.  Plenty of other taxes to make up for it.

You do understand that combat is ending in Iraq regardless, right?  Concerns about future military endeavors would be much more valid.

Ah, yes.  This is totally an issue worth mentioning, because Roe v. Wade doesn't have a 30+ year precedent.

Obeying which interpretation of the Constitution?

More affordable or "free" health care for everyone means shteintier health care for anyone that has it already.  Good stuff.  But don't worry, you can move to Canada where Cerevant "knows a guy."


you really are a bush schill..more than i even ever thought

funny you mention roe v wade having a 30 year precdedent then mention bushes sullying of the constitution....because before this admin widespread spying of our citizens had a never before precendent so sorry if some people arent comforted by a 30 year precedent

oh and mccains tax plan will send us into debt much defaster and deeper than obamas

Ever hear of Joe McCarthy?  The No Such Agency?
Come on, I hate Bush as much as the next guy, but the gov't has been spying on its people since at least WWII.

mcarthy was one man who went unchecked..but eventually he was brought down when unable to substantiate his claims...under bush it is the highest levels of our govt systematically spying on people without a care in the world...i would put watergate closer to bush than mcarthy but neither come close to the scope of our current admin

and for the record i have no doubt the govt has in one way or another spied on poeople in the past...but the brazenness with whihc the bush admin has shtein on the constitution in numerous different aspects is frightening
i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous