ConcreteBoard

Eagles => Eagles Talk => Topic started by: SunMo on November 18, 2007, 10:40:06 PM

Title: Pats Talk
Post by: SunMo on November 18, 2007, 10:40:06 PM
Things More Likely to Happen Than The Eagles Winning Sunday:

Tammy Reid winning the Mother of the Year award
Bill Belichick NOT looking like a fag on the sidelines
Danny Boy changing the nickname of the football team in Washington
Al Michaels not slobbering all over them the entire game
Dio watching the game on TV
Munson hitting puberty
Mussa discovering a cure for cancer
IGY and PG spending an afternoon reflecting on their friendship
MDS giving a quarter to a homeless black person


Title: Re: Things More Likely Than The Eagles Beating the Pats On Sunday
Post by: MDS on November 18, 2007, 10:43:51 PM
SunMo not giving his friend Dave a handjob
SunMo not giving his friend Brian a rimjob
SunMo not taking it up the ass from his friend Greg
Title: Re: Things More Likely Than The Eagles Beating the Pats On Sunday
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on November 18, 2007, 10:45:31 PM
The Mayor actually looking like a normal person
Title: Re: Things More Likely Than The Eagles Beating the Pats On Sunday
Post by: QB Eagles on November 18, 2007, 10:45:36 PM
This thread being funny.
Title: Re: Things More Likely Than The Eagles Beating the Pats On Sunday
Post by: Munson on November 18, 2007, 11:01:44 PM
Quote from: QB Eagles on November 18, 2007, 10:45:36 PM
This thread being funny.

WinnAr. Lock.
Title: Re: Things More Likely Than The Eagles Beating the Pats On Sunday
Post by: rjs246 on November 18, 2007, 11:58:31 PM
72-11

Bet me.
Title: Re: Things More Likely Than The Eagles Beating the Pats On Sunday
Post by: Cerevant on November 19, 2007, 06:13:52 AM
Quote from: MDS on November 18, 2007, 10:43:51 PM
SunMo not giving his friend Dave a handjob
SunMo not giving his friend Brian a rimjob
SunMo not taking it up the ass from his friend Greg

He did admit to getting "rear ended" on Sunday...
Title: Re: Things More Likely Than The Eagles Beating the Pats On Sunday
Post by: SunMo on November 19, 2007, 08:23:23 AM
95% of CF being able to participate in a funny thread
Title: Re: Things More Likely Than The Eagles Beating the Pats On Sunday
Post by: Rome on November 19, 2007, 08:26:24 AM
AIDS jokes making a comeback on CF.
Title: Re: Things More Likely Than The Eagles Beating the Pats On Sunday
Post by: Magical_Retard on November 19, 2007, 08:28:26 AM
is this happened before? 2 straight sunday night games for the pats? any other team get that b4?

as for things more likely to happen: madden talking about how tom brady and the pats are the real deal.

Title: Re: Things More Likely Than The Eagles Beating the Pats On Sunday
Post by: SunMo on November 19, 2007, 08:28:53 AM
Donovan McNabb hosting next year's VIBE awards
Title: Re: Things More Likely Than The Eagles Beating the Pats On Sunday
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on November 19, 2007, 09:04:39 AM
Me not posting from my phone at least once between now and kickoff.
Title: Re: Things More Likely Than The Eagles Beating the Pats On Sunday
Post by: PhillyPhanInDC on November 19, 2007, 09:20:01 AM
Me watching any portion of this inevitable embarrassment.
The Eagles correcting any of their GLARING deficiencies in the offseason
McNabb being traded next year
Me not taking a gigantic, most glorious dump Thursday evening.
Title: Re: Things More Likely Than The Eagles Beating the Pats On Sunday
Post by: Feva on November 19, 2007, 09:41:42 AM
Quote from: SunMo on November 19, 2007, 08:28:53 AM
Donovan McNabb hosting next year's SOURCE awards

There ya go, big guy...
Title: Re: Things More Likely Than The Eagles Beating the Pats On Sunday
Post by: hbionic on November 19, 2007, 11:21:04 AM
Eagles shooting a homerun, right before tip-off in the college stanley cup of canada's Euro-league.
Title: Re: Things More Likely Than The Eagles Beating the Pats On Sunday
Post by: PhillyGirl on November 19, 2007, 11:37:47 AM
Me growing 3 inches to hit the 5'3 I so desperately want to be.
Title: Re: Things More Likely Than The Eagles Beating the Pats On Sunday
Post by: ice grillin you on November 19, 2007, 11:51:38 AM
because of mcnabbs injury i cant find anywhere that has this game on their board

guesses on what it will start off at?

18.5 is my guess


Title: Re: Things More Likely Than The Eagles Beating the Pats On Sunday
Post by: Feva on November 19, 2007, 11:56:09 AM
In that scenario... I'd love the Eagles with the points.


Look at the matchups!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!




Yes... I'm farging kidding.  I wouldn't touch the Eagles if you gave me 35 points.
Title: Re: Things More Likely Than The Eagles Beating the Pats On Sunday
Post by: RezRob on November 19, 2007, 12:46:19 PM
Stephen A. Smith arguing w/o playin the race card.
Title: Re: Things More Likely Than The Eagles Beating the Pats On Sunday
Post by: Phanatic on November 19, 2007, 12:55:36 PM
Madden admitting that he would actually fellate Brady on camera right after his 5th TD pass to Stallworth is completed...
Title: Re: Things More Likely Than The Eagles Beating the Pats On Sunday
Post by: Don Ho on November 19, 2007, 02:01:45 PM
me not mentioning hawaii in any of my posts.  :-X
Title: Re: Things More Likely Than The Eagles Beating the Pats On Sunday
Post by: hbionic on November 19, 2007, 02:21:09 PM
Another Philadelphia Phillies or 76ers Championship.
Title: Re: Things More Likely Than The Eagles Beating the Pats On Sunday
Post by: methdeez on November 19, 2007, 02:28:06 PM
Me regretting not buying 4 tickets at $350 each for this ass-raping.
Title: Re: Things More Likely Than The Eagles Beating the Pats On Sunday
Post by: hbionic on November 19, 2007, 02:44:18 PM
Is that what a standard ticket goes for? Or do you have a box with a stripper and all you can eat buffet in it?
Title: Re: Things More Likely Than The Eagles Beating the Pats On Sunday
Post by: fansince61 on November 19, 2007, 03:15:37 PM
Rosie O'Donnell dives in front of GWB to stop an assassins bullet (fired by the president of ENRON) :o
Title: Re: Things More Likely Than The Eagles Beating the Pats On Sunday
Post by: methdeez on November 19, 2007, 03:26:43 PM
That's what standard tickets go for after .00425 seconds after they go on sale and scalper technology buys every single available ticket.
Title: Re: Things More Likely Than The Eagles Beating the Pats On Sunday
Post by: Magical_Retard on November 19, 2007, 03:31:21 PM
peace in the middle east
Title: Re: Things More Likely Than The Eagles Beating the Pats On Sunday
Post by: Yeti on November 19, 2007, 04:12:04 PM
Day turning to night.



That's right.  Birds pull off the upset.
Title: Re: Things More Likely Than The Eagles Beating the Pats On Sunday
Post by: pinoyboy2pt0 on November 19, 2007, 05:28:39 PM
an aborted fetus winning a dance contest
Title: Re: Things More Likely Than The Eagles Beating the Pats On Sunday
Post by: MadMarchHare on November 19, 2007, 06:43:02 PM
Quote from: Yeti on November 19, 2007, 04:12:04 PM
Day turning to night.



That's right.  Birds pull off the upset.

Yeti being correct about an Eagles upset.
Title: Re: Things More Likely Than The Eagles Beating the Pats On Sunday
Post by: Displaced on November 19, 2007, 07:53:35 PM
Quote from: PhillyGirl on November 19, 2007, 11:37:47 AM
Me growing 3 inches to hit the 5'3 I so desperately want to be.

At least you are as tall as all the Eagles corners.
Title: Re: Things More Likely Than The Eagles Beating the Pats On Sunday
Post by: shorebird on November 19, 2007, 08:10:58 PM
The Eagles drafting a pro-bowl wide reciever.
Title: Re: Things More Likely Than The Eagles Beating the Pats On Sunday
Post by: SunMo on November 19, 2007, 09:56:41 PM
http://www.vegasinsider.com/nfl/odds/las-vegas/

Eagles -23.5

hahahhahahhahahahahahahahah
Title: Re: Things More Likely Than The Eagles Beating the Pats On Sunday
Post by: QB Eagles on November 19, 2007, 10:17:06 PM
Over/under of 50.5. I'd take the Patriots and the over.
Title: Re: Things More Likely Than The Eagles Beating the Pats On Sunday
Post by: SunMo on November 19, 2007, 10:18:59 PM
it depends who plays quarterback, if it's not Donovan, i'd actually go Eagles and under because i'm pretty sure they'd run the ball and try to keep the ball away from New England
Title: Re: Things More Likely Than The Eagles Beating the Pats On Sunday
Post by: QB Eagles on November 19, 2007, 10:23:44 PM
A decent theory, but I have a feeling that what the Eagles try to do and what the Eagles successfully accomplish might be two different things this Sunday.
Title: Re: Things More Likely Than The Eagles Beating the Pats On Sunday
Post by: SunMo on November 19, 2007, 10:27:04 PM
good point
Title: Re: Things More Likely Than The Eagles Beating the Pats On Sunday
Post by: Eagaholic on November 19, 2007, 10:55:44 PM
plus, once Reid gets behind by 2 TDs (probably the first quater) he'll abandon any semblance of a running game plan

running for him is like saying no to food. he knows it's a good idea and will try it a few times, but in the end he just can't help himself.
Title: Re: Things More Likely Than The Eagles Beating the Pats On Sunday
Post by: Feva on November 20, 2007, 07:32:12 AM
Quote from: SunMo on November 19, 2007, 10:18:59 PM
it depends who plays quarterback, if it's not Donovan, i'd actually go Eagles and under because i'm pretty sure they'd run the ball and try to keep the ball away from New England

No it doesn't.  At all.  You can take the Patriots and laugh all the way to the bank.  The Eagles will not come within 30.  The Patriots will have 23.5 locked up by halftime.
Title: Re: Things More Likely Than The Eagles Beating the Pats On Sunday
Post by: ice grillin you on November 20, 2007, 08:41:25 AM
Quote from: QB Eagles on November 19, 2007, 10:17:06 PM
Over/under of 50.5. I'd take the Patriots and the to go over.
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: Rome on November 20, 2007, 09:35:49 AM
Humiliating.
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: ice grillin you on November 20, 2007, 09:43:49 AM
whats especially frightening about this game is the fact that for the last three games the eagles have gotten absolutely no pressure on the qb...one sack in the last 85 pass attempts and in general no pressure at all....

if the weather cooperates (right now theres a possibility of freezing rain) the pats could hit sixty
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: Magical_Retard on November 20, 2007, 09:48:54 AM
even if the weather is bad i believe it will help the pats. if its raining or snowing or whatever it will cause the eagles 2-3 turnovers. or 2-3 more than they will already cough up.
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: Wingspan on November 20, 2007, 09:51:06 AM
If the weather is bad, it is because that is the way Tom Brady prefers it.
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: Rome on November 20, 2007, 10:05:05 AM
No sacks against a rookie quarterback playing behind a patchwork offensive line.

They might score 60 against the Eagles in the first half.
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: Butchers Bill on November 20, 2007, 10:31:27 AM
The Eagles will win this game.

There were WMD's in Iraq.

Lee Harvey Oswald was the lone gunman.

George Bush is the best President evAr.

Andy Reid is a great father.
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: pinoyboy2pt0 on November 20, 2007, 12:49:30 PM
Pats 69 - Birds 6; McNabb dies.
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: hbionic on November 20, 2007, 01:10:53 PM
Quote from: Wingspan on November 20, 2007, 09:51:06 AM
If the weather is bad, it is because that is the way Tom Brady prefers it.

:-D :-D
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: mussa on November 20, 2007, 01:45:58 PM
REID - 0
SWEATSHIRT - 100
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: rjs246 on November 20, 2007, 01:46:11 PM
Quote from: pinoyboy2pt0 on November 20, 2007, 12:49:30 PM
Pats 69 - Birds 6; McNabb dies.

Everyone wins?
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: ice grillin you on November 20, 2007, 01:54:58 PM
just heard an amazing stat on wip

the eagles + all the teams theyve played this year have scored a combined 41 touchdowns

the patriots have scored 54
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: hbionic on November 20, 2007, 01:58:56 PM
I'm tired of all of this Patriot fellatioing.

I'm almost certain the Eagles will pull an upset.

Who else is in better position to do that than the Eagles.

No one gives them a chance in hell to win. Patriots are over confident.

McNabb needs to have a break out game, the defense needs to have a break out game.

This smells like an upset. I'm also tired of reading, hearing of how great the Patriots are. farg them. farg the north east. farg their stupid ass fans. farg Tom Brady. farg their 1 million touchdowns.

Suddenly everybody here wants to be a fan of every other team we're farging playing against.

'be realistic bionic, the eagles suck this year'.

news flash, they suck every year. I accepted it the day I chose to use 'we' when referring to the Eagles.


Everyone here is just as bad as madden swallowing Favres balls.

farg you.
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: rjs246 on November 20, 2007, 02:43:11 PM
All it took was two close wins over two zesty teams and all of a sudden people think this team can upset the Patriots? Go root for the taterskins, taterskins fans.
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: Rome on November 20, 2007, 02:47:37 PM
Anyone who seriously thinks the Eagles have a shot in this game is delusional.  Hell, I doubt even the Eagles players feel like they have a chance.

It's gonna be a blowout and it's gonna be an epically brutal one.
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: SunMo on November 20, 2007, 02:54:21 PM
take the shot the eagles have in the next dallas game, whatever that is 25 to 1, 30 to 1....and that is their odds to cover the spread sunday night
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: Cerevant on November 20, 2007, 03:00:05 PM
If the Pats were just coasting through the season, collecting wins against inferior opponents, I might be convinced that they could come out flat and be surprised by the Eagles.  It has happened to some team every year since the Dolphins won them all.

That's not how the Pats are playing.  They are systematically destroying teams, then kicking them when they are down just to make sure they are dead.  Then they piss on the corpses.  The Pats are playing angry, no holds barred, no mercy.  It is a beautiful thing to watch.  I wish it could have been the Eagles.
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: Rome on November 20, 2007, 03:08:47 PM
It could have been if the Eagles would have signed/drafted football players instead of choir boys.
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: hbionic on November 20, 2007, 03:27:32 PM
Cancer patients usually know they have no shot. But they still hope. And sometimes, they win.  It's the hoping part that drives me to care and watch the game. In the back of my mind, I know they are the eagles, so I lower the bar, if I didn't give a shtein, why the farg watch the game and bitch about it all week after the game.

I just ask for everyone to take Brady's dick out of their throats. Everyone makes him out to be God. farg him. farg him and his farging hot ass victoria secret girlfriend. farg his stupid 'oh, I'm a pretty boy, I didn't know that' look on his farging face. farg Bellichek or however the farg you spell his god damned name. farg him, farg harrison, farg teddy farging bruschi, farg mike vrabel and the fact that when he lines up on offense on less than 5 and goal that no one farging has a clue to cover him because he is going to catch it. farg the fact that those fargs got lucky and beat us in the superbowl, farg them, farg the tuck rule, farg farg their robotic uniforms, farg their name patriots, they stole it that name from a missile, farg their fans, their fans families, their fans families happiness and goals, farg boston, farg massachussetts, farg their stupid ass accent, farg their stupid ass record, farg them, farg them, farg them!

I refuse to give any 'props' to these slimy fargs. 

Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: ice grillin you on November 20, 2007, 03:32:45 PM
i dont know how you dont give props to the pats...they are doing things that boggle the mind...things that have never been done and never will be again...literally ever

as far as hope this is the first eagle game in my entire life where i had zero hope

its one thing to say no way the eagles are winning a game but deep down especially as the game gets closer the feeling that they are gonna win usually creeps into your psyche at least a little bit

but this game holds negative hope for me...im only watching to see how many points new england can put up and to see if mcnabb actually crys on the sideline
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: rjs246 on November 20, 2007, 03:36:25 PM
The Patriots are the best football team I have ever seen.
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: hbionic on November 20, 2007, 03:38:11 PM
Like I said in the other thread....what they are doing, I respect that. What everyone else is doing as far as letting the Patriot's accomplishments mind farg them is what I am pissed about. I'm just tired of hearing it. I'm tired of the smug faces on these farging patriots fans. Even though they don't talk shtein to me, they are laughing inside. I can hear it.


There's always that 1 ounce that thinks we can pull it off. Is that being a homer? Yes. Is that being a fan? Yes. Is that demented? Very much so.

farg these guys, they have alot of the guys we faced in the superbowl, so do we.

I just hope the eagles don't go down as easy as everyone's mouth's on the Pat's jocks.
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: ice grillin you on November 20, 2007, 03:42:12 PM
there are no patriot fans....thats one reason i can jump on their bandwagon


another unreal stat

the largest recorded nfl spread was 23 pts...in the last 25 years there have been 5 games at 20+

the patriots might have five games THIS year where they are favored by 20+


farg these guys, they have alot of the guys we faced in the superbowl

not really
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: PhillyandBCEagles on November 20, 2007, 04:05:35 PM
Quote from: rjs246 on November 20, 2007, 03:36:25 PM
The Patriots are the best football team I have ever seen.

Are you going to the game??

To answer the original thread title - me remembering any of the game
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: rjs246 on November 20, 2007, 04:16:19 PM
Quote from: PhillyandBCEagles on November 20, 2007, 04:05:35 PM
Quote from: rjs246 on November 20, 2007, 03:36:25 PM
The Patriots are the best football team I have ever seen.

Are you going to the game??


I had every intention of going. Then standing room only tickets were $100. Then real tickets were $250 each. Then I remembered that I don't want to spend my birthday being ignored or pitied by Patriots 'fans' that stopped watching the game after the third Patriots touchdown of the first quarter.
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: paco on November 20, 2007, 04:58:24 PM
Quote from: rjs246 on November 20, 2007, 04:16:19 PM
Quote from: PhillyandBCEagles on November 20, 2007, 04:05:35 PM
Quote from: rjs246 on November 20, 2007, 03:36:25 PM
The Patriots are the best football team I have ever seen.

Are you going to the game??


I had every intention of going. Then standing room only tickets were $100. Then real tickets were $250 each. Then I remembered that I don't want to spend my birthday being ignored or pitied by Patriots 'fans' that stopped watching the game after the third Patriots touchdown of the first quarter.

I was planning on going to this game as well, but decided on not going for the same reasons (overpriced tickets, paying to watch the eagles get their asses kicked, boston people).   I love going to away games as much as anyone, but really, whats the point for this one?
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: Don Ho on November 20, 2007, 05:15:56 PM
Quote from: paco on November 20, 2007, 04:58:24 PM
Quote from: rjs246 on November 20, 2007, 04:16:19 PM
Quote from: PhillyandBCEagles on November 20, 2007, 04:05:35 PM
Quote from: rjs246 on November 20, 2007, 03:36:25 PM
The Patriots are the best football team I have ever seen.

Are you going to the game??


I had every intention of going. Then standing room only tickets were $100. Then real tickets were $250 each. Then I remembered that I don't want to spend my birthday being ignored or pitied by Patriots 'fans' that stopped watching the game after the third Patriots touchdown of the first quarter.

I was planning on going to this game as well, but decided on not going for the same reasons (overpriced tickets, paying to watch the eagles get their asses kicked, boston people).   I love going to away games as much as anyone, but really, whats the point for this one?

fricken eh, that's just ridiculous.  the massacre at wounded knee was free.  wtf?
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: Don Ho on November 20, 2007, 05:19:16 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on November 20, 2007, 01:54:58 PM
just heard an amazing stat on wip

the eagles + all the teams theyve played this year have scored a combined 41 touchdowns

the patriots have scored 54

this is getting more encouraging by the minute.
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: rjs246 on November 20, 2007, 05:25:45 PM
Quote from: Don Ho on November 20, 2007, 05:15:56 PM
Quote from: paco on November 20, 2007, 04:58:24 PM
Quote from: rjs246 on November 20, 2007, 04:16:19 PM
Quote from: PhillyandBCEagles on November 20, 2007, 04:05:35 PM
Quote from: rjs246 on November 20, 2007, 03:36:25 PM
The Patriots are the best football team I have ever seen.

Are you going to the game??


I had every intention of going. Then standing room only tickets were $100. Then real tickets were $250 each. Then I remembered that I don't want to spend my birthday being ignored or pitied by Patriots 'fans' that stopped watching the game after the third Patriots touchdown of the first quarter.

I was planning on going to this game as well, but decided on not going for the same reasons (overpriced tickets, paying to watch the eagles get their asses kicked, boston people).   I love going to away games as much as anyone, but really, whats the point for this one?

fricken eh, that's just ridiculous.  the massacre at wounded knee was free.  wtf?

In other words, we all suck.
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: Don Ho on November 20, 2007, 05:29:53 PM
what do they charge for standing room only at the linc? 
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: shorebird on November 20, 2007, 05:46:10 PM
hbionic, I can't help but respect your diehard attitude. You have been here as long as anyone, including me.

I hate the Pats also, but I cant ignore what they are doing. It blew my friggen' mind when they signed Moss and AD this offseason. You knew right then that they would be very hard to beat. They're even better than anyone thought they would be. It's a fact, not knobslobbin'. Just like it's a fact that Farve is proving a lot of people wrong again, me included.

What really pisses me off is that while the idiots in the Eagles FO sit around with their thumbs up their asses, real teams like the Pats sign Stallworth, AD, Moss, and draft players that make impacts. The Eagles and Andy Reid couldn't, or wouldn't, draft a true no. 1 go to wide receiver if they had a gun to their head. Same thing goes with linebackers. And Free Agents?!? They only sign other teams cast offs, or get a decent player like Stallworth only to let him go when the price becomes too high for their tight wadded stupid asses, no matter how much he would mean to the team. They draft a guy like Dmac or Bwest and think that they can carry the team playing with the great offensive and defensive systems they have. New flash, their game plan sucks and every team in the league waits for JJ's blitzes and then eats them with bread. Farve was the perfect example this year. Brady will do even better.

The Pats make the moves and do the things that are required for Championships. They never stop bringing in pro-bowl talent. The Eagles constantly blow draft picks and hardly ever make a impact in free agency. The one time they did it blew up in their faces. Andy Reid's playbook would be hung on the toilet paper holder in Billecheks bathroom. He couldn't be a water boy on that team. This team isn't a pimple on the ass of a team like the Patriots.

And you know what? No matter how bad we get beat this week, and we will get beat, I guarantee that, Andy Reid will still be his stupid hardheaded ignorant self, saying I need to put my players in better position to make plays and so on. He won't learn a farging thing, no matter how many times McNabb gets sacked or how many pts. the Pats score on our D. It won't change a thing.
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: rjs246 on November 20, 2007, 06:13:27 PM
Quote from: Don Ho on November 20, 2007, 05:29:53 PM
what do they charge for standing room only at the linc? 

I think it's $90 but I've always been able to scalp tickets for around $100-$120. No such luck with Gillette, that I was able to find anyway.
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: Rome on November 20, 2007, 06:20:27 PM
I was going to go but then I remembered I'd rather perform a self-colonoscopy on myself than fly to Boston, spend hundreds of dollars on tickets, a room and food & beverages only to see the Eagles get slaughtered by five touchdowns.  If I'm lucky, that is.
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: rjs246 on November 20, 2007, 06:21:55 PM
You could have stayed with me, big guy.

Just kidding.
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: Diomedes on November 20, 2007, 06:22:35 PM
I can't think of any other time when the whole country, except of course for the Patriots fans (there are a few...I grew up in NE, I know...or their bandwagoners..these are the vast majority)...the whole country is rooting for the Eagles to win.  Or at least play dirty.
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: PhillyandBCEagles on November 20, 2007, 06:35:02 PM
Quote from: rjs246 on November 20, 2007, 06:13:27 PM
Quote from: Don Ho on November 20, 2007, 05:29:53 PM
what do they charge for standing room only at the linc? 

I think it's $90 but I've always been able to scalp tickets for around $100-$120. No such luck with Gillette, that I was able to find anyway.

Tickets on STubhub and Craigslist for aroudn $100
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: rjs246 on November 20, 2007, 06:40:13 PM
Too late. A month ago they were over twice that. And now I have no interest in going so stop tempting me, devil-woman.
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: JackStraw on November 20, 2007, 06:41:02 PM
See that's my thought - If you can't win then at least take some people out. But we have no Andre Waters or bounties or body bag mentalities here anymore. Crap if someone is running up the score take them out - who gives a farg about a $10k fine here or there. Maybe Cap'n Andy shoulda done that home a little more too.
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: Diomedes on November 20, 2007, 06:56:45 PM
When people first started floating the idea that the Pats/Brady deserved to be taken out by a dirty play, I didn't like it. 

I've come around.

What they did Sunday night was as classless as it gets, and taken in the context of the rest of this season so far, I now advocate for someone to take  Brady out.  I have nothing against the guy personally...in fact I like him.  Moreover, it's not his fault what's going on...Coach is responsible.  But you can't take Belichek out, so you gotta take one of his guys out.  It's as much a part of the game as going for it on 4th and 1 inside the 30 with a 30 point lead, afterall.
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: rjs246 on November 20, 2007, 07:01:33 PM
The fact that week in and week out opposing players and coaches are spewing quotes about it being their job to stop him, not his job to let up makes me sick. If someone is jamming a loss down your throat it's your duty to play dirty until they leave the field crying.
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: hbionic on November 20, 2007, 07:07:32 PM
Quote from: rjs246 on November 20, 2007, 07:01:33 PM
The fact that week in and week out opposing players and coaches are spewing quotes about it being their job to stop him, not his job to let up makes me sick. If someone is jamming a loss down your throat it's your duty to play dirty until they leave the field crying.

Quote from: Diomedes on November 20, 2007, 06:56:45 PM
When people first started floating the idea that the Pats/Brady deserved to be taken out by a dirty play, I didn't like it. 

I've come around.

What they did Sunday night was as classless as it gets, and taken in the context of the rest of this season so far, I now advocate for someone to take  Brady out.  I have nothing against the guy personally...in fact I like him.  Moreover, it's not his fault what's going on...Coach is responsible.  But you can't take Belichek out, so you gotta take one of his guys out.  It's as much a part of the game as going for it on 4th and 1 inside the 30 with a 30 point lead, afterall.

True and true.

This is the one and only game that the defense can show me that they are going to play like men and are not going to roll over as the scuds and the rest of the country thinks.

If they come out and play hard, just for once in their farging lives...just once, play hard nosed football, late hits, smash mouth, runyan-supermans, andrews-come-from-nowhere blocks, non-Hoyda type shtein, this season can go to hell and I would be a proud Eagles fan.

If they come out and roll over and play dead and wait for the asspounding to stop like a skinny guy in his first day in prison...then...I will stop watching Eagles games the rest of the season.

This game will do it for me. Play like men, keep me as a watching fan, play like Hoydas, lose a watching fan for the season.

This game is balls.


BELIEVE!
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: BushyTheBeaver on November 20, 2007, 07:16:06 PM
Quote from: Cerevant on November 20, 2007, 03:00:05 PM
If the Pats were just coasting through the season, collecting wins against inferior opponents, I might be convinced that they could come out flat and be surprised by the Eagles.  It has happened to some team every year since the Dolphins won them all.

That's not how the Pats are playing.  They are systematically destroying teams, then kicking them when they are down just to make sure they are dead.  Then they piss on the corpses.  The Pats are playing angry, no holds barred, no mercy.  It is a beautiful thing to watch.  I wish it could have been the Eagles.

Without a doubt the single best description of the Patriots season that I've read anywhere. Peter King, Prisco, Dr. Z, all those shmoes on ESPN...you just made all of them look like inarticulate hacks.   :yay
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: rjs246 on November 20, 2007, 07:23:31 PM
Which, of course, isn't difficult because they all ARE inarticulate hacks.
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: JackStraw on November 20, 2007, 07:52:47 PM
Quote from: Diomedes on November 20, 2007, 06:56:45 PM

But you can't take Belichek out, so you gotta take one of his guys out. 

I dunno - Akers is good for a sideline shot or two if he can get into position. Who cares if he gets ejected...not like they will have any need for PAT's or anything. Of course he'll only get one kick-off attempt in the game.
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: QB Eagles on November 20, 2007, 07:58:09 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on November 20, 2007, 01:54:58 PM
just heard an amazing stat on wip

the eagles + all the teams theyve played this year have scored a combined 41 touchdowns

the patriots have scored 54

Amazingly false, although I think perhaps you didn't hear the stat correctly.

The Eagles have scored 20 TDs, and they have allowed 19 TDs.
The Patriots have scored 46 TDs, and they have allowed 19 TDs.

The Patriots have still scored more TDs by themselves than have been scored in Eagles games by both sides, but that stat is true for just about any team that, like the Eagles, has a top 10 defense in terms of TDs allowed.
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: Rome on November 20, 2007, 08:03:11 PM
I would be a poor sport if I said that I hope Tom Brady gets Darryl Stingley'd out there on Sunday.
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: Diomedes on November 20, 2007, 08:07:34 PM
best case scenario is someone like Monte Reagor annihilates Randy Moss..breaks his knees.  Both of them.  How that might happen, who cares...it's nice to dream.
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on November 20, 2007, 08:13:18 PM
I'm all for Brady and/or Moss going down, but I actually like the way they're running up the score.  It's the way I wish my teams would play.  No farging mercy.
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: hbionic on November 20, 2007, 08:25:30 PM
True.
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: BushyTheBeaver on November 20, 2007, 08:44:34 PM
Quote from: QB Eagles on November 20, 2007, 07:58:09 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on November 20, 2007, 01:54:58 PM
just heard an amazing stat on wip

the eagles + all the teams theyve played this year have scored a combined 41 touchdowns

the patriots have scored 54

Amazingly false, although I think perhaps you didn't hear the stat correctly.

The Eagles have scored 20 TDs, and they have allowed 19 TDs.
The Patriots have scored 46 TDs, and they have allowed 19 TDs.

Actually the Pats HAVE scored 54 TDs. The stats you were looking at must have been from last week before the Buffalo game. But aside from that, yeah...there's no way they've scored more TDs than 10 other teams. Not even close. I think Dallas by themselves have 40 TDs. Maybe it's the six teams left on the schedule? Even that seems farfetched.
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: Munson on November 20, 2007, 08:51:08 PM
Quote from: FastFreddie on November 20, 2007, 08:13:18 PM
I'm all for Brady and/or Moss going down, but I actually like the way they're running up the score.  It's the way I wish my teams would play.  No farging mercy.

This. But...from a computer.
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on November 20, 2007, 09:21:00 PM
I'd be all for injuring Brady if Dallas wasn't having such a good year. They're a legit SB contender and I'd rather see the Pats spit and piss on every opponent they face on their way to another Championship then to see TO and Dallas get a ring.
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: QB Eagles on November 20, 2007, 10:15:02 PM
Quote from: BushyTheBeaver on November 20, 2007, 08:44:34 PM
Quote from: QB Eagles on November 20, 2007, 07:58:09 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on November 20, 2007, 01:54:58 PM
just heard an amazing stat on wip

the eagles + all the teams theyve played this year have scored a combined 41 touchdowns

the patriots have scored 54

Amazingly false, although I think perhaps you didn't hear the stat correctly.

The Eagles have scored 20 TDs, and they have allowed 19 TDs.
The Patriots have scored 46 TDs, and they have allowed 19 TDs.

Actually the Pats HAVE scored 54 TDs. The stats you were looking at must have been from last week before the Buffalo game. But aside from that, yeah...there's no way they've scored more TDs than 10 other teams. Not even close. I think Dallas by themselves have 40 TDs. Maybe it's the six teams left on the schedule? Even that seems farfetched.

Hm.. you're right. I got my stats from the same NFL.com page (http://www.nfl.com/standings) that shows them having ten wins. The Eagles number is off by two also. Perhaps NFL.com's standings only include offensive TDs? WIP got their numbers from Les Bowen's article today.

Edit: Looks like the NFL page just uses last weeks TD numbers mixed in with the rest of the stats updated through ten weeks. They're not too quick.
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: Magical_Retard on November 21, 2007, 07:39:39 AM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on November 20, 2007, 09:21:00 PM
I'd be all for injuring Brady if Dallas wasn't having such a good year. They're a legit SB contender and I'd rather see the Pats spit and piss on every opponent they face on their way to another Championship then to see TO and Dallas get a ring.

agreed.  i hate the patriots based on thier running up the score and thier head coach (i got nothing against brady or moss really and i loved stallworth here).

but i hate dallas forever and would never ever want to see them get another ring. maybe the pats need a loss to proper them into even more of a hypermode. maybe the eagles somehow provide them that loss. and maybe ill win the lottery as well.

i just feel really bad for mcnabb. you just know reid is going to drop him back 60% of the time to pass and one of the patriots is going to kill him.
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: Feva on November 21, 2007, 08:23:25 AM
Quote from: FastFreddie on November 20, 2007, 08:13:18 PM
I'm all for Brady and/or Moss going down, but I actually like the way they're running up the score.  It's the way I wish my teams would play.  No farging mercy.

Exactly.  I love to watch them.  That's football.  If you get the opportunity, you kick the shtein out of the other guy, and you keep kicking the shtein out of them until the clock hits zero.  I admire them for having the nuts to do it and then have a "who gives a shtein" attitude in their postgame PC every week.

Quote from: SD_Eagle on November 20, 2007, 09:21:00 PM
I'd be all for injuring Brady if Dallas wasn't having such a good year. They're a legit SB contender and I'd rather see the Pats spit and piss on every opponent they face on their way to another Championship then to see TO and Dallas get a ring.

Yep... agreed again.  As long as Brady and Moss are standing, I know there's no way in hell that Dallas is going to get a ring this year.  That's how I've gotten comfortable with the fact that they're probably going to rep the NFC in the SB.  If they get there... they'll get crushed by one of, if not the, best teams the NFL has ever seen.
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: Cerevant on November 21, 2007, 09:50:45 AM
Quote from: EagleFeva on November 21, 2007, 08:23:25 AM
Quote from: FastFreddie on November 20, 2007, 08:13:18 PM
I'm all for Brady and/or Moss going down, but I actually like the way they're running up the score.  It's the way I wish my teams would play.  No farging mercy.

Exactly.  I love to watch them.  That's football.  If you get the opportunity, you kick the shtein out of the other guy, and you keep kicking the shtein out of them until the clock hits zero.  I admire them for having the nuts to do it and then have a "who gives a shtein" attitude in their postgame PC every week.

Amen.  The rest of you who are whining about "running up the score" are just a bunch of Hoydas.  If the team doesn't want the score run up, they should man up and play some D.  If they can't, they should lay down and STFU.
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: ice grillin you on November 21, 2007, 09:53:44 AM
im personally on the side of destruction but theres an argument to be made for decorum and sportsmanship...dont act like there isnt or its a crazy idea
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: Magical_Retard on November 21, 2007, 10:10:29 AM
Quote from: Cerevant on November 21, 2007, 09:50:45 AM
Quote from: EagleFeva on November 21, 2007, 08:23:25 AM
Quote from: FastFreddie on November 20, 2007, 08:13:18 PM
I'm all for Brady and/or Moss going down, but I actually like the way they're running up the score.  It's the way I wish my teams would play.  No farging mercy.

Exactly.  I love to watch them.  That's football.  If you get the opportunity, you kick the shtein out of the other guy, and you keep kicking the shtein out of them until the clock hits zero.  I admire them for having the nuts to do it and then have a "who gives a shtein" attitude in their postgame PC every week.



Amen.  The rest of you who are whining about "running up the score" are just a bunch of Hoydas.  If the team doesn't want the score run up, they should man up and play some D.  If they can't, they should lay down and STFU.

yet the same ppl will complain about atheletes dancing or celebrating. or saying something outrageous.

its all about sportmanship and you can not pick and chose which you like and which you think is being soft.

the concept of running up the score exists in pretty much all sports and there is a precedent set by all coaches usually about not doing it. its seen as a insult. it has nothing to do with what the other team can or can not do. if they could have stopped the pats from doing it they would have done it in the first qrt or first half. its more evident because the pats do go for it and usually get it and score. even if buff or washington before them had stopped the pats on those 4rth downs...its still trying to run up the score and showing up the other team and coaches. not stopping them or stopping has nothing to do with it. its the very concept that they attempted to go for it.

to go for it on 4rth downs and pass to keep padding the score is unsportsman like.

funny that when players do something established as being bush league or showing up a another player (taunting) its the player being selfish and putting himself above the game or a whole list of other claims and accusations. when a coach is constantly running up the score its OMG I LOVE IT.

werent ppl here complaining about reid keeping mcnabb in the det game too long? or that they kept passing in the 4rth qrt when the game was already over?
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: Rome on November 21, 2007, 10:17:26 AM
There should be a mercy rule in professional sports.

that is incredibly accurate.
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: ice grillin you on November 21, 2007, 10:20:44 AM
funny that when players do something established as being bush league or showing up a another player (taunting) its the player being selfish and putting himself above the game or a whole list of other claims and accusations. when a coach is constantly running up the score its OMG I LOVE IT.

when an old white genius coach does it its ok

when a young rich black guy does it not so much

just sayin
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: Feva on November 21, 2007, 10:21:26 AM
Quote from: Magical_Retard on November 21, 2007, 10:10:29 AM
Quote from: Cerevant on November 21, 2007, 09:50:45 AM
Quote from: EagleFeva on November 21, 2007, 08:23:25 AM
Quote from: FastFreddie on November 20, 2007, 08:13:18 PM
I'm all for Brady and/or Moss going down, but I actually like the way they're running up the score.  It's the way I wish my teams would play.  No farging mercy.

Exactly.  I love to watch them.  That's football.  If you get the opportunity, you kick the shtein out of the other guy, and you keep kicking the shtein out of them until the clock hits zero.  I admire them for having the nuts to do it and then have a "who gives a shtein" attitude in their postgame PC every week.



Amen.  The rest of you who are whining about "running up the score" are just a bunch of Hoydas.  If the team doesn't want the score run up, they should man up and play some D.  If they can't, they should lay down and STFU.

yet the same ppl will complain about atheletes dancing or celebrating. or saying something outrageous.

its all about sportmanship and you can not pick and chose which you like and which you think is being soft.

the concept of running up the score exists in pretty much all sports and there is a precedent set by all coaches usually about not doing it. its seen as a insult. it has nothing to do with what the other team can or can not do. if they could have stopped the pats from doing it they would have done it in the first qrt or first half. its more evident because the pats do go for it and usually get it and score. even if buff or washington before them had stopped the pats on those 4rth downs...its still trying to run up the score and showing up the other team and coaches. not stopping them or stopping has nothing to do with it. its the very concept that they attempted to go for it.

to go for it on 4rth downs and pass to keep padding the score is unsportsman like.

funny that when players do something established as being bush league or showing up a another player (taunting) its the player being selfish and putting himself above the game or a whole list of other claims and accusations. when a coach is constantly running up the score its OMG I LOVE IT.

werent ppl here complaining about reid keeping mcnabb in the det game too long? or that they kept passing in the 4rth qrt when the game was already over?

Personally, I don't give a shtein about the dancing, celebrating, etc... or at least I'm not against it, anyway.

Not trying to speak for everybody, but if there were people wanting McNabb out in the DET game or late game passing, I'd think it had more to do with not wanting him to get injured... not because they weren't thoroughly enjoying kicking the shtein out the Lions.

Since there's no attachment to be worried about any of the Pats getting injured... run up the farging score.  It's their problem if someone gets hurt.
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: rjs246 on November 21, 2007, 10:38:09 AM
I don't like showboating of any sort. I don't like it when athletes do it and I don't like it when coaches try to shove it up the ass of every person that said they were a cheater, even though they were in fact cheating.  I don't want the Eagles players to showboat, I want them to break Tom Brady's arm and ribs and chin.
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: Rome on November 21, 2007, 10:41:53 AM
Hahaha.

Intent to injure > showboating.


I love you guys. 
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: Magical_Retard on November 21, 2007, 12:21:12 PM
Quote from: EagleFeva on November 21, 2007, 10:21:26 AM
Quote from: Magical_Retard on November 21, 2007, 10:10:29 AM
Quote from: Cerevant on November 21, 2007, 09:50:45 AM
Quote from: EagleFeva on November 21, 2007, 08:23:25 AM
Quote from: FastFreddie on November 20, 2007, 08:13:18 PM
I'm all for Brady and/or Moss going down, but I actually like the way they're running up the score.  It's the way I wish my teams would play.  No farging mercy.

Exactly.  I love to watch them.  That's football.  If you get the opportunity, you kick the shtein out of the other guy, and you keep kicking the shtein out of them until the clock hits zero.  I admire them for having the nuts to do it and then have a "who gives a shtein" attitude in their postgame PC every week.



Amen.  The rest of you who are whining about "running up the score" are just a bunch of Hoydas.  If the team doesn't want the score run up, they should man up and play some D.  If they can't, they should lay down and STFU.

yet the same ppl will complain about atheletes dancing or celebrating. or saying something outrageous.

its all about sportmanship and you can not pick and chose which you like and which you think is being soft.

the concept of running up the score exists in pretty much all sports and there is a precedent set by all coaches usually about not doing it. its seen as a insult. it has nothing to do with what the other team can or can not do. if they could have stopped the pats from doing it they would have done it in the first qrt or first half. its more evident because the pats do go for it and usually get it and score. even if buff or washington before them had stopped the pats on those 4rth downs...its still trying to run up the score and showing up the other team and coaches. not stopping them or stopping has nothing to do with it. its the very concept that they attempted to go for it.

to go for it on 4rth downs and pass to keep padding the score is unsportsman like.

funny that when players do something established as being bush league or showing up a another player (taunting) its the player being selfish and putting himself above the game or a whole list of other claims and accusations. when a coach is constantly running up the score its OMG I LOVE IT.

werent ppl here complaining about reid keeping mcnabb in the det game too long? or that they kept passing in the 4rth qrt when the game was already over?

Personally, I don't give a shtein about the dancing, celebrating, etc... or at least I'm not against it, anyway.

Not trying to speak for everybody, but if there were people wanting McNabb out in the DET game or late game passing, I'd think it had more to do with not wanting him to get injured... not because they weren't thoroughly enjoying kicking the shtein out the Lions.

Since there's no attachment to be worried about any of the Pats getting injured... run up the farging score.  It's their problem if someone gets hurt.

yours is a individuals and a fans view. most of the league officials, coaches, and former players/coaches/analysts all get up in arms when a player (like say TO or Ocho Cinco) does a dance or celebration. the players can cost the team a penalty, get fined, or even suspended. so they have established that rule wether you like it or not.

why is it different for coaches? you can not have it both ways and thats why its pretty shady that the media for the most part lets the patriots get away with it but if a player was showing up a opponent the character of that player would be crucified.

couldnt they turn around and say "hey if you dont like TO dancing on your star" then try to stop him from scoring TDs?
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: Feva on November 21, 2007, 12:57:40 PM
Quote from: Magical_Retard on November 21, 2007, 12:21:12 PM
yours is a individuals and a fans view. most of the league officials, coaches, and former players/coaches/analysts all get up in arms when a player (like say TO or Ocho Cinco) does a dance or celebration. the players can cost the team a penalty, get fined, or even suspended. so they have established that rule wether you like it or not.

why is it different for coaches? you can not have it both ways and thats why its pretty shady that the media for the most part lets the patriots get away with it but if a player was showing up a opponent the character of that player would be crucified.

couldnt they turn around and say "hey if you dont like TO dancing on your star" then try to stop him from scoring TDs?

Oh, now see... this part I agree with.  I definitely believe there's a double standard league/media-wise and how they portray a Belicek vs. a TO or Ocho Cinco... and I think that's bullshtein too.  What I was getting at is that fans for the large part, shouldn't give a shtein or care that a team like the Pats are running it up.  It's not unsportsmanlike... it's within the rules.  If the NFL was so worried about teams getting blown out so bad, they would invoke a mercy rule.

Every offensive play is designed to score a touchdown.  Every time the offense gets the ball, its job is to score touchdowns.
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: phattymatty on November 21, 2007, 01:03:16 PM
it blows my mind that people are pissed that they went for it on 4th down against the cowboys.    a FG is more of a slap in the face than going for it.  at least he gave them one more chance to stop them.   everyone sounds like a bunch of women. 
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: rjs246 on November 21, 2007, 01:28:14 PM
Quote from: Jerome99RIP on November 21, 2007, 10:41:53 AM
Hahaha.

Intent to injure > showboating.

farg yes. One is manly and inspired by angry feelings of rage. The other is fruity and inspired by a douchey desire to be on TV. In other words, TV sucks and should be killed.
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: rjs246 on November 21, 2007, 01:32:04 PM
Quote from: phattymatty on November 21, 2007, 01:03:16 PM
it blows my mind that people are pissed that they went for it on 4th down against the cowboys.    a FG is more of a slap in the face than going for it.  at least he gave them one more chance to stop them.   everyone sounds like a bunch of women. 

I don't care about 4th downs in particular. There's this misconception that going for it on 4th down takes some sort of massive cajones and that only a wild man would go for it. That just isn't the case. More teams should go for it on 4th down as far as I'm concerned.

My problem with Belichick et al is that I think it shows no class to have all of your starters in in the 4th quarter of a 25+ point blowout. To have them in throwing the ball on every down is even more farged up and should result in broken noses.
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: Wingspan on November 21, 2007, 01:42:15 PM
Tom Brady would not be happy with you.
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: SunMo on November 21, 2007, 01:56:24 PM
Tom Brady molests retarded children, fact.
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: Wingspan on November 21, 2007, 02:01:16 PM
Only while he is simultaneously farging a super model.
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: SunMo on November 21, 2007, 02:05:43 PM
QuotePHILADELPHIA -- Donovan McNabb will not practice Wednesday because of ankle and thumb injuries, and it's uncertain whether the five-time Pro Bowl quarterback will play for the Eagles against New England on Sunday.

Donovan McNabb

McNabb

"You want to be smart, but you want to get out there and play," McNabb said.

McNabb hurt his thumb early in Philadelphia's 17-7 win over Miami, and left the game after he sprained his right ankle in the second quarter. A.J. Feeley led the Eagles to a pair of touchdowns and would start against the Patriots if McNabb can't play.

Coach Andy Reid said McNabb's ankle swelled up Tuesday. A day earlier, it seemed the thumb injury was more of a concern.

"Right now the ankle is a little more swollen than the thumb," Reid said. "We'll take it day by day and see how he goes."
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: Rome on November 21, 2007, 02:43:19 PM
(http://www.casadinhos.com.br/blog/uploaded_images/tom-braddy-gisele-bundchen-730937.jpg)


Die.
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: JackStraw on November 21, 2007, 03:07:35 PM
Why does this game actually have me pretty excited over all the dreck I've watched this season so far? Well some great things will result:

A national prime-time exposure of the "Gold Standard" WMD bullshtein. Since that 4th qtr in the SB, the two teams couldn't have gone in more opposite directions. Look for that to be painfully reinforced by announcers a few times Sunday night. LuireReidCo can continue to deny it, but there will be no no plainer proof than this game of anal rippage.

Additional national proof showing that after Stallworth slaps them around that they can't draft nor can they retain anyone remotely good at that position.

If he plays, this game defines McNabbs longer term prospects. And if he doesn't play b/c of injury, that in of itself will be telling to any future suitors. Either way this game reduces his marketability. Too bad for the Eagles, but take solace that they would squander any picks/take marginal players in return anyway.

Answer to the question of not can they win, but can serious pain be inflicted, or will they go down like sniveling pantywaists? If this team has any Philly in them, they will hurt some-farging somebody - especially in garbage time.

I am looking forward to this game to see if this team has any vestiges of ability to compete. A cheek-spreading, buns-up, pillow-biting, meat-missle team colonoscopy on SNF can only be great fodder for the off-season reducing any remaining Reid apologists and LurieLappers to utterly laughable status.

Lastly, this whupping will finally put us back to where we were in the late 90's - all bandwagoners will have jumped, and we can look forward to this part of the Eagles regular 12 year cycle which is 5-7 years of miserable coaches and results.

But at least we'll have each other.
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: hbionic on November 21, 2007, 03:25:56 PM
Quote from: JackStraw on November 21, 2007, 03:07:35 PM
Why does this game actually have me pretty excited over all the dreck I've watched this season so far? Well some great things will result:

A national prime-time exposure of the "Gold Standard" WMD bullshtein. Since that 4th qtr in the SB, the two teams couldn't have gone in more opposite directions. Look for that to be painfully reinforced by announcers a few times Sunday night. LuireReidCo can continue to deny it, but there will be no no plainer proof than this game of anal rippage.

Additional national proof showing that after Stallworth slaps them around that they can't draft nor can they retain anyone remotely good at that position.

If he plays, this game defines McNabbs longer term prospects. And if he doesn't play b/c of injury, that in of itself will be telling to any future suitors. Either way this game reduces his marketability. Too bad for the Eagles, but take solace that they would squander any picks/take marginal players in return anyway.

Answer to the question of not can they win, but can serious pain be inflicted, or will they go down like sniveling pantywaists? If this team has any Philly in them, they will hurt some-farging somebody - especially in garbage time.

I am looking forward to this game to see if this team has any vestiges of ability to compete. A cheek-spreading, buns-up, pillow-biting, meat-missle team colonoscopy on SNF can only be great fodder for the off-season reducing any remaining Reid apologists and LurieLappers to utterly laughable status.

Lastly, this whupping will finally put us back to where we were in the late 90's - all bandwagoners will have jumped, and we can look forward to this part of the Eagles regular 12 year cycle which is 5-7 years of miserable coaches and results.

But at least we'll have each other.

Bravo.

Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: Magical_Retard on November 21, 2007, 03:45:26 PM
Quote from: Jerome99RIP on November 21, 2007, 02:43:19 PM
(http://www.casadinhos.com.br/blog/uploaded_images/tom-braddy-gisele-bundchen-730937.jpg)


Die.


am i the only one who thinks bridgette is prettier than gisele?
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: rjs246 on November 21, 2007, 03:58:43 PM
Prettier than Gisele. True or not, the very concept only makes me angrier.
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: phattymatty on November 21, 2007, 04:15:32 PM
http://www.bostonmagazine.com/blogs/boston/2007/11/20/greetings-new-englanders/ (http://www.bostonmagazine.com/blogs/boston/2007/11/20/greetings-new-englanders/)
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: rjs246 on November 21, 2007, 04:38:30 PM
Something tells me that that article is going to make me angry.

Boston fans are awesome. Yeahdoood!
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: MadMarchHare on November 22, 2007, 07:47:39 AM
I want to see this turn into the football version of Slapshot.  I want to see cheap shots and fist fights to the point where the police need to get involved, becuase the refs can't control it.

I want people carried unmoving off the field in stretchers.  They'll be talking about this game for years.

If that happened.  farging Reid, can't even get a brawl right.
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: SunMo on November 22, 2007, 09:14:09 AM
you don't need a football version of slapshot...you just need them to be the Mean Machine from The Longest Yard

I think I broke his farging neck!
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: MadMarchHare on November 22, 2007, 09:43:17 AM
Maybe they can give Mike Vrabel the "free play" treatment.  I'd love to see vrabel doubled over grabbing his balls only to have Runyan, Andrews and Jean-Gilles pile on.
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: Cerevant on November 22, 2007, 09:51:39 AM
Hey, look on the bright side: On Yahoo, 4% of the people think the Eagles can beat the Pats in spite of a 22pt spread, while only 3% think Miami can beat Pittsburgh with a 16pt spread.
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: Feva on November 22, 2007, 10:39:55 AM
I'm at work today and this morning our Sports Anchor joked about "being thankful" for not having to face Peyton Manning tonight like the Falcons do.

I told him I'd much rather be in that position than to have to face Tom Brady like the Eagles do on sunday night.  He winced, nodded... and walked away.
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: TexasEagle on November 22, 2007, 12:53:06 PM
Quote from: JackStraw on November 21, 2007, 03:07:35 PM
Why does this game actually have me pretty excited over all the dreck I've watched this season so far? Well some great things will result:

A national prime-time exposure of the "Gold Standard" WMD bullshtein. Since that 4th qtr in the SB, the two teams couldn't have gone in more opposite directions. Look for that to be painfully reinforced by announcers a few times Sunday night. LuireReidCo can continue to deny it, but there will be no no plainer proof than this game of anal rippage.

Additional national proof showing that after Stallworth slaps them around that they can't draft nor can they retain anyone remotely good at that position.

If he plays, this game defines McNabbs longer term prospects. And if he doesn't play b/c of injury, that in of itself will be telling to any future suitors. Either way this game reduces his marketability. Too bad for the Eagles, but take solace that they would squander any picks/take marginal players in return anyway.

Answer to the question of not can they win, but can serious pain be inflicted, or will they go down like sniveling pantywaists? If this team has any Philly in them, they will hurt some-farging somebody - especially in garbage time.

I am looking forward to this game to see if this team has any vestiges of ability to compete. A cheek-spreading, buns-up, pillow-biting, meat-missle team colonoscopy on SNF can only be great fodder for the off-season reducing any remaining Reid apologists and LurieLappers to utterly laughable status.

Lastly, this whupping will finally put us back to where we were in the late 90's - all bandwagoners will have jumped, and we can look forward to this part of the Eagles regular 12 year cycle which is 5-7 years of miserable coaches and results.

But at least we'll have each other.

QFT




And now I'm depressed... thanks!
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: QB Eagles on November 22, 2007, 01:54:39 PM
Quote from: Cerevant on November 22, 2007, 09:51:39 AM
Hey, look on the bright side: On Yahoo, 4% of the people think the Eagles can beat the Pats in spite of a 22pt spread, while only 3% think Miami can beat Pittsburgh with a 16pt spread.

WTF? The Dolphins aren't as bad as their record, and Pittsburgh has been beating mediocre teams and losing to terrible teams all year.
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: QB Eagles on November 24, 2007, 12:13:08 PM
Eagles to use Kearse more against Patriots. (http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3124620) I'm sure the Pats are quaking in their boots.
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: rjs246 on November 24, 2007, 03:38:34 PM
JOKERZ!
Title: Re: Pats Talk
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on November 24, 2007, 06:14:59 PM
We like to throw Freddy Garcia fastballs at the opposing offense.