ConcreteBoard

Eagles => Eagles Talk => Topic started by: The BIGSTUD on January 14, 2007, 03:00:22 AM

Title: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on January 14, 2007, 03:00:22 AM
It's that time of the year where everyone starts studying those mock drafts and free agency to be lists.

What personnel changes do we need? What coaching changes do we need? Who should and will be re-signed? Etc...

I think we need to re-sign Stallworth, Juqua Thomas, and Garcia. Is William Tra Thomas a free agent or no? I can't remember if he was or had one year left. Whatever the case, he needs to be back. He had a quietly very solid season.

Upgrade the defensive line, add a strong safety, add a SAM LB, a back to share the load with Westbrook, and a new nickel corner assuming Hood leaves.

The Eagles have a lot of work to do.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Quasimoto on January 14, 2007, 12:23:09 PM
Quote from: King Cole on January 14, 2007, 03:00:22 AM
The Eagles have a lot of work to do.

They always do
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on January 14, 2007, 12:27:26 PM
First order of business. Fire Andy Reid.
Second order of business. Send Scott Young back to Utah.
Third order of business. Get a running back that you aren't afraid of 'over-using'.
Fourth order of business. Stop drafting projects and draft some farging players.

Guess what. They're going to go 0 for 4 this offseason.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on January 14, 2007, 12:40:36 PM
Re-sign Jeff Garcia
Re-sign Juqua Thomas
Re-sign Quintin Mikell
Re-sign Donte Stallworth (THEY MUST BRING HIM BACK)
Re-sign Correll Buckhalter
Re-sign Shawn Barber
Re-sign Will James

Roderick Hood will leave via UFA
Mike Lewis will leave via UFA
Dhani Jones should be released
Jerome McDougle will likely be released
Scott Young get the hell outta town
Reno Mahe gets his NFL pension now because of time served. Hello Jeremy Bloom, goodbye Reno Mahe.
Darwin Walker in an engineer. Perhaps he can design himself a way out of town?


Pay Garcia enough to ward off the other teams who come sniffing along. He doesn't want to go to a bum team like Tampa or someone like that. Not another Cleveland or Detroit situation for him.

People ripped the re-signing of Juqua Thomas last season but he showed that he can bring it from the edge. He'll likely get some offers in FA (I bet that Washington goes after him)

Quintin Mikell is the new Ike Reese. And despite his great STs play he should be brought back because he is a good safety too.

Donte Stallworth is priority number 1 right now. Get him signed. I am afraid that they will want to do with Avant and Baskett though. Heckert is on record saying he is impressed with those guys and they could take over. Let's hope Donte is true to his word that he digs it here and wants to stay and the feelings are mutual. Heckert said they bring him back if the money is right.

Buck played well this year. But in addition to binging him back they must get another RB in here.

Shawn Barber is a big part of the nickel defense. He's older and is best suited for that role.

With Hood undoubtedly leaving James needs to return. Him being hurt could help him come back here.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 14, 2007, 12:46:23 PM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on January 14, 2007, 12:40:36 PM

Re-sign Juqua Thomas

He was our best DE down the stretch and in the playoffs, he should be re-signed immediately. They better not let him go and Burgess it elsewhere.
Re-sign Stallworth is an obvious. After that the offense is almost set.

They need to upgrade the D. Stop with the small quick McCoy types and get some physical farging LBs who can lay the wood. Get a run stuffing DT in here, there's no reason Walker and Patterson should be in there for 90% of the defensive snaps. That's totally unacceptable. Bring a 330 lbs. DT for 1st and 2nd downs - it's not like you'd be giving up much of a pass rush.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on January 14, 2007, 12:48:26 PM
They had one of those in Keyonta. They have no interest in that kind of player. Dumbasses.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 14, 2007, 12:50:37 PM
Quote from: rjs246 on January 14, 2007, 12:48:26 PM
They had one of those in Keyonta. They have no interest in that kind of player. Dumbasses.

Keyonta wasn't that good. A guy like Hollis Thomas would have looked good on the D-line lastnight.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on January 14, 2007, 12:52:05 PM
I think there was more to Keyonta being let go than them not liking fat body DTs. They do need one in there though. I should add that Darwin Walker needs to be on the next plane out of here. I'll add him to my list.

When it comes to the UFA signing frenzy LB needs to be right atop that list. Will it happen? Probably not. But let's hope that Lance Briggs (if he can play SLB) or Adalius Thomas (if he can play 4-3 SLB) are targets.

Scrap the Gocong to SLB project now and let him play DE.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Eaglez on January 14, 2007, 12:59:18 PM
I think Adalius Thomas would be a great pickup in FA despite his age (I think he's 31). He played well last night against the Colts and can stay step for step with a lot of TEs. I like his ability to rush the passer and his big frame is great against the run.

He might be asking for a hefty price tag, however.

Stallworth needs to be resigned. He's a great deep threat and he comes up in the clutch. Darwin needs to find the door.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 14, 2007, 01:05:12 PM
stallworth is gone

he would have already been signed were he staying...he wants to see the open market and rightfully so

eagles dont compete for free agents...they either resign them before they come up or they jump all over them out the gate...once other teams become involved they dont get it done...and stallworth mos def wants other teams involved
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on January 14, 2007, 01:09:00 PM
No doubt Rosenhaus wants to test the market. But I wonder if it has anything to do with not wanting to give up the 3rd round pick? I'm not sure if that condition applies once they hit the FA period or not.

Kansas City is a team who needs a WR in a BAD, BAD, BAD way.

Don't be stupid, Eagles. Get Donte signed. :deion
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MDS on January 14, 2007, 01:11:20 PM
Stallworth
A RB to compliment Westbrook
A new Strong Safety
A SAM LB
Decent backup OL not named Scott Young
Nickelback
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 14, 2007, 01:13:14 PM
But I wonder if it has anything to do with not wanting to give up the 3rd round pick?

god i hope youre wrong

but if you arent then the front office should be arrested
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: jeffreyjpa on January 14, 2007, 01:13:36 PM
Sadly, I agree with IGY...Stallworth is probably gone. The Eagles rely on their UFA's to love Philadelphia/the team/the fans enough to take less money, and will not get into a bidding war to keep them. At his age and talent level, Donte' would be a fool to take less money to stay here, despite liking the rest of the Eagles' situation.

Rosenhaus will contact the Eagles to express his interest (and probably already has), the Eagles will tell him to go talk to other teams to get an idea of his worth, and he'll never return.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on January 14, 2007, 01:16:12 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 14, 2007, 01:13:14 PM
But I wonder if it has anything to do with not wanting to give up the 3rd round pick?

god i hope youre wrong

but if you arent then the front office should be arrested

I hope I'm wrong too. But I'm not sure how far the conditions extend to. End of season? Only until UFA starts? I'm sure we'll find out soon though.

Bottom line is that Stallworth is 100x better than ANY 3rd round pick they could have. We can only hope that the Eagles see that.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 14, 2007, 01:18:42 PM
Bottom line is that Stallworth is 100x better than ANY 3rd round pick they could have

amen

plus its not like they have to give up a pick or no pick....its the difference btwn a 3rd and a 4th...which is nothing
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on January 14, 2007, 02:18:24 PM
It's pretty inconceivable that the Eagles & Stallworth already have a gentlemen's agreement regarding his contract, and as much as it pains me to say it, I think he's gone.

No way Rosenhaus lets him sign for a "hometown" discount.  Then again, you never know.  I would have never let him get to this point.  Every other player the Eagles signed to an extension would have been standing behind Donte in line if I were the GM.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on January 14, 2007, 02:30:33 PM
Supposedly it automatically becomes a 4th if he gets to free agency, re-signed or not.  I dont know why they would risk it though...
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 14, 2007, 02:33:55 PM
Supposedly it automatically becomes a 4th if he gets to free agency, re-signed or not

what do you mean...i thought its a 4th right now no matter what happens....and if they resign him its a 3rd

is there more to it than that?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on January 14, 2007, 03:39:38 PM
GET LANCE BRIGGS
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 14, 2007, 03:42:32 PM
GET DONTE STALLWORTH
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Munson on January 14, 2007, 03:48:33 PM
Donte Stallworth obviously.

Defensivle help in all phases, DT, SAM, SS.....and probably someone to eventually take over for Trotter. I like Gaither at WLB.

A coach who will be willing to run the ball at least 30 times a game...and I mean with the running backs, not 22 with the running backs and then McNabb/Garcia scrambles counting for anohter 8. So, re-sign Buck, and get another guy who can take 8-10 carries agame, and FIND A COACH WILLING TO USE THEM. So Reid needs to change his philosophy, which won't happen, or be gone, which won't happen.

Nice.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on January 14, 2007, 04:12:29 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 14, 2007, 01:13:14 PM
But I wonder if it has anything to do with not wanting to give up the 3rd round pick?

god i hope youre wrong

but if you arent then the front office should be arrested

If they end up letting Stallworth walk over a farging draft pick... somebody's getting shot.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyGirl on January 14, 2007, 04:13:55 PM
FWIW, my "source" seems to think Stallworth will get signed.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on January 14, 2007, 04:27:15 PM
Your 'source' says that because no one can fathom why they wouldn't sign him. This front office is completely capable of letting him walk over a few bucks.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: General_Failure on January 14, 2007, 04:32:48 PM
Lurie: Good news, Andy. You get to keep your job.
Reid: Oh praise Young! Thank you Jeff.
Lurie: Don't mention it. Oh, by the way. McNabb isn't going to be ready until halfway through the regular season.
Reid: I was afraid of that. Well, we still have Jeff Gar-
Lurie: No, he signed with Tampa yesterday.
Reid: Well, that's a big loss. I'm sure AJ can-
Lurie: Nope. Traded him to KC for a 6th rounder.
Reid: That's odd. Still, I'm sure we can get someone to throw the ball up to Stallw-
Lurie: HAHAHHAHAHAHAH! Check the news, Andy. He signed with the taterskins this morning. We lose a 4th round pick for him, but I think you'll do great things with that extra 6th we got you.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on January 14, 2007, 04:35:05 PM
You forgot the part where they jerk each other off to completion during the conversation.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: General_Failure on January 14, 2007, 04:36:58 PM
Yeah, I pretty much stuck to the conversation part of their sexings.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on January 14, 2007, 04:37:30 PM
Joe Banner said this week that Lurie is completely committed to winning. Let's see if he lives up to that claim.

and that means some big signings this offseason. No more excuses that the Matt McCoys and the Chris Gocongs are going to walk in and be pro bowlers. I've heard enough of it.

Last offseason we were all mad that they sat on their asses, but the great draft(or what we thought was great at the time) tempered that anger. Well I don't think anyone here is going to buy their shtein anymore. No more excuses. The window is closing and this defense needs to be fixed.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 14, 2007, 04:38:23 PM
Reid: (takes penis out of his mouth) Oh praise Young! Thank you Jeff
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on January 14, 2007, 05:12:04 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 14, 2007, 02:33:55 PM
Supposedly it automatically becomes a 4th if he gets to free agency, re-signed or not

what do you mean...i thought its a 4th right now no matter what happens....and if they resign him its a 3rd

is there more to it than that?

That's what I've always heard too, but Spadaro thinks otherwise.  I think he needs to check with his boy Heckert....
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on January 14, 2007, 05:13:34 PM
Quote from: Seabiscuit36 on January 14, 2007, 03:39:38 PM
GET LANCE BRIGGS


Franchise tag
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Magical_Retard on January 14, 2007, 05:20:01 PM
what about june? i don't care if we have to overpay for some LBs that might not be even amazing but we need an upgrade....someone. im sick of having a bad offense when our D was good and now having a mediocre D when our offense is pretty good.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on January 14, 2007, 05:23:14 PM
Adalius Thomas?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on January 14, 2007, 05:29:39 PM
Quote from: Magical_Retard on January 14, 2007, 05:20:01 PM
what about june? i don't care if we have to overpay for some LBs that might not be even amazing but we need an upgrade....someone. im sick of having a bad offense when our D was good and now having a mediocre D when our offense is pretty good.

Cato June is too small.  He's a converted safety and he'd do nothing in this defense other than get blown up in run support like he does in Indy and like Matt McCoy and Dhani Jones do/did here.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: General_Failure on January 14, 2007, 06:04:39 PM
Can he play safety?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on January 14, 2007, 06:23:02 PM
Thomas is a stud. I would love him, but the Eagles will probably feed us the Gocong is the next Merriman propaganda.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Don Ho on January 14, 2007, 08:11:40 PM
Quote from: King Cole on January 14, 2007, 06:23:02 PM
Thomas is a stud. I would love him, but the Eagles will probably feed us the Gocong is the next Merriman propaganda.

Cole I have to admit that was a good one :-D
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on January 14, 2007, 10:01:11 PM
-- Smith says he wants to sign a long-term deal here.

Quote"It'd make a nice off-season to know this is where I'm going to be, but I understand how the Eagles operate. You're not always trying to get the most, but you're trying to get a fair deal. I think that's what most football players want, in a league where you aren't guaranteed anything. You just want a fair deal. Maybe I'm not happy with it, maybe they're not happy with it, but let's just meet in the middle somewhere. That's all I'm really asking for."

-- Hood likes it here but thinks he can be a starter (and get starter money) somewhere else.

Quote"I see myself as a starter. This organization sees me as a starter. Fortunately, we have two corners in Lito and Sheldon. If other teams see me as a starter, I'll have to weigh my options. I would like to be here. I started my career here. I think this is a great team, great organization. I'm going to pray about it and let God handle it."
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Munson on January 15, 2007, 04:23:10 AM
Quote from: BigEd76 on January 14, 2007, 10:01:11 PM
-- Hood likes it here but thinks he can be a starter (and get starter money) somewhere else.

Quote"I see myself as a starter. This organization sees me as a starter. Fortunately, we have two corners in Lito and Sheldon. If other teams see me as a starter, I'll have to weigh my options. I would like to be here. I started my career here. I think this is a great team, great organization. I'm going to pray about it and let God handle it."

So he'll go play HOF ball in Green Bay and die in 10-12 years?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on January 15, 2007, 07:13:44 AM
"I'm going to pray about it and let God handle it."

simp
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Eaglez on January 15, 2007, 09:01:01 AM
I'm somewhat surprised Hood says he wants to stay considering he was shafted earlier this year in favor fo Joselio Hanson.

I'm glad Smith is optimistic, too. And that he doesn't seem to want to drag out contract negotiations.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on January 15, 2007, 09:27:23 AM
Ok, I'm going to throw this out there for shteins and giggles just to see what everyone thinks. 

Do the Eagles use a roster spot on Detmer next year just to be the holder?  It's obvious that Dirk wasn't a great holder to begin with and Akers never seemed to comfortable with him.  Akers + Detmer = 4/4 FG. 

If that's what it takes to keep Akers between the uprights, is it worth using a roster spot on Detmer?  Do the Eagles carry 4 QB's on the roster next year?  Which leads me to.........

If the Eagles decide to keep neckbeard around simply to be the holder, which QB is likely the odd man out if they only go with 3 qb's?  Garcia or Feeley?  Would the Eagles be willing to let Garcia walk and go with Feeley to start the season if need be?  Or will they cut ties with Feeley, knowing that the young QB will certainly be picked up by another team.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: hunt on January 15, 2007, 09:37:58 AM
if detmer is on next year's roster, i'll kill sombody.....dead.


garcia will leave, feeley will open the season as the starter until #5 is healthy & they'll either draft a qb in the middle rounds or sign some craptastic free agent to be the #3.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on January 15, 2007, 09:48:49 AM
Quote from: hunt on January 15, 2007, 09:37:58 AM
if detmer is on next year's roster, i'll kill sombody.....dead.

So, is that a "no" then? 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: General_Failure on January 15, 2007, 10:05:19 AM
I'd like to see him back. It's not like they're going to use that one last gameday spot on someone that will contribute. AJ can do a fair job when he has to play, so I wouldn't mind if he were the backup after stumbling the team through the first N games until McNabb is ready.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Eaglez on January 15, 2007, 10:16:45 AM
Is there any regulation prohibiting the Eagles from carrying 4 QBs?

Maybe the Eagles can open up a roster spot designated 'holder'

I dunno. I think Akers just needs to get over it and kick the damn ball. His man crush on Detmer has to stop and he needs to be able to kick in the clutch regardless of who the holder is.

Otherwise, nothing much separates him from all the other mediocre kickers in the league. His kickoffs aren't as long anymore, his accuracy has seem a marked decline this year and even last (but I guess that was somewhat exacerbated by the injury), and he just doesn't look as confident going into his kicks.

If there is a roster spot open, hell, keep neckbeard around. However, I have a hard time coming to terms with the front office willing to spend close to $1 million on a holder and not address the Stallworth situation or the OLB spots or SS for next season.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: DH on January 15, 2007, 11:18:39 AM
We have a front 7 that cant stop the run for shtein, a SS who can't tackle a dead goldfish, a top WR who is a FA a MLB who is 2 years past his prime and were worrying about a holder???

Come the farg on.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Mad-Lad on January 15, 2007, 11:34:28 AM
they should draft a DT who had a terriffic combine and looks like the Thing!  Oh wait, they did that already and he couldnt' crack the starting lineup.

At least Dhani's still on the roster.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 15, 2007, 11:37:01 AM
Oh wait, they did that already and he couldnt' crack the starting lineup

he couldnt crack the field
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Mad-Lad on January 15, 2007, 11:39:56 AM
he's SUCH a physical specimen though! I think he did like an infinity bench presses at the combine.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 15, 2007, 11:45:12 AM
man the eagles should thank god andrews turned out to be a player...and they deservingly get credit for him...but outside of the big kid and the sprinkling in of reggie brown lj smith and another guy or two their last four drafts have been a travesty
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Quasimoto on January 15, 2007, 11:49:21 AM
Whats the word on the Big Kid?  Is he going to be alright?  Read it was just a neck contusion but swelling in the neck sounds farged up as anything.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on January 15, 2007, 11:50:40 AM
I thought bunkley played well in the last games, i dont think he could do any worse than Rayburn.  They need at least one hog in the middle.  Look at the teams that have made the superbowl lately.  You need those big cloggers.  
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on January 15, 2007, 12:35:36 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 15, 2007, 11:37:01 AM
Oh wait, they did that already and he couldnt' crack the starting lineup

he couldnt crack the field

He couldn't crack the team plane. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: hunt on January 15, 2007, 12:35:52 PM
bunkley had 9 tackles all season & i don't remember any of them...i hope i'm wrong but i don't see them addressing the dt position when they just spent two 1st round picks there.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on January 15, 2007, 12:45:53 PM
It's farging sad that after spending our last 2 first rounders at DT... the Eagles still get gashed in the run game as much as they do.  It's not that surprising when you think about it though... because as more and more of Ray Rhodes' defense left, the worse the Eagles became against the run.

Either way... they need to address DT again... early in the draft, if not in FA. 

They CAN'T be satisfied with what they got from the DT's this year, especially Walker (outside of maybe 3 games) and Rayburn.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on January 15, 2007, 12:48:05 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 15, 2007, 11:45:12 AM
man the eagles should thank god andrews turned out to be a player...and they deservingly get credit for him...but outside of the big kid and the sprinkling in of reggie brown lj smith and another guy or two their last four drafts have been a travesty

Are you including the 2006 draft in that?  Granted, it doesn't appear to be a great draft at all but I'm not going to sell it, or at least some of the players taken in it short.  I want to see Bunkley play an entire game.  I don't care if he's terrible, I want to see him on the field.  For a 1st round pick, especially as high as the Eagles selected last year, not putting him on the field makes the pick a complete waste.  

But other than that, basically every draft in the Reid era has only produced one or 2 players who are legitimate contributors to the team with potential long term ability while the rest have been so crappy that flies loom over their heads.  
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: hunt on January 15, 2007, 12:57:07 PM
Quote from: EagleFeva on January 15, 2007, 12:45:53 PM
It's farging sad that after spending our last 2 first rounders at DT... the Eagles still get gashed in the run game as much as they do.  It's not that surprising when you think about it though... because as more and more of Ray Rhodes' defense left, the worse the Eagles became against the run.

Either way... they need to address DT again... early in the draft, if not in FA. 

They CAN'T be satisfied with what they got from the DT's this year, especially Walker (outside of maybe 3 games) and Rayburn.

2006- 26th against the run...15th in total yds...15th in scoring D
2005- 21st against the run...23rd in total yds...27th in scoring D
2004- 16th against the run...10th in total yds...2nd in scoring D
2003- 22nd against the run...20th in total yds...7th in scoring D
2002- 9th against the run...4th in total yds...2nd in scoring D

yeah...it's been a while since they had a run D in the top half of the league.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: DH on January 15, 2007, 01:24:04 PM
In the 06' draft, there was one contributor. ONE. On top of that, there were 2 more or less redshirts, 2 guys on IR, and a WR who was never used.

2006 draft = F.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on January 15, 2007, 02:28:27 PM
if they see Considine as the starting SS next year, i'd just rather them bring back Lewis, because Considine is terrible.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on January 15, 2007, 02:56:37 PM
Considine is more of a FS than SS.  Move Dawk over, he's better against the run, Considine will not be as exposed if he's at FS.  He needs to bulk up.  I can understand him overcoming the shoulder injury/surgery but he needs to get some extra weight to his frame. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Cerevant on January 15, 2007, 02:59:25 PM
Quote from: Seabiscuit36 on January 15, 2007, 02:56:37 PM
Considine is more of a FS than SS.  Move Dawk over, he's better against the run, Considine will not be as exposed if he's at FS.  He needs to bulk up.  I can understand him overcoming the shoulder injury/surgery but he needs to get some extra weight to his frame. 

I'd have to agree with you there - he was looking like Simoneau on Saturday, getting blown backward for 5 yards after the hit.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Mad-Lad on January 15, 2007, 03:00:01 PM
the good thing about Considine is he seemed to be in the right spot most of the time.  If he can get bigger so he won't bounce off guys and/or miss tackles I'd have no problem with him competing for the starting job with whoever they brought in.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on January 15, 2007, 03:01:13 PM
He's not a probowler but he's not bad either.  He's in position to make plays, he just needs to make them more consistently. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on January 15, 2007, 03:04:05 PM
he's not going to turn into Hulk Hogan all of the sudden, he is what he is.  and what he is, is a special teamer.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Munson on January 15, 2007, 03:05:28 PM
I'm still iffy on moving Dawk to SS and putting Considine at FS. Right now I'd rather have Lewis over Considine because at least Lewis can stop the run, instead of being average in both run stopping and pass coverage.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Mad-Lad on January 15, 2007, 03:07:54 PM
Lewis isn't going to be back.  He's piss poor in coverage.  His ability to stop the run wouldnt' be a big deal if the front seven didn't blow so bad.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on January 15, 2007, 03:25:30 PM
This team will draft a safety in the first 2 rounds.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on January 15, 2007, 03:27:01 PM
Quote from: EagleFeva on January 15, 2007, 12:45:53 PM
It's farging sad that after spending our last 2 first rounders at DT... the Eagles still get gashed in the run game as much as they do.  It's not that surprising when you think about it though... because as more and more of Ray Rhodes' defense left, the worse the Eagles became against the run.

Either way... they need to address DT again... early in the draft, if not in FA. 

They CAN'T be satisfied with what they got from the DT's this year, especially Walker (outside of maybe 3 games) and Rayburn.

I don't trust them to draft DTs anymore. I'd rather sign a vet so we don't have to go through the whole learning process again.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 15, 2007, 03:31:36 PM
considine was drafted to be a special teamer...the only reason hes in the lineup is because of lewis' zestyness...much like gaither is only playing because of mccoy sucking so bad
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Munson on January 15, 2007, 03:34:47 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 15, 2007, 03:31:36 PM
considine was drafted to be a special teamer...the only reason hes in the lineup is because of lewis' zestyness...much like gaither is only playing because of mccoy sucking so bad

I understand the shot at Considine...but you don't think Gaither has shown the ability to maybe actually be the WLB for this team for the next few years? He still has a lot to prove, like doing well for more then half a season...but I think he played pretty well, and better then McCoy.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on January 15, 2007, 03:36:24 PM
I think we'll see Gaither Bulk up and become the MLB for next season.  The need to actively pursue to OLB's. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Mad-Lad on January 15, 2007, 03:38:47 PM
(http://lilmarv1117.tripod.com/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderpictures/.pond/jones.jpg.w300h236.jpg)

Throw this guy into the sun.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on January 15, 2007, 03:41:44 PM
Chris Gocong may very well turn out to be a stud, but I don't want to go into next season with him starting. Excuse my skepticism, but the team told us the same thing about McCoy and he turned out to suck. Luckily we had Gaither behind him or else the season would've never ended the way it did.

The team doesn't need to go crazy in free agency this year. They really only need 2 or maybe 3 key pieces. One being a run-stuffing DT and the other a SAM. Then if needed they can evaluate what they are going to do with DE. Will Juqua Thomas stay? What will they do to replace McDougle's snaps on the line? Will Howard stay after a disappointing season?  It would be nice to be able to get some pressure on a QB, and I'd rather just cut Howard and sign or draft a solid DE to play opposite Kearse so Cole can take less snaps and be more effective.

I do think they'll address DT in free agency if anything though. They'll probably sell us Gocong being the future and draft a SAM in the mid round after cutting Dhani. I say sign Adalius Thomas, because if Gocong looks great in camp and we go into the season and he sucks then we are screwed. Even if we sign Thomas and Gocong is a solid player, then we have quality depth if nothing else.

Also logic tells you they go safety early. Lewis is probably gone, Considine sucks, and Dawk is getting older. They will probably take one in the first 2 rounds.

Let's just hope this free agency period goes better than last. Everyone was so excited with all that cap room and then you get the daily Spadaro update and it's "Sorry no visits scheduled today or tomorrow."
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 15, 2007, 03:42:53 PM
but you don't think Gaither has shown the ability to maybe actually be the WLB for this team for the next few years?

maybe yes....i cant tell yet if gaither is good on his own or if hes simply just better than mccoy...i mean he was a 7th round pick...mccoy was so god awful that whoever replaced him was probably going to look better than they really are...i willing to give him the benefit of the doubt for next year...the wil spot is not an offseason priority as far as im concerned...

i didnt mean for it to come off as a criticism of gaither...i was simply saying he was only in the lineup because the guy the coaching staff originally intended to be there was horrid
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on January 15, 2007, 03:44:41 PM
I thought Gaither was a 5th rounder.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Cerevant on January 15, 2007, 03:51:15 PM
Regardless, I'm done with JJ.  I was fine with stinking at run defense when they led the NFL in scoring D.  Now they just stink.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on January 15, 2007, 03:52:47 PM
He was a 5th rounder  Ramsey was the 7th rounder i think
QuoteOmar Gaither
Height: 6-1
Weight: 233
40 Speed: 4.82*
Position: Outside Linebacker
College: Tennessee
Final Grade: G 5.7


GM JR Scouting LLC  Grading Scale/Key  



SUMMARY
Gaither was an interesting player to grade because he is shorter than ideal, lacks good measureables and is not explosive, but because of his smarts, instincts, quickness and competitiveness, he is consistently around the ball and makes a lot more tackles than you expect. In time he will bulk up a little bit (10 pounds) and will only be lacking in height and will be able to play strong at the point of attack more consistently, even when his technique is not ideal. He will need to learn to use his hands better vs. blockers -- to slow their ability to lock up on him and to shed faster once they get ahold of him. His smarts, instincts and quickness will help him be a good coverage linebacker in the NFL -- especially in zone and man-to-man coverage on short, quick-hitting routes. Overall, Gaither will develop into the same type of starting linebacker in the NFL that he was at Tennessee -- solid, but not explosive. He will not only become a solid and consistent linebacker, but he can be a consistent contributor on special teams.

CRITICAL FACTORS
Athletic Ability Initial Quickness Play Strength Competes Play Speed Instincts
6.0 6.0 5.5 6.0 5.5 6.0



STRONG POINTS
Gaither is a good athlete who plays quicker and faster because of his consistent ability to read the play fast. He gets moving at the snap quickly -- whether dropping off ball into zone coverage or rushing the quarterback (not explosive, but quick). He moves well through traffic and his instincts and quickness help him chase down plays in backside pursuit. He covers tight ends/running backs well in man-to-man coverage on short/medium routes and does a good job getting out to the flat and making the tackle right after the catch. He is very good at staying under control and adjusting to tackle well out in space.



WEAKNESSES
Gaither is slightly undersized for a linebacker and, if a blocker can lock up on him, he struggles to shed and make the play. When he takes on blocks up high, he cannot hold ground and gets driven backward and eliminated from the play. While he has quick feet and plays faster than his 40 time chasing after the ball in pursuit, he lacks the explosive closing burst to catch fast players from behind and is not an explosive pass rusher. Despite doing a good job of covering tight ends/running backs on short/medium routes, he will struggle to cover them deep down the seam and lacks the burst to catch up if he loses a step.



POSITIONAL FACTORS
Grade Category Comments/Description
6.0 Read & React He consistently reads and reacts quickly to the play. Good instincts help him get started to the ball fast.
6.0 Initial Quickness His quick feet and instincts help him consistently get started fast at the snap.
5.5 Play Strength He can be strong at the point of attack vs. blockers and as a tackler when he bends his knees and takes on the play with leverage.
6.0 Tackling He consistently does a good job of staying over his feet and under control, which let him adjust to tackle well in space.
5.0 Shed Blocker Once a blocker locks up on Gaither, his lack of bulk/size really hinders his ability to shed quickly.
5.5 Run at Him He sniffs out the run well, avoids blockers well and can make good tackles on runs at him.
6.0 Pursuit/Range His instincts help him consistently read and react quickly to chase down plays in backside pursuit.
5.0 Closing Burst While he lacks an explosive closing burst to the ball, he does close quick enough to finish plays when he gets close.
6.0 Zone Coverage He drops very smoothly in zone, reads and reacts quickly to quarterback/passes, breaks on the ball and makes tackle after catch.
5.5 M/M Coverage He does a good job covering tight ends/running backs in man coverage, but does not show closing burst to break up passes.
6.0 Pass Rush Ability He lacks explosion off the ball, but has good quickness as a blitzer, can outrun offensive tackle around the corner and pressures quarterback.
6.0 Errors Gaither does not make mental errors. His not making plays is due to physical limitations.



ATHLETIC ABILITY Section Grade: 6.0
Gaither is a good athlete who plays faster than his 40 time, which helped him be consistently productive despite being undersized. He has decent foot quickness and actually looks and plays quicker because of his good instincts. He consistently reads and reacts to the play very quickly. He has the flexibility to bend his knees and sink his hips to tackle with good leverage and this combines with his agility to let him consistently adjust and tackle well out in space. His quick read and react helps him accelerate to full speed quickly so he can chase plays down from sideline to sideline. His quick feet also show up in his ability to get moving quickly at the snap when he rushes the passer. He has the athleticism and speed to cover tight ends/running backs on short/medium routes well, but lacks the explosive closing burst to make plays on the ball to break up passes.

Q.A.B. Quick Feet C.O.D. Flexibility Coordination
6.0 6.0 6.0 6.5 6.5



COMPETITIVENESS Section Grade: 6.0
Gaither is a tough linebacker who consistently plays through pain and does not hesitate to throw his body around with reckless abandon to slow up plays and make tackles. He is consistently productive on defense whether it is a normal defensive play or an important one. In the graded games, he was definitely productive being involved in one play out of every 7.3 snaps, which is very good. He has good instincts and is consistently around the ball. He moves through traffic smooth and easy, runs hard to the ball and tackles well out in space. He consistently does a very good job of shooting out to the flat to pick up the running back on dump-off passes and makes tackles right after the catch. More than anything, his ability to stay over his feet and under control help him consistently adjust and tackle well out in space. He can even slow up and adjust to the quick cutback. He needs to do a better job of using his hands to take on and shed blocks quicker because right now, once a blocker gets ahold of him, he is usually eliminated from the play. He is a competitive team player who consistently hustles and chases hard after the ball fron snap to whistle and is willing to throw his body into the path of blockers to slow up the play so his teammates can make the play.

Toughness Clutch Play Production Consistency Team Player Pride/Quit
6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0



MENTAL ALERTNESS Section Grade: 6.0
He is a smart football player and it shows with his good tackling technique, consistently good zone drops and by always carrying out his assignment. His instincts are good and they combine with his foot quickness to let him consistently react quickly to the play. His ability to maintain his focus/concentration is what enables him to be consistently productive despite being undersized and not shedding blocks consistently well.

Learn/Retain Instincts/Reactions Concentration
6.0 6.0 6.0



STRENGTH/EXPLOSION Section Grade: 5.0
Gaither is definitely shorter and lighter than ideal for an outside linebacker, but at slightly over 6-1 and 230 pounds, he is not tiny for an undersized linebacker. He has basically been a durable linebacker at Tennessee, but his lack of bulk/strength and struggles to consistently shed could be a concern in the NFL. He is not an explosive linebacker. He lacks the explosive closing burst in pursuit and does not explode up and make violent tackles/hits. When he stays low and uses his hands aggressively vs. blockers, he has enough strength to play strong at the point of attack and to be a strong tackler vs. big ball carriers, but when he gets up high and lets blockers get into his body, he can be driven out of the play too easily.

Body Type Durability Explosion Play Strength
5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5


Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on January 15, 2007, 03:54:38 PM
McCoy was playing pretty well up till he injured his Shoulder, then he became useless.  I dont think he has the frame to play full time based on his history. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 15, 2007, 03:56:53 PM
yeah my bad i was thinking he was a second 7th rounder with ramsey...but he was the second 5th rounder with bloom
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: mussa on January 15, 2007, 04:03:46 PM
I blame TO for all of this
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Quasimoto on January 15, 2007, 08:25:02 PM
I wouldn't expect Donte' or Juqua Thomas.  Spads is already in full effect over at PE.com.  He's preparing us up for their loss already.  I really liked this line:

I'm sure you will all be patient and support the Eagles' decisions as they happen.

:puke
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on January 15, 2007, 11:14:21 PM
Is it possible that Garcia is the only one of the 11 that returns next year?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MURP on January 15, 2007, 11:23:43 PM
no, it is not.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on January 15, 2007, 11:29:18 PM
oh yeah...Mahe comes back too
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Don Ho on January 16, 2007, 02:59:19 AM
Quote from: BigEd76 on January 15, 2007, 11:29:18 PM
oh yeah...Mahe comes back too

:-D :-D :-D god I needed that!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on January 16, 2007, 03:49:45 AM
I don't expect much from free agency after last year's debacle. They better re-sign Stallworth and Garcia though. I'm not even going to get into free agents from other teams. Do whatever they have to. One thing I like about this board is that there are very few if any Eagles apologists. If Stallworth and Garcia aren't back then they will get buried on here and I'll love it, because they'd deserve it.

It would be a travesty not to go for it this year though after being so damn close. Do whatever you have to, to retain your good pieces and bring in new pieces to shure up the defense.

But, again, I don't expect much from this front office. They'll have to show me they are serious about winning, because I blame the season being over on the front office for not making the right decisions to fix the defense. The real culprit for us losing to the Saints goes all the way back to march and april. Bad draft and bad free agent signings minus Garcia = bad defense.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: pinoyboy2pt0 on January 16, 2007, 06:52:29 AM
I wonder how much better our special teams could be if we didn't carry 10 (?) lineman everygame.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: hunt on January 16, 2007, 08:34:56 AM
Quote from: pinoyboy2pt0 on January 16, 2007, 06:52:29 AM
I wonder how much better our special teams could be if we didn't carry 10 (?) lineman everygame.

so you don't like the eagles starting every drive at their own 20 while the opposition starts at the 35?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on January 16, 2007, 08:38:25 AM
Ugh! How could I have forgotten?

If Andy Reid isn't going anywhere, and he isn't, then Both Jim Johnson and Harbaugh need to hit the farging road. Have you ever seen a team with a worse return game than the Eagles? They are a travesty.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: hunt on January 16, 2007, 08:45:33 AM
their coverage teams suck too...24th in ko return coverage & 21st in punt return coverage.


btw, they were 28th in ko returns & (surprisingly) 10th in punt returns...although their longest was only 23 yards.





Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 16, 2007, 08:50:37 AM
the special teams blocking units are ok i believe...its the fact that andy refuses to put the best return men for the job back there...even tho it was called back how angry did it make you to see westbrook take that one back vs the giants....i immediately thought to myself what if he was returning kicks all year...or even lito...maybe they win one of those close games they lost...tampa for example...new orleans...and instead of playing in the dome they are in the linc for the divisional round
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on January 16, 2007, 08:54:17 AM
All this stuff is noise to me compared to that 4th & 15 punt.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Zanshin on January 16, 2007, 09:07:07 AM
I don't think I chimed in on this thread yet.  Resign Stallworth and Garcia.  Try to keep Hood, even though it won't happen.  Throw Dhani Jones off of the Walt Whitman.  Let Mike Lewis walk.  Jettison some of the backup flotsom we hold at the Oline spot.  Get a better and more reliable RB option than Buck/Moats/Mahe.  Help Mahe get extra hours at Chickie and Pete's.  Hide some 'roids in Considine's powerbars.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Geowhizzer on January 16, 2007, 09:17:52 AM
I agree with most of the points.

1.  I want Stallworth re-signed.  I just don't think it will happen.

2.  I want Garcia re-signed.  He did a great job of piloting the ship after McNabb went down.

3.  Hood - make an effort, but it will be a token one, I'm sure.

4.  Lewis - Bye.

5.  Dhani - Get the @#*(@*&# out!

6.  Mahe - Say hello to the skier.  He's your ticket out of town.  If his precious ankles can handle the stress.

7.  Coaching - I don't see any changes. There should be some, but there won't be any, other than MAYBE a token sacrifice of some position coach.  Even JJ leaving would surprise me.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: troyhstewart on January 16, 2007, 01:02:21 PM
Quote from: Mad-Lad on January 15, 2007, 03:07:54 PM
Lewis isn't going to be back.  He's piss poor in coverage.  His ability to stop the run wouldnt' be a big deal if the front seven didn't blow so bad.

I'm on this line of thinking. I want safeties who can cover. I want the front 7 to stop the run.

1.  I'd like to see all the coaches except Harbaugh and Castillo fired, but that will never happen.  I'll settle for Jim Johnson. I'd love to see a DC who places emphasis on stopping the run.

2.  revamp the D-line- Howard, McDougal and Walker need to go. Re-sign Thomas. get a 340 lb monster for the middle.

3.  New SAM LB - Dhani needs to go. The LB from SD would be good. IF Gocong turns out to be a player, they could move him to MLB short term.

4. New 3rd CB - I'd settle for James, but I'd prefer one high in the draft with better size than the starters.

5. Complimentary RB to #36- Turner from SD or a draft pick sounds good to me. Somebody that goes around 230 and can push the pile.

6.  Re-sign Stallworth to a reasonable contract. If he's going to demand Reggie Wayne money, then C-YA.  I want a WR that plays more than 10 games a year.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on January 16, 2007, 02:09:54 PM
Oh yeah..>GET HAMLIN
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 16, 2007, 02:22:21 PM
the defense wasnt good this year but next year it has the potential to be a complete disaster....

other than the corners and killa you have:

young players who cant get it done (patterson mccoy considine gaither(?) bunkley)

middle aged players who suck (dhani walker lewis)

30+ players who are on the downside of their careers coming back from injury or not full timers anymore (dawkins kearse trotter howard)

i just dont see how even the best of offseasons can stop this defense from being terrible next year

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Event Horizon on January 16, 2007, 02:25:57 PM
Quote from: hunt on January 16, 2007, 08:34:56 AM
Quote from: pinoyboy2pt0 on January 16, 2007, 06:52:29 AM
I wonder how much better our special teams could be if we didn't carry 10 (?) lineman everygame.

so you don't like the eagles starting every drive at their own 20 while the opposition starts at the 35?

Anybody, other than Mahe, back there and the Eagles get at least three TDs. Any Mahe run past the 35 is likely a big return if not a score. Just another example in a long line of Reid stupidity. I hope Bloom helps us forget how bad things were this year.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: cj2112 on January 16, 2007, 04:58:51 PM
I really have no idea how Bloom can be counted on for jack.  The guy hasn't played in a long time; he's never played pro ball; and who knows if he can even make the team.  Mahe blows but at least he's got a tad of experience.

I think they can squeeze one more season out of Dawk and the Axeman.  The thing that scares me the most is that our linebacker play is so consistently weak.  I hate to look to NO for good linebacker play but we saw how their outside linebackers affected our running game, especially by taking away the cutback.  Strong linebacking play can partially compensate for a weak pass rush.  This killed us this year and I have no confidence this will be fixed.    Assuming Dhani and Barber are gone, relying on a semi-experienced Gaither,  an inexperienced Gocong and a Trotter shapes up to be as weak a unit as we have had in recent years. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Event Horizon on January 16, 2007, 05:33:21 PM
Quote from: cj2112 on January 16, 2007, 04:58:51 PM
I really have no idea how Bloom can be counted on for jack.  The guy hasn't played in a long time; he's never played pro ball; and who knows if he can even make the team.  Mahe blows but at least he's got a tad of experience.

Sure, Bloom can't be counted on for jack. However, what would real speed add to the unit? It all depends on whether Bloom can be trusted to actually field the ball. If that is something he can do on a consistent basis, there is every reason to assume he is a huge upgrade. The problem might be finding another position where he could help. Mahe could provide a body in KO coverage, RB depth and returns. Unless the FO brings in people who can provide what might be lost by cutting Mahe, he probably has the inside shot at keeping the job. That's a really sad commentary on the make-up of the team. Mediocre at many positions to free up a spot at the back end of the roster says a lot about the choices on the front end of the roster.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Geowhizzer on January 16, 2007, 05:36:09 PM
Bloom should easily get more return yards than Reno.  At least until he's broken in half.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Eaglez on January 16, 2007, 07:09:37 PM
Is there any chance that the Skins let TJ Duckett go considering they have Betts and still have Portis (for now)?

I'd like to see him in Philly. He's the 'big back' everyone would be clamoring for and can pick up tough yards behind that line. Garcia will be back -- he just doesn't want to move. Everyone wants Stallworth back. If those are taken care of I like the prospects of the offense next year.

The D does have the potential to be a disaster. That, more than anything, needs to be the focal point of the offseason. Hopefully getting some competent defensive players will bolster the special teams as well.



Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 16, 2007, 07:18:32 PM
i found these comments by reid in the inky today to be quite revealing concerning stallworth...


"Donté did a nice job for us down the stretch," Reid said. (minimizing his contribution by complimenting him in the most minimalist way) "It was just a matter of him being healthy and being out there." (the seeds are being planted here for a health excuse as to why they didnt resign him)

"Once he got that worked out, he did a pretty good job for us," (youd think he was talking about omar gaither here not the best wr on the team) Reid said. "I felt good when he was in there. I felt good when he wasn't in there. (we arent much better with him than without him...in other words he isnt really worth the money hes gonna ask for) We had some good young players that could play and Donté was a nice addition to the whole group." (again minimalizing donte in addition to planting the seed of another excuse....if the injury thing doesnt fly they will go with how baskett and avant are more than capable of replacing stallworth)


in other words say bye bye to donte

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 16, 2007, 07:24:32 PM
Stallworth's gone which is a damn shame considering how deep, young, and talented our WR position could be for the forseeable future. What sucks even more is what we have now is what we'll have once the season starts, while the money we could have used to sign him will sit there until next offseason. But I'm sure Andy will sign some good backups instead.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on January 16, 2007, 07:36:44 PM
Oh well.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on January 16, 2007, 07:38:18 PM
Irate.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Eaglez on January 16, 2007, 07:39:19 PM
Yeah. It seems like Reid is 'planting the seed'. His deep threat capabilities will sorely be missed.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on January 16, 2007, 07:49:51 PM
But guys, Baskett had two long TDs this year. He's got all the speed the team needs. Besides, it's all about scheme, not speed. Der.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Wingspan on January 16, 2007, 07:50:55 PM
Quote from: Eaglez on January 16, 2007, 07:09:37 PM
Is there any chance that the Skins let TJ Duckett go considering they have Betts and still have Portis (for now)?

I'd like to see him in Philly. He's the 'big back' everyone would be clamoring for and can pick up tough yards behind that line. Garcia will be back -- he just doesn't want to move. Everyone wants Stallworth back. If those are taken care of I like the prospects of the offense next year.

The D does have the potential to be a disaster. That, more than anything, needs to be the focal point of the offseason. Hopefully getting some competent defensive players will bolster the special teams as well.





I heard from somewhere (i think a DC insider) that the only reason that Duckett is on the taterskins at all was to keep him from going to the eagles, who were making an offer for the guy and the skins upped it at the last minute. This came from DC, i never heard it in the local philly media.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on January 16, 2007, 07:52:52 PM
How tricky of them! What cunning tacticians they are! Now he will be available again and the Eagles can pick him up or not if they want and the taterskins will have neither helped their team not kept the Eagles from winning the division. BRILLIANT!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Wingspan on January 16, 2007, 07:54:50 PM
that kinda thing was made gibbs good the first time around, when there was no cap. so it's not all that surprising that he'd think it work again.

i don't know how true it is. it's a second hand source, at best.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on January 16, 2007, 07:58:04 PM
Either way, it's an opportunity to make fun of the Skins so I'll take it. I would also take Duckett. For the record.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Drunkmasterflex on January 16, 2007, 10:07:10 PM
That little quote there from Reid pretty much is the kiss of death.  It is a real shame they couldn't have gotten something done sooner.  The only way Stallworth could possibly be back is if they get something done before FA.  He is by far the best option in a very weak FA group of WRs.  I guess we can look forward to the Eagles taking another WR in the 3rd round who will probably be cut within the next 3-4 years.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MURP on January 16, 2007, 10:26:22 PM
Great, the Eagles finally have a decent pair of WR's and they lose it after ONE fargin season.  Makes me sick.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Quasimoto on January 16, 2007, 10:26:54 PM
The only way I'd be happy with not re-signing Stallworth is if we drafted Calvin Johnson.  Which wont happen.  So I wont be happy.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on January 16, 2007, 11:14:29 PM
So you wanted Andy to say "Stallworth was awesome in the playoffs" while Rosenhaus is listening?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on January 16, 2007, 11:25:08 PM
I want Andy to sign his best receiver, who's done nothing but toe the line since he got here. Instead of pre-emptively dismiss him as an important piece of the offense.

Too late for that though, so I'll settle fo Andy resigning, or walking out into traffic.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: General_Failure on January 16, 2007, 11:35:32 PM
Andy will never run out into traffic. He'd pass out on the sidewalk.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on January 17, 2007, 12:30:15 AM
We'll never win a Superbowl with this front office.

But it is still way too early to decide whether or not Stallworth is back. It isn't even feb yet.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: General_Failure on January 17, 2007, 02:44:10 AM
They're totally getting Javon Walker instead.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on January 17, 2007, 03:13:29 AM
Garcia for Walker in a sign and trade. I heard Denver needs a QB.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 17, 2007, 08:04:35 AM
So you wanted Andy to say "Stallworth was awesome in the playoffs" while Rosenhaus is listening?

you dont get it

the comments reid made werent to try and influence negotiations....they were the beginnings of what the company line will be when they let stallworth walk

do you really think what andy reid says publically is going to determine what rosenhaus wants and gets for stallworth...gimme a break...the market will dictate what he gets and both reid and rosenhaus know how good donte is

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 17, 2007, 08:42:57 AM
from the FWIW department....

apparently patterson is even worse than we all thought

baldinger was on wip saying how he studied the film from saturday and jahri evans absolutelty ate pattersons lunch saturday....jahri evans i think most of us remember was the kid from bloomsburg 4th round rookie this year...he also said that as bad as darwin walker is and as much criticism as he takes hes still a better player than patterson and has been all year

patterson baldinger says simply cant play

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on January 17, 2007, 08:49:19 AM
I've hear the exact opposite of that all year.  Stanley CUP
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhanInDC on January 17, 2007, 09:14:25 AM
On the Bloom front, from PE.com:

Quote
Will Bloom Spark Return Game?
January 16, 2007
By SHANE EVANS

When he was drafted, Jeremy Bloom hadn't played football in two years. He concentrated on skiing in college after he wasn't allowed to continue with his football career, because of the money he made skiing, a ruling that Bloom fought diligently to overturn.

Since being selected in the fifth round of last year's draft, Bloom has been forced to take another year off from football because of a lingering hamstring problem that landed him a spot on the Injured Reserve list August 29.

This time, however, Bloom wasn't totally dejected at the idea of being away from the game that he loves because of how much he can gain while recovers.

"There's a positive side and then there's a negative side," said Bloom. "The upside for me is a little more for me than the average football player coming in and being on IR their first year. I've been away from the game for two years and it's been such an advantage to me to be able to break down film, study guys I respect, run routes, focus on the playbook and do all the things that I couldn't necessarily focus all my attention on if I were playing this year. For me, there is definitely a huge upside."

When Bloom was on the field at the University of Colorado, he was an explosive wide receiver and kick returner who had five plays of 75 yards or longer in his two-year career (two receptions, two punt returns and one kick return). Bloom was drafted primarily to help in the return game, where the Eagles have not had a kickoff return for a touchdown since 2001 and a punt return for a score since 2003.

Bloom was able to make the delegation to the Injured Reserve list into something extremely positive because of how much he can do to get his body into true football shape before he next season.

The physical transition for Bloom from skiing to football was a huge one. He had to get the proper muscles working again at their maximum ability. As difficult as the physical transition was, the mental aspect of the game was definitely more resonant. Bloom hadn't played in an organized game of football since he was a sophomore in college. As this season concluded, Bloom felt almost completely comfortable with this complex variation of the West Coast offense.

"As far as my position, I feel like I have grasped the playbook about 99.9% just with regards to my responsibility," said Bloom. "Now, I need to translate that understanding to the field against a defensive back, with all the live bullets coming right at me."

Bloom kept optimistic during the entire season, despite not being able to play. He credited that to just having a good outlook on life and his acuity towards how he will grow in the long run.

"I believe life is perception," said Bloom. "That's how I approach everything. I've not felt sorry for myself for not being out there, but just trying to take advantage of everything that I can do while not playing."

It will only be a few months before Bloom can see if his year in training pays off.

Propaganda machine is getting fired up. I had almost forgotten the dude hasn't played in a full speed game in three years. I can see how this works: they'll put all their stock in Bloom to be the returner, then if it appears it isn't going to pan out, they'll put the "safe" guy back in there (Read: Mahe or some dude off the waiver wire).
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on January 17, 2007, 09:58:38 AM
Well, if Brian Baldinger says it, it must be true.

:-D


(Not saying he's wrong, btw.)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on January 17, 2007, 10:10:03 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 17, 2007, 08:42:57 AM
from the FWIW department....

apparently patterson is even worse than we all thought

baldinger was on wip saying how he studied the film from saturday and jahri evans absolutelty ate pattersons lunch saturday....jahri evans i think most of us remember was the kid from bloomsburg 4th round rookie this year...he also said that as bad as darwin walker is and as much criticism as he takes hes still a better player than patterson and has been all year

patterson baldinger says simply cant play

Team Patterson says, "At least we suck less than Bunkley.  Holler."
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Mad-Lad on January 17, 2007, 10:40:11 AM
"Donté did a nice job for us down the stretch," Reid said. (minimizing his contribution by complimenting him in the most minimalist way)

That's been Andy's catch phrase for any player who played well during his tenure in Philly.  If Westbrook ran for 1000 yards  and 50 touchdowns in one game he'd still get the same response.  "Brian did a nice job out there today.  Are there areas where he can improve?  Yes."  I don't think that has anything to do with him trying to let the fans down easy regarding Stalloworth not signing for the long haul.  Everyone's reading WAY too much into a press conference.  The season's over.  We'll see what happens with the free agents when the time comes.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 17, 2007, 10:48:02 AM
then how do you explain this comment about aj feely...a friggin third string qb...

"I think A.J. could step in and do a heck of a job,"
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Mad-Lad on January 17, 2007, 10:50:42 AM
who's to say he can't?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 17, 2007, 10:54:09 AM
my question is why is he raving about feely and he did the same with garcia at that press conference.....but is using as you say 'catch phrases' when it comes to stallworth....talking about his injury how the team is fine when hes in there and fine when he isnt...
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhanInDC on January 17, 2007, 11:07:56 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 17, 2007, 10:54:09 AM
my question is why is he raving about feely and he did the same with garcia at that press conference.....but is using as you say 'catch phrases' when it comes to stallworth....talking about his injury how the team is fine when hes in there and fine when he isnt...

Simple answer? AR is a nazi. Feely is an aryan. Stallworth......not so much.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Mad-Lad on January 17, 2007, 11:10:11 AM
Two quick Google searches:

Quote from: Andy Reid Jan 07, 2007
Opening Comments: ...Guys hung in there and it was good to see David (Akers) get the winning kick there at the end. He was sure poise and did a nice job with it.

On the impact of bringing in Koy Detmer: "It's tough on all three of those guys. Jon (Dorenbos) is new with us and David (Akers) has kind of been the cog in there. He has been there a while, but the other guys worked it out and Koy (Detmer) did a nice job. That is the reason we brought him here, he's got great hands."

On the performance of quarterback Jeff Garcia: "He did a good job. He was off by a hair on a couple throws but he'll make those. That's going to happen. Give credit to them. They did a nice job on a couple of long balls, defended them.

On how Brian Westbrook was able to go around and through the Giants defense: "He did a nice job. He was very patient. He let things develop in front of him and hit it. We always talk about 'it's not speed to the hole, its speed through the hole' and he's developed a good feel for that over the years and you saw it today."

On whether he thinks the team is playing better now than when they played the Saints earlier in the season: "We were playing pretty good at that time. They did a heck of a job against us. They beat us. They did a real nice job against us."

Quote from: Andy Reid Sep 14, 2005
Opening remarks: "We look forward to the opportunity of playing the San Francisco 49ers. The players today were able to see just what kind of football team they are and how much they have improved. They have really done a nice job. [Head] coach [Mike] Nolan has done a heck of a job with that football team. They played their hearts out against the Rams and I know they will do the same when they come in here. Our football team will be prepared for that and ready to go."

If you're that concerned about the difference between 'nice job' and 'heck of a job', you're in for a long offseason.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 17, 2007, 11:19:35 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 17, 2007, 08:42:57 AM
from the FWIW department....

apparently patterson is even worse than we all thought

baldinger was on wip saying how he studied the film from saturday and jahri evans absolutelty ate pattersons lunch saturday....jahri evans i think most of us remember was the kid from bloomsburg 4th round rookie this year...he also said that as bad as darwin walker is and as much criticism as he takes hes still a better player than patterson and has been all year

patterson baldinger says simply cant play



I don't blame Patterson and Walker as much as  I blame JJ for making them play 90% of the defensive snaps. I want a run stuffer at DT (you know, a guy like Hollis Thomas) for 1st and 2nd down, then they can rotate a guy like Patterson into the mix.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhanInDC on January 17, 2007, 11:29:02 AM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on January 17, 2007, 11:19:35 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 17, 2007, 08:42:57 AM
from the FWIW department....

apparently patterson is even worse than we all thought

baldinger was on wip saying how he studied the film from saturday and jahri evans absolutelty ate pattersons lunch saturday....jahri evans i think most of us remember was the kid from bloomsburg 4th round rookie this year...he also said that as bad as darwin walker is and as much criticism as he takes hes still a better player than patterson and has been all year

patterson baldinger says simply cant play



I don't blame Patterson and Walker as much as  I blame JJ for making them play 90% of the defensive snaps. I want a run stuffer at DT (you know, a guy like Hollis Thomas) for 1st and 2nd down, then they can rotate a guy like Patterson into the mix.

Let me first say I think Baldinger is a pud, but I have read and listened to a lot of so called experts that say Patterson isn't anything special, and gets manhandled at times. Patterson getting his lunch eaten by a rookie, doesn't bode well at all in any situation. This infers that Patterson was getting handled soundly in most facets of his game. I would be cool with Patterson getting rotated in, switching out with a run stuffer, if he were  a "specialist" - excellent at pressuring the QB, or chasing down screens, etc., but I don't remember him great in that department either. I think if you reduced his time to keep him fresh, or what have you, you'd just see him being a non-factor less often.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 17, 2007, 11:50:23 AM
I disagree, he definitely played better in the beginning of the season when JJ was using a lot of rotations.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhanInDC on January 17, 2007, 11:59:25 AM
I think he played slightly better as well when kept fresh, but even then, I don't remember him being a disruptive force or consistently playing well. You also have to remember that in the beginning of the season, Kearse was on the end of the line, and the whole line was playing better. Howard looked like a great addition, Cole was off the chain, etc., Patterson didn't wow with his playmaking, but was average-to-solid at best.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 17, 2007, 12:16:30 PM
Quote from: PhillyPhaninDC on January 17, 2007, 11:59:25 AM
Patterson didn't wow with his playmaking, but was average-to-solid at best.

I never claimed otherwise, just that while used in a rotation he was more effective. He's not builty to play that many downs.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on January 17, 2007, 12:17:34 PM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on January 17, 2007, 11:50:23 AM
I disagree, he definitely played better in the beginning of the season when JJ was using a lot of rotations.

It's the same thing every season now.  A couple of injuries, and they have to abandon the rotation anyway.  Frankly, they either need to get more linemen that don't slow down so badly over the course of the season, or they need to get depth that can actually play.  Adios to McDougle, Rayburn, etc.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 17, 2007, 12:21:07 PM
If you're that concerned about the difference between 'nice job' and 'heck of a job', you're in for a long offseason

im not concerned at all with that...and i blame myself for even responding to what you posted...im not trying to get into spin...i posted reids comments on stallworth and i believe they are clear as day...but if you choose to believe it was just coach speak and that stallworth is coming back thats your perogotive
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 17, 2007, 12:27:21 PM
It's the same thing every season now.  A couple of injuries, and they have to abandon the rotation anyway

seriously

its good to have depth but you win and lose with how good your starters are...the eagles starters whoever you consider them to be in that rotation are not good enough

i ask again as i did when it happened why the hell did patterson get that new contract

i can live with them guessing wrong on a low first round draft pick...shtein happens and at least they didnt trade up like they did with mcdougle or grab patterson top 15 like with bunkley...

but what i do have a problem with is rewarding players with a new deal who may never deserve a second contract much less get one a year and a half into their career
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Quasimoto on January 17, 2007, 12:28:01 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 17, 2007, 12:21:07 PM
If you're that concerned about the difference between 'nice job' and 'heck of a job', you're in for a long offseason

im not concerned at all with that...and i blame myself for even responding to what you posted...im not trying to get into spin...i posted reids comments on stallworth and i believe they are clear as day...but if you choose to believe it was just coach speak and that stallworth is coming back thats your perogotive

Everybody's talking all this stuff about me
Why don't they just let me live? (Everybody)
I don't need permission, make my own decisions (Oh!)
That's my prerogative
That's my prerogative
(It's my prerogative)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on January 17, 2007, 12:28:13 PM
I don't know how anyone can ever assume that when the Eagles allow someone to hit the open market, they'll be back.  The only players that come back do it for less money, and Stallworth has very little to no reason to give the Eagles a discount.  Plus, his agent is Rosenhaus.

I give his return maybe a 10% chance of happening at best.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Cerevant on January 17, 2007, 12:31:58 PM
The only reason the Stallworth issue is still in doubt is because of the conditions of the trade - we all know how greedy the Eagles are with their Draft picks, and if they think they can sign Stallworth after FA starts, then why would they waste the pick?

Personally I think they should make the move so he never sees the open market, but it is clear they want to wait until FA regardless of what their plans ultimately are.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 17, 2007, 12:38:35 PM
ill go with 10%

only way he comes back is if the eagles cake him off big time and then that essentially is their free agency period...the more likely scenario....they let stallworth walk...go with avant and baskett at the wr psoition and use their money to get a few middling players to fill other spots


The only reason the Stallworth issue is still in doubt is because of the conditions of the trade - we all know how greedy the Eagles are with their Draft picks


i just cant believe that...if it was the difference between a 3rd and no pick i could maybe buy it...but the difference btwn a 3rd and 4th...come on now...if anything the draft pick thing gives me more hope that he will get signed because otherwise they wasted a 4th rounder on a guy who played 12 games with them
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Quasimoto on January 17, 2007, 12:44:01 PM
The draft pick is a main sticking point for the Eagles.  They hoard them like gold.  Why do you think we have 10 picks almost every year it feels like?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 17, 2007, 12:47:54 PM
but they technically wouldnt be losing a draft pick per se if they didnt sign him...they already lost a pick by trading for him...if they sign him they lose a three rather than a four...

i guess no one really knows what they are thinking...but if they are seriously against signing him over 32 spots in the draft then they should all be in front of the firing squad
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on January 17, 2007, 12:51:05 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 17, 2007, 12:38:35 PM
go with avant and baskett at the wr psoition

Don't forget... Bloom coming back next year!  Yay!

Quote from: Cerevant on January 17, 2007, 12:31:58 PM
The only reason the Stallworth issue is still in doubt is because of the conditions of the trade - we all know how greedy the Eagles are with their Draft picks, and if they think they can sign Stallworth after FA starts, then why would they waste the pick?

I think his sporadic health issues throughout the season had something to do with it too.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on January 17, 2007, 12:54:20 PM
QuoteMcNabb to break silence on Friday
By GEOFF MOSHER, The News Journal

Posted Wednesday, January 17, 2007 at 11:28 am

Donovan McNabb injured his knee Nov. 19. It's not clear if he will be healthy in time for the 2007 season opener.

News Journal file/GINGER WALL
PHILADELPHIA — Eagles quarterback Donovan McNabb is scheduled to speak to the media at noon Friday, breaking his self-imposed silence since tearing up his right knee in a Nov. 19 game against Tennessee.

McNabb was placed on injured reserve and backup Jeff Garcia went 6-1 during the regular season, including a six-game win streak that propelled the Eagles to the NFC East title and No. 3 seed in the playoffs.

In his final press conference of the season Monday, Eagles coach Andy Reid said it's still too early to predict whether McNabb will be ready for the 2007 season opener.

Most anterior cruciate ligament tears require eight to 12 months of rehabiliation after surgery. McNabb underwent surgery in November in Birmingham, Ala. and has been rehabbing in Philadelphia since early December.

While Garcia rallied the team, McNabb purposely stayed behind the scenes to avoid causing any distractions.

Before he injured his knee, McNabb had thrown for 2,647 yards in 10 starts to go along with 18 touchdowns and six interceptions. His 57 percent completion percentage was the second worst of his career and worst as a full-time starter
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 17, 2007, 12:56:01 PM
I think his sporadic health issues throughout the season had something to do with it too.

they shoulda cut mcnabb long ago then
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on January 17, 2007, 12:56:36 PM
QuoteWhile Garcia rallied the team, McNabb purposely stayed behind the scenes to avoid causing any distractions.

Um... except when he was copping the in-game pics before Garcia had a chance to look at them in the wild-card game.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 17, 2007, 12:57:53 PM
and when his mother said that she hoped the eagles didnt win
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Quasimoto on January 17, 2007, 01:14:54 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 17, 2007, 12:47:54 PM
but they technically wouldnt be losing a draft pick per se if they didnt sign him...they already lost a pick by trading for him...if they sign him they lose a three rather than a four...

i guess no one really knows what they are thinking...but if they are seriously against signing him over 32 spots in the draft then they should all be in front of the firing squad

I agree.  The difference is one round and in the end it's not really going to make a difference.  There's a 90 percent chance whoever we pick in those spots is going to suck anyway.  Maybe we could just offer them Ryan Moats instead.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Drunkmasterflex on January 17, 2007, 01:16:38 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 17, 2007, 12:57:53 PM
and when his mother said that she hoped the eagles didnt win

Did she really say that?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 17, 2007, 01:21:17 PM
2006-12-27
Bittersweet
The win this week was great and I could actually say that's what I wanted for Christmas. Yes, now we have solidly beat the Cowboys with my son and without him. But I can hear you asking, mama McNabb what are you really thinking? Well here it is, the real deal. It's kind of bitter sweet for me as my son, the quarterback sits out on injured reserved watching the game during his rehab. I polled my family too and they feel the same. We want our team to win and even go to the Superbowl and win it in Miami especially if they continue to play as they have. But oh oh, if they win the Superbowl without my son, what would be the real outcome with the fans? Will they crucify him? Maybe, then the trade talks would begin. Off season madness, worse than last year's fiasco. But guess what, I guess I'll have to take the beating if it comes. I would have to hope that scenario of the madness would not happen or be that bad. Well let's wait and see. Bitter sweet.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Mad-Lad on January 17, 2007, 01:55:40 PM
that's an awful wordy way of saying that there are too many idiot eagles fans who hate donovan and a superbowl win would add fuel to their clueless fire.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 17, 2007, 02:12:00 PM
I'm a Mcnabb fan and all but maybe if he would embrace the fans and let go of the shtein that happened on draft day they'd be less critical.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 17, 2007, 02:17:26 PM
or act like you care when you lose...mcnabb loses the superbowl and all he says is how they cant wait to get back at next year...garcia loses a divisional round and is crying his eyes out in the locker room saying how this is gonna eat at him for a long long time

it all goes back to mcnabb wanting to win but not caring if he loses...and when he does lose him and his family get the added bonus of seeing the eagle fans who they cant stand lose as well
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on January 17, 2007, 02:19:29 PM
If McNabb had won us a Super Bowl by now, fans would be literally bowing at his feet whenever he passed by.

He's been a great quarterback for the team and he's been an outstanding role model for kids, etc.  But the bottom line is, he hasn't won the big one yet and until he does, he's nothing but a loser in a lot of fans' eyes.

Regardless, his happy-go-lucky nature will never win over rank & file Eagles fans.  If he would show some piss & vinegar even occasionally, it might be a different story.   But he won't because that's not him. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Mad-Lad on January 17, 2007, 02:25:24 PM
I love that "he" hasn't won the big one.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on January 17, 2007, 02:29:19 PM
We're talking about why fans don't like McNabb, right?   :paranoid
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Quasimoto on January 17, 2007, 02:30:57 PM
Thats the one thing I really enjoyed about having Garcia running the offense.  He was up in someone's face if they messed up a block or dropped a pass.  With McNabb he just claps his hands and says "We'll get 'em next time." 

Come on Dmac!  Fire up your troops!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on January 17, 2007, 04:54:27 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 17, 2007, 08:42:57 AM
from the FWIW department....

apparently patterson is even worse than we all thought

baldinger was on wip saying how he studied the film from saturday and jahri evans absolutelty ate pattersons lunch saturday....jahri evans i think most of us remember was the kid from bloomsburg 4th round rookie this year...he also said that as bad as darwin walker is and as much criticism as he takes hes still a better player than patterson and has been all year

patterson baldinger says simply cant play



I said that back in midseason. He sucks. Him and Walker both suck and get blown off the ball on every play.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Drunkmasterflex on January 17, 2007, 05:15:53 PM
Patterson is miscast as an everydown player.  The problem for him is that nobody else has stepped up and played well enough to warrant more playing time.  Hopefully, guys like Ramsey and Bunkley make big strides next season. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on January 17, 2007, 05:26:52 PM
Or they sign a big DT to fill that void. It might actually be to our advantage that there isn't a big name out there, because we could fill that void on the cheap.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Drunkmasterflex on January 17, 2007, 05:32:10 PM
Quote from: King Cole on January 17, 2007, 05:26:52 PM
Or they sign a big DT to fill that void. It might actually be to our advantage that there isn't a big name out there, because we could fill that void on the cheap.

The Eagles just don't believe in "big" DTs.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: mussa on January 17, 2007, 05:33:24 PM
Or big RB'S
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Magical_Retard on January 17, 2007, 05:50:04 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 17, 2007, 02:17:26 PM
or act like you care when you lose...mcnabb loses the superbowl and all he says is how they cant wait to get back at next year...garcia loses a divisional round and is crying his eyes out in the locker room saying how this is gonna eat at him for a long long time

it all goes back to mcnabb wanting to win but not caring if he loses...and when he does lose him and his family get the added bonus of seeing the eagle fans who they cant stand lose as well

ur joking right? his mom said exactly what a lot of ppl were already saying....in fact fox sports had some absurd rumor already up about mcnabb being traded to minn. she said she would be happy but it would be bittersweet...well no shtein of course it would be for the mother of the starting player. but she said she was rooting for the team. we all know she should shut up and not even talk but i dont see anything wrong she said, esp if she is looking at how the fans would react.

2ndly mcnabb doesnt care about winning? ive given into to the whole fire andy reid thing cause i really cant believe the game he called in NO, but how in the world do you know he doesnt care? did he come tell u? just cause he didnt cry like romo or he isnt a firey guy like garcia? its almost like b4 the first dallas game this yr when you kept saying mcnabb doesnt have the mental toughness or that he wont be up for this dallas game....seriously are you his butt buddy that you know all his personal feelings? if anything i would THINK mcnabb hates losing, and thats from yrs of dissapointment and his comments on those big losses. what did u want mcnabb to say after the superbowl? him saying he cant wait to get back next yr is wrong?

mcnabb can never ever win over ppl like you. even if he wins a superbowl here in philly you will find something obscure in his press conference saying "omg he didnt really care if they won".

i guess mcnabb has got to build up street cred or something...he has to cry in press conferences, call out players, and pump his fists cause apparently showing emotion means u care and not showing emotion means u just dont care and are there for the ride. brilliant deductions.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on January 17, 2007, 05:52:30 PM
Quote from: Eaglez on January 16, 2007, 07:09:37 PM
Is there any chance that the Skins let TJ Duckett go considering they have Betts and still have Portis (for now)?

I'd like to see him in Philly. He's the 'big back' everyone would be clamoring for and can pick up tough yards behind that line. Garcia will be back -- he just doesn't want to move. Everyone wants Stallworth back. If those are taken care of I like the prospects of the offense next year.

The D does have the potential to be a disaster. That, more than anything, needs to be the focal point of the offseason. Hopefully getting some competent defensive players will bolster the special teams as well.

Duckett is a small back hiding in a big backs body. He tip toes too much and doesn't run with authority. That's why ATL ended up souring on him. He's kind of like Ron Dayne in the sense that they are both bigger guys who were tried out in short yardage roles and failed miserably.

I'd rather have Ryan Moats than TJ Duckett to be honest.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on January 17, 2007, 05:53:34 PM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on January 17, 2007, 05:52:30 PM
I'd rather have Ryan Moats than TJ Duckett to be honest.

That's utterly stupid.  Stop it.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Magical_Retard on January 17, 2007, 05:55:40 PM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on January 17, 2007, 05:52:30 PM
Quote from: Eaglez on January 16, 2007, 07:09:37 PM
Is there any chance that the Skins let TJ Duckett go considering they have Betts and still have Portis (for now)?

I'd like to see him in Philly. He's the 'big back' everyone would be clamoring for and can pick up tough yards behind that line. Garcia will be back -- he just doesn't want to move. Everyone wants Stallworth back. If those are taken care of I like the prospects of the offense next year.

The D does have the potential to be a disaster. That, more than anything, needs to be the focal point of the offseason. Hopefully getting some competent defensive players will bolster the special teams as well.

Duckett is a small back hiding in a big backs body. He tip toes too much and doesn't run with authority. That's why ATL ended up souring on him. He's kind of like Ron Dayne in the sense that they are both bigger guys who were tried out in short yardage roles and failed miserably.

I'd rather have Ryan Moats than TJ Duckett to be honest.

i really wouldn't even care if we went into the season with the backs we have right now cause if we do re sign stallworth i think our offense personal is fine as it is....its the philosophy. its the fact that although we started to run more when mcnabb went down we STILL didnt run enough. we won the giants game but there were also some retarded pass plays in that game where we should have been running. and the fact that our playcalling reverted in the NO game only scares me further into thinking that when mcnabb is back healthy we are going to go completely back to pass, pass, and play action pass. what diff does it make when u get a big back when we dont wanna run? to be honest i think westbrook and or buckhalter can get the 3rd and 1s its just that we dont stick with the run enough. if its 2nd and 1 we might run and if we get stuffed you can forget about another run play on 3rd and short.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Quasimoto on January 17, 2007, 05:56:20 PM
Whats the deal with Ryan Moats anyway?  Is he even going to be back next season?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on January 17, 2007, 05:56:35 PM
Quote from: FFatPatt on January 17, 2007, 05:53:34 PM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on January 17, 2007, 05:52:30 PM
I'd rather have Ryan Moats than TJ Duckett to be honest.

That's utterly stupid.  Stop it.

No, I'm serious. Duckett is trash. He was trash in ATL and I didn't want him when the masses were clamoring for him when it became obvious his time in ATL was up. He's a steaming pile of crap.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on January 17, 2007, 06:00:17 PM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on January 17, 2007, 05:56:35 PM
Quote from: FFatPatt on January 17, 2007, 05:53:34 PM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on January 17, 2007, 05:52:30 PM
I'd rather have Ryan Moats than TJ Duckett to be honest.

That's utterly stupid.  Stop it.

No, I'm serious. Duckett is trash. He was trash in ATL and I didn't want him when the masses were clamoring for him when it became obvious his time in ATL was up. He's a steaming pile of crap.

If Duckett is trash, then Moats is the half-digested feces of the goat that ate the trash.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Quasimoto on January 17, 2007, 06:00:55 PM
You seen what Duckett did to Biggie right?

(http://images.nfl.com/images/players/60x80/302187.jpg)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on January 17, 2007, 06:08:51 PM
Quote from: FFatPatt on January 17, 2007, 06:00:17 PM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on January 17, 2007, 05:56:35 PM
Quote from: FFatPatt on January 17, 2007, 05:53:34 PM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on January 17, 2007, 05:52:30 PM
I'd rather have Ryan Moats than TJ Duckett to be honest.

That's utterly stupid.  Stop it.

No, I'm serious. Duckett is trash. He was trash in ATL and I didn't want him when the masses were clamoring for him when it became obvious his time in ATL was up. He's a steaming pile of crap.

If Duckett is trash, then Moats is the half-digested feces of the goat that ate the trash.

Moats can be a lumpy mound of elephant poo for all I care. But I'd take that poo over TJ Duckett.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 17, 2007, 07:12:58 PM
gonna be a long offseason when less than 100 hours after the NO loss we are arguing whos better tj duckett or ryan moats
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: bobbyinlondon on January 17, 2007, 07:55:28 PM
Duckett is a FA--supposedly, the Skins traded for him because they were afraid the Eagles were going to get him.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Eaglez on January 17, 2007, 08:08:23 PM
He has been silent in Washington, I agree. He might not be the answer, but he is 6'0 250 pounds. If anything, since he did not get much PT last/this year, and he will probably be cut (even the taterskins would be stupid to keep him around for a ton of cash) I would at least entertain bringing him in and see what happens in camp. I wouldn't mind one of those '1 year deals show us what you got' type contracts. Maybe push Buck (assuming he's back) and at least add some talent to compete for roster spots in training camp.

If he doesn't pan out, fine. And maybe he won't. But I'd at least make some sort of effort of getting a bigger bodied back in here to pick up some tough yards. And right now I can't think of any other bigger backs that would hit the market this year.

However, with the reluctancy to run for short yardage when you have two cracks at picking up a yard might never change -- so bringing in a big back might be a moot point.

What is probably the most disheartening is that the Eagles have demonstrated during the win streak their ability and their commitment towards running and picking up short, tough yards. But I think I would be deluding myself to pretend that they will run the ball consistently in short yardage situations next year.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MDS on January 17, 2007, 08:22:14 PM
Westbrook
Duckett
Buckhalter

Good enough. Money, outside of Stallworth, should be spent revamping the defense. Which sucks.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on January 17, 2007, 08:37:48 PM
Quote from: MDS on January 17, 2007, 08:22:14 PM
Westbrook
Duckett
Buckhalter

Good enough. Money, outside of Stallworth, should be spent revamping the defense. Which sucks.

Word to Big Bird.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: mussa on January 17, 2007, 08:46:52 PM
Seriously, if they don't re-sign Stallworth they are making a huge huge huge mistake.  What go with a 3 yr guy, and basically two rookies as our starting 3 receivers in a pass happy offense. Hmmm. Thats almost as logical as not establishing a running game.  Hmm I'm starting to see a trend.  They cannot be that stupid.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Northern Eagle on January 17, 2007, 09:04:45 PM
Instead of Duckett.. I want Michael Turner. He's a FA this year isn't he? He would be the PERFECT compliment to BWEST and he can also get the tough yards.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: mussa on January 17, 2007, 09:25:50 PM
Mike Turner is a stud. I would be willing to give lots for a young, tough, fast, bruising back, who can return kicks also. Imagine a one two punch of Westbrook and M. Turner.  Of course woud be willing to pay more for a new coach who runs the ball also.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on January 17, 2007, 09:31:27 PM
If Duckett is a wet dream, then Turner is a real live threesome with Angelina and Jessica taking turns begging for more as they lap each other up and down..
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Geowhizzer on January 17, 2007, 09:47:21 PM
Quote from: Northern Eagle on January 17, 2007, 09:04:45 PM
Instead of Duckett.. I want Michael Turner. He's a FA this year isn't he? He would be the PERFECT compliment to BWEST and he can also get the tough yards.

According to footballsfuture.com, he is:

QuoteMichael Turner, RFA, San Diego Chargers
Turner takes a beating and keeps going. Turner isn't well known to the general public, but the kid has talent. He gets a handful of carries behind Ladainian Tomlinson and has maximized those carries, averaging six yards per carry in his short career. He carried just 80 times this season, but it was a career high for Turner, and he was still able to crack the 500 yard-mark with a pair of touchdowns. With his strong running style and production in San Diego this season, it shouldn't surprise anyone to see Turner sign elsewhere—but the Chargers may look to keep their dangerous rushing combo together.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Drunkmasterflex on January 17, 2007, 10:01:04 PM
He is a RFA.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on January 17, 2007, 10:19:43 PM
He's worth a second without a doubt.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Magical_Retard on January 17, 2007, 10:59:55 PM
again there is no point if we wont run, so unless they are committed to rushing their RBs, in any combination, at least 30 times a game it doesn't matter who we get and we might as well stick with the cheap buck.

more so than the offense, i want our ST and D to improve. and by improve i mean like score a TD here and there on ST and stop the run be a feared D.

speaking of our defense and our philosophy of not worrying so much about the rush yds vs the big play, i particularly do not disagree with the philosophy but when you mention that publicly and tell your players as much I think it does affect how they view a bad performance vs the rush. its almost like there is no accountability for the Ds inability to stop the run, and if someone brings it up its a automatic "well thats not what we are worried about". considering the cap space we have we should be able to have a D that can both shut down the run and pass, but sadly we can not even shut down the pass as predominately as we once could.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on January 17, 2007, 11:11:16 PM
I don't get the obsession with Michael Turner. Sure he is a nice player, but people are willing to give up draft picks for him, on a team that doesn't like to run the ball, and for a guy who would be second fiddle to Westbrook. Almost every offseason resource we have needs to be spent on fixing the defense.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Northern Eagle on January 17, 2007, 11:17:13 PM
Quote from: King Cole on January 17, 2007, 11:11:16 PM
I don't get the obsession with Michael Turner. Sure he is a nice player, but people are willing to give up draft picks for him, on a team that doesn't like to run the ball, and for a guy who would be second fiddle to Westbrook. Almost every offseason resource we have needs to be spent on fixing the defense.
Well considering what they have gotten latly out of the draft...... yes.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on January 17, 2007, 11:25:24 PM
Quote from: King Cole on January 17, 2007, 11:11:16 PM
I don't get the obsession with Michael Turner. Sure he is a nice player, but people are willing to give up draft picks for him, on a team that doesn't like to run the ball, and for a guy who would be second fiddle to Westbrook. Almost every offseason resource we have needs to be spent on fixing the defense.

While I agree about the defense, bringing Michael Turner in would give me a rager the likes of which have not been seen since Briana Loves Jenna.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: mussa on January 17, 2007, 11:47:34 PM
Well the real problem is clear. The coaches are not taking advantage of the players on this team.  They want a big play offense, yet do not have receivers or a QB who can do it effectively and consistently.  They strives to stop the pass, yet our D-line and DB's have performed much the same as the WR and QB, inconsistent.  Not only do they not take advantage of their players, but their schemes are proven schemes that rarely succeed in NFL history.

This team showed great promise torwards the end of the regular season.  They ran the ball, effectively, due to calling more run plays and also catching teams of guard by running so much.  The run opened up time for Garcia and took pressure off him.  The run more importantly gave us control of the clock and gave our small defense much needed time to be fresh. When our D is fresh, they excel. Look at the turnovers and pressure we got in those last few games.

Its so fargin simple its elementary.  We have the players to ground and pound, yet we continue to try to be a team that in NFL history does not succeed.

I rest my case and I find the defendant Andy Reid and Co. guilty of neglect.  Punishable by firing. Pack your bags and go to Canada or Europe.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MDS on January 18, 2007, 12:18:00 AM
Quote from: rjs246 on January 17, 2007, 11:25:24 PM
Quote from: King Cole on January 17, 2007, 11:11:16 PM
I don't get the obsession with Michael Turner. Sure he is a nice player, but people are willing to give up draft picks for him, on a team that doesn't like to run the ball, and for a guy who would be second fiddle to Westbrook. Almost every offseason resource we have needs to be spent on fixing the defense.

While I agree about the defense, bringing Michael Turner in would give me a rager the likes of which have not been seen since Briana Loves Jenna.

I love all the boner references. Keep them coming.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Philly_Crew on January 18, 2007, 07:49:55 AM
Although Duckett has the size, he has never really been the most effective short yardage back.  Almost like Ron Dayne, he is slow to the hole.  The #1 offseason priority is re-signing Stallworth,  IMO.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on January 18, 2007, 08:42:28 AM
Quote from: Philly_Crew on January 18, 2007, 07:49:55 AM
Although Duckett has the size, he has never really been the most effective short yardage back.  Almost like Ron Dayne, he is slow to the hole. 

Duckett's second year in the league he scored 11 TDs and didn't have a single run for negative yards.

In other words, everything you just said about him is inaccurate.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on January 18, 2007, 10:01:18 AM
Paul Domowich had a super stat last night on DNL...of the 16 picks the Eagles had from the '03 and '04 drafts, 3 players are still on the team. 

that's neat.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on January 18, 2007, 10:10:45 AM
It will be down to two after McDougle gets shown the door.

Tapeh & Andrews will be the only ones left from those two drafts.  Ouch.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on January 18, 2007, 10:14:00 AM
how is that not fireable on it's own
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 18, 2007, 10:17:59 AM
i made a post on the board a while back that i dont feel like looking for about how unbelievably awful the defensive drafts have been since 02 (lito sheldon lewis)...its mind boggling how inept theyve been and its all catching up to them now

the defense is minimum three years away from being saved and its gonna get worse before it gets better
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on January 18, 2007, 10:21:40 AM
Quote from: SunMo on January 18, 2007, 10:14:00 AM
how is that not fireable on it's own

They've done just enough to remain competitive in a historically awful division that is crammed with teams who are even more clueless than they are personnel-wise.

(Edited - historically awful during the past seven seasons - obviously not before that).   :)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on January 18, 2007, 10:22:29 AM
oh yeah...
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on January 18, 2007, 10:29:36 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 18, 2007, 10:17:59 AM
i made a post on the board a while back that i dont feel like looking for about how unbelievably awful the defensive drafts have been since 02 (lito sheldon lewis)...its mind boggling how inept theyve been and its all catching up to them now

the defense is minimum three years away from being saved and its gonna get worse before it gets better


Look at the starting defensive 11 at the beginning of the year.

1. Kearse - FA - Bust
2. Walker - Street FA - He'd be a decent backup, though.
3. Patterson - Draft - Disappointment
4. Howard - FA - Bust
5. McCoy - Draft - Replaced By Gaither/Decent Player
6. Trotter - Draft (Pre Andy)
7. Jones - FA - Awful
8. Sheldon - Draft - Solid Starter
9. Dawkins - Draft (Pre Andy) - Gawd
10. Lewis - Draft - Replaced By Considine Who Also Sucks
11. Lito - Draft - Legitimate Pro Bowler

Lito & Sheldon are the only two defensive starters selected by this regime who remain viable starters.  The rest are either free agent mistakes or in Patterson's (And Cole's, BTW) case being played way too many snaps to be effective.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 18, 2007, 10:30:02 AM
how is that not fireable on it's own

because right now the eagles have their own little old boys network in which there is no accountability...lurie and banner want people to stay with them and if you abide by that and take their offer you will be rewarded with the ultimate job security

jj taking their offer to stay as DC instead of going after the rams (and other) HC jobs

heckert taking the offer to stay here as...as....as whatever his position is instead of going for a GM job elsewhere

its much the same as they treat free agency...they will offer you right out the shoot...if you accept it youre in the club (kearse) if you dont and look to better your deal youre out (bently)

this is also why they love extending players who dont need to be extended....patterson for example...banner and lurie love to be loved and if you show them that you get rewarded...if you dont you get benched (lewis, hood)

another example is the fans....when the fans or media criticze the team look at how banner reacts...youre lucky you even have a team now shut up....ive never seen a person like banner (and probably lurie) who so need to be loved and accpeted and if they arent they get mean
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Wingspan on January 18, 2007, 10:38:59 AM
Quote from: SunMo on January 18, 2007, 10:01:18 AM
Paul Domowich had a super stat last night on DNL...of the 16 picks the Eagles had from the '03 and '04 drafts, 3 players are still on the team. 

that's neat.

He's wrong. But..

In a slight defense of those drafts...the eagles were good teams, and had depth, going into them. and while 3 are only left on the team. 11.5 of those 16 players...  are still playing (the .5 being Bruce Perry)

Shawn Andrews
Matt Ware - Arizona
J.R. Reed    - Atlanta
Trey Darilek - Miami
Thomas Tapeh
Andy Hall
Dexter Wynn - Houston
Adrien Clarke
Bruce Perry - Sorta Philly
Dominic Furio
Jerome McDougle
L.J. Smith
Billy McMullen    - Minnesota
Jamaal Green
Jeremy Bridges - Carolina
Norman Lejeune - Miami
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on January 18, 2007, 10:41:07 AM
so 4 of 16 instead of 3, that's still awful.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhanInDC on January 18, 2007, 01:46:24 PM
Quote from: Beef Rapp on January 17, 2007, 05:56:20 PM
Whats the deal with Ryan Moats anyway?  Is he even going to be back next season?

I think I found the perfect answer to this in Moats' newest blog on PE.com:

Quote
I'm just going to keep working. Work hard. Work harder. Get ready for training camp and mini-camps and just get ready for a battle.

I already know what I need to do. I haven't played that much, but I've taken that time to study and get ready. Every step of the way this whole year, there hasn't been too much time to sit around and not really do anything.

One of the people who has helped me the most is Coach Shuey. He basically figured out the way that I learn and tried to implement different teaching methods to teach me how to sustain the playbook and hold onto it in my mind and if I get to that point, I can just play football to my natural ability.

It's more of a visual thing when I learn. It's hard when you're not in there getting the visual. When you're looking at it on paper, it doesn't look the same in front of you. That's basically what I started doing with this scout-team stuff. That gave me the look I needed. I see what happens, that's what happens. We use that and sometimes visually through your mind out there on the field you can see it and store it.

I don't think my lack of playing time had anything to do with my knowledge of the playbook. I'm pretty good with it. I know everything in it now. I think I did well with the small playing time I had in the beginning of the year. That Jets game to end the preseason was pretty much my first preseason game. I didn't do great, but I did well. I picked up blitzes and ran the ball, all the things that they asked of me. I used to think the reason I wasn't playing was because of me. It's just the situation you're in and you have no control over it. You have two good backs in front of you and I just have to sit back and learn.

Of course, this season was frustrating. Before the season there was all of this talk of me and Westbrook in there at the same time doing all of these flip-flops in there. It was frustrating when I'd get one carry in a game and I ran the ball well on that one carry. Every game I'd hope for that one carry and knew I had to make the most of it. I thought I did pretty good on that one carry every game I played in.

I want to improve the blocking part of my game in the off-season. I always want to improve everywhere. I thought that for the most part, I picked up every blitz. In the Atlanta game, I picked up every blitz. I wouldn't say it was a problem, but maybe in the coaches' eyes it may be. But I can't read everybody's mind and I figured that out a long time ago. As far as myself, I thought I had it down pretty well.

Any running back would love to evolve into a better running back every year. Of course, I would want to evolve. Would I want to be like Brian Westbrook? I feel like we are totally different backs in a way. He does the catching part better than me, he's a better receiving back then I am, I'll admit that. He does excel at that part of the game. If you put him out wide, he's just as good as a wide receiver catching the ball. I'm more of a runner. I'm learning that part now, the catching part. The most I did in college was an out route, or a Texas route or a hitch.

I remember when I got here everyone was like Westbrook is awesome, but I had to see it for myself. So since I've been here, he's made me go 'wow' a few times.

I think my preseason injury set me back. I don't blame the coaches. They couldn't see me do anything, and I was hurt. I ran hard in preseason. On every run, I ran hard. I'm not going to look back and wish it could have been different, although I wish I never got hurt. It's all growing pains. Growing pains. I've been through a whole bunch before I even got here and it's not going to change. I'm sure Westbrook has too. He's showing people what he's made of.

The focus for me now is on getting stronger and getting back. I feel like I lost a little bit of my natural running ability. I need to get back to utilizing my instincts and tendencies more. You can't do that to a running back, put him in a military system and force him to run a way that he isn't comfortable with. Now, you don't want him to be a wild animal out there. You just have to be smart, finding the balance between the two.

That should just about sum it up. I know most football players aren't the sharpest pencils in the box, but Moats is D-U-M-B.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on January 18, 2007, 01:49:11 PM
Best third round pick ever. Definitely better than Duckett. Definitely.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Wingspan on January 18, 2007, 01:59:19 PM
nm
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 18, 2007, 02:09:08 PM
mcnabb was supposed to have his postseason press conference tomorrow...his first words since his injury....

andy just announced that he has cancelled it...said mcnabb doesnt have the time to speak to the media as he has to concentrate on his rehab
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on January 18, 2007, 02:39:43 PM
lol
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MDS on January 18, 2007, 02:55:45 PM
hes such a bitch
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 18, 2007, 02:59:39 PM
Quote from: MDS on January 18, 2007, 02:55:45 PM
hes such a bitch

Who, McNabb or Reid? (Or both?)
Regardless, I didn't really give two shteins to what he had to say. His interviews are never interesting.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 18, 2007, 03:00:32 PM
30 years old
cant face the heat
still gettin baby'ed by all around him

i wonder what mama mcnabbs blog will have to say about this
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 18, 2007, 03:09:19 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 18, 2007, 03:00:32 PM
i wonder what mama mcnabbs blog will have to say about this

Mama McNabb needs a heavy dose of bacon
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Event Horizon on January 18, 2007, 03:38:50 PM
You idiots get five games from a has-been QB and are ready to trash the franchise? So what he didn't speak to the dopes in Philly. Why should he speak to them? He's out for a freaking year. What was he supposed to say, "Ummm, yea guys. The stitches are healing well. I, uh, noticed a little puss over the last five weeks but that cleared up the other day. I don't expect to be able to run with the team even when I get healthy because they don't run with me so F it. By the way, how do you not go for the 4th and 14? Anyway, I'd like to introduce my new agent. Say hello to everyone, Drew."

Maybe you people would finally come around.

"Aaaaaaaaauuuuuuuu shiat, yall. Das mi boiiiii!"
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on January 18, 2007, 03:42:39 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 18, 2007, 02:09:08 PM
mcnabb was supposed to have his postseason press conference tomorrow...his first words since his injury....

andy just announced that he has cancelled it...said mcnabb doesnt have the time to speak to the media as he has to concentrate on his rehab

Awful.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: NGM on January 18, 2007, 03:57:49 PM
Quote from: FFatPatt on January 18, 2007, 03:42:39 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 18, 2007, 02:09:08 PM
mcnabb was supposed to have his postseason press conference tomorrow...his first words since his injury....

andy just announced that he has cancelled it...said mcnabb doesnt have the time to speak to the media as he has to concentrate on his rehab

Awful.

Ugh, shades of Lindross. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 18, 2007, 04:19:31 PM
You idiots get five games from a has-been QB and are ready to trash the franchise? So what he didn't speak to the dopes in Philly. Why should he speak to them? He's out for a freaking year. What was he supposed to say, "Ummm, yea guys. The stitches are healing well. I, uh, noticed a little puss over the last five weeks but that cleared up the other day. I don't expect to be able to run with the team even when I get healthy because they don't run with me so F it. By the way, how do you not go for the 4th and 14? Anyway, I'd like to introduce my new agent. Say hello to everyone, Drew."



(http://accboards.com/accboards/emoticons/tantrum.gif)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on January 18, 2007, 04:20:51 PM
Who cares about what McNabb is going to say. If there still was a press conference, he'd say as much during it as he is going to say now... which is nothing.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: mpmcgraw on January 18, 2007, 04:21:51 PM
Quote from: Event Horizon on January 18, 2007, 03:38:50 PM
You idiots get five games from a has-been QB and are ready to trash the franchise? So what he didn't speak to the dopes in Philly. Why should he speak to them? He's out for a freaking year. What was he supposed to say, "Ummm, yea guys. The stitches are healing well. I, uh, noticed a little puss over the last five weeks but that cleared up the other day. I don't expect to be able to run with the team even when I get healthy because they don't run with me so F it. By the way, how do you not go for the 4th and 14? Anyway, I'd like to introduce my new agent. Say hello to everyone, Drew."

Maybe you people would finally come around.

"Aaaaaaaaauuuuuuuu shiat, yall. Das mi boiiiii!"
C'mon they are not idiots.  Whining about meaningless stuff that has been beaten into the ground=fun!   
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 18, 2007, 04:31:23 PM
Whining about meaningless stuff

so says the man who studies something called VORP
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: mpmcgraw on January 18, 2007, 04:31:58 PM
Right, but I do not whine about it. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on January 18, 2007, 04:34:55 PM
you just worship it
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: mussa on January 18, 2007, 04:36:17 PM
Honestly does it matter if he speaks or not right now? He's prob going to goof off and tell jokes. Which obviously means he's a Hoyda and not hard enough. Thats why we havn't won the super bowl, cause McNabb is not gansta enough.  Garcia obviosuly has more gansta in him than McNabb. Just trade McNabb, Garcia is teh King.  Plus he's white. We all know black QB's suck.  Except Doug Williams. He won it all. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on January 18, 2007, 04:36:51 PM
Reid is on with Eskin.

"I wouldn't have changed anything I did during the game."
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on January 18, 2007, 04:38:32 PM
Wait, so for once.... he's NOT saying "I have to do a better job to put guys in position to make plays" or some shtein?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: mussa on January 18, 2007, 04:39:29 PM
Thats the truth, because Reid can't adjust and refuses to. This guy is living in his own world of mormon shtein.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on January 18, 2007, 04:42:09 PM
Quote from: King Cole on January 18, 2007, 04:36:51 PM
Reid is on with Eskin.

"I wouldn't have changed anything I did during the game."

Stab stab stab
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on January 18, 2007, 04:45:25 PM
Quote from: rjs246 on January 18, 2007, 04:42:09 PM
Stab stab stab

Your left eye, your right nut, and your dog all hate you now.  Except for your dog, who has gone on to doggie hell.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 18, 2007, 04:47:08 PM
hes even defending the 3rd and 1 to tapeh

and

HE DOESNT THINK THE D LINE NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on January 18, 2007, 04:47:17 PM
Eskin asked him if they need to fix the defensive line and he said basically:

"No, I think we have Bunkley coming in a year older, Kearse coming back, Patterson a year older, and if you add someone along the way then you add someone, but I'm confident in our guys."

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on January 18, 2007, 04:49:01 PM
I still wouldn't buy too much into what he says needs improvement. He said the same about the WRs then we went out and got TO.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Don Ho on January 18, 2007, 04:49:15 PM
Quote from: King Cole on January 18, 2007, 04:47:17 PM
Eskin asked him if they need to fix the defensive line and he said basically:

"No, I think we have Bunkley coming in a year older, Kearse coming back, Patterson a year older, and if you add someone along the way then you add someone, but I'm confident in our guys."



hear him now protecting dmac from the "stupid questions".

please.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 18, 2007, 04:51:14 PM
hes not allowing donovan to speak to the media because he (andy) is on with eskin now answering all the questions

he wants him to focus on his leg and he doesnt need to talk to anyone

amazing

i have to give it to eskin
for a eagle homer
he is really giving it to andy

making him sound foolish actually
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Don Ho on January 18, 2007, 04:52:26 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 18, 2007, 04:51:14 PM

i have to give it to eskin
for a eagle homer
he is really giving it to andy

making him sound foolish actually

for once i'm proud of the king.  i'm just waiting for AR to blow a fuse.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on January 18, 2007, 04:52:50 PM
"Dhani will be back."

Still wouldn't buy into it though.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on January 18, 2007, 04:53:11 PM
Quote from: Don Ho on January 18, 2007, 04:52:26 PM
i'm just waiting for AR to blow an artery.

yes
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Don Ho on January 18, 2007, 04:53:57 PM
shtein, just interview Jim Mora Jr. already.

hope king asks him what he would do if the BYU job opened up.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Don Ho on January 18, 2007, 04:54:43 PM
Quote from: King Cole on January 18, 2007, 04:52:50 PM
"Dhani will be back."

Still wouldn't buy into it though.

must find tall building
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 18, 2007, 04:55:08 PM
to his credit he would not defend the linebackers...did everything but criticize them

which says to me he really does think the DL is fine
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on January 18, 2007, 04:55:21 PM
He did say a "but offseasons are crazy so you never know what will happen" in there, so that is his out.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on January 18, 2007, 04:57:32 PM
Quote from: Don Ho on January 18, 2007, 04:53:57 PM
shtein, just interview Jim Mora Jr. already.

Um, no thanks.

Quote from: ice grillin you on January 18, 2007, 04:55:08 PM
to his credit he would not defend the linebackers...did everything but criticize them

which says to me he really does think the DL is fine

I don't even know what to say to that.  I'm baffled.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on January 18, 2007, 04:58:55 PM
I think he's really disappointed in Bunkley. Second time he mentioned that Bunkley didn't play as much as he wanted without being prompted on it.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Don Ho on January 18, 2007, 05:03:34 PM
Reno, adequate.  yeah baby.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 18, 2007, 05:04:58 PM
when asked about stallworth coming back reid answered...and this is an exact quote...

"it WAS nice having him here"

"he did a good job for us"
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Don Ho on January 18, 2007, 05:09:22 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 18, 2007, 05:04:58 PM
when asked about stallworth coming back reid answered...and this is an exact quote...

"it WAS nice having him here"

"he did a good job for us"

I'm headed out the door to the street to throw myself in front of a bus.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Don Ho on January 18, 2007, 05:11:13 PM
Eskin is just getting plain stupid now.  next.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MURP on January 18, 2007, 05:21:59 PM
TREASON!!!!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MDS on January 18, 2007, 05:54:43 PM
Seems to me Reid has a secret plan to bring back Todd Pinkston.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Event Horizon on January 18, 2007, 07:10:02 PM
Reid doesn't give much in press interviews because he doesn't have anything much to give in the first place. He doesn't have an answer to questions because he hasn't ever thought out the thing in the first place. He's a damn QB coach and nothing more. Lurie promoted him beyond his level of competence and even after eight years he hasn't learned to be a decent play caller. The poor handling of the press, the poor clock management, the poor play calling, the poor drafting are all a consequence of undue promotion. The fact that it's continued for eight years, and likely to continue for a few more, is the result of a mentally challenged coach and an Owner who is content to settle for a money maker- Lombardi be damned.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Magical_Retard on January 18, 2007, 07:43:03 PM
Quote from: Event Horizon on January 18, 2007, 07:10:02 PM
Reid doesn't give much in press interviews because he doesn't have anything much to give in the first place. He doesn't have an answer to questions because he hasn't ever thought out the thing in the first place. He's a damn QB coach and nothing more. Lurie promoted him beyond his level of competence and even after eight years he hasn't learned to be a decent play caller. The poor handling of the press, the poor clock management, the poor play calling, the poor drafting are all a consequence of undue promotion. The fact that it's continued for eight years, and likely to continue for a few more, is the result of a mentally challenged coach and an Owner who is content to settle for a money maker- Lombardi be damned.




hahah so a qb coach made so far as being the coach of a team that wins this many games? wow more teams should be hiring undeserving qb coaches then.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 18, 2007, 08:57:55 PM
ok this is my stance right now

if the interview is true to the way it sounded and reid is disgusted with the linebackers and overhauls them.....

meaning no gocong.....dhani is replaced with the best available FA sam

a middle linebacker preferably willis to replace trotter

and make an honest valid attempt to upgrade the wil

then im willing to take my chances with the exisiting DL coming back
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: mussa on January 18, 2007, 09:13:30 PM
Quote from: MDS on January 18, 2007, 05:54:43 PM
Seems to me Reid has a secret plan to bring back Todd Pinkston.

Thats genious! Dump Stallworth, sign Pinkston and Freddie at vet minimum. Deep threat and people's champ@!!! Huge cap! Mo Money for bust d-lineman and linebackers!!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on January 18, 2007, 10:08:42 PM
Quote from: MURP on January 18, 2007, 05:21:59 PM
TREASON!!

I have to say that I support MURP's simple, yet ckear abd forceful, stance on things.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Munson on January 18, 2007, 10:10:35 PM
Quote from: rjs246 on January 18, 2007, 10:08:42 PM
Quote from: MURP on January 18, 2007, 05:21:59 PM
TREASON!!

I have to say that I support MURP's simple, yet ckear abd forceful, stance on things.

Nice English. Douche. [/rjs out of jokes]
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Drunkmasterflex on January 18, 2007, 10:25:27 PM
"It was nice having him here." :fire
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Munson on January 18, 2007, 10:26:44 PM
Quote from: Drunkmasterflex on January 18, 2007, 10:25:27 PM
"It was nice having him here." :fire

Lets move Andy to DT and get a new head coach.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Drunkmasterflex on January 18, 2007, 10:28:59 PM
Let's REmove him from life.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Eagaholic on January 19, 2007, 01:06:51 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 18, 2007, 08:57:55 PM
ok this is my stance right now

if the interview is true to the way it sounded and reid is disgusted with the linebackers and overhauls them.....

meaning no gocong.....dhani is replaced with the best available FA sam

a middle linebacker preferably willis to replace trotter

and make an honest valid attempt to upgrade the wil

then im willing to take my chances with the exisiting DL coming back


Yes, but I would also like to see peace in the world and enough food for everybody to eat (come to think of it, the latter could be acomplished by shunting just 20% of AR's caloric intake to third world countries and Apalachia.)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on January 19, 2007, 08:22:53 AM
Hey Munson, how do my balls taste?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 19, 2007, 09:29:55 AM
Chocolate and salty would be my guess
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on January 19, 2007, 10:34:00 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 18, 2007, 04:51:14 PM
hes not allowing donovan to speak to the media because he (andy) is on with eskin now answering all the questions

he wants him to focus on his leg and he doesnt need to talk to anyone

amazing

They were talking about it this morning on WIP and both Jon Ritchie and Screamin' A. agreed that it was the right move because a player's mind is in a different state when rehabbing instead of concentrating on the team, and with the Philly media hitting him with all kinds of questions about Garcia, the team's success, Marty's playcalling, his mom's comments, his future here, etc., he could say things that will be used against him for the next 7 months.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 19, 2007, 10:43:48 AM
The first mistake he made was saying he'd have a PC in the first place. Nobody would care if he hadn't scheduled one.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on January 19, 2007, 10:49:56 AM
QuoteEagles | Reid happy with defensive line group heading into '07
Fri, 19 Jan 2007 06:51:56 -0800

Dave Spadaro, of PhiladelphiaEagles.com, reports Philadelphia Eagles head coach Andy Reid discussed the status of his defensive linemen heading into the 2007 season and was asked whether the club needed to improve the position during the offseason. "No. What I think you need to do is, Bunk (Brodrick Bunkley) needs to be a year older, and (Mike) Patterson will be a year old, (Trent) Cole will be a year older," Reid said. "You get Jevon Kearse back in the mix. If you add somebody in there, you add somebody in there. But those fellas, I think that's a pretty good unit when it's healthy."

QuoteEagles | Reid impressed with Patterson's consistency
Fri, 19 Jan 2007 07:31:50 -0800

Dave Spadaro, of PhiladelphiaEagles.com, reports Philadelphia Eagles head coach Andy Reid expressed his views regarding the 2006 performance of DL Mike Patterson. "He's doing a solid job, is what he is doing. And that is what he is. You're picking late in the first round and you get a good, solid football player. That's what Patterson is. He doesn't make a lot of mistakes, he holds his ground, he gives you a little bit of a pass rush, he's tough as nails and he is going to be there every Sunday."
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 19, 2007, 01:22:50 PM
those quotes are all taken directly from reids interview with eskin yesterday...spads took them from that and spun it into some fluffy blurbs


The first mistake he made was saying he'd have a PC in the first place. Nobody would care if he hadn't scheduled one.

exactly

its just sad that you have to hide your 30 year old eight year veteran qb from the meia because he might say something wrong or god forbid upsets donovan....its just pathetic and goes back to what ive always said about mcnabbs inner being...not exactly the qualities you want in a big game qb....its sad too cause the guy has all the physical tools youd ever want


Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MURP on January 19, 2007, 01:24:41 PM
Im still to pissed about 4th and 15 to care about McNabbs stupid press conference. 

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on January 19, 2007, 01:54:31 PM
im surprised how many media-types have defended it, in fact, they act like it was the only decision
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MURP on January 19, 2007, 01:58:09 PM
it was the only decision, if your bottom line was TREASON!!!!!!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: mussa on January 19, 2007, 01:58:29 PM
No reason to be pissed at just one play. Think 100's of others throughout the season. They keep flashing through my mind!   :boom  :boom :boom
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyandBCEagles on January 19, 2007, 01:59:13 PM
Season's over.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 19, 2007, 02:18:23 PM
i think the decision was so obviously bad that certain people wanted to rush and be the first one to defend....like dare to be different...

if theres a single person out there....including the people who now defend the call...whos jaw didnt drop when they saw the punt team out there after the commerical then they are a lying son of a bitch
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Quasimoto on January 19, 2007, 03:07:34 PM
What would you have done if Dirk Diggler had gone against Andy and tried to run it for the first only coming up a yard short?   :-D

I would have done that if I were Dirk. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Munson on January 19, 2007, 03:52:30 PM
Quote from: rjs246 on January 19, 2007, 08:22:53 AM
Hey Munson, how do my balls taste?

Schweaty.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MURP on January 19, 2007, 04:01:07 PM
Quote from: Beef Rapp on January 19, 2007, 03:07:34 PM
What would you have done if Dirk Diggler had gone against Andy and tried to run it for the first only coming up a yard short?   :-D

blamed Reid. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Quasimoto on January 19, 2007, 04:02:10 PM
Me too.

He's really fat. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Don Ho on January 19, 2007, 04:12:46 PM
Quote from: MURP on January 19, 2007, 01:24:41 PM
Im still to pissed about 4th and 15 to care about McNabbs stupid press conference. 



when do the "4th & 15" t-shirts go on sale?  My "4th & 26" is getting nasty.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on January 19, 2007, 04:13:16 PM
Quote from: Beef Rapp on January 19, 2007, 04:02:10 PM
Me too.

He's really fat. 

farging chain restaurants. . .   :boom
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: DH on January 19, 2007, 04:21:42 PM
I bet the Aussie punter would have punched Reid in the mouth if he was on the team last week.

Sign. Him. Now.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on January 20, 2007, 01:29:33 PM
PFT again

QuoteFEATHERS RUFFLE IN PHILLY OVER MCNABB REHAB

We've determined via conversations with multiple league and media sources that there has been, at some point in the not-too-distant past, a squabble in Philadelphia regarding the status of the rehab of quarterback Donovan McNabb's torn ACL.

As we hear it, McNabb was at some point determined to be behind schedule in his recovery from season-ending surgery to repair the injury that he suffered against the Titans.  And McNabb has, on at least one occasion, blamed the delay on well-respected trainer Rick Burkholder.

There's a school of thought that Eagles coach Andy Reid put the kibosh on McNabb's recent press conference due in part to concerns that McNabb would blab about the brouhaha.

Complicating matters is the fact that the players have a strong affinity for backup Jeff Garcia, who led the team to a berth in the divisional playoffs.  An industry source tells us that guys like tackle Jon Runyan and linebacker Jeremiah Trotter, both members of Reid's "veterans' committee" have expressed strong support for Garcia.

What the support translates into remains to be seen.  We think it's unlikely that McNabb will be traded.  But with Garcia soon to become a free agent, and a possible target for a starting job in, say, Minnesota, the Eagles will need to cough up the money to keep him around -- which would serve only to fuel the speculation that Garcia might have a shot at the job. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: shorebird on January 20, 2007, 01:50:48 PM
This is the start of a pile of shtein that only is going to get bigger.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Event Horizon on January 20, 2007, 02:24:54 PM
Why would McNabb want to be behind schedule? How would anyone know he was determined about not getting healthy? They catch him busting the stitches or something? "OMG, Rick! Get in here! Donny's busting the stitches again!"

Maybe they caught him doing the moon walk on shaggy carpet so something. How can you be behind in the rehab of a 8-12 month injury just a few months into it anyway? What would it serve him to miss more games than necessary? Complete crap. These guys must have an agenda which involves Garcia's nuts.

The idea that Garcia is going to take McNabb's job based on a handful of decent performances is delusional. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MDS on January 20, 2007, 02:37:04 PM
I wouldn't be shocked if Reid lets Garcia go just to take away any chances of creating a QB controversy.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 20, 2007, 03:08:47 PM
id be happy if no one here ever posted anything from pft again

its a worthless site that has as many nfl sources as i do
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on January 20, 2007, 03:15:38 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 20, 2007, 03:08:47 PM
id be happy if no one here ever posted anything from pft again

its a worthless site that has as many nfl sources as i do

Totally agree except for the "nfl sources" part.  I'm sure you have many more than they do.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on January 20, 2007, 03:55:38 PM
1 would be a lot more.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Geowhizzer on January 20, 2007, 04:19:17 PM
Quote from: Event Horizon on January 20, 2007, 02:24:54 PM
Why would McNabb want to be behind schedule? How would anyone know he was determined about not getting healthy? They catch him busting the stitches or something? "OMG, Rick! Get in here! Donny's busting the stitches again!"

Maybe they caught him doing the moon walk on shaggy carpet so something. How can you be behind in the rehab of a 8-12 month injury just a few months into it anyway? What would it serve him to miss more games than necessary? Complete crap. These guys must have an agenda which involves Garcia's nuts.

The idea that Garcia is going to take McNabb's job based on a handful of decent performances is delusional. 

I don't think that they meant that McNabb was determined to make himself behind schedule.

Rather, "it was determined" (i.e. the medical staff decided or discovered) that McNabb was behind schedule.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: mussa on January 20, 2007, 04:42:47 PM
McNabb > Garcia

Plain and simple.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on January 20, 2007, 06:25:19 PM
PFT.com hits a high % of their stories. I wouldn't discount this, althouhg it seems to be more speculation than anything.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Don Ho on January 21, 2007, 02:51:36 AM
god help us, it's going to be a long, long off season.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: shorebird on January 21, 2007, 07:50:11 AM
Quote from: Don Ho on January 21, 2007, 02:51:36 AM
god help us, it's going to be a long, long off season.

You ain't kiddin'. We will hear a lot more about this crap before it's all over. In other words, there will be plenty of hacks out there that will stir the pot of shtein.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Magical_Retard on January 21, 2007, 11:22:03 AM
but wait i thought we were trading mcnabb to minn for a 2nd round pick and garcia was pick of the future!????!!???
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: General_Failure on January 21, 2007, 11:33:58 AM
Baskett's got a long way to go to make up those 16 catches Stallworth had over him.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Geowhizzer on January 21, 2007, 01:22:46 PM
Quote from: General_Failure on January 21, 2007, 11:33:58 AM
Baskett's got a long way to go to make up those 16 catches Stallworth had over him.

This is what was going through in my mind.  Stallworth is a great deep threat, but he was hurt a lot last year, and with an injury that never quite seemed to heal.

Now, depending on how much money he's looking for (or can get from other teams), of course I want him back.  But to say that it should be done now, whatever the cost, may be a bit presumptuous.

Here's Stallworth's stats this year:  38 catches, 725 yards, 19.1 average, 5 TD
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 21, 2007, 02:27:35 PM
stallworth opens up the field for everyone else...especially underneath...something that no one else on this team much less friggin hank baskett or avant can do...he also is a bonafied nfl threat...a guy that will command a safety to look closely at his side of the field...where as every other wide receiver on this team get a single corner on them and lets play ball

stats dont tell the whole story on a guy like stallworth

stallworth also is very underrated as a posession receiver..he come over the middle on those quick slants better than anyone on the team
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Eaglez on January 21, 2007, 03:25:02 PM
Stallworth commands attention. Baskett and Avant not so much.

If Stallworth is matched up one on one on the outside he is probably going to beat the corner a good percentage of the time and get excellent separation. A threat like that is essential for any team -- whether they are committed to the run or are pass happy like the Eagles.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on January 21, 2007, 04:00:54 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 21, 2007, 02:27:35 PM
stallworth opens up the field for everyone else...especially underneath...something that no one else on this team much less friggin hank baskett or avant can do...he also is a bonafied nfl threat...a guy that will command a safety to look closely at his side of the field...where as every other wide receiver on this team get a single corner on them and lets play ball

stats dont tell the whole story on a guy like stallworth

stallworth also is very underrated as a posession receiver..he come over the middle on those quick slants better than anyone on the team

Stop making sense right now.  Stop it.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Geowhizzer on January 21, 2007, 04:38:58 PM
[devil's advocate]When he's on the field.[/devil's advocate]
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MDS on January 21, 2007, 06:08:03 PM
If anyone cares:

QuoteThe Eagles won't win the Super Bowl this year, but they can take solace in the fact that they are the television ratings champions.

According to the Eagles' public relations department, during the regular season, an average of 892,000 households watched the weekly Eagles games — twice the NFL average of 446,000 households. The highest-rated, regular-season games were Week 5 vs. Dallas (1.168 million) and Week 17 vs. Atlanta (1.058 million).

The Eagles' average rating of 30.4 is 19 percent above the NFL average among all markets. Chicago is the other market with comparable ratings. Chicago averaged a 55 share, and the Eagles averaged a 54 share.

More than one million households in the Philadelphia TV market watched the Eagles' playoff games against the Giants and Saints. The Saints game earned a 42.0 rating/63 share, and the Giants game earned a 44.2 rating/63 share.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Drunkmasterflex on January 21, 2007, 07:10:13 PM
NFL Gold Standard! :puke
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 21, 2007, 08:19:33 PM
[devil's advocate]When he's on the field.[/devil's advocate]

fair enough but hes not someone like mcnabb or even westbrook

stallworth has missed four games in the last three years
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyandBCEagles on January 21, 2007, 08:23:40 PM
Kiwanuka lived downstairs from me last year.  I think that gives me as much NFL insight as PFT.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Geowhizzer on January 21, 2007, 08:39:40 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 21, 2007, 08:19:33 PM
[devil's advocate]When he's on the field.[/devil's advocate]

fair enough but hes not someone like mcnabb or even westbrook

stallworth has missed four games in the last three years

Like I said, just playing a bit of Devil's advocate.  I want him resigned as badly as everyone else on here.

I would like to see him used a bit more next year, though - 38 catches in 12 games is insufficient for someone of his speed and talent.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on January 21, 2007, 09:56:02 PM
Quote from: Geowhizzer on January 21, 2007, 08:39:40 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 21, 2007, 08:19:33 PM
[devil's advocate]When he's on the field.[/devil's advocate]

fair enough but hes not someone like mcnabb or even westbrook

stallworth has missed four games in the last three years

Like I said, just playing a bit of Devil's advocate.  I want him resigned as badly as everyone else on here.

I would like to see him used a bit more next year, though - 38 catches in 12 games is insufficient for someone of his speed and talent.

Give me 12 games of Donte Stallworth (if he misses any) over 16 games of Drew Bennett or some other FA scrub anyday.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 21, 2007, 09:59:34 PM
i love how right when stallworth is about to hit free agency hes all of a sudden the most injury prone player in the history of the nfl.....mcnabb is way more fragile than stallworth
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: General_Failure on January 21, 2007, 10:00:13 PM
I don't think McNabb's missed a game because of a sore hamstring.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Eaglez on January 21, 2007, 10:05:12 PM
No, but he has missed substantial portions of a season for running to the sidelines untouched and blowing out his knee.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 21, 2007, 10:06:04 PM
no he gets holes in his stomach with intestines coming out...blown knees and broken legs

ill take a sore hammy that causes a player to miss four games in three years over that
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: General_Failure on January 21, 2007, 10:06:18 PM
Buck does that every other year, and he managed to survive this season somehow.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Geowhizzer on January 22, 2007, 05:59:01 AM
Quote from: EagleFeva on January 21, 2007, 09:56:02 PM
Quote from: Geowhizzer on January 21, 2007, 08:39:40 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 21, 2007, 08:19:33 PM
[devil's advocate]When he's on the field.[/devil's advocate]

fair enough but hes not someone like mcnabb or even westbrook

stallworth has missed four games in the last three years

Like I said, just playing a bit of Devil's advocate.  I want him resigned as badly as everyone else on here.

I would like to see him used a bit more next year, though - 38 catches in 12 games is insufficient for someone of his speed and talent.

Give me 12 games of Donte Stallworth (if he misses any) over 16 games of Drew Bennett or some other FA scrub anyday.

Quote from: ice grillin you on January 21, 2007, 09:59:34 PM
i love how right when stallworth is about to hit free agency hes all of a sudden the most injury prone player in the history of the nfl.....mcnabb is way more fragile than stallworth

Re-read my post again.

The point wasn't the 12 games.  The point was 38 total catches in those 12 games.

Note that I said I would like to see him used a bit more.  More as a receiver and less as that "decoy" people keep talking about.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on January 22, 2007, 10:02:27 AM
Eckel was on WIP trying to rile people up again, saying McNabb is pissed because he wanted to travel to New Orleans and the Eagles wouldn't let him, and out of nowhere he speculates that McNabb doesn't want to be here anymore.   ::)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on January 22, 2007, 10:13:17 AM
I'm shocked that Eckel is saying that. Shocked!

Perhaps he was pissed. Maybe thats why Andy put the kill on the PC rather than what PFT thought. But they take a fat cap hit to trade/cut him. Back to your hole, Eckel.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 22, 2007, 11:00:12 AM
if they can get a nice young qb in the draft and garcia back im all for mcnabb leaving...hes run his course here and its about time he goes...he and reid will never ever win a superbowl so whats the point...the problem in getting rid of him is his albatross of a contract
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on January 22, 2007, 11:02:54 AM
the cap hit is only 3.8 million this year, and nothing next year, that's per Eckel


but please, it's not happening.  nor should it.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Mad-Lad on January 22, 2007, 11:03:38 AM
After watching yesterdays Bears/Saints game, i'm even more convinced that the Eagles front seven sucks.  Screw worrying about McNabb, Stallworth, and the rest of the offense.  How about a defense that will hit someone in the mouth?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 22, 2007, 11:04:56 AM
i mean im not promoting it...and if hes back then thats fine...but unlike a couple years ago if he went now it would be perfectly fine with me...him and his family are straight drama queens
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on January 22, 2007, 11:21:12 AM
Spads:

QuoteWell, Mark doesn't cover the Eagles any longer, so I will be interested to see how much of what he says this off-season comes true. Anybody going to keep track of that?


1. Trotter will be back
2. Donovan and Jevon and Lito didn't travel to New Orleans, so ... If Donovan has a problem with that, I don't know of it.
3. Reid spoke with Donovan. I know that for a fact.


Any other rumors?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Cerevant on January 22, 2007, 11:41:49 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 22, 2007, 11:04:56 AM
i mean im not promoting it...and if hes back then thats fine...but unlike a couple years ago if he went now it would be perfectly fine with me...him and his family are straight drama queens
agree.
Eric. Lindros.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Quasimoto on January 22, 2007, 12:35:40 PM
Man this city is full of drama queen's.   I'm getting really tired of all the bullshtein that surrounds McNabb and Reid.  It's so draining!  :-o
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Magical_Retard on January 22, 2007, 05:07:36 PM
these rumors are a joke. not that we will but if we do lose mcnabb i would be pissed. that would be a joke. he is the best QB we have had in ages and just cause some radio jocks and fishmongers and fans who think they know him inside out and his mental psyche think he does not have it in him to win does not mean he can not win.

if we had run the offense all season like we ran it with garcia we could be playing in 2 weeks in the superbowl. he was on his way to a MVP season.

and please the Lindros and McNabb comparisons are a joke. Lindros and Clarke did not get along. McNabb and Reid and the rest of the FO are in love with each other. and for whatever his mom says here and there it is in no way equal to the Lindros crap.

i really do not get how McNabb of all ppl gets so much crap not just from eagles fans but ppl all over the NFL.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on January 22, 2007, 11:27:15 PM
For anyone that collects those McFarlane figures, they're releasing a Reggie White one in August and a Westbook one in September.  No pics yet...

(FYI, other Philadelphia sports ones released this year:

Steve Carlton in February
3" Pat Burrell in February
Ryan Howard in May
Moses Malone in September
Simon Gagne in October)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on January 22, 2007, 11:37:37 PM
Was the Burrell one of him swinging and missing or him doing his patented 'Burrell shuffle' where he jumps out of the way of a juicy fastball on the inside corner?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Eaglez on January 22, 2007, 11:38:54 PM
Ha. Funny that they are releasing a Burrell figure before Howard. Funnier that they are releasing a Burrell figure at all.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on January 22, 2007, 11:42:04 PM
Here's Burrell's 2003 figure (http://www.spawn.com/toys/baseball/mlb5/pburrell/images/mlb5_pburrell_photo_01_dp.jpg)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on January 22, 2007, 11:46:24 PM
That's about right. Head pulled out. They should have the catcher with the ball in his mitt to drive home the point.

i can almost hear Billy Beane's automatic Burrell defense pager going off. We'll see him soon in this thread.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Eaglez on January 22, 2007, 11:48:53 PM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on January 22, 2007, 11:46:24 PM
That's about right. Head pulled out. They should have the catcher with the ball in his mitt to drive home the point.

i can almost hear Billy Beane's automatic Burrell defense pager going off. We'll see him soon in this thread.

:-D I was thinking more along the lines of a baseball being superimposed about belt high on that image.

Almost Pat! Keep on keepin' on!

I'd just figure Billy would get a ragin' VORP when Burrell needed a fair defense. I didn't know he had a beeper.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on January 22, 2007, 11:57:04 PM
Here's the Carlton one: 1 (http://www.spawn.com/toys/baseball/cooperstown4/scarlton/images/cooperstown4_scarlton_photo_01_dp.jpg) 2 (http://www.spawn.com/toys/baseball/cooperstown4/scarlton/images/cooperstown4_scarlton_photo_02_dp.jpg)

OK, back on topic with the whining about the defense and the front office...
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Eaglez on January 22, 2007, 11:59:26 PM
Stallworth's gone... (that's another thread).

Oh yeah, the FO will do nothing to sure up the front 7 for next season. Go...

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on January 23, 2007, 09:09:51 AM
Quote from: BigEd76 on January 22, 2007, 11:57:04 PM
Here's the Carlton one: 1 (http://www.spawn.com/toys/baseball/cooperstown4/scarlton/images/cooperstown4_scarlton_photo_01_dp.jpg) 2 (http://www.spawn.com/toys/baseball/cooperstown4/scarlton/images/cooperstown4_scarlton_photo_02_dp.jpg)

That Carlton joint is money and it will be off the heezy sitting next to my Schmidt joint. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on January 23, 2007, 09:15:48 AM
Quote from: Sgt PSN on January 23, 2007, 09:09:51 AM
That Carlton joint is money and it will be off the heezy sitting next to my Schmidt joint. 

???
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on January 23, 2007, 10:18:58 AM
A-hole Eckel decided his McNabb theory required an article (http://www.nj.com/columns/times/eckel/index.ssf?/base/columns-0/116952879274120.xml&coll=5&thispage=1)

...and now ESPN has picked up on it (http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2739967)

Damnit
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on January 23, 2007, 10:21:00 AM
I don't care either way.  Blow it up.  The "window" is closed at this point anyway.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: hunt on January 23, 2007, 10:36:11 AM
Quote from: Sgt PSN on January 23, 2007, 09:09:51 AM
Quote from: BigEd76 on January 22, 2007, 11:57:04 PM
Here's the Carlton one: 1 (http://www.spawn.com/toys/baseball/cooperstown4/scarlton/images/cooperstown4_scarlton_photo_01_dp.jpg) 2 (http://www.spawn.com/toys/baseball/cooperstown4/scarlton/images/cooperstown4_scarlton_photo_02_dp.jpg)

That Carlton joint is money and it will be off the heezy sitting next to my Schmidt joint. 

they should make a dirk johnson...johnson.  :paranoid
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Eaglez on January 23, 2007, 10:50:36 AM
If McNabb is mad about not being able to travel with the team, he shouldn't be. If anything, after the whole debacle with TO, you would think McNabb would have respect for team rules and policy. Players on IR don't travel with the team. Period.

Excuse me if I don't jump all over an article by Eckel predicting the demise of McNabb. If it was from a more credible source, maybe I'd think there is a shred of truth in there. But right now the article is questionable in its accuracies to me.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 23, 2007, 10:59:14 AM
we dont need an article from eckel to know that mcnabb is a little bitch
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Quasimoto on January 23, 2007, 11:56:28 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 23, 2007, 10:59:14 AM
we dont need an article from eckel to know that mcnabb is a little bitch

Is he going to get mommy to go and talk to Eckel about his article?   :-D
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on January 23, 2007, 01:13:21 PM
GCobb and Hugh pretty much pissed all over Rhea and Angelo this morning and it was great. G got on there and basically told them to get off Garcia's nuts because dude is about to be 37, has a weak arm and who knows if he'll ever do what he did again.

I would like to see Eckel go cover some other team. Is there an opening in Buffalo? He'd let that FO run a train on his ass he loves 'em so much.

Get out of town, Mark. You suck.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Quasimoto on January 23, 2007, 01:16:03 PM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on January 23, 2007, 01:13:21 PM
I would like to see Eckel go cover some other team. Is there an opening in Buffalo? He'd let that FO run a train on his ass he loves 'em so much.

:puke
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 23, 2007, 01:17:18 PM
yeah if you wanna pummel mcnabb theres a lot of places he deserves it....but i dont understand the people who act as tho garcia is some sort of savoir...hes a great back up...period...

if he somehow flips the season he just had into a starting job with nice money then there are some really dumb people in the nfl
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on January 23, 2007, 01:21:41 PM
Garcia is adored because he's a nutzo on the field and screams and gets dirty. Its the Philly way. Sometimes fans will like a guy if he's a dirtball more than if he's a good player. I don't understand that sometimes.

And the Eagles are in a bad spot here either way. If Garcia gets big money and rolls, they will face heat for letting him walk. It'll be portrayed by the ilk of Cataldi and Eckel that they let him go on purpose because they wanted no controversey. If he's back we'll be back to the days of people throwing water bottles at McNabb's head as he walks off the field.

My take is this;

If Garcia wants to come back under the vet min with an incentive laden deal, cool. That way he's rewarded if he has to start again. And if he's just being the backup he's paid as such.

But if he leaves because a team throws money at him, Feeley is the #2 and they draft a kid.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Eaglez on January 23, 2007, 01:33:59 PM
True, it is not like the Eagles don't have options. Feeley knows the system pretty much as well as Garcia does and has a stronger arm. The only tradeoff being that Garcia is more mobile and arguably makes better decisions with the ball because of his experience.

Would I like Garcia back? Sure, I think his presence helps the locker room too because a lot of players have great things to say about him. But there is no reason to overpay for him when there are other areas of need and the Eagles have a capable backup in Feeley.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 23, 2007, 01:34:55 PM
Garcia is adored because he's a nutzo on the field and screams and gets dirty. Its the Philly way. Sometimes fans will like a guy if he's a dirtball more than if he's a good player. I don't understand that sometimes.

i dont know how you dont understand that...if mcnabb had one ounce of the fire garcia had hed be a much better player...mcnabbs biggest problem is not talent...its confidence and the lack of ability to not get down during tough times...also his desire to not lose is absent...these are all things garcia has tons of and if mcnabb had them hed be a much better player...maybe the kind of player that could win it all or at least a couple nfc championships
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on January 23, 2007, 01:36:46 PM
I can't imagine Andy wouldn't be comfortable with A.J. as the backup.  It all hinges on whether Donovan is healthy enough to start the season.

I don't think he will be nor do I think they go into the season with A.J. as the starter, though.  They'd be flat-out nuts if they did that.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on January 23, 2007, 01:41:49 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 23, 2007, 01:34:55 PM
Garcia is adored because he's a nutzo on the field and screams and gets dirty. Its the Philly way. Sometimes fans will like a guy if he's a dirtball more than if he's a good player. I don't understand that sometimes.

i dont know how you dont understand that...if mcnabb had one ounce of the fire garcia had hed be a much better player...mcnabbs biggest problem is not talent...its confidence and the lack of ability to not get down during tough times...also his desire to not lose is absent...these are all things garcia has tons of and if mcnabb had them hed be a much better player...maybe the kind of player that could win it all or at least a couple nfc championships

Player A: average player who has a lot of heart, speaks out and is viewed as an underdog

Player B: very good player who has heart but doesn't show his emotions openly

I believe that most people in the city would take player A and I don't get it. Listen, I loved Buddy Ryan but its the same thing there. He was a coach who was deficient in a few areas but because he openly blasted Dallas and anyone else and had a brash attitude he is still revered to this day. But when you get to the nuts and bolts of it he was not a good HC. Great defensive coordinator though.

I do not believe that McNabb lacks confidence or has an issue with getting down when times are tough. The guy faced adversity since he was drafted here. He has never been embraced fully. He has also had to face that dope Limbaugh putting him out there like he did and also had to face the other dopey farger Modesire calling him out. McNabb has the will to win. He shows glimpses of emotion but not all the time. If he did not have the desire to not lose he wouldn't have stayed on the field to watch STL celebrate in 2001. If he did not have the desire to not lose he wouldn't play through some of the ailments that he has suffered. I think what you say about McNabb is totally off base, IMO.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 23, 2007, 01:48:45 PM
I believe that most people in the city would take player A and I don't get it.

you couldnt be more wrong...the people want a guy that can win a championship...if he had a personality and took the city under his wings  then the guy would be a legend in the city but thats a bonus...

best believe everyone would rather have mcnabb win a championship than be liked...however the problem is that mcnabbs attitude and personality very well may be the reason he cant win...


The guy faced adversity since he was drafted here

he has?

what true adversity has he faced?

a few fans booing him?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on January 23, 2007, 01:49:52 PM
TO was a bona fide adversity.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Quasimoto on January 23, 2007, 01:53:40 PM
Phreak do you not think McNabb could benefit from being a little more open and fiery on the field?  I think that type of personality commands more respect than someone who gets a little mopey or is acting jovial during a tight game.  McNabb is a million times more talented than Garcia but I think Garcia has a better head for the game. I think McNabb could learn from the way Garcia ran the team.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on January 23, 2007, 01:59:54 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 23, 2007, 01:48:45 PM
I believe that most people in the city would take player A and I don't get it.

you couldnt be more wrong...the people want a guy that can win a championship...if he had a personality and took the city under his wings  then the guy would be a legend in the city but thats a bonus...

best believe everyone would rather have mcnabb win a championship than be liked...however the problem is that mcnabbs attitude and personality very well may be the reason he cant win...


The guy faced adversity since he was drafted here

he has?

what true adversity has he faced?

a few fans booing him?

So why then wouldn't the people want the more talented player? You know, the guy who has the skills to win and doesn't need the offense kind of pared down for him. Or a guy who can still get things done once a defense adjusts to him. Donovan can do that.

Its not always all on the QB as to why they didn't win. Give McNabb the commitment to the running game like they gave Garcia and see what happens. That is what I want to see. And the defense fixed. This QB thing is a non-issue, IMO. But its being made into one by people who don't like Donovan and it drives me nuts.

And it was more than just a few fans. They started it and represented more than just a small group. The mayor was calling for Williams for crying out loud. And he was never fully embraced here. LIke I said before, the Limbaugh stuff, the Mondesire stuff, people firing bottles at his head, people cheering as he's sprawled out on the turf after getting blasted. Come on IGY, you listen to WIP. You know what the consensus on there (and from the fans on there) is of him - its not good.

Going back to a Garcia point real quick...when he was in SF at the end, and in Cleveland and Detroit he wasn't exactly the same guy we're seeing now. He even said himself that he lost that fire and that drive and even thought about retiring because of it.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 23, 2007, 02:00:06 PM
TO was a bona fide adversity.

youre joking right

i guess we have different definitions of adversity...tony dungys son dying in the middle of the playoffs last year is adversity...having an idiot teammate is not

ill even go with something like choking in the superbowl or losing all those championship games as adversity (even if some of it was self inflicted)

but come on...mcnabb had be coddled from day one under reid...so much so that he really doesnt have to face anything...christ hes in his eighth year and still is not allowed to give his own press conference

id even argue that not only has mcnabb not faced adversity but hes been forced to face less adversity than most qb's

i mean look at what rex grossman went thru this year...that wasnt any less adverse of a time than mcnabb has faced
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Wingspan on January 23, 2007, 02:01:04 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 23, 2007, 01:48:45 PM
The guy faced adversity since he was drafted here

he has?

what true adversity has he faced?

a few fans booing him?

Booing on Draft Day
Rush Limbaugh
Terrell Owens
His own mother

He gets more vemon thrown his way than anyone i can remember.


Quote from: Beef Rapp on January 23, 2007, 01:53:40 PM
Phreak do you not think McNabb could benefit from being a little more open and fiery on the field?  I think that type of personality commands more respect than someone who gets a little mopey or is acting jovial during a tight game.  McNabb is a million times more talented than Garcia but I think Garcia has a better head for the game. I think McNabb could learn from the way Garcia ran the team.


And in the end, what exactly did Garcia win?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Quasimoto on January 23, 2007, 02:03:24 PM
Garcia didn't win anything.  But he helped take them into the second round of the playoffs.  My point is that if that were McNabb in there doing the exact same things Garcia did and getting the exact same commitment to the run (which I will agree McNabb has never had that luxury in his career)  then we might be talking Super Bowl right now.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 23, 2007, 02:07:31 PM
Booing on Draft Day - again is this a joke?

Rush Limbaugh - not even close...there wasnt a person on the planet that agreed with that lunatic...the entire city was behind donovan on this one

Terrell Owens - the only aspect of this i will say that might have been tough (if it was true) is if half the locker room was against him...that def would fall under an adverse situation...then again hes done nothing to come back from that in fact it appears as if hes now upset at his teammates for supporting garcia (again if true)

His own mother - he agrees with his mother...supports what she said...so how is that adversity


again the guy has been sheltered more than most players...for him to play the poor me card is laughable
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on January 23, 2007, 02:07:42 PM
Quote from: Beef Rapp on January 23, 2007, 01:53:40 PM
Phreak do you not think McNabb could benefit from being a little more open and fiery on the field?  I think that type of personality commands more respect than someone who gets a little mopey or is acting jovial during a tight game.  McNabb is a million times more talented than Garcia but I think Garcia has a better head for the game. I think McNabb could learn from the way Garcia ran the team.

I don't think it makes one ounce of difference either way. You can be great and be a fiery guy. You can be fiery and average. You can be great but reserved. You can be average and reserved. Everyone is different.

If any other player on that field needs to see someone else being hyped up in order o get himself hyped up then whats the matter with him? Why does he have to see someone else be like that? You should have that fire all on your own.

Like I said in my last post - was Garcia's "better head" helping him in DET or CLE? No. It was talent and the talent around him.

Reid could learn from the way he ran the ball with Garcia and do that with McNabb. That is the only education that must go on here, IMO. Give your superstar QB the same benefit of not dropping back 40 times a game. Brian Westbrook is a bona fide stud. Let him help McNabb.

And how do we know he was mopey? Because he sits down on the water cooler with a towel draped over his head? Marvin Harrison sits alone on the end of the bench. Peyton Manning had his head down on Sunday while sitting on the water cooler.

Everyone is different and expresses themselves differently. Being vocal and appeasing the viewers with antics doesn't mean jack to me. I look at what is done on the field.

I know if I was on that offense I would take comfort in the fact that with Donovan in there we have a chance to score on any play. I know that he leads by example. He goes out there and gets the job done.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Quasimoto on January 23, 2007, 02:15:15 PM
I don't think it should make a difference but I think players perceive it that way.   I don't disagree that you should get fired up on your own but truthfully we know that not everyone can.  Some people need to be a little more motivated than others. 

Does anyone remember the quote (I think it was either Stallworth or Brown?) who said that when Donovan was in there they didn't work as hard on their routes because they knew he could make something out of nothing.  That is somewhat telling to me.  They should be running their asses off on every play regardless of the QB. 

Now I don't think whoever said it meant anything by it as much as they were trying to compliment McNabb.  But still...
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on January 23, 2007, 02:22:36 PM
Quote from: Beef Rapp on January 23, 2007, 02:15:15 PM
I don't think it should make a difference but I think players perceive it that way.   I don't disagree that you should get fired up on your own but truthfully we know that not everyone can.  Some people need to be a little more motivated than others. 

Does anyone remember the quote (I think it was either Stallworth or Brown?) who said that when Donovan was in there they didn't work as hard on their routes because they knew he could make something out of nothing.  That is somewhat telling to me.  They should be running their asses off on every play regardless of the QB. 

Now I don't think whoever said it meant anything by it as much as they were trying to compliment McNabb.  But still...

Yeah, I recall that. And I didn't like hearing that because to me it said they knew that if something broke down they would just wait for McNabb to bail the team out because he has done that so many times before. But it also said towards Jeff that they knew he was limited in what he can do so they had to concentrate more. Play hard all the time, guys/
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 23, 2007, 02:25:38 PM
I don't think it should make a difference but I think players perceive it that way

its not perception

an incredible desire to not lose and a firey persona make champions out of a lot of people...sometimes its the difference between a larry bird and a doctor j...or a derek jeter and a alex rodriguez a tom brady and a donovan mcnabb

are there exceptions to the rule...is there tim duncans out there who are just better than everyone else...sure

but much more often than not a hatred of losing....a REFUSAL to lose...the ability to lead others...a take no prisoners attitude is what puts people over the top...often its the difference between winners and losers

its what made michael jordan the best athlete ever
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Quasimoto on January 23, 2007, 02:48:23 PM
BTW, people who won't be on the roster next year:

http://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/homeNewsDetail.jsp?id=64025
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on January 23, 2007, 02:50:56 PM
I'd kind of hoped we'd put the Greg Richmond shtein to bed by now.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on January 23, 2007, 03:18:36 PM
This is gonna be a long motherfarging offseason. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on January 23, 2007, 03:21:09 PM
Will IGY try to murder Banner? Or go for the LJ Smith Autograph (https://wwwa.applyonlinenow.com/USCCapp/Ctl/entry?sc=FAAO7I)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Munson on January 23, 2007, 04:04:42 PM
IGY...McNabb, let alone his "not caring about losing", are not what has lost this team a few NFC Championships. Andy Reid's horrible play calling, lack of commitment to the run, and most recently crappy defense has been what has plauged this team. If McNabb cared about not losing in 2001, it wouldn't have been enough to overcome the fact that Marshall Faulk was carving up the run defense, and Andy Reid stopped running Duce in the 2nd half even though he was pretty effective. 2002 I think was probably the true choke job of this team, but even that you can't blame ALL on McNabb. His caring about losing would not have overcome the WR's playing piss poor. 2003...McNabb didn't even play half the game. He got drilled on a late hit roughing the passer call that was never called. 2004....Patriots were the better team, plain and simple. Eagles defense again showed up small in the big game.

McNabb is a great player, and can carry a team...but only so far. With so many things working against him (Bad play calling, lack of running game, defense playing bad, crappy WR's for 3 NFC Championship games)...It doesn't matter how much McNabb does or does not hate losing...there wasn't much more he could do.

Besides maybe 2002 of course, which I think was probably the biggest choke job ever. Bucs, at home, in the cold, wehere you've domianted them in recent years...and you lose. And the Bucs go on to get an EASY SB victory against the Raiders.

Let's call the QB who threw 4 TD's on a broken ankle and tried his best to play through a sports hernia despite the TO problems and a divided lockerroom...lets call him coddled. Just because he doesn't act tough and show over the top emotion...he's soft, not a leader, etc blah blah blah.

I know it's a long offseason...but there are MUCH bigger worries on this team right now besides McNabb's mind set. Like his knee, for example. Or the state of the front 7 on defense.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on January 23, 2007, 04:08:16 PM
milquetoast
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 23, 2007, 04:09:35 PM
mcnabb has been close enough more than enough times with teams more than capable of winning a title for me to say that his inner being is the reason they havent won a championship

but by all means if it makes you feel better about your teams qb...please keep making every excuse in the book for him
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on January 23, 2007, 04:16:48 PM
QuoteReid 'Disappointed' By Speculation
January 23, 2007
By BOB KENT


Head coach Andy Reid said Tuesday that he was "disappointed" in a published reports that franchise quarterback Donovan McNabb is unhappy with the Eagles organization and uncertain about his future in Philadelphia.

"I hate to see people have to make things up that aren't really true," Reid said in a conference call from the Senior Bowl in Mobile, AL. "He (Donovan) knows what's the truth and what isn't the truth. I'm not worried about that."

Despite the speculation, Reid stands by his decision last week to cancel McNabb's press conference that was scheduled for last Friday.

"It was my choice, not Donovan's choice," Reid said. "I don't feel any different."

A couple of different reports have said indicated that McNabb has been at odds with the team regarding issues ranging from his post-surgery rehabilitation to his standing in the locker room to the fact that he was not taken on the team charter for the playoff game in New Orleans.

The widely-read web site, ProFootballTalk.com had this report over the weekend: "As we hear it, McNabb was at some point determined to be behind schedule in his recovery from season-ending surgery to repair the injury that he suffered against the Titans. And McNabb has, on at least one occasion, blamed the delay on well-respected trainer Rick Burkholder.

"There's a school of thought that Eagles coach Andy Reid put the kibosh on McNabb's recent press conference due in part to concerns that McNabb would blab about the brouhaha.

"Complicating matters is the fact that the players have a strong affinity for backup Jeff Garcia, who led the team to a berth in the divisional playoffs. An industry source tells us that guys like tackle Jon Runyan and linebacker Jeremiah Trotter, both members of Reid's 'veterans' committee' have expressed strong support for Garcia."

Then, a column in The Trenton Times cited "people close to" McNabb as saying he "is not pleased with a lot that has happened since he tore the anterior cruciate ligament in his right knee in a loss to Tennessee on Nov. 19."

At the time of the injury, McNabb had been near the top of the league's charts in passing yards (2,647), touchdown passes (18 ), and QB rating (95.5). Along the way, he became the seventh player in NFL history to throw for 20,000 yards and rush for 2,500 more.

The story continued ...

"The franchise quarterback's unhappiness includes the fact head coach Andy Reid did not allow him to travel to the team's playoff game in New Orleans. There is a team rule that players on injured reserve do not travel ...

"McNabb also may be getting a vibe that some in the organization prefer (Jeff) Garcia over him. Lastly he was not pleased with the way his mother, Wilma, has been portrayed by Eagles fans and the local media for her blog on his Web site in which she stated that watching the Eagles win without her son 'is bittersweet.'"

Garcia was a more-than-sufficient replacement for the injured McNabb down the stretch. In seven games (6 starts), he threw 10 touchdown passes and only two interceptions on 188 attempts. Most importantly, he led the Eagles to a 5-1 record and an NFC East division championship.

The story went on to indicate the rumors are surfacing that McNabb or Garcia could land in Minnesota or Tampa Bay before next season.

Reid was not asked about the particular report. But he did reiterate his displeasure with what's being reported.

"I'm disappointed that people are making things up. That's the part I'm disappointed in," Reid said. "I think that people are making a lot of things up here that aren't true."

Reid goes after Eckel even though he doesn't drop his name. Eckel already hates Reid so I'm sure we'll see a column by Eckel in the next few days responding. And I'm sure we can count on Cataldi & Hughes to defend Eckel tomorrow.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Munson on January 23, 2007, 04:17:57 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 23, 2007, 04:09:35 PM
mcnabb has been close enough more than enough times with teams more than capable of winning a title for me to say that his inner being is the reason they havent won a championship

but by all means if it makes you feel better about your teams qb...please keep making every excuse in the book for him

Seriously, name a year besides 2002 that the Eagles SHOULD HAVE won the Super Bowl.

2001-They weren't even supposed to be in the NFC Title game, and the Rams were defiantely favored.

2002-Favored, should have won it all them

2003-McNabb was hurt for the entire 2nd half. But yeah, that loss...his fault

2004-Got them there, couldn't handle the Patriots D. Not many teams could that year.

2005-We all know what happened there.

2006-Was off to a great start, numbers stagnated, then he blew out his knee.

If this team can have the same commitment to the run next year with McNabb healthy, and the defense doesn't completely suck....They could have another chance. Other then that, I don't see a lot of teams that SHOULD have won the title and didn't because of McNabb's "weak pysche". 2002 is the only one that definatetly SHOULD HAVE, and McNabb choked hard in that game...as did the rest of the team.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 23, 2007, 04:20:46 PM
Seriously, name a year besides 2002 that the Eagles SHOULD HAVE won the Super Bowl.

i never said should have

no team ever should win..teams can win tho

the eagles have had teams that were 'more than capable' of winning


excuses are the words of losers....YOU are a loser
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on January 23, 2007, 04:25:31 PM
Isn't one year when a team "should have" won the Super Bowl and didn't enough reason to shake some things up?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Munson on January 23, 2007, 04:42:35 PM
Quote from: FFatPatt on January 23, 2007, 04:25:31 PM
Isn't one year when a team "should have" won the Super Bowl and didn't enough reason to shake some things up?

Not with the franchise QB. In other posistions, definately. They waited a year on it though, and again the WR's killed them in 03'. They went out and finally got the star WR in '04....and you know the rest of hte story.

If you're inferring that coaching changes should probably be made...yeah. Reid's an idiot. But then again, how many teams do YOU know of that go to the NFC Championship game, lose, and get fired for it?

And IGY, the Eagles could have won it THIS year, if you want to go by that logic. THe Eagles could have won it in 1999. The fact is that they probably SHOULDN'T have won it in 01, 03, and this year....2002 they should have...2004, maybe, but exactly how many teams could handle the Patriots that year? 2? The Eagles weren't one of them.

There's a difference between making excuses and giving reasons as to why you can't just say "These teams didn't win the Super Bowl because McNabb has a weak pysche." Just stop it.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 23, 2007, 04:49:13 PM
There's no difference between making excuses and giving reasons as to why

precisely
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MDS on January 23, 2007, 05:24:38 PM
JJ Outlaw = Superbowl
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on January 23, 2007, 05:46:11 PM
Eckel declined to appear on DNL....probably because Runyan was there...
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Mad-Lad on January 23, 2007, 05:51:53 PM
Quote from: BigEd76 on January 23, 2007, 05:46:11 PM
Eckel declined to appear on DNL....probably because Runyan was there...

do they not care for one another or is Eckel just afraid to make eye contact with Eagles players?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on January 23, 2007, 06:02:59 PM
Barkann read the PFT.com story directly to Runyan since Jon was named in the PFT report as being one of the veteran committee guys who was said to have expressed a preference towards Garcia.

Jon said (paraphrasing)"He's the starting QB at that time. What else are we going to say? You have to pledge your support for whoever is playing. That's the way it is. Donovan was out hurt so we had to get behind him (Garcia)"
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: phillywin2k5 on January 23, 2007, 06:15:38 PM
Progresso >> Chunky TAKE THAT MAMMA MCSTUPID!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Event Horizon on January 23, 2007, 06:30:47 PM
Quote from: Beef Rapp on January 23, 2007, 01:53:40 PM
Phreak do you not think McNabb could benefit from being a little more open and fiery on the field?  I think that type of personality commands more respect than someone who gets a little mopey or is acting jovial during a tight game.  McNabb is a million times more talented than Garcia but I think Garcia has a better head for the game. I think McNabb could learn from the way Garcia ran the team.


That's a bunch of crap!

The only one needing learning about the running of an offense is Reid. The "fiery" persona of Garcia is really overblown. He was winning. Do you think anyone recalls that crap if he's losing? No. And why did he win? He won because the offense was better called and balanced. Reid couldn't figure that out on his own because at the same time he was learning to become an OC he had the luxury of McNabb pulling his nuts out of the fire time and again. That is what he knows and that's what he does. When McNabb went down he was out of his element. Send in the outcasts. Garcia and Mornigwhiggle was off the hizzle because B-West and the offensive line are the shizzle. McNabb is blamed for the incompetence of Reid while Garcia gets the kudos for the competence of a disgraced coach. Think about that. Morningwaggle, someone unable to show himself a good HC in Detriot, is better at the job of play calling than his boss. It's really a shame.

Fire in the belly is beside the point. The point should be fire the Belly.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on January 23, 2007, 06:45:11 PM
Emotion plays a role in sports whether you want to believe it or not. You can't quantify it, so people love to argue against it, but anyone who has played any sort of sport knows that it plays a role.

McNabb and Reid have no emotions about losses. Or if they do, they are so internalized that they don't ever show. People are suspicious of that, and rightfully so. Saying Garcia is a better QB is idiocy. It's stupid beyond the point where it should even be discussed. But he is almost certainly more of a leader. Hell, I'm probably more of a leader. Emotion matters. The people that sit at the top of this team and should be the leaders don't have any of it.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Magical_Retard on January 23, 2007, 07:09:03 PM
man how do ppl  get inside sources like this? ecket has some and igy seemingly lives inside of mcnabbs mind to know every single emotion he has ever felt or does not feel.

i wish i was lucky like that.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 23, 2007, 07:42:50 PM
Jon said (paraphrasing)"He's the starting QB at that time. What else are we going to say? You have to pledge your support for whoever is playing. That's the way it is. Donovan was out hurt so we had to get behind him (Garcia)"

ironic no?...that mcnabb is upset about the same exact thing that started the whole TO fiasco
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on January 24, 2007, 12:19:47 AM
Garcia coming up on Leno's show after the commercial break
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MDS on January 24, 2007, 12:24:17 AM
Had it on mute while doing some econ homework. No idea he was on. Haha.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on January 24, 2007, 12:35:00 AM
quick recap:

-- Eubanks played the Eagles fight song when Garcia came out
-- Garcia gave one of those stupid Boscovs T-shirts to Jon Cryer, who was the main guest
-- talked about the boos he got from Eagles fans in the Titans and Panthers games
-- looked at Cryer (a NYC native) and bragged about beating the Giants twice in 4 weeks
-- said he talks to his dad before every game
-- said he talks to Bill Walsh occasionally and he isnt doing well health-wise
-- when asked about his future, he hesitated to say anything....."I hope we can work something about. I enjoyed my time in Philadelphia."  (bolded for the people that want to pick that one apart)
-- Leno:  "Can you work out another..."accident"? *wink wink nudge* "
-- picked the Colts to win the Super Bowl
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Munson on January 24, 2007, 12:57:29 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 23, 2007, 07:42:50 PM
Jon said (paraphrasing)"He's the starting QB at that time. What else are we going to say? You have to pledge your support for whoever is playing. That's the way it is. Donovan was out hurt so we had to get behind him (Garcia)"

ironic no?...that mcnabb is upset about the same exact thing that started the whole TO fiasco

McNabb not being allowed to go to a road game because he was on IR is what started the TO fiasco? ???
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 24, 2007, 06:31:09 AM
no mcnabb is upset with some of his teammates for being too pro garcia...did you even read runyans comments...can you read at all...are you retarded...or do you just read what you wanna hear
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyGirl on January 24, 2007, 07:58:54 AM
Mark Eckel's source?

Hugh Douglas

And a conversation with Kevin Johnson, who admittedly has not spoken to McNabb in months. He was speculating as to how McNabb was feeling.

Don't ask me how I know these things. But most of you know how.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 24, 2007, 08:10:22 AM
i dont know about all the not going to new orleans stuff or the issue with his mothers blog....but runyans comments clearly show that mcnabb was at least somewhat upset over the love garcia was getting...otherwise he would have no reason to try and defend his actions
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyGirl on January 24, 2007, 08:14:02 AM
He was on the show as he always is and was being bombarded with the stuff about McNabb. His response was in no way implying what you are saying at all. I watched it and he wasn't "defending" McNabb, he was just saying that McNabb was behind Garcia as the rest of the team was.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on January 24, 2007, 09:06:16 AM
Maybe I didn't write it correctly, but Runyan was saying that to refute the PFT report that he all of a sudden hitched his support wagon to Garcia.

Barkann read the report and then stopped at the section where Florio said that two player on the veterans committee were supporting Garcia.

Runyan then said that what else were they going to say to the coach and the media? That they don't support the backup? He said you roll with and support the guy who they put in there. That's the way it is.

Where does TO get brought into this and how does it show that McNabb was hurt? My typing McNabb was hurt was Runyan saying in essence "Donovan is out injured and we have to support the backup QB."

And I am not shocked that Kevin Johnson is being used as a source by Eckel. Not shocked at all.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on January 24, 2007, 09:07:42 AM
much ado about nothing
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyGirl on January 24, 2007, 09:10:15 AM
Quote from: FFatPatt on January 24, 2007, 09:07:42 AM
much ado about nothing

as it always is when Eckel is involved.

I was told by a friend of his that he craves attention...LOL
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on January 24, 2007, 09:13:30 AM
Thats because dude has Napoleon syndrome. Just like Danny Snyder.

He's supposed to be on HateMcNabbWIP610 this morning.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Wingspan on January 24, 2007, 09:13:40 AM
Quote from: BigEd76 on January 24, 2007, 12:35:00 AM

-- said he talks to his dad before every game


what a mentally fragile Hoyda
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on January 24, 2007, 09:18:17 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 23, 2007, 07:42:50 PM
Jon said (paraphrasing)"He's the starting QB at that time. What else are we going to say? You have to pledge your support for whoever is playing. That's the way it is. Donovan was out hurt so we had to get behind him (Garcia)"

ironic no?...that mcnabb is upset about the same exact thing that started the whole TO fiasco

I was thinking the exact same thing.  TO threw a hissy fit after he got hurt and McNabb said that the Eagles could win without him.   I don't know if McNabb is actually throwing a fit about it or not but it is the exact same situation as last year. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on January 24, 2007, 09:21:30 AM
Quote from: PhillyGirl on January 24, 2007, 09:10:15 AM
Quote from: FFatPatt on January 24, 2007, 09:07:42 AM
much ado about nothing

as it always is when Eckel is involved.

I was told by a friend of his that he craves attention...LOL

I wasn't only commenting about Eckel and those bringing credence to his blasphemy but also those who feel the need to constantly point out just how wrong he is and make a big deal about it.

It's a non-issue across the board.  Meh.  Meh.

Meh.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 24, 2007, 09:31:46 AM
what a mentally fragile Hoyda

if you saw garcias dad you wouldnt say that...dook is lunatic....i thought he was gonna rip someones head off at the skins game...id call him before the game too


I don't know if McNabb is actually throwing a fit about it or not but it is the exact same situation as last year.


i dont think hes throwing a fit but hes definitely not happy about it...i honestly dont think donovan has it in him to throw a fit about anything...as jeremiah trotter would say he doesnt have that dog in him...i mean TO basically took a dump on mcnabbs face for the better part of year and mcnabb did nothing...in fact it ended up having to be hugh that took shtein into his own hands...mcnabb did the black on black interview johnson...thats was his response to a year of abuse

with this current situation i just think donovan is so used to be spoiled and being the man that his feelings are hurt that everyone from his step father reid to morningwheg to the players absolutely loved garcia....those feelings are understandable...i mean you just turned 30 and blew out your knee...i think the fear of losing your job your career coming to its denouement or both is a scary thing...but you dont let it get to you and certainly dont let it be known...

part of it is andy and his ridiculous refusal to let mcnabb talk to the media...for god sakes the guy got hurt in november and still hasnt publically spoken about ANYTHING...its insane and were to to speak and let people know how he feels maybe all this garbage would be put to rest...then again maybe andy is afraid of what he has to say
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on January 24, 2007, 09:34:48 AM
The collective loathing of McNabb on this board is absurd.

All the guy has done is win.  Yeah, he hasn't won the big one, but damnit man, enough with the "he's a Hoyda" bullshtein.

He's not.  He's an excellent quarterback and we're damn lucky as fans to have had him these last eight years.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 24, 2007, 09:42:55 AM
hes not an excellent qb...hes a very good one...who also happens to be a Hoyda...its not loathing...its calling it as it is...people think i hate him...but i honestly dont...do i love him like i used to...no...but i hes still one of my favorite players on the team...but that doesnt mean you have to turn a blind eye to his faults


I wasn't only commenting about Eckel and those bringing credence to his blasphemy but also those who feel the need to constantly point out just how wrong he is and make a big deal about it.

thats cause eckel says things that arent pro eagle
best believe if eckel was all puppies and flowers regarding the team people would be touting him for a pulitzer prize
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyGirl on January 24, 2007, 09:43:24 AM
Of course, the "fans" in this city will run him out of town.  ::)


IGY, why don't you read Phreak's post explaining what you are blowing WAY out of proportion. You're making shtein up here.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on January 24, 2007, 09:45:28 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 24, 2007, 09:42:55 AM

thats cause eckel says things that arent pro eagle
best believe if eckel was all puppies and flowers regarding the team people would be touting him for a pulitzer prize


i don't agree with that.  basically, Eckel is Evil Spadaro.  people recognize the nonsense that is Spadaro as much, if not more, than they do with Eckel
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyGirl on January 24, 2007, 09:48:31 AM
Quote from: SunMo on January 24, 2007, 09:45:28 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 24, 2007, 09:42:55 AM

thats cause eckel says things that arent pro eagle
best believe if eckel was all puppies and flowers regarding the team people would be touting him for a pulitzer prize


i don't agree with that.  basically, Eckel is Evil Spadaro.  people recognize the nonsense that is Spadaro as much, if not more, than they do with Eckel

That might be the best explanation of ANYTHING I've ever heard. WTG!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on January 24, 2007, 09:49:09 AM
I second that....  SunMo just enlightened everyone  ^-^
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 24, 2007, 09:49:54 AM
im not blowing anything out of proportion...i agree with ff when he says its a non story

but what it is...is par for the course with mcnabb...for better or worse its just his personality...i think mcnabb is a great person...hes the opposite of TO...again i like the guy...but he has clear emotional issues and lacks a certain something that is needed to be a great not just a good player


basically, Eckel is Evil Spadaro

no way

read eckel when the eagles are winning...he writes articles praising them all the time...on the flip side read spadaro and look for him to speak negatively towards the team...will never happen

eckel i agree will destroy them more than most writers when things arent good...maybe thats why people think hes a hater...but he is right there to big up them when they do good things
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: mussa on January 24, 2007, 10:21:28 AM
Garcia was on Leno last night. When asked if he'd be back in Philly, he got this shtein look on his face, mumbled over some words and finally Leno broke in. He basically said that he'd love to come back, but he's going to test the waters.  Say goodbye to your great white savior.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 24, 2007, 10:26:32 AM
Say goodbye to your great white brown savior


bye
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on January 24, 2007, 10:35:18 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 24, 2007, 09:49:54 AMread eckel when the eagles are winning...he writes articles praising them all the time...on the flip side read spadaro and look for him to speak negatively towards the team...will never happen

Eckel doesn't work for the Eagles or have anything to do with their official website, so he can write whatever he wants and get away with it.  If the roles were reversed and Eckel had to represent the Eagles, he wouldn't write most of the crap he does.  Spadaro isn't 100% "yay team!" by any means.  He's just more careful with how he words things because he has to, but when he's off the record, he's highly critical of many players...

BTW, Eckel told the WIP morning show that he declined the appearance on DNL because A) he's bitter about being dumped by CSN without explanation, and B) he claims it wasn't in his best interest to appear on a show representing a competitor of the Trenton Times.  Please...
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on January 24, 2007, 10:38:21 AM
Quote from: BigEd76 on January 24, 2007, 10:35:18 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 24, 2007, 09:49:54 AMread eckel when the eagles are winning...he writes articles praising them all the time...on the flip side read spadaro and look for him to speak negatively towards the team...will never happen

Eckel doesn't work for the Eagles or have anything to do with their official website.  If the roles were reversed, you'd see similar results.  Spadaro isn't 100% "yay team!" by any means.  He's just more careful with how he words things because he has to, but when he's off the record, he's highly critical of many players...

He was with us, that's for sure.
.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 24, 2007, 10:45:02 AM
i never compared spads and eckel...everyone else does that as a way of disparaging eckel

that would be a slap in the face of eckel who whether you like him or not is a real sports reporter/writer...spads runs a website thats it...he is in no way a reporter of anykind...and hes as much a writer as anyone on this website
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on January 24, 2007, 10:48:25 AM
Neither one of them is worth arguing over.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on January 24, 2007, 10:49:24 AM
Eckel is a thug
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 24, 2007, 10:58:53 AM
lol
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on January 24, 2007, 01:01:17 PM
 :-D
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on January 24, 2007, 03:22:27 PM
Quote from: SunMo on January 24, 2007, 10:49:24 AM
Eckel is a thug

You mean he's black?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on January 24, 2007, 03:23:28 PM
at least partially, look at his hair for shteins sake
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Magical_Retard on January 24, 2007, 05:39:27 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 24, 2007, 09:42:55 AM
hes not an excellent qb...hes a very good one...who also happens to be a Hoyda...its not loathing...its calling it as it is...people think i hate him...but i honestly dont...do i love him like i used to...no...but i hes still one of my favorite players on the team...but that doesnt mean you have to turn a blind eye to his faults


I wasn't only commenting about Eckel and those bringing credence to his blasphemy but also those who feel the need to constantly point out just how wrong he is and make a big deal about it.

thats cause eckel says things that arent pro eagle
best believe if eckel was all puppies and flowers regarding the team people would be touting him for a pulitzer prize


when i look for faults in mcnabb i look for things in his game like how even though he is tons more accurate than he was in yrs past he still has bad throws far too often for my liking. i dont like how he has limited himself somewhat by not running enough as it keeps the defense guessing. i dont know if that is cause he is more comfortable and able to make the throws he is making or if its something he is purposely not doing. i also do not like the fact that he zings the ball when a WR is 3 yds away. thats critisizing his game...not GUESSING what his inner guts are made off and what he is thinking and how he doesnt get psyched up for a game or that he does not care about losing. all of that which you believe to be is true is just that...your opinion and thats not the truth. you act as if ppl here besides you give mcnabb a free pass. thats BS and you know that but the rest of us dont have the ability to know every emotion mcnabb feels.

and ppl would praise eckel? spads gets no praise, respect, credit, or anything besides ridicule so how would eckel be any diff? 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Geowhizzer on January 24, 2007, 08:33:44 PM
Igy, with the way I've seen you talk about McNabb over the past season, I'd be interested in seeing how you'd treat a player you didn't like.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 24, 2007, 09:43:48 PM
whether i hate a player or love him i dont let bias come into the mix...i call em as i see em

you may not agree with me...but everything i say i believe

for example im not someone like hunt is with iverson who will kill a hall of fame player simply because he hates him..and because of that bias he simply cannot bring himself to praise him in anyway and thus drops opinions that he really doesnt even believe himself
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Geowhizzer on January 24, 2007, 09:56:13 PM
OK, fair enough.  I just guess that I've never seen you say anything overly positive about McNabb.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 24, 2007, 10:03:30 PM
ive said hes a very good qb many a time

but truth be told he hasnt done anything overly praise worthy since before ive been on this board (and in general since making the superbowl...a lot of it due to injuries)...and at this point are you really gonna go out of your way to praise him for anything less than another superbowl appearance...i mean eveyone knows hes a quality qb...he now has to take that next step...how many times are you gonna praise him for a good game in october...the way i judge him now fair or not is can he or will he ever win a championship...and imo thats highly questionable
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: General_Failure on January 24, 2007, 10:11:03 PM
Quote from: Diomedes on January 24, 2007, 03:22:27 PM
Quote from: SunMo on January 24, 2007, 10:49:24 AM
Eckel is a thug

You mean he's black?

He didn't say he was uppity.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on January 24, 2007, 10:11:17 PM
I hate Westbrook. that is incredibly accurate.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: paco on January 25, 2007, 04:31:45 PM
I didnt see this anywhere else:

http://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/homeNewsDetail.jsp?id=64025 (http://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/homeNewsDetail.jsp?id=64025)

QuoteEagles Sign 15; Allocate Five To NFL Europe 

January 25, 2007
By BOB KENT & CHRIS McPHERSON


Philadelphia went international Thursday in signing Australian Football League veteran Saverio Rocca, who will add some flavor the competition at punter this offseason. This will be his first time playing with an NFL team. Earlier in the day, the team added to its offseason roster by signing cornerback Dustin Fox.
The 6-foot-5, 243-pound Rocca played in 257 career games and scored 748 goals in his 15-year career with the Collingwood Magpies and the North Melbourne Kangaroos.

The 33-year-old Rocca was Collingwood's leading goalkicker from 1993-1999. He was drafted by North Melbourne in 2000 and played with the Kangaroos through the 2006 season, leading the team in goals from 2001-02 and in 2004.

The Australian rules football player now hopes to follow in the footsteps of Australian-born players like Mat McBriar, Ben Graham, both of whom have enjoyed success punting in the NFL.

McBriar boasts a 36.8-yard net average for his three seasons in Dallas, while Graham has a 37.9-yard net average in two seasons with the Jets. Darren Bennett is another notable Australian-born player who had a nice career in the NFL.

Eagles punter Dirk Johnson, who inked a new six-year deal prior to the start of the regular season, finished the regular season with a 34.9-yard net. He dropped 21 of his 78 punts inside the 20-yard line.

Meanwhile, Fox joins former Villanova wide receiver J.J. Outlaw and 12 other new additions who were added on Tuesday. Outlaw was among five players allocated to play in NFL Europe this spring.


Andrews Out For Pro Bowl
The neck injury sustained by right guard Shawn Andrews in the playoff loss at New Orleans will keep him from participating in the Pro Bowl in Hawaii next month. An All-Pro, Andrews was slated to start for the NFC squad in his first trip to the Pro Bowl.

Andrews missed the entire second half against the Saints and was taken to a local hospital as a precaution.

"He's not sure exactly when it happened, but he had a tremendous amount of swelling there at halftime. He actually was having a tough time seeing," head coach Andy Reid said back on Jan. 14, a day after the Eagles were eliminated from the postseason.

Reid termed the injury as a "contusion in his neck." He said it was not a disc-related injury.

Chicago's Ruben Brown was added to the NFC roster Thursday to replace the Eagles' lineman.


Coach Reed Moves On
Eagles defensive assistant/quality control coach Mike Reed was hired as the defensive secondary coach for North Carolina State.

During his tenure in Philadelphia, Reed assisted the defensive coordinator in creating and editing the defensive playbook and weekly game plans, scouted opponents, and worked with the linebackers and special teams coaches. In 2002, he worked with the defensive secondary.


Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhanInDC on January 25, 2007, 04:45:01 PM
Quote from: paco on January 25, 2007, 04:31:45 PM
I didnt see this anywhere else:



I think it is in the "Things not worthy of a thread" thread in the general section. If it isn't, it should be.

Dustin Fox rocks though.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: paco on January 25, 2007, 04:49:53 PM
Quote from: PhillyPhaninDC on January 25, 2007, 04:45:01 PM
Quote from: paco on January 25, 2007, 04:31:45 PM
I didnt see this anywhere else:



I think it is in the "Things not worthy of a thread" thread in the general section. If it isn't, it should be.

Dustin Fox rocks though.

I was torn between here, with the NFL Europe part, and the "Eagles new punter?" thread with the news of us signing Saverio Rocca
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on January 25, 2007, 05:02:54 PM
Quote
Coach Reed Moves On

So close!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: paco on January 25, 2007, 05:12:50 PM
Quote from: FFatPatt on January 25, 2007, 05:02:54 PM
Quote
Coach Reed Moves On

So close!

Somewhere in Jersey, Mr. Eckel breifly jumped out of his chair.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: hunt on January 25, 2007, 08:58:02 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 24, 2007, 09:43:48 PM

for example im not someone like hunt

and you never will be....now keep my name out your mouth, white boy.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 25, 2007, 09:42:44 PM
sorry if i dont take gospel the nba ramblings of a acid wash jean wearing cancer patient looking old man yankee fan from the hills of union county
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Quasimoto on January 25, 2007, 09:56:25 PM
Sal Pal told MacNow that friends of McNabb are saying he said this:

"Either him (Garcia) or I will be playing for Tampa Bay next year."

Hmm? 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 25, 2007, 10:00:19 PM
so will ronde barber be moved to WR?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Quasimoto on January 25, 2007, 10:00:49 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 25, 2007, 10:00:19 PM
so will ronde barber be moved to WR?

:-D

Burn
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: hunt on January 25, 2007, 10:03:43 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 25, 2007, 09:42:44 PM
sorry if i dont take gospel the nba ramblings of a acid wash jean wearing cancer patient looking old man yankee fan from the hills of union county

what color is he?  is he white like you?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on January 25, 2007, 10:03:44 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 25, 2007, 10:00:19 PM
so will ronde barber be moved to WR?

I'm breaking my self imposed emoticon ban:  :-D

As for this latest story, I love how there are again 'unnamed sources'. What friends of McNabb would be talking to a loud mouth like Sal Pal. I'm calling Eckel type bullshtein.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: hunt on January 25, 2007, 10:07:04 PM
who cares about any of this?  we all know mcnabb is oversensitive & we all know he'll be qb of the eagles next season.  every single writer, journalist, "insider", & whatever spadaro is can go farg themselves.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on January 26, 2007, 12:17:29 AM
An email response from Eckel to one of the EMB people attacking him:

QuoteFirst of all get your facts straight, since you know nothing about me.
I'll give you some help.
Eagles Digest called me back in 1989 and offered me the job, actually begged me to take it. I thought about it for a day, or two and politely said no thanks.
They called Ed Hilt, of the AC Press, who also turned it down.
Then Dave, who was working at West Chester at the time, accepted it.
So that's the facts there.
I have no bitter feelings toward the Eagles. I covered them for 21 years. If I was as bitter as you suggest I would have asked to cover baseball or basketball or anything else long ago.
I'm also very good friends with several people who work for the team. And I host shows two or three times a week during the season with players on the team. So again your basis is off base.
Am I fan of the team? No, writers are not supposed to be fans of what they cover. Fact No. 2
Next, An Eagles rep called me this morning before I went on the air to let me know Andy did not mean me, but the Pro Football Talk website. Again, he called me to tell me that.
As for the caller, he said he heard it on another radio station. I tracked that down (that's called working) and found out where and what was said. But that was far from the nature of my column.
You can call me any name you would like.
But let's see I not only work for the paper, but for The Sporting News, WIP and assorted other media outlets. Not bad. Are there better, sure, but not a lot.
I stand by what I wrote and it's been confirmed by people like Hugh Douglas, who has a lot more access to things than most of us, because of his playing days. Even Howard Eskin, who also has excellent sources, confirmed my story. Something he normally would not do.
Finally, as far as Donovan. I want him here. He's a great player. If anything, and if you actually read the column, I took his side. I don't want to trade him. I just said what was being talked about. Why do you think people who know him well, would tell me things, because they trust me.
So you can believe what you want and think what you want, at least now you have the facts.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on January 26, 2007, 09:10:08 AM
Hugh Douglas and Howard Eskin?  I'm sold.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 26, 2007, 09:13:30 AM
OMG!

eckel can like mcnabb AND report that hes unhappy

unheard of


again it all comes down to eagle homers not liking a guy who doesnt always come up roses when talking about the team...end of story
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 26, 2007, 04:12:20 PM
Paul Domowitch | Offseason might sting, Birds fans
by Paul Domowitch

THREE PIECES of advice for Eagles fans as they prepare for an offseason not expected to bubble over with Super Bowl-here-we-come news: 1) stay away from the knife drawer; 2) keep the acid-reflux medicine close by; and 3) focus on the Phillies until the rookies report to Lehigh.

Between now and then, not much that will happen at One Nova-Care Way likely will bring much of a smile to your face, other than possibly the long-overdue pink slips expected to be given to Dhani Jones and Jerome McDougle.

The free-agent market is anorexic, but even if it weren't, and even if the Eagles actually were inclined to gobble up veterans, which they're not, they don't have their usual 1,000 acres of salary-cap space. After signing several young players to long-term extensions in 2006, they will head into free agency less than $13 million under the projected $109 million cap.

Free-agent quarterback Jeff Garcia, who helped resurrect the Eagles after Donovan McNabb's season-ending knee injury, probably won't be back. While the Eagles have said they want to re-sign him to back up McNabb again, at least three teams - Minnesota, Tampa Bay and Green Bay (if Brett Favre retires) - appear to be interested in the soon-to-be- 37-year-old Garcia as a possible short-term starter.

Wide receiver Donté Stallworth also probably is going bye-bye. The free-agent crop of wideouts is extremely lean, and Stallworth, who averaged 19.1 yards per catch this season, is expected to draw quite a bit of interest.

As with Garcia, the Eagles have said they wouldn't be averse to re-signing Stallworth. But they're not interested in a bidding war. General manager Tom Heckert is on record as saying he and coach Andy Reid would be content playing with a four-man receiving corps of Reggie Brown, Hank Baskett, Jason Avant and Greg Lewis. Wonder how Todd Pinkston's footsies are doing?

Two other free agents, nickel corner Rod Hood and former starting strong safety Mike Lewis, are history. Middle linebacker Jeremiah Trotter's future also is uncertain. Defensive coordinator Jim Johnson acknowledged after the Eagles' playoff loss to the Saints that Trotter, who didn't have a very good season and whose knees have begun to betray him, "can't play too many plays" anymore.

Trotter's salary jumps from $1.7 million in '06 to $2.63 million in '07. He could be released or asked to take a pay cut. What kind of adrenaline rush would an '07 starting linebacking corps of untested Chris Gocong, Omar Gaither (at Trotter's spot in the middle) and Matt McCoy give you? Thought so.

If you're hoping against hope that the Eagles will go after a linebacker or a big power back to complement Brian Westbrook in the first round of the draft, you probably will be disappointed there, too. Best bet right now is a safety or cornerback or, gulp, another defensive lineman.

Contract talk

The Eagles' smaller-than-usual salary-cap space is the result of two things: 1) contract extensions handed out last year to such young players as Shawn Andrews, Jamaal Jackson, Todd Herremans, Reggie Brown, Mike Patterson and Trent Cole; and 2) salary escalations of a number of vets.

Defensive end Jevon Kearse's base salary will jump from $2.1 million in '06 to $5.2 million in '07. Tackle Jon Runyan's increases from $1.15 million to $2.9 million. Westbrook, who signed an extension in November '05, will see his base salary jump from $585,000 to $2 million. Defensive end Darren Howard's doubles from $1 million to $2 million. Tackle William Thomas, who earned $3.65 million in '06, will make $4.55 million next season. Safety Brian Dawkins' salary, on the other hand, actually drops, from $3 million last season to $1.2 million on '07.

McNabb's salary and cap number stay flat. He earned $5.5 million in salary in '06 and will make the same in '07. His '07 cap number, which includes prorated bonuses, will be $8.6 million. McNabb's current deal runs through 2013. His base salaries and cap numbers for the final 6 years of his contract: 2008, $6.3 million ($9.4 million cap cost); 2009, $9.2 million ($10.4 million, one of two prorated bonuses expires); 2010, $10 million ($10 million, second prorated bonus expires); 2011, $12.1 million ($12.1 million); 2012, $14.1 million ($14.1 million); 2013, $16.2 million ($16.2 million).
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 26, 2007, 04:16:50 PM
so if domo is correct:

minus
garcia
jones
mcdougle
stallworth
mike lewis
rod hood
trotter

plus
baskett
avant
gocong
mccoy
1st round pick


Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: hunt on January 26, 2007, 04:21:45 PM
(http://www.lnbogen.com/content/binary/close_areyousure.gif)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MURP on January 26, 2007, 04:58:13 PM
I feel like I read that same article the past few offseasons.   
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on January 26, 2007, 06:03:07 PM
McCaffery with another WTF column...

QuoteControl freak Reid has created a crisis
Jack McCaffery, Times Sports Columnist
01/25/2007

Day One of the Andy Reid Era in Philadelphia, introductory press conference in a downtown ballroom, cameras everywhere, reporters interested, a franchise open to change. And a hint of what was to come. "We all want the same thing here," Reid said, before implying that the press should follow his rules and enjoy the ride to all football glory. In other words, he mistook Philadelphia then as he has mistaken it ever since for Green Bay, and since he never learned otherwise, now he has a crisis.

He has a crisis because he has one quarterback whom he has pummeled into sad timidity, softening him like a well-oiled catcher's mitt with years of needless protection, ridiculous diversion and relentless control. That would be Donovan McNabb, prone to injury and late-game stomach distress, interceptions at the worst of moments, weird humor and hair-trigger feelings. And the crisis began last week when, in a snapshot of the Reid-McNabb relationship, the head coach ordered the quarterback not to answer legitimate, responsible football questions in a reasonable, conventional setting -- and the quarterback retreated to his room, exactly as ordered, not allowed to say anything at the dinner table.

Reid also has the crisis because he has another quarterback who never submitted to control, generally speaks when he cares to speak and was willing to fly to Burbank, don an Eagles jersey and participate in a slapstick stunt for Jay Leno in which a Giants fan was flattened by a panel truck. That would be Jeff Garcia, prone to NFL survival, strong of personal sense and willing to embrace any football moment.

So where is the problem?

The problem is that once Reid misread his play chart and believed he could throw a blanket of camouflage leaves over the possibility of his worst fear -- a quarterback crisis -- the leaves began to smolder and there was no fire-extinguisher in sight. Having not learned anything since his Day One orders to the press were met with muffled laughs, Reid apparently didn't learn much, either, in whatever journalism program he may have taken at BYU. He never learned that cover-ups not only don't work, but encourage deeper digging.

In another situation, in another program, the two-headed quarterback monster would have been transformed by now into a lovable pet. In a 20-minute postseason press conference, ostensibly to provide a medical update concerning his surgically repaired knee, McNabb could have expressed delight at Garcia's success, thrust his fist to the sky and energized Eagles fans with the promise that he would return better than ever. At the worst, the Eagles would have two fine quarterbacks going forward, both with the same mission -- to put an end to the disgrace that is 0-since-1960. At best, McNabb's enthusiasm would have rendered Garcia's comedy trivial.

But by censoring McNabb, Reid only redirected the river of speculation. So once McNabb's thoughts were limited to his family members spraying damaging blogs, other voices began to peep. Some were underground, saying in printed reports that McNabb has been unhappy. Others -- like Brian Westbrook after a loss to the Saints in the playoffs -- openly, aggressively praised Garcia. Listen: "We have been saying that the whole time Jeff's been playing that he has brought that fire back and that competitiveness. He is a leader. Everybody has played better since Jeff has gotten in there and that is the true definition of a leader. When the guys can rally around Jeff and play better, you can't ask for much more."

That quote -- delivered downstairs in the Superdome, minutes after the Eagles season -- did not generate nearly enough attention. Read it again. And believe that it was said out loud, in front of plenty, with purpose.

That's where it is going -- and where Reid would like it to stop. There is a feeling in the clubhouse -- not a consensus, perhaps not even a plurality, but a feeling -- that the Birds would be fine with Garcia at quarterback. They means they would be fine without a $112,000,000 self-appointed "captain of the ship" with brittle bones and matching emotions. McNabb is still upset that 30 made-for-broadcast plants booed him at the draft. He nearly wept when Terrell Owens said something nice about Brett Favre. His camp even used the word "bittersweet" in connection with Garcia's success.

Now, this: An attempt at censorship, but resulting turmoil.

How will the Eagles respond? Well, they have had opportunities, beginning with Jeffrey Lurie's postseason press briefing in the locker room, to guarantee Garcia work. Instead, they punted. Now, Garcia wants to test the free-agent market. Just a guess, but once it is clear that McNabb is healthy, Andy's Media Army will begin to tout A.J. Feeley as the most capable backup since Harry Truman.

In the meantime, Reid will try to control everything he can. Indeed, it was interesting when Reid responded to questions about McNabb, the head coach sounded uncomfortable with the situation. The resulting headline: "Reid says he and McNabb still getting along well."

Reid says. Reid. Not McNabb. Reid says. And once he does, he expects everyone to accept that as truth and to keep marching.

Problem is, not everybody did on Day One. And a whole lot fewer are stomping that yard, all these unfulfilled promises later.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on January 26, 2007, 06:05:54 PM
Quote
stomping that yard

I quit.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on January 26, 2007, 06:06:16 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 26, 2007, 04:16:50 PM
so if domo is correct:

minus
garcia
jones
mcdougle
stallworth
mike lewis
rod hood
trotter

Nothing too earth shattering in there. I think we're all prepared for the fact that the fools are going to let Stallworth go. My brain hurts from thinking about them giving him away for nothing.

We knew Hood and Lewis were gone.

Garcia said he;s testing the FA market.

McDougle and Jones should have been cut before they went wheels up at the N'awlins airport.

The Trotter thing has started up and it's snowballing. Eckel was the first to say this. FWIW Gargano said the other day that Trot is going nowhere. We know he's not only plugged in with Trotter from doing the show but he's got Heckert in his ear too.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Magical_Retard on January 26, 2007, 07:19:27 PM
Quote from: BigEd76 on January 26, 2007, 06:03:07 PM
McCaffery with another WTF column...

QuoteControl freak Reid has created a crisis
Jack McCaffery, Times Sports Columnist
01/25/2007

Day One of the Andy Reid Era in Philadelphia, introductory press conference in a downtown ballroom, cameras everywhere, reporters interested, a franchise open to change. And a hint of what was to come. "We all want the same thing here," Reid said, before implying that the press should follow his rules and enjoy the ride to all football glory. In other words, he mistook Philadelphia then as he has mistaken it ever since for Green Bay, and since he never learned otherwise, now he has a crisis.

He has a crisis because he has one quarterback whom he has pummeled into sad timidity, softening him like a well-oiled catcher's mitt with years of needless protection, ridiculous diversion and relentless control. That would be Donovan McNabb, prone to injury and late-game stomach distress, interceptions at the worst of moments, weird humor and hair-trigger feelings. And the crisis began last week when, in a snapshot of the Reid-McNabb relationship, the head coach ordered the quarterback not to answer legitimate, responsible football questions in a reasonable, conventional setting -- and the quarterback retreated to his room, exactly as ordered, not allowed to say anything at the dinner table.

Reid also has the crisis because he has another quarterback who never submitted to control, generally speaks when he cares to speak and was willing to fly to Burbank, don an Eagles jersey and participate in a slapstick stunt for Jay Leno in which a Giants fan was flattened by a panel truck. That would be Jeff Garcia, prone to NFL survival, strong of personal sense and willing to embrace any football moment.

So where is the problem?

The problem is that once Reid misread his play chart and believed he could throw a blanket of camouflage leaves over the possibility of his worst fear -- a quarterback crisis -- the leaves began to smolder and there was no fire-extinguisher in sight. Having not learned anything since his Day One orders to the press were met with muffled laughs, Reid apparently didn't learn much, either, in whatever journalism program he may have taken at BYU. He never learned that cover-ups not only don't work, but encourage deeper digging.

In another situation, in another program, the two-headed quarterback monster would have been transformed by now into a lovable pet. In a 20-minute postseason press conference, ostensibly to provide a medical update concerning his surgically repaired knee, McNabb could have expressed delight at Garcia's success, thrust his fist to the sky and energized Eagles fans with the promise that he would return better than ever. At the worst, the Eagles would have two fine quarterbacks going forward, both with the same mission -- to put an end to the disgrace that is 0-since-1960. At best, McNabb's enthusiasm would have rendered Garcia's comedy trivial.

But by censoring McNabb, Reid only redirected the river of speculation. So once McNabb's thoughts were limited to his family members spraying damaging blogs, other voices began to peep. Some were underground, saying in printed reports that McNabb has been unhappy. Others -- like Brian Westbrook after a loss to the Saints in the playoffs -- openly, aggressively praised Garcia. Listen: "We have been saying that the whole time Jeff's been playing that he has brought that fire back and that competitiveness. He is a leader. Everybody has played better since Jeff has gotten in there and that is the true definition of a leader. When the guys can rally around Jeff and play better, you can't ask for much more."

That quote -- delivered downstairs in the Superdome, minutes after the Eagles season -- did not generate nearly enough attention. Read it again. And believe that it was said out loud, in front of plenty, with purpose.

That's where it is going -- and where Reid would like it to stop. There is a feeling in the clubhouse -- not a consensus, perhaps not even a plurality, but a feeling -- that the Birds would be fine with Garcia at quarterback. They means they would be fine without a $112,000,000 self-appointed "captain of the ship" with brittle bones and matching emotions. McNabb is still upset that 30 made-for-broadcast plants booed him at the draft. He nearly wept when Terrell Owens said something nice about Brett Favre. His camp even used the word "bittersweet" in connection with Garcia's success.

Now, this: An attempt at censorship, but resulting turmoil.

How will the Eagles respond? Well, they have had opportunities, beginning with Jeffrey Lurie's postseason press briefing in the locker room, to guarantee Garcia work. Instead, they punted. Now, Garcia wants to test the free-agent market. Just a guess, but once it is clear that McNabb is healthy, Andy's Media Army will begin to tout A.J. Feeley as the most capable backup since Harry Truman.

In the meantime, Reid will try to control everything he can. Indeed, it was interesting when Reid responded to questions about McNabb, the head coach sounded uncomfortable with the situation. The resulting headline: "Reid says he and McNabb still getting along well."

Reid says. Reid. Not McNabb. Reid says. And once he does, he expects everyone to accept that as truth and to keep marching.

Problem is, not everybody did on Day One. And a whole lot fewer are stomping that yard, all these unfulfilled promises later.

imagine if we went further into the playoffs or the superbowl? this is nothing, cause im sure we will get more articles like this but imagine...just imagine if we had gone further. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 26, 2007, 08:59:56 PM
Nothing too earth shattering in there. I think we're all prepared for the fact that the fools are going to let Stallworth go. My brain hurts from thinking about them giving him away for nothing.

We knew Hood and Lewis were gone.

Garcia said he;s testing the FA market.

McDougle and Jones should have been cut before they went wheels up at the N'awlins airport.

The Trotter thing has started up and it's snowballing. Eckel was the first to say this. FWIW Gargano said the other day that Trot is going nowhere. We know he's not only plugged in with Trotter from doing the show but he's got Heckert in his ear too.



its not about whos leaving its about who coming/replacing them...perhaps you could go over that list with us with the same vigor
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on January 26, 2007, 09:55:44 PM
No thanks. I don't have the energy to even think about it.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on January 27, 2007, 02:09:10 PM
This is one of the most depressing threads in a long time.  I think I may take the advice to stay away from the news.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 27, 2007, 02:13:12 PM
want some more dio?


Linebacker? U must be kidding
Birds unlikely to pick PSU LB in 1st round
By BERNARD FERNANDEZ
fernanb@phillynews.com

MOBILE, Ala. - Former Eagles linebacker John Bunt-ing was marveling at one of those little factoids that can make Senior Bowl week so interesting, and it isn't that almost every player here was measured shorter than they were listed by their respective universities.

Bunting, who is networking the coaching community after being fired by North Carolina, expressed incredulity that the Eagles have gone nearly three decades without drafting a linebacker in the first round. The last time the Eagles spent a No. 1 on a linebacker was in 1979, when they took UCLA's Jerry Robinson with the 21st overall pick.

"I can't say I follow the Eagles that closely anymore, but it is kind of amazing that they've gone almost three decades without taking a linebacker in the first round," said Bunting, an Eagle from 1972 to '82. "Their mind-set seems to be that they can just go out and find a linebacker that can play. Doesn't matter whether it's a free agent or someone from a lower round of the draft, they'll get him ready to play somehow, some way.

"And besides," Bunting reasoned, "there's not a lot of [Brian] Urlachers coming along."

No other NFL team has resisted taking a linebacker with its top pick as long as the Eagles.

Although several NFL analysts believe linebacker is a critical area the Eagles need to address soon, and several very appealing players at that position could be available when the team picks 26th in the first round on April 28, it appears that Robinson's status as one of the rarest of Birds is safe for at least another year.

The highest-rated linebackers here, on many teams' boards, are Penn State's Paul Posluszny and Ole Miss' Patrick Willis.

Eagles general manager Tom Heckert, who is here with head coach Andy Reid, team president Joe Banner and a phalanx of midnight green-clad scouts to inspect the prime beef, indicated that linebacker "probably is not a major priority for us right now."

"We kept eight [linebackers] throughout most of the year," Heckert said. "We have a lot of young players there with Omar [Gaither], Matt McCoy and Chris Gocong, and we're interested in seeing how [special-teams player] Tank Daniels develops."

Heckert identified the secondary, always at or near the front of Reid's to-do list, along with the offensive and defensive lines, as an area of more immediate concern. Free safety Brian Dawkins is headed to another Pro Bowl, but he is 33 and is going to start slowing down one of these days. Valued backup safety Quintin Mikell and nickel back Rod Hood are free agents who could bolt to teams offering starting jobs and higher salaries.

"It is true that we want to build on our offensive and defensive lines and on the corners," Heckert acknowledged. "We think that the chances on hitting on those guys later in the draft aren't very good, so if a good one's there, you'd better take him early.

"Our philosophy is that we can find linebackers and safeties a bit further down the line."

Given the Eagles' run of mostly sustained excellence since Reid was hired on Jan. 11, 1999, it's difficult to argue with the agenda he and Heckert have crafted. Big Red is nothing if not resolute, and a sign behind his big desk at the Nova-Care Center is inscribed with these words from Charles Lindbergh: "The important thing is to have a plan, and then to follow it step by step no matter how small or large each one by itself may seem."

But Mike Mayock, an analyst for the NFL Network and a regular contributor to Comcast SportsNet's "Daily News Live," believes at least one aspect of that etched-in-stone plan to be flawed. Mayock noted that middle linebacker Jeremiah Trotter is 30, that his creaky knees no longer allow him to be an every-down player. He also is aware that McCoy is undersized and got pushed around a lot last season before being replaced by Gaither, and that Gocong, who had an incredible 41 sacks as a defensive end at Cal Poly his last two seasons, has yet to play a down as an NFL linebacker after spending his rookie year on injured reserve.

Starting outside linebacker Dhani Jones almost certainly will not be retained and another veteran, Shawn Barber, also is a longshot to return.

"Since Andy's been in Philadelphia, he's believed that he could get - I don't want to say 'get by' - what he needs at linebacker from the free-agent pool," Mayock said. "For the most part he's used his high draft choices on offensive and defensive linemen. He's never really believed that you need to spend a high pick on a linebacker.

"But when I look around the NFL today, I see a lot of playmaking linebackers. The Eagles don't have any of them. To me, the Eagles need to upgrade that position with youth and talent."

Mayock believes Posluszny or Willis, or maybe even both, might be there when the Eagles' turn to pick comes up.

"I'm a big believer in value, wherever you're drafting," he said. "What's the best value you can get for your team? I think Posluszny and Willis are kind of borderline, mid- to late-first-round guys.

"Look, I love Posluszny, but there are mixed opinions about him in the scouting community. Some people have him as a second-rounder or even a third-rounder. I happen to think he's a first-rounder, but maybe more toward the back of Round 1. So, yeah, I think he'll be there when the Eagles draft.

"Willis is a little bit different. He's more of an inside 'backer whereas Posluszny is likely to play on the outside. And because Willis is not really a three-down linebacker, there's also a good chance he'll be there toward the end of the first round."

Can Posluszny, who has been called the "best linebacker ever to play at Penn State" by Jack Ham - the Nittany Lions linebacking great who earned four Super Bowl rings with the Steelers - become as dominant as Chicago's Urlacher or San Diego's Shawne Merriman? Can Willis, who was in on 137 tackles for Ole Miss and won the Butkus Award as the nation's top linebacker while Posluszny won his second Bednarik Award as the top defensive player? Only time will tell, but each has received strong reviews while here.

"I hear the thunder when he's out there,'' Tampa Bay Buccaneers coach Jon Gruden, the North team's head coach, said of Posluszny. "I turn around and it's No. 31, knocking somebody sideways in the hole. All I know is that this guy will hit you hard and hit you often.

"Hopefully, he's there for us at some point and we can add him to our team. I like him a lot."

Chris Mortenson, an NFL analyst for ESPN, feels just as strongly about Willis.

"An absolute stud," Mortenson said. "I know Andy's philosophy, and it's worked very well. But linebacker is an area he's going to have to address at some point. If they have a chance at Patrick Willis, I don't know why they wouldn't jump at him."

Heckert notes that the Eagles have drafted linebackers in early rounds during the Reid era - Barry Gardner in the second round in 1999, Quintin Caver in the second round in 2001, McCoy in the second round in 2005, Gocong in the third round and Gaither the fifth round in 2006. For the most part, serviceable players at best.

Heckert also might have pointed out that the Baltimore Ravens hit the linebacker jackpot when they drafted future Hall of Famer Ray Lewis with, yes, the 26th pick in the 1996 draft.

"You never say never," Heckert said of the chances the Eagles will take a linebacker in the first round of the draft for the first time since the Carter administration. "In football, anything is possible."


Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on January 27, 2007, 02:13:43 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 27, 2007, 02:13:12 PMwant some more dio?


Yeah baby, shtein on me!  Piss on me!!  Stab my balls!!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on January 27, 2007, 02:17:30 PM
Here's some more!

McNabb is probably jealous of Manning (http://www.phillyburbs.com/pb-dyn/news/130-01272007-1276133.html)  :-D

QuotePeyton Manning is everywhere.

Omnipresent on TV, seemingly making more commercials than the 1986 Super Bowl Shufflin' Bears combined. The Colts' quintessential quarterback is the face of the NFL, and he's in your face.

And no one seems to mind. Maybe it's the friendly face. The down-home dude with the computer-quick football mind, laser arm and boy-next-door persona seems to blend the best of both worlds.

Normally we grow sick of an overexposed superstar. But as much as a man making 100 million-plus could play the everyman, Manning pulls it off. (I especially like the credit card commercial where his paper boy throws one through Manning's window and Manning says, "That's all right, Rickey, you've still got the best arm in the neighborhood!")

I even heard the WIP morning team, which devours pro athletes like Wing Bowl, say they like Manning. I think most like Manning because they felt sorry for him all those years he couldn't beat the Patriots while being outmanned. He was becoming the NFL's A-Rod (great regular seasons, empty postseasons) though far more genuine and embraceable.

And now after engineering the greatest comeback in conference title game history, poetically over the Patriots, Manning's eternal validation ticket is stamped pending Super Bowl victory over the Bears. Right now Manning is The Man. America's quarterback, Madison Avenue's MVP.

"He's the nicest guy in the world, and everybody loves him," reasons Terry Lefton of Sports Business Daily and Journal.

Meanwhile, Mr. Chunky Soup, Donovan McNabb, reportedly is privately simmering, partly because some teammates prefer rejuvenated but 36-year-old Jeff Garcia. If it's true I can't blame him. McNabb has taken too much of the blame too long.

Somehow in this Philly-feel-good-till-New Orleans-story, McNabb became Mr. T to Garcia's Rocky. OK, I'm exaggerating, but after what McNabb's been through and overcome, his plummeting local popularity while rehabbing is disturbing. McNabb has had much more to fight through than Manning, more than the big-game shortfalls they've shared.

And he's equally worth rooting for.

From Rush Limbaugh to T.O., from a token rushing game that hurt him to season-ending injuries and clinically frustrated Philadelphia's annual rush to judgment, he faces a unique yearly test of toughness.

And yes, throw in the race card. Don't kid yourself that color isn't part of it. The vicious knee-jerk reactions of fans after McNabb throws one at the feet virtually prove that. As we celebrate two African-American coaches in a Super Bowl for the first time, it's hard to reconcile McNabb's relative lack of acceptance in Philly after five Pro Bowls, four NFC title games and one Super Bowl.

Is it personality? McNabb has seemed to need two personas — the corporate speak-type at press conferences, the radiant one elsewhere. The franchise face tries to be unflappable, but the perception grows that he's the anti-Manning — aloof and distant.

The more Andy Reid tries to avoid another soap opera, the more apparent it is there's dirty laundry, perhaps necessitating new uniforms for some. Reid only increased the speculation of McNabb's unhappiness by canceling his news conference. The coach has been more over-protective than Wilma McNabb, and maybe it's time he let his quarterback speak his mind. Tell us it's your team, Donovan, and those that can't deal with it will be dealt. You've got that power, and fortunately Reid isn't foolish enough to follow the polls and trade you.

It's hard for me to believe the perception that McNabb, who's as virtuous as Manning, has been mostly responsible for creating distance from teammates and fans. If he doesn't hang out with some of the Eagles enough, they should respect that he keeps hanging in there. The reality is the Eagles aren't far from another Super Bowl, primarily because he's one of the league's five best quarterbacks.

Reid leaves no doubt McNabb is his starting quarterback. But the Eagles can't finish the job until all of them believe it. Just as all the Colts kept believing in Manning.

Meanwhile, as the omnipresent Manning finally gets to the Super Bowl, Mr. Chunky Soup has to wonder why others keep stirring the pot.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 27, 2007, 02:20:51 PM
The coach has been more over-protective than Wilma McNabb, and maybe it's time he let his quarterback speak his mind. Tell us it's your team, Donovan, and those that can't deal with it will be dealt. You've got that power, and fortunately Reid isn't foolish enough to follow the polls and trade you.

^^^^
on point


btw im jealous of peyton manning
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on January 27, 2007, 03:35:33 PM
because he's 6'5" with a laser rocket arm and you're not?  :)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on January 27, 2007, 04:42:30 PM
and he has that hot moustache
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on January 27, 2007, 06:02:42 PM
As soon as Donovan has a PC and tells us and the media this is his team then that snatch on WIP will get all bitchy and say "you're not a leader and its not your team if you keep having to tell us". She does it all the time.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Munson on January 28, 2007, 03:50:03 AM
Quote from: PhillyGirl on January 24, 2007, 09:43:24 AM
Of course, the "fans" in this city will run him out of town.  ::)


IGY, why don't you read Phreak's post explaining what you are blowing WAY out of proportion. You're making shtein up here.

Thank you. I know it's about 3 days late but I havn't had internet access.

IGY, the only thing that has come out and been confirmed (and I don't even know if it officially has been) is that McNabb was upset about not being allowed to go to the NO game because he was on IR. Eckel and whoever else makes up a bunch of shtein, and you run with it like McNabb is upset with Runyan and whoever else because they supported Garcia. And again, Runyan on DNL said nothing that would make anyone think that McNabb was upset for those reasons. Others have already pointed that out here, but hey...you only read what you want to hear, apparently. Nothing haas come out with any facts backing it up that McNabb is upset for any other reason then not being allowed to the NO game.

But for some reason, you love to see things that aren't there.

Don't stop though, it's semi-amusing. that is incredibly accurate.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Geowhizzer on January 28, 2007, 08:33:20 AM
They should have brought McNabb... maybe if he were there Reid would have listened and they wouldn't have punted.  :boom
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on January 28, 2007, 05:35:23 PM
Roob (http://www.phillyburbs.com/pb-dyn/news/99-01282007-1283222.html) gives his offseason ideas

-- let Garcia walk and draft a QB in the 3rd round
-- draft a RB in day 1
-- replace Stallworth with a free agent or draft pick that has speed
-- Justice at LT and MJG at LG with the starters in camp
-- start Bunkley and Patterson, rotate Walker as a DE and DT, get a fat slob DT
-- hope for 1 more year of Trotter before replacing him with Gaither
-- hope Gocong gets SLB
-- give Tank Daniels more time in camp
-- re-sign Mikell and James as backups, then draft a big CB and a safety
-- give Bloom the return duties
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Father Demon on January 28, 2007, 06:28:53 PM
Quote from: BigEd76 on January 28, 2007, 05:35:23 PM
Roob (http://www.phillyburbs.com/pb-dyn/news/99-01282007-1283222.html) gives his offseason ideas
-- replace Stallworth with a free agent or draft pick that has speed

I have to assume that the FO is going this way because of the expected $$$ Stallworth will get in FA.  As mentioned somewhere else, the only apparent FA that makes me a little excited is Jackson, and a trade with Oakland for Porter if possible.  Other than that, there's nothing out there.

I wonder how much Rosenhaus is involved in the reason the Eagles haven't locked him up?  I would guess they tried, and Rosen came back and said some rediculous number or else it's FA.  That would explain why TH and Banner have been so open with the "see ya" route in the talks.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MDS on January 28, 2007, 07:48:57 PM
Quote from: BigEd76 on January 28, 2007, 05:35:23 PM
Roob (http://www.phillyburbs.com/pb-dyn/news/99-01282007-1283222.html) gives his offseason ideas

-- let Garcia walk and draft a QB in the 3rd round
-- draft a RB in day 1
-- replace Stallworth with a free agent or draft pick that has speed
-- Justice at LT and MJG at LG with the starters in camp
-- start Bunkley and Patterson, rotate Walker as a DE and DT, get a fat slob DT
-- hope for 1 more year of Trotter before replacing him with Gaither
-- hope Gocong gets SLB
-- give Tank Daniels more time in camp
-- re-sign Mikell and James as backups, then draft a big CB and a safety
-- give Bloom the return duties


herrermans what
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Munson on January 28, 2007, 08:14:13 PM
Quote from: Father Demon on January 28, 2007, 06:28:53 PM
Quote from: BigEd76 on January 28, 2007, 05:35:23 PM
Roob (http://www.phillyburbs.com/pb-dyn/news/99-01282007-1283222.html) gives his offseason ideas
-- replace Stallworth with a free agent or draft pick that has speed

I have to assume that the FO is going this way because of the expected $$$ Stallworth will get in FA.  As mentioned somewhere else, the only apparent FA that makes me a little excited is Jackson, and a trade with Oakland for Porter if possible.  Other than that, there's nothing out there.

I wonder how much Rosenhaus is involved in the reason the Eagles haven't locked him up?  I would guess they tried, and Rosen came back and said some rediculous number or else it's FA.  That would explain why TH and Banner have been so open with the "see ya" route in the talks.
No no, letting Stallworth go is some big FO conspiracy to protect McNabb and not spend money.

Actually, Stallworth will probably get overpaid to go somewhere else, which sucks...The Eagles need him (or a reciever like him with less injury problems to the groin/hammy area).

As for Roob...yeah, what's his beef with Herremans? I'd still rather see Herremans take over at RT in the future, but might as well keep him in there at guard until Runyan retires. Anything to keep Andrews in at RG please.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on January 28, 2007, 08:43:02 PM
Quote from: BigEd76 on January 28, 2007, 05:35:23 PM
Roob (http://www.phillyburbs.com/pb-dyn/news/99-01282007-1283222.html) gives his offseason ideas

-- let Garcia walk and draft a QB in the 3rd round
-- draft a RB in day 1
-- replace Stallworth with a free agent or draft pick that has speed
-- Justice at LT and MJG at LG with the starters in camp
-- start Bunkley and Patterson, rotate Walker as a DE and DT, get a fat slob DT
-- hope for 1 more year of Trotter before replacing him with Gaither
-- hope Gocong gets SLB
-- give Tank Daniels more time in camp
-- re-sign Mikell and James as backups, then draft a big CB and a safety
-- give Bloom the return duties

Most of that article is nauseating.  The worst part is that he's advocating doing nothing with the LB's.

I lost a lot of "respect" in Reuben Frank's football knowledge there.  It reads more like Spadaro than anything.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Drunkmasterflex on January 28, 2007, 11:56:45 PM
I like the idea of them letting Garcia go.  I really want to see a young QB in here.  I think AJ can do just as good of a job as Garcia did with this team.  Chris Leak would be an interesting choice or possibly that Kolb kid from Houston. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Munson on January 29, 2007, 01:05:58 AM
I like AJ in the Eagles offense. He seems comfortable in it, and has a good strong arm.

Maybe they'll draft Troy Smith. :paranoid
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: shorebird on January 29, 2007, 05:56:51 AM
Quote from: Drunkmasterflex on January 28, 2007, 11:56:45 PM
I like the idea of them letting Garcia go.  I really want to see a young QB in here.  I think AJ can do just as good of a job as Garcia did with this team.  Chris Leak would be an interesting choice or possibly that Kolb kid from Houston. 

I'd like to see A.J. as McNabb's backup next year. I remember saying that when Garcia was signed, but got chastised for wanting to discuss backup qb's.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on January 29, 2007, 09:15:20 AM
well, they might not have enough money to sign Stallworth, but at least they have Mike Patterson until the end of time.  you can't get mediocre DT's anywhere, you need to hold onto them when you get them
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on January 29, 2007, 10:08:43 AM
Quote from: SunMo on January 29, 2007, 09:15:20 AM
well, they might not have enough money to sign Stallworth, but at least they have Mike Patterson until the end of time.  you can't get mediocre DT's anywhere, you need to hold onto them when you get them

Have we abandoned the whole official sponsor thing, because if we haven't, I have to continue to disagree.

I have facts to back it up.  I need to dig deep, though.  VORP, bench press reps, etc... only the tip of the iceberg.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on January 30, 2007, 06:30:19 PM
im putting this here because there is nowhere else really to do it.

against my better judgement, i watched the end of the recap of the 2004 Patriots as the 9th greatest Super Bowl team ever.  two things:

1.  Bellicheck read the Eagles parade route to the team before the game, i had never heard that before.

2.  The last 5 minutes of the game made me furious all over again.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MDS on January 30, 2007, 06:53:36 PM
Shut up.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on January 30, 2007, 07:31:34 PM
Quote from: SunMo on January 30, 2007, 06:30:19 PM
1.  Bellicheck read the Eagles parade route to the team before the game, i had never heard that before.

Never heard that.  There's a reason he wins and it's not just the hoodie.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on January 30, 2007, 07:57:23 PM
That hoodie makes me want to murder children
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on January 30, 2007, 08:04:26 PM
yeah i saw this a couple weeks ago...the belichek speech is classic

but not nearly as bad as the bruschi interview where he talks about how the patriots were in a hurry up defense and whenever they broke their huddle they expected the eagles to be coming to the line of scimmage but instead they were just forming their own huddle...he said he couldnt believe what mcnabb was doing..after it continued to happy he said he told his team....i have no idea what they (the eagles) are doing but we are gonna play the defense called and go with it...
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on January 30, 2007, 08:06:24 PM
That performance will likely go down as quintessential Reid/McNabb.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 01, 2007, 09:13:08 AM
stephen a smith just verbally ass raped spadaro on wip...it was one of the best things ive ever heard and i wish i had taped it...he even physically threatened him
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyandBCEagles on February 02, 2007, 02:06:10 AM
Reading this thread made me inclinde towards killing myself, and this

Quote from: SunMo on January 30, 2007, 06:30:19 PM
1.  Bellicheck read the Eagles parade route to the team before the game, i had never heard that before.

Sealed the deal.

Is there ANYONE ON THIS fargING BOARD OR IN THE GODDAMN PHILADELPHIA METROPOLITAN AREA THAT DIDN'T KNOW THAT THAT WAS A BAD IDEA THE fargING MINUTE WE HEARD ABOUT IT?????

Un farging believable.


DRAFT MATT RYAN '08!!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on February 02, 2007, 11:34:50 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on February 01, 2007, 09:13:08 AM
stephen a smith just verbally ass raped spadaro on wip...it was one of the best things ive ever heard and i wish i had taped it...he even physically threatened him
You've got an erection, don't you?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on February 02, 2007, 11:50:37 AM
If erection lasts longer than 4 hours, consult a physician.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on February 02, 2007, 11:53:44 AM
... after I've called the wife, of course.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on February 02, 2007, 12:02:16 PM
Quote from: EagleFeva on February 02, 2007, 11:53:44 AM
... after I've called the wife, of course.

Yeah, right.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on February 04, 2007, 11:44:28 PM
Garcia on NBC10 says the Leno interview question about free agency caught him off-guard and he's in no hurry to leave just so he can start somewhere else.....says re-signing with the Eagles is his first choice...

Eskin is sticking to his story that Feeley was promised the #2 QB spot.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 04, 2007, 11:49:20 PM
btwn the knee injury and how garcia did to finish the year i dont think the eagles have a #2 qb position...more like 1a
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: QB Eagles on February 04, 2007, 11:58:01 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on February 01, 2007, 09:13:08 AM
stephen a smith just verbally ass raped spadaro on wip...it was one of the best things ive ever heard and i wish i had taped it...he even physically threatened him

Spadaro's live-blogging of Super Bowl Sunday (http://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/news/newsDetail.jsp?id=64464) is an embarrassing collection of random thoughts. Yes, he says "Sexy Rexy" and talks more about the commercials than the game. The cheese factor is up there with the nightmarish "Dreamweaver" video and his infamous video-blogging of the Eagles Super Bowl breakfast buffet.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 05, 2007, 12:14:12 AM
Spadaro's live-blogging of Super Bowl Sunday is an embarrassing collection of random thoughts


understatement of all time
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MDS on February 05, 2007, 02:22:48 AM
Who oversees PE.com? Banner? Like if Spadaro sucks ass so much who cares enough and is paying enough attention to the website content to fire him?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on February 05, 2007, 08:19:54 AM
This guy (http://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/team/frontofficebio.jsp?id=659)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on February 05, 2007, 10:45:56 AM
QuoteLance Briggs-LB-Bears Feb. 5 - 9:42 am et


The Bears are expected to place the franchise tag on Lance Briggs this off-season.

Briggs was looking for a monster signing bonus, and the Bears could quite sign him last summer. His value has only gone up, but letting him leave for free makes no sense. Briggs is a Drew Rosenhaus client, and may hold out of summer work if franchised.
Source: Chicago Sun Times
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on February 05, 2007, 10:48:12 AM
FWIW, PFT.com is reporting Cohwer is interested in the Panthers position if Fox is canned, If fox is canned fire JJ and get Fox in here for the D immediately
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on February 05, 2007, 10:49:38 AM
he'd get a head coaching job if he got fired, and if he didn't he'd stay out until he did, there's no way he'd take a coordinators job if he got fired
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 05, 2007, 10:52:37 AM
lurie will not fire reid and reid will not fire jj...EVER

the only case scenario for these guys not being around is if george jung and pablo escobar cause reid to step down and jj just doesnt wanna coach anymore
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on February 05, 2007, 11:10:35 AM
Quote from: Seabiscuit36 on February 05, 2007, 10:48:12 AM
FWIW, PFT.com is reporting Cohwer is interested in the Panthers position if Fox is canned, If fox is canned fire JJ and get Fox in here for the D immediately

PFT's full of it here.  Cowher's new home in Raleigh would be roughly a 3-hour commute from the Panthers' offices and practice facility.  Maybe if Fox is canned in a year or two, but definitely not this off-season at all.

Hell, Cowher's nearly as close to D.C. as he is to Charlotte.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on February 05, 2007, 11:27:35 AM
So what you're saying is that Gibbs is out and Cower is in for the Racists?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Cerevant on February 05, 2007, 11:29:38 AM
I think Cowher is too smart to take the Racists job.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on February 05, 2007, 11:30:49 AM
Quote from: Diomedes on February 05, 2007, 11:27:35 AM
So what you're saying is that Gibbs is out and Cower is in for the Racists?

Yes, of course!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: General_Failure on February 05, 2007, 01:01:21 PM
Touched by the Coaching Chin-gel?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on February 05, 2007, 01:23:18 PM
Chin gel...

Is that what Art sprays all over his Gibbs posters?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhanInDC on February 07, 2007, 09:29:50 AM
PFT.com:
Quote
POSTED 7:08 a.m. EST; UPDATED 8:11 a.m. EST, February 7, 2007

GARCIA WANTS TO GET PAID

While Eagles quarterback Jeff Garcia says that he is "very optimistic and open-minded (http://www.philly.com/mld/dailynews/sports/16640314.htm)" about the possibility of re-signing with the team that he led to the divisional round in 2006, Garcia made it clear that he'll need a contract well in excess of the one-year deal for the veteran minimum that he received a year ago.

"It's tough for me to sit here and say that I'm going to close all doors because there might be something out there that is either going to be interesting to me or force Philadelphia to not just think they can get away with giving me the same thing they gave me this past year," Garcia said.

Translation:  Garcia plans to hit the open market and force the Eagles to match (or come darn close to matching) the best offer he can get.

And that means, in our view, that he won't be back.  We can envision an offer to Garcia in the range of $3 million or more per year, maybe more.  And that's something that the Eagles simply won't touch.

Though we're inclined not to believe the predictable stream of "all is well" coming from the Eagles, Garcia, and starter Donovan McNabb regarding the ability of the two quarterbacks to coexist, if it's true that McNabb would welcome a return by Garcia then the Eagles should have signed Garcia to a longer-term deal when they signed him in 2006.

But the lure of the twist in the rules regarding the signing of veteran free agents was too strong for the Eagles, who have shown an affinity over the years for staying well under the salary cap.  By inking Garcia to a one-year contract worth $710,000, the Eagles carried a significantly lower cap charge.

And now that his contract is set to expire after one of his best performances of his career, Garcia is looking to turn that success into cash, as he rightly should.  "I realize what's best for me and I realize what's more comfortable for me," Garcia said.  "I know being here will be a great thing for me, so in no way will I turn my back on that, but in no way do I want to be taken advantage of for my hard work and dedication and for what I bring to the team.''

Garcia has been linked most prominently with the Vikings, since Minnesota uses the same offense that Garcia operated in Philly.  Other teams that have been mentioned as possible destinations include the Broncos and the Bears.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on February 07, 2007, 09:30:59 AM
PFT breaking the obvious
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhanInDC on February 07, 2007, 09:35:04 AM
Quote from: Diomedes on February 07, 2007, 09:30:59 AM
PFT breaking the obvious

True. But read these quotes:

Quote
"It's tough for me to sit here and say that I'm going to close all doors because there might be something out there that is either going to be interesting to me or force Philadelphia to not just think they can get away with giving me the same thing they gave me this past year," Garcia said.

Quote
"I know being here will be a great thing for me, so in no way will I turn my back on that, but in no way do I want to be taken advantage of for my hard work and dedication and for what I bring to the team.''

Garcia is outta here! Maybe it isn't such a bad thing....if Garcia goes they'd have to resign Stallworth, right?



Right?  :paranoid
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on February 07, 2007, 09:37:19 AM
Riiight.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on February 07, 2007, 09:49:20 AM
Get ready for the end-is-near overreaction from some when Garcia bolts. I don't blame the dude and if they paid him more than a mil to be the backup they're nuts anyway. Go with Feeley and draft a kid.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 07, 2007, 09:55:56 AM
this is important not because garcia is gone but for him calling out the front office...maybe his words will resonate more with them and they will ante up and pay stallworth to prove everyone wrong
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Beermonkey on February 07, 2007, 10:26:18 AM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on February 07, 2007, 09:49:20 AM
Get ready for the end-is-near overreaction from some when Garcia bolts. I don't blame the dude and if they paid him more than a mil to be the backup they're nuts anyway. Go with Feeley and draft a kid.

I've been resigned to Garcia being gone since the season ended. He was paid what he was worth at the time during the last free agency period. Based on his performance. he'd be nuts to not try & cash in. Based on the dwindling cap space, I also think that the FO would be nuts to pay him like a starter.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Wingspan on February 07, 2007, 10:39:40 AM
I don't care if Garcia bolts. If someone, like Minnesota pays him $4-5M for 2 or 3 seasons, that's there own problem.

Besides Garcia, while he played well for the most part, he did some pretty stupid things too, things that McNabb would have been murded for for the entire offseason. His won loss record mostly benefited from Westbrook's surgance and the better playcalling. Garcia was dangerously close to thowing 6-7 INTs at least, and only didn't because the DBs had dropped passes that hit them in the hands. Garcia also fumbled 5 times in the final stretch of the season.

He committed a LOT of penalties. The personal foul in his first Giants game, and made a terrible decision on a 3rd and 7 play in the saints playoff game when he threw it past the LOS, when he had 10 yards ahead of him for the 1st down.

But hey, he pumps his fist! Yay!

Garcia is a good backup QB, thats about it.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on February 07, 2007, 10:44:22 AM
one of the main reasons that the Eagles won the games they did when Garcia was playing was because the defense had stepped up and the running game was effective.  had the rest of the team been playing the way they played when Donovan was quarterbacking, they wouldn't have won the division, and maybe not made the playoffs.

Garcia played well, but he was just another component in an entire team effort that won them the division.  i have no doubts that Feely would have done the same thing had he been the one that played.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 07, 2007, 10:54:42 AM
wingspan says mcnabb > garcia
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Wingspan on February 07, 2007, 10:59:04 AM
Quote from: SunMo on February 07, 2007, 10:44:22 AM
one of the main reasons that the Eagles won the games they did when Garcia was playing was because the defense had stepped up and the running game was effective.  had the rest of the team been playing the way they played when Donovan was quarterbacking, they wouldn't have won the division, and maybe not made the playoffs.

Garcia played well, but he was just another component in an entire team effort that won them the division.  i have no doubts that Feely would have done the same thing had he been the one that played.

Agree.

Although with the way the Giants, Cowboys, and Falcons tanked, they would have made the playoffs anyway. Probably at 8-8
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on February 07, 2007, 11:40:02 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on February 07, 2007, 10:54:42 AM
wingspan says mcnabb > garcia

FF agrees.   But it sure would be nice if the playcalling, team, and McNabb himself learned some positive lessons while Garcia was under center.  If they go back to the way things were pre-Garcia, then nearly anyone > McNabb.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Wingspan on February 07, 2007, 11:42:41 AM
Quote from: FFatPatt on February 07, 2007, 11:40:02 AM
If they go back to the way things were pre-Garcia, then it doesnt matter on the QB as they will be on IR by week 8.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on February 07, 2007, 11:44:47 AM
nm

save it for another time
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: mussa on February 07, 2007, 11:50:52 AM
Quote from: FFatPatt on February 07, 2007, 11:40:02 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on February 07, 2007, 10:54:42 AM
wingspan says mcnabb > garcia

FF agrees.   But it sure would be nice if the playcalling, team, and McNabb himself learned some positive lessons while Garcia was under center.  If they go back to the way things were pre-Garcia, then nearly anyone > McNabb.

I wouldn't go that far and say nearly anyone. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on February 07, 2007, 11:52:26 AM
Garcia's gone. I don't consider him and option at this point. No QB is going to take less money and a backup role regardless of how great their situation is.
Feeley's cheap, has a better arm, is younger, and is a product of the system. Only problem with Feeley is Mitts isn't as hot as Carmela De Cesare.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: methdeez on February 07, 2007, 12:00:15 PM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on February 07, 2007, 11:52:26 AM
Garcia's gone. I don't consider him and option at this point. No QB is going to take less money and a backup role regardless of how great their situation is.
Feeley's cheap, has a better arm, is younger, and is a product of the system. Only problem with Feeley is Mitts isn't as hot as Carmela De Cesare.
Does the proximity of someone affect your ability to look up pictures of their girl on the intranets?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on February 07, 2007, 12:39:13 PM
Quote from: mussa on February 07, 2007, 11:50:52 AM
Quote from: FFatPatt on February 07, 2007, 11:40:02 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on February 07, 2007, 10:54:42 AM
wingspan says mcnabb > garcia

FF agrees.   But it sure would be nice if the playcalling, team, and McNabb himself learned some positive lessons while Garcia was under center.  If they go back to the way things were pre-Garcia, then nearly anyone > McNabb.

I wouldn't go that far and say nearly anyone. 

Would you if you could properly appreciate the effectiveness of using a slight exaggeration to make a generally-correct point about the imbalance of the offense before McNabb's injuries in both of the last two seasons?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Wingspan on February 07, 2007, 12:43:25 PM
That's one long sentence.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: mussa on February 07, 2007, 01:16:58 PM
Maybe two other Qb's could handle that offense.  It wasn't a slight exaggeration either.  McNabb was on a MVP season until shtein started hitting the fan. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on February 07, 2007, 02:11:56 PM
Statistics do not = MVP. He was 5-5 as a starter. An MVP he was not.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 07, 2007, 02:15:30 PM
McNabb was on a MVP season until shtein started hitting the fan. 

he was on an mvp season until he started playing not like an mvp
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Munson on February 07, 2007, 04:22:23 PM
I don't know about MVP, but he was almost certainly was going to get 30+ TD's again, something people said he wouldn't be able to do without a TO here.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Munson on February 07, 2007, 04:24:13 PM
With all the talk of the Colts UFA's on ESPN...what is the thoughts here on if the Eagles were to go out and sign Domonic Rhodes? Is he the right tyype of compliment to Westbrook, and would Reid continue to use the running game?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on February 07, 2007, 04:38:49 PM
Quote from: Munson on February 07, 2007, 04:24:13 PM
what is the thoughts here on if the Eagles were to go out and sign Domonic Rhodes?

I can't imagine much more of a waste.  If they sign anyone for the offense, it should be Stallworth.  Rhodes will be overpriced thanks to the ring, and the Eagles need to focus their personnel moves on defense this year.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Munson on February 07, 2007, 04:44:59 PM
Quote from: FFatPatt on February 07, 2007, 04:38:49 PM
Quote from: Munson on February 07, 2007, 04:24:13 PM
what is the thoughts here on if the Eagles were to go out and sign Domonic Rhodes?

I can't imagine much more of a waste.  If they sign anyone for the offense, it should be Stallworth.  Rhodes will be overpriced thanks to the ring, and the Eagles need to focus their personnel moves on defense this year.

That was along the lines that I was thinking. Just wondering what the general thoughts on him are here. I'm sure there will still be a mass clump of stupid fans who will tear the FO apart for not "even attempting" to sign him.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 07, 2007, 04:58:29 PM
but he was almost certainly was going to get 30+ TD's again, something people said he wouldn't be able to do without a TO here


actually he probably wasnt going to get 30.....never in his life has he even come close to 30 and his last three games before the injury and in the game he got hurt he was pretty friggin awful...in fact he was on a big time downward path at the time of his injury not spiraling towards 30 touchdowns

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Wingspan on February 07, 2007, 05:02:53 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on February 07, 2007, 04:58:29 PM
but he was almost certainly was going to get 30+ TD's again, something people said he wouldn't be able to do without a TO here


actually he probably wasnt going to get 30.....never in his life has he even come close to 30 and his last three games before the injury and in the game he got hurt he was pretty friggin awful...in fact he was on a big time downward path at the time of his injury not spiraling towards 30 touchdowns



he had 31 in 2004
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 07, 2007, 05:05:10 PM
the discussion was without TO
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 07, 2007, 05:10:18 PM
TO just called eskins show out of the blue...like if me or you called...and now they are going at it
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on February 07, 2007, 05:11:33 PM
no shtein
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 07, 2007, 05:12:18 PM
yeah its really bizarre
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on February 07, 2007, 05:17:29 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on February 07, 2007, 05:10:18 PM
TO just called eskins show out of the blue...like if me or you called...and now they are going at it
Ha, this is great! Eskin's really laying into him. He's asking him about feeding his family and why he didn't show up to the funeral Eskin had for him.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on February 07, 2007, 05:25:44 PM
Crazyness....  TO seemed to catch Eskin off guard with a few answers
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Event Horizon on February 07, 2007, 06:23:46 PM
Did Eskin ask him what is was like to run a HOF coach out of town?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on February 07, 2007, 07:06:47 PM
Quote from: Event Horizon on February 07, 2007, 06:23:46 PM
Did Eskin ask him what is was like to run a HOF coach out of town?

Link to interview (http://www.610wip.com/). Click on the link under the Podcast section on the right.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MDS on February 07, 2007, 07:58:59 PM
Recap anything worthwhile. I'm not listening to that shtein.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Event Horizon on February 07, 2007, 08:22:26 PM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on February 07, 2007, 07:06:47 PM
Quote from: Event Horizon on February 07, 2007, 06:23:46 PM
Did Eskin ask him what is was like to run a HOF coach out of town?

Link to interview (http://www.610wip.com/). Click on the link under the Podcast section on the right.

Thanks.

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v371/Mighty1ofJacob/hotblack.jpg)

Holly Molly!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on February 07, 2007, 08:29:24 PM
Quote from: MDS on February 07, 2007, 07:58:59 PM
Recap anything worthwhile. I'm not listening to that shtein.

Not really interesting yet. Just them bitching back and forth.

They met at Shaq's party. They shook hands and then TO called Howard a jerk and Howard told TO that he ran Tuna outta town.

The only funny thing so far is from TO...he calls Eskin out for hating him because he refused to do the fur coat ads with him. And this is true because once you slight Eskin, he'll rip you.

Eskin calling him out as a whiner.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on February 07, 2007, 08:37:31 PM
Jeez, both of these guys sound like a coupla bitches.

He said, she said, I was told, my sources say...blah, blah, blah.

You buried Bill! I did not!
You buried Bledsoe! I did not!

I was told you cannot get off press coverage and run good routes anymore. Go look at the film!

Terry Glenn is a better receiver than you! Nuh-uh!!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on February 07, 2007, 08:44:07 PM
Eskin said no team would sign TO if Dallas doesn't pick up the roster bonus.  TO thinks Eskin is full of ish...
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on February 07, 2007, 08:44:12 PM
Everywhere you go there is problems. What problems?!?

Did you make Dallas a better team? Yes.
No you didn't, same record.

The guy who covers the Cowboys for ESPN says players are tired of your stuff. Do you honestly believe that? If they wanted me gone I'd be gone.

But Dallas has until June to pay your roster bonus, right? (silence.....) Uh, yeah.

TO says that God led him over to Donovan to tell him something. He went over to Donovan to tell him he has much love for him and wish him well with his knee rehab. Donovan wished him well with his hand. Still has "much love" for Donovan.

Do you think you'll be back with Dallas? Absolutely.

I don't. And if you think you'll have another job, you're wrong. How many chances do you get? Do you honestly think I won't have a team if Dallas cuts me? Please.

I still have much love for Philadelphia fans!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Munson on February 07, 2007, 08:57:19 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on February 07, 2007, 04:58:29 PM
but he was almost certainly was going to get 30+ TD's again, something people said he wouldn't be able to do without a TO here


actually he probably wasnt going to get 30.....never in his life has he even come close to 30 and his last three games before the injury and in the game he got hurt he was pretty friggin awful...in fact he was on a big time downward path at the time of his injury not spiraling towards 30 touchdowns



McNabb had 18 TD's before he went down. Now whether they were going to win enough games and/or get into the playoffs or not, who knows. But we all know that if McNabb never went down, Reid would have passed enough for the rest of the season for McNabb to pick up 12 more passing TD's. He would have had 6 games (the rest of the Tenn. game plus 5 more) to get 12 TD's. I think it certainly could have been done. And he did get 25 in 2001 with a much worse surrounding cast.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on February 07, 2007, 09:00:36 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on February 07, 2007, 04:58:29 PM
but he was almost certainly was going to get 30+ TD's again, something people said he wouldn't be able to do without a TO here


actually he probably wasnt going to get 30.....never in his life has he even come close to 30 and his last three games before the injury and in the game he got hurt he was pretty friggin awful...in fact he was on a big time downward path at the time of his injury not spiraling towards 30 touchdowns



31 TD passes in 2004.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on February 07, 2007, 09:02:36 PM
He would have had roughly 30 TD's, roughly 25 INT's, and a lot of superficial injuries.

Westbrook would be healthy and bored.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Munson on February 07, 2007, 09:04:06 PM
Quote from: FFatPatt on February 07, 2007, 09:02:36 PM
He would have had roughly 30 TD's, roughly 25 INT's, and a lot of superficial injuries.

Westbrook would be healthy and bored.

12 TDs, 19 INT's in 6 games? :sly
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 07, 2007, 09:05:16 PM
i suppose it could have been done but to say it certainly would have been done is a huge stretch for a guy that has proven he just is not capable of getting anywhere close to 30 without a TO...and as i said this year he had a good start but was really going downhill when he got hurt...all those factors considered i would tend to lean against him doing it

no point in arguing it tho cause once again he didnt do it
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Munson on February 07, 2007, 09:14:13 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on February 07, 2007, 09:05:16 PM
i suppose it could have been done but to say it certainly would have been done is a huge stretch for a guy that has proven he just is not capable of getting anywhere close to 30 without a TO...and as i said this year he had a good start but was really going downhill when he got hurt...all those factors considered i would tend to lean against him doing it

no point in arguing it tho cause once again he didnt do it

Well he played a tough defense in JAX and laid an egg...but other then that, the "downhill" direction was more of a "he's not scoring fast in the first half"....he wasn't not scoring period. Of course Westbrook being an amazing player was the reason for at least ONE of them TD's in the Bucs game, but you know...
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Eagaholic on February 07, 2007, 09:51:14 PM
About the interview, I think To got the best of Howard and the interview was only average. Both missed obvious slam dunks.

Howard drilling TO that DB's around the league told him he can't get off press coverage and he doesn't run routes well anymore. They got into arguing about how well he runs routes and look at the film and - OK I will BS.  All TO had to say was "Howard, if you know anything about football, tell me out of all the receivers in the entire NFL, who had the most TD's?"   "Does Marvin Harrison run good routes? Who had more td's than him?"  He could have made eskin look absurd for saying those things.

On the other hand, eskin challenged him about yelling after the Dallas/Eagles game, "Why am I here?!" and crying that he didn't get the ball enough.

TO said yeah, if they are loosing and aren't getting the ball to him he should say that.

Eskin totally missed nailing him with the reason why he didn't have more catches is because he had multiple drops, including in a key situation for a sure TD, he alligatored the ball when Micheal Lewis was about to nail him, and he just stood there watching after Dawkins intercepted a pass for him - THAT'S why he they were loosing and he didn't get more passes.

It seemed all eskin could do in the last half of the interview was to try and say as many times as possible that TO can always call his show, anytime.


Grade

Eskin: D+

TO: C+
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 07, 2007, 09:55:47 PM
pretty sure they dont hate each other even 1% as much as eskin leads on and that eskin and TO planned this in miami figuring it was good for both of them

it sounded and felt exactly like the eskin bernard hopkins faux debate
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Geowhizzer on February 07, 2007, 09:57:46 PM
Two arrogant jerks engaging in mutual mass-debation?  No thanks.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on February 07, 2007, 11:05:05 PM
Quote from: Munson on February 07, 2007, 08:57:19 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on February 07, 2007, 04:58:29 PM
but he was almost certainly was going to get 30+ TD's again, something people said he wouldn't be able to do without a TO here


actually he probably wasnt going to get 30.....never in his life has he even come close to 30 and his last three games before the injury and in the game he got hurt he was pretty friggin awful...in fact he was on a big time downward path at the time of his injury not spiraling towards 30 touchdowns



McNabb had 18 TD's before he went down. Now whether they were going to win enough games and/or get into the playoffs or not, who knows. But we all know that if McNabb never went down, Reid would have passed enough for the rest of the season for McNabb to pick up 12 more passing TD's. He would have had 6 games (the rest of the Tenn. game plus 5 more) to get 12 TD's. I think it certainly could have been done. And he did get 25 in 2001 with a much worse surrounding cast.

So through 10 games against relatively easy competition he had 18 TDs. But through the last 6 games against better competition he would increase his touchdowns per game?

You're smrt.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Munson on February 08, 2007, 01:05:08 AM
I'm glad you read entire posts.

Considering that Reid would have continued to throw the ball like a mad-man, and considering that the "tougher" competition consisted of the absolutely fantastic defenses of Carolina, Indy, NYG, Washington (again), Dallas, and ATL...Yes, McNabb could have easily thrown for 12 more TD's. Yeah, those teams were MUCH tougher competition then the Jags D (the only team that succesfully shut down the Eagles offense for 4 quarters) at the time the Eagles played them. Sure, Dallas' D played good all year, but they were playing not up to par when that game rolled around..and yes, the Indy D played well in the playoffs...but they were TERRIBLE at the time the Eagles played them. Other then those two piss poor arguments that you could make, I don't see a "tough" defense in that bunch of 6 games.

After the taterskins game, he had 18 TD's through 9 games. That's 2 per game. 2 per game over 7 FULL remaining games (He was given credit for a 10th "game" in which he tore his ACL after a quarter of play) is 14 TD's, which puts him at 32 touchdowns for the season.  Also keep in the mind that the ONLY team that held him to under 2 passing touchdowns in a game during the 2006 season was the Jaxsonville Jaguars. So no, it is not a stretch at all to think he would have broken 30 passing TD's for the season. Thank you for coming, nice try, but you lose. And brush up on your math skills.

You're smrt. that is incredibly accurate.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 08, 2007, 08:42:22 AM
your entire argument is based on simply prorating his statistics...sports dont work like that...if you more intelligently based your argument on mcnabbs entire body of work over his career and the way he was playing at the time of his injury you would realize he most likely was not gonna get 30

you probably would be better arguing that he would have beaten his all time non TO career high of 25....thats something you can say he "certainly" would have done
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Wingspan on February 08, 2007, 10:24:44 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on February 07, 2007, 09:05:16 PM
i suppose it could have been done but to say it certainly would have been done is a huge stretch for a guy that has proven he just is not capable of getting anywhere close to 30 without a TO...and as i said this year he had a good start but was really going downhill when he got hurt...all those factors considered i would tend to lean against him doing it

no point in arguing it tho cause once again he didnt do it


Wrong, he had a great start. And leveled off and played well. He had one really bad game in the Jacksonville game. And one Jeckyl and Hyde game for the tampa game (3 INTs in the 1st half, 3 TDs in the second half). The jacksonville was the only game where he did not throw at least 2 TDs.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 08, 2007, 10:34:58 AM
he single handedly lost the tampa game...was brutal in the jacksonville and washington games and was downright horrific in the tenn game before he got hurt...to me that doesnt bode well going for 30 td's...

but again the bottom line here is that other than ONE year with TO he has never gotten 30 and he didnt do it again this year...but if makes you feel better about him to say he would have done it this year then be proud...would have could have should have are all words of losers...

i dont even know why we are debating a hypothetical so much...probably cause we like to argue
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Quasimoto on February 08, 2007, 11:09:34 AM
Westbrook lost the Tampa game by not slowing down on his long TD catch at the end.

Only kidding. :)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Wingspan on February 08, 2007, 11:24:01 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on February 08, 2007, 10:34:58 AM
he single handedly lost the tampa game...was brutal in the jacksonville and washington games and was downright horrific in the tenn game before he got hurt...to me that doesnt bode well going for 30 td's...

but again the bottom line here is that other than ONE year with TO he has never gotten 30 and he didnt do it again this year...but if makes you feel better about him to say he would have done it this year then be proud...would have could have should have are all words of losers...

i dont even know why we are debating a hypothetical so much...probably cause we like to argue

he had 2TDs and 0INTs with a 107 passer rating in the taterskin game.

and the Tampa game, while he pretty much put them in a big hole. He countered that with one of the greatest 4th Quarters I have ever seen, he had led the birds to 3 straight 80 yard TD drives, including one with 2 minutes remaining.

You relentless persuit to bash the guy is unreal.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhanInDC on February 08, 2007, 01:35:24 PM
Quote
Eagles' free agents unlikely to get tagged
Starting today, teams can designate 'franchise' players
By GEOFF MOSHER, The News Journal

Posted Thursday, February 8, 2007
Free agency is still more than three weeks away, but the first step to revamping an NFL team begins today.

Historically, though, it's not a big day for the Eagles.

Starting today and running through Feb. 22, teams can designate their franchise or transition players. The distinction is a way of keeping players from entering the free-agent market by paying them around the average of the top five or top 10 salaries at that player's position.

If a franchise-tagged player signs with someone else, the team that signs him must fork over two first-round draft picks to the team that tagged him.

The tags help salary cap gurus, such as Eagles president/capologist Joe Banner, build their team by keeping standout players without locking them into long-term contracts.

Players usually favor long-term deals over franchise tags, which is why both cases in which the Eagles have attempted to use the tag have backfired.

Two years ago, they tagged defensive tackle Corey Simon, a former No. 6 overall pick, as their franchise player with a $5.1 million payout.

An unhappy Simon, who had looked forward to cashing in on a long-term contract, held out of minicamp and training camp and the Eagles eventually removed the tag in August, allowing Simon to become a free-agent and sign with the Colts.

In 2002, linebacker Jeremiah Trotter was saddled with the franchise tag. The move angered Trotter, and the organization withdrew the tag in April and let Trotter bolt for the taterskins before coming back to the Eagles in 2004.


Nobody in this year's flock is likely to be tagged. None of their top free agents -- Donté Stallworth, Jeff Garcia and Juqua Thomas -- command a salary near the top five at their position.

On the flip side, free agents the Eagles might be targeting -- say, for example, Baltimore All-Pro linebacker Adalius Thomas or Bears linebacker Lance Briggs -- are more likely to be tagged by their teams.

Here's a breakdown of the Eagles' free agents by position and their chances of sticking around.

Quarterback

Garcia will seek a starting job elsewhere. If nothing blows his mind, he can return to the Eagles for an incentive-laden contract based on playing time.

Koy Detmer enjoyed a nice two-game comeback but probably won't be around next year. At least, not until the playoffs.

Running back

The going rate for tagged running backs is around $7 million, not the kind of cash Correll Buckhalter can expect. Brian Westbrook doesn't make that. If Reno Mahe is back, it'll probably be on a one-year deal.

Wide receiver

The Eagles are unlikely to dole out $7.6 million -- the receiver tag number -- for Stallworth, an oft-injured wideout who probably won't command that kind of money on the free-agent market.
Defensive line

Thomas is probably someone the Eagles would like to keep, but not for the $8.6 million franchise tender they'd have to pay him. Look for Thomas, a linebacker/end hybrid who was the Eagles' top pass rusher most of the season, to test the market. His versatility makes him appealing for 3-4 defensive teams that have money to spend (think New England).

Linebacker

Shawn Barber recently turned 32 and hasn't played a full season since 2003. His return status is in doubt.

Cornerback

The Eagles could franchise Rod Hood, but they'd have to pay him almost $8 million, a hefty salary for a nickel cornerback. Someone will give Hood a fat contract -- and a starting job -- but it won't be the Eagles.

Safety

Entering the 2006 season, Michael Lewis looked like a potential franchise-tag candidate. That was before the Pro Bowl safety got demoted. Lewis is likely a goner. He thinks he should start and some other team probably does, too. Quintin Mikell could also get some decent looks in the market.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 08, 2007, 01:50:08 PM
ill say it again the whole lewis thing was a disgrace what they did to him...they deserve what they get with considine next year
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhanInDC on February 08, 2007, 01:52:27 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on February 08, 2007, 01:50:08 PM
ill say it again the whole lewis thing was a disgrace what they did to him...they deserve what they get with considine next year

I'm thinking Considine will be a situational guy next year. I think we'll have a rookie take his starting spot.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: bobbyinlondon on February 08, 2007, 01:58:36 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on February 08, 2007, 10:34:58 AM
he single handedly lost the tampa game...was brutal in the jacksonville and washington games and was downright horrific in the tenn game before he got hurt...to me that doesnt bode well going for 30 td's...

but again the bottom line here is that other than ONE year with TO he has never gotten 30 and he didnt do it again this year...but if makes you feel better about him to say he would have done it this year then be proud...would have could have should have are all words of losers...

i dont even know why we are debating a hypothetical so much...probably cause we like to argue

So STs breakdowns and defense at the end of the Buc game had nothing to do with them losing? Jason Avant losing a fumble on the first Eagles drive at the Buc 20 had nothing to do with them losing? The defense allowing 2 long drives (14 plays 8.05 and 11 plays 5.58) that resulted in FGs had nothing to do with losing those games?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 08, 2007, 02:25:08 PM
I'm thinking Considine will be a situational guy next year. I think we'll have a rookie take his starting spot.

either way they are getting rid of a guy because he wants too much money

even tho hes gonna go on the open market and get caked off nicely by any one of a number of teams

who realize that hes all of a sudden not a good football player simply because he got put in a couple bad situations where he had to cover a wide receiver one on one....tell me how many strong safeties in this league could stay with joe horn man up in the open field

this is another case of the eagles having a player who didnt accept their intital offer and probably wants a few more bucks than they are willing to give and once he did that much like rod hood he started to see the field less and less and now will be jettisoned and replaced by an inferior player
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on February 08, 2007, 02:31:05 PM
a few times?  a few?

Opposing teams were targeting Lewis because they know he's weak ass.  Worse, it wasn't that he beaten by Joe Horn so much as that he was consistently beaten by his own poor thinking.   The guy bites on draws and fakes to the underneath route far too much.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Wingspan on February 08, 2007, 02:33:54 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on February 08, 2007, 02:25:08 PM
I'm thinking Considine will be a situational guy next year. I think we'll have a rookie take his starting spot.

either way they are getting rid of a guy because he wants too much money

even tho hes gonna go on the open market and get caked off nicely by any one of a number of teams

who realize that hes all of a sudden not a good football player simply because he got put in a couple bad situations where he had to cover a wide receiver one on one....tell me how many strong safeties in this league could stay with joe horn man up in the open field

this is another case of the eagles having a player who didnt accept their intital offer and probably wants a few more bucks than they are willing to give and once he did that much like rod hood he started to see the field less and less and now will be jettisoned and replaced by an inferior player

This was another case of Michael Lewis sucking. No vendetta against him. He just wasn't any good.

And in case you stopped paying attention. Rod Hood looked like shtein too on more than one occasion afer he came back from his injury.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on February 08, 2007, 02:34:15 PM
Lewis was awful in coverage last season too. I doubt this is a dollar and cents issue more than it is he can't cover worth a damn. A SS needs coverage skills, that doesn't mean he should blanket a WR like a CB does, that means he shouldn't fall for the slightest juke and get burned on a consistent basis.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 08, 2007, 02:45:55 PM
you think mike lewis is the only run defending strong safety in the league that teams 'go after'...a strong safety was hung out to dry by a defensive line that couldnt get near the qb and all of a sudden a former probowler who is now in his prime cant play??....i dont buy it...did he have an off year sure...but if you let go all good players after they have an off or in this case a couple bad games there would be more players in free agency than on teams

bottom line is he absolutely should not have been benched and probably should be resigned unless they have a pretty damn good plan b...because lewis is probably going to be the best safety in free agency...you think its coincidence that the teams run defense collapsed after he started getting benched...hes a good player and if the eagles dont like him as much as someone else they have that can do the job then let him go since he obviously wants too much money....but dont scapegoat him as the problem and then replace him with sean considine
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on February 08, 2007, 02:48:44 PM
Lewis was so far away better for the defense than Considine was, it can't be debated. 

but they'll let him walk, and Considine will probably start next year, and he will continue to get dominated during running plays by pass catching tight ends
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on February 08, 2007, 02:53:53 PM
between Considine and Lewis I have to agree I'd rather have Lewis. 

also, characterizing his suckiness as being only "a couple" games is pretty charitable.  neither of his last two seasons were that good.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 08, 2007, 02:56:45 PM
This was another case of Michael Lewis sucking. No vendetta against him. He just wasn't any good.

please explain this then


lewis > patterson (patterson gets rewarded with a huge contract extension)
lewis > dhani (dhani gets to play four years with the eagles)
lewis > considine (considine gets the starting gig)
lewis > darren howard (howard continues to get lots of snaps)
lewis > darwin walker (see dhani)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on February 08, 2007, 03:05:15 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on February 08, 2007, 02:45:55 PM
you think mike lewis is the only run defending strong safety in the league that teams 'go after'...a strong safety was hung out to dry by a defensive line that couldnt get near the qb and all of a sudden a former probowler who is now in his prime cant play??....i dont buy it...did he have an off year sure...but if you let go all good players after they have an off or in this case a couple bad games there would be more players in free agency than on teams

He didn't just have an 'off year'. His coverage skills have been horrible for some time now. And JJ wanted to retain him as an OLB, but Lewis wasn't having it. He wants to be a SS.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 08, 2007, 03:12:57 PM
he hasnt been horrible for a while...thats the company line...he had a few bad games this year...but that goes for every single player on the defense

anway the free agency is one thing...that can be debated since he may want outrageous money and he isnt worth that...but dont be surprised if he sings with another team and goes right back to his normal very good playing level

the fact is hes the best SS they have by far!! and he never should have been benched for that loser considine

perhaps if lewis plays in those games where they were losing by giving up 250 yards a game rushing then they dont have to play at new orleans in the playoffs....

its a travesty to the rest of the team and the fans to put an inferior player in for someone for reasons other than on the field play
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on February 08, 2007, 03:15:23 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on February 08, 2007, 02:56:45 PM
lewis > patterson (patterson gets rewarded with a huge contract extension)
lewis > dhani (dhani gets to play four years with the eagles)
lewis > considine (considine gets the starting gig)
lewis > darren howard (howard continues to get lots of snaps)
lewis > darwin walker (see dhani)

Patterson, Howard, and Walker are linemen, a position Lewis is incapable of playing.  You can't compare them apples/apples there.  Let's just say Patterson is probably very agreeable at all times and does what's asked, even if unspectacularly.  Walker getting snaps over Bunkley still scares me about Bunkley's future, and Howard had to play a lot because Kearse was injured and McDougle sucks a lot more.

By many accounts, the Eagles wanted Lewis to play more at linebacker, because his coverage skills are somewhat lax and they needed help there.  He balked.  They played Considine because he's a bit better in coverage, but he turned out to be an absolute liability near the line of scrimmage.

Mike Lewis and Sean Taylor are basically the same player, or appeared so this year.  They are incomplete - will make the big play, but will give up just as many big plays.  They lack discipline, but they'll still have their IGY-like fans that fall in love with their athletic ability and don't understand they are mostly uncoachable.

Considine sucks also, though.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on February 08, 2007, 03:20:14 PM
We just see things differently, I guess. I have a Lewis jersey, been a big supporter of his for a long time now. Call it the company line but I know what I see and he's a liability vs. the pass. Considine can't tackle worth a damn but teams weren't scheming their offense to exploit him deep like they were with Lewis. To say he was our best SS by far is a bit of a stretch, he's stellar vs. the run but you can't argue he wasn't as good vs. the pass as Considine was. I'll reserve judgement on his 'worth' until I see what he gets on the open market.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on February 08, 2007, 03:30:26 PM
If the debate is Lewis vs. Considine, why bother?

Neither of them are a complete player and neither should be starting next year.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on February 08, 2007, 03:45:40 PM
Quote from: FFatPatt on February 08, 2007, 03:30:26 PM
If the debate is Lewis vs. Considine, why bother?

Neither of them are a complete player and neither should be starting next year.
The debate is whether Lewis was sat in favor of Considine because he wanted too much money.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Munson on February 08, 2007, 03:51:42 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on February 08, 2007, 08:42:22 AM
your entire argument is based on simply prorating his statistics...sports dont work like that...if you more intelligently based your argument on mcnabbs entire body of work over his career and the way he was playing at the time of his injury you would realize he most likely was not gonna get 30

you probably would be better arguing that he would have beaten his all time non TO career high of 25....thats something you can say he "certainly" would have done

Wrong. If I was "simply" prorating his stats, then I'd be saying he'd have to get 2 TD's every game for the rest of the year with no real trend of that happening throughout the 2006 season, and therefore no statistical evidence that he COULD have thrown 2 TD's a game for the rest of the year. Problem is, the stats show that he had at LEAST 2 paassing touchdowns in every game he played in 2006 except the Jaguars game. So, as you like to say, not throwing for at least 2 TD's in a game for 2006 was the exception, not the trend.

Again, your version of McNabb "going downhill" is that he wasn't scoring early and often like he was during the first half of the season...but he was still getting his 2 passing TD's a game, no matter how bad he/the offense were starting out games. So, even when the offense started "going downhill" in the Saints game, McNabb still threw for 2 TD's, 3 TD's, 0, TD's, and 2 TD's. Just because the Tenn. game started out slow on offense (like the Bucs game and the taterskins game) does not mean they were going to be only the 2nd team in 2006 to hold McNabb under 2 passing TDs in game.

And keep in mind that the rest of the schedule had some fluff ass defenses on it.

Edit-I love when the stats don't agree with what you have to say, because all of a sudden they are somehow flawed. But when they're on your side....they're great aren't they?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 08, 2007, 03:53:16 PM
Patterson, Howard, and Walker are linemen, a position Lewis is incapable of playing.  You can't compare them apples/apples there.

you can compare them in that there were players on the team that played worse than lewis but yet paid nowhere near the consequences and in some cases actually got rewarded

Let's just say Patterson is probably very agreeable at all times and does what's asked, even if unspectacularly. 

and that gets you a big extension?

Walker getting snaps over Bunkley still scares me about Bunkley's future

considine getting snaps over lewis is equally scary

and Howard had to play a lot because Kearse was injured and McDougle sucks a lot more.

howard was on a milk carton from week three on....at the very least why not swap his and juqua thomas' roles...make howard come off the bench like they did with considine lewis

By many accounts, the Eagles wanted Lewis to play more at linebacker because his coverage skills are somewhat lax and they needed help there.  He balked.

this is a valid point....if they asked him to play linebacker and he said no and that pissed them off and they sat him down thats fine...but even if that was the case youre still killing yourself at safety by putting considine in because his coverage skills are somewhat lax and they needed help there.  He balked. 

They played Considine because he's a bit better in coverage, but he turned out to be an absolute liability near the line of scrimmage

considine was much worse as a run stopper than elwis is as a pass protector...and in pass coverage you can at least help a guy by scheming...you can hide from not tackling someone

Mike Lewis and Sean Taylor are basically the same player, or appeared so this year.  They are incomplete - will make the big play, but will give up just as many big plays.  They lack discipline, but they'll still have their IGY-like fans that fall in love with their athletic ability and don't understand they are mostly uncoachable.

taylor is infintely more athletic than lewis...hell considine is more athletic...but i agree they had similar down type years...as did roy williams...yet i didnt see the skins and cowboys bringing in inferior players to replace them


Considine can't tackle worth a damn but teams weren't scheming their offense to exploit him deep like they were with Lewis

i totally disagree....like i said the minute lewis sat down the team started giving up 200+ yards every game...it wasnt until lewis started to play more than they settled that down...then for some unknown reason they didnt play lewis against new orleans in the playoffs


we wont know until the next couple years when we see where lewis ends up and how he plays vs how considine is with the birds....but my money is on the ex probowler...but thats really not where im even trying to go...im talking about this year with the eagles and what happend to lewis...i thought it was a mistake and done for all the wrong reasons
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Munson on February 08, 2007, 03:57:34 PM
Michael Lewis > Sean Considine

If Sean can put on some muscle weight and get stronger, maybe he'd be better...but I don't like the idea of the depending on that.

And IGY, Sean Taylor had a "down" year? Sean Taylor still hasn't had an "up" year, he's OVERRATED, get over it dude. He's not now, and never will be the best safety in the NFL.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhanInDC on February 08, 2007, 03:58:25 PM
Quote from: Munson on February 08, 2007, 03:51:42 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on February 08, 2007, 08:42:22 AM
your entire argument is based on simply prorating his statistics...sports dont work like that...if you more intelligently based your argument on mcnabbs entire body of work over his career and the way he was playing at the time of his injury you would realize he most likely was not gonna get 30

you probably would be better arguing that he would have beaten his all time non TO career high of 25....thats something you can say he "certainly" would have done

Wrong. If I was "simply" prorating his stats, then I'd be saying he'd have to get 2 TD's every game for the rest of the year with no real trend of that happening throughout the 2006 season, and therefore no statistical evidence that he COULD have thrown 2 TD's a game for the rest of the year. Problem is, the stats show that he had at LEAST 2 paassing touchdowns in every game he played in 2006 except the Jaguars game. So, as you like to say, not throwing for at least 2 TD's in a game for 2006 was the exception, not the trend.

Again, your version of McNabb "going downhill" is that he wasn't scoring early and often like he was during the first half of the season...but he was still getting his 2 passing TD's a game, no matter how bad he/the offense were starting out games. So, even when the offense started "going downhill" in the Saints game, McNabb still threw for 2 TD's, 3 TD's, 0, TD's, and 2 TD's. Just because the Tenn. game started out slow on offense (like the Bucs game and the taterskins game) does not mean they were going to be only the 2nd team in 2006 to hold McNabb under 2 passing TDs in game.

And keep in mind that the rest of the schedule had some fluff ass defenses on it.

Edit-I love when the stats don't agree with what you have to say, because all of a sudden they are somehow flawed. But when they're on your side....they're great aren't they?

I think this whole arguement has been beated to death. Let's get off it.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhanInDC on February 08, 2007, 04:02:58 PM
Quote from: Munson on February 08, 2007, 03:57:34 PM
If Sean can put on some muscle weight and get stronger, maybe he'd be better...but I don't like the idea of the depending on that.

This is being pushed all over PE.com. If the dude puts on weight and muscle, he slows down. Stopping the run was never in the guys repertoire. He's a situational cover safety and a STer. In that role, hell, I'd say Considine could be damn good. But he isn't the answer as a full time SS.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 08, 2007, 04:03:43 PM
And IGY, Sean Taylor had a "down" year? Sean Taylor still hasn't had an "up" year, he's OVERRATED, get over it dude


your opinions on the eagles rank just above king coles you think im gonna listen to them on a player you hate from a team you hate
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 08, 2007, 04:05:40 PM
This is being pushed all over PE.com. If the dude puts on weight and muscle, he slows down. Stopping the run was never in the guys repertoire. He's a situational cover safety and a STer. In that role, hell, I'd say Considine could be damn good. But he isn't the answer as a full time SS.

^^^^
on point

this is pretty much verbatim what i said about the guy when he was drafted...and aint a damn thing changed
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on February 08, 2007, 04:06:06 PM
igy, here's what I don't get. If the Eagles wanted to punish players like Hood and Lewis for not accepting their offer, why didn't they do the same to players like Trotter, Simon, Douglas etc. You can't tell me they weren't offered an extension at some point since the Eagles tried to retain them.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Munson on February 08, 2007, 04:09:32 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on February 08, 2007, 04:03:43 PM
And IGY, Sean Taylor had a "down" year? Sean Taylor still hasn't had an "up" year, he's OVERRATED, get over it dude


your opinions on the eagles rank just above king coles you think im gonna listen to them on a player you hate from a team you hate

Dude, I don't even think you know what my "opinions" on the Eagles are. I think you just want to try and label me a homer because I have defended certain players, or have played devils advocate during certain arguments on here. You, like many other of the "I'm too cool for the rest of you internet people", don't like to read entire posts, you like to pick out one certain part and purposely use it out of context. Good job, dude, your opinions are so much better. :yay And what's worse is you throw your opinions around like they are cold hard facts.

Sean Taylor=Best safety in the NFL :-D

So again...Sean Taylor has yet to even have an "up" year, he's OVERRATED, get over it dude. He never was, is not now, and never will be the best safety in the NFL. And as long as Brian Dawkins is still in the league, he won't even be the best safety in his division. Maybe not even the 2nd best. Ov. er. rat. ed.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on February 08, 2007, 04:09:38 PM
I still don't get the big deal.  The team has at least 10 bigger problems than if Lewis stays or goes.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Munson on February 08, 2007, 04:14:52 PM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on February 08, 2007, 04:06:06 PM
igy, here's what I don't get. If the Eagles wanted to punish players like Hood and Lewis for not accepting their offer, why didn't they do the same to players like Trotter, Simon, Douglas etc. You can't tell me they weren't offered an extension at some point since the Eagles tried to retain them.

Because the big bad Eagles FO doesn't want the Eagles to win. It's a conspiracy to protect McNabb, they didn't want the team to win with Garcia at QB and start a QB debate.

Seriously, because the team has way too much faith in Conside's abilities to get the job done, and as for Hood...The Eagles had to know he was gonna go after this year anyway, I can't imagine they expected he'd resign to play a back-up role here. So I don't see any benefits from "punishing" him.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 08, 2007, 04:16:27 PM
If the Eagles wanted to punish players like Hood and Lewis for not accepting their offer, why didn't they do the same to players like Trotter, Simon, Douglas etc.

they punished simon and trotter by tagging them even tho they full well knew they werent bringing them back

douglas they seemed to have a fine relationship with they just werent willing to pay him what he wanted...not every negotiation is going to turn contentious

lewis was easy to scapegoat cause he admittedly had some bad games and specifically a bad play vs new orleans....so in their mind they could get people to tow that company line no problem

hood they had the injury excuse...bench him cause they were pissed at him and when people asked why say his foot is still hurt

every situation is not gonna call for punishment in the form of a benching...and not every situation are the eagles gonna be incorrect in...see mccoy and his benching...they made a great move there...and there have been and will be times when the eagles shouldnt play or resign someone for perfectly valid reasons...but in the case of hood and more so of lewis this year the eagles made retarded decisions for ridiculously petty reasons...and they wonder why so many players sleep with one eye open around them
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 08, 2007, 04:23:01 PM
Dude, I don't even think you know what my "opinions" on the Eagles are. I think you just want to try and label me a homer because I have defended certain players

i can name ten people on this board who defend players but arent homers...then theres more critical people like me who arent haters...and then theres a few people that defend the team at all costs 95% of the time...and one of them is you

youre homertastic dookie and you love it
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on February 08, 2007, 04:31:02 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on February 08, 2007, 04:16:27 PM
If the Eagles wanted to punish players like Hood and Lewis for not accepting their offer, why didn't they do the same to players like Trotter, Simon, Douglas etc.

they punished simon and trotter by tagging them even tho they full well knew they werent bringing them back

douglas they seemed to have a fine relationship with they just werent willing to pay him what he wanted...not every negotiation is going to turn contentious

I only used those 3 playes because they were pretty high profile. But if your theory was correct why wouldn't they have had benched Trotter for Gardner? I don't see how tagging a guy is punishment, their team is saying they're worthy to be paid with the top 5 at their position. Tagging a young Pro Bowl MLB or DT was a smart front office move. Maybe they didn't get anything for either but if Simon had come to terms with the Ravens the Eagles would have received a 2nd and 3rd.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on February 08, 2007, 04:35:56 PM
they couldn't legitimately bench Trotter, Douglas, and Simon because they were at the top of their games.  you can legitimately bench Hood by saying he had a bad week of practice, because he's not a star.  you would never be able to get away with that for any of the three you mentioned.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 08, 2007, 04:36:23 PM
But if your theory was correct why wouldn't they have had benched Trotter for Gardner?

because trotter played excellent that year...better than lewis did this year...they had no out if they did that...or perhaps they thought they were going to resign trotter during the year or knew they were gonna tag him and have him play for the tender....theres many reasons why...like i said im not saying the eagles do what they did to lewis to every player...just to some when the situation arises

I don't see how tagging a guy is punishment

really?

Tagging a young Pro Bowl MLB or DT was a smart front office move

depends on the situation...sometimes it is...but not ever to a player




Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Munson on February 08, 2007, 04:42:24 PM
 :-D That's exactly what I'm talking about. I don't "defend the team at all costs" even 75% of the time, let alone 95. It's just the lot of you come on here spurting some of the most rediculous negative bullshtein I've ever seen during the pre-season, like just spewing shtein from your mouths with NOTHING to back it up but your own opinions, and you hope some of it sticks by the end the season. Some of it does, some of it doesn't. Guys like you will harp all day and all night long about what did stick, and totally ignore what you were wrong about. Or come up with some rediculous reason as to why you really weren't wrong. Like Brian Westbrook's inability to carry the load. Funny how all that talk settled down from week 1 through week 17. We'll just pretend no one ever said he couldn't carry the load. Or,  that groups' defense as to why they really weren't wrong...Oh no! a running back wiht a sore knee missed a game against a team the Eagles should totally own! A running back with a sore knee???? That's unheard of, he MUST be injury prone.

Please show me where I have defended the team all costs 95% of the time.
Please show me where I havn't been critical of the team, certain individuals, coachs, and ownership less then 5% of the time. Please.

You can't. But because I'm not super cool negative like you, I'm a h0mErrrz11!!ooneoneoeneoenejemn!@Bdaefjb ds!

Good call man. :yay

Anyway, who cares if the FO "punished" these guys or not.....Hood wasn't going to come back anyway, and Lewis had one foot out the door with the amount of money he was asking for. Now they're both gone, and the Eagles have yet another hole to fill on defense at SS. The problem is they're going to try and plug this hole with a piece of bubble gum. So lets worry about that one and hope to god the Eagles draft/sign a SS or Considine steals some of Dawk's DNA.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on February 08, 2007, 04:44:01 PM
I'd rather go into next season with Lewis starting at SS than Walker and/or Patterson starting at DT.

Same with Dhani starting at SAM. I'd rather have Lewis starting at SS.

Lewis is down the bottom of the line with the defensive problems. It starts with the front seven.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 08, 2007, 04:44:34 PM
calm down

and stop calling me man and dood
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Wingspan on February 08, 2007, 04:45:37 PM
I still say they should find a new FS. Then move Dawkins to the SS spot, where speed isn't as necessary. Moving Dawkins over to the SS spot could extend his high level of play for a few seasons more.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on February 08, 2007, 04:46:21 PM
I guess I don't see the Eagles as being that devious or smart to devise such a plan.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on February 08, 2007, 04:47:57 PM
they were clever enough to extend Mike Patterson, don't put anything past them
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on February 08, 2007, 04:48:19 PM
Quote from: Wingspan on February 08, 2007, 04:45:37 PM
I still say they should find a new FS. Then move Dawkins to the SS spot, where speed isn't as necessary. Moving Dawkins over to the SS spot could extend his high level of play for a few seasons more.


I disagree. SS is more grueling physically than FS is.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Wingspan on February 08, 2007, 04:51:32 PM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on February 08, 2007, 04:48:19 PM
Quote from: Wingspan on February 08, 2007, 04:45:37 PM
I still say they should find a new FS. Then move Dawkins to the SS spot, where speed isn't as necessary. Moving Dawkins over to the SS spot could extend his high level of play for a few seasons more.


I disagree. SS is more grueling physically than FS is.

What difference would that make? If anything, Dawkins stays in great shape all season. But he has lost some speed, he would fit right into the SS spot.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 08, 2007, 04:51:51 PM
i dont think its as deep as a plan

i think the players pissed them off they had an opening to get back at them and did so...they are stubborn bastiches same way as when they negotiate with free agents and the player doesnt immediately accept their offer thats it its over get out of here

who knows maybe lewis does suck worse than considine and he will get no play on the open amrket and wherever he goes he will play like he did against new orleans this year and not like he has over the last four years
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Munson on February 08, 2007, 04:52:23 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on February 08, 2007, 04:44:34 PM
calm down

and stop calling me man and dood

I am calm, man. But I'm very tired and when I'm tired I will talk/type/rant for very long periods of time about whatever the farg I feel like. And you will shut the farg up and listen, you giant pile of used douche bags. Dude.

If I'm what's considered a "homer", then I'd swear to god 80% of this MB aren't even Eagles fans.

Wingspan-I like that idea, especially considering that Considine would probably make ab etter FS then he would a SS....but I don't really know if that would extend Dawk's high level of play a few years. I would think at SS that he would take more of a pounding on his body, and therefore age a little bit faster, no?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 08, 2007, 04:53:21 PM
I disagree. SS is more grueling physically than FS is.

i think wing is saying that with dawkins aging and losing a step or two those steps wont be as apparent at the ss position
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on February 08, 2007, 04:55:44 PM
Quote from: Wingspan on February 08, 2007, 04:51:32 PM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on February 08, 2007, 04:48:19 PM
Quote from: Wingspan on February 08, 2007, 04:45:37 PM
I still say they should find a new FS. Then move Dawkins to the SS spot, where speed isn't as necessary. Moving Dawkins over to the SS spot could extend his high level of play for a few seasons more.


I disagree. SS is more grueling physically than FS is.

What difference would that make? If anything, Dawkins stays in great shape all season. But he has lost some speed, he would fit right into the SS spot.
A SS sticks his nose into the mix on running downs, a FS generally stays back as a last line of defense. Dawks range isn't what it once was but its still great. I'm not saying he would do bad at SS just saying it won't prolong his career.

Quote from: ice grillin you on February 08, 2007, 04:51:51 PM
i dont think its as deep as a plan

i think the players pissed them off they had an opening to get back at them and did so...they are stubborn bastiches same way as when they negotiate with free agents and the player doesnt immediately accept their offer thats it its over get out of here
I'm not saying the f/o doesn't get pissed when a player declines a contract, just that I doubt they punish players by taking away playing time.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Munson on February 08, 2007, 04:57:48 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on February 08, 2007, 04:53:21 PM
I disagree. SS is more grueling physically than FS is.

i think wing is saying that with dawkins aging and losing a step or two those steps wont be as apparent at the ss position

True...but I'd rather him stick at FS with that lost step and still be pretty dominating for at least another 2 years then stick him at SS and have his body break down by the end of that 2 years.

Dawk takes good care of his body and I think, at least at FS, the Eagles still have another good 3 years out of him. At SS....I don't think he could take that much of a pounding for longer then another year and a half before his body starts to break down.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Wingspan on February 08, 2007, 04:58:49 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on February 08, 2007, 04:53:21 PM
I disagree. SS is more grueling physically than FS is.

i think wing is saying that with dawkins aging and losing a step or two those steps wont be as apparent at the ss position

Pretty much
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on February 08, 2007, 05:03:27 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on February 08, 2007, 04:44:34 PMand stop calling me man and dood

lmao
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on February 08, 2007, 05:05:34 PM
IGY is a woman?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on February 08, 2007, 05:06:45 PM
an uppity Negress, actually
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on February 08, 2007, 05:19:49 PM
take your farging warfish turn munson
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on February 08, 2007, 05:42:15 PM
Quote from: Diomedes on February 08, 2007, 05:06:45 PM
an uppity Negress, actually

You, sir, are on FIRE today.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Munson on February 08, 2007, 09:01:35 PM
Quote from: SunMo on February 08, 2007, 05:19:49 PM
take your farging warfish turn munson
Tounge my grundle for me, first.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on February 08, 2007, 09:24:36 PM
QuoteGRUDEN EYEING RETURN TO PHILLY?

There's persistent talk in league circles that Bucs coach Jon Gruden is hoping to become the head coach of the Eagles if/when Andy Reid packs it in.

And given the current travails of Reid's sons, which are prompting all sorts of speculation that Reid might call it quits, Gruden's opportunity could come sooner rather than later.

But let's be clear.  We're not reporting that Reid is out, or that if he's out Gruden is in.  All we're saying is that the talk in league circles is that Gruden wants the job, if/when the job comes open.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 08, 2007, 09:27:13 PM
please allah
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Magical_Retard on February 08, 2007, 09:49:17 PM
oh god if reid leaves i do not want gruden here.

anyway did anyone hear this? some rumor on fox sports about mcnabb and to hugging and making up at some super bowl party?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Munson on February 08, 2007, 09:51:56 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on February 08, 2007, 09:27:13 PM
please allah

Says the guy who uses the fact that Reid took over the team of another Coach in order to have his great defense as a way to attack Reid.

Not like Gruden ever did that or anything. And even if he did, he's had so much success elsewhere. :D

I'll take neither for 1 Super Bowl, please.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on February 08, 2007, 09:54:49 PM
Gruden = massively overrated

Stay away "Chucky". Keep your novelty hard-core stare downs in Tampa.

As for the Lewis v. Considine debate...

I used to be a big time Lewis fan. But there is no question that he was terrible in 2005 and 2006. Did the Pro Bowl berth in 2004 go to his head? Did he see $$ signs in his eyes because of that and thus his play suffered? One of the guys a few of us know on the EMB sat next to Lewis' brother (who is also his agent) on the way to the SB and he talked about how much money Lewis wanted.

If you could fuse Considine's coverage with Lewis' run stopping ability you'd have a perfect SS. But its pick your poison. They need to draft a safety.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on February 08, 2007, 10:03:27 PM
If Reid did step down I think Gruden would be a great option. He has a Superbowl under his belt and took a 4-12 Raiders team and built them into SB contenders. The Bucs traded away two 1sts and two 2nds to get him so its not like he's gotten a lot of help in the draft. Plus, it's not like we're getting Cowher.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on February 08, 2007, 10:06:45 PM
Gruden's version of the WCO is maddening to watch. Tampa fans want him gone because of his continual call of routes short of the sticks, too much pre-snap motion and things like that. They rarely throw deep. He does like to run the ball though. And I'm sure that is what people would focus on. But they sucked last year and those are with his players. HIm and Bruce Allen.

Not a fan at all.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 08, 2007, 10:08:35 PM
im trying to think what the bigger mismatch is

gruden over reid as a coach

or lewis over considine as a safety


probably gruden over reid....neither reid nor considine has any business doing what they do in the nfl...but reid has at least accomplished something where as considine is just pure garbage
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Wingspan on February 08, 2007, 10:09:22 PM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on February 08, 2007, 10:03:27 PM
If Reid did step down I think Gruden would be a great option. He has a Superbowl under his belt and took a 4-12 Raiders team and built them into SB contenders. The Bucs traded away two 1sts and two 2nds to get him so its not like he's gotten a lot of help in the draft. Plus, it's not like we're getting Cowher.

And then he took a Super Bowl team to a 4-12 record.

Gruden? No farging thanks.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on February 08, 2007, 10:10:46 PM
He inherited an old QB and no draft picks. Maybe if he had a guy who could throw the ball downfield and balanced that with a solid running game they'd be more effective. He doesn't have much talent on offense to work with, which partly explains the extra pre-snap motion. Here's a good question: Would you want Monte Kiffin as our DC?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 08, 2007, 10:12:28 PM
gruden has absolutely urinated on reid when theyve faced each as well
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on February 08, 2007, 10:12:49 PM
Quote from: Wingspan on February 08, 2007, 10:09:22 PM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on February 08, 2007, 10:03:27 PM
If Reid did step down I think Gruden would be a great option. He has a Superbowl under his belt and took a 4-12 Raiders team and built them into SB contenders. The Bucs traded away two 1sts and two 2nds to get him so its not like he's gotten a lot of help in the draft. Plus, it's not like we're getting Cowher.

And then he took a Super Bowl team to a 4-12 record.

Gruden? No farging thanks.

Sort of like what Cowher did with the Steelers this season, are you telling me you wouldn't want him as coach?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 08, 2007, 10:14:33 PM
Sort of like what Cowher did with the Steelers this season, are you telling me you wouldn't want him as coach?

no way....who would want a coach that has won a superbowl and is a huge upgrade over what the eagles have....would he be choice #1 not necessarily...but there would haver to be someone pretty damn good out there to not take gruden over reid
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Wingspan on February 08, 2007, 10:15:04 PM
I would take anyone as DC, I wanted Jim Johnson gone this year.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Wingspan on February 08, 2007, 10:23:17 PM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on February 08, 2007, 10:12:49 PM
Sort of like what Cowher did with the Steelers this season, are you telling me you wouldn't want him as coach?

That was a fun way to twist that. Jon Gruden is no Bill Cowher.

Besides, Cowher did lose 4 AFC Championship games at home, and a superbowl in his 1st 13 years as coach.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on February 08, 2007, 10:25:17 PM
Just because a guy won a SB doesn't mean he's king shtein.

Gruden is overrated.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on February 08, 2007, 10:44:24 PM
Quote from: Wingspan on February 08, 2007, 10:23:17 PM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on February 08, 2007, 10:12:49 PM
Sort of like what Cowher did with the Steelers this season, are you telling me you wouldn't want him as coach?

That was a fun way to twist that. Jon Gruden is no Bill Cowher.

Besides, Cowher did lose 4 AFC Championship games at home, and a superbowl in his 1st 13 years as coach.
Gruden is no Cowher, but he built a crappy Raiders team and took them to the conference finals. And lets be honest, if he's their coach the following season they're still in the SB and might have actually won it.
If Reid were to step down tomorrow - which is the scenario we're imagining - who's out there you'd rather have? (Cowher is not an acceptable answer)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on February 08, 2007, 10:47:14 PM
Gruden isn't available either. And its kind of late in the game to be getting a new coach. The Eagles would most likely have to give up something to get him and I don't wanna do that. Especially for Gruden.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on February 08, 2007, 10:49:24 PM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on February 08, 2007, 10:47:14 PM
Gruden isn't available either. And its kind of late in the game to be getting a new coach. The Eagles would most likely have to give up something to get him and I don't wanna do that. Especially for Gruden.
This is an unlikely scenario but the original post that started this conversation was if Reid were to step down than Gruden would be interested. Which begs the question, if not Gruden than who? Only person out there I can think of is Rivera, and he hasn't gotten much consideration outside of Dallas (which somewhat baffles me)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on February 08, 2007, 10:50:40 PM
I'd go with Rivera.

But if AR only steps aside until this situation with his punk kids is over, he'll be back and we'll see an interim HC. Morningwood or Johnson.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: bobbyinlondon on February 08, 2007, 11:12:44 PM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on February 08, 2007, 10:49:24 PM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on February 08, 2007, 10:47:14 PM
Gruden isn't available either. And its kind of late in the game to be getting a new coach. The Eagles would most likely have to give up something to get him and I don't wanna do that. Especially for Gruden.
This is an unlikely scenario but the original post that started this conversation was if Reid were to step down than Gruden would be interested. Which begs the question, if not Gruden than who? Only person out there I can think of is Rivera, and he hasn't gotten much consideration outside of Dallas (which somewhat baffles me)



I think some of you guys live in a dream world.

First, Gruden would have to resign from the Bucs.

Second, I'm sure after the way the Bucs got him from the Raiders, they would have put some language in his contract like he wouldn't be allowed to coach another NFL or NFC team for at least a year or two if he should resign.

Third, if a Gruden with no SBs on his resume cost the Bucs 2 1sts, 2nds and 8M in cash, what do you think a coach WITH a SB would cost the Eagles if the Bucs wouldn't accept his resignation?

Fourth--nothing is guaranteed and some of you guys are talking like all he has to do is show up and he'd lead the Eagles to a SB win. There are a lot of things that have to happen for a team to win a SB--good health in key areas, consistent play, good drafting, solid decision-making when signing FAs, and some luck.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Munson on February 08, 2007, 11:33:35 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on February 08, 2007, 10:14:33 PM
Sort of like what Cowher did with the Steelers this season, are you telling me you wouldn't want him as coach?

no way....who would want a coach that has won a superbowl and is a huge upgrade over what the eagles have....would he be choice #1 not necessarily...but there would haver to be someone pretty damn good out there to not take gruden over reid

Again, you're praising a guy for doing the exact same thing that Andy Reid did, which you bash him for....Gruden took over a team with a much better defense then what Andy got from Ray Rhodes, and a much better offense, and was able to get a Super Bowl out of it....So Gruden is great and Reid just inherited a good defense? Besides the Super Bowl he used Tony Dungy's team for...what has Gruden done that Reid hasn't?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: General_Failure on February 08, 2007, 11:52:03 PM
Blamed his players openly.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 09, 2007, 06:32:02 AM
what has Gruden done that Reid hasn't?

beaten reids ass four out of the five times theyve gone head to head...including the infamous last game ever at the vet...including games where both teams were good AND when grudens team sucked and reids

won a superbowl...in fact gruden is so good he took a team to the superbowl that another guy who just won a superbowl couldnt...and then in that superbowl he played against his own team in the raiders...he played HIMSELF in the superbowl!!!...reid never done that...he went up against a coach that knew him better than anyone else in the world and he came out on top

anyone that would even try to defend reid over gruden is so far up the eagles behinds its not even funny...sometimes you guys are pure comedy....

lol @ phreak rather having rivera than gruden
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: General_Failure on February 09, 2007, 07:38:37 AM
Gruden's a joke. You can try to shine that turd, but he still gets credit for taking Dungy's defense to the superbowl and then dismantling the entire franchise while blaming others.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 09, 2007, 07:56:24 AM
fine hes a terrible coach...then what does that make andy....i cant imagine what you think about him if you think gruden is a turd

i find it funny that dungy used to get killed for not being able to win with the bucs....and now gruden gets killed for only winning because he had dungys team
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: General_Failure on February 09, 2007, 08:10:18 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on February 09, 2007, 07:56:24 AM
fine hes a terrible coach...then what does that make andy

A really bad coach who gets beaten by a terrible coach every single time.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 09, 2007, 08:14:36 AM
makes sense
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on February 09, 2007, 09:04:12 AM
I just don't like Gruden or the way he runs his offense. I've felt he was terribly overrated because he's "fiery" and makes those faces that the cameras just love to catch.

So what if he's beaten Reid? The majority of those losses to TB were because of Monte Kiffin's defense and that little bastich Ronde Barber.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on February 09, 2007, 09:08:11 AM
Monte Kiffin > Jim Johnson with teh bigness.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on February 09, 2007, 09:16:22 AM
so he doesn't get credit for taking Dungy's team to the Super Bowl, but he also doesn't get credit for the Raiders team that he played in the Super Bowl?  makes sense.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 09, 2007, 09:17:50 AM
lol...now gruden sucks because he makes faces

and now not only does he get no credit because he wone with dungys team but the only reason they even  won then is because of kiffin...even tho kiffin was the DC under dungy who couldnt win a superbowl

this is all very confusing

i guess dungy is one of the worst coaches in the league since he couldnt even win a superbowl with the great monte kiffin

im beginning to wonder if there are any good coaches in the league besides andy reid


Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 09, 2007, 09:21:15 AM
so he doesn't get credit for taking Dungy's team to the Super Bowl, but he also doesn't get credit for the Raiders team that he played in the Super Bowl? 

whats most amazing is that he doesnt get credit for the bucs a team that dungy got blasted for for not being able to go to the superbowl with

basically dungy is a choking dog gruden is a bum and monte kiffin is the best coach ever
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on February 09, 2007, 09:21:23 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on February 09, 2007, 09:17:50 AM
im beginning to wonder if there are any good coaches in the league besides andy reid

Nope.  He's the bestestest.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on February 09, 2007, 09:22:10 AM
Quote from: FFatPatt on February 09, 2007, 09:21:23 AM
Nope.  He's the bestestest.

bestestest coach....AND parent
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on February 09, 2007, 10:25:11 AM
So let me get this straight, there are people who would rather have Andy Reid than Gruden as a coach?

The same Gruden who built a superbowl team in Oakland? The same Gruden who took Rich farging Gannon and turned him into a probowler? The same Gruden who took a team who couldn't get over the hump (sound familiar?) and led them to a superbowl championship? The same Gruden who has out-coached the very same coach that you're all defending nearly every time they've ever faced off?

You people get dumber by the farging second.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on February 09, 2007, 10:31:33 AM
There aren't many people I wouldn't take over Reid.  I'm not a Gruden fan, but I'd swap him in without hesitation if I could.  Reid needs to go coach in the football league where character counts instead of talent, where timeouts come in baker's dozens, where the system is more important than the players..BYU for instance.  And never come back to the Eagles.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: General_Failure on February 09, 2007, 10:31:54 AM
Kiffin also gets too much credit. McKay gave him some nice players, and they played well in his system. Gruden and McKay brought in a QB and a WR to put an offense on the field that didn't consist of just Dunn and Alstott. Just like the Eagles, they beat up some crappy NFC teams and made it into the playoffs. Once he got into the playoffs, Gruden beat a coach he'd worked with in Green Bay. Then he beat a team he knew better than anyone in the superbowl. Good for him.

Since then, he's done nothing good. Players gone. Replacements for them not found. GM chased out of town. Not in that order. And of course, Gruden's famous "blame player Z when things go wrong" technique.

NFC's still weak. So are the Bucs. Hail Gruden.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 09, 2007, 10:36:41 AM
There aren't many people I wouldn't take over Reid.  I'm not a Gruden fan, but I'd swap him in without hesitation if I could.  Reid needs to go coach in the football league where character counts instead of talent, where timeouts come in baker's dozens, where the system is more important than the players..BYU for instance.  And never come back to the Eagles.

exactly....thats all anyone is saying
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on February 09, 2007, 10:38:23 AM
Quote from: General_Failure on February 09, 2007, 10:31:54 AMAnd of course, Gruden's famous "blame player Z when things go wrong" technique.

Speaking of which, I'd like to comment that the jury has reported back on Gruden v. Keyshawn and found in favor of Keyshawn.

Still productive as hell, still loved by his teamates, still blocking better than most tight ends.  Gruden, still losing and making funny faces.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 09, 2007, 10:45:09 AM
keyshawn has produced but i wouldnt call him a winner over anyone

tampa got rid of keyshawn made playoffs

dallas made playoffs got keyshawn then missed playoffs then got rid of keyshawn and made playoffs

carolina made nfc championship got keyshawn and missed playoffs
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on February 09, 2007, 10:47:15 AM
take your reasoning and shove it

I luv me sum Keyshawn
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 09, 2007, 10:58:47 AM
as do i

keyshawn - irvin - deion - 

gimme all the ish talkers...all teams needs players like that...gives you that extra attitude and confidence that puts you over the top...its exactly what TO gave the eagles in 04...too bad hes the ultimate worst teammate to go along with all his positives
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on February 09, 2007, 11:03:48 AM
I'd also just point out that, though what you said above is true, it does not follow that Keyshawn was why each team failed to make the playoffs (or without him, made them in the case of Dallas).  He was a bright spot for each of those teams, not a problem.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on February 09, 2007, 12:13:04 PM
Donnie Edwards is gonna get show the door in march, I'd love for the birds to get him. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Munson on February 09, 2007, 12:15:57 PM
Quote from: SunMo on February 09, 2007, 09:16:22 AM
so he doesn't get credit for taking Dungy's team to the Super Bowl, but he also doesn't get credit for the Raiders team that he played in the Super Bowl?  makes sense.



Uhh, the same Raiders team that had the Eagles made the Super Bowl, they would have CRUSHED?

Dude, IGY has bashed Andy Reid for getting credit for taking over a team with a great defense and making them a Super Bowl contender. John Gruden, who IGY is parading as the 2nd coming, did the EXACT SAME THING, but actually inherited a BETTER defense then what Reid got, on top of a better offense, and won the Super Bowl with them. Since then, and before that, WHAT IN THE HELL HAS HE ACCOMPLISHED THAT ANDY REID HASN'T?

Absolutely nothing.

RJS, I'm not saying I'll take Reid over Gruden. I'm saying I'll take neither.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 09, 2007, 12:33:55 PM
John Gruden, who IGY is parading as the 2nd coming

link?...if you can find one comment ive made where i even said he was a great coach ill never post here again...but alas you wont be able to...youre slowly drifting from homertastic idiot to parody poster
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on February 09, 2007, 12:39:32 PM
IGY doesn't believe in the first coming, let alone the 2nd.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on February 09, 2007, 12:40:15 PM
Munson's logic is so twisted and convoluted that it's hard to even follow sometimes
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on February 09, 2007, 12:40:37 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on February 09, 2007, 12:33:55 PM
John Gruden, who IGY is parading as the 2nd coming

link?...if you can find one comment ive made where i even said he was a great coach ill never post here again...but alas you wont be able to...youre slowly drifting from homertastic idiot to parody poster
I'm a little confused with that myself, the hypothetical scenario posted was that if Reid stepped down than Gruden would be interested. No one is saying Gruden is 'the 2nd coming', what his supporters on this board are saying is that he's not a 'bad' coach as has been said. The guy has great credentials, is familiar with the city, runs a similar offense, and if Reid were to step down I think we'd be extremely lucky to get a guy like him in here.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on February 09, 2007, 01:55:26 PM
I think Gruden can coach a game, and has come up big in big situations
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on February 09, 2007, 02:01:21 PM
Quote from: Seabiscuit36 on February 09, 2007, 01:55:26 PM
I think Gruden can coach a game, and has come up big in big situations

Ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding!

Winner.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on February 09, 2007, 02:08:50 PM
ding
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: mussa on February 09, 2007, 02:22:07 PM
hell id take art shell at this point
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on February 09, 2007, 02:23:29 PM
That's the most idiotic Eagles-related thing you've ever posted by far.  Art Shell is horrendous.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: mussa on February 09, 2007, 02:26:22 PM
Quote from: FFatPatt on February 09, 2007, 02:23:29 PM
That's the most idiotic Eagles-related thing you've ever posted by far.  Art Shell is horrendous.

mr. obvious ladies and gentleman
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 09, 2007, 02:26:37 PM
hyperbole to prove a point

but yeah reid>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>shell
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on February 09, 2007, 02:29:08 PM
ha, Mussa just kicked FF's ass
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 09, 2007, 02:31:08 PM
he can get in line for his prize
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on February 09, 2007, 02:38:45 PM
mussa's number can be 4,728.  Number 7 is next.


Hyperbole is overused on this board to the point of being completely ineffectual and unfunny.  It's a notch below gay jokes and soundly defeated by AIDS, z-OMG, and !&*!@%!4!1.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 09, 2007, 02:40:20 PM
so how many > before you enter hyperboletown
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on February 09, 2007, 02:41:19 PM
34.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on February 09, 2007, 02:56:36 PM
Quote from: FFatPatt on February 09, 2007, 02:38:45 PM...a notch below gay jokes and soundly defeated by AIDS, z-OMG, and !&*!@%!4.

I'm making a one man play to have "whoop there it is" entered amongst the ranks of these time honored cliches...all in your honor FascistFascist.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on February 09, 2007, 03:04:22 PM
It's actually WHOOMP, and yes.

P.S.  I heart my new pet name.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Wingspan on February 09, 2007, 03:20:24 PM
Where do Doi's bolded pet names fall into the ineffective overused cliches?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Beermonkey on February 09, 2007, 03:22:43 PM
Quote from: FFatPatt on February 09, 2007, 02:38:45 PMHyperbole is overused on this board to the point of being completely ineffectual and unfunny.  It's a notch below gay jokes and soundly defeated by AIDS, z-OMG, and !&*!@%!4.


Add in "stangle me", "burn me", "stab me" & "launch xxxxx into the sun", 95% of our arsenal is gone, leaving only some unfunny references to ball gags & fleshlights.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 09, 2007, 03:23:37 PM
Where do Doi's bolded pet names fall into the ineffective overused cliches?

probably number 1 is anyone actually knew why he does it
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on February 09, 2007, 03:25:13 PM
There is no rhyme or reason that i've found.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on February 09, 2007, 03:32:48 PM
Quote from: Beermonkey on February 09, 2007, 03:22:43 PM
Quote from: FFatPatt on February 09, 2007, 02:38:45 PMHyperbole is overused on this board to the point of being completely ineffectual and unfunny.  It's a notch below gay jokes and soundly defeated by AIDS, z-OMG, and !&*!@%!4.


Add in "stangle me", "burn me", "stab me" & "launch xxxxx into the sun", 95% of our arsenal is gone, leaving only some unfunny references to ball gags & fleshlights.

We always have "dogs licking peanut butter off testicals" jokes to fall back on. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on February 09, 2007, 03:35:32 PM
Quote from: Beermonkey on February 09, 2007, 03:22:43 PM
Quote from: FFatPatt on February 09, 2007, 02:38:45 PMHyperbole is overused on this board to the point of being completely ineffectual and unfunny.  It's a notch below gay jokes and soundly defeated by AIDS, z-OMG, and !&*!@%!4.


Add in "stangle me", "burn me", "stab me" & "launch xxxxx into the sun", 95% of our arsenal is gone, leaving only some unfunny references to ball gags & fleshlights.

Sounds like Beermonkey is not a fan of any of the lingo I've enriched your lives with. That makes me sad. Irately sad. And horny.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on February 09, 2007, 03:56:19 PM
Quote from: rjs246 on February 09, 2007, 03:35:32 PM
Beermonkey ... makes me ... horny.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on February 09, 2007, 04:00:10 PM
i don't just do AIDS jokes, i try to present them in a creative, different way each time. 

and i'm going to hell.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Wingspan on February 09, 2007, 04:03:26 PM
Quote from: SunMo on February 09, 2007, 04:00:10 PM
i don't just do AIDS jokes, i try to present them in a creative, different way each time. 

and i'm going to hell.



I shamefully admit to laughing at the recent AIDS tree one.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: mussa on February 09, 2007, 05:10:10 PM
shut the hell up, all of you
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on February 09, 2007, 07:31:41 PM
no.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on February 12, 2007, 04:51:43 PM
a few times, people have posted where the Eagles have ranked in actual salary spending over the past few years.  i can't seem to find it though, so if whomever knows where it is, can find it and post it, i would appreciate it.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on February 12, 2007, 10:18:06 PM
Looks like our new SAM LB is available. The Giants cut Carlos Emmons according to PFT.com.

Cheap? Check
Injury-prone? Check
Knows the system? Check


Carlos Emmons welcome back to Philly.

Oh yeah, and Arrington and Petitgout were also cut.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on February 12, 2007, 10:19:37 PM
I'm still waiting for Arrington & Trotter to play on the same field for the Eagles.

The meltdown that would ensue from G_F would be worth it.

:-D
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on February 12, 2007, 10:22:10 PM
This probably means the Giants will end up drafting OLB in the first round. Probably Posluszny. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: General_Failure on February 12, 2007, 11:21:30 PM
Quote from: Jerome99RIP on February 12, 2007, 10:19:37 PM
I'm still waiting for Arrington & Trotter to play on the same field for the Eagles.

The meltdown that would ensue from G_F would be worth it.

:-D

I'll patiently wait with a bag of popcorn for the first time they run into each other trying to chase down a reverse.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Beermonkey on February 12, 2007, 11:34:10 PM
Quote from: SunMo on February 12, 2007, 04:51:43 PM
a few times, people have posted where the Eagles have ranked in actual salary spending over the past few years.  i can't seem to find it though, so if whomever knows where it is, can find it and post it, i would appreciate it.

You can find most of the info for 2004 & 2005 here, but you have to do the ranking yourself: NFLPA Research Documents (http://www.nflpa.org/Resources/ResearchDocuments.aspx)

I think about 3 years ago, they were 2nd in overall salary expenditure, which was based on the NFLPA data.

At a quick glance, 2005 looks like they're towards the bottom 3rd ($73.1 million) for all players & well below the average payout of $82.5 million.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Wingspan on February 16, 2007, 04:40:15 PM
Dumb Stat:
Reno Mahe and Ryan Moats were the only 2 skill position players last season to not score a TD
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on February 16, 2007, 05:08:34 PM
If Mahe ran anything faster than a 6.2 40m, Moats would be the only one.  Of course, if Moats was able to outsmart a slab of concrete he probably would have scored one too.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Eagles 3x on February 16, 2007, 08:31:57 PM
Quote from: EagleFeva on February 16, 2007, 05:08:34 PM
If Mahe ran anything faster than a 6.2 40m, Moats would be the only one.  Of course, if Moats was able to outsmart a slab of concrete he probably would have scored one too.
Now thats funny.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MDS on February 19, 2007, 10:29:37 PM
Just for the purposes of Eagles discussion, Ron Rivera was let go by the Bears. Jim Johnson is a cooked. Rivera is quite smart. Hint. Hint.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MadMarchHare on February 19, 2007, 10:32:51 PM
JJ's OK.  But that Kotit...I mean Reid guy seems pretty pre-occupied.  Let's replace him.  Please?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MDS on February 19, 2007, 10:42:24 PM
Son of a bitch. He signed to be the Chargers LB coach so he could improve his head coach stock with some 3-4 defense experience. It's probably a 1 year deal, but conversly, worth it if the Eagles would've been interested.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Butchers Bill on February 22, 2007, 02:30:32 PM
So I'm bored to death at work, and click on my cnnsi link and see a story entitled "Famous Pre-Draft Tales" and immediately think, please don't let Mamula be the first one they talk about.


Sure 'nuff (http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/multimedia/photo_gallery/0702/gallery.nfl.draftcombine/content.1.html)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on February 22, 2007, 02:49:40 PM
Quote from: Butchers Bill on February 22, 2007, 02:30:32 PM
So I'm bored to death at work, and click on my cnnsi link and see a story entitled "Famous Pre-Draft Tales" and immediately think, please don't let Mamula be the first one they talk about.


Sure 'nuff (http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/multimedia/photo_gallery/0702/gallery.nfl.draftcombine/content.1.html)

Worst issue of PLAYGIRL ever? (http://i.a.cnn.net./si/multimedia/photo_gallery/0702/gallery.nfl.draftcombine/images/Mandarich_890424.jpg)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MURP on February 23, 2007, 01:23:38 PM
ha.  best EVER!!!!!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: shorebird on February 23, 2007, 09:21:34 PM
Worst ever pick by the Packers. 'specially after Reggie got done with himl.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on February 24, 2007, 10:01:00 AM
Mandarich's downfall was having to get off the juice. He would have been a great player in the NFL if roids were legal. Too bad.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on February 24, 2007, 12:50:59 PM
Brookover:

QuoteThere are strong indications that the team will re-sign defensive end Juqua Thomas, who had six sacks and became an integral part of the defensive line last season.

"I believe they're going to get the first opportunity to bring him back," said Kennard McGuire, the agent who represents Thomas. "He obviously enjoys being in Philadelphia, and I believe it's a mutual feeling."

Thomas, who had only five career sacks before last season, cannot sign with the Eagles until the free-agent market opens because he played last season under one of the league's minimum salary benefit deals. That means the hit on the team's salary cap was less than his actual salary.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: General_Failure on February 24, 2007, 01:18:26 PM
$25 mil, 6 year deal!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on February 24, 2007, 01:24:20 PM
He has two first names.  That deal will be through 2015 at least...
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on February 24, 2007, 03:00:58 PM
Well to be fair, Juqua isn't a real first name.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: General_Failure on February 24, 2007, 04:40:34 PM
McNabb has two last names. I wonder if that's worth twice as much as two first names to Reid.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on February 24, 2007, 04:45:30 PM
Quote from: General_Failure on February 24, 2007, 01:18:26 PM
$25 mil, 6 year deal!

Really?  That's fantastic!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on February 24, 2007, 05:22:38 PM
Quote from: Diomedes on February 24, 2007, 04:45:30 PM
Quote from: General_Failure on February 24, 2007, 01:18:26 PM
$25 mil, 6 year deal!

Really?  That's fantastic!

Are you really believing anything posted by GF? 

I checked the Eagles website and ESPN and didn't see anything. 


Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: General_Failure on February 24, 2007, 06:00:39 PM
Check PFT. I'm sure you'll see it there soon.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on February 24, 2007, 06:03:46 PM
I are gullible.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 24, 2007, 06:14:41 PM
you were happy that juqua thomas got 25 million and who knows what kind of ridiculous sb?...the guy is as vanilla a player as you can get
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyandBCEagles on February 24, 2007, 06:50:09 PM
We're giving Juqua Thomas $4 mil+ a year and won't shell out to keep Stallworth????

Un freaking believable
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on February 24, 2007, 08:11:32 PM
Quote from: PhillyandBCEagles on February 24, 2007, 06:50:09 PM
Un freaking believable

Sure is.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on February 24, 2007, 10:58:58 PM
Juqua was a bright spot last year.  I'd be happy to see the Eagles keep him.  I'm assuming McDougle will be cut.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MDS on February 25, 2007, 01:05:45 AM
Sad reality of value. Eagles completley overvalue the defensive line. See contracts for Kearse and Howard, now Thomas, and first round picks on the likes of Simon, McDougle, Bunkley and Patterson.

They couldn't care less about wide out. One (late) first rounder, Frederick Mitchell, and one marginal big money signing (big name, but underpaid given production) in Owens. Otherwise, we know...Charles Johnson, Torrence Small, Todd Pinkston, Greg Lewis, Antonio Freeman, Wilbur, James Thrash. It looks like they've finally hit on Reggie Brown.

Great.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on February 25, 2007, 01:08:50 PM
You people are idiots.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on February 25, 2007, 01:14:22 PM
Well, I can't argue with you there.  I don't really know what value would be fair for Juqua, but I like him.  25 mil over six years doesn't sound that bad, unless that figure excludes a signing bonus.

Of course, it was just a joke that I took for serious, so I'm a double fool.   
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 25, 2007, 03:19:41 PM
thomas is a nice depth guy to have along the line and i like him but hes the kinda guy that you can let go and not worry...if he comes back for low money then id welcome him with open arms...but its sad that the eagles are probably going to overpay for him but not stallworth
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on February 25, 2007, 03:23:31 PM
THE ONLY THING WE "KNOW" IS THAT THERE IS MUTUAL INTEREST IN BRINGING HIM BACK TO THE TEAM.  ALL THE SPECULATION ABOUT THE AMOUNTS/YEARS ON THE CONTRACT HAVE BEEN LAME ATTEMPTS AT HUMOR - ATTEMPTS BEING VALIDATED BY MORONS TAKING THEM REMOTELY SERIOUSLY.


Again...

Quote from: FFatPatt on February 25, 2007, 01:08:50 PM
You people are idiots.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 25, 2007, 03:25:28 PM
so they are going to overpay stallworth and not thomas?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on February 25, 2007, 03:53:53 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on February 25, 2007, 03:25:28 PM
so they are going to overpay stallworth and not thomas?

I farging hope so.

More likely, they're going to get Thomas back on the cheap and try (and fail) to do the same with Stallworth.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: General_Failure on February 25, 2007, 04:07:38 PM
He's going to the Raiders for big money. And when I say he, I mean both of them.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: phillywin2k5 on February 27, 2007, 09:40:31 AM
Quote from: MDS on February 25, 2007, 01:05:45 AM
Sad reality of value. Eagles completley overvalue the defensive line. See contracts for Kearse and Howard, now Thomas, and first round picks on the likes of Simon, McDougle, Bunkley and Patterson.

They couldn't care less about wide out. One (late) first rounder, Frederick Mitchell, and one marginal big money signing (big name, but underpaid given production) in Owens. Otherwise, we know...Charles Johnson, Torrence Small, Todd Pinkston, Greg Lewis, Antonio Freeman, Wilbur, James Thrash. It looks like they've finally hit on Reggie Brown.

Great.

I think this team is headed for a crash the way they have been putting extension money up for unproven players, i mean come on why the hell do you re-do Mike Patterson 1 year into his contract? Kearse and Howard have been busts based on the money they have been paid! McDougle BUST. Bunkley doesnt look good when you cant over take Walker or Rayburn for playing time.
They also havent drafted a bona fide #1 WR in 8 years of Andy Reids regime. Or a LB that can start for that matter. How about digging into the pocketbook once more and pay Stallworth, even with only 12 games hes made this team much better and he plays every down and BLOCKS! AND Hes only 27, in the prime of his career.

AND Heckert needs to shut the hell up about 38 catches! his gap toothed face hasnt made too many great catches on the GM side of the ball, besides Rookie Free Agents, and Baskett was a Viking and a freebie from Childress!

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on February 27, 2007, 10:00:39 AM
Runyan was on WIP this morning and said A) Feeley is just as good of a backup as Garcia, and B) the team badly needs a kick returner.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyGirl on February 27, 2007, 10:23:44 AM
Quote from: phillywin2k5 on February 27, 2007, 09:40:31 AM
Quote from: MDS on February 25, 2007, 01:05:45 AM
Sad reality of value. Eagles completley overvalue the defensive line. See contracts for Kearse and Howard, now Thomas, and first round picks on the likes of Simon, McDougle, Bunkley and Patterson.

They couldn't care less about wide out. One (late) first rounder, Frederick Mitchell, and one marginal big money signing (big name, but underpaid given production) in Owens. Otherwise, we know...Charles Johnson, Torrence Small, Todd Pinkston, Greg Lewis, Antonio Freeman, Wilbur, James Thrash. It looks like they've finally hit on Reggie Brown.

Great.

I think this team is headed for a crash the way they have been putting extension money up for unproven players, i mean come on why the hell do you re-do Mike Patterson 1 year into his contract? Kearse and Howard have been busts based on the money they have been paid! McDougle BUST. Bunkley doesnt look good when you cant over take Walker or Rayburn for playing time.
They also havent drafted a bona fide #1 WR in 8 years of Andy Reids regime. Or a LB that can start for that matter. How about digging into the pocketbook once more and pay Stallworth, even with only 12 games hes made this team much better and he plays every down and BLOCKS! AND Hes only 27, in the prime of his career.

AND Heckert needs to shut the hell up about 38 catches! his gap toothed face hasnt made too many great catches on the GM side of the ball, besides Rookie Free Agents, and Baskett was a Viking and a freebie from Childress!



wah.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: bobbyinlondon on February 27, 2007, 11:23:59 AM
Quote from: phillywin2k5 on February 27, 2007, 09:40:31 AM
Quote from: MDS on February 25, 2007, 01:05:45 AM
Sad reality of value. Eagles completley overvalue the defensive line. See contracts for Kearse and Howard, now Thomas, and first round picks on the likes of Simon, McDougle, Bunkley and Patterson.

They couldn't care less about wide out. One (late) first rounder, Frederick Mitchell, and one marginal big money signing (big name, but underpaid given production) in Owens. Otherwise, we know...Charles Johnson, Torrence Small, Todd Pinkston, Greg Lewis, Antonio Freeman, Wilbur, James Thrash. It looks like they've finally hit on Reggie Brown.

Great.

I think this team is headed for a crash the way they have been putting extension money up for unproven players, i mean come on why the hell do you re-do Mike Patterson 1 year into his contract? Kearse and Howard have been busts based on the money they have been paid! McDougle BUST. Bunkley doesnt look good when you cant over take Walker or Rayburn for playing time.
They also havent drafted a bona fide #1 WR in 8 years of Andy Reids regime. Or a LB that can start for that matter. How about digging into the pocketbook once more and pay Stallworth, even with only 12 games hes made this team much better and he plays every down and BLOCKS! AND Hes only 27, in the prime of his career.

AND Heckert needs to shut the hell up about 38 catches! his gap toothed face hasnt made too many great catches on the GM side of the ball, besides Rookie Free Agents, and Baskett was a Viking and a freebie from Childress!



Their model takes into account players that can be free agents 3 years in advance. The reason they gave their young players extensions is two fold: 1)they saw that this wasn't going to be an outstanding FA class--once you factor in who the franchise tags go on and the high-end RFA tenders, that takes away from a lot of this group; 2)they have to spend at least 92.5M of their cap money in the year. So, if the FA class is weak and you don't want them to spend it on their younger players, who exactly are they going to spend it on? I think they started souring a bit on Stallworth when he hurt his hammy in pregame warmups before the SF game and then he missed time. No one knows if the Eagles are going to at least give him an offer or not--I just see a lot of guesswork.

I didn't see anyone on any fan board bash Patterson last season when he had a decent season for a rookie--it's only because he had a sophmore slump, as some players do, then fans want to come out of the woodwork and bash the player. That's why it takes 3-4 years to judge players. Now McDougle, he's a bust and there's no two ways about it--but that's what the draft is, and that is what free agency is--guess work. Years ago, when Alvin Harper was tearing it up with Michael Irvin down in Dallas and he became a FA, people all over the league were predicting big things--what happened to him after he left Dallas? He fell off the face of the Earth in TB and Washington; same way with Larry Brown--Super Bowl MVP and then washed out with the Raiders.

As far as Heckert having poor drafts, he had the draft of 2002, he picked Andrews, he had a good 2005 draft class, and the 2006 draft class has the potential to be very good. We'll find out this summer whether Bunkley's dedication proves anything or if Justice can challenge William Thomas, or if Gocong is capable, etc. But you can't judge a draft class after one year.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 27, 2007, 11:49:16 AM
I didn't see anyone on any fan board bash Patterson last season when he had a decent season for a rookie

i dont think anyone has ever bashed him...but i was calling him vanilla last year...all people are saying is how ridiculous it is the extend him right now

So, if the FA class is weak and you don't want them to spend it on their younger players, who exactly are they going to spend it on?

stallworth for starters...and just because the FA class is weak doesnt mean you cant upgrade in it...spend on guys that will improve your team


That's why it takes 3-4 years to judge players.

As far as Heckert having poor drafts, he had the draft of 2002, he picked Andrews, he had a good 2005 draft class, and the 2006 draft class has the potential to be very good


so does it take 3-4 years to judge players or was the 2005 draft good

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on February 27, 2007, 11:56:51 AM
Thomas re-signed, should be announced this weekend
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on February 27, 2007, 11:58:22 AM
Quote from: BigEd76 on February 27, 2007, 11:56:51 AM
Thomas re-signed, should be announced this weekend

w00t!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on February 27, 2007, 12:04:21 PM
Quote from: BigEd76 on February 27, 2007, 11:56:51 AM
Thomas re-signed, should be announced this weekend

He's vital to the continued mediocrity of the defense.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on February 27, 2007, 12:10:04 PM
christ...i never saw so much commotion over a mediocre player
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on February 27, 2007, 12:11:25 PM
Nice terminology!  **HIGH FIVE**
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 27, 2007, 12:14:27 PM
christ...i never saw so much commotion over a mediocre player


i know its absolutely unreal

he was undrafted and got cut by the titans

how does the front office get so many eagle fans to buy into this stuff...to get excited about some guy called juqua thomas...its kinda scary actually

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MURP on February 27, 2007, 12:24:26 PM
Quote from: SunMo on February 27, 2007, 12:10:04 PM
christ...i never saw so much commotion over a mediocre player

yeah, not since some guy named Jeff Garcia gave every armchair coach a boner. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on February 27, 2007, 12:26:21 PM
fair enough
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on February 27, 2007, 03:44:29 PM
Apparently Mikell just re-signed....4 yrs
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on February 27, 2007, 03:51:36 PM
[munson]now we can't re-sign Stallworth![/munson]
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: phillywin2k5 on February 27, 2007, 04:04:03 PM
Quote from: BigEd76 on February 27, 2007, 11:56:51 AM
Thomas re-signed, should be announced this weekend

you mean Hollis who just signed a 4 year 12-million contract with the AINTS?? :-D

Saints officials did not immediately comment on the negotiations Tuesday, but Thomas' agent, Ron Slavin, said the contract will be worth $6 million next season.

so i guess hes getting 2mil this year 6mil next which he wont see anyway and the remaining 4 over the last 2 years
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: phillywin2k5 on February 27, 2007, 04:07:02 PM
Quote from: MURP on February 27, 2007, 12:24:26 PM
Quote from: SunMo on February 27, 2007, 12:10:04 PM
christ...i never saw so much commotion over a mediocre player

yeah, not since some guy named Jeff Garcia gave every armchair coach a boner. 

Garcias going to get 3-4 mil a year to backup the 2nd year guy in Denver
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on February 27, 2007, 04:30:01 PM
Hollis had a good year for them.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: phillywin2k5 on February 27, 2007, 04:31:22 PM
Quote from: FFatPatt on February 27, 2007, 04:30:01 PM
Hollis had a good year for them.

yeah especially since he was suspended for 4 games for Steroids, or so he says his Asthma meds
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on February 27, 2007, 04:37:12 PM
man, i wish the Eagles had a big run-stopper like Hollis, oh wait
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on February 27, 2007, 04:39:55 PM
Quote from: SunMo on February 27, 2007, 04:37:12 PM
man, i wish the Eagles had a big run-stopper like Hollis, oh wait

Brodrick Bunkley is a stud!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on February 27, 2007, 04:45:23 PM
omg, he luks like teh Thing!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on February 27, 2007, 04:50:31 PM
That Mikell signing is on PE.com now
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Mad-Lad on February 27, 2007, 04:52:38 PM
Quote from: BigEd76 on February 27, 2007, 04:50:31 PM
That Mikell signing is on PE.com now

Sweet!  can't wait to hear Spewdaro's take.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on February 27, 2007, 04:53:53 PM
It's already the best defensive signing of the off-season... by any team... ever.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Mad-Lad on February 27, 2007, 04:57:50 PM
goal line stand vs. Dallas = 4 year deal
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 27, 2007, 04:58:15 PM
can't wait to hear Spewdaro's take

ha...forgot about that

someone post it when it becomes available
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on February 27, 2007, 05:04:30 PM
His take on the QB situation as a whole is super:

QuoteQUARTERBACK

McNabb is on schedule to return for training camp and everybody is going to watch him intently, of course. McNabb appears to have every bit of his confidence and his swagger, so now he has to show he can return to full form and play with that same confidence. And, of course, McNabb has to stay healthy. He hasn't had a full season since 2004.

A.J. Feeley has his contract extension in hand and is looking forward to settling in as McNabb's backup. Feeley has done nothing but play good football for the Eagles, including his success in limited time in 2006. Feeley has size, a command of the offense and a good feel for what the coaches want from him.

Jeff Garcia is scheduled to enter free agency on Friday and it is very likely that he will find a job with another team.

Who is the No. 3 quarterback? Yale product Jeff Mroz is on the roster as a prospect, and he will get some reps in the spring. Koy Detmer is scheduled to be an unrestricted free agent on Friday, so the Eagles have a hole for an experienced hand at No. 3.

Maybe it is a draft pick. Maybe it is a rookie signed after the draft. Maybe it is a veteran who slips through the cracks.

The Eagles need a No. 3. That is suddenly an off-season need.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on February 27, 2007, 05:31:05 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on February 27, 2007, 04:58:15 PM
can't wait to hear Spewdaro's take

ha...forgot about that

someone post it when it becomes available
Spews gay lover wrote the Mikell article:
Quote[Mikell Re-Signed To 4-Year Deal 




February 27, 2007
By CHRIS McPHERSON


The Eagles made sure that their two-time special teams MVP did not have a chance to hit the free-agent market.
Safety Quintin Mikell was re-signed to a four-year contract Tuesday. The 5 feet 10, 206-pound Mikell has been one of the best special teams players since he signed with the Eagles as a rookie free agent in 2003. Mikell's value increased when he earned a lot of snaps on defense in the final few games of the regular season.


Mikell has been the special teams MVP for the past two seasons 
"It feels good. We've been working for quite some time on it, so to finally be done and be ready to focus on football for another four years is great," said Mikell. "I think I fit in well here. I like the coaches, the coaches like me, all the players get along. We have a good family-type atmosphere here. It just felt right. That's why I definitely wanted to be here."

"Quintin has been a really good football player for us," said general manager Tom Heckert in a statement. "He's a vital contributor for us on special teams and does a very solid job when he's on the field defensively. We're glad to keep him here in Philadelphia."

Against the Cowboys on Christmas, Mikell blitzed into the backfield and stuffed running back Marion Barber for a 3-yard loss on a fourth-and-goal play. In the regular season finale against Atlanta, Mikell played most of the game at safety after the starters were rested and tied a career high with eight tackles.

By re-signing Mikell, the Eagles will enjoy some continuity as Rory Segrest begins his first season as the special teams coordinator. The Eagles also solidify their backfield as another safety, Michael Lewis, is scheduled to become an unrestricted free agent and appears headed for another team. Now, the Eagles have 10 players who are eligible for free agency when it begins this Friday.

The 26-year-old Mikell carved his niche on the Eagles through special teams where he was the MVP in 2005 and 2006, as well as one of the team's playoff captains this year. He has also earned league-wide recognition for his special teams play. Sports Illustrated's Paul Zimmerman named him an All-Pro and Pro Football Weekly declared that Mikell was the Eagles' best special teams player.

Mikell led the Eagles for the second straight year with 35 special teams tackles and 337 special teams production points in 2006. Those numbers topped his 2005 totals of 28 special teams tackles and 228 special teams production points. Mikell's fourth-quarter field goal block in 2005 against the San Diego Chargers was recovered by cornerback Matt Ware and returned for the game-winning touchdown. As a safety, Mikell has 51 career tackles, one interception, one forced fumble and one fumble recovery.

Born in New Orleans and raised in Eugene, Ore., Mikell signed with the Eagles as a rookie free agent after a successful career on the blue turf of Boise State. Mikell finished second all-time in school history in tackles with 401. In 2002, he was named the WAC defensive player of the year after he had 97 tackles, four sacks, one interception, eight forced fumbles and two blocked field goals.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MDS on February 27, 2007, 06:37:10 PM
Quentin Mikell and Jaqua Thomas.

Boners.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on February 27, 2007, 07:19:04 PM
All Mikell and Thomas are is a built in excuse that when fans say they don't re-sign their good players(Stallworth, Garcia) Banner comes out and says that they do sign their own guys... just look at Mikell and Thomas. They were key contributors last season, blah blah blah.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Beermonkey on February 27, 2007, 07:19:08 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on February 27, 2007, 12:14:27 PM
christ...i never saw so much commotion over a mediocre player


i know its absolutely unreal

he was undrafted and got cut by the titans

how does the front office get so many eagle fans to buy into this stuff...to get excited about some guy called juqua thomas...its kinda scary actually

Where's all this commotion that you guys are talking about? All I see is FF changing font sizes. Maybe you're confusing this with Garcia-mania.

(http://i81.photobucket.com/albums/j224/beermonkey68/garciahypnodisk.gif)



Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: General_Failure on February 27, 2007, 08:28:32 PM
Garcia hasn't been a good player in a few years now. Anybody that thought he was getting resigned (or thought he wouldn't because he threatened McNabb's position) is one noggin knocker away from drooling constantly.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: troyhstewart on February 27, 2007, 09:32:42 PM
Quote from: King Cole on February 27, 2007, 07:19:04 PM
All Mikell and Thomas are is a built in excuse that when fans say they don't re-sign their good players(Stallworth, Garcia) Banner comes out and says that they do sign their own guys... just look at Mikell and Thomas. They were key contributors last season, blah blah blah.

I haven't seen news of Thomas signing, but I have no problem with  what the Eagles have done so far. Stallworth is not worthy of a Reggie Wayne type contract. Let somebody else overpay him. My beef is with their piss poor drafting during the Reid era.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on February 27, 2007, 10:24:19 PM
Quote from: troyhstewart on February 27, 2007, 09:32:42 PM
Quote from: King Cole on February 27, 2007, 07:19:04 PM
All Mikell and Thomas are is a built in excuse that when fans say they don't re-sign their good players(Stallworth, Garcia) Banner comes out and says that they do sign their own guys... just look at Mikell and Thomas. They were key contributors last season, blah blah blah.

I haven't seen news of Thomas signing, but I have no problem with  what the Eagles have done so far. Stallworth is not worthy of a Reggie Wayne type contract. Let somebody else overpay him. My beef is with their piss poor drafting during the Reid era.

What is the alternative though? Sure, they won't commit ridiculous money to Stallworth, but does it make the team better? To me that is the most important thing. Money should only be a factor to a certain point. If someone offers him the rumored deal with 6 years 40 million/18 million SB then fine. Let him go. But if it is 6 years 35 million with 12 million SB then sign him. Because again, it will be nice to not overpay, but then the next day when that wears off you are like oops our starting WRs are Reggie Brown and Hank Baskett.

Baskett might be good for a while, but be honest. Would you be comfortable if somehow the Eagles made it to the next Superbowl and we were going up against an AFC powerhouse with Reggie Brown and Hank Baskett? Not to mention McNabb may be hobbled and not be able to buy time with his legs anymore, thus making Baskett less effective. He is slow and has trouble getting open.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Munson on February 28, 2007, 01:02:50 AM
Hopefully they can get Mikell to challenge Considine or something. What sucks about losing Mike Lewis is that right now we don't have a starter over 6'0 tall. At least I'm pretty sure COnsidine isn't that tall, and even if he is, he still has proven to suck so far.

I'm glad someone else realizes Stallworth isn't worth the money he's asking for. Of course I'd like them to find some middle ground and sign him for a lesser price tag, but I'm not holding my breath like a few others around here want to do on it. I see no reason why Drew Rosenhaus is going to be friendly with these negotiations with the Eagles. If he resigns, it'll be a miracle, and I'll love the Eagles FO for at least a day or two.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 28, 2007, 06:34:35 AM
stop bringing up rosenhaus...hes no different than any other agent and the eagles have had good relations with him and still do...stop being brainwashed by people who try to lump rosenhaus in with TO...rosenhaus is no different than any other agent except hes more well known

but I'm not holding my breath like a few others around here want to do on it

show me where one single person thinks the eagles will resign stallworth...i think demon has said it but im pretty sure in tongue and cheek

like ff said youre using the fact that they wont sign him to try to validate not signing him

at the end of day when all this is over i want you to point out the players you would rather have had the eagles signed than stallworth...im talking in free agency..because mikell and thomas dont count as the eagles could easily sign stallworth even after signing two backups


Hopefully they can get Mikell to challenge Considine or something

mikell is a great special teamer a guy every team needs and im glad they resigned him but hes not a nfl safety

the eagles future and for that matter present at safety is kind of disheartining right with dawkins aging and nothing else on the team at that spot....i really hope they get one of the three big safeties (griffin - nelson - landry) in the first round this year
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 28, 2007, 08:11:53 AM
The commitment to the 26-year-old Mikell through 2010 officially ends the up-and-down tenure of strong safety Michael Lewis, who is one of nine players (exclud ing Thomas) free to hit the open market at midnight Friday.

But not before a few parting shots aimed at the Eagles' front office.

"I had a wonderful five years," said Lewis, who fell out of favor during a sub-par 2005 season -- one year after making his only Pro Bowl. "We built something great here with Brian Dawkins, Troy Vin cent, Donovan McNabb and the others. But outside of those guys in the locker room and the coaching staff, I really don't have much to say about the organization. The week prior to me getting benched (at New Orleans, Oct. 15) I was told I was having an excellent season. Then I give up a big play (48-yard touchdown pass to Joe Horn) and I am benched?"

One look at the sizeable gap between what Lewis and agent Rod ney Williams wanted prior to training camp, and what the Eagles were willing to pay, signaled the be ginning of the end for the team's second-round pick from Colorado in 2002.

"Based on what they told us back then, we knew I probably wouldn't be back," said Lewis, a solid run stopper but seen as a liability in pass coverage. "I think my resumé speaks for itself. I make plays and I've been to the Pro Bowl. I know all of those guys in that locker room were in my corner last year. I love the city of Philadelphia and all the things I was able to accomplish there, but this is just the way (the Eagles) do business. Put it this way: wherever I go, that team is going to appreciate me and what I bring to the table -- on and off the field. I will be appreciated."

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on February 28, 2007, 08:19:30 AM
Bob Sanders is 5'8" and one of the best safeties in the league.  I'd mame to have him on the Eagles.

Oh, and Mike Lewis leaving certainly is far from "addition by subtraction"... because they don't have anyone to truly and adequately take his place that can do any better overall.  That said, he makes a ton of big mistakes to go with his fair share of big plays and is really not a great player by any means.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 28, 2007, 08:26:13 AM
That said, he makes a ton of big mistakes to go

no he doesnt...he made a couple really bad errors in a short time span this year that got played over and over because the eagles benched since he wouldnt sign at their terms

he was a good to very good player for four years while he was signed up...then in his contract year he all of a sudden becomes a scrub

im not trying to get into this again so dont respond just think about it
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Zanshin on February 28, 2007, 08:34:18 AM
Dude, he was a tremendous liability last year.  It wasn't about one play.  You have a short memory, if you think otherwise.  The year before, he was very good...last year he was a consistent problem when starting.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on February 28, 2007, 08:34:33 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on February 28, 2007, 08:26:13 AM
im not trying to get into this again so dont respond just think about it

Yes, we know you love the safeties that can't cover to save their life but are big, black, and strong.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on February 28, 2007, 08:37:22 AM
Quote from: Zanshin on February 28, 2007, 08:34:18 AM
Dude, he was a tremendous liability last year.  It wasn't about one play.  You have a short memory, if you think otherwise.  The year before, he was very good...last year he was a consistent problem when starting.
I agree, his poor pass coverage wasn't an isolated incident, the week before the Saints game he went for an awful fake, got burnt deep and was called for P.I. almost blowing the Dallas game.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 28, 2007, 08:48:42 AM
right a couple bad plays (dallas and no)...when he played the team was much better than when considine played...lewis went out and they lost four of five...lewis was put back in the mix and the defense played much better winning five in a row

the point here is dont buy into the teams propaganda that lewis is a scrub...hes a good nfl safety and will go on to another team and play well for them...i wont kill the team for not resigning him because i wanna see what kind of money he gets...as he is definitely a candidate to be overpaid on the open market...but what i will slam the team for is alienating a good player for no other reason than he wouldnt sign with you for cheap

why cant the eagles agree to disagree with him but respect his position let him hit the market to judge his value and then see if youd like to bring him back...instead they act like bitter iceholes and cut all ties with him leaving no room to negotiate and in turn leave the team in a precarious position not just last year (for example he didnt play in the saints playoff game even tho the team was getting gouged in the run game) but also going into next year with quinten mikell and sean considine as two of your top three safties...thats a joke
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on February 28, 2007, 08:53:29 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on February 28, 2007, 08:26:13 AM
That said, he makes a ton of big mistakes to go

no he doesnt...he made a couple really bad errors...

No.  He was a glaring weakness.  He didn't just get burned on big plays, he let up medium plays because he bit on the pump to the underneath route, or on the play action.  Stop with the "it' was only a couple plays" crap.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 28, 2007, 08:57:41 AM
He was a glaring weakness.  He didn't just get burned on big plays, he let up medium plays because he bit on the pump to the underneath route, or on the play action


wrong...and how would you know...thats not something you can see on the game thread
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on February 28, 2007, 09:07:22 AM
I can see the game in my head, and I get the "Lewis fargup highlight reel" directly from Reid after each game.

You're the only cat who insists that Lewis got a bum rap for a couple bad plays.  To you, it's a vast FO conspiracy (in collusion with ESPN I'm sure) to discredit an uppity black man.  I know you like to be the center of attention and instigate arguments, etc.  It's a vigy thing.  Nevertheless, you're being ridiculous. 

I'm not saying Considine is better.  I'm not saying the Eagles should let him go without making an offer, etc. 

It is true however that he's been a liability for two years and if you can't see that, then you shouldn't bother going to the games. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on February 28, 2007, 09:11:55 AM
The bottom line here is obvious. Roy Williams and Sean Taylor are overrated.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on February 28, 2007, 09:13:17 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on February 28, 2007, 08:48:42 AM
right a couple bad plays (dallas and no)...when he played the team was much better than when considine played...lewis went out and they lost four of five...lewis was put back in the mix and the defense played much better winning five in a row

the point here is dont buy into the teams propaganda that lewis is a scrub...hes a good nfl safety and will go on to another team and play well for them...i wont kill the team for not resigning him because i wanna see what kind of money he gets...as he is definitely a candidate to be overpaid on the open market...but what i will slam the team for is alienating a good player for no other reason than he wouldnt sign with you for cheap

why cant the eagles agree to disagree with him but respect his position let him hit the market to judge his value and then see if youd like to bring him back...instead they act like bitter iceholes and cut all ties with him leaving no room to negotiate and in turn leave the team in a precarious position not just last year (for example he didnt play in the saints playoff game even tho the team was getting gouged in the run game) but also going into next year with quinten mikell and sean considine as two of your top three safties...thats a joke

Your argument that "he's better than Considine" isn't exactly a ringing endorsement of his skills in general.

Lewis is an average overall player.  No better.  No worse.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on February 28, 2007, 09:15:30 AM
He will get paid wherever he goes..it's gonna be way more than he's worth.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 28, 2007, 09:16:51 AM
You're the only cat who insists that Lewis got a bum rap for a couple bad plays.

meaningless point...that doesnt make me wrong

To you, it's a vast FO conspiracy (in collusion with ESPN I'm sure) to discredit an uppity black man.  

its not a conspiracy at all...its how the eagles do business...they are right up front about it...you dont take our offer at the number we put forth youre gone...and since youre gone we dont have any need on the field for you so we will put in the guy (considine) who we think is our future....same thing happened with hood this year

can you tell me why players who played as bad or worse than lewis didnt get benched....in fact one of them patterson got rewarded..and why did he get rewarded...because he agreed to the eagles number....


I'm not saying Considine is better.  I'm not saying the Eagles should let him go without making an offer, etc.  

then we agree and it seems as tho youre the one arguing for no reason...because if you truly think lewis has sucked for two years then why would you make him an offer

either he sucks and you dont want him on the team or hes not really as bad as they would have you believe and they treated him like crap

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 28, 2007, 09:19:05 AM
He will get paid wherever he goes..it's gonna be way more than he's worth

but you wanted the eagles to make him an offer?...would they have overpaid or do only other teams overpay


Lewis is an average overall player.  No better.  No worse.

hes definitely an above average safety in the nfl...thats not even a debate
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on February 28, 2007, 09:19:59 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on February 28, 2007, 09:16:51 AM
You're the only cat who insists that Lewis got a bum rap for a couple bad plays.

meaningless point...that doesnt make me wrong

It is not a meaningless point.  Everyone else is watching him play too..and the verdict each of us has reached is that he's been lousy for two years.  He's good to very good in run support, and awful in coverage.  What makes you wrong is that you're blinded by your crusade against the front office, unable to see what's been happening on the field.

Like I said, it's a vigy thing. 

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 28, 2007, 09:28:38 AM
theres a difference between reading the game thread and watching him get burned on espn highlites va rewatching a game on tape or dvd and focusing in on how he plays

basically he got burned a couple times this year in a two week span and all of a sudden the bandwagon started that he was terrible...then people stretched that into hes been terrible for years...and then on to that he just plain sucks....

but do a search on this board going back a year or so and check out how many people were talking about the eagles extending him

trust me hes not that bad...you need to watch and make your own opinion rather than follow all the wildebeast into the crocdile infested river
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on February 28, 2007, 09:30:58 AM
I've seen enough of that cat to know he sucks in coverage, and has for the last two years.  I'm done arguing with you about it.  I hope you can find someone else to feed the fire.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on February 28, 2007, 09:44:02 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on February 28, 2007, 09:19:05 AM
Lewis is an average overall player.  No better.  No worse.

hes definitely an above average safety in the nfl...thats not even a debate

Wrong.  It's definitely a debate.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on February 28, 2007, 10:12:05 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on February 28, 2007, 08:48:42 AM
right a couple bad plays (dallas and no)...when he played the team was much better than when considine played...lewis went out and they lost four of five...lewis was put back in the mix and the defense played much better winning five in a row

the point here is dont buy into the teams propaganda that lewis is a scrub...hes a good nfl safety and will go on to another team and play well for them...i wont kill the team for not resigning him because i wanna see what kind of money he gets...as he is definitely a candidate to be overpaid on the open market...but what i will slam the team for is alienating a good player for no other reason than he wouldnt sign with you for cheap

why cant the eagles agree to disagree with him but respect his position let him hit the market to judge his value and then see if youd like to bring him back...instead they act like bitter iceholes and cut all ties with him leaving no room to negotiate and in turn leave the team in a precarious position not just last year (for example he didnt play in the saints playoff game even tho the team was getting gouged in the run game) but also going into next year with quinten mikell and sean considine as two of your top three safties...thats a joke

IGY... I know you're far from the biggest FO guy... and sometimes I agree with you on how petty they are, but if you think their not resigning Lewis has to do with his contract and not his play on the field... I'm not sure what you've been looking at.  It's not just "a couple bad plays" that sent him packing.  People (including us) have been ripping his coverage ever since last year, saying he's regressed from what was a very promising first couple seasons.  NOTABALE mistakes he's made this year as a starter include:

1. Week 1 - missed on a simple tackle against the Texans (Moulds) giving up the first score of the year.
2. Week 2 - blew coverage against the Giants resulting in a wide open TD for Toomer.
3. Week 5 - bit on a stutter step from Glenn that almost lost the game to Dallas.
4. Week 6 - bit on another stutter step from Horn that gave back the lead for good to New Orleans.

He was benched week 7.  I'd say it had less to do with a contract situation and more to do with farging up in at least 4 out of the first 6 games... and like I said earlier, he had a tough year last year on top of that.

That said, I'm not saying we have a better option in Considine (actually I'm with you hoping that we get one of the big 3 safeties in the first round) but the reason Mike Lewis is gone is because he's a one dimensional safety who's just as big a liability in pass coverage as Considine is in run support.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 28, 2007, 10:21:47 AM
you want me to go week by week on dhani jones since he came into the league...why did the eagles sign him in the first place and why do they continue to keep him

how about patterson....there were single drives this year where he made more bad plays than lewis has in the last two years

sheldon brown...lets cut him hes been burned numerous times over the past couple years...

dawk was abused in the run game numerous times last year

how many passes has reggie brown dropped

can you explain to me whay these guys dont get cut and in some instances actually get extended...while lewis got benched and blackballed for a far inferior guy in considine


bottom line is if lewis agrees to what the birds offered him last summer or last season hes their starting saftey for the next four years and no one is saying that hes a horrible safety
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on February 28, 2007, 10:27:06 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on February 28, 2007, 10:21:47 AM
you want me to go week by week on dhani jones since he came into the league...why did the eagles sign him in the first place and why do they continue to keep him

how about patterson....there were single drives this year where he made more bad plays than lewis has in the last two years

sheldon brown...lets cut him hes been burned numerous times over the past couple years...

dawk was abused in the run game numerous times last year

how many passes has reggie brown dropped

can you explain to me whay these guys dont get cut and in some instances actually get extended...while lewis got benched and blackballed for a far inferior guy in considine

Dhani:  They wanted Lewis to take snaps from him.  Lewis said he didn't want to play linebacker.  They signed him because he was thought to be adequate filler for Emmons.

Patterson:  He was outmatched at times undoubtedly, but does he really make nearly the mental mistakes that Lewis did?  Give examples if you truly believe so.

Sheldon:  Besides being put on an island against #1 WR's when he is clearly a #2 CB is a good recipe for disaster.  Again, he's not crazy athletic, but he's usually not far out of position.

Dawk:  He's getting older.  Lewis doesn't have that excuse.

I thought you said dropped passes were a meaningless stat...?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on February 28, 2007, 10:27:10 AM
classic vigy tactics.  the point being argued is not all those other people...it's whether or not Lewis sucked in coverage.  I'm saying he did, you're claiming he didn't.  that is, until it's no longer convenient to claim that, so now you're claiming he's unfairly targeted while other people who (allegedly) sucked get a pass. 

like I said, you've got an axe to grind which has nothign to do with the on field performance.  you want to have an internet fight against everyone, and you'll shift your tactics to keep it rolling.

zzzz

figure it out for yourself why he's gone, homeboy.  you won't listen to anyone else anyway
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on February 28, 2007, 10:37:47 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on February 28, 2007, 10:21:47 AM
you want me to go week by week on dhani jones since he came into the league...why did the eagles sign him in the first place and why do they continue to keep him

how about patterson....there were single drives this year where he made more bad plays than lewis has in the last two years

sheldon brown...lets cut him hes been burned numerous times over the past couple years...

dawk was abused in the run game numerous times last year

how many passes has reggie brown dropped

can you explain to me whay these guys dont get cut and in some instances actually get extended...while lewis got benched and blackballed for a far inferior guy in considine


bottom line is if lewis agrees to what the birds offered him last summer or last season hes their starting saftey for the next four years and no one is saying that hes a horrible safety

I'm not talking about any of these guys.  I'm talking about you calling Mike Lewis an "above average" and a "good to very good safety", yet the Eagles want to let him walk because he wants to get paid.  He's regressed terribly over the last couple years and that's why he's being shown the door.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 28, 2007, 10:40:31 AM
again...if lewis agrees to any of the eagle offers over tha last year and a half he doesnt get benched and blackballed last year and he is your starting safety for the foreseeable future...PERIOD...but he didnt so a few bad plays puts him on the bench...and he amazingly stayed on the bench thru a FIVE game period of getting destroyed by the run...for the most part when lewis played last year the team won when he didnt they lost


the point being argued is not all those other people...it's whether or not Lewis sucked in coverage.  I'm saying he did, you're claiming he didn't.

the point is lots of people on the team have sucked worse than lewis...why didnt they get blackballed....can you answer that for me?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: troyhstewart on February 28, 2007, 10:43:19 AM
I agree with most on here that Lewis has played poorly the last 2 seasons. If you remember correctly, most people on here were bashing both starting safeties two years ago.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 28, 2007, 10:44:33 AM
He's regressed terribly over the last couple years and that's why he's being shown the door.

absolutely not...if that was the case the eagles wouldnt have been trying to keep him into this season...he leaving because he wont agree to the eagles money...and thats fair...maybe he is way overpricing himself...no one says the eagles have to pay him what he wants and no one is saying they are making a misatke letting him go....but dont bench a guy for half a season for a far inferior player because he made a few mistakes and in the process alienating him to the point of no return....its simply bad business
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 28, 2007, 11:03:09 AM
I agree with most on here that Lewis has played poorly the last 2 seasons. If you remember correctly, most people on here were bashing both starting safeties two years ago.

dont get me wrong...i wanted lewis dead after the new orleans game...but you cant let emotions get the best of you and take a few bad plays and bench a guy for a far weaker player...otherwise the whole team would be benched at some point
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: troyhstewart on February 28, 2007, 11:11:12 AM
I don't think it was just a few bad plays, he was a liability in coverage. I also don't believe Considine is a "far inferior player".

If he was under contract, they probably would have tried harder to hide his deficiencies. He's not, wasn't going to be, so they had to try to develop for the future.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 28, 2007, 11:16:24 AM
I don't think it was just a few bad plays, he was a liability in coverage

hes not a coverage safety...everyone knows that...perhaps the eagles shoudlnt have been putting him on an island like they were...roy williams is a liability in coverage as well...in fact roy williams makes more coverage mistakes than lewis...yet with him all you hear is overrated...while lewis shouldnt even be starting over sean considine?

If he was under contract, they probably would have tried harder to hide his deficiencies. He's not, wasn't going to be, so they had to try to develop for the future.

so instead of putting the team in the best position to win the eagles manipulate their roster by who is under contract the longest

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on February 28, 2007, 11:24:16 AM
grind that axe!!
grind that axe!!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 28, 2007, 11:25:53 AM
swallow that brain!!
swallow that brain!!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on February 28, 2007, 11:28:06 AM
You guys are going to hump each others' mouths later, aren't you?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on February 28, 2007, 11:29:56 AM
nah, I'm gonna titty farg his fatty man boobs and call him Mike the whole time
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on February 28, 2007, 12:20:10 PM
Quote from: Diomedes on February 28, 2007, 11:29:56 AM
nah, I'm gonna titty farg his fatty man boobs and call him Mike the whole time

post of the day... so far
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on February 28, 2007, 12:21:03 PM
He wanted something similar to the 4 yrs, $25M, $11M SB that Roy Williams got and the Eagles wouldn't give it to him, so most of the Eagles beat reporters theorized that his contract situation was on his mind and he wasn't concentrating enough on football.  To me that's too easy of an "if A then B", but I wouldn't discount it completely.  The same thing could happen with LJ Smith this year....
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on February 28, 2007, 12:23:13 PM
Great players step up a notch in contract years instead of back.  They're the same kinds of guys who can deliver under pressure - in 4th quarter/playoff scenarios.

Guys like Lewis that choke on it in contract years aren't the types of guys that play a key role in winning a Super Bowl.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 28, 2007, 12:27:42 PM
lewis has sucked for at least two years tho so that kinda eliminates that theory
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on February 28, 2007, 12:29:24 PM
They tried to extend his contract in 2005...
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 28, 2007, 12:33:46 PM
he sucked in all of 2005 and possibly longer

but just to be clear anyone in any sort of contract negotiations...regardless of when they take place doesnt play as well?

you might be on to something easy perhaps that why patterson was so horrible this year?...that would explain the reggie dropsies as well?

things that make you go hmmmm
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on February 28, 2007, 12:36:02 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on February 28, 2007, 12:27:42 PM
lewis has sucked for at least two years tho so that kinda eliminates that theory

Now, you're admitting he sucks because you want to pick a new argument.

This is borderline hilarious stuff.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on February 28, 2007, 12:36:09 PM
If he had money on his mind instead of taking someone's head off on the field then I don't want him anyway.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MURP on February 28, 2007, 12:48:40 PM
I see Michael Lewis as an average safety who may have a chance to play better next year.   He really isnt worth the arguing though.  The Eagles wont miss him and need to get a better safety back there than him if they want to win the SB anyway.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 28, 2007, 12:52:16 PM
Now, you're admitting he sucks because you want to pick a new argument.


you really cant be that stupid to think i was talking from my own perspective when i said that
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on February 28, 2007, 12:55:10 PM
I can't be stupid enough to think that you'd be smart enough to realize Lewis has played like shtein?

Good point.  I stand corrected.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: phillywin2k5 on February 28, 2007, 01:08:35 PM
Quote from: MURP on February 28, 2007, 12:48:40 PM
I see Michael Lewis as an average safety who may have a chance to play better next year.   He really isnt worth the arguing though.  The Eagles wont miss him and need to get a better safety back there than him if they want to win the SB anyway.

thats there most likely draft choice in the 1st round unless Willis is available or they trade down into the top of the 2nd round.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 28, 2007, 01:39:37 PM
the problem is none of the three biggies is gonna drop to them so they would have to trade up and grab one...which i am all for btw...i love all three
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on February 28, 2007, 02:07:41 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on February 28, 2007, 10:40:31 AM
again...if lewis agrees to any of the eagle offers over tha last year and a half he doesnt get benched and blackballed last year and he is your starting safety for the foreseeable future...PERIOD

link?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 28, 2007, 02:11:57 PM
i cant explain everything for you guys...at some point yous are gonna have to let go of the side of the pool and just do it
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Beermonkey on February 28, 2007, 02:23:53 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on February 28, 2007, 02:11:57 PM
i cant explain everything for you guys...at some point yous are gonna have to buy into my delusional theory about a petty Zionist front office agenda.

;)

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on February 28, 2007, 02:52:33 PM
ha
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: methdeez on February 28, 2007, 03:11:33 PM
Quote from: SunMo on February 27, 2007, 04:37:12 PM
man, i wish the Eagles had a big run-stopper like Hollis, oh wait
Man, I wish the Eagles had a big fat guy who made funny jokes all the time. Oh, wait.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: mussa on February 28, 2007, 04:59:07 PM
where are all the "character" guys on this team. can't they restructure to get stallworth back. character my ass. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on February 28, 2007, 06:17:42 PM
They tell you that they love character guys when it supports them being cheap. They would never sign a Chad Johnson(since TO) because of his character issues, but when Stallworth wants big money it isn't such a big key anymore.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Beermonkey on February 28, 2007, 09:16:02 PM
Quote from: mussa on February 28, 2007, 04:59:07 PM
where are all the "character" guys on this team. can't they restructure to get stallworth back. character my ass. 

Where has anyone in the Eagles organization said that a lack of cap dollars is what would be the cause for not signing Stallworth?

Most of those "character" guys that you're alluding to, don't take pay cuts, they just have their bonuses called something different so they can be counted favorably against the cap. "Restructure" does not equal "Pay Cut".
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Stallworth Supporter on February 28, 2007, 11:11:56 PM
Get Moulds, for cheap!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on March 01, 2007, 10:44:24 AM
Arizona Republic:
Quote[The Cardinals] are not expected to pursue Buffalo's Nate Clements, but Indianapolis' Nick Harper could be a target, as could Cincinnati's Tory James or Philadelphia's Roderick Hood.

Tampa Tribune:
QuoteTen players the Bucs figure to have their eyes on when the free agency signing period begins Friday.
.
.
•WR Donte' Stallworth - He may never be a No. 1, but he'd ease the need to draft Calvin Johnson.
•QB Jeff Garcia - He has the experience the Bucs need in a backup, and he will push Chris Simms.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MURP on March 01, 2007, 10:52:08 AM
Quoteland of the free
Eagles expected to be bystanders in free agency as usual
By LES BOWEN
bowenl@phillynews.com

    * LIVE CHAT Noon today with Paul Domowitch

THIS IS THE WORST, most frustrating time of the year for many Eagles fans. The 2006 season will have been dead for 7 long weeks by this weekend. We still are 2 months from the 2007 entry draft, 5 months from the start of training camp.

But here is free agency, starting tomorrow, or actually midnight tonight. This is an actual NFL event, less mind-numbing than watching linemen prance around traffic cones at last week's scouting combine, and it's complete with wild rumors and breaking-news bulletins on ESPN, except... well, except that the Eagles, like many successful teams, generally don't participate. Or at least, they don't participate at the level that would make a fan's pulse quicken, that would soothe the impact of that season-ticket price increase. The 1 year in recent memory they did, in 2004, they ended up going to the Super Bowl, but they also ended up with a super-sized hangover.

Most fans know the drill by now. They know that the teams that go out and make big splashes in free agency usually are the teams that perenially just don't get it, like the taterskins, the Raiders and the Browns. "Fool's Gold" is not a difficult concept to grasp; yes, the Browns stole LeCharles Bentley out from under the Birds' beaks last year, and how is that working out for them? Watching the Eagles beat the taterskins twice last season, did you remember that a lot of fans wanted the Birds to sign Antwaan Randle El last winter? But back when it was happening, it seemed so important.

Wouldn't it be fun if Jeffrey Lurie could somehow morph into Daniel Snyder for a few weeks every year, starting in late February, ending well before time to bungle away the draft? But that can't happen, and between September and February, Eagles fans understand why it wouldn't be a good thing. It's just right now that they have a problem with it.

So prepare to be thrilled by the news that the Eagles have re-signed Juqua Thomas. Keep an eye out for a second-tier running back, a Chris Brown or a Najeh Davenport, maybe Dominic Rhodes, even. If the bidding gets too crazy for those guys, the Eagles probably still can bring back Correll Buckhalter, whose knees are likely to keep him from getting a lot of other offers. And then there's always Reno Mahe, right?

After that, don't look for much. Donté Stallworth will take his field-stretching speed elsewhere without even fielding an offer from the Eagles, who will consider themselves justified when somebody gives him a Randle El-level deal ($31 million over 7 years with $11.5 million in bonuses). They might bring in some wideout you never heard of, but most likely 2006 training-camp phenom Hank Baskett will become a starter, with Jason Avant competing with Greg Lewis and maybe a draftee for the slot role; it's said to be a good draft for wide receivers.

Further squashing the possibility of excitement is the fact that for once, about two-thirds of the league has more room under the salary cap than the Eagles, although Birds general manager Tom Heckert pointed out last week that the Eagles can create more cap room by converting roster bonuses into signing bonuses. They don't seem to find the market intriguing enough to warrant that, though.

"Free agency's never a great tool to rebuild your team, just because of the money and the guesswork involved," Heckert said last week. "I think it's going to get worse this year, just because everybody's got so much money - there'll be less players available on the market, just because people have the money to tag guys - there's going to be lesser players that make a lot of money just because once it gets into a bidding war, people just have the money to do it. All it takes is one team to make a big offer, and usually, the money starts going high after that."

Position-by-position, the Eagles' situation looks like this:

Quarterback: Jeff Garcia and Koy Detmer are gone. A.J. Feeley will back up Donovan McNabb, with a draftee almost certainly filling the third role. Now that McNabb is 30, it will be interesting to see if the Eagles take a Feeleyesque fifth-round shot in the dark, or if they actually spend a first-day pick on a QB. First round is extremely unlikely. But for now, we know they are unlikely to add a quarterback in free agency.

Running back: This is the most likely area for a free-agent upgrade, especially since Buckhalter's agent, Fletcher Smith, said last weekend he hadn't heard much from the Eagles. They could wait for the draft, and some second-roundish talent like Penn State's Tony Hunt or Rutgers' Brian Leonard, but they'd prefer a veteran, especially a veteran with West Coast offense experience. Ahman Green is unlikely to want to come for the price and the role the Eagles envision, as a complement to Brian Westbrook.

Offensive line: Like the guy guarding the door to the Emerald City said, "Not nobody, not no how!" This is the one spot where the Birds are really flush. They have a highly regarded second-round 2006 draft pick, Winston Justice, who never played a down last season. Even if they, say, end up asking William Thomas to restructure, and trading him if he won't do it, they aren't looking for any free-agent help here.

Defensive line: This is the team's biggest mess and maybe the hardest to fix. The suspicion is that having drafted d-linemen in the first round 3 of the last 4 years, and having signed both Jevon Kearse and Darren Howard to big free-agent deals, the Eagles are just going to hope for better health and more development. Other than re-signing Thomas, they don't seem to be ready to throw more money at this area. But something still seems seriously, strangely wrong. Ever wonder why guys like Derrick Burgess and Hollis Thomas seemed to play better after leaving here?

Linebacker: Yes, everybody except the Eagles seems to know the league is going more to playmaking, big-impact linebackers. No, the Birds don't have any, unless Jeremiah Trotter discovers the fountain of youth. And no, they show absolutely no interest in trying to find one, still. Adalius Thomas? Only if he changes his first name to "Juqua." Maybe in the draft.

Defensive backfield: They'll let nickel corner Rod Hood walk, which could come back to haunt them, especially if Will James either doesn't sign here or gets hurt again. Mike Lewis also is leaving, opening the possibility of a bigger role for just-signed Quintin Mikell. This will be a major area of emphasis in the draft (first-round safety, at 26th overall?), but a significant free-agent signing at corner or safety would be a surprise.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 01, 2007, 10:57:26 AM
Quote from: MURP on March 01, 2007, 10:52:08 AM
And then there's always Reno Mahe, right?

Adalius Thomas? Only if he changes his first name to "Juqua."

Hate.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 01, 2007, 11:04:03 AM
i refuse to believe they arent going to sign a linebacker in free agency and a wide receiver

according to bowen they are going into next year with no additions anywhere except back-up RB?

and without their best WR the QB a huge questionmark and their best DL coming off a terrible knee injury
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Beermonkey on March 01, 2007, 11:20:26 AM
Quote from: MURP on March 01, 2007, 10:52:08 AMBut something still seems seriously, strangely wrong. Ever wonder why guys like Derrick Burgess and Hollis Thomas seemed to play better after leaving here?

Well, for one, the years they played afer they left, were one of they few that they weren't on IR for.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 01, 2007, 11:21:54 AM
BTW, when he talks about how DL's seem to perform better elsewhere, I think it's very obvious why.  The LB's on this team have been awful and do not support the line as they should.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on March 01, 2007, 11:28:56 AM
So which is it, the awful DL is putting too much pressure on the LBs, or the other way around.  I've heard both theories bandied about here.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 01, 2007, 11:31:28 AM
Quote from: Diomedes on March 01, 2007, 11:28:56 AM
So which is it, the awful DL is putting too much pressure on the LBs, or the other way around.  I've heard both theories bandied about here.

I don't think either group has been particularly good, but it does seem that of late, Eagles LB's have had less success on other teams while Eagles DL's have had more.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on March 01, 2007, 11:31:50 AM
They compliment each other
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on March 01, 2007, 11:33:05 AM
Quote from: FFatPatt on March 01, 2007, 11:31:28 AM
Quote from: Diomedes on March 01, 2007, 11:28:56 AM
So which is it, the awful DL is putting too much pressure on the LBs, or the other way around.  I've heard both theories bandied about here.

I don't think either group has been particularly good, but it does seem that of late, Eagles LB's have had less success on other teams while Eagles DL's have had more.


Well, I agree with you there.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: mussa on March 01, 2007, 11:42:55 AM
the problem last year was we got great pressure on QB early, when our offense was clicking...when the offense fizzed out, so did our d-line ad overall defense. the 3 and outs were killing our defense. that all picked up at the end. i think it has to do more from our offensive production and clock management.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 01, 2007, 12:02:14 PM
That couldn't be more wrong.

The defense lost two of the three top CB's and Jevon Kearse in the first couple of games... THAT'S why they stopped getting nearly the same amount of pressure.  Kearse was finally playing out of his mind, and the secondary could actually cover people if Johnson brought pressure.  It didn't last long due to injury, not due to the offense.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on March 01, 2007, 07:08:42 PM
3 pages of Michael Lewis debate...

can't believe I missed it
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on March 03, 2007, 03:52:19 PM
McNabb is at the Syracuse/Villanova game and almost got wiped out by Scottie Reynolds...
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: mussa on March 03, 2007, 03:58:10 PM
Quote from: FFatPatt on March 01, 2007, 12:02:14 PM
That couldn't be more wrong.

The defense lost two of the three top CB's and Jevon Kearse in the first couple of games... THAT'S why they stopped getting nearly the same amount of pressure.  Kearse was finally playing out of his mind, and the secondary could actually cover people if Johnson brought pressure.  It didn't last long due to injury, not due to the offense.


right so, being on the field 70% of the game has no effect on your playing ability. i don't care if you have an all pro defense, if your offense can't produce then you defense has a lot of work to do.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on March 03, 2007, 06:55:54 PM
Why is Jerome McDougle still an Eagle? 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Butchers Bill on March 03, 2007, 06:58:35 PM
Quote from: Diomedes on March 03, 2007, 06:55:54 PM
Why is Jerome McDougle still an Eagle? 

He has some pictures of Joe Banner diddling a little boy.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BlueHeart on March 03, 2007, 07:09:00 PM
 :-D
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on March 04, 2007, 03:12:52 AM
Apparently ESPNRadio mentioned that Cato June is drawing some interest from the Eagles. This was posted on PhilaPhans.com...

Cato June is another tiny LB who gets plowed in run defense. Dude is a cover 2 LB and probably should go back to being a safety.

Bring Ike back. Hell, bring Barber and Ike in.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MDS on March 04, 2007, 03:16:21 AM
So after getting run over by the Saints, the solution is to stand pat on the dline and get smaller linebackers?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on March 04, 2007, 03:25:42 AM
It should say:

After getting run all over by EVERYONE last year...

I am praying for Patrick Willis. Not gonna happen though. No shot.

And even if they did sign June, which I doubt they will, where does he play? Will his 225lb ass be lining up on the strongside? Will Gaither move to SLB?

Although if it meant getting rid of that goddamn idiot #55 I'd pick June over him.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 04, 2007, 05:59:27 AM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on March 04, 2007, 03:12:52 AM
Apparently ESPNRadio mentioned that Cato June is drawing some interest from the Eagles. This was posted on PhilaPhans.com...

Cato June is another tiny LB who gets plowed in run defense. Dude is a cover 2 LB and probably should go back to being a safety.

Bring Ike back. Hell, bring Barber and Ike in.

So, who's to say they don't want him to come play safety?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyGirl on March 04, 2007, 08:14:22 AM
And we all know how accurate ESPN (and their radio station) are with anything Eagles related. LOL
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 04, 2007, 08:56:48 AM
You're right.  Frankly, I'm pretty sure any interest the Eagles have in bringing anyone in is a complete fabrication, and they're content to sit on their hands.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyGirl on March 04, 2007, 08:59:47 AM
My point is just that until someone actually signs, even if he IS at the Novacare complex that day, its all BS.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 04, 2007, 09:05:38 AM
That's obvious.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 04, 2007, 10:01:27 AM
So, who's to say they don't want him to come play safety?

but whos to say he wants to play safety...michael lewis didnt wanna play linebacker
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on March 04, 2007, 10:05:12 AM
Michael Lewis didn't wanna play the pass either.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 04, 2007, 10:11:21 AM
mike nolan and a 10 million dollar sb disagrees with you

like i said before free agency began lewis will sign for big money and play well for someone next year...a team that wont expect him to play deep and cover wr's one on one...a team that wont put him on an island knowing thats not his game and then benching him for doing it...used correctly hes a damn good nfl safety...close to the level of a roy willams but not quite there...keep painting him as a scrub tho and maybe he will become one one day
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on March 04, 2007, 10:47:34 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on March 04, 2007, 10:11:21 AM
mike nolan and a 10 million dollar sb disagrees with you

like i said before free agency began lewis will sign for big money and play well for someone next year...a team that wont expect him to play deep and cover wr's one on one...a team that wont put him on an island knowing thats not his game and then benching him for doing it...used correctly hes a damn good nfl safety...close to the level of a roy willams but not quite there...keep painting him as a scrub tho and maybe he will become one one day

Archuleta got a big deal from the Skins, that doesn't make the Rams wrong for letting him go.

It wouldn't surprise me to see him do well in SF,  but it also wouldn't surprise me if TRUCK_RATHMAN came in here midseason saying he blows in coverage.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 04, 2007, 10:57:26 AM
skins dont count

of course the size of a contract doesnt always mirror the players talent...and i suppose an argument can be made that lewis was overpaid...the 49ers had more money than god this offseason...

my point is the guy is a good nfl player and will do well in sf...the over the top hate for lewis by eagle fans because he had a couple bad games is ridiculous...
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on March 04, 2007, 11:04:39 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on March 04, 2007, 10:57:26 AM
skins dont count

of course the size of a contract doesnt always mirror the players talent...and i suppose an argument can be made that lewis was overpaid...the 49ers had more money than god this offseason...

my point is the guy is a good nfl player and will do well in sf...the over the top hate for lewis by eagle fans because he had a couple bad games is ridiculous...
Lewis was overpaid, but so was Clements. That's the nature of free agency, I suppose.

As for the over the top hatred for Lewis, he was bad in 2005, so most of us thought he'd bounce back (especially since it was a contract year). I feel he didn't. You know how this town is, he let Glenn stroll right by him on a 4th and 26 and had to make a PI to keep him from scoring. Then the next week old ass Horn puts a slight juke on him and he gives up the game winning TD. Thats enough for any town to hate him, but in Philly he sealed his fate.

And just an FYI, I've had a Michael Lewis jersey since his second season, loved the guy. Loved the way he hit, but he was too big a liability, and I'm not just judging that from this season.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on March 04, 2007, 11:11:01 AM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on March 04, 2007, 11:04:39 AM..and I'm not just judging that from this season.
Yes you are.  vigy says so.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Dillen on March 04, 2007, 11:11:46 AM
I'm assuming everyone heard that the Jets are shopping Vilma. Of course it might not be true...but would anyone not trade the 26th pick for him? I'd do it with the quickness.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 04, 2007, 11:13:44 AM
^^^^^
no brainer


vilma>bunkley patterson mcdougle mitchell
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on March 04, 2007, 11:15:01 AM
Quote from: Dillen37 on March 04, 2007, 11:11:46 AM
I'm assuming everyone heard that the Jets are shopping Vilma. Of course it might not be true...but would anyone not trade the 26th pick for him? I'd do it with the quickness.
Yes...he could play any of the 3 LB positions in my opinion. Eagles wouldn't depart from a 1st round pick for anyone, especially a LB.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Magical_Retard on March 04, 2007, 11:17:19 AM
Quote from: Dillen37 on March 04, 2007, 11:11:46 AM
I'm assuming everyone heard that the Jets are shopping Vilma. Of course it might not be true...but would anyone not trade the 26th pick for him? I'd do it with the quickness.

whats the reason? last i heard was that he did not fit into their defense?

i would love to have him.

i noticed ive said "i would love to have him" to many players already. so i know it wont happen.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on March 04, 2007, 11:20:38 AM
I'd trade the 1st round pick and a player for him. Send the Jets Ryan Moats or something.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Magical_Retard on March 04, 2007, 11:21:36 AM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on March 04, 2007, 11:20:38 AM
I'd trade the 1st round pick and a player for him. Send the Jets Ryan Moats or something.

are you nuts? with that 1st round pick we can draft another bust at the Dline.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Dillen on March 04, 2007, 11:32:49 AM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on March 04, 2007, 11:15:01 AM
Yes...he could play any of the 3 LB positions in my opinion. Eagles wouldn't depart from a 1st round pick for anyone, especially a LB.
If something happens, like they were banking on Willis and he's gone, it could happen. It isn't likely though. Maybe something like #26, Rayburn and Moats.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Don Ho on March 04, 2007, 07:28:57 PM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on March 04, 2007, 10:47:34 AM

Archuleta got a big deal from the Skins, that doesn't make the Rams wrong for letting him go.

It wouldn't surprise me to see him do well in SF,  but it also wouldn't surprise me if TRUCK_RATHMAN came in here midseason saying he blows in coverage.

just a few visits from Truck Rathman during the season will probably be the highlight of the 2007 season.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Don Ho on March 04, 2007, 07:35:27 PM
as much shtein as Lelie gets, the local news showed some highlights from last year in Atlanta.  He actually had some incredible catches.  I was shocked.  I had to do a double take and make sure it was #87.  I know he only had one td last year but I have to admit I was impressed.  I always thought he was soft but they showed about 10 highlight reel catches last night.  Even the people in Hawaii have buried this guy.  now that he's in SF the microscope will be even more focused on him in this state.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on March 05, 2007, 12:09:55 AM
If the Jets release Justin McCareins I would hope the Eagles take a look at him.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on March 05, 2007, 12:23:24 AM
Quote from: Don Ho on March 04, 2007, 07:35:27 PM
as much shtein as Lelie gets, the local news showed some highlights from last year in Atlanta.  He actually had some incredible catches.  I was shocked.  I had to do a double take and make sure it was #87.  I know he only had one td last year but I have to admit I was impressed.  I always thought he was soft but they showed about 10 highlight reel catches last night.  Even the people in Hawaii have buried this guy.  now that he's in SF the microscope will be even more focused on him in this state.

Trust me... for every 1 highlight Lelie made this year for the Falcons, he had 10 plays where he didn't give max effort and/or dropped passes.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: General_Failure on March 05, 2007, 12:45:14 AM
C'mon though, 10 highlight reel plays. If he can play a full season he's perfect!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Don Ho on March 05, 2007, 02:18:10 AM
Quote from: General_Failure on March 05, 2007, 12:45:14 AM
C'mon though, 10 highlight reel plays. If he can play a full season he's perfect!

well, highlight reel catches by my sons 10 year old flag football league standards.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: TRUCK RATHMAN on March 05, 2007, 02:27:57 AM
Quote from: EagleFeva on March 05, 2007, 12:23:24 AM
Quote from: Don Ho on March 04, 2007, 07:35:27 PM
as much shtein as Lelie gets, the local news showed some highlights from last year in Atlanta.  He actually had some incredible catches.  I was shocked.  I had to do a double take and make sure it was #87.  I know he only had one td last year but I have to admit I was impressed.  I always thought he was soft but they showed about 10 highlight reel catches last night.  Even the people in Hawaii have buried this guy.  now that he's in SF the microscope will be even more focused on him in this state.

Trust  me... for every 1 highlight Lelie made this year for the Falcons, he had 10 plays where he didn't give max effort and/or dropped passes.

yup, we basically replaced Brandon Lloyd (aka "BLoyd"  the part-time gangstah rappah) with his alligator-armed clone who is not very gangstah at all going over the middle and polishing the lockerroom with his tears. In the streets, I believe its called being a mark ass bustah or punk ass mark. Or perhaps, just a silly bitch. Now I need to find out what the farg happened to tai streets.   ???
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: General_Failure on March 05, 2007, 02:28:51 AM
I believe the term you're looking for is punk mark busta.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on March 06, 2007, 06:44:01 PM
QuoteSt. Louis free-agent wide receiver Shaun McDonald is in Detroit today; the Chargers and Eagles Dolphins and Raiders are also interested in his service.

Doesn't this get you excited?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on March 06, 2007, 07:15:15 PM
I LUV ME SUM RAMS BACKUP WRS
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Father Demon on March 07, 2007, 09:05:49 AM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on March 06, 2007, 06:44:01 PM
QuoteSt. Louis free-agent wide receiver Shaun McDonald is in Detroit today; the Chargers and Eagles Dolphins and Raiders are also interested in his service.

Doesn't this get you excited?

:-D

I live in St. Louis, and I can't remember hearingthis dude's name more than once last season...

GET MCDONALD!!  :crazy
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: hunt on March 11, 2007, 10:48:46 AM
sean mcdonald?
at least curtis would've been a #3 moving up to #2...now they're moving on to #4 wr's.



farg
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 11, 2007, 11:00:49 AM
Offseason update from 2006 --> 2007:

+BETHEL JOHNSON

-DONTE' STALLWORTH
-RODERICK HOOD
-JEFF GARCIA
-MICHAEL LEWIS



Super.  Bowl.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on March 11, 2007, 11:11:57 AM
You forgot that they kept Will Peterson/Will Allen/James William/whatever the farg his name is.  And Juqua.  Negadelphian.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 11, 2007, 11:26:13 AM
Quote from: Diomedes on March 11, 2007, 11:11:57 AM
You forgot that they kept Will Peterson/Will Allen/James William/whatever the farg his name is.  And Juqua.  Negadelphian.

I forgot nothing.  Them signing elsewhere would indicate a net minus, while them re-signing is status quo.  Note that I didn't count any of the FA's currently available as net minuses, like Shawn Barber, Reno Mahe (ha!), or Correll Buckhalter.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on March 11, 2007, 11:26:29 AM
He also forgot the five new starters that Heckert's draft wizardry will surely bring them come April.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on March 11, 2007, 11:31:31 AM
Quote from: FFatPatt on March 11, 2007, 11:26:13 AMI forgot nothing.  Them signing elsewhere would indicate a net minus, while them re-signing is status quo.  Note that I didn't count any of the FA's currently available as net minuses, like Shawn Barber, Reno Mahe (ha!), or Correll Buckhalter.

Methinks your sarcasm detector is on the fritz.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 11, 2007, 11:32:38 AM
+BETHEL JOHNSON
+CHRIS GOCONG

-DONTE' STALLWORTH
-RODERICK HOOD
-JEFF GARCIA
-MICHAEL LEWIS

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 11, 2007, 11:34:36 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on March 11, 2007, 11:32:38 AM
+BETHEL JOHNSON
+CHRIS GOCONG

-DONTE' STALLWORTH
-RODERICK HOOD
-JEFF GARCIA
-MICHAEL LEWIS


Good point.  That being the case, you forgot other young players that either sat on IR all year, simply didn't play, or played like shtein.

+RYAN MOATS
+JEREMY BLOOM
+BRODRICK BUNKLEY
+MAX JEAN-GILLES
+WINSTON JUSTICE
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on March 11, 2007, 11:53:54 AM
+ Chris Gocong = - Dhani Jones

Rip on Gocong all day, but I'll take a farging corpse at SLB before that banjo strumming jitbag loser.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 11, 2007, 12:02:20 PM
im certainly no dhani defender but how can you say youd take gocong over anyone...could he be better than dhani sure...but will he?...unlikely

i mean is that the eagles goal...replacing zesty players with less zesty players...isnt the offseason the time to upgrade positions??...dont we deserve more than that
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on March 11, 2007, 12:10:25 PM
I just want someone else in there. Dude is a ghost on the field. He should have been cut 5 weeks ago
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 11, 2007, 12:11:34 PM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on March 11, 2007, 12:10:25 PM
I just want someone else in there. Dude is a ghost on the field. He should have been cut 5 weeks ago aborted

I'm not in a very giving mood.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on March 11, 2007, 12:24:39 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on March 11, 2007, 12:02:20 PM
i mean is that the eagles goal...replacing zesty players with less zesty players..

replacing zesty players with cheaper zesty players
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 12, 2007, 09:22:49 AM
Domowitch:  What needs to happen for the Eagles to win the Super Bowl (http://www.philly.com/mld/philly/sports/football/16885451.htm)

Funney.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on March 14, 2007, 12:06:52 PM
QuoteRich Hofmann | A lot riding on Brod shoulders




SITTING HERE, wondering how Brodrick Bunkley became the most important Eagles player in 2007...

Tom Heckert was talking

recently about how the Eagles measure themselves against the rest of the NFL, personnelwise. The Eagles' general manager said there are all kinds of ways to do it, and all kinds of ways to manipulate the results if that is what you're looking to do.

Take draft choices. He said, "People talk about if a guy starts as a rookie. That's fine, but what if it's a [bad] team?"

The point is that these evaluations are more art than science. Which brings us to Bunkley, who didn't start, didn't finish, didn't contribute to the Eagles in any way last season, his rookie season as a first-round defensive tackle out of Florida State. But more on that later.

As the Eagles continue along during the free-agent period,

putting everyone to sleep with their inactivity, the main local preoccupation is trying to figure out what the hell they're doing, or not doing. The market for players has shifted in a very big way, with many available dollars chasing fewer good prospects. But that is the market, and that is how markets work, and you choose either to partake or not.

So far, eight teams - including both Super Bowl teams,

Indianapolis and Chicago - have been silent in free agency, except to sign their own players. The Eagles have been almost silent. I mean, if a Bethel Johnson falls in the woods and nobody hears, did he really fall?

We fixate on offense because that is what we do - even though every last one of us knows the Eagles need to fix their run defense first and need to pay more attention to their

defense overall. We have seen the first tangible signs that the Eagles believe this, too, with their tortured and ultimately failed pursuit of Cowboys linebacker Ryan Fowler.

Philosophically, though, the

Eagles' orientation here is clear. That is what Heckert was saying the other day.

"We look at the top teams every year," he said. "We do it from a salary standpoint [and a draft standpoint]. We usually do the top eight teams, the playoff teams, and we say, these teams are spending first-day picks and money on these positions. It goes all over the place.

"Obviously, Indianapolis is a perfect example. They're spending money on offense. They're all offensive money - and it worked out for them this year. [But] you would have to question it before this year. They never made it...

"There's different ways of doing it. We think you have to be good on both sides of the ball. If you can be in the top 10 on both sides of the ball, I think you're good enough. I think we've spent resources on offense, from draft picks and money.

"I think we probably do need to spend some on defense at different positions," Heckert said.

Which is where this thing is headed, except for one thing: the notion that there is an a-ha kind of defensive Mr. Fixit out there challenges the beliefs of most people who pay attention to this kind of stuff. So, yes, the Eagles figure to spend some high draft picks on defense - maybe drafting Brian Dawkins' ultimate replacement at safety, maybe drafting another cornerback, maybe, finally, spending a No. 1 pick on a linebacker. (All right, I'm kidding about that last one.)

But a veteran body who will make a significant impact? A new face in that defensive front seven who will turn this into an adequate run-stopping defense? The Eagles have never been very interested in just trading bodies for bodies, just for the sake of looking busy, and it doesn't appear they'll do a lot of that this year, either.

So it looks like it will have to be Bunkley, or nobody.

You play these what-if games in your head, and try to do these months-off analyses, and you keep coming back to Bunkley. They can't get better if he doesn't get better. The return of Jevon Kearse from his horrific knee injury is not going to make the Eagles a noticeably better run-stopping team. Having middle linebacker Jeremiah Trotter slim down a bit isn't going to make him a better run stopper - because Trotter's problem was usually a guard in his lap, a guard who had just blown through one of the tackles.

You can replace Dhani Jones, with the next Fowler or Chris Gocong or whomever, and that will be fine. But the rest of the fellas are going to be the same fellas who got run over last season so spectacularly - except for Bunkley, who held out of training camp and saw his playing time shrink from tiny to minuscule as the season progressed.

When training camp starts, everybody is going to be watching quarterback Donovan McNabb return from his knee surgery. You really should watch Bunkley instead as he returns from exile. Because with each quietly passing day, it appears he might be the Eagles' biggest move this

offseason.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on March 14, 2007, 04:08:14 PM
Well, at least they're putting the fate of the defense into a sure thing.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 14, 2007, 04:11:43 PM
ha
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on March 14, 2007, 04:13:06 PM
It's a joke that Dhani is going to be on this team next year.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: dis12 on March 14, 2007, 07:48:22 PM
Quote from: King Cole on March 14, 2007, 04:13:06 PM
It's a joke that Dhani is going to be on this team next year.
this almost guarantees we are stuck with banjo-man...
QuoteTexans | S. Barber will visit team Thursday
Tue, 13 Mar 2007 23:05:56 -0700

Megan Manfull, of the Houston Chronicle, reports the Houston Texans will visit with free-agent LB Shawn Barber (Eagles) Thursday, March 15. Barber would likely be signed to provide depth at the outside linebacker position.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on March 14, 2007, 07:52:50 PM
You know things are bad when even Spadaro said Dhani has been a disappointment. I wonder how he'll try to spin this one.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on March 15, 2007, 01:06:11 AM
McNabb to SportsNet New York:  It'd be nice to have a WR that "stayed more than two years."

FIGHT
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on March 15, 2007, 01:10:33 AM
They got rid of Welbourn and TO, but they don't have the balls to get rid of McNabb. McNabb has all the leverage here. They need him, he doesn't need them. 25 other teams would love to have McNabb as their QB and probably would get the weapons he wanted too.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MDS on March 15, 2007, 01:41:42 AM
Quote from: BigEd76 on March 15, 2007, 01:06:11 AM
McNabb to SportsNet New York:  It'd be nice to have a WR that "stayed more than two years."

FIGHT

It's about time he grew a piar of balls and called the front office out on their stupid bullshtein. I know he's the QB and he theoretically, he's throwing the current crop of wideouts under the bus, but who farging cares. Besides Brown, they're a bunch of 4's/
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: General_Failure on March 15, 2007, 02:14:21 AM
One 3, four 4s.


Super. Bowl!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 15, 2007, 06:28:53 AM
McNabb to SportsNet New York:  It'd be nice to have a WR that "stayed more than two years."

to little to late but still real nice to hear...break away donovan get off the island
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: QB Eagles on March 15, 2007, 06:43:32 AM
Quote from: BigEd76 on March 15, 2007, 01:06:11 AM
McNabb to SportsNet New York:  It'd be nice to have a WR that "stayed more than two years."

He's just lobbying for Greg Lewis to become the #1. :puke
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on March 15, 2007, 07:57:53 AM
IGY is on point, i'd rather him come out during FA and say he openly wants Donte back. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: jroceagles on March 15, 2007, 08:00:24 AM
I wish he would have displayed his displeasure 2 weeks ago! 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on March 15, 2007, 10:05:40 AM
Whats up jroc, good to see ya over here.

As far as Ron Dayne goes...

dude is a no good piece of shtein bum. I'd rather have Buck back than him.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 15, 2007, 10:22:09 AM
dude is a no good piece of shtein bum

the winner of our fantasy league last year who picked dayne up a day before the championship disagrees with you
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MURP on March 15, 2007, 12:55:24 PM
Id rather they sign Dorsey Levens than Ron Dayne.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 15, 2007, 01:00:54 PM
Quote from: MURP on March 15, 2007, 12:55:24 PM
Id rather they sign Dorsey Levens than Ron Dayne.

I'd rather Ron Dayne than Fred Lane, tho.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: General_Failure on March 15, 2007, 01:01:24 PM
I'd rather FOX brings back Fastlane.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MDS on March 15, 2007, 01:17:00 PM
Good reference to a horrible show, but kill yourself.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 15, 2007, 01:29:58 PM
What's Tim Biakabatuka up to these days?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyGirl on March 15, 2007, 02:02:24 PM
Chris. Warren.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Mad-Lad on March 15, 2007, 02:13:09 PM
Eric Bieniemy
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on March 15, 2007, 02:47:15 PM
Darnell Autry
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Father Demon on March 15, 2007, 03:16:43 PM
Wilbert Montgomery.

Trump.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on March 15, 2007, 03:33:01 PM
Ya think Herschel Walker's still in shape?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Dillen on March 15, 2007, 04:31:13 PM
Heckert was on Sirius Radio. He reported the Curtis thing so I am really assuming it's true. Also talked about backup RB, mentioned Dayne and Buckhalter. Said there could be a couple of potential trades for LBs.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on March 15, 2007, 07:28:29 PM
Heard that too Dillen. TATEs going wild for Vilma. I'd make that move assuming we don't give up our 1st.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on March 15, 2007, 07:33:04 PM
I'd give up the first and a Rayburn/Walker/Greggie  >:D >:D
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 15, 2007, 07:38:38 PM
vilma for a first is a no brainer....dook is only 25
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Drunkmasterflex on March 15, 2007, 07:42:28 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on March 15, 2007, 07:38:38 PM
vilma for a first is a no brainer....dook is only 25

I make that trade right now. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on March 15, 2007, 07:56:49 PM
I'd give up a 1st for Vilma in a heartbeat... but I know the Eagles wouldn't.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 15, 2007, 09:18:24 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on March 15, 2007, 07:38:38 PM
vilma for a first is a no brainer....dook is only 25

Yes.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on March 15, 2007, 09:39:24 PM
WIP callers talk to Banner on Eskin's show (http://podcast.610wip.com/wip/320053.mp3)

-- Middle of the pack for 2008 cap room and will continue to look at extending their young players
-- Curtis is a quick and very good fast route runner with excellent hands
-- Disagrees that the Eagles don't care about LBs because they took Gardner, McCoy, Gocong and Gaither, re-signed Trotter and signed Dhani  :P
-- Always looking to improve the defensive line but will be looking for Bunkley, Patterson and Cole to get better
-- Pointed out that the Eagles replaced their only missing starter with Curtis and only lost by 3 pts at New Orleans while missing 4 Pro Bowl players
-- Caller named Jeff about 1/3 into the clip decides to attack Banner and his philosophy and wants to know why they're so stubborn and won't change despite spending tons of money and coming up short all the time.  Banner tries to be nice and the guy continues to attack.  Good stuff.
-- On roster continuity, says the Eagles lead the NFL in players re-signing players to 2nd and 3rd deals and points out that the Patriots will have about 7 new starters this year.  Eskin says the perception is that the Patriots are taking a shot while the Eagles aren't.  Banner disagrees and points out that the Patriots rarely spend in free agency and rarely re-sign their own players so this offseason is a rarity, then he points out that the Colts and Bears did almost nothing in free agency last year.
-- Says the Eagles aren't opposed to getting big name players (brings up Vincent, Fryar, Runyan, Kearse and TO) but have to be selective about it.
-- On Adalius Thomas and Joey Porter, says those guys can't fit into a 4-3 defense and other teams running 4-3 defenses agree.  Sometimes it's all about the scheme you're running and brings up Curtis vs. Stallworth and how some think Curtis will fit into the Eagles offense better.  "Right role for the right player"
-- Hopes to get a backup RB soon, whether it's Dayne, Buckhalter or someone else.  Moats will still be in the mix.  Says size doesn't matter and would rather have a "good back" than a "big back".  Says free agent RBs won't come here because they know their options will be limited because of Westbrook.  Dayne decision could be within 24 hours.
-- Wouldn't answer a question about another RB visiting (which seems to indicate that Brown or someone else is coming in)
-- Says Reid is doing great and thanked the people that sent cards and get well wishes
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on March 15, 2007, 09:48:54 PM
QuoteSays free agent RBs won't come here because they know their options will be limited because of Westbrook.

oh christ.  it's that simple, huh??
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Magical_Retard on March 15, 2007, 09:49:54 PM
Quote from: BigEd76 on March 15, 2007, 09:39:24 PM
WIP callers talk to Banner on Eskin's show (http://podcast.610wip.com/wip/320053.mp3)

-- Middle of the pack for 2008 cap room and will continue to look at extending their young players
-- Curtis is a quick and very good fast route runner with excellent hands
-- Disagrees that the Eagles don't care about LBs because they took Gardner, McCoy, Gocong and Gaither, re-signed Trotter and signed Dhani  :P
-- Always looking to improve the defensive line but will be looking for Bunkley, Patterson and Cole to get better
-- Pointed out that the Eagles replaced their only missing starter with Curtis and only lost by 3 pts at New Orleans while missing 4 Pro Bowl players
-- Caller named Jeff about 1/3 into the clip decides to attack Banner and his philosophy and wants to know why they're so stubborn and won't change despite spending tons of money and coming up short all the time.  Banner tries to be nice and the guy continues to attack.  Good stuff.
-- On roster continuity, says the Eagles lead the NFL in players re-signing players to 2nd and 3rd deals and points out that the Patriots will have about 7 new starters this year.  Eskin says the perception is that the Patriots are taking a shot while the Eagles aren't.  Banner disagrees and points out that the Patriots rarely spend in free agency and rarely re-sign their own players so this offseason is a rarity, then he points out that the Colts and Bears did almost nothing in free agency last year.
-- Says the Eagles aren't opposed to getting big name players (brings up Vincent, Fryar, Runyan, Kearse and TO) but have to be selective about it.
-- On Adalius Thomas and Joey Porter, says those guys can't fit into a 4-3 defense and other teams running 4-3 defenses agree.  Sometimes it's all about the scheme you're running and brings up Curtis vs. Stallworth and how some think Curtis will fit into the Eagles offense better.  "Right role for the right player"
-- Hopes to get a backup RB soon, whether it's Dayne, Buckhalter or someone else.  Moats will still be in the mix.  Says size doesn't matter and would rather have a "good back" than a "big back".  Says free agent RBs won't come here because they know their options will be limited because of Westbrook.  Dayne decision could be within 24 hours.
-- Wouldn't answer a question about another RB visiting (which seems to indicate that Brown or someone else is coming in)
-- Says Reid is doing great and thanked the people that sent cards and get well wishes


oh god i really we do not sign dayne. i might be in the minority but i think if we actually handed the ball off to westbrook or buckhalter on 3rd and 1s they would have a better chance at that 1 yd than dayne.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on March 15, 2007, 09:52:10 PM
Quote from: BigEd76 on March 15, 2007, 09:39:24 PM
WIP callers talk to Banner on Eskin's show (http://podcast.610wip.com/wip/320053.mp3)

-- Middle of the pack for 2008 cap room and will continue to look at extending their young players
-- Pointed out that the Eagles replaced their only missing starter with Curtis and only lost by 3 pts at New Orleans while missing 4 Pro Bowl players

Middle of the pack is fine considering there isn't many young players on the roster they'll want to sign to long term deals.

Was your second point a typo? McNabb, Kearse?

I heard part of the interview, he didn't sound as smug as he usually does.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on March 15, 2007, 09:53:16 PM
McNabb, Kearse, Sheppard, Andrews
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on March 15, 2007, 09:54:48 PM
Andrews played until the 3rd if memory serves me correct. When did Lito miss time?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on March 15, 2007, 09:56:23 PM
Dislocated his elbow in the Giants game

Andrews left in the 2nd quarter
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on March 15, 2007, 09:59:17 PM
Quote from: BigEd76 on March 15, 2007, 09:56:23 PM
Dislocated his elbow in the Giants game

Andrews left in the 2nd quarter
St00pid me
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on March 15, 2007, 10:00:24 PM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on March 15, 2007, 09:59:17 PM
Quote from: BigEd76 on March 15, 2007, 09:56:23 PM
Dislocated his elbow in the Giants game

Andrews left in the 2nd quarter
St00pid me

You only forgot because of the 9,743 beers you drank at the tailgate.

Don't feel bad.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on March 15, 2007, 10:02:57 PM
SD's myspace says that something else was on his mind in early January  :-D  :yay


FYI, Westbrook will be on NFL Total Access tomorrow night at 7PM
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: QB Eagles on March 15, 2007, 10:22:53 PM
Love how Banner goes back to Vincent and Fryar for examples of signing big free agents. Surprised he didn't throw Ricky Watters into the mix.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MDS on March 15, 2007, 10:48:18 PM
How did they let Reggie White go!!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on March 15, 2007, 11:50:58 PM
More from Banner:

Curtis stuff, plus a response to McNabb's remark in New York (http://philadelphia.comcastsportsnet.com/media/video/eagles/031507-banner.wmv)

Offense, plus a response to Stallworth being disrespected (http://philadelphia.comcastsportsnet.com/media/video/eagles/031507-banner2.wmv)

Banner also said that if Stallworth/Rosenhaus came back to the Eagles with the same offer the Patriots made, they would have matched it.  Rosenhaus never came back.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on March 16, 2007, 11:31:21 AM
Quote from: Jerome99RIP on March 15, 2007, 10:00:24 PM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on March 15, 2007, 09:59:17 PM
Quote from: BigEd76 on March 15, 2007, 09:56:23 PM
Dislocated his elbow in the Giants game

Andrews left in the 2nd quarter
St00pid me

You only forgot because of the 9,743 beers you drank at the tailgate.

Don't feel bad.

That too

Quote from: BigEd76 on March 15, 2007, 10:02:57 PM
SD's myspace says that something else was on his mind in early January  :-D  :yay

Oct. 7th (due date)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on March 16, 2007, 12:00:07 PM
Quote from: BigEd76 on March 15, 2007, 11:50:58 PM
Banner also said that if Stallworth/Rosenhaus came back to the Eagles with the same offer the Patriots made, they would have matched it.  Rosenhaus never came back.

I call BS on that one.

Word on Stallworth's offer from the Patriots was out there for almost a week before he signed it.  If they wanted to match the offer, they had plenty of time to do so.  All it would have taken is a little proactive phone call to Rosenhaus or even Donte to confirm the offer.  Don't even leave it in Rosenhaus' hands to "come back".  I wouldn't think that'd be too much trouble over a player you were seriously interested in keeping.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 16, 2007, 12:01:37 PM
Love how Banner goes back to Vincent and Fryar for examples of signing big free agents

yeah i was completely baffled by that as well

i think banner loves having the free agency argument because it over shadows their player personel mistakes...he gets to bring the argument to the fact that they sign tons of their own players vs going out in free agency but never the issue of should those young players be resigned...just because you resign a player doesnt automatically mean that player is good...and banner has done an excellent job in spinning it to mean that...
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on March 16, 2007, 12:05:16 PM
yeah, the blanket statement that they sign more players to 2nd and 3rd contracts implies that the picks were correct to begin with, which isn't always correct.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 16, 2007, 12:06:57 PM
Quote from: SunMo on March 16, 2007, 12:05:16 PM
yeah, the blanket statement that they sign more players to 2nd and 3rd contracts implies that the picks were correct to begin with, which isn't always correct.

Sean Considine's about due for an extension through 2018.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on March 16, 2007, 12:08:07 PM
the white revolution continues
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: QB Eagles on March 16, 2007, 12:09:55 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on March 16, 2007, 12:01:37 PM
he gets to bring the argument to the fact that they sign tons of their own players vs going out in free agency but never the issue of should those young players be resigned...just because you resign a player doesnt automatically mean that player is good...and banner has done an excellent job in spinning it to mean that...

Kinda like this:

Quote from: BigEd76 on March 15, 2007, 09:39:24 PM
-- Disagrees that the Eagles don't care about LBs because they took Gardner, McCoy, Gocong and Gaither, re-signed Trotter and signed Dhani  :P

The "if we don't care about the LB position why do we have some LBs on our team?" argument. It's not the quantity of LBs that concerns us, Joe!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 16, 2007, 12:12:28 PM
exactly

i mean the point of free agency is the notion that youre going out and getting an already proven player...of course it doesnt always work out but the odds are in your favor...certainly vs trying to transform a division II engineering defensive end into a sam
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: NGM on March 16, 2007, 01:58:29 PM
Quote from: QB Eagles on March 16, 2007, 12:09:55 PM

Kinda like this:

Quote from: BigEd76 on March 15, 2007, 09:39:24 PM
-- Disagrees that the Eagles don't care about LBs because they took Gardner, McCoy, Gocong and Gaither, re-signed Trotter and signed Dhani  :P

The "if we don't care about the LB position why do we have some LBs on our team?" argument. It's not the quantity of LBs that concerns us, Joe!

Ewww, thats kinda like saying what about all the good things Hitler did.  Shut up Joe.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on March 16, 2007, 02:10:40 PM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on March 16, 2007, 11:31:21 AMOct. 7th (due date)

My birthday.  congrats
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on March 16, 2007, 02:32:43 PM
Quote from: BigEd76 on March 16, 2007, 02:10:40 PM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on March 16, 2007, 11:31:21 AMOct. 7th (due date)

My birthday.  congrats

Thanks. I hadn't considered Ed as a name until just now
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on March 16, 2007, 03:02:11 PM
How about Judas? 

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 16, 2007, 03:03:09 PM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on March 16, 2007, 02:32:43 PM
Quote from: BigEd76 on March 16, 2007, 02:10:40 PM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on March 16, 2007, 11:31:21 AMOct. 7th (due date)

My birthday.  congrats

Thanks. I hadn't considered Ed as a name until just now

Only if it's a girl.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on March 16, 2007, 03:23:49 PM
Quote from: Diomedes on March 16, 2007, 03:02:11 PM
How about Judas? 
Doesn't go well with my last name
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 16, 2007, 03:28:11 PM
Priest?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on March 16, 2007, 10:54:35 PM
I should have posted this earlier, but just a heads up if you care...

NFL Total Access is doing (or did) the "State of the Eagles" tonight.  It aired at 7pm, but it re-airs all through the night and into the morning so you can probably catch a repeat.

I haven't seen it yet but should be interesting.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 17, 2007, 11:04:38 AM
QuoteTexans | Team re-signs Dayne
Sat, 17 Mar 2007 07:22:01 -0700

Megan Manfull, of the Houston Chronicle, reports the Houston Texans have re-signed RB Ron Dayne. Financial terms of the deal were not disclosed.

Dammit!

Ha.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: hbionic on March 17, 2007, 11:06:27 AM
Correction: its 'dam-nit'.

:CF

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: troyhstewart on March 18, 2007, 09:11:11 AM
Quote from: EagleFeva on March 16, 2007, 10:54:35 PM
I should have posted this earlier, but just a heads up if you care...

NFL Total Access is doing (or did) the "State of the Eagles" tonight.  It aired at 7pm, but it re-airs all through the night and into the morning so you can probably catch a repeat.

I haven't seen it yet but should be interesting.

Marshall was on the Rams with Curtis, so he loved that signing. He also mentioned our 3 biggest needs heading into the draft are all on defense- CB, SS, LB.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Zanshin on March 18, 2007, 09:48:35 AM
Quote from: FastFreddie on March 17, 2007, 11:04:38 AM
QuoteTexans | Team re-signs Dayne
Sat, 17 Mar 2007 07:22:01 -0700

Megan Manfull


That name never gets old.  I'm sure she didn't catch any abuse for that at all as a kid.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyGirl on March 18, 2007, 04:24:30 PM
Quote from: Zanshin on March 18, 2007, 09:48:35 AM
Quote from: FastFreddie on March 17, 2007, 11:04:38 AM
QuoteTexans | Team re-signs Dayne
Sat, 17 Mar 2007 07:22:01 -0700

Megan Manfull


That name never gets old.  I'm sure she didn't catch any abuse for that at all as a kid.

lol, I was just going to post something similar to that.  :-D
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on March 18, 2007, 11:48:14 PM
Didn't see this posted anywhere, and I guess this thread is as good as any.

http://insider.espn.go.com/espn/blog/index?name=williamson_matt&univLogin02=stateChanged

It's from ESPN Insider so here's the article.  It was written by Matt Williamson, which is apparently Dave Spadaro's non-EMB pen name. 

QuoteEagles on the right track

As of this writing, Philadelphia is the best team in the NFC East -- assuming Donovan McNabb comes back strong. The NFC is there for the taking and Philadelphia very well could be the team to take advantage of the conference's mediocrity in 2007. The Eagles finished the 2006 season strongly, until losing a tight game in New Orleans in the second round of the playoffs. The Eagles should be back next year in a big way.
Although they started slowly in free agency, the Eagles recently landed WR Kevin Curtis, a major addition to their offense and a replacement for Donte' Stallworth. Curtis is a great fit. He is very smart and will adjust to the offense quickly.

He has underrated speed and is good with the ball in his hands. Philadelphia could probably use another wide receiver, but Reggie Brown is primed to take another step forward in his development and the coaches are also high on their younger guys. They also brought back RB Correll Buckhalter to take some pressure off star RB Brian Westbrook. Philadelphia also boasts a strong offensive line.

This combination, along with exceptional coaching and play calling makes the entire unit efficient and dangerous. Usually a pass-happy offense, only seven teams had more passing attempts per game than Philadelphia did in 2006. The Eagles also averaged 4.8 yards per carry and got excellent offensive production late in games. This shows their improved offensive balance and great timing calling run plays. The Eagles were outstanding on first downs and also in third-and-long situations.

As long as McNabb comes back and isn't hindered by his injury, the Eagles will be in great shape on offense, but there are a few areas they could still look to strengthen on draft day. The Eagles could use a developmental quarterback in the middle rounds to groom as McNabb's backup. Drafting a big, strong runner to compete with the injury-prone Buckhalter also makes a lot of sense. Someone like Tony Hunt, Brian Leonard or Chris Henry could catch their eye in the second round.

Also, if the right receiver is there, the Eagles still could pull the trigger on a player like Robert Meachem, Anthony Gonzalez, Craig Davis, Sidney Rice, Steve Smith or Jason Hill with their top two picks. Meachem in particular could be too enticing to pass up with the 26th pick in round one. As far as their offensive needs go, they are in an enviable position now where they will not have to reach for any specific area and can just pounce on a player who presents excellent value.

The outlook on defense isn't as rosy, but the unit should be improved from last season. The Eagles simply must do a better job against the run and surely will address this issue in the draft. They allowed 136.4 yards per game on the ground, and 4.5 yards per carry in 2006.

The loss of DE Jevon Kearse forced Philadelphia's other defensive ends to play too many snaps and also hurt from a pure pass-rushing standpoint. MLB Jeremiah Trotter is aging and isn't the player he once was. He has less range and overall playmaking ability than ever.

Philadelphia's 2006 first-round pick, DT Brodrick Bunkley, struggled to get playing time and contributed very little. He is a very talented player who the Eagles absolutely must get more from in 2007. If he develops as they hoped he would when they drafted him, Bunkley and Mike Patterson could be a very disruptive interior duo.

Bunkley's development also would lighten Patterson's load, and keep the smaller defensive tackle fresh. This defense needs more playmakers overall, as FS Brian Dawkins might be the only guy who consistently makes the big play.

The Eagles need at least one linebacker, depth in their secondary, and if the right guy is available, another pass rushing defensive end to use in their rotation. Anthony Spencer or Jarvis Moss might be right up their alley and would fit right in without having to play a ton of snaps in their rookie season.

Philadelphia should have plenty of options at linebacker. They are not pigeonholed into taking an outside or inside guy, and they could probably use one of each. In the top rounds of the draft, expect them to pursue guys such as MLB Patrick Willis, who should already be gone, Brandon Siler and David Harris.

Outside linebackers who might spark some interest include Lawrence Timmons, Paul Posluszny, John Beason and Rufus Alexander. The Eagles always put a premium on the cornerback position and could snatch up someone like Aaron Ross or Darrelle Revis in round one, even though they don't necessarily need a starting corner. A bigger safety like Sabby Piscitelli or Aaron Rouse would be a nice addition to use near the line of scrimmage, provide depth and contribute immediately on special teams.

The Eagles might also look for a stout run-plugging defensive tackle in the middle rounds. With the exception of needing a playmaking linebacker, the Eagles will be patient and take the player highest on their board, instead of reaching for need.

Overall, this is an excellent organization with bright, proven decision makers and a strong talent base. They are in very good shape for this time of the year and have an opportunity to improve upon their impressive 2006 season. Of course, if McNabb is watching from the sidelines, all of this could be for not. But, as it stands, Philadelphia looks like a playoff team and maybe much more.

The last line did it for me.  Mostly because of the "as it stands" part.  This team, as it stands, is not much more than a playoff team.  This team, as it stands, isn't even a lock to make the playoffs.  This team, as it stands, couldn't even attract an undrafted, special teams playing linebacker. 

In order for this team to really bolster up it's defense, which sucks, it's going to have to pull off one hell of a blockbuster trade to get Briggs and/or have an absolute "can't miss" draft.  The thought of either happening makes me laugh hard enough to pee. 

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 19, 2007, 11:33:52 AM
Funney.

QuoteAngelo Cataldi, meet Emily Post.

Cataldi, the WIP (610) morning host who led the boos against Donovan McNabb when the Eagles drafted him in 1999, showed up for dinner at the Water Works restaurant off Kelly Drive two weeks ago with his wife, Gail; the show's Rhea Hughes, and Hughes' husband, Joseph.

In came McNabb and his family, passing Cataldi and Hughes on their way to another dining room.

Cataldi says he and tablemates debated sending over a round of drinks - when owner Michael Karloutsos told him, "Mr. McNabb wants to buy you a round."

"Oh, did we look like idiots," Cataldi says, adding that debate then ensued over how to thank him.

Cataldi went over to McNabb's table. "He was very much a gentleman," says Cataldi, "and I was Barney Fife, stammering and getting tongue-tied."

Hughes asked management what the McNabbs were drinking. It was a "nice champagne," says Cataldi - $210 a bottle. "Rhea pays for the whole thing herself, but even that's not enough. She wrote them a note: 'Thanks for keeping us employed.' "

Cataldi says he was later told that McNabb asked: "What does that mean?"

"We couldn't have screwed this up any more than we did," says Cataldi. "I felt like the biggest social moron that ever walked the earth."
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyGirl on March 19, 2007, 11:47:53 AM
Quote"We couldn't have screwed this up any more than we did," says Cataldi. "I felt like the biggest social moron that ever walked the earth."

Pretty much sums him up.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: jroceagles on March 19, 2007, 12:00:57 PM
Quote from: Sgt PSN on March 18, 2007, 11:48:14 PM
Didn't see this posted anywhere, and I guess this thread is as good as any.

http://insider.espn.go.com/espn/blog/index?name=williamson_matt&univLogin02=stateChanged

It's from ESPN Insider so here's the article.  It was written by Matt Williamson, which is apparently Dave Spadaro's non-EMB pen name. 

QuoteEagles on the right track

As of this writing, Philadelphia is the best team in the NFC East -- assuming Donovan McNabb comes back strong. The NFC is there for the taking and Philadelphia very well could be the team to take advantage of the conference's mediocrity in 2007. The Eagles finished the 2006 season strongly, until losing a tight game in New Orleans in the second round of the playoffs. The Eagles should be back next year in a big way.
Although they started slowly in free agency, the Eagles recently landed WR Kevin Curtis, a major addition to their offense and a replacement for Donte' Stallworth. Curtis is a great fit. He is very smart and will adjust to the offense quickly.

He has underrated speed and is good with the ball in his hands. Philadelphia could probably use another wide receiver, but Reggie Brown is primed to take another step forward in his development and the coaches are also high on their younger guys. They also brought back RB Correll Buckhalter to take some pressure off star RB Brian Westbrook. Philadelphia also boasts a strong offensive line.

This combination, along with exceptional coaching and play calling makes the entire unit efficient and dangerous. Usually a pass-happy offense, only seven teams had more passing attempts per game than Philadelphia did in 2006. The Eagles also averaged 4.8 yards per carry and got excellent offensive production late in games. This shows their improved offensive balance and great timing calling run plays. The Eagles were outstanding on first downs and also in third-and-long situations.

As long as McNabb comes back and isn't hindered by his injury, the Eagles will be in great shape on offense, but there are a few areas they could still look to strengthen on draft day. The Eagles could use a developmental quarterback in the middle rounds to groom as McNabb's backup. Drafting a big, strong runner to compete with the injury-prone Buckhalter also makes a lot of sense. Someone like Tony Hunt, Brian Leonard or Chris Henry could catch their eye in the second round.

Also, if the right receiver is there, the Eagles still could pull the trigger on a player like Robert Meachem, Anthony Gonzalez, Craig Davis, Sidney Rice, Steve Smith or Jason Hill with their top two picks. Meachem in particular could be too enticing to pass up with the 26th pick in round one. As far as their offensive needs go, they are in an enviable position now where they will not have to reach for any specific area and can just pounce on a player who presents excellent value.

The outlook on defense isn't as rosy, but the unit should be improved from last season. The Eagles simply must do a better job against the run and surely will address this issue in the draft. They allowed 136.4 yards per game on the ground, and 4.5 yards per carry in 2006.

The loss of DE Jevon Kearse forced Philadelphia's other defensive ends to play too many snaps and also hurt from a pure pass-rushing standpoint. MLB Jeremiah Trotter is aging and isn't the player he once was. He has less range and overall playmaking ability than ever.

Philadelphia's 2006 first-round pick, DT Brodrick Bunkley, struggled to get playing time and contributed very little. He is a very talented player who the Eagles absolutely must get more from in 2007. If he develops as they hoped he would when they drafted him, Bunkley and Mike Patterson could be a very disruptive interior duo.

Bunkley's development also would lighten Patterson's load, and keep the smaller defensive tackle fresh. This defense needs more playmakers overall, as FS Brian Dawkins might be the only guy who consistently makes the big play.

The Eagles need at least one linebacker, depth in their secondary, and if the right guy is available, another pass rushing defensive end to use in their rotation. Anthony Spencer or Jarvis Moss might be right up their alley and would fit right in without having to play a ton of snaps in their rookie season.

Philadelphia should have plenty of options at linebacker. They are not pigeonholed into taking an outside or inside guy, and they could probably use one of each. In the top rounds of the draft, expect them to pursue guys such as MLB Patrick Willis, who should already be gone, Brandon Siler and David Harris.

Outside linebackers who might spark some interest include Lawrence Timmons, Paul Posluszny, John Beason and Rufus Alexander. The Eagles always put a premium on the cornerback position and could snatch up someone like Aaron Ross or Darrelle Revis in round one, even though they don't necessarily need a starting corner. A bigger safety like Sabby Piscitelli or Aaron Rouse would be a nice addition to use near the line of scrimmage, provide depth and contribute immediately on special teams.

The Eagles might also look for a stout run-plugging defensive tackle in the middle rounds. With the exception of needing a playmaking linebacker, the Eagles will be patient and take the player highest on their board, instead of reaching for need.

Overall, this is an excellent organization with bright, proven decision makers and a strong talent base. They are in very good shape for this time of the year and have an opportunity to improve upon their impressive 2006 season. Of course, if McNabb is watching from the sidelines, all of this could be for not. But, as it stands, Philadelphia looks like a playoff team and maybe much more.

The last line did it for me.  Mostly because of the "as it stands" part.  This team, as it stands, is not much more than a playoff team.  This team, as it stands, isn't even a lock to make the playoffs.  This team, as it stands, couldn't even attract an undrafted, special teams playing linebacker. 

In order for this team to really bolster up it's defense, which sucks, it's going to have to pull off one hell of a blockbuster trade to get Briggs and/or have an absolute "can't miss" draft.  The thought of either happening makes me laugh hard enough to pee. 



In the NFC..this team "as it stands" is VERY much a playoff team!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 19, 2007, 12:06:23 PM
Like I said - it's a good thing that the Eagles wouldn't have to beat an AFC team to win a Super Bowl!

Oops.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: jroceagles on March 19, 2007, 12:41:33 PM
Quote from: FastFreddie on March 19, 2007, 12:06:23 PM
Like I said - it's a good thing that the Eagles wouldn't have to beat an AFC team to win a Super Bowl!

Oops.
we would have to but the arguement was that we are not a playoff team
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhanInDC on March 19, 2007, 02:06:37 PM
Just saw some of the offseason conditioning pics on PE.com

(http://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/uploads/photos/perm/main/IIPKMNACBEMK/ocw_2.jpg)

Max-Jean Gilles is a beast. Look at the size of that dude. So long Manneans.

The thought of the Birds drafting a big back (Brian Leonard) and having him and Westy lined up behind Andrews, Gilles, Jackson, Runyan, and Thomas/Justice gives me football wood. Imagine the passes to the flats!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 19, 2007, 02:09:26 PM
Ha.  The exact pic I was just about to post.  He makes Shawn Andrews look like Todd Pinkston.

Also... KILLA:

(http://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/uploads/photos/perm/main/IIPKMNACBEMK/ocw_3.jpg)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on March 19, 2007, 02:10:28 PM
MJG could eat Andrews
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on March 19, 2007, 02:14:12 PM
quick, induce a heart attack for one of MJG's friends so he'll lose weight and get ripped
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhanInDC on March 19, 2007, 02:17:14 PM
Quote from: Seabiscuit36 on March 19, 2007, 02:10:28 PM
MJG could eat Andrews

Actually Andrews isn't that small compared to MJG. MJG is 6'3" and 350, Andrews is 6'4" and 340.

Quote from: SunMo on March 19, 2007, 02:14:12 PM
quick, induce a heart attack for one of MJG's friends so he'll lose weight and get ripped

MJG doesn't look anything like Andrews did when he showed up fat as hell a couple years back.

(http://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/uploads/photos/perm/main/GAIBKBKEAMAP/july29_TC4.jpg)
Look at the farging kid behind MJG. Holy shtein!

(http://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/uploads/photos/perm/main/IMBODBLKMILA/lineman2_060601.jpg)

Scott Young = Bitchmade

(http://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/uploads/photos/perm/main/IIPKMNACBEMK/ocw_1.jpg)

I'm thinking Akers probably feels the same way I do when I walk into a Gold's Gym.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 19, 2007, 02:20:01 PM
Quote from: PPinDC on March 19, 2007, 02:17:14 PM
Actually Andrews isn't that small compared to MJG. MJG is 6'3" and 350, Andrews is 6'4" and 340.

MJG is LISTED at 350, which means precisely nothing.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MURP on March 19, 2007, 02:23:24 PM
Akers going nuts with a 135 squat. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 19, 2007, 02:42:33 PM
He doesn't want to overwork that hammy.  We'd have to trade for Simoneau to do our kicking again.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: dis12 on March 19, 2007, 03:14:40 PM
don't know if this was posted or not...kinda same 'ol story...
QuoteThe Philadelphia Eagles came into the off-season with a list of things to accomplish. Thanks to re-signing some of their own free agents and making a couple of other moves, they're narrowing down their list.

With 21 of 22 starters from last year's NFC East title team under contract, the Eagles have kept a low profile so far in the early days of the free agency signing period.
They re-signed four of their own unrestricted free agents - running back Correll Buckhalter, safety Quintin Mikell, defensive end Juqua Thomas and cornerback William James - and have added two players in wide receiver/kick returner Bethel Johnson and wide receiver Kevin Curtis. The additions at wideout helped greatly to relieve the loss of Donte Stallworth who signed with New England.

Stallworth was the only '06 starter not under contract and while the Eagles were interested in him, they eventually found other options and passed. The Eagles, like other teams, were concerned about Stallworth showing up on the list of players who were one step away from a suspension for substance abuse woes.

Even before the Eagles signed Curtis, general manager Tom Heckert has insisted his wide receiving corps would be fine without Stallworth. The addition of Curtis makes that corps even stronger and Johnson could help too.

Next on the list was running back and the Eagles looked around at the likes of Ron Dayne, but stayed in-house and re-signed Correll Buckhalter to serve as a backup Brian Westbrook. The Eagles also are in the market for a veteran linebacker who could possibly compete for a starting job or replace free agent Shawn Barber as the nickel linebacker.

Assuming they accomplish those things in free agency prior to the draft, their top priorities in the draft will be bolstering their secondary and possibly finding an eventual replacement for middle linebacker Jeremiah Trotter, whose knees have begun to betray him.

Safety is a concern. Free safety Brian Dawkins is 33 and the jury still is very much out on strong safety Sean Considine. Starting cornerback Sheldon Brown probably is better suited to be the team's nickel back, but the Eagles need to find another top cover guy, either as Brown's starting replacement or to compete with James for the nickel job.

While the local sports talk shows have been hammering them for sitting on their hands since the start of the free agent signing period, the Eagles insist they are pleased with the way the off-season is going.

After all, with 21 of their 22 starters from last season under contract for 2007, the Eagles didn't feel the need to be very active in free agency.

"We're happy with what we've done so far," general manager Tom Heckert said. "We wanted to lock up our own guys and we did that. We don't worry about outside perceptions."
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Don Ho on March 19, 2007, 03:27:11 PM
Quote from: hbionic on March 17, 2007, 11:06:27 AM
Correction: its 'dam-nit'.

:CF



no, I think it's "THANK YOU GOD!"
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 19, 2007, 05:40:14 PM
off-season conditioning program (http://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/homeNewsDetail.jsp?id=66319)

QuoteDefensive tackle Brodrick Bunkley and linebacker Chris Gocong were among a number of second-year players and selected veterans on hand Monday as the team's off-season conditioning program officially got underway.

Good.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Magical_Retard on March 19, 2007, 06:39:19 PM
the article claims sheldon brown is best suited to be a nickel back? how about hes best suited to be not left alone on tall ass WRs while the rest of the team blitzes.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Wingspan on March 19, 2007, 06:56:16 PM
Quote from: Magical_Retard on March 19, 2007, 06:39:19 PM
the article claims sheldon brown is best suited to be a nickel back? how about hes best suited to be not left alone on tall ass WRs while the rest of the team blitzes.

Actually, I think Sheldon said himself he plays best when covering the slot guy.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on March 19, 2007, 07:07:46 PM
Quote from: Wingspan on March 19, 2007, 06:56:16 PM
Quote from: Magical_Retard on March 19, 2007, 06:39:19 PM
the article claims sheldon brown is best suited to be a nickel back? how about hes best suited to be not left alone on tall ass WRs while the rest of the team blitzes.

Actually, I think Sheldon said himself he plays best when covering the slot guy.


I think he's best suited as the FS for the next 7 years
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on March 19, 2007, 10:11:32 PM
He can hit..that's a fact.  He's sometimes not so great at wrapping up.  Sounds like a FS to me.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: dis12 on March 19, 2007, 10:29:15 PM
Quote from: Diomedes on March 19, 2007, 10:11:32 PM
He can hit..that's a fact.  He's sometimes not so great at wrapping up.  Sounds like a FS to me.
so with Brown and Mickell both "recommended" as safeties, it's even more likely we go cornerback on draft day 1.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on March 19, 2007, 11:19:08 PM
Comcast Sportsnet has us taking Anthony Spencer from Purdue in the first round.


Quote26. Philadelphia: Anthony Spencer, DE/LB, Purdue, 6-3/260
Although the Birds have needs at linebacker and safety, they can always use another pure pass-rusher. Jevon Kearse turns 31 in September and is returning from a knee injury. Darren Howard is coming off a mediocre 2006. The Eagles can't rely on just Trent Cole and Juqua Thomas to pressure the QB. Spencer was athletic enough to play both end and linebacker for Purdue. Someone with that kind of versatility could be utilized by Jim Johnson.


He's a hybrid LB/DE.  Swear to farging God.

:paranoid
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: hbionic on March 20, 2007, 02:31:59 AM
Quote from: Jerome99RIP on March 19, 2007, 11:19:08 PM
He's a hybrid LB/DE.  Swear to farging God.

:paranoid


:-D :-D :-D



:'(
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Don Ho on March 20, 2007, 05:59:34 AM
well whatya know!  As I asked in the "College Players Eagles Are Interested In" thread:

QuoteWhat does anyone know about Anthony Spencer DE from Purdue?  I remember when Purdue was out here in November and Hawaii was constantly double teaming the guy.  I had never heard of him until the Boilermakers played here but the local radio broadcasters said the Warriors were scared shteinless of this guy.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 20, 2007, 10:33:30 AM
i can see the "sheldon sucks at corner" seeds already being planted...a small wave at first it will turn into a tsunami by the time training camp rolls around

the guy is a good cb...its hard to find quality nfl cb's and you dont move one of them to safety just because some article said so

will he one day in the latter part of his career be a better safety?...perhaps...but right now that would be an assinine move
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on March 20, 2007, 11:00:29 AM
We dont have anyone to backfill the CB spot so it doesnt make sense.  If they did grab a FA stud CB it would make sense though.  People forget Sheldon has been injured the past 2 seasons and doesnt whine about his injuries affecting his play, he just goes out there. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: General_Failure on March 20, 2007, 11:05:43 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on March 20, 2007, 10:33:30 AM
the guy is a good cb...its hard to find quality nfl cb's and you dont move one of them to safety just because some article said so

I could see him finishing up his career somewhere playing safety.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 20, 2007, 11:15:17 AM
i could too but im saying right now it would be retarded to move him to safety...yet im starting to hear and read rumblings about it and its actually gaining a foothold amongst eagle fans and its gonna get to the point where sheldon is overscruitinized
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: General_Failure on March 20, 2007, 11:21:47 AM
What we need is more Trotter scrutiny. Why is he still on the team?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 20, 2007, 11:24:20 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on March 20, 2007, 11:15:17 AM
i could too but im saying right now it would be retarded to move him to safety...yet im starting to hear and read rumblings about it and its actually gaining a foothold amongst eagle fans and its gonna get to the point where sheldon is overscruitinized

Agreed.  Sheldon's only drawback is that he lacks elite athleticism and speed.  He's got excellent instincts, plays physical, and very rarely lets a receiver get WIDE open.

Sidenote: He, along with Andy Reid and LaJuan Ramsey, celebrated a birthday yesterday!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: hbionic on March 20, 2007, 12:58:04 PM
That must have been an  interesting limo ride to the strip bar.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on March 20, 2007, 12:58:23 PM
Sheldon is a good CB. He got beat too much on the deep stuff last year for my liking, but whatever. He is very good inside when covering the slot guys because he is so physical. I like Will James on the outside with Sheldon on the inside in the nickel. I like that better than Hood being out there.

He should not be moved to FS or SS. Move him to safety and it may help reduce the over the middle crap to TEs but then we'll watch whatever dude is out on the edge get smoked routinely.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 20, 2007, 01:17:40 PM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on March 20, 2007, 12:58:23 PM
I like Will James on the outside with Sheldon on the inside in the nickel. I like that better than Hood being out there.

How can you possibly know enough about Will James' play to say that?  When was the last time he was actually healthy and played meaningful snaps against starting-caliber WR's?

Quote from: hbionic on March 20, 2007, 12:58:04 PM
That must have been an  interesting limo ride to the strip bar.

Especially if Garrett was driving.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on March 20, 2007, 01:25:54 PM
Obviously that is assuming he is healthy and plays like he did in NY.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 20, 2007, 01:39:10 PM
at no time in ny was will james better than sheldon on the outside...in a dome....in the rain....the snow....or the slot

stop feeding into the sheldon hate phreak youre a better homer than that

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on March 20, 2007, 01:41:36 PM
Sheldon sucks.  He's too short, can't tackle.  Bench him.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on March 20, 2007, 01:49:23 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on March 20, 2007, 01:39:10 PM
at no time in ny was will james better than sheldon on the outside...in a dome....in the rain....the snow....or the slot

stop feeding into the sheldon hate phreak youre a better homer than that



At no time did I say I hate Sheldon. I said he needs to stay at CB. I just like him playing the slot guy on 3rd downs, which he has done for years here. Bobby Taylor used to move inside on nickel too. I would rather him slide inside and have James outside on 3rd downs.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 20, 2007, 01:50:58 PM
Spadaro apparently compared Gocong to Adalius Thomas on Eagles Live.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on March 20, 2007, 01:54:27 PM
Thanks for the update. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 20, 2007, 01:56:46 PM
Quote from: Diomedes on March 20, 2007, 01:54:27 PM
Thanks for the update. 

You're so very welcome.

He also apparently said that Gaither's up to 245 lbs and that the SLB job is Dhani's to lose - but if he does lose his starting spot, he might have a hard time making the team.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on March 20, 2007, 02:01:41 PM
Quote from: FastFreddie on March 20, 2007, 01:56:46 PM
Quote from: Diomedes on March 20, 2007, 01:54:27 PM
Thanks for the update. 

You're so very welcome.

He also apparently said that Gaither's up to 245 lbs and that the SLB job is Dhani's to lose - but if he does lose his starting spot, he might have a hard time making the team.
If there is a football gods, make it happen
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 20, 2007, 02:04:41 PM
He also claimed Bunkley was barely coached in college, which is part of his problem.

I'm glad I'm not listening to this shtein first-hand.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on March 20, 2007, 02:07:07 PM
Well Bunkley did attend FSU so its not like he got an education either  :-D
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: phattymatty on March 20, 2007, 02:23:56 PM
Quote from: FastFreddie on March 20, 2007, 02:04:41 PM
He also claimed Bunkley was barely coached in college, which is part of his problem.

I'm glad I'm not listening to this shtein first-hand.

wouldn't just listening to it be easier than reading updates from someone who is listening to it?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 20, 2007, 02:26:06 PM
Quote from: phattymatty on March 20, 2007, 02:23:56 PM
Quote from: FastFreddie on March 20, 2007, 02:04:41 PM
He also claimed Bunkley was barely coached in college, which is part of his problem.

I'm glad I'm not listening to this shtein first-hand.

wouldn't just listening to it be easier than reading updates from someone who is listening to it?

not when I'm on a conference call, no...

Apparently, Dave said something about more flexibility this year because last year "Reno took up a roster spot".  He quickly corrected himself and tried to cover himself.  Ha.  Reno sucks.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Wingspan on March 20, 2007, 02:27:56 PM
Quote from: FastFreddie on March 20, 2007, 02:04:41 PM
He also claimed Bunkley was barely coached in college, which is part of his problem.

I'm glad I'm not listening to this shtein first-hand.

You are.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Don Ho on March 20, 2007, 03:48:56 PM
Quote from: Seabiscuit36 on March 20, 2007, 02:01:41 PM
Quote from: FastFreddie on March 20, 2007, 01:56:46 PM
Quote from: Diomedes on March 20, 2007, 01:54:27 PM
Thanks for the update. 

You're so very welcome.

He also apparently said that Gaither's up to 245 lbs and that the SLB job is Dhani's to lose - but if he does lose his starting spot, he might have a hard time making the team.
If there is a football gods, make it happen

and we continue to pray to the gods.

(http://www.moviemarket.co.uk/library/photos/178/178114.jpg)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on March 20, 2007, 03:49:12 PM
Quote from: FastFreddie on March 20, 2007, 02:04:41 PM
He also claimed Bunkley was barely coached in college, which is part of his problem.

Interesting how the Eagles have selected not one but two(!) defensive tackles in the first round from a school that apparently doesn't teach its linemen to play the position.



Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 20, 2007, 03:51:42 PM
Quote from: Wingspan on March 20, 2007, 02:27:56 PM
You are.

No.

Quote from: Jerome99RIP on March 20, 2007, 03:49:12 PM
Quote from: FastFreddie on March 20, 2007, 02:04:41 PM
He also claimed Bunkley was barely coached in college, which is part of his problem.

Interesting how the Eagles have selected not one but two(!) defensive tackles in the first round from a school that apparently doesn't teach its linemen to play the position.

Corey Simon doesn't count, or something.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 20, 2007, 03:53:51 PM
gimme a break...like lineman have to be taught how to play...you can learn the techniqes in about one and a half practices...

eagles are so full of shtein...they are just saying this because they want to act as tho all along they knew bunkley was gonna be a project that might take a few years to develop....it always someones elses fault
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on March 20, 2007, 03:54:20 PM
You took the words right out of my keyboard, IGY.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 20, 2007, 03:58:35 PM
Quote from: Jerome99RIP on March 20, 2007, 03:54:20 PM
You took the words right out of my anus, IGY.

edited to reflect the truth
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 20, 2007, 04:02:33 PM
with a crazy straw
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on March 20, 2007, 04:14:25 PM
Quote from: FastFreddie on March 20, 2007, 03:58:35 PM
Quote from: Jerome99RIP on March 20, 2007, 03:54:20 PM
You took the words right out of my anus, IGY.

edited to reflect my awkward man-love for Mrs. Rome's little boy.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 20, 2007, 04:22:13 PM
Quote from: Jerome99RIP on March 20, 2007, 04:14:25 PM
Quote from: FastFreddie on March 20, 2007, 03:58:35 PM
Quote from: Jerome99RIP on March 20, 2007, 03:54:20 PM
You took the words right out of my anus, IGY.

edited to reflect my awkward man-love for Mrs. Rome's little boy.

I think you mean "ROME'S MOM".
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on March 20, 2007, 04:25:00 PM
W...
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyandBCEagles on March 20, 2007, 07:32:48 PM
Assuming Koy and Dirk are both gone, who holds for us next season??
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Geowhizzer on March 20, 2007, 07:36:40 PM
Quote from: PhillyandBCEagles on March 20, 2007, 07:32:48 PM
Assuming Koy and Dirk are both gone, who holds for us next season??

(http://philadelphia-eagles.net/players/portrait/mahe_reno.jpg)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on March 20, 2007, 07:37:37 PM
The man himself: Saverio Rocca!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 21, 2007, 04:03:18 PM
the hidden answer to our LB problems (http://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/team/teamRosterDetails.jsp?id=64089)

(http://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/uploads/photos/perm/main/EACLCBHOKLFH/Kobel_playerheadshot070124.jpg)

6'2", 265!  Trotter beware!
Title: All hail MJG
Post by: -Triumph- on March 21, 2007, 04:21:44 PM
(http://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/uploads/photos/perm/main/IIPKMNACBEMK/ocw_2.jpg)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 21, 2007, 05:34:49 PM
Reid coming back full-time (http://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/homeNewsDetail.jsp?id=66438)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: DH on March 22, 2007, 08:43:50 AM
Sammy Knight was cut last night. He's my new #1 choice for SS.

Then Hamlin, then Doss. But seriously, I'm in support of ABC...Anybody But Considine.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: dis12 on March 22, 2007, 09:11:34 AM
Quote from: Die-Hard on March 22, 2007, 08:43:50 AM
Sammy Knight was cut last night. He's my new #1 choice for SS.

Then Hamlin, then Doss. But seriously, I'm in support of ABC...Anybody But Considine.

probably too old for Eagles to consider...unless he would sign on the cheap.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: DH on March 22, 2007, 09:15:36 AM
Blaine Bishop, Kirkland, Sinclair and a parade of other guys were all older at the time of their signings.

farg age. I want a SS that can play, and Knight still can.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 22, 2007, 09:24:42 AM
I want a SS that can play

yes

and maybe even mroe than that they need someone competant on the roster for when/if considine implodes ala mccoy....i like mikell but dook is a special teamer...i dont wanna be in week 4 next year after considine has shtein the bed for the first quarter of the season and have my options be quinten mikell
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 22, 2007, 09:40:37 AM
Sammy Knight is a great player still.  I'd take him for a 1 or 2 year deal on the cheap.

Still, he's similar to Michael Lewis and older, so I doubt it'll happen.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Zanshin on March 22, 2007, 09:50:26 AM
Sammy Knight has a nose for the ball, but he's a pretty slow dude.  Meh.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MURP on March 22, 2007, 10:08:48 AM
Quote from: FastFreddie on March 22, 2007, 09:40:37 AM
Sammy Knight is a great player

you have pretty low standards as to what you consider "great."
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Zanshin on March 22, 2007, 10:16:30 AM
I just don't see old and slow as a viable option for fixing the SS spot.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on March 22, 2007, 10:23:44 AM
They've been running with dumb and slow, why not old and slow?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 22, 2007, 10:23:45 AM
Quote from: MURP on March 22, 2007, 10:08:48 AM
Quote from: FastFreddie on March 22, 2007, 09:40:37 AM
Sammy Knight is a great player

you have pretty low standards as to what you consider "great."

The current standard is Sean Considine.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on March 22, 2007, 06:39:50 PM
fwiw, ESPN is having a breakdown of the Eagles on Sportscenter
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on March 22, 2007, 06:47:18 PM
Kiper knows best.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on March 22, 2007, 07:45:15 PM
Someone posted it before but Kiper says we are going to pick Steve Smith from USC  :-D  Kiper is beyond a joke at this point.  I'd like Smith but for a second. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 22, 2007, 07:50:31 PM
the kiper hate is not only out of control but completely unwarranted
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 22, 2007, 08:07:50 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on March 22, 2007, 07:50:31 PM
the kiper hate is not only out of control but completely unwarranted

Look, we know you like Kiper.  That's fine.  But picking an Avant clone in the 1st round would be worse than picking a white linebacker.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 22, 2007, 08:16:07 PM
QuoteEagles | Team no longer interested in Wilson
Thu, 22 Mar 2007 16:36:04 -0700

Adam Schefter, of the NFL Network, reports the Philadelphia Eagles were involved in trade talks with the Denver Broncos to acquire LB Al Wilson, but have now backed out of the negotiations.

The Broncos probably committed a sin by asking about Scott Young's availability.

LINK (http://www.nfl.com/nflnetwork/story/10080863)

Now it looks like Wilson will end up with the Giants.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 22, 2007, 08:17:24 PM
al wilson is a friggin manimal

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on March 22, 2007, 09:29:37 PM
Quote from: FastFreddie on March 22, 2007, 08:16:07 PM
QuoteEagles | Team no longer interested in Wilson
Thu, 22 Mar 2007 16:36:04 -0700

Adam Schefter, of the NFL Network, reports the Philadelphia Eagles were involved in trade talks with the Denver Broncos to acquire LB Al Wilson, but have now backed out of the negotiations.

The Broncos probably committed a sin by asking about Scott Young's availability.

Either that or Wilson expressed his desire to make more than the vet minimum for the rest of his career.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Magical_Retard on March 22, 2007, 10:38:53 PM
mmmm wilson.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MDS on March 22, 2007, 11:07:39 PM
the eagles dont value the linebacker position and are content with starting ass juice and vaginal warts there. end of story. give it up.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Magical_Retard on March 22, 2007, 11:25:08 PM
Quote from: MDS on March 22, 2007, 11:07:39 PM
the eagles dont value the linebacker position and are content with starting ass juice and vaginal warts there. end of story. give it up.


:-D :-D :-D
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: QB Eagles on March 23, 2007, 12:45:11 AM
I guess the Broncos wouldn't take Reno Mahe and a fifth-rounder.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on March 23, 2007, 12:51:09 AM
Why are they trading their best LB and a top 5 MLB in the NFL? Unless they are really stupid, the Giants must be offering Kiwanuka or a really high pick. Otherwise the Broncos would be insane to deal Wilson. He is a stud.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: QB Eagles on March 23, 2007, 12:55:04 AM
Quote from: King Cole on March 23, 2007, 12:51:09 AM
Why are they trading their best LB and a top 5 MLB in the NFL? Unless they are really stupid, the Giants must be offering Kiwanuka or a really high pick. Otherwise the Broncos would be insane to deal Wilson. He is a stud.

Wilson is unhappy with his already-lucrative contract and just switched agents, indicating a possible holdout situation brewing.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on March 23, 2007, 12:58:25 AM
If he ends up with the Giants for chopped liver then it will be a disgrace. Offer a 3rd, Moats, and Walker. Will they bite on that? No clue. They did supposedly want Moats last year. The Giants probably have more to offer and probably are offering Kiwanuka or 2nd rounder and a player for him.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: QB Eagles on March 23, 2007, 01:01:41 AM
Right now it sounds like the Giants will end up with him. Wilson stands to make around $6 million this year, Denver just can't swing that after their free agency shopping spree.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 23, 2007, 06:10:53 AM
Smart move:  Pay Travis Henry and Patrick Ramsey, cut Al Wilson.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 23, 2007, 06:31:17 AM
i love wilson but hes been a maniac his whole career and is 30...meaning lots of miles on that engine...plus hes a guy that relies on his speed and for a speed linebacker age kills....not saying i wouldnt love to get him...but if hes looking for some kind of monster extension then i probably shy away...seems to me hes the kind of guy you get for the next two years...i just dont think hes good enough to elevate the eagles to a superbowl in that short time span
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on March 23, 2007, 06:57:09 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on March 23, 2007, 06:31:17 AM
i love wilson but hes been a maniac his whole career and is 30...meaning lots of miles on that engine...plus hes a guy that relies on his speed and for a speed linebacker age kills....not saying i wouldnt love to get him...but if hes looking for some kind of monster extension then i probably shy away...seems to me hes the kind of guy you get for the next two years...i just dont think hes good enough to elevate the eagles to a superbowl in that short time span
/\ /\ /\
I second this.  Now if it was Williams i'd break the bank. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 23, 2007, 08:05:53 AM
darrent williams?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on March 23, 2007, 08:13:40 AM
DJ
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 23, 2007, 08:54:11 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on March 23, 2007, 08:05:53 AM
darrent williams?

Ha!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 23, 2007, 10:10:29 AM
espn 'on the clock' eagles

the page also has a video link where you can watch the sportscenter segment

darren woodson is the absolute worst

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2806592
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on March 23, 2007, 11:38:10 AM
Reid PC:

-- good to be back, thanked everyone for their support, and since it's a pending legal matter, he can't comment on his sons
-- when asked about leaving permanently, said it crossed his mind....family is the most important thing...but he needed some time away to clear things and never got to a point where he was going to quit
-- thanked Merrill for asking a football question (FA/draft), then got mad when Vai went back to asking about the sons
-- is keeping up with personnel moves and watching film....said Heckert is doing a good job
-- "how's Garrett's rehab?"  ::)
-- asked if he can still be effective as a coach with less time dedicated....says he hasn't thought about that and is excited to be back
-- Reagor visited several doctors that checked out his vision and they all said he'll be fine
-- Great job, great city to coach in, it's a "special thing" to coach in Philly, fellates the Philly fans again
-- "do you feel a lot of guilt" when it comes to your kids  :boom
-- asked if this situation taught him anything....said nah, just how much he missed the reporters.  Someone yelled "SH*T" right before it cut away.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on March 23, 2007, 11:41:18 AM
why bother?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on March 23, 2007, 11:48:54 AM
If you ignore the spew, here's an article with quotes and comments (http://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/news/newsDetail.jsp?id=66475) from Bunkley admitting that he sucked last year...
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 23, 2007, 12:08:59 PM
Quote from: BigEd76 on March 23, 2007, 11:38:10 AM
-- asked if he can still be effective as a coach with less time dedicated....says he hasn't thought about that and is excited to be back

I call BS.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 23, 2007, 12:31:44 PM
he said like five times family comes first in the reid household...no it doesnt...if it came first you wouldnt have the job you do...

i bet anything had his sons incidents not happened at absolutely the perfect time for reid he woudlnt have taken the sabbatical...that shtein happens during the season he doesnt miss a single practice

this is a good thing if youre an eagle fan because as long as he remains head coach i want him 100% focused on the team since i dont give a flying farg about his family

the last thing any of us need to worry about is reid dedicating less time to the team
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on March 23, 2007, 02:59:13 PM
Wilson's a Giant.

All they gave up was DE Justin Tuck (4th round backup from ND) and a swap of picks #21 for #20.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MURP on March 23, 2007, 03:00:19 PM
what a steal for the Giants.   

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 23, 2007, 03:03:36 PM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on March 23, 2007, 02:59:13 PM
Wilson's a Giant.

All they gave up was DE Justin Tuck (4th round backup from ND) and a swap of picks #21 for #20.

Quote from: MURP on March 23, 2007, 03:00:19 PM
what a steal for the Giants.   

It depends if they had to give him a new deal with a lot of guaranteed money or not, but yeah.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on March 23, 2007, 03:06:10 PM
Whats the Gmen LB corp look like now?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 23, 2007, 03:09:29 PM
better than the eagles?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on March 23, 2007, 03:10:10 PM
Who isnt better than the eagles LB's
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on March 23, 2007, 03:12:59 PM
Rutgers?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on March 23, 2007, 03:13:52 PM
Quote from: Seabiscuit36 on March 23, 2007, 03:06:10 PM
Whats the Gmen LB corp look like now?
I'm guessing Wilson moves over to the SAM, Pierce stays at MIKE, and Blackburn or a draft pick plays the WIL. Their D still sucks, their secondary is awful.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on March 23, 2007, 03:14:08 PM
Quote57 Blackburn, Chase LB 6-3 247 23 2 Akron
58 Pierce, Antonio LB 6-1 238 28 6 Arizona
54 Short, Brandon LB 6-3 245 29 7 Penn State
48 Smith, Tyson LB 6-2 240 25 1 Iowa State
53 Torbor, Reggie LB 6-2 250 26 3 Auburn
59 Wilkinson, Gerris LB
AL WILSON
Quote0 Cain, Jeremy  LB 6-1 235 3 Massachusetts Tamarac, FL
50 Daniels, Torrance  LB 6-3 248 2 Harding Clarendon, AR
96 Gaither, Omar  LB 6-1 235 2 Tennessee Charlotte, NC
54 Trotter, Jeremiah  LB 6-1 262 10 Stephen F. Austin Hooks, TX
53 Roper, Dedrick  LB 6-2 245 3 Northwood Milpitas, CA
52 Richmond, Greg  LB 6-1 235 2 Oklahoma St. Oklahoma City, OK
51 McCoy, Matt  LB 5-11 230 3 San Diego State Tustin, CA
0 Kobel, Craig - e  LB 6-2 265 1 South Florida Lake Worth, FL
55 Jones, Dhani  LB 6-1 240 8 Michigan Potomac, MD
57 Gocong, Chris  LB/DE   :-D
Pathetic
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on March 23, 2007, 03:27:28 PM
Apparently Wilson failed his physical so the deal is off.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 23, 2007, 03:29:37 PM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on March 23, 2007, 03:27:28 PM
Apparently Wilson failed his physical so the deal is off.

That was quick.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 23, 2007, 03:33:11 PM
no wonder denver was giving him away for a rented mule
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 23, 2007, 03:34:24 PM
Maybe the Eagles can now get him on the cheap for Rayburn or some shtein.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MURP on March 23, 2007, 03:37:44 PM
Montae Reagor apparently failed his physical with the Colts too.  hmmmmmmmmm
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 23, 2007, 03:40:41 PM
having one eye will do that
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on March 23, 2007, 03:51:24 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on March 23, 2007, 03:40:41 PM
having one eye will do that
My penis says hi
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MDS on March 23, 2007, 04:16:32 PM
its not a big deal. reagor cant just see less of his ass getting run over and less of considine wiffing on tackles.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: DH on March 23, 2007, 04:32:48 PM
Quote from: Diomedes on March 23, 2007, 03:12:59 PM
Rutgers?

Actually, no. Brandon Renkardt is a beast who would take bow ties job in less than a week.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MURP on March 23, 2007, 04:54:28 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on March 23, 2007, 03:40:41 PM
having one eye will do that


Jermane Mayberry says hi. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on March 23, 2007, 05:02:34 PM
tell him i said hi back
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: phillymic2000 on March 23, 2007, 05:11:53 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on March 23, 2007, 10:10:29 AM
espn 'on the clock' eagles

the page also has a video link where you can watch the sportscenter segment

darren woodson is the absolute worst

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2806592

:-DWe've always prided ourselves on "Strong Aggressive" Linebacker play :-D

I needed a good laugh today
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Stallworth Supporter on March 24, 2007, 12:50:47 AM
Any interest in Domanick Davis (Williamson)?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: bobbyinlondon on March 24, 2007, 03:05:02 AM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on March 23, 2007, 02:59:13 PM
Wilson's a Giant.

All they gave up was DE Justin Tuck (4th round backup from ND) and a swap of picks #21 for #20.


From Ralph Vacchiano's blog in the NY Daily News:


It's doubtful that the trade talks broke off over terms, since the Giants likely wouldn't have flown Wilson in for a physical if they hadn't at least agreed on the framework of a deal.

Oh, and for what it's worth, those terms apparently did not include the Giants sending defensive end Justin Tuck to the Broncos. Tuck's agent, Doug Hendrickson, told the Daily News in an e-mail today that such speculation was "Not true." Now, it's certainly possible that he just didn't know. But it's also doubtful the Broncos would have accepted Tuck in trade without bringing him to Denver for a physical so they could examine his injured foot. And Hendrickson would've known if Tuck was taking a physical for the Broncos.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on March 24, 2007, 07:47:45 AM
The rumor floating is that the Eagles are looking at Takeo Spikes.   :yay 
Edit:  farging Gargano was just speculating :boo

Also the packers are looking at Michael "The Burner" Turner in a trade with Sandiego. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 24, 2007, 10:59:24 AM
Quote from: Seabiscuit36 on March 24, 2007, 07:47:45 AM
The rumor floating is that the Eagles are looking at Takeo Spikes.   :yay 
Edit:  farging Gargano was just speculating :boo

Nice work.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: QB Eagles on March 24, 2007, 12:13:02 PM
Takeo Spikes would be awesome, especially if the Bills traded the Eagles the rights to build a time machine and get the 2003 Takeo Spikes instead of the old, fading, post-Achilles 2007 Takeo Spikes.

Of course, a well over-the-hill Spikes would still be the best LB on the Eagles.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Don Ho on March 24, 2007, 04:23:39 PM
Quote from: QB Eagles on March 24, 2007, 12:13:02 PM
Takeo Spikes would be awesome, especially if the Bills traded the Eagles the rights to build a time machine and get the 2003 Takeo Spikes instead of the old, fading, post-Achilles 2007 Takeo Spikes.

Of course, a well over-the-hill Spikes would still be the best LB on the Eagles.

as funny and sad as that sounds, you are 100% correct.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhanInDC on March 25, 2007, 11:39:18 AM
Quote
Bills near a trade of Spikes
Linebacker expectedto bring draft pick
By Mark Gaughan NEWS SPORTS REPORTER
Updated: 03/25/07 8:24 AM


The Buffalo Bills are getting closer to trading linebacker Takeo Spikes, The Buffalo News has learned.

Trade negotiations gained steam Friday and Saturday, and a deal might be consummated within the next day, a league source told The News.

Numerous teams reportedly were interested in acquiring the 30-year-old former Pro Bowler, but which one ultimately would win his services still was not known Saturday night. Spikes is entering what likely would be the final year of his contract with the Bills, and a trade may involve Spikes agreeing to a new contract with his new team. The Bills have an option to pick up the last year of Spikes' contract, in 2008.

Spikes has been scouting potential trade partners, with the approval of the Bills, who have had him on the trade block. Any willing partner Spikes found, of course, has to meet the Bills' trade demand, which is expected to be draft-pick compensation.

Finances are playing a big part in the Spikes move, and they are the reason his trade has been expected for weeks.

The Bills have made big free-agent purchases the past month and have committed about $105 million to this year's player costs, by News estimates. They do not intend to spend more than the NFL salary cap total of $112 million in real dollars this year. (Teams are allowed to spend cash over the cap because signing bonuses can be spread

out over the length of the contract for accounting purposes.)

The Bills still need to spend a lot of money to sign their draft choices. That total could exceed $10 million, depending on how they structure the contracts. They also must keep some money in reserve to replace injured players during the season.

So it's hard to see how they could avoid spending over the cap in real money with Spikes, who is scheduled to make $4.6 million, on the roster.

The trade of Spikes will be a big vote of confidence for Keith Ellison, the sixth-round draft pick from 2006 who started seven games last year and got good reviews. He's virtually assured of one of the starting outside linebacker jobs this season. Angelo Crowell will man another starting spot, either in the middle or on the outside. The Bills will have to add someone, either via the draft or free agency or both, to join the starting linebacker corps.

Could it be the Birds? Doubtful....
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on March 25, 2007, 11:40:03 AM
Giants
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 25, 2007, 11:43:13 AM
i dont get the spikes rumors...to me he IS trotter...this would be the ultimate sideways move
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: NGM on March 25, 2007, 11:49:59 AM
Man, I love Trot but I have to believe Spikes is a lot better than him.  Even with the knee injury. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 25, 2007, 11:52:23 AM
spikes might better but its certainly not by a lot...if he was a free agent and you preferred him to trotter then maybe you go after him...but i wouldnt give up anything for him
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: NGM on March 25, 2007, 11:53:24 AM
True.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on March 25, 2007, 12:24:08 PM
I'm hearing Corey Simon for Spikes
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: mussa on March 25, 2007, 01:20:36 PM
i'd trade for spikes no doubt. he's a starter, not some 3rd round white undersized linebacker.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: hbionic on March 25, 2007, 01:23:43 PM
His neck alone is bigger than most linebackers out there.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Stallworth Supporter on March 25, 2007, 01:58:19 PM
Eagles | Team showing interest in Spikes
Sun, 25 Mar 2007 10:17:42 -0700

John Murphy, of Yahoo! Sports, reports the Philadelphia Eagles are showing interest in possibly obtaining Buffalo Bills LB Takeo Spikes, according to a league source. Spikes would need to pass a physical and negotiate a new deal. The source believes the Bills could receive a mid-to-late round choice in the 2007 NFL Draft if both conditions are met. The Eagles would likely move Spikes to the outside if they acquire him. The team could also move him inside and make LB Jeremiah Trotter more of a two-down linebacker.

Link (http://www.kffl.com/hotw/nfl)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: NGM on March 25, 2007, 02:01:44 PM
5th round or later I'm cool with if this is true.  They would spend it on some white guy from BYU anyway. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on March 25, 2007, 02:03:10 PM
Quote from: NGM on March 25, 2007, 02:01:44 PM
5th round or later I'm cool with if this is true.  

Me too... and considering that the Eagles don't have a 4th to give at this point...
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on March 25, 2007, 02:21:17 PM
I saw that on KFFL but I can't find anything on Yahoo Sports about it....
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: QB Eagles on March 25, 2007, 02:29:09 PM
Quote from: NGM on March 25, 2007, 02:01:44 PM
5th round or later I'm cool with if this is true.  They would spend it on some white guy from BYU anyway. 

He hasn't played all that well since he tore his Achilles and his contract is huge, but the Eagles have to do something at LB, so I'd be for the trade for a 5th or lower too. Just keep in mind the chances of him either playing at his former All Pro level or agreeing to restructure his contract are small.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on March 25, 2007, 02:35:33 PM
He'd be almost 2 years removed from that Achilles injury and to tell you the truth... I don't need him to be all-pro anymore.  Personally, all I would need from Spikes is to solidify the LB corps somewhat and if the Eagles were to play him at SAM... then to give the Eagles a year or two to understand what they want to do with Gocong.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhanInDC on March 25, 2007, 03:38:02 PM
Spikes actually finished up the year pretty strong. Early on he showed the effects of the achilles, but as the season went on, he began to look more and more like himself. The Bills are doing this to get rid of his contract, not because they believe he can't play. If the Eagles do this, I gotta believe it's because Trot may be very close to done, but being that Spikes if 30, it's not like he'd be a long term solution to the position. It would allow them to draft more of a project to develop to take over later. They don't have a fourth, so it would have to be something from five down, or possibly a pick next year. Either of them I'd be happy with. If Spikes came in and was 80% of what he was a couple of years ago, he'd be a big upgrade.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Magical_Retard on March 25, 2007, 03:52:26 PM
i would rather the eagles go after wilson.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 25, 2007, 03:58:52 PM
wtf?

spikes cant play the outside...i thought this was a replacement for trotter
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on March 25, 2007, 05:08:35 PM
I don't know if he can play outside anymore, but did in Cinci.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on March 25, 2007, 05:32:34 PM
How many linebackers have the Eagles traded for since Reid has been here?  Simoneau is the only one I can think of.  As much as I'd like to see Spikes brought in, I don't think the Eagles will make a move, especially if it requires giving up a pick.  The only time the words "draft pick" and "linebacker" are ever associated with the Eagles is when they spend a late round pick on some project guy. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 25, 2007, 05:35:36 PM
and if youre gonna give up a pick for lb give up a one for someone like vilma (not saying hes even available)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on March 25, 2007, 06:41:19 PM
Even a one-legged Spikes is better than the banjo-picking funhole he'd replace.

In.

Also - it occurs to me that the Eagles could move Spikes inside and use Trotter as a rotational guy if his gimpy knees can't hold up anymore.

Oh, and the Eagles would have to give up a #1 (or more) to get Vilma.  They'd be able to get Spikes for a hell of a lot less than that.  Maybe a five or a six?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 25, 2007, 06:46:36 PM
Even a one-legged Spikes is better than the banjo-picking funhole he'd replace.

In.


i cant believe im even saying this but id rather have dhani than spikes...dhani as weak as he is he doesnt get torched by the te like spikes would...id rather have a non tackling non playmaking vanilla wafer sam than a guy who is repeatedly getting burnt for big plays by the te (and guys out of the backfield)...especially if it means giving up a pick for spikes

Also - it occurs to me that the Eagles could move Spikes inside and use Trotter as a rotational guy if his gimpy knees can't hold up anymore.

this is the only scenario that works as far as getting takeo

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on March 25, 2007, 06:51:19 PM
How do you know Spikes would get torched by anyone?

If the Eagles are interested in him, we would have to assume that he's completely healthy and ready to go.  If so, he's ten times the player Jones is, IGY.

If he isn't healthy, then he wouldn't pass the physical, and the deal would be off.

Bottom line: A healthy Spikes >>>>>>>>>>>> Jones.  A gimpy Spikes = not an Eagle.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 25, 2007, 06:59:13 PM
spikes is not an olb anymore...period...if you think hed be better than dhani then ill say maybe...i think hed be stronger and better against the run (obviously) but takeo cannot run with te's at all....id rather have a guy that plays the position and stinks than a guy who shouldnt be playing the position at all...again especially if youre gonna give up something for him...dont get me wrong this is a 6 of one half dozen of the other argument...i dont really care who plays there as they both will stink...but i dont wanna give up anything for a guy who isnt going to be a real improvement...id rather the change be for free and come from within (move gaither over) or from outside with no cost (a draft pick or UFA)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on March 25, 2007, 07:09:57 PM
What is your basis for saying that Spikes can't keep up with tight ends anymore?   I haven't read that anywhere. 

In the last game of the season last year against Baltimore, Spikes led the team in tackles.  If someone is leading the team in tackles, that says to me he can still play, especially at the linebacker position.

Whatever, though.  It's useless to discuss this because the Eagles won't get him anyway.

Still... here's an article from the Bills website from January 16th on Spikes...

QuoteSpikes Wonders About Future of Bills Defense
by Chris Brown, Lead Journalist   Last Updated: 1/16/2007 1:11 PM ET

Email Alerts    Forward To A Friend    Print Page    Wireless Alerts    Wireless Feeds

More Coverage
More Coverage
linkTop Rated Bills Photos
linkEllison Provided Big Boost
videoTakeo Spikes Press Conference

It may not be something Takeo Spikes wanted to think about, but when the 2006 season came to a close on New Year's Eve it quickly came to mind. How much will things be different on the defensive side of the ball for the Bills in 2007?

For Spikes there was the realization that it could be dramatically different in terms of personnel. Sure there are changes every year in this era of free agency, and Buffalo's linebacker has seen good veteran players depart before.

What could make this offseason different is a total of three defensive starters are free agents and all could be playing elsewhere next season. Spikes has already contemplated the possibility of Nate Clements, London Fletcher and Chris Kelsay all wearing different uniforms in 2007.

"Yeah, you definitely think about it," said Spikes. "It took less than a week for me to even think about it. I thought about that earlier in the year and that's being realistic. That's how this game goes. It's the nature of the business."

"We'll certainly be interested in our guys," said head coach Dick Jauron of the team's impending free agents. "Our guys may want to test the market and we understand that, but we'd like to be kept in the loop and keep the conversations up with them and be as honest as we can be with them and keep an open mind as we chase our guys and others. That's the game, that's the business. Only time will tell."

Spikes, who benefited from free agency himself when he signed a lucrative six-year deal with the Bills, understands that some close teammates have to do what's best for them in free agency. At the same time he recognizes if the starting roles of Clements, Fletcher and Kelsay all have to be filled on the defensive side of the ball for Buffalo things will look dramatically different.

"Hopefully we'll get guys to come up and fill those voids," said Spikes. "Players like Nate, London and Kelsay are all different in their own way. They each bring something special to the table. Putting somebody in their spot, if they're not here next year, is not easy to do. I guess that next man won't have to worry about filling someone else's shoes, because he has his own special talents to bring to the table."

Not having Fletcher as a teammate next season would be especially difficult because of the bond the two linebackers have developed over the past four seasons. The two men found it hard to keep it together before taking the field in Baltimore for the season finale.

"He was emotional before the game," said Spikes of Fletcher. "I couldn't even look at him. I might have lost it."

That's why prior to the last game of 2006 Spikes had some words for his defensive teammates.

"One of the things I told the guys is to play every play like it's your last, mainly because it's the last time we'll ever be together as a team," Spikes said. "And you never know who is watching for the first time so you want to leave a good impression."

And Spikes did finish strong as he was the team's leading tackler in the final game at Baltimore. It was the second time the strong side linebacker was the top tackle producer this past season. But did the former Pro Bowl player show enough to convince the organization that he can again be the impact player he was two years ago?

"I'll stick with what I've said throughout the year," said Jauron. "He played through a lot of minor things, he played through a lot of major things, he played his way back in, he never complained, he was a leader on our football team and I believe that he got progressively better even though he had some setbacks in there, some injury setbacks that accumulated through the year. I have a lot of respect for him, for how he handled the whole situation."

But Spikes is entering the final two years of his contract when his base salary will be at its highest. The Bills will likely think about the return on their investment.

Regardless of what anyone else thinks, Spikes is convinced he will again be he player he once was.

"When next year comes it'll be that much better," said Spikes of his Achilles. "I look forward to next year, I really do."

"I've never talked to our doctors or any trainers about it," said Jauron as to whether Spikes will be a better player another full year removed from the 2005 injury. "But I don't see any reason to suspect that he wouldn't be."

Despite who may depart via free agency, Spikes remains optimistic that there is a foundation in place from which the team can grow and improve in 2007.

"There are a lot of pluses going into next year," said Spikes. "We don't have to start over with a new scheme and people doing things and learning. And the bulk of the roster is coming back."
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 25, 2007, 07:24:11 PM
What is your basis for saying that Spikes can't keep up with tight ends anymore?   I haven't read that anywhere. 

from watching him play the last several years


In the last game of the season last year against Baltimore, Spikes led the team in tackles.  If someone is leading the team in tackles, that says to me he can still play, especially at the linebacker position

matt mccoy says (http://www.accboards.com/UBB/wave.gif)


like i said spikes may be better than dhani but dont be so sure of that...i think people are using their hatred of dhani and their thoughts of 2002 takeo and turning that into giving up a draft pick for spikes a good move

again this is not a huge deal...im simply saying that if it takes a draft pick to get takeo spikes i wouldnt do it...if they do do it tho i will have no complaints
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: dis12 on March 25, 2007, 07:52:48 PM
interesting that on KFFL, it was posted in this order.
QuoteEagles | Team showing interest in Spikes
Sun, 25 Mar 2007 10:17:42 -0700

John Murphy, of Yahoo! Sports, reports the Philadelphia Eagles are showing interest in possibly obtaining Buffalo Bills LB Takeo Spikes, according to a league source. Spikes would need to pass a physical and negotiate a new deal. The source believes the Bills could receive a mid-to-late round choice in the 2007 NFL Draft if both conditions are met. The Eagles would likely move Spikes to the outside if they acquire him. The team could also move him inside and make LB Jeremiah Trotter more of a two-down linebacker.


Giants | Team showing interest in Spikes
Sun, 25 Mar 2007 10:17:14 -0700

John Murphy, of Yahoo! Sports, reports the New York Giants are showing interest in possibly obtaining Buffalo Bills LB Takeo Spikes, according to a league source. Spikes would need to pass a physical and negotiate a new deal. The source believes the Bills could receive a mid-to-late round choice in the 2007 NFL Draft if both conditions are met.

I'm not sure which I'd rather see...although IGY and Rome have said plenty.   Obviously, if $ start to creep, Birds will bail.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyGirl on March 25, 2007, 08:40:30 PM
Quote from: Magical_Retard on March 25, 2007, 03:52:26 PM
i would rather the eagles go after wilson.

He of the failed Giants physical?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on March 25, 2007, 09:08:46 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on March 25, 2007, 07:24:11 PM
What is your basis for saying that Spikes can't keep up with tight ends anymore?   I haven't read that anywhere. 

from watching him play the last several years

Well, since you don't watch anything besides the Eagles, and they haven't played the Bills since the game after Limbaugh's comments 4 years ago, that's a good analysis.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on March 25, 2007, 09:48:02 PM
Get Spikes. NOW!

Igy, for you to say you would rather have Dhani than him is crazy talk. I kid you not when I say I would rather have Seth Joyner now at SLB than Dhani.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Magical_Retard on March 25, 2007, 10:05:50 PM
Quote from: PhillyGirl on March 25, 2007, 08:40:30 PM
Quote from: Magical_Retard on March 25, 2007, 03:52:26 PM
i would rather the eagles go after wilson.

He of the failed Giants physical?

yeah who cares get him in for our own physical and since his value has decreased im sure the eagles wouldnt mind offering a 7th rd pick for him.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on March 25, 2007, 10:53:21 PM
Quote from: BigEd76 on March 25, 2007, 09:08:46 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on March 25, 2007, 07:24:11 PM
What is your basis for saying that Spikes can't keep up with tight ends anymore?   I haven't read that anywhere. 

from watching him play the last several years

Well, since you don't watch anything besides the Eagles, and they haven't played the Bills since the game after Limbaugh's comments 4 years ago, that's a good analysis.

Ed beat me to it.  Although I wouldn't have remembered that the Limbaugh comments came after that game. 

Side note:  That Eagles/Bills game was a lot of fun to watch because not only did the Eagles finally show up after a disappointing 0-2 start but Westbrook gave us a glimpse of the future with a beautiful game clinching 60+ yard td run. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on March 25, 2007, 11:14:26 PM
Buffalo was 7th in the league vs. the pass last season, so Spikes can't be that bad. Plus, our problem isn't with stopping the pass, its with the run, if you add a LB who doesn't get trucked every sweep he's worth it. Spikes for a late round pick with a re-negotiated deal is a steal.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on March 25, 2007, 11:54:31 PM
That 2003 season was the one where it started with home losses to Tampa Bay and New England in the Linc debut, then Limbaugh attacked during the bye week, then they won 11 of their next 12...
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MDS on March 26, 2007, 12:18:06 AM
Rush might have been hopped up on some pills then, give him a break.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on March 26, 2007, 12:19:11 AM
Apparently they said on Sportscenter that the Eagles are now the frontrunners to get Spikes and a trade is "imminent"...
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: General_Failure on March 26, 2007, 12:19:32 AM
Woo. ..?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MDS on March 26, 2007, 12:20:19 AM
3 years ago I cream my pants, now I just get a better than Dhani Jones boner
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Munson on March 26, 2007, 12:38:14 AM
Both Spadaro and Heckert have been hinting at a trade for a LB so...this wouldn't suprise me. Looks like they'll bring in Spikes, cut Dhani, give Gocong more time to develop into whatever the hell he's going to be, and let Gaither stay at WIL.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on March 26, 2007, 12:46:24 AM
Spikes is at the NC complex right now and he is the reason Andy came back from a hiatus!!

Spikes in Eagle green!

Taykeo Spikez1!111!11!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: jroceagles on March 26, 2007, 06:08:18 AM
Quote from: General_Failure on March 26, 2007, 12:19:32 AM
Woo. ..?

When was this said??!!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 26, 2007, 06:29:08 AM
Quote from: BigEd76 on March 26, 2007, 12:19:11 AM
Apparently they said on Sportscenter that the Eagles are now the frontrunners to get Spikes and a trade is "imminent"...

I'd rather have Vilma.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: hbionic on March 26, 2007, 06:34:33 AM
(http://tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:V90oly__VCoHnM:http://overtaken.blogmosis.com/images/wilma.jpg)

Ich bin einen Vilma.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: jroceagles on March 26, 2007, 06:40:36 AM
Quote from: BigEd76 on March 26, 2007, 12:19:11 AM
Apparently they said on Sportscenter that the Eagles are now the frontrunners to get Spikes and a trade is "imminent"...

did anyone else see this on SC?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on March 26, 2007, 08:09:32 AM
Ed doesnt know stuff, he makes it up  :-D

I'm all for this, If he's trotts replacement thats fine.  We can get probably 3 more years out of Spikes.  Maybe get a younger guy in the draft and groom them, or just sneak into the Steelers facility and see what LB's they are scouting. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 26, 2007, 08:30:02 AM
Igy, for you to say you would rather have Dhani than him is crazy talk

never said id rather have dhani...i just wouldnt give up anything for spikes...hell be 31 before the end of the season is an achilles survivor coming off a terrible year where he had 10 less tackles than dhani jones...the guy had 43 tackles the entire season...awful

would i rather have him than dhani of course....do i think this is a steal or some sort of power move no...simply put i wouldnt trade anything for him or give him a big rework on his deal...as i said i also dont think hes a sam anymore (tho hes still probably better than dhani)

i want a quality young guy to develop...im tired of stop gap guys in their 30's...takeo spikes isnt taking this team to the superbowl...and i dont think they should give up a draft pick and a new contract to someone like that just because i hate dhani jones
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on March 26, 2007, 08:49:02 AM
Get Levon!

If they give up a 6th or 5th, do it.  Maybe package Walker.  Anyone have a rough idea what Walkers value would be?  He had 7 or 8 sacks last year, I read somewhere last year that he's in the top 6 for DT sacks over the past 5 years?  Could he somehow net you back a 3rd?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 26, 2007, 09:01:03 AM
no way is walker worth a day one pick...i think hes more like a 5th...im not sure why you trade him tho...as we stand here now hes their best interior lineman

you cant think hes worth a third and at the same time be so cavalier about dealing him...i mean is such a good player hell net you a third or does he stink and you want him gone?

i personally deal him because the eagles are treating this upcoming season as a wasted one with mcnabb no good...and thats fine...so start a rebuilding process by getting as many young players in here as possible that could potentially turn into big time players down the road
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on March 26, 2007, 10:59:38 AM
Spikes apparently IS at the Novacare Center this morning
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: NGM on March 26, 2007, 11:05:53 AM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on March 26, 2007, 10:59:38 AM
Spikes apparently IS at the Novacare Center this morning

Here we go again.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on March 26, 2007, 11:13:07 AM
My buddy is a Buffalo fan and he's despondent over potentially losing Spikes.

He was furious when the Flyers got Biron but now he's angry and maybe a little suicidal.

I'm not kidding either.   :-D


PS: It's gonna be really funny when the Flyers snap up Daniel Briere in free agency this summer.   :-D :-D
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 26, 2007, 11:16:56 AM
and chris drury
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: DH on March 26, 2007, 11:18:16 AM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on March 26, 2007, 10:59:38 AM
Spikes apparently IS at the Novacare Center this morning

Where did you hear this?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on March 26, 2007, 11:20:08 AM
LeCharles Bentley IM'd him.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on March 26, 2007, 11:20:43 AM
Quote from: Die-Hard on March 26, 2007, 11:18:16 AM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on March 26, 2007, 10:59:38 AM
Spikes apparently IS at the Novacare Center this morning

Where did you hear this?
Its a running joke from last offseason
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on March 26, 2007, 11:22:28 AM
haha, Die-Hard's dumb
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on March 26, 2007, 11:22:29 AM
Quote from: Jerome99RIP on March 26, 2007, 11:20:08 AM
LeCharles Bentley IM'd him.

Good guess, but it was actually Javon Walker's limo driver
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: DH on March 26, 2007, 11:23:04 AM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on March 26, 2007, 11:20:43 AM
Quote from: Die-Hard on March 26, 2007, 11:18:16 AM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on March 26, 2007, 10:59:38 AM
Spikes apparently IS at the Novacare Center this morning

Where did you hear this?
Its a running joke from last offseason

I knew that, but I thought he actually was there.

Thanks for getting my hopes up, jerk.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on March 26, 2007, 11:23:25 AM
Javon Walker will be an Eagle by Draft day :-D
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on March 26, 2007, 11:26:30 AM
It's amazing to think that this thread still has almost six months of life left in it.

Amazing...? wait, wrong word.

DEPRESSING is the right word.

:boom
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on March 26, 2007, 11:50:48 AM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on March 26, 2007, 11:20:43 AM
Quote from: Die-Hard on March 26, 2007, 11:18:16 AM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on March 26, 2007, 10:59:38 AM
Spikes apparently IS at the Novacare Center this morning

Where did you hear this?
Its a running joke from last offseason

That, plus WIP is saying Spikes will be in town today or tomorrow for a physical, but I'll go with the running joke....
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhanInDC on March 26, 2007, 12:01:34 PM
Quote
Bills | Team near a trade of Spikes
Mon, 26 Mar 2007 08:49:03 -0700

Mark Gaughan, of the Buffalo News, reports the Buffalo Bills are getting closer to trading LB Takeo Spikes after trade negotiations gained steam over the weekend.

ESPN Insider:

Quote
Eagles eyeing Spikes?
<Mar. 26> The Eagles are the most aggressive team in pursuing a trade for Spikes, according to ESPN's Chris Mortensen. The Buffalo News is reporting that numerous teams are interested in the 30-year-old linebacker and that a deal could be consummated in a day or two.
Spikes is entering the final year of his contract with Buffalo, which has granted Spikes permission to scout potential trade partners. Coming off an Achilles tendon injury, Spikes played in 12 games last season. He finished with 70 tackles and one sack.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on March 26, 2007, 12:01:44 PM
a physical to approve a trade, or a physical to determine the validity of trading for him?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on March 26, 2007, 12:04:46 PM
I feel like WIP is run by magic leprechauns hell bent on circulating mis-information and stirring up trouble while they sit atop their piles of gold, maniacally laughing at every one of their listeners.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on March 26, 2007, 12:04:47 PM
Probably the latter, like the Giants did with Wilson...
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on March 26, 2007, 12:17:58 PM
Quote from: rjs246 on March 26, 2007, 12:04:46 PM
I feel like WIP is run by magic leprechauns hell bent on circulating mis-information and stirring up trouble while they sit atop their piles of gold, maniacally laughing at every one of their listeners.

You had to edit this?

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on March 26, 2007, 12:28:34 PM
I had a typo. What can I say? I'm a perfectionist.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on March 26, 2007, 12:35:03 PM
You misspelled WIP didn't you?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on March 26, 2007, 12:36:16 PM
Yes. I thought it had a '7' in it.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 26, 2007, 12:57:42 PM
Quote from: rjs246 on March 26, 2007, 12:04:46 PM
I feel like WIP is run by magic leprechauns hell bent on circulating mis-information and stirring up trouble while they sit atop their piles of gold, maniacally laughing at every one of their listeners.

Your mom's a leprechaun.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: bowzer on March 26, 2007, 01:45:12 PM
Why does it seem like the Eagles are stuck in 2003??
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on March 26, 2007, 02:06:24 PM
some posters on PhilaPhans, who know another poster who has given some inside info before, seem to think it's going to get done for the Eagles, we shall see
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 26, 2007, 02:45:22 PM
Quote from: SunMo on March 26, 2007, 02:06:24 PM
some posters on PhilaPhans, who know another poster who has given some inside info before, seem to think it's going to get done for the Eagles, we shall see

BigEd76
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: phillywin2k5 on March 26, 2007, 02:49:49 PM
funny how for the last how many years they talked about not signing players over 30, yet they sign Reagor and possibly trade for Spikes in the same month! And Spikes will probably be the same deal as Stallworth, like a 5th that becomes a 4th if the Eagles re-sign him before next year...
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: phattymatty on March 26, 2007, 03:01:24 PM
i've been thinking about what jersey to get for next year since i did so much damage to my patteron jersey, and because he sucks balls, so i think i'll get spikes if he comes here.  that name is too rad.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on March 26, 2007, 03:08:37 PM
Quote from: SunMo on March 26, 2007, 02:06:24 PM
some posters on PhilaPhans, who know another poster who has given some inside info before, seem to think it's going to get done for the Eagles, we shall see


From that thread...

QuoteTakeo Spikes is represented by the guy who kicked for the Eagles while Akers was injured in '05?

:-D :-D
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: phillywin2k5 on March 26, 2007, 03:36:36 PM
Quote from: phattymatty on March 26, 2007, 03:01:24 PM
i've been thinking about what jersey to get for next year since i did so much damage to my patteron jersey, and because he sucks balls, so i think i'll get spikes if he comes here.  that name is too rad.

only safe player jerseys to get for the next 5 years is Westbrook or Andrews
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on March 26, 2007, 03:37:48 PM
don't forget Reno
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 26, 2007, 03:39:50 PM
a throwback of some kind is the only accpetable answer here
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on March 26, 2007, 03:41:52 PM
Andre Waters?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 26, 2007, 03:54:04 PM
sure
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on March 26, 2007, 04:57:24 PM
Quote from: FastFreddie on March 26, 2007, 02:45:22 PM
Quote from: SunMo on March 26, 2007, 02:06:24 PM
some posters on PhilaPhans, who know another poster who has given some inside info before, seem to think it's going to get done for the Eagles, we shall see

BigEd76

Wasn't me.  I'm not on PhilaPhans.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on March 26, 2007, 06:52:25 PM
Take this fwiw regarding Spikes since its from someone on the EMB, only reason I take it half way serious is because he's been there for a while:
QuoteWe have a trade just gotta get the new contract done. 

I'm listen to the 2LiveStews on 790am The Zone here in Atlanta. TKO is very good friends with Ryan Stewart and Doug Stewart. He has been on the show many times before. They just said they had a talk with him. He told them once everything is finally he will come on their show. I just heard this so take it for what it's worth. You can call their show to ask them if you do not believe me.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MDS on March 26, 2007, 07:10:31 PM
the emb never lies.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on March 26, 2007, 07:20:59 PM
That's what I thought until I saw who posted it.

The guy who posted that isn't a troll or a TATEr or whatever.  He's been there forever and isn't prone to posting bullshtein.

Whatever though.  We'll find out soon enough.  The suspense isn't exactly killing us.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on March 26, 2007, 07:43:15 PM
I can actually back up that claim.  Spikes is on there all the time and I heard the show today when Stewart said that.

I can tell you that the poster isn't lying anyway.  Now if what they said on the radio was true... dunno about all that.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: QB Eagles on March 26, 2007, 07:52:19 PM
QuoteAccording to the proposed trade, the Eagles would also acquire veteran quarterback Kelly Holcomb. It is not known what Philadelphia would surrender to the Bills in the trade. The Bills have discussed Spikes trade scenarios with other clubs as well, but none of those have progressed as far as the talks with the Eagles.

Spikes and... Holcomb? (http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2813818&campaign=rss&source=NFLHeadlines)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on March 26, 2007, 08:04:03 PM
I just saw that and was coming to post it.  Holcomb played pretty well in spots for them.  I wouldn't mind him as the 3rd or whatever... but damn... this is the same guy that got beat out by J.P. Losman.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 26, 2007, 08:06:52 PM
holcolmbs name being involved doesnt exactly give me warm fuzzies about mcnabbs rehab
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on March 26, 2007, 08:08:04 PM
So he'd have to beat out whatever stiff the Eagles brought in as a training camp body for the #3 QB, right?

Because that's all he'd be in Philly... a #3.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 26, 2007, 08:11:33 PM
hed be a two if mcnabb isnt ready next year or gets hurt again when he does come back

why do some people assume that mcnabb is just gonna come right back on the field and be fine
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on March 26, 2007, 08:17:28 PM
Probably for the same reason you assume he won't.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: QB Eagles on March 26, 2007, 08:19:45 PM
I'll reserve judgement on adding Holcolmb to the mix until we see what the Eagles are giving up.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 26, 2007, 08:25:54 PM
Probably for the same reason you assume he won't.


if he wasnt coming off a real serious knee injury there would be a question as to whether he can finish the year or not

but with this knee it is 50/50 whether hes ready for the opener...and even if he is theres virtually no chance hes 100%...then add in the psychological aspect of the injury plus the chance of reinjury and you have a recipe for him not being ready for some or all of the season...hence the holcomb rumors
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on March 26, 2007, 08:36:58 PM
You're assuming that McNabb won't be ready.  I don't think the Eagles are thinking that way.  I think they fully expect him to be ready when the season starts.

I further think the Eagles realize that a reliable veteran backup is good to have in the event of a mega-disaster (meaning both McNabb & Feeley go down or aren't available).

Again, they have their #2 in Feeley.  Holcomb isn't a threat to start unless a catastrophe happens. (God forbid).

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: DH on March 26, 2007, 08:38:31 PM
Done deal.

Spikes and Holcomb for Darwin and a conditional pick.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 26, 2007, 08:40:34 PM
solid deal

day two of the draft this year is gonna suck...for viewing purposes if nothing else
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: DH on March 26, 2007, 08:42:12 PM
very solid deal....emb'ers are saying its a 2008 7th rounder. take it for what its worth.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Don Ho on March 26, 2007, 09:00:59 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on March 26, 2007, 08:06:52 PM
holcolmbs name being involved doesnt exactly give me warm fuzzies about mcnabbs rehab

timmy chang?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on March 26, 2007, 09:12:52 PM
Nice deal... real nice.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on March 26, 2007, 09:23:30 PM
Maybe they didn't feel like wasting a draft pick on a 3rd-string QB this year or next...
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 26, 2007, 09:31:59 PM
I'm just glad we will no longer have to speculate on the status of Darwin Walker's thigh.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on March 26, 2007, 09:33:43 PM
Quote from: BigEd76 on March 26, 2007, 09:23:30 PM
Maybe they didn't feel like wasting a draft pick on a 3rd-string QB this year or next...

Word is that Holcomb has experience as the holder from back in Cleveland as well (Moorman held in Buffalo).... hmmmm.


Could this put one of Diggler's feet out the door if the rugby guy's ready to push out the other?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: phattymatty on March 26, 2007, 10:19:40 PM
Quote from: EagleFeva on March 26, 2007, 09:33:43 PM
Word is that Holcomb has experience as the holder from back in Cleveland as well (Moorman held in Buffalo).... hmmmm.

you said mormon.  andy is calling him right now.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhanInDC on March 27, 2007, 03:00:29 PM
Nice farging editing Spew:
Quote
March, 2007: A Month To Rember For Eagles 
March 27, 2007
March, 2007. A month to remember. A period of four weeks during which the Eagles' grand blueprint for the off-season unfolded before our very eyes.

A series of weeks during which the Eagles were as active as any team in the NFL, moving and shaking up a roster and believing, as they stand one month away from the NFL draft, that they have taken this team to a new level. Potentially, of course. We are all projecting.

In the course of this month, the Eagles have smashed myths and destroyed the idea that they would dip their toes into the free-agency (and trade) waters. No, the Eagles dived in head first and addressed needs up and down the lineup.

The Eagles made bold moves. They spent a lot of money -- which, to be factually correct, is something they have always done, ranking among the top two or three spenders among NFL teams in the last decade -- and they lured big-ticket free agents to Philadelphia. They made a decisive trade on Monday night, acquiring linebacker Takeo Spikes and quarterback Kelly Holcomb, setting themselves up nicely for next month's draft.

The plan really started when the team made the decision to extend the contract of quarterback A.J. Feeley on February 25. That set into motion a series of events that, despite criticism from the outside, did not alter the course the Eagles knew they had to take.

In extending Feeley, the Eagles essentially said goodbye to Jeff Garcia, who took over down the stretch in 2006 and led the Eagles into the playoffs. At the time, the Eagles took heat in some circles for the decision. In retrospect, the way things worked out, allowing Garcia to leave was the right thing to do, and it helped the Eagles manage the salary cap to execute a number of other deals.

After Feeley, the Eagles went about the business of retaining their own potential free agents. They inked safety Quintin Mikell, a key member of the defense and of the special teams, to a four-year contract just prior to free agency. They locked up valuable defensive end Juqua Thomas to a five-year deal and secured some depth at that position.

Then came the tough part for all the fans: Patience. Nearly a week passed before the Eagles made another signing, and when they did it was not of the $35-million variety. It was a no-risk, high-reward deal, bringing in wide receiver/kick return man Bethel Johnson. No hoopla surrounded the move. The headlines were minimal. But the Eagles wanted some insurance in the return game and they wanted a prospect at wide receiver and they wanted speed, and they got all three in Johnson.

A day later, the Eagles re-signed cornerback William James -- a move to provide depth and competition at the position -- and hosted restricted free agent linebacker Ryan Fowler and, here was a huge surprise, unrestricted free agent Kevin Curtis.

It became clear at this point to those paying attention that the Eagles were moving methodically, with a very strong sense of purpose in the off-season.

Eventually, the interest in Fowler died  :-D when he signed an offer sheet with Tennessee after initially agreeing to a deal with the Eagles, and combined with the loss of wide receiver Donte' Stallworth, morale sagged among Eagles faithful.

More patience and understanding. The Eagles still had irons in the fire.

And what has resulted is two of the best weeks in free-agency history here.

First, Curtis agreed to terms on a six-year contract to give the Eagles another speedy threat in the passing game. Curtis, one of the most chased players in free agency, should be a perfect fit in the offense, and he has the tools to stretch defenses and drive cornerbacks batty in this scheme.

Six days later, the Eagles came out of the blue and signed defensive tackle Montae Reagor, a veteran who has been a good player in this league and who brings the right kind of total package to the defense. But why, some wondered, would the Eagles sign another 285-pound defensive tackle when they had a couple of pretty good ones already?

As it turned out, the Eagles knew exactly what they were doing. They traded one of those pretty good tackles, Darwin Walker, to the Bills, along with a conditional draft pick in 2008, to Buffalo for Spikes and Holcomb.

And now?

Now the Eagles look really, really loaded. There is still a lot of work to be done. Nobody is taking anything for granted. But the Eagles, in this last month, have generated the kind of momentum we haven't seen here since the off-season prior to the 2004 campaign. The Eagles have used their salary-cap room brilliantly, locking up a gaggle of young and talented players to long-term contracts and still having one of the most -- the most, maybe, right there with New England? -- active off-seasons in the NFL.

Remarkable.

"When we signed Montae Reagor, people around the league realized we had some extra depth at defensive tackle, which was a position most teams put a high priority on," said team president Joe Banner. "Teams called us about our defensive tackle situation and there were a few teams we reached out to, and in the instance of Buffalo they had a strong opinion of Darwin so we were able to engage in conversations about compensation.

"Linebacker was one of the areas we were looking to upgrade, so they had a little bit of an abundance there, so it was a good fit. We just had to work out the details exactly who and how many."


As for the scope of the off-season, Banner and the Eagles deserve a lot of credit for doing what they have done. Who thought coming into March that the Eagles would be as active as they have been, or that they would land these high-profile players or that they would shake up the roster as they have?

Raise your hands. Hey, you in the back ...

"It's been satisfying and we've done some moves that we had hoped for," said Banner. "Sometimes you can't do all the things you plan. So far, we've been able to stay really strong at the wide receiver position, at which we were losing a starter (Stallworth) and at the same time we re-signed some of our own guys which gave us real good, quality character guys and some real good depth, so we have some real insulation from injuries.

"Then we added Reagor, who we think is a good player and a high-character guy and that gave us the flexibility to make the trade to get some depth at the quarterback position (Holcomb) and add a linebacker (Spikes) that is capable of making a really big difference. He also fits in to what we do really well. He is a guy who can blitz and run and cover -- all the different things we do are his strengths, so he should be a really good addition."

I admit that during the time since the 2006 season ended, I have taken some of the criticism personally. It bothers me to hear and see the opinions that have been out there. Why couldn't everyone just wait to see where the off-season path would take the Eagles? I guess that isn't the way it works now. Everybody wants to read the end of the book before the first chapter is finished ...

The Eagles have been aggressive, they have spent top dollar, they have gone after what they think are prime-time players at wide receiver and at linebacker.

It remains to be seen, of course, how it is all going to unfold on the field. A lot of pieces have to come together to reach the Super Bowl. A lot of luck is involved. Good bounces are welcome. Great health is necessary.

But the chips are lined up, aren't they? The Eagles are likely to continue to make moves -- they are in an extremely aggressive mode right now -- and they are going to tinker with roster to add depth and talent across the board.

It has been, in retrospect, one of the greatest, on-the-edge-of-your-seats off-seasons ever. Ever. It was agonizing, frustrating, exhilarating, thrilling and, in the end, very, very productive. The Eagles put forth a game plan internally and then went out and executed it.

March, 2007. Mark it down. Remember it for what it ultimately means in the season ahead and in years to come.

Brilliantly vomit inducing.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 27, 2007, 03:14:40 PM
thanks...my lunch just came up




Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: phattymatty on March 27, 2007, 03:27:40 PM
so their interest died when he signed with another team?  what a scoop.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on March 27, 2007, 03:37:41 PM
hey I know what will be fun, maybe someone can post what spadaro wrote about this, and we can all act horrified and pukey!!

that would be a fresh thing to do..we never do that!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhanInDC on March 27, 2007, 03:46:22 PM
Quote from: Diomedes on March 27, 2007, 03:37:41 PM
hey I know what will be fun, maybe someone can post what spadaro wrote about this, and we can all act horrified and pukey!!

that would be a fresh thing to do..we never do that!

Or maybe we could just take the time to post about how stupid it is and how it pisses us off so much, completely ignoring the fact that if it bothers us, we could ignore it! Righteous!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on March 27, 2007, 03:49:18 PM
Quote from: PPinDC on March 27, 2007, 03:00:29 PM
Nice farging editing Spew:
Quote
Eventually, the interest in Fowler died when he signed an offer sheet with Tennessee after initially agreeing to a deal with the Eagles, and combined with the loss of wide receiver Donte' Stallworth, morale sagged among Eagles faithful.

More patience and understanding. The Eagles still had irons in the fire.

And what has resulted is two of the best weeks in free-agency history here.

First, Curtis agreed to terms on a six-year contract .............Six days later, the Eagles came out of the blue and signed defensive tackle Montae Reagor

Kevin Curtis and Montae Reagor constitute the best 2 weeks of free agency in Eagles history?  :-D

Actually, that may very well be true.   :'( :'(

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on March 27, 2007, 04:06:48 PM
Quote from: PPinDC on March 27, 2007, 03:46:22 PMOr maybe we could just take the time to post about how stupid it is and how it pisses us off so much, completely ignoring the fact that if it bothers us, we could ignore it! Righteous!

I def. like your idea better. 

If you want to cry over Spadaro's crap, why not do it at TATE?? 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhanInDC on March 27, 2007, 04:10:35 PM
Because TATE makes me cry..........more than Spew.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on March 27, 2007, 04:11:05 PM
(http://boards.philadelphiaeagles.com/style_images/1/f_spadaro.jpg)
Hi guys
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 27, 2007, 04:14:51 PM
^^^^
lol



hey I know what will be fun, maybe someone can post what spadaro wrote about this, and we can all act horrified and pukey!!

that would be a fresh thing to do..we never do that!



ha...so salty
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Eaglez on March 27, 2007, 04:22:21 PM
Spadaro uses hyperbole a lot. Anyone and everyone knows this. However, that latest column goes over the edge. Seriously. I think Spadaro established a new standard for himself on that one.

This off-season constitutes the best off-season ever? Why? Because the Eagles re-signed a back-up QB, a special teamer, and a spot pass rusher?

And then they go out and get a WR (sure, it is a need position -- but I wouldn't consider Curtis a top flight WR; a good one? probably, and maybe he'll break out; but it would be a fair argument to make that the Eagles might have overpaid for his services).

And then they go out and get Spikes. Good pick-up. But is he the same player he was? He's a physical linebacker that is good against the run who has a surgically re-constructed Achilles tendon who is getting older. Don't get me wrong; this is a HUGE upgrade to the LB corps and demonstrates that maybe -- just maybe -- the Eagles will stop neglecting the LBs if they are serious about stopping the run, especially if they want to employ an undersized D-line across the board.

But best off-season ever? Gimme a break. Signing Jevon Kearse and Terrell Owens in the same off-season probably constituted the best off-season in recent memory -- without the benefit of hindsight, of course. When the Eagles made those two signings, I don't think anyone was disappointed and realized the Eagles were making a run at the whole thing. These signings and trades (Curtis and Spikes) don't elicit the same excitement.

Up there with the Patriots? Don't think so. The Pats signed the best LB in FA , arguably the best WR (or the WR with the most playmaking ability in Stallworth) Welker, who is pretty much a younger version of Curtis who can also return kicks, and a few other signings that add depth (I think). And what about the 49ers? They think they can win as well. Just a stupid column all around.

Good step in the right direction -- but I hope the Eagles don't rest on their laurels when there are still huge holes to fill (LB depth, SS, and possibly another CB).
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 27, 2007, 04:34:55 PM
Spadaro uses hyperbole a lot. Anyone and everyone knows this. However, that latest column goes over the edge. Seriously. I think Spadaro established a new standard for himself on that one.

it really was the most agregious column hes ever written

what i think it was was a culmination of all the shtein he and the team has taken thruout this free agency period...and this was his (and the FO) chance to attack all the haters that have been making his life miserable...basically the nerd wet himself when the eagles got spikes got all out of sorts and ran to his computer with a lot of pent up venom...and out came one of the most laughable articles ever written on any football team

the comparison to new england is especially bad...new england signed your number one FA and the number one FA at his position yet youre gonna credit the eagles for signing an inferior player to replace the one new england took from you???

granted its not saying much but the eagles also lost their best DT in the spikes trade...reagor replaced him in what can be considered only a lateral move

so the curtis and reagor moves combined are a negative

spikes is a plus no doubt and i like the bethel johnson move

so basically hes saying getting takeo spikes and bethel johnson = the best few weeks in eagle offseason history...even tho you can make an argument that the team is worse off since free agency began than it was when it started

amazing
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on March 27, 2007, 04:41:06 PM
more spadaro analysis?

Yes please!  May I have another??

you people suck.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 27, 2007, 04:43:32 PM
CRY!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on March 27, 2007, 04:45:03 PM
SUCK
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MURP on March 27, 2007, 04:46:45 PM
Spewdaros last article puts him in ARTS league.   Sad. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Beermonkey on March 27, 2007, 04:53:37 PM
Quote from: Diomedes on March 27, 2007, 04:41:06 PM
more spadaro analysis?

Yes please!  May I have another??

you people suck.

It's like people criticizing skunks because they smell. Of course they smell, that's their nature. You either live with the scent or avoid skunks.

That is my little piece of down home advice for the week.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Eaglez on March 27, 2007, 04:56:06 PM
I usually don't rip on Spadaro, Dio. But that column was particularly bad. I have to agree with IGY's analysis. It seems as though, based on Spadaro's writing, that he was really going over the top proclaiming that this was the best off-season ever. I'd like to see Spadaro say that with a straight face.

In order to be the best off-season ever the Eagles would need to be -- for me -- in a substantially better position now than they were at the end of the season. The only real upgrade was Spikes. That's it. Curtis replaced Stallworth, which may or may not be a good move; I'm not ready to throw Curtis under the bus, I think he can be a productive player and could provide some big plays similar to what Stallworth brought to the table last year, but he's not a player I'm going to cream my pants over. He's good; he's solid -- that's it. The rest was just the Eagles re-signing depth and getting Spikes.

the Eagles still need to get better LB and/or WILL/SAM starting LB (depending on where Spikes is) depth (or someone to push Gaither/McCoy/Gocong), a SS for depth/push or supplant Considine, and a CB to push James in case James blows out his knee again. Maybe even a RB to push Buck and get short yardage.

There is seemingly a lot more questions pertaining to personnel that the Eagles need to answer, and to say that this is the "best off-season ever" after they pretty much only netted Spikes is pretty pitiful.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on March 27, 2007, 04:59:21 PM
Quote from: Beermonkey on March 27, 2007, 04:53:37 PM..advice for the week.

Fair enough.  But I don't hang out at EMB because I prefer to avoid crap like this.  Lately, heads have been obsessing over Spadaro and posting whatever he says all over this forum.  I don't give a farg what Spadaro says or what vigy thinks about what he says.  If I did, I'd chill at EMB.

Still, point took.   I find myself ignoring more and more lately.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Mad-Lad on March 27, 2007, 05:02:07 PM
Quote from: Diomedes on March 27, 2007, 04:59:21 PM
I find myself ignoring more and more lately.

Welcome to the club.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on March 27, 2007, 05:02:28 PM
Remember that Ask Freddie Mitchell section we had for a week here on CF? Boy, those were the days.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 27, 2007, 05:03:22 PM
In order to be the best off-season ever the Eagles would need to be -- for me -- in a substantially better position now than they were at the end of the season

keep stallworth
trade for spikes
sign reagor and johnson

and it would have been a great offseason but still not even the best ever

shtein...just keep stallworth and trade for spikes and its a very good offseason...

i dont ask for much...but all they did this offseason...outside of getting spikes...is replace guys they lost


spikes good

the rest lateral moves



Fair enough.  But I don't hang out at EMB because I prefer to avoid crap like this.  Lately, heads have been obsessing over Spadaro and posting whatever he says all over this forum.  I don't give a farg what Spadaro says or what vigy thinks about what he says.  If I did, I'd chill at EMB.

Still, point took.   I find myself ignoring more and more lately.



he was talking to the spadaro haters genius
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 27, 2007, 05:14:47 PM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on March 27, 2007, 05:02:28 PM
Remember that Ask Freddie Mitchell section we had for a week here on CF? Boy, those were the days.

GET FREDDIE MITCHELL!! HOLLAZ Z0MG!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MURP on March 27, 2007, 05:36:45 PM
people forget this site was built on things like making fun of Spewdaro. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on March 27, 2007, 05:56:58 PM
"Livin the High Life"
I can't find that stupid picture of him with the Miller can
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on March 27, 2007, 06:25:34 PM
Quote from: MURP on March 27, 2007, 05:36:45 PM
people forget this site was built on things like making fun of Spewdaro. 

I thought it was built to help satisfy GF's unquenchable thirst for power on the internets and that making fun of Spads was just a side perk. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: QB Eagles on March 27, 2007, 06:43:16 PM
Quote from: MURP on March 27, 2007, 04:46:45 PM
Spewdaros last article puts him in ARTS league.   Sad. 

Dude's been desperate for good Eagle news, as he has been taking a beating from the fans for weeks and hasn't really been able to say anything positive in response. So now that he finally has good news, he's going way overboard about it, even by his usual Spewriffic standards. Not surprising behavior, but the articles truly are getting more looney than usual.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Beermonkey on March 27, 2007, 06:49:32 PM
Quote from: Diomedes on March 27, 2007, 04:59:21 PM
Quote from: Beermonkey on March 27, 2007, 04:53:37 PM..advice for the week.

Fair enough.  But I don't hang out at EMB because I prefer to avoid crap like this.  Lately, heads have been obsessing over Spadaro and posting whatever he says all over this forum.  I don't give a farg what Spadaro says or what vigy thinks about what he says.  If I did, I'd chill at EMB.

Still, point took.   I find myself ignoring more and more lately.

Actually, I was talking about everyone else, not you.  :D
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: General_Failure on March 27, 2007, 11:14:12 PM
Quote from: Sgt PSN on March 27, 2007, 06:25:34 PM
Quote from: MURP on March 27, 2007, 05:36:45 PM
people forget this site was built on things like making fun of Spewdaro. 

I thought it was built to help satisfy GF's unquenchable thirst for power on the internets and that making fun of Spads was just a side perk. 

Well, yeah. Ironically, it got quenched and we moved full-time to making fun of Spadaro. Then that got old, so we moved on to selling your email addresses to RazorGator.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on March 28, 2007, 03:55:38 PM
Quote"I'll probably let Marty call 'em this year," Reid said. "I thought he did a nice job. I have a lot of trust in Marty. You have to remember, Marty and I go way back. I started doing that [giving up play-calling] with Brad [Childress]. And then at end of year, I started doing it with Marty. I stepped back and kind of watched when he was calling [the plays]. I felt real good about it. It freed me up to see a little bit more of what was going on."

* The Eagles will continue to run the ball as much in '07 with McNabb as they did late last year after Jeff Garcia took over. "It will probably be very similar, yeah," Reid said. "It'll probably be very similar to how we finished the season."

Double wood.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 28, 2007, 03:59:55 PM
thats cause they know AJ will be the starting QB in sept...if i see them running the ball when a healthy mcnabb is back behind center then ill believe it
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Dillen on March 28, 2007, 04:10:39 PM
My computer hasnt worked for about a week so I havent been able to really find out a lot.

I didn't like the Montae Reagor deal because I really didnt see the point in having another undersized DT pass rush specialist.

Second, the Spikes trade is pretty sweet. farg Darwin Walker. I can deal with Reagor, supposedly he's pretty much the same player as Walker but I dont hate him yet so it's all good. Is the pick really a "conditional 7th rounder"?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on March 28, 2007, 04:10:58 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on March 28, 2007, 03:59:55 PM
thats cause they know AJ will be the starting QB in sept...if i see them running the ball when a healthy mcnabb is back behind center then ill believe it

(http://www.eqperformance.com/mambo/images/stories/glass_half_full.jpg)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Magical_Retard on March 28, 2007, 06:54:07 PM
Quote from: Jerome99RIP on March 28, 2007, 04:10:58 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on March 28, 2007, 03:59:55 PM
thats cause they know AJ will be the starting QB in sept...if i see them running the ball when a healthy mcnabb is back behind center then ill believe it

(http://www.eqperformance.com/mambo/images/stories/glass_half_full.jpg)


dont forget the eagles are already giving up on this upcoming season.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 28, 2007, 09:20:26 PM
if they think they can win the superbowl with aj feely and/or a broke donovan mcnabb then they are more stupid than i thought

shtein theres a huge question whether a healthy mcnabb can win a superbowl
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Magical_Retard on March 28, 2007, 10:20:15 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on March 28, 2007, 09:20:26 PM
if they think they can win the superbowl with aj feely and/or a broke donovan mcnabb then they are more stupid than i thought

shtein theres a huge question whether a healthy mcnabb can win a superbowl

thats not the point. what did u want them to do? sign a QB of mcnabbs calibur or better? even if mcnabb comes back at say 80% to begin with they can manage if they stick to the running game. but throwing the season away? that would imply trying to get a certain player in the draft or something. considering how weak the nfc, esp the nfc east. is its not a stretch to imagine them making the playoffs again. they are banking on a lot with mcnabb coming back healthy but im pretty sure they think they can win a few games with feely if need be.

im not a fan of all the moves they have made this off season but its pretty much similar to all off seasons we have had besides the 04 off season...so they are either throwing every season away or they just think they can compete and go far with what they have. i wish we did a lot more and didnt let go of stallworth but im not going to claim this season is lost here in march...esp considering the division.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 29, 2007, 06:37:13 AM
dont get me wrong im not mad at them at all for what they havent or have done...its not their fault mcnabb blew up a knee and wont be 100% until 08...all im saying is their offseason is indicitive of the fact that they know this upcoming season is a long shot at best as far as a title because the qb position is what it is

for example you dont let the best wr on the market leave your team for a minimal money unless you realize that since your qb position is up in the air he really wont help much

i actually agree with what they have done this offseason...this is the one time they shouldnt go buckwild precisely because they cant win a superbowl next year...so kind of plug the leaks like they have and circle the wagons for what hopefully will be a championship run in 08...remember in addition to mcnabb being back at 100% in 08 they should have a nice chink of change next offseason...this year they didnt have that

to me everything points towards that 08 superbowl...now if next march they do what they did this march then ill be pissed off to no end
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on March 29, 2007, 09:18:57 AM
If you really think McNabb won't be right until '08... you might wanna read up on ACL tears.  I guess Javon Walker wasn't "right" this past season when he had the 2nd most productive year of his career helped by studs Plummer and Cutler.

You also know them letting Stallworth go had nothing to do with McNabb's condition.  Evidenced by the fact that they signed another WR for "more" money.

C'mon, igs...
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: mussa on March 29, 2007, 09:31:23 AM
keep throwing in fuel IGY
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 29, 2007, 09:35:57 AM
well i disagree about mcnabb...walker had his surgery in sept...and he even said he didnt feel right until a month into the season...mcnabb had his surgery in december...three months after walker...getting holcomb tells me that even the eagles arent sure about mcnabbs availability for the upcoming season

but if youre corect then the team has no defense for what theyve done...i was giving them the benefit of the doubt that the reason they havent improved the team this offseason is because they know they have no shot at the superbowl because of the qb position

because if mcnabb is gonna come back 100% both physically and mentally as you say and this is the team they are going in with then they should be ashamed of themselves

over half the starters on the defense are 30+ so there damn well should be some urgency to win a title now (not to mention the pro bowl qb is into his 30's with a long injury history)...especially with the young players on the defense being no good....whats gonna happen in two years?...this defense is gonna be horrendous

there should have been substantial improvements THIS offseason on a team that was a few plays away from the nfc title game...instead they are just treading water
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 29, 2007, 10:40:35 AM
I don't understand how anyone could believe that there is zero chance McNabb starts the season on the bench in the final stages of rehab.  He had a very severe injury.  His and Jevon Kearse's availability and effectiveness are far from givens.  That said, if they both are back to 100% fairly early in the season, I think the FO is still hoping for a run in 2007 and not necessarily planning for '08.

They wouldn't have received Kelly Holcomb in the deal if McNabb being at 100% from the get go was a done deal.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on March 29, 2007, 12:24:37 PM
Who said anything about a given that McNabb and/or Kearse are back from the start?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 29, 2007, 12:25:52 PM
Quote from: EagleFeva on March 29, 2007, 12:24:37 PM
Who said anything about a given that McNabb and/or Kearse are back from the start?

Well, then... why all the criticism for IGY's theory?  It's not without a shred of sense.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on March 29, 2007, 12:34:38 PM
Is anyone else worried about Kearses rehab and how they havent said anything about it in a long time(at least i havent heard anything since the end of the season)?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on March 29, 2007, 12:40:33 PM
Quote from: FastFreddie on March 29, 2007, 12:25:52 PM
Quote from: EagleFeva on March 29, 2007, 12:24:37 PM
Who said anything about a given that McNabb and/or Kearse are back from the start?

Well, then... why all the criticism for IGY's theory?  It's not without a shred of sense.

Because as stupid as it is to consider it a given that he comes back healthy... it's just as stupid to consider it a given that he's not healthy until '08.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: mussa on March 29, 2007, 12:43:42 PM
Quote from: Seabiscuit36 on March 29, 2007, 12:34:38 PM
Is anyone else worried about Kearses rehab and how they havent said anything about it in a long time(at least i havent heard anything since the end of the season)?

Um, I think someone posted that he's recovering very quick, the injury wasn't as bas as they thought and he will be ready for camp. not too long ago someone posted that. i think....
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 29, 2007, 12:53:17 PM
im more worried about kearse playing up to his capabilities for a full year at full strength than i am him not being healthy...tho his health is definitely something to track

as for my 'theory'...i dont think the eagles sat down one day in banners office and said we are done this year...if we had our choice we wouldnt even play the games...but i def think were mcnabb not coming off a serious injury a lot more would have been done (or at least considered) to make this team a superbowl contender...instead they basically did just enough to keep the ship afloat...with a ? at the qb position i dont think they felt as tho it was worth going all out and improving other spots on the team

stallworth ----------> curtis
walker --------> reagor
hood --------> james
lewis --------> considine

spikes
johnson

that doesnt scream lets take a shot at it to me...thats we made the playoffs last year...lets not take a step backwards and just take our chances


it's just as stupid to consider it a given that he's not healthy until '08.

but it is pretty much a given that it takes a year to get back to being 100%...could be longer could be shorter...its not a "given' either way but the evidence says that it takes that long....mcnabb had his surgery in december...do the math
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on March 29, 2007, 01:00:06 PM
I was told there would be no math.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 29, 2007, 01:07:45 PM
Carson Palmer got injured much later in the season but started the next year.  He did, however, wear a cumbersome brace and didn't seem to be 100%, even as a pocket passer.  McNabb, who still relies on his feet a lot, even if he doesn't run for yardage as much as when he was younger, would be even more affected...

So, basically... if McNabb can heal at the same rate as Palmer, he should be ready to throw and do limited stuff by training camp and should be good to go at nearly 100% for the start of the season.  However, I think Palmer's scenario is a best-case.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on March 29, 2007, 01:10:19 PM
So you're telling me that the Eagles saw opportunities to vastly improve this team with this year's FA's and instead of aggressively going after them, they said that since their QB position is "in question"... they'll let these players go elsewhere?  Simply because McNabb tore his ACL last season?

Take for example Adalius Thomas.  He got a 6 year deal or something like that right?  They basically said the 1 season of questionable health is more important than 6 years of a player with Thomas' abilities?  I can't but that.  I would think that if the Eagles really wanted him, they would still go after him and figure that at least they'll have him in the fold when McNabb does get all the way healthy.

On the same token... do you think they said to themselves when Stallworth was out there, "Well, McNabb may not be healthy anyway so we might as well let Donte go"?  By doing so... passing up on 6 years of a quality player who's in the middle of his prime?  That just doesn't make sense to me, man.  There are probably a number of reasons that Thomas and Stallworth are not here... but I just can't see McNabb's health as having anything to do with it.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on March 29, 2007, 01:11:39 PM
Quote from: FastFreddie on March 29, 2007, 01:07:45 PM
Carson Palmer got injured much later in the season but started the next year.  He did, however, wear a cumbersome brace and didn't seem to be 100%, even as a pocket passer.  McNabb, who still relies on his feet a lot, even if he doesn't run for yardage as much as when he was younger, would be even more affected...

So, basically... if McNabb can heal at the same rate as Palmer, he should be ready to throw and do limited stuff by training camp and should be good to go at nearly 100% for the start of the season.  However, I think Palmer's scenario is a best-case.

Now you know that Palmer's injury was more severe than McNabb's was.  3 torn ligaments versus 1.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on March 29, 2007, 01:14:04 PM
Bypassing Stallworth only to give Kevin Curtis the same deal tells me they didn't want Stallworth and they are going for it this year.

There are other reasons but that one sold me.  The Spikes trade only re-inforced my feelings on the matter.

They're going for it just like they do every year and to suggest otherwise like there's some nefarious plot to avoid competing for a championship is delusional and stupid.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 29, 2007, 01:18:39 PM
bwahahaha @ the kevin curtis signing signaling that the team is going for a superbowl title


if the front office thinks this team has a chance to win a superbowl then they are the dumbest motherfargers on the planet
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Magical_Retard on March 29, 2007, 01:23:33 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on March 29, 2007, 01:18:39 PM
bwahahaha @ the kevin curtis signing signaling that the team is going for a superbowl title


if the front office thinks this team has a chance to win a superbowl then they are the dumbest motherfargers on the planet

they always think so. they do this pretty much every off season. its not like their lack of action and letting good players go is something new or shocking. while to us it definetly seems like this team wont win a superbowl...in their minds they think they have a shot.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 29, 2007, 01:26:48 PM
i take it back then...i will no longer defend them on this offseason anymore and bring up mcnabb as a factor...they are just incompetant morons...

even when i try to give them the benefit of the doubt it doesnt work
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on March 29, 2007, 01:31:18 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on March 29, 2007, 01:18:39 PM
bwahahaha @ the kevin curtis signing signaling that the team is going for a superbowl title


if the front office thinks this team has a chance to win a superbowl then they are the dumbest motherfargers on the planet


If you feel that way then why bother spending even one second more following this team?



Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on March 29, 2007, 01:32:01 PM
We all follow the Flyers and they farging suck. Try to have a point before posting nonsense.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 29, 2007, 01:35:00 PM
If you feel that way then why bother spending even one second more following this team?

go ahead spads

youve learned from your master well
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Magical_Retard on March 29, 2007, 01:39:21 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on March 29, 2007, 01:26:48 PM
i take it back then...i will no longer defend them on this offseason anymore and bring up mcnabb as a factor...they are just incompetant morons...

even when i try to give them the benefit of the doubt it doesnt work

its not about giving them the benefit of doubt...this is how pretty much every off season is for us. i dont know why this offseason you would think they are really not making a run. in the ealgles mind they had another "superbowl" calibur team ready to go.

didnt u hear it was the best free agency period ever.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 29, 2007, 01:44:24 PM
i know youre right...maybe i was just trying to tell myself that it wasnt happening again and i was able to find some legitimate reasons why they shouldnt go for it all this year...

with mcnabb there are big time question marks on this team but in my heart i know that without a 100% healthy mcnabb this team has zero chance at the superbowl...and because i dont think they will have him at 100% this year i guess im not really upset at the FO this offseason and thus in a roundabout way i tried to make up a faux defense of them

basically i ignored their history and i look like an idiot for it
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: mussa on March 29, 2007, 02:01:46 PM
lets be honest. mcnabb or not, there's no way we can contend. westbrook is our main weapon on offense. the rest are subpar. mcnabb's not going to be mobile early. if the team doesn't establish a balanced offense mcnabb will be a sitting duck like the past 3 years. the run game really needs to the main attack. no question asked.

our D, just got a great upgrade at LB. other than that, nothing. same if not missing a rod hood. my only hope on D is that if we run the ball on offense manage the clock and keep the D rested as much as we can. we're not even close to being contenders. maybe in the NFC, but thats always an easy shot. we've got nothing to AFC teams.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on March 29, 2007, 02:11:28 PM
This team made the playoffs thanks to a massive collapse by the Giants and the disappearance of Dallas' defense to end the season. They've lost their best receiver and their nickel back (who is starting caliber) and have major questions at defensive line, linebacker and quarterback (due to injury).

But yeah, this team is definitely ready for a deep playoff run in '07.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on March 29, 2007, 03:13:02 PM
Quote"These fans are [always] going to come out fighting," Reid said. "They're going to be loud and aggressive. When we brought Ryan Fowler [a free-agent linebacker from Dallas] in for a visit, I asked him what I always ask guys we bring in: 'Are you sure you can handle Philadelphia?' And he said, 'Hey, what a great place. You drive a bus in [for a game], and it's like no place else. They're throwing eggs at us and everything else. I love that.'

Now who would ever do something like that?

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 29, 2007, 03:21:53 PM
our D, just got a great upgrade at LB. other than that, nothing. same if not missing a rod hood. my only hope on D is that if we run the ball on offense manage the clock and keep the D rested as much as we can.

agreed with everything you said

only thing id add about the defense is that its possible patterson and bunkley turn into players...if that happens then you all of a sudden have a totally different d....the chances that both at the same time elevate their games that much is not high but its possible...and with good tackles and healthy productive seasons from kearse and howard along side them the d all of a sudden becomes very formidable

thats a lot of 'ifs' tho
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Munson on March 29, 2007, 04:36:12 PM
I think the team could win with an 80% Donovan Mcnabb....IF they have the same commitment to the running game that they had late last year, and they run Westbrook/Buckhalter enough. Westbrook should be running the ball 18-20 times a game on average, with Buckhalter getting another 8 or so.

Now can they win the Super Bowl with that formula? Probably not, assuming the defense doesn't pick up it's game enough. Like IGY just said, IF Bunkley or Patterson pick up thier game, that would immediately be an improvement over last year. Kearse staying healthy for the entire year would also be big, as keeping Cole fresh and bringing him in on the edge with Kearse was causing fits for offensive lines, who then also had to contend with Howard inside. Now if Bunkley can become a force...then a 3rd down line of Cole-Howard-Bunkley-Kearse would be damn nasty for opposing offenses to face. Not to mention they can throw J. Thomas in there as another "fastball" sometimes, and he's proven to be pretty effective in that role.


Meh, guess we'll see what happens.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 29, 2007, 04:45:19 PM
Quote from: Munson on March 29, 2007, 04:36:12 PM
they can throw J. Thomas in there as another "fastball" sometimes

Use your belt to hang yourself a la James Dungy, please.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on March 29, 2007, 04:47:09 PM
I was pissed at this offseason in the early stages, but I have to admit the Eagles did a quite a fine job this offseason. If you aren't impressed with what they did, you have to factor in what was available. This was a weak free agent crop, and with the money the Eagles have compared with who was out there, I think the Eagles did a nice job. They didn't go crazy and overpay for the top guys, and got players that are close to just as good for a lot better value.

As for the guys we lost:

Hood? I wanted him back badly, but unless you insanely overpaid, he was going to take a starter's job elsewhere.

Lewis? Our best SS, but that wasn't saying much. farged up too many times. We can do better in the draft.

Stallworth: I wanted him back more than anyone and am still a little annoyed about it. I'm going to give Curtis a chance to prove himself though. Was a really good WR for the Rams when he stepped in for Bruce and played really well in 2 big playoff games. Also he has a lot better hands than Stallworth, while not quite as fast. We'll see how he fits. I love Donte, but he did drop some balls last year and kill some drives for this team. Also there is the hammy issues, which IMO while there are overblown.

Garcia: Wanted him back too, but let's be real here. He wanted the money and was playing the Eagles and the market. He got what he wanted, which was 5 mil per year and a chance to start in Tampa.


Calling this the most amazing offseason ever is way too extreme, but the Eagles did better themselves this offseason. I still think they have quite a bit to go to catch the top tier AFC teams, but right now they are as good as anyone in the NFC. With a solid draft, they should be favorites in the NFC, but the key obviously is McNabb's health... which leads right into my biggest worry for the Eagles. It has been said numerous times, but the question marks worry me.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 29, 2007, 04:50:01 PM
I agree with most, if not all, of King Cole's post, so I think I'm going to take my own advice from the previous post.


I'll see you all in hell.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on March 29, 2007, 07:29:41 PM
I wasn't home to see it myself, but apparently John Clark said Emmons wants to come back...  :-\

The Eagles told him they'll decide after the draft...
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on March 29, 2007, 08:05:14 PM
Well, I guess Andy Reid must be the dumbest motherfarger on Earth because he clearly believes the Eagles have a shot at the Super Bowl:

QuotePHOENIX - Acknowledging that the Eagles might not be finished making free-agent deals and obviously are not sure what players they will acquire in next month's draft, Andy Reid said yesterday that he believed he would have a Super Bowl contender next season.

"I think it's important how we come together and how the chemistry develops and all of that," Reid said on the final day of the NFL meetings. "But I think we have the personnel to do it. . . . If we take care of business, and everybody works hard and pulls together and does their thing, we have as good a shot as anybody."


He clearly should be fired for expressing any sort of confidence regarding this team.  Hell, experts everywhere on the internet are POSITIVE that the Eagles don't have a chance, so who is the head coach of the Eagles to say they do!?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 29, 2007, 08:17:09 PM
Quote from: BigEd76 on March 29, 2007, 07:29:41 PM
I wasn't home to see it myself, but apparently John Clark said Emmons wants to come back...  :-\

He's a shell of his former self, but I'd love to have him back in a reserve role on the cheap.

The problem is that the Emmons/Trotter/Spikes combo is not what we would call "nimble" overall.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Dillen on March 29, 2007, 08:23:06 PM
Quote from: FastFreddie on March 29, 2007, 08:17:09 PM
Quote from: BigEd76 on March 29, 2007, 07:29:41 PM
I wasn't home to see it myself, but apparently John Clark said Emmons wants to come back...  :-\

He's a shell of his former self, but I'd love to have him back in a reserve role on the cheap.

The problem is that the Emmons/Trotter/Spikes combo is not what we would call "nimble" overall.
Spikes should be left out of that sentence. Even being injured, he's pretty fast. However,Trotter and Emmons starting on the same defense is a disaster. The Eagles DEs are all faster than them, except maybe not Howard.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on March 29, 2007, 08:24:47 PM
Quote from: FastFreddie on March 29, 2007, 04:50:01 PM
I agree with most, if not all, of King Cole's post, so I think I'm going to take my own advice from the previous post.


I'll see you all in hell.

Holy shtein, me too.  As I was reading through it and realized that it was actually making sense, I kept scrolling back up to make sure that the author was indeed King Cole.

Quote from: FastFreddie on March 29, 2007, 08:17:09 PM
Quote from: BigEd76 on March 29, 2007, 07:29:41 PM
I wasn't home to see it myself, but apparently John Clark said Emmons wants to come back...  :-\

He's a shell of his former self, but I'd love to have him back in a reserve role on the cheap.

The problem is that the Emmons/Trotter/Spikes combo is not what we would call "nimble" overall.

Meh... I guess I'd be straight with it if he came on the cheap... if Emmons has anything left (and started)... maybe it could free up Spikes for the WIL where he can have more impact.

I'd rather take care of LB in the draft, but if not... I guess he works as abackup plan.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Dillen on March 29, 2007, 08:57:42 PM
I'd rather them just grab Patrick Willis in a trade up or Anthony Waters in the 3rd round or so. I dont want three senile-ass-motherfargers as the linebacking group.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on March 29, 2007, 09:20:12 PM
Hmmm...Emmons has declined pretty rapidly.

However, I would take him at SLB over Dhani though. So if they want to play Spikes at WIL then they need a strongside backer.

But I would prefer to see Gaither stay in there at WLB with Spikes on the other side.

And I want Patrick Willis too.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on March 29, 2007, 09:27:08 PM
Quote from: Jerome99RIP on March 29, 2007, 08:05:14 PM
Well, I guess Andy Reid must be the dumbest motherfarger on Earth because he clearly believes the Eagles have a shot at the Super Bowl:

QuotePHOENIX - Acknowledging that the Eagles might not be finished making free-agent deals and obviously are not sure what players they will acquire in next month's draft, Andy Reid said yesterday that he believed he would have a Super Bowl contender next season.

"I think it's important how we come together and how the chemistry develops and all of that," Reid said on the final day of the NFL meetings. "But I think we have the personnel to do it. . . . If we take care of business, and everybody works hard and pulls together and does their thing, we have as good a shot as anybody."


He clearly should be fired for expressing any sort of confidence regarding this team.  Hell, experts everywhere on the internet are POSITIVE that the Eagles don't have a chance, so who is the head coach of the Eagles to say they do!?

Would you like a tissue? Maybe you need a break from the internets mister sensative susan.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: General_Failure on March 29, 2007, 09:30:28 PM
Quote from: King Cole on March 29, 2007, 04:47:09 PM
Stallworth: I wanted him back more than anyone and am still a little annoyed about it. I'm going to give Curtis a chance to prove himself though. Was a really good WR for the Rams when he stepped in for Bruce and played really well in 2 big playoff games. Also he has a lot better hands than Stallworth, while not quite as fast. We'll see how he fits. I love Donte, but he did drop some balls last year and kill some drives for this team. Also there is the hammy issues, which IMO while there are overblown.

This is the only move that really matters here. Everybody in the world knew the rest of those guys were gone. Hell, most people knew that Stallworth was gone as well. Nevermind the fact that Stallworth couldn't break 40 receptions last year, the Eagles replaced a starting receiver with Slotty Magoo from Bumfarg, Idaho. This is not an upgrade, and it is not equal value. The worst position on offense got worse.

Benefit of the doubt, my ass. This is James Thrash again.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on March 29, 2007, 09:31:22 PM
James Thrash with a money part.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Dillen on March 29, 2007, 09:33:04 PM
Quote from: General_Failure on March 29, 2007, 09:30:28 PM
This is James Thrash again.
Forget all the reasoning you had. Wasn't Thrash half black-half white? This guy is all honkie. Downgrade.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on March 29, 2007, 09:33:25 PM
Quote from: General_Failure on March 29, 2007, 09:30:28 PM
Quote from: King Cole on March 29, 2007, 04:47:09 PM
Stallworth: I wanted him back more than anyone and am still a little annoyed about it. I'm going to give Curtis a chance to prove himself though. Was a really good WR for the Rams when he stepped in for Bruce and played really well in 2 big playoff games. Also he has a lot better hands than Stallworth, while not quite as fast. We'll see how he fits. I love Donte, but he did drop some balls last year and kill some drives for this team. Also there is the hammy issues, which IMO while there are overblown.

Slotty Magoo from Bumfarg, Idaho

:-D

It could be worse...they could have done nothing and went with a scintillating trio of Baskett/Avant/Lewis behind Brown.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on March 29, 2007, 09:50:28 PM
Curtis is not a star, but he is a better player than James Thrash. A lot better. I think there is a chance Curtis can be as good as Stallworth given the chance. Of course he'll have to prove it first, and right now Stallworth is the better player. Curtis is a good receiver though. Fast, good hands, and tough.

The receivers are the last thing to be worried about right now. Even without Stallworth, this offense put up big points. The questions of the receivers are the furthest thing from my mind. The defense has to play a lot better if this team has a shot to do anything. Bunkley, Spikes, Kearse, Gocong, Reagor, James, Trotter are all question marks right now.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Geowhizzer on March 29, 2007, 10:02:49 PM
Cole's back on the Kool-Aid again.

I'll watch the games.  Then I'll let you know what I think.

Can't say I've been overly excited about any of this offseason.  Then again, I'm not paying as much attention to it.  I'm getting my house ready for the baby, and training her brother to kill any boy that gets near her.  >:D
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: General_Failure on March 29, 2007, 11:10:04 PM
Why am I the only one that thinks having Brown as the best receiver on this team is a horrible, horrible idea? Is there some thrill of excitement that everyone else gets when RBs catches pass after pass in the flat for 6 yards?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Magical_Retard on March 29, 2007, 11:20:51 PM
Quote from: General_Failure on March 29, 2007, 11:10:04 PM
Why am I the only one that thinks having Brown as the best receiver on this team is a horrible, horrible idea? Is there some thrill of excitement that everyone else gets when RBs catches pass after pass in the flat for 6 yards?

ur not the only one. i think EVERYONE thinks having stallworth would have been much better than curtis. stallworth is proven.

but considering the WRs we have had in the past...i feel a lil better with curtis in than with just brown.

and as cole said....DEFENSE is the real worry.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: General_Failure on March 29, 2007, 11:24:14 PM
Instead of three #3 WRs, the team has four. That's really going to help the defense when they go three and out.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on March 30, 2007, 04:35:11 AM
You don't think this offense is going to put up points? The receivers aren't the world's best, but they are good enough. We have arguably the best offensive line in the NFL, a solid TE, a great RB, and McNabb... who's health is a question. If McNabb is ready to go, then this offense will be absolutely fine. If he isn't then it isn't a secret where this team is headed.

Stallworth is a more proven receiver than Curtis, but Stallworth isn't some star either. He was an outcast of a Saints team that didn't want him, and when he hit free agency, no teams ran out and offered him huge cash. Again, I'd rather have had Stallworth, but it isn't like we are replacing Chad Johnson with Curtis. Stallworth wasn't all that amazing. We'll see how Curtis does. He has already shown flashes when starting with the Rams. It isn't a huge strech that he can come in and be a good receiver.

and you really think Reggie Brown is a #3 receiver? He isn't a pro bowler, but I look at him as a very good #2.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Geowhizzer on March 30, 2007, 05:50:45 AM
Come on, you know we all can't wait to see that Holcomb to Curtis pass!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 30, 2007, 06:37:28 AM
Why am I the only one that thinks having Brown as the best receiver on this team is a horrible, horrible idea?

youre not...but for some reason normally intelligent people on the board are in line behind the possibly the dumbest football fan of all time

the wr's are good enough to go...IF everything goes right...10-6 in the division and then get ousted against better competition in the playoffs...but let westbrook go down or mcnabb not be ready or at 100% and then the wr's will be exposed for the brutally average crop that they are...this spread it around garbage dont work unless you have tom brady at qb....you need a number one wr...but for some reason many eagle fans have bought into reids smoke and mirror version of the west coast offense

the new thing to say is now "the offense is gonna get their points"...well yeah when you throw 150 times a game and have a good qb of course you will...but the goal here is not to score 23 pts a game its to win a superbowl

until he proves otherwise kevin curtis is greg lewis...im failry certain lewis would get numbers behind holt and bruce in a mike martz offense...now i wanna see curtis get numbers and make a difference in a spread it around andy reid offense
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Magical_Retard on March 30, 2007, 06:59:25 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on March 30, 2007, 06:37:28 AM
Why am I the only one that thinks having Brown as the best receiver on this team is a horrible, horrible idea?

youre not...but for some reason normally intelligent people on the board are in line behind the possibly the dumbest football fan of all time

the wr's are good enough to go...IF everything goes right...10-6 in the division and then get ousted against better competition in the playoffs...but let westbrook go down or mcnabb not be ready or at 100% and then the wr's will be exposed for the brutally average crop that they are...this spread it around garbage dont work unless you have tom brady at qb....you need a number one wr...but for some reason many eagle fans have bought into reids smoke and mirror version of the west coast offense

the new thing to say is now "the offense is gonna get their points"...well yeah when you throw 150 times a game and have a good qb of course you will...but the goal here is not to score 23 pts a game its to win a superbowl

until he proves otherwise kevin curtis is greg lewis...im failry certain lewis would get numbers behind holt and bruce in a mike martz offense...now i wanna see curtis get numbers and make a difference in a spread it around andy reid offense


nobody is buying into reids tricks....i think we all know our WR corps is not amazing. it isnt even great. maybe just good and even that is pushing it. but as a team i worry about the D a lot more. the average offense can be redeemed if we have a bad ass DEFENSE.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 30, 2007, 07:52:01 AM
i agree but they dont have even a very good d much less the 2000 ravens
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on March 30, 2007, 08:01:22 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on March 30, 2007, 06:37:28 AM
the new thing to say is now "the offense is gonna get their points"...well yeah when you throw 150 times a game and have a good qb of course you will...but the goal here is not to score 23 pts a game its to win a superbowl

This really is the long and the short of the problem right here.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on March 30, 2007, 08:24:06 AM
I'll throw this prediction out there: Curtis will have more catches this season than Stallworth had last season.

Of course, his YPC won't be as high and he'll probably play in every game too.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on March 30, 2007, 08:34:27 AM
I predict that 45 year old ladies will swoon every time he takes his helmet off.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MURP on March 30, 2007, 09:01:11 AM
Quote from: General_Failure on March 29, 2007, 11:10:04 PM
Why am I the only one that thinks having Brown as the best receiver on this team is a horrible, horrible idea?

I also think it is a bad idea, but I have just given up hope at obtaining a great WR for a long time. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on March 30, 2007, 10:17:39 AM
Quote from: BigEd76 on March 29, 2007, 07:29:41 PM
I wasn't home to see it myself, but apparently John Clark said Emmons wants to come back...  :-\


I'd rather keep bowtie than have Emmons back.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: phattymatty on March 30, 2007, 10:23:27 AM
since i've been a football fan, i've never seen someone  get so consistantly wide open as stallworth did last year.  over and over, there was no one within ten yards of him.  curtis won't do that.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on March 30, 2007, 10:26:37 AM
It's all about the system!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 30, 2007, 10:36:10 AM
I'd rather keep bowtie than have Emmons back

so would i...id also rather have ike back


since i've been a football fan, i've never seen someone  get so consistantly wide open as stallworth did last year.  over and over, there was no one within ten yards of him.  curtis won't do that.

pretty much...curtis was a holy shtein our wr's are atrocious and we need to quell the uprising amongst our fans lets get someone quick signing

people need not to confuse best person available at the time with excellent signing

the eagles play the game so well

they let the top notch players sign elsewhere...they get the fanbase in a frenzy by doing nothing for a couple weeks...then just when you think its the end of the world they sign a second rate guy like curtis...

the timing is brilliant in that people have already moved on and forgotten about stallworth leaving and instead switched their anger to the fact that the eagles havent done anything....so what the birds do then is sign someone...anyone....and people dont say "wait this is stallworths replacement??"...

they are instead "yes! finally they did something...hmmm kevin curtis? not a bad player nice signing"...then a little more time passes and before you know it you have lots of eagle fans back in the kool aid...even tho the big picture says going from curtis to stallworth is a minus for the team


Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 30, 2007, 10:52:53 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on March 30, 2007, 10:36:10 AM
pretty much...curtis was a holy shtein our wr's are atrocious and we need to quell the uprising amongst our fans lets get someone quick signing

people need not to confuse best person available at the time with excellent signing

the eagles play the game so well

they let the top notch players sign elsewhere...they get the fanbase in a frenzy by doing nothing for a couple weeks...then just when you think its the end of the world they sign a second rate guy like curtis...

the timing is brilliant in that people have already moved on and forgotten about stallworth leaving and instead switched their anger to the fact that the eagles havent done anything....so what the birds do then is sign someone...anyone....and people dont say "wait this is stallworths replacement??"...

they are instead "yes! finally they did something...hmmm kevin curtis? not a bad player nice signing"...then a little more time passes and before you know it you have lots of eagle fans back in the kool aid...even tho the big picture says going from curtis to stallworth is a minus for the team

Your theory would pull some weight if this FO ever gave a rat's ass about the fans whining.  It's obvious they always have targets in FA and if they fail, they don't really move to the next person at all... because there might not be value there.  I'm going to use a very fitting analogy here for why the Eagles signed Curtis instead of Stallworth:

Stallworth is like a European sports car.  Extremely impressive and high-performing when in good shape, but has to go into the shop for repairs more than you'd like.  Also, there's rumor of a recall that could have it in the shop for a whole year.

Curtis is like a certified-pre-owned, low-mileage, fully-loaded Honda Civic.  You know it will take you from A to B in relative comfort and has adequate speed... it's just not going to blow the panties off any fine bitches.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: mussa on March 30, 2007, 10:57:20 AM
whats the chances of us going after a receiver in the draft, within the first 3 rounds? I would be more than okay with that. priorities first though I'd like to see FS or SS, LB, RB(Bucks replacement) and WR.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 30, 2007, 10:58:07 AM
Your theory would pull some weight if this FO ever gave a rat's ass about the fans whining

they absolutely do care tho....from banners you should love jeff lurie because you wouldnt have a team without him to his wip tirades where he whines about the fans not liking the front office enough to luries yearly state of the union address telling all the fans how great his organization is....

they care and they care a lot
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on March 30, 2007, 10:59:52 AM
Quote from: mussa on March 30, 2007, 10:57:20 AM
whats the chances of us going after a receiver in the draft, within the first 3 rounds? I would be more than okay with that. priorities first though I'd like to see FS or SS, LB, RB(Bucks replacement) and WR.
Since they're so high on Avant and Baskett I doubt they'd spend a first day pick on a WR. I hope the first day is all defense with maybe a big back if a decent one is there.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 30, 2007, 11:05:05 AM
i hope the next three drafts are all defense
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 30, 2007, 11:12:12 AM
Quote from: mussa on March 30, 2007, 10:57:20 AM
whats the chances of us going after a receiver in the draft, within the first 3 rounds? I would be more than okay with that. priorities first though I'd like to see FS or SS, LB, RB(Bucks replacement) and WR.

I hope they don't draft one at all, let alone early... unless hell freezes over and someone drops way more than they should.

They currently have a lot of young and/or unproven WR's.  Kevin Curtis is the "old guy", and Reggie Brown and Baskett are probably the only other absolute givens on the roster.  Then, you have Avant, Lewis, Bethel Johnson, and Bloom fighting for 2 or 3 more spots.  I don't see a draft pick at WR having a good chance of improving the team this year or in the near future.

Quote from: ice grillin you on March 30, 2007, 10:58:07 AM
they care and they care a lot

Let me rephrase... they certainly haven't used fan support to decide anything for the roster.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 30, 2007, 11:18:07 AM
yeah i dont think they are gonna change their entire philosophy because of the fans..but their timing certainly is always on point PR wise

for example you would never see them let stallworth walk and then sign curtis the next day

it really shows some of the the fans ignorance more than anything the team is doing
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: phattymatty on March 30, 2007, 11:18:19 AM
i guess this is the year we finally let greg lewis go.  about friggin time.  also, there's no chance both bethel johnson and bloom make the roster is there?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 30, 2007, 11:19:53 AM
i think they want bloom on punts and bethel on kick offs...so i would say theres def a chance both stick...it also wouldnt surprise me one bit to see bloom cut
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyandBCEagles on March 30, 2007, 11:21:07 AM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on March 30, 2007, 10:59:52 AM
Quote from: mussa on March 30, 2007, 10:57:20 AM
whats the chances of us going after a receiver in the draft, within the first 3 rounds? I would be more than okay with that. priorities first though I'd like to see FS or SS, LB, RB(Bucks replacement) and WR.
Since they're so high on Avant and Baskett I doubt they'd spend a first day pick on a WR. I hope the first day is all defense with maybe a big back if a decent one is there.

Agree.  The idea of getting Griffin in the 1st, Leonard in the 2nd, Waters or Siler in the 3rd gives me football wood.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on March 30, 2007, 11:21:21 AM
I think there's a good chance that both Bloom and Johnson make the team. One is a kick returner one is a model/skier. Two completely different positions.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on March 30, 2007, 11:22:12 AM
Greg is staying, I would bet. They love him. Although I don't like him he is good in the role they had him in last year - 4th WR and a gunner on STs. Play him like 2005 and he's trash.

I wold bet that Bloom has a better shot to stick than Johnson.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on March 30, 2007, 11:38:42 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on March 30, 2007, 11:05:05 AM
i hope the next three drafts are all defense
That would be great if Andy didn't have to fulfill his Mormon and O-line draft quota.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on March 30, 2007, 11:49:32 AM
Quote from: rjs246 on March 30, 2007, 11:21:21 AM
I think there's a good chance that both Bloom and Johnson make the team. One is a kick returner one is a model/skier. Two completely different positions.

laughing
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 30, 2007, 11:52:13 AM
Quote from: rjs246 on March 30, 2007, 11:21:21 AM
I think there's a good chance that both Bloom and Johnson make the team. One is a kick returner one is a model/skier. Two completely different positions.

C-.

Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on March 30, 2007, 11:22:12 AM
I wold bet that Bloom has a better shot to stick than Johnson.

Naturally.  He's white.

Quote from: SD_Eagle on March 30, 2007, 11:38:42 AM
That would be great if Andy didn't have to fulfill his Mormon and O-line draft quota.

That's why the Scott Young pick was so genius.  Two birds, one stone.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on March 30, 2007, 11:53:16 AM
Quote from: FastFreddie on March 30, 2007, 11:52:13 AM
Two birds, one stone.

That hurt my head a little...
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on March 30, 2007, 11:53:32 AM
Quote from: Diomedes on March 30, 2007, 11:49:32 AM
Quote from: rjs246 on March 30, 2007, 11:21:21 AM
I think there's a good chance that both Bloom and Johnson make the team. One is a kick returner one is a model/skier. Two completely different positions.

laughing

Someone's feeling generous today. You must have last-day-at-work giddiness.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Wingspan on March 30, 2007, 12:01:06 PM
Bloom is safe for at least this year. He actually just bought a home in the King of Prussia area. (One of my neighbors was the real estate agent for the sellers of his new house).

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: phattymatty on March 30, 2007, 12:10:32 PM
bloom, you're cut.  oh you just bought a house?  ok, you can stay.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 30, 2007, 12:14:14 PM
Quote from: phattymatty on March 30, 2007, 12:10:32 PM
bloom, you're cut.  oh you just bought a house?  ok, you can stay.

Haha.  Exactly.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Wingspan on March 30, 2007, 12:18:06 PM
My point being that I don't think he would have done it had he not had some security from the coaches that he is going to stick around. But you knew that.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on March 30, 2007, 12:22:30 PM
Bloom made more money from skiing and endorsements than he'll ever make in the NFL.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Wingspan on March 30, 2007, 12:23:47 PM
Quote from: Jerome99RIP on March 30, 2007, 12:22:30 PM
Bloom made more money from skiing and endorsements than he'll ever make in the NFL



... and that's beautiful.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on March 30, 2007, 12:29:23 PM
Did McNabb saying anything remotely interesting in his ESPN chat yesterday?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 30, 2007, 12:30:20 PM
he ripped eagles fans again...nothing new
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on March 30, 2007, 12:33:49 PM
I can post the transcript if you want (and if GF doesn't mind).

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhanInDC on March 30, 2007, 12:35:10 PM
Quote from: Wingspan on March 30, 2007, 12:01:06 PM
Bloom is safe for at least this year. He actually just bought a home in the King of Prussia area. (One of my neighbors was the real estate agent for the sellers of his new house).

From PE.com:
Quote
Eagles Spring Into Full Bloom
April 30, 2006
By SHANE EVANS

Defensive tackle. Offensive tackle. Linebacker. Guard. Wide receiver. Olympic skier?
That's right, Eagles fans. That's the order of the Eagles' first six draft picks and one of the newest Eagles participated in the 2006 Winter Olympics in Torino, Italy.

Jeremy Bloom, the freestyle skiing world champion and former University of Colorado kick return specialist is coming to Philly after being selected with the 147th overall selection in the fifth round.

"I really had no idea and I went into this thing thinking I would not get drafted and do it through free agency," said Bloom during his conference call. "I tried to lower the expectations when things are out of my control like they were today. All I can do now is show up in Philadelphia, bring my work ethic and work as hard as I can."

Bloom's spot on the roster will likely be at the returner position. During his two years at Colorado, he had five plays of over 75 yards (two receptions, two punt returns and one kick return) and the Eagles need someone to provide them with good starting field position, which Bloom definitely feels he is capable of.

"My coach in college thought that the most important thing in the return game is making one guy miss," said Bloom. "I set the expectation for myself a little higher and tried to make more than one guy miss. In the kickoff return game, it's really important to put your offense in a good position, past the 20. The further you get past the 20, the higher the likelihood your offense can score. I just try to do everything in my power to do that."

Skeptics said that it would be hard for Bloom to kick start his football career after a two-year layoff. NCAA rules forbid an athlete to receive endorsement money, and after Bloom lost his lawsuit against the NCAA his football career at Colorado came to an end. Bloom continued to ski and began training for the Olympics. Bloom never regretted the decision to favor skiing for those two years, even though he was upset that he couldn't continue with football.

"No, I wouldn't trade the last two years for being a first-round draft pick," said Bloom. "The disappointing thing came when the NCAA would not allow me to do both. They showed me the door and caused me to miss my junior and senior season, but I think it is a tremendous blessing to be drafted into the fifth round and more importantly than the fifth round, to a team that I think is a perfect fit for me."

Skiing is in the past now for Bloom as he is ready to continue his football career with the Philadelphia Eagles, a team that he couldn't be happier to be drafted by.

"I have family in Villanova and my father was raised in Philadelphia," said Bloom. "I have been to Philadelphia several times. I used to go to summer camp in the Poconos. So, I am very familiar with the area. Things happen for a reason and they always have. I am just pinching myself that I am coming to Philadelphia."

That could've been the reasoning for the house...
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 30, 2007, 12:37:31 PM
that or his guaranteed roster spot

i wonder if bloom is even required to go to lehigh this year
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on March 30, 2007, 12:39:36 PM
Quote from: Jerome99RIP on March 30, 2007, 12:33:49 PM
I can post the transcript if you want (and if GF doesn't mind).

Sure.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on March 30, 2007, 12:41:44 PM
Deleted at rjs's request because it made his wittle head hurt like teh dickens.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 30, 2007, 12:48:07 PM
QuoteKiran (philly,pa): whats your favorite throw to make--what route?

SportsNation Donovan McNabb: The deep ball.

No shtein.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: QB Eagles on March 30, 2007, 12:49:02 PM
Especially on 3rd and 1.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: phattymatty on March 30, 2007, 12:49:53 PM
Quote from: Jerome99RIP on March 30, 2007, 12:41:44 PM
Dave Spadaro, Philadelphia: Donovan, if you weren't a football player what do you think you would be doing?

SportsNation Donovan McNabb: I would be sports broadcasting.

ha

what a boring interview.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 30, 2007, 12:50:09 PM
Mike (Manassas, VA): Donovan, Do you think you will be less inclined to run now after your injury or will you play the same way?

SportsNation Donovan McNabb: I'm rushing for 1,000 yards next year. I'm going to break Mike Vick's record next year. No, I'm not running at all. I'm just playing.



he so funny
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on March 30, 2007, 12:55:01 PM
Nevermind. Please delete that post. I'm sorry I asked. Make it go away.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: phillywin2k5 on March 30, 2007, 02:10:52 PM
Quote from: FastFreddie on March 30, 2007, 11:12:12 AM
Quote from: mussa on March 30, 2007, 10:57:20 AM
whats the chances of us going after a receiver in the draft, within the first 3 rounds? I would be more than okay with that. priorities first though I'd like to see FS or SS, LB, RB(Bucks replacement) and WR.

I hope they don't draft one at all, let alone early... unless hell freezes over and someone drops way more than they should.

They currently have a lot of young and/or unproven WR's.  Kevin Curtis is the "old guy", and Reggie Brown and Baskett are probably the only other absolute givens on the roster.  Then, you have Avant, Lewis, Bethel Johnson, and Bloom fighting for 2 or 3 more spots.  I don't see a draft pick at WR having a good chance of improving the team this year or in the near future.

Quote from: ice grillin you on March 30, 2007, 10:58:07 AM
they care and they care a lot

Let me rephrase... they certainly haven't used fan support to decide anything for the roster.

i think Avant is going to be a player! he just has that attitude that he wants to be the best and he goes out and plays every down
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhanInDC on March 30, 2007, 02:25:14 PM
Quote from: phillywin2k5 on March 30, 2007, 02:10:52 PM
i think Avant is going to be a player! he just has that attitude that he wants to be the best and he goes out and plays every down

Except when he was sitting on the bench....which as it turns out, was 98% of the time.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 30, 2007, 02:28:55 PM
ha...for real

still trying to figure out where the love for avant comes from

at least baskett made some plays last year

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 30, 2007, 02:31:06 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on March 30, 2007, 02:28:55 PM
still trying to figure out where the love for avant comes from

college
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on March 30, 2007, 02:33:07 PM
Sarcasm detectors are on the fritz today?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Magical_Retard on March 30, 2007, 02:47:25 PM
There is love for Avant?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on March 30, 2007, 02:47:56 PM
The wide receivers are fine.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 30, 2007, 02:53:49 PM
There is love for Avant?

people had him penciled in as the #3 wr before curtis was signed and lots of them were fine with it...i guess it comes from heckert and andy always big upping him in interviews...for whatever reason there is a large segment of people out there who think a player is good for no other reason than that he was drafted by the eagles
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 30, 2007, 04:00:28 PM
Quote from: rjs246 on March 30, 2007, 02:47:56 PM
The wide receivers are fine.

I agree.  Not spectacular.  Not awful.  Fine.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on March 30, 2007, 04:01:47 PM
They're gonna get out there and work hard and compete.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 30, 2007, 04:03:15 PM
Quote from: rjs246 on March 30, 2007, 04:01:47 PM
They're gonna get out there and work hard and compete.

But the burning question is... Are they going to get in the mix there?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on March 30, 2007, 04:03:58 PM
If Andy puts them in a position to make plays, sure.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 30, 2007, 04:06:15 PM
I think he's going to try to do a better job of that.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on March 30, 2007, 04:28:52 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on March 30, 2007, 10:36:10 AM
I'd rather keep bowtie than have Emmons back

so would i...id also rather have ike back


since i've been a football fan, i've never seen someone  get so consistantly wide open as stallworth did last year.  over and over, there was no one within ten yards of him.  curtis won't do that.

pretty much...curtis was a holy shtein our wr's are atrocious and we need to quell the uprising amongst our fans lets get someone quick signing

people need not to confuse best person available at the time with excellent signing

the eagles play the game so well

they let the top notch players sign elsewhere...they get the fanbase in a frenzy by doing nothing for a couple weeks...then just when you think its the end of the world they sign a second rate guy like curtis...

the timing is brilliant in that people have already moved on and forgotten about stallworth leaving and instead switched their anger to the fact that the eagles havent done anything....so what the birds do then is sign someone...anyone....and people dont say "wait this is stallworths replacement??"...

they are instead "yes! finally they did something...hmmm kevin curtis? not a bad player nice signing"...then a little more time passes and before you know it you have lots of eagle fans back in the kool aid...even tho the big picture says going from curtis to stallworth is a minus for the team




Ummm... they signed Curtis like 3 or 4 days after Stallworth. No one is going to say that Curtis is better than Stallworth, but IMO he is close. Have you ever seen the guy play or are you just ripping the signing for the sake of it. I'd rather have Stallworth, and am still a little annoyed that he isn't back, but we aren't losing Chad Johnson here. Donte Stallworth is NOT a stud #1 WR. He drops balls, he isn't durable.

This offense is not going to see a huge dropoff, if any, in the production this year as long as McNabb is healthy. That is another issue for another discussion though, because obviously for this team to do anything it is contingent upon McNabb being ready to play and play well.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on March 30, 2007, 04:31:03 PM
Statistical production is meaningless. I would be thrilled if this offense put up less yards and points but actually had ANY time of possession. Sadly, the head coach disagrees. He likes to play Madden with the offense.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Magical_Retard on March 30, 2007, 04:33:09 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on March 30, 2007, 02:53:49 PM
There is love for Avant?

people had him penciled in as the #3 wr before curtis was signed and lots of them were fine with it...i guess it comes from heckert and andy always big upping him in interviews...for whatever reason there is a large segment of people out there who think a player is good for no other reason than that he was drafted by the eagles

i dont think anyone was fine with it. show me who was fine with the eagles WRs being Brown, Baskett, and Avant. i think everyone on this board was upset with that lineup.

the eagles ofcourse would think they would be fine with that lineup since at times last season without stallworth the eagles were able to put up points, but that was with a healthy mcnabb playing at a amazing pace b4 getting hurt.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on March 30, 2007, 04:43:04 PM
Quote from: rjs246 on March 30, 2007, 04:31:03 PM
Statistical production is meaningless. I would be thrilled if this offense put up less yards and points but actually had ANY time of possession. Sadly, the head coach disagrees. He likes to play Madden with the offense.

If the Eagles commit to the run like they say, then this offense will be damn good. Still a big question that they do commit to it though. I'll have to see it to believe it. But maybe McNabb coming off his career's worst injury is finally that wakeup call.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhanInDC on March 30, 2007, 06:11:06 PM
Quote from: King Cole on March 30, 2007, 04:35:11 AM
Stallworth is a more proven receiver than Curtis, but Stallworth isn't some star either. He was an outcast of a Saints team that didn't want him, and when he hit free agency, no teams ran out and offered him huge cash. Again, I'd rather have had Stallworth, but it isn't like we are replacing Chad Johnson with Curtis. Stallworth wasn't all that amazing. We'll see how Curtis does. He has already shown flashes when starting with the Rams. It isn't a huge strech that he can come in and be a good receiver.

and you really think Reggie Brown is a #3 receiver? He isn't a pro bowler, but I look at him as a very good #2.

Quote from: King Cole on March 30, 2007, 04:28:52 PM
Ummm... they signed Curtis like 3 or 4 days after Stallworth. No one is going to say that Curtis is better than Stallworth, but IMO he is close. Have you ever seen the guy play or are you just ripping the signing for the sake of it. I'd rather have Stallworth, and am still a little annoyed that he isn't back, but we aren't losing Chad Johnson here. Donte Stallworth is NOT a stud #1 WR. He drops balls, he isn't durable.

This offense is not going to see a huge dropoff, if any, in the production this year as long as McNabb is healthy. That is another issue for another discussion though, because obviously for this team to do anything it is contingent upon McNabb being ready to play and play well.

Repeating the same points over and over again helps make an argument stronger. Fo sho.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on March 30, 2007, 06:47:00 PM
Sifting through one's posts for miniscule/nitpicky things is a clear sign of higher intelligence. Word.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on March 30, 2007, 07:04:06 PM
King Cole, lets be honest here, you don't have to 'sift through' your posts to find idiocy. And the nonsense in them is hardly miniscule.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on March 30, 2007, 07:19:25 PM
To you, the smoking ban is idiocy. That is all that needs to be said about you and your opinion towards idiocy.  :-D
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on March 30, 2007, 08:28:57 PM
Repeating the same points over and over again helps make an argument stronger. Fo sho.

again...one of the dumber human beings that has ever lived...makes munson look like william sidis
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on March 30, 2007, 08:47:15 PM
Does Holcomb getting #10 mean that Detmer isn't coming back?  :'(
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on March 30, 2007, 09:45:31 PM
Quote from: King Cole on March 30, 2007, 07:19:25 PM
To you, the smoking ban is idiocy. That is all that needs to be said about you and your opinion towards idiocy.  :-D

It's unsurprising that you wouldn't be able to see the intellectual value of true freedom.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on March 30, 2007, 11:49:18 PM
And he used a smilie.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on April 01, 2007, 01:50:49 PM
QuotePOSTED 7:15 a.m. EDT, April 1, 2007

McNABB TO RETIRE?

Eagles quarterback Donovan McNabb is contemplating retirement, a source close to McNabb tells us.

Per the source, McNabb has grown weary of rehabbing the ACL that he tore last season, and he has decided that he has had enough.

"He always gets hurt," said the source.  "And he thinks that it's just going to happen again.  So why bother spending all the time and effort getting healthy?"

McNabb has missed extensive time over the past several years with a broken ankle, a hernia, and the ACL tear.

The primary in-house options for the Eagles to replace him would be A.J. Feeley and Kelly Holcomb.  Holcomb was acquired a few days ago in a trade with the Bills.  They also could bring in a proven veteran, such as Jeff George.

April 1 is funney
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on April 01, 2007, 02:23:37 PM
QuoteThey also could bring in a proven veteran, such as Jeff George.

Hahahaa.  Nice.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: shorebird on April 02, 2007, 06:16:32 AM
Quote from: FastFreddie on April 01, 2007, 02:23:37 PM
QuoteThey also could bring in a proven veteran, such as Jeff George.

Hahahaa.  Nice.

Jeff George=  :poison

Quote"He always gets hurt," said the source.  "And he thinks that it's just going to happen again.  So why bother spending all the time and effort getting healthy?"

$$$




Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on April 02, 2007, 08:22:52 AM
under-the-radar Eagles... courtesy of Spads (http://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/news/newsDetail.jsp?id=66850)

QuoteBILL SAMPY, WR

I look at these Eagles wide receivers and I think the position is virtually filled. Kevin Curtis is going to make it. Same with Reggie Brown and Greg Lewis and Jason Avant and Baskett. Am I right? Or am I guilty of overlooking too many factors, or maybe overrating the talent?

Could be.

I know that the Eagles think a lot of Sampy and I know that he has been in the system for a year plus now and I know that he is in the off-season conditioning program and that he is going to push for a roster spot. He will offer competition. It may look like a long shot right now. I agree there. But Sampy has a little something in his game, a quickness, I think, and I want to see more from him in the spring and summer.

Bang! Bang!Bang! Bang!Bang! Bang!Bang! Bang!Bang! Bang!Bang! Bang!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: General_Failure on April 02, 2007, 10:03:41 AM
Get your Sampy jerseys now!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on April 02, 2007, 10:04:20 AM
...as if we all don't already have them.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on April 02, 2007, 09:40:10 PM
Mike Doss' name is coming back up.  Apparently, he's scheduled to visit this Wednesday.

link (http://boards.philadelphiaeagles.com/index.php?showtopic=430078&st=15)

(http://i178.photobucket.com/albums/w248/uzair3_21/DSC00987.jpg)

(http://i178.photobucket.com/albums/w248/uzair3_21/DSC00986-1.jpg)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on April 02, 2007, 09:41:19 PM
link?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: QB Eagles on April 02, 2007, 09:44:34 PM
I guess this offseason has caused Reid to soften up on people convicted of weapons charges.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on April 02, 2007, 09:46:06 PM
Quote from: Diomedes on April 02, 2007, 09:41:19 PM
link?

It's only funny when a link isn't posted.  Or when someone labels the link with an excessively long title. 

Quote from: EagleFeva on April 02, 2007, 09:40:10 PM
Mike Doss' name is coming back up.  Apparently, he's scheduled to visit this Wednesday.

link (http://boards.philadelphiaeagles.com/index.php?showtopic=430078&st=15)

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on April 02, 2007, 09:47:56 PM
Hey Feva.....are you watching an old Eagles game or something? 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: QB Eagles on April 02, 2007, 09:52:13 PM
Hey Sarge... My guess is that Dio saw the link just fine, but doesn't fancy himself the kind of guy who would lower himself into obtaining a TATE account.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on April 02, 2007, 10:02:27 PM
Do you have to have an account now to read the boards?  It's been so long since I've last been over there that I don't remember if I was required to log in or not. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: QB Eagles on April 02, 2007, 10:35:32 PM
Yeah, it requires a login even just to read. Only reason I have an account over there.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on April 02, 2007, 11:21:53 PM
Doss on a 1 year $1 million prove his worth deal wouldn't be too bad. Definitely would feel more comfortable about our DB depth.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on April 03, 2007, 12:16:19 AM
Agreed. Bring him in.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on April 03, 2007, 01:21:17 AM
Quote from: Sgt PSN on April 02, 2007, 09:47:56 PM
Hey Feva.....are you watching an old Eagles game or something? 

Nah... those aren't my pictures.  I noticed Duce puttin in work though too.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on April 03, 2007, 02:48:31 AM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on April 02, 2007, 11:21:53 PM
Doss on a 1 year $1 million prove his worth deal wouldn't be too bad. Definitely would feel more comfortable about our DB depth.

If he is cheap with a 1 year deal then I like this move. Anything else I really don't care either way. The upside is he is 26, will be cheap, and isn't Considine. The downside is he is always hurt and wasn't all that great when he played. I've seen him get burnt quite a few times over the years.

Maybe Montae Reagor convinces him to come here. This would be like the 3rd player we stole from the Vikings in the last 2 offseasons if he signs here. Childress...  :-D
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhanInDC on April 03, 2007, 09:00:04 AM
Blurb on it on KFFL:
Quote
NFL | Doss changes agents
Mon, 2 Apr 2007 20:04:20 -0700

Kevin Seifert, of the Star Tribune, reports free agent S Mike Doss (Colts) has switched agents to Drew Rosenhaus.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eagles | Doss will meet with team again this week
Mon, 2 Apr 2007 20:03:33 -0700

Kevin Seifert, of the Star Tribune, reports free agent S Mike Doss (Colts) will visit with the Philadelphia Eagles again later this week.


Rosenhaus is putting in work this offseason....
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on April 03, 2007, 11:37:19 AM
if they sign Doss, that gives them 4 safeties, i think it would all but eliminate them from taking a safety with their first pick, if that's the case, i don't want Doss
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on April 03, 2007, 11:51:05 AM
Quote from: SunMo on April 03, 2007, 11:37:19 AM
if they sign Doss, that gives them 4 safeties, i think it would all but eliminate them from taking a safety with their first pick, if that's the case, i don't want Doss
They'll just trade Considine for a first rounder and trade up to get Landry
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on April 03, 2007, 11:52:27 AM
Quote from: SunMo on April 03, 2007, 11:37:19 AM
if they sign Doss, that gives them 4 safeties, i think it would all but eliminate them from taking a safety with their first pick, if that's the case, i don't want Doss

Hardly.  It's not as if they have any depth at corner this year, and they usually keep 9 DB's.  Mikell plays "corner" in certain packages, as does Dawkins.  They could very well keep just the 4 CB's (Lito, Sheldon, Will James, and Joselio) and 5 safeties.

That said... I don't really care if they sign Doss or not.  If they think he's fully back from injury and can help the team on the cheap, fine.  He's a liability in coverage, though, so he's more of a situational player.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on April 03, 2007, 12:15:44 PM
He's Michael Lewis, cheaper.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on April 03, 2007, 03:09:15 PM
Quote from: SunMo on April 03, 2007, 11:37:19 AM
if they sign Doss, that gives them 4 safeties, i think it would all but eliminate them from taking a safety with their first pick, if that's the case, i don't want Doss

The more you look at the draft, they probably weren't going to anyway. We already have our cover safety in considine, we just need our run support safety. Doss could be fine in that regard. All the first round safeties that will be there for the Eagles are all free safeties mainly. The Eagles probably see this and figure to go corner in the first round. Unless Willis or a stud DE falls. Would I be ok with Meriweather? Absolutely. I'm just guessing the Eagles strategy here. I think they really like Considine.

Right now I either want Moss or Revis. The more I watch of Revis the more I love him. I think he is going to be the best corner out of this draft class.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Dillen on April 03, 2007, 03:27:50 PM
Jarvis Moss would make me pissed off. He isn't going to be a good DE. He's a 1st round 3-4 OLB, and a 2nd-3rd round DE.




Supposedly Considine is up to 220 pounds. Spadaro said it on Eagles Live.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on April 03, 2007, 03:30:15 PM
Did spew go into details about his abs?   :-\

Seriously, if he's 220 thats pretty impressive.  Now if he can hit like he's 240 then im feeling better about him
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on April 03, 2007, 03:46:45 PM
Quote from: Dillen on April 03, 2007, 03:27:50 PM
Jarvis Moss would make me pissed off. He isn't going to be a good DE. He's a 1st round 3-4 OLB, and a 2nd-3rd round DE.




Supposedly Considine is up to 220 pounds. Spadaro said it on Eagles Live.

I don't think he'll be a pro bowler, but he'd be a good guy in the rotation. I like Carriker a lot, but he is more of a 3-4 guy. I think if the Eagles really wanted him to and he fell, he could be in the 4-3 though.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhanInDC on April 03, 2007, 04:08:53 PM
Just a thought, but I am pretty sure you wouldn't want your first round pick to be a "good guy in the rotation".

There isn't a chance in hell Carriker is there at 26.

Quotebut he is more of a 3-4 guy

Quotehe could be in the 4-3 though.


.....right.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on April 03, 2007, 04:15:10 PM
if Sean Considine is the starting safety next year, the defense will rank in the bottom 10 in the league.  i don't care how much he weighs
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on April 03, 2007, 04:19:12 PM
Quote from: PPinDC on April 03, 2007, 04:08:53 PM
Just a thought, but I am pretty sure you wouldn't want your first round pick to be a "good guy in the rotation".

There isn't a chance in hell Carriker is there at 26.

Quotebut he is more of a 3-4 guy

Quotehe could be in the 4-3 though.


.....right.


When you rotate as much as JJ does, there is nothing wrong with being a rotational guy. When Kearse is healthy that is exactly what Trent Cole is. Also Moss would be insurance if Darren Howard sucks and can't produce.

and you are an idiot. Just because someone is best suited for a 3-4 doesn't mean they can't play in the 4-3.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on April 03, 2007, 04:21:26 PM
Trent Cole was a 4th rounder. Not a first rounder. Dipshtein.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on April 03, 2007, 04:21:47 PM
Quote from: SunMo on April 03, 2007, 04:15:10 PM
if Sean Considine is the starting safety next year, the defense will rank in the bottom 10 in the league.  i don't care how much he weighs

Sean Considine wasn't the guy that broke our defense last season. Go back to the playoff game against the Saints. How much of the run defense woes were the fault of Sean Considine? Very little. If the front 7 plays well then the defense won't be bottom 10. I don't care what Considine does.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on April 03, 2007, 04:23:13 PM
Quote from: rjs246 on April 03, 2007, 04:21:26 PM
Trent Cole was a 4th rounder. Not a first rounder. Dipshtein.

No, he was a 5th rounder, but he is still our best pass rusher. Is he not? I thought the whole point of the draft was to find good football players. Moss is a good football player, and will help this team.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on April 03, 2007, 04:26:37 PM
Even more to my point. He's a good pass-rusher, simply because he's used in a rotation. First rounders should be contributing on more than 45 snaps a game.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on April 03, 2007, 04:29:17 PM
If teams could do over the 2005 draft, then Trent Cole would be a late first rounder to mid 2nd rounder. With Darren Howard sucking last year and being old, and Kearse coming off an injury and getting older, Moss would be a very good pick. He isn't going to be a starter his rookie year, but once he develops more he will break out of that rotational guy mold that he'd  be as a rookie and become a starter down the line.

Assuming we sign Doss, I don't see many players that will be there at 26 who will come in and be major starters in their rookie year. So either way, I think who we draft will be used in some type of limited role.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Dillen on April 03, 2007, 04:40:59 PM
Quote from: King Cole on April 03, 2007, 03:46:45 PM
I don't think he'll be a pro bowler, but he'd be a good guy in the rotation. I like Carriker a lot, but he is more of a 3-4 guy. I think if the Eagles really wanted him to and he fell, he could be in the 4-3 though.
Moss is a waste of a pick if you intend on using him "in the rotation." You want a guy who is going to start. Period. I wouldnt be surprised if this is the last year that bother Kearse and Howard are on the team. It's okay if Cole wasnt a projected starter (although he's probably already locked up a future spot as a starter after what he's done) because he was a 5th rounder. "A good rotation guy" doesnt work when there arent guys to rotate.

Carriker is going to be a stud in any defense. He could be a dominant DE in a 3-4 or 4-3. There is no chance in hell he's there at 26, and it would not surprise me at all if they traded up for him.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on April 03, 2007, 04:52:32 PM
Quote from: Dillen on April 03, 2007, 04:40:59 PM
Quote from: King Cole on April 03, 2007, 03:46:45 PM
I don't think he'll be a pro bowler, but he'd be a good guy in the rotation. I like Carriker a lot, but he is more of a 3-4 guy. I think if the Eagles really wanted him to and he fell, he could be in the 4-3 though.
Moss is a waste of a pick if you intend on using him "in the rotation." You want a guy who is going to start. Period. I wouldnt be surprised if this is the last year that bother Kearse and Howard are on the team. It's okay if Cole wasnt a projected starter (although he's probably already locked up a future spot as a starter after what he's done) because he was a 5th rounder. "A good rotation guy" doesnt work when there arent guys to rotate.

Carriker is going to be a stud in any defense. He could be a dominant DE in a 3-4 or 4-3. There is no chance in hell he's there at 26, and it would not surprise me at all if they traded up for him.

Can you see anyone being there at 26 though who will be a starter besides at the safety spot? Any corner we got would be a nickel, any LB we could get wouldn't start, any DT we got wouldn't start. I doubt we pick offense in the first round, but even so, I don't see anyone we could pick who would get the big-time starter minutes there either.

We are deeper at d-line than a lot of other spots, so Moss might get less time, but the depth we have is really a question mark with Kearse and Howard.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: mussa on April 03, 2007, 05:08:49 PM
get the gun, get the gun....shoot, shoot, shoot...
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhanInDC on April 03, 2007, 06:13:14 PM
Quote from: King Cole on April 03, 2007, 04:19:12 PM
and you are an idiot. Just because someone is best suited for a 3-4 doesn't mean they can't play in the 4-3.

I'm an idiot? Am I the one posting here like I am some kind of seasoned NFL scout? Do you have any more of a clue who is going to be good, great, and terrible than anyone else? No more than I, or anyone else who posts here. You're not an idiot, you are a pompous ass.

Evidence:
Quote from: King Cole on April 03, 2007, 03:46:45 PM
I don't think he'll be a pro bowler, but he'd be a good guy in the rotation. I like Carriker a lot, but he is more of a 3-4 guy. I think if the Eagles really wanted him to and he fell, he could be in the 4-3 though.
You said the Eagles should use their first pick on a "good guy" in the defensive line rotation. Exellent expectations for a first rounder. That's right in line with every NFL teams expectations of a first round selection: "He'll be a good situational player." Douche.

Then, when you see you're wrong, you come back with this:
Quote from: King Cole on April 03, 2007, 04:29:17 PM
If teams could do over the 2005 draft, then Trent Cole would be a late first rounder to mid 2nd rounder. With Darren Howard sucking last year and being old, and Kearse coming off an injury and getting older, Moss would be a very good pick. He isn't going to be a starter his rookie year, but once he develops more he will break out of that rotational guy mold that he'd  be as a rookie and become a starter down the line.
So now he's goes from being a "good guy" in the rotation to breaking out of the mold?

In the same post:
Quote from: King Cole on April 03, 2007, 04:29:17 PM
Assuming we sign Doss, I don't see many players that will be there at 26 who will come in and be major starters in their rookie year. So either way, I think who we draft will be used in some type of limited role.
Nobody there to be a starter at 26? Let's just go by a lot of mocks: Michael Griffin, Lawrence Timmons, Reggie Nelson, Darelle Revis, Aaron Ross, Chris Houston, just to name a few. Oh and what farg is a major starter?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on April 03, 2007, 06:16:03 PM
Ignore. Function.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on April 03, 2007, 07:36:50 PM
Quote from: PPinDC on April 03, 2007, 06:13:14 PM
Quote from: King Cole on April 03, 2007, 04:19:12 PM
and you are an idiot. Just because someone is best suited for a 3-4 doesn't mean they can't play in the 4-3.

I'm an idiot? Am I the one posting here like I am some kind of seasoned NFL scout? Do you have any more of a clue who is going to be good, great, and terrible than anyone else? No more than I, or anyone else who posts here. You're not an idiot, you are a pompous ass.

:-D Pompous ass? You are the epitome of pompous. Listen to yourself, you sound like a bumbling moron. All I am giving is my opinions on who I like on the draft... nothing more. It is called a discussion. If you had an IQ of more than 30, you might understand that. Too bad your head is so far up your own ass and you couldn't figure that out if you wanted too. You really need to get over yourself man. Making assumptions on my character is ignorant and immature. You take things personally and attack every post I make. You really need to get a life.


QuoteYou said the Eagles should use their first pick on a "good guy" in the defensive line rotation. Exellent expectations for a first rounder. That's right in line with every NFL teams expectations of a first round selection: "He'll be a good situational player." Douche.

That is exactly what the Eagles are going to expect out of their pick this year. Hasn't Spadaro's last 5 articles on the draft told you enough? Talking about how the Eagles are pretty much set at every position as far as starters go, and you can bet that the Eagles agree with this. No player we get at 26 is going to be a full-time starter. Excluding safety because this whole debate started with the assumption that we sign Doss, and don't take safety in round 1. Of course this is all my opinion. Maybe I should say "in my opinion" after every post I make for your sake. So I don't come off as "pompous" and an "NFL scout"  :-D


QuoteThen, when you see you're wrong, you come back with this:

So now he's goes from being a "good guy" in the rotation to breaking out of the mold?

Breaking out of the mold... to become a starter. Which means take over for Kearse or Howard as a starting DE down the line. Meanwhile JJ will rotate him in. Doesn't take a genius to figure this stuff out. But with you I guess that is too much to ask.

QuoteNobody there to be a starter at 26? Let's just go by a lot of mocks: Michael Griffin, Lawrence Timmons, Reggie Nelson, Darelle Revis, Aaron Ross, Chris Houston, just to name a few. Oh and what farg is a major starter?

A major starter is a guy who is on the field on every down. A nickel corner is not on the field during every down. Therefore he is not a major starter. Do you really think Ross, Houston, Revis will start over Lito or Sheldon? Do you really think Timmons would start over Gaither or Spikes at WILL? As for your safeties, if you weren't so stupid you would've read that I said "Assuming we sign Doss and don't go safety in the first round."'

Now I expect some lame, immature insult or point singling-out proving you take message boards much too seriously as your personal attacks and constant critiquing has already shown here. After all, you started this beef. All I do is post here. If you don't agree with it then fine, but you've made it personal.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhanInDC on April 03, 2007, 10:04:16 PM
I think I'm going to take RJS's advice. Just about everyone on the board pretty much bypasses your asinine posts and rarely comment on them. I think I'll join the team.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on April 03, 2007, 10:42:08 PM
I figured you'd take the Hoyda way out, because that is what you are.

Have fun  :yay
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on April 04, 2007, 06:32:38 AM
Ignore. Function.

WINNER

i dont know why you guys continue to address that idiot
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Beermonkey on April 04, 2007, 09:12:23 AM
Now the bitching will go from "Mike Doss is an older Michael Lewis" to "OMFG!! The Eagles let the Vikings get Doss!WTF were they doing with their thumbs up their asses!!"


QuoteDOSS TO VIKINGS

Adam Schefter of NFL Network reports that free-agent safety Mike Doss signed a one-year, $1 million contract on Tuesday night with the Minnesota Vikings.

Doss likely will be penciled in as the starting strong safety in Minnesota's Tampa 2 defense, which is the same scheme that the Colts use.  He'll be paired with veteran Darren Sharper.

The former Ohio State standout is the fourth member of the Colts' defense to leave in the wake of the team's Super Bowl XLI victory.  Cornerback Nick Harper signed with the Titans and weakside linebacker Cato June joined the Bucs.  Defensive tackle Montae Reagor was released, and signed with the Eagles.

On offense, receiver Brandon Stokley was released.  He later signed with the Broncos.

Surprisingly, however, none of the Colts free agents were able to parlay their Super Bowl pedigrees into huge paydays.  In past years, teams were more likely to overpay members of the Super Bowl champion, largely for the "sizzle" factor that comes from saying, "We might never win a Super Bowl of our own, but at least one of our players recently has."
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on April 04, 2007, 09:16:19 AM
eagles must have literally been offering the vet minimum
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on April 04, 2007, 09:28:53 AM
good, didn't want him
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on April 04, 2007, 09:31:13 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on April 04, 2007, 09:16:19 AM
eagles must have literally been offering the vet minimum

You're assuming the Eagles genuinely had interest and were talking contract at all.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on April 04, 2007, 09:31:27 AM
Quote from: SunMo on April 04, 2007, 09:28:53 AMgood, didn't want him

Me either.  farging Michael Lewis clone.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: DH on April 04, 2007, 09:42:18 AM
KFFL is still reporting he is visiting today...
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on April 04, 2007, 09:44:38 AM
You're assuming the Eagles genuinely had interest and were talking contract at all.

two scheduled visits = geniune interest
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on April 04, 2007, 10:07:36 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on April 04, 2007, 09:44:38 AM
two scheduled visits = geniune interest

The first "scheduled visit" was a fathom of Doss and WIP's imagination as far as anyone knows, and if PFT is right about the Vikings, the 2nd one isn't going to happen one way or another either.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on April 04, 2007, 10:45:56 AM
But....but....he told Eagles fans that he watched "Invincible" and it would be a dream to play next to Dawkins!

How did a Rosenhaus client sign for 1 yr, $1M?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on April 04, 2007, 10:47:56 AM
it was Mike Doss
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on April 04, 2007, 10:53:03 AM
Ohio State is starting to prove they can't close the deal anyway.  I don't want any of that trash.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: mussa on April 04, 2007, 11:26:05 AM
sean considine is better than mike doss
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: phattymatty on April 04, 2007, 11:30:59 AM
liar
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on April 04, 2007, 11:33:18 AM
Taking the best attributes of Considine and Doss, you still would have a safety that gets burned in the passing game.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhanInDC on April 04, 2007, 11:40:21 AM
Quote from: King Cole on April 03, 2007, 10:42:08 PM
I figured you'd take the Hoyda way out, because that is what you are.

This is the last time I'm going to touch this, then I'm done.

You are farging clown shoes. If you think there is a single person on this board that takes a damn thing you say seriously, you're even dumber than I could possibly give you credit for. Maybe that fact that a large contigent of the board ignores just about everything you say makes us all a bunch of Hoydas, and that's okay, because you're an icehole, and dicks farg iceholes too. Keep posting your farging incoherent rubbish though, every village needs an idiot.

Quote from: FastFreddie on April 04, 2007, 11:33:18 AM
Taking the best attributes of Considine and Doss, you still would have a safety that gets burned in the passing game.

That is true, and according to Spads latest report on Considine's weight training, after combining the two, you would have a 760lb safety.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: mussa on April 04, 2007, 11:43:54 AM
Is anyone sponsoring Considine? 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Mad-Lad on April 04, 2007, 12:03:35 PM
I'll sponsor him.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhanInDC on April 04, 2007, 12:06:52 PM
I'm his sponsor......I think.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on April 04, 2007, 12:22:43 PM
Assuming the Schefter report is correct I would have liked Doss on a similar 1 year deal. He's insurance and an upgrade from Considine. I highly doubt a 1 year deal would have changed the Eagles draft strategy, which is what I believe fans were afraid of.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: DH on April 04, 2007, 12:45:59 PM
Confirmed...

Vikings | Team signs M. Doss
Wed, 4 Apr 2007 08:10:12 -0700

ESPNews reports the Minnesota Vikings signed free agent SS Mike Doss (Colts). Financial terms of the deal were not disclosed.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Mad-Lad on April 04, 2007, 01:05:54 PM
I'm glad ESPN News was able to confirm Adam Scheffter's confirmation that Doss signed with Minnesota.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on April 04, 2007, 01:11:07 PM
I won't believe it until Spadaro confirms also!

But, alas, the Vikings site has the story too:
Dossy McDoss (http://www.minnesotavikings.com/news_detail_objectname_DossSigns4407.html)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Dillen on April 04, 2007, 02:28:38 PM
Quote from: Beermonkey on April 04, 2007, 09:12:23 AM
Now the bitching will go from "Mike Doss is an older Michael Lewis" to "OMFG!! The Eagles let the Vikings get Doss!WTF were they doing with their thumbs up their asses!!"
Did people really say that? Because Doss is...you know, younger.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on April 04, 2007, 02:35:05 PM
Quote from: mussa on April 04, 2007, 11:43:54 AM
Is anyone sponsoring Considine? 

BALCO?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on April 04, 2007, 03:34:23 PM
Quote from: PPinDC on April 04, 2007, 11:40:21 AM

This is the last time I'm going to touch this, then I'm done.

You are farging clown shoes. If you think there is a single person on this board that takes a damn thing you say seriously, you're even dumber than I could possibly give you credit for. Maybe that fact that a large contigent of the board ignores just about everything you say makes us all a bunch of Hoydas, and that's okay, because you're an icehole, and dicks farg iceholes too. Keep posting your farging incoherent rubbish though, every village needs an idiot.

You took it seriously enough to respond with a paragraph you moron. Talking about contradictions, you walk away with the gold in that department.

I knew you wouldn't be able to let that one go though. That was too easy.

As for Doss, whatever. No loss.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on April 04, 2007, 03:41:55 PM
Quote from: Die-Hard on April 04, 2007, 12:45:59 PM
Confirmed...

Vikings | Team signs M. Doss
Wed, 4 Apr 2007 08:10:12 -0700

ESPNews reports the Minnesota Vikings signed free agent SS Mike Doss (Colts). Financial terms of the deal were not disclosed.


DAMMITT!!!!! 0-16 HERE WE COME!!!!!!!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Wingspan on April 04, 2007, 03:57:23 PM
That's being a little optimistic. I don't see them any better than 0-9...and then forfeits the rest of the way
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Beermonkey on April 04, 2007, 05:22:50 PM
Quote from: Dillen on April 04, 2007, 02:28:38 PM
Quote from: Beermonkey on April 04, 2007, 09:12:23 AM
Now the bitching will go from "Mike Doss is an older Michael Lewis" to "OMFG!! The Eagles let the Vikings get Doss!WTF were they doing with their thumbs up their asses!!"
Did people really say that? Because Doss is...you know, younger.

Yeah, they say all sorts of wacky things. I hear there's an Urlakker trade in the works, he may even be at the Novacare.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on April 04, 2007, 10:57:09 PM
(http://www.mcfarlane.com/toys/football/nfl15/bwestbrook/images/nfl15_bwestbrook_photo_01_dp.jpg)

(http://spawn.com/toys/football/nfllegends3/rwhite-eagles/images/nfllegends3_rwhite-eagles_photo_02_dp.jpg)



....and a new one...holy S this is bad... :-D

(http://spawn.com/toys/football/nfl15/wthomas/images/nfl15_wthomas_photo_01_dp.jpg)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Mad-Lad on April 05, 2007, 12:21:09 AM
of all the players on the roster... why would he make a friggin Thomas figure?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: General_Failure on April 05, 2007, 02:45:21 AM
He's going by Friggin now?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on April 05, 2007, 10:19:35 AM
Looks like they added 30 pounds or so to Reggie and Thomas's waist, they're sort of Simonlike now.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhanInDC on April 05, 2007, 10:21:39 AM
The one of Westbrook looks nothing like him. The one of Reggie pretty bad ass though.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on April 05, 2007, 10:26:34 AM
The Reggie one reminds me of Popeye:
(http://romegeorgia.com/dnordmen/popeye_strut.gif)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on April 05, 2007, 10:37:41 AM
the aqua undershirt reggie has is unacceptable

he also should have the black cleets they rocked
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Mad-Lad on April 05, 2007, 11:10:53 AM
he should have made an NFL Legends: Mike Labinjo figure, instead of Tra.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: phattymatty on April 05, 2007, 11:14:07 AM
pretty detailed though.  you can even see the sweat stain on reggie's gut.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on April 05, 2007, 11:15:25 AM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on April 05, 2007, 10:19:35 AM
Looks like they added 30 pounds or so to Reggie

He looks more like the Reggie in his final year with Green Bay than he did with the Eagles.  
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Mad-Lad on April 05, 2007, 11:16:02 AM
Quote from: phattymatty on April 05, 2007, 11:14:07 AM
pretty detailed though.  you can even see the sweat stain on reggie's gut.

that's not sweat.  that's what's left over from the game where Reggie, Clyde, and Seth all hit Merril Hodge so hard he crapped himself.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on April 05, 2007, 11:30:12 AM
Quote from: Sgt PSN on April 05, 2007, 11:15:25 AM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on April 05, 2007, 10:19:35 AM
Looks like they added 30 pounds or so to Reggie

He looks more like the Reggie in his final year with Green Bay than he did with the Eagles.  
They got lazy  http://store.spawn.com/SearchResult.aspx?CategoryID=176
(http://store.spawn.com/images/toys/football/nfllegends3/rwhite-packers/images/nfllegends3_rwhite-packers_photo_01_sm.jpg)(http://store.spawn.com/images/toys/football/nfllegends3/rwhite-eagles/images/nfllegends3_rwhite-eagles_photo_01_sm.jpg)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Mad-Lad on April 05, 2007, 11:31:28 AM
it's not lazy, just a variant.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on April 05, 2007, 11:32:04 AM
Quote from: Seabiscuit36 on April 05, 2007, 11:30:12 AM
Quote from: Sgt PSN on April 05, 2007, 11:15:25 AM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on April 05, 2007, 10:19:35 AM
Looks like they added 30 pounds or so to Reggie

He looks more like the Reggie in his final year with Green Bay than he did with the Eagles.  
They got lazy  http://store.spawn.com/SearchResult.aspx?CategoryID=176
(http://store.spawn.com/images/toys/football/nfllegends3/rwhite-packers/images/nfllegends3_rwhite-packers_photo_01_sm.jpg)(http://store.spawn.com/images/toys/football/nfllegends3/rwhite-eagles/images/nfllegends3_rwhite-eagles_photo_01_sm.jpg)

That explains it.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on April 05, 2007, 11:34:26 AM
I hear ya mad, but make him slimmer like he was back with the birds.  The military ones look really great too.
(http://store.spawn.com/images/toys/military/military5/arsfo/images/military5_arsfo_photo_01_dp.jpg)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on April 05, 2007, 11:35:14 AM
I posed for that.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on April 05, 2007, 11:36:58 AM
What a striking resemblance:
(http://www.boomspeed.com/superpsn/sargebeeropener.jpg)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on April 05, 2007, 11:40:36 AM
ha!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Mad-Lad on April 05, 2007, 11:58:57 AM
I'm not saying he shouldn't be slimmer.  If McFarlane didn't do variants, he would have released a Packers Reggie figure only.  Why the hell did he make a Tra figure?!  that still baffles me.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on April 05, 2007, 12:05:57 PM
one of my favorite possesions is my 1987 reggie 8x10 where he has a washboard stomach and looks like jeremiah trotter circa 2002 not a monsterous dominating defensive end
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: mussa on April 05, 2007, 12:11:56 PM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on April 05, 2007, 11:36:58 AM
What a striking resemblance:
(http://www.boomspeed.com/superpsn/sargebeeropener.jpg)

I was gonna say. Where are the 2007 party glasses?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on April 05, 2007, 12:46:59 PM
That was a different game......Tennessee I believe. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on April 05, 2007, 12:49:49 PM
The real genius of that picture is behind the camera.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on April 05, 2007, 12:56:05 PM
I thought you took the picture? 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on April 05, 2007, 12:56:30 PM
i wouldnt label taking a picture of another mans cock genius
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Mad-Lad on April 05, 2007, 12:57:19 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on April 05, 2007, 12:56:30 PM
i wouldnt label taking a picture of another mans cock genius

that looks like a beer to me
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on April 05, 2007, 12:58:48 PM
Quote from: Mad-Lad on April 05, 2007, 12:57:19 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on April 05, 2007, 12:56:30 PM
i wouldnt label taking a picture of another mans cock genius

that looks like a beer to me

He meant "mental picture"
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on April 05, 2007, 01:03:03 PM
IGY is obviously obsessed with Sarge's bottlejohnson.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on April 05, 2007, 01:08:11 PM
Yeah, but who isn't?  Seriously? 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on April 05, 2007, 01:09:34 PM
IGY is obviously obsessed with Sarge's boobie necklace

yes
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on April 05, 2007, 01:20:26 PM
ha, i don't know how many times i had to convince myself not to try and strangle him with that
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: mussa on April 05, 2007, 01:35:12 PM
Quote from: Sgt PSN on April 05, 2007, 12:46:59 PM
That was a different game......Tennessee I believe. 

No I meant, the mini-sarge soldier. He should have those glasses...
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on April 05, 2007, 01:36:17 PM
Quote from: mussa on April 05, 2007, 01:35:12 PM
Quote from: Sgt PSN on April 05, 2007, 12:46:59 PM
That was a different game......Tennessee I believe. 

No I meant, the mini-sarge soldier. He should have those glasses...

They're not tactical.  Duh. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on April 05, 2007, 01:38:19 PM
CONSIDINE IS BEEFCAKE (http://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/news/newsDetail.jsp?id=66949)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on April 05, 2007, 01:39:36 PM
farging christ...they really aren't going to take a safety first
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on April 05, 2007, 01:56:42 PM
unless they draft Dawkins' replacement...

It sounds like CB with an outside shot of DE for the 1st-rd pick...
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on April 05, 2007, 02:00:02 PM
a cb in the first round would make me sick
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on April 05, 2007, 02:08:54 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on April 05, 2007, 02:00:02 PM
a cb in the first round would make me sick

GET YO BARFBAG READY
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on April 05, 2007, 02:10:58 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on April 05, 2007, 02:00:02 PM
a cb in the first round would make me sick
Sheldon would make an excellent safety  :-D
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on April 05, 2007, 02:52:40 PM
i know we are all just speculating and cb could be last on their list of first round picks...but can someone even make a semi intelligent argument as to why they would take a cb in round one

imo the first pick should be the best defensive player on the board that isnt a CB
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on April 05, 2007, 02:58:53 PM
The defensive backs are fine.

(http://boards.philadelphiaeagles.com/style_images/1/f_spadaro.jpg)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on April 05, 2007, 03:00:58 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on April 05, 2007, 02:52:40 PM
imo the first pick should be the best defensive player on the board that isnt a CB

I agree with this. However, the CBs got farging cooked over and over for the past two years. I don't think it's a position of need, but I wouldn't cry if they brought someone in to push the two starters.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on April 05, 2007, 03:11:45 PM
If Revis is there, i'm ok with him getting picked but mccauley or ross do not excite me at all
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on April 05, 2007, 03:15:53 PM
I agree with this. However, the CBs got farging cooked over and over for the past two years

even if you believe this (btw its not true) the cornerbacks still contain the best combination of youth and talent of any position on the defense...thus even if you think the corners suck it still warrants the least attention when it comes to pick #1
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on April 05, 2007, 03:23:47 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on April 05, 2007, 03:15:53 PM
I agree with this. However, the CBs got farging cooked over and over for the past two years

even if you believe this (btw its not true) the cornerbacks still contain the best combination of youth and talent of any position on the defense...thus even if you think the corners suck it still warrants the least attention when it comes to pick #1

I'm not arguing with that, and I'll even concede that the secondary's lapses can be at least partially blamed on failings of the rest of the defense. Safety, LB, DE and DT are all bigger needs. I'm just saying that drafting a CB wouldn't be unfathomable.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: mussa on April 05, 2007, 03:24:22 PM
Good for Considine  :yay
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on April 05, 2007, 03:31:17 PM
I'm just saying that drafting a CB wouldn't be unfathomable.

i agree....retarded but not unfathomable
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on April 05, 2007, 03:41:08 PM
There might not be a LB, DT or DE on the board worth taking at 26, but there should be a safety there worth taking. The question comes down to are the CBs that will be there better than the Safeties that will be there? Safety is the bigger need, but do they just want the better player in general?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on April 05, 2007, 05:53:37 PM
They should draft AIDS. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: hbionic on April 05, 2007, 07:07:09 PM
BOO.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on April 05, 2007, 11:54:58 PM
QuoteMACKLIN GIVES 'SKINS A DISCOUNT

The Washington taterskins have a reputation for overpaying free agents.  On Thursday, a free agent specifically took less money for a chance to join the team.

Per Adam Schefter of NFL Network, cornerback David Macklin rejected more lucrative offers from the Chiefs and Eagles to sign a one-year, $760,000 deal with the 'Skins.

Macklin accepted the lower deal because he is from Newport News, Virginia, and grew up as a taterskins fan.  Also, Macklin always wanted to play for Hall of Fame coach Joe Gibbs.

Macklin is a seven-year veteran who spent the first fiour seasons of his career with the Colts and the last three with the Cardinals.  He started the last six games of the 2006 season in Arizona.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: mussa on April 06, 2007, 12:00:25 AM
damnit! 0-16. book it
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Stallworth Supporter on April 06, 2007, 12:33:04 AM
Yes, I agree, the taterskins will be 0-16!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MDS on April 06, 2007, 01:52:31 AM
QuoteIn the past month or two there have been a ridiculous amount of new threads and an even more ridiculous amount of posts with an attitude that is blatently condescending towards Joe Gibbs and Greg Williams. As a very passionate taterskins/football fan, sometimes I may not whole-heartedly agree with every single thing that they do or say, but as a long time skins fan I respect the experience, knowledge, and proven championship record of our beloved coach who we are extremely lucky to have. These are just a few examples of how these 2 especially have earned our respect and admiration.

#1 Made many good FA deals. ( such as ARE, Moss, Portis, etc. more recently Fletcher, Smoot)

#2 Drafted Taylor, Campbell, Rogers, etc.

#3 Have done everything in their power to try and give us (the fans) a chance to win more and restore the respect that so many have tried to take away.

#4 Gibbs acquired some of the best coaches in the league to give us the training and confidence needed to be a championship team.

#5 GW helped make our defense a force to be feared and reckoned with by blitzing, blitzing, blitzing sometimes when it wasn't necesary just to lay down the intimidation.

Not to mention all of our superbowl victories and other fabulous memories that would never have been possible without JG.

I guess what I am saying is "I am proud to be a taterskins fan and whatever battles or difficulties lie ahead I know that our general can lead us through victorious, and there are an unsettlingly large number of people who are truly to pessimistic about a very PROMISING future.

The truth of the matter is: We had a bad season last year for numerous reasons not just 1 or 2 and most of those problemed areas have been addressed by very qualified and win-focused people.

They call it the past for a reason. You learn from it and then you move on.
I am as patriotic about my team as I am my country and fellow countrymen.

So cheer up and Hail to America's REAL team.


Sorry to cover some content already included in other threads but I thought it was important to focus on this aspect of our team spirit.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Don Ho on April 06, 2007, 04:15:15 AM

QuoteI guess what I am saying is "I am proud to be a taterskins fan and whatever battles or difficulties lie ahead I know that our general can lead us through victorious, and there are an unsettlingly large number of people who are truly to pessimistic about a very PROMISING future.

The truth of the matter is: We had a bad season last year for numerous reasons not just 1 or 2 and most of those problemed areas have been addressed by very qualified and win-focused people.

They call it the past for a reason. You learn from it and then you move on.
I am as patriotic about my team as I am my country and fellow countrymen.

So cheer up and Hail to America's REAL team.

.

what he's trying to say is "NERDS! NERDS! NERDS! NERDS!"

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on April 06, 2007, 06:26:42 AM
not to turn this into a ES thread but this is classic....


#2 Drafted Taylor, Campbell, Rogers, etc.


rogers has been a disappointment....campbell is unproven but mostly id like to know who ect. is
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on April 06, 2007, 10:30:19 AM
etc = Ramsey
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on April 06, 2007, 10:34:02 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on April 06, 2007, 06:26:42 AM
not to turn this into a ES thread but this is classic....


#2 Drafted Taylor, Campbell, Rogers, etc.


rogers has been a disappointment....campbell is unproven but mostly id like to know who ect. is

Everywhere outside of IGYland, Taylor is a physicial giant and a mental midget also.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on April 06, 2007, 03:47:14 PM
(http://img475.imageshack.us/img475/7564/lykareednd4.jpg)

From PE.com's Fan Friday photos...   :sly
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on April 06, 2007, 03:51:56 PM
Hit

I don't like Asian chicks and she's a little thick for my taste but there's something about her that gives me a woody.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on April 06, 2007, 03:53:14 PM
there's something about her that gives me a woody.

the eagles jersey?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on April 06, 2007, 03:56:31 PM
Well...that too
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on April 06, 2007, 03:58:58 PM
Is it the fact that she looks like she's built like a man?  Check her friggin calf muscles, yo. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on April 06, 2007, 04:01:37 PM
id be more worried about her box and the fact that it most likely smells like turkey cold cuts
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on April 06, 2007, 04:03:04 PM
sweet wood paneling
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on April 06, 2007, 04:04:02 PM
Quote from: Sgt PSN on April 06, 2007, 03:58:58 PM
Is it the fact that she looks like she's built like a man?  Check her friggin calf muscles, yo. 

I can hear her saying 'Me So Horny'
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on April 06, 2007, 04:10:04 PM
You manwhores would all hit it so shaddup.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: QB Eagles on April 06, 2007, 05:44:03 PM
A Cambodian of questionable gender? Nah, I'll pass. Besides, I wouldn't want to catch whatever STDs Demon gave her back in the Navy days.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: phattymatty on April 07, 2007, 11:16:21 AM
thats a dude fo sho.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Father Demon on April 07, 2007, 11:31:48 AM
Quote from: QB Eagles on April 06, 2007, 05:44:03 PM
A Cambodian of questionable gender? Nah, I'll pass. Besides, I wouldn't want to catch whatever STDs Demon gave her back in the Navy days.

Air Force.  And almost everything I caught is curable.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on April 07, 2007, 11:33:29 AM
Round head right Demon, i worked with Cambodians for a while.  Very round heads. 

Anyway, PFT is reporting that Kris Jenkins is on the block.  He'd be the answer to our DT problems
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on April 07, 2007, 12:17:53 PM
Charlotte observer Jenkins trade link (http://charlotte.com/141/story/77146.html)

Jenkins has some work ethic, conditioning, and injury problems, but when he's healthy he's one of the top DTs in the league. He'd be a perfect fit for our D, he can clog the middle and rush the passer. He's the odd man out in Carolina, so they won't be trying to rape anyone as far as a trade goes, Rayburn + our 2 might get it done.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on April 07, 2007, 12:21:57 PM
I'd do that in a heartbeat SD. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on April 07, 2007, 12:26:16 PM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on April 07, 2007, 12:17:53 PM
He's the odd man out in Carolina, so they won't be trying to rape anyone as far as a trade goes, Rayburn + our 2 might get it done.

If Kris Jenkins is the odd man out, where does Rayburn fit in to their plans?

I wouldn't trade much more than a naked 3rd for Jenkins.  Rayburn is a throw-in - so fine.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on April 07, 2007, 12:33:42 PM
Rayburn is a throw in, he has some late round value so maybe they could move him.

Jenkins is coming off a Pro-bowl season in a league where good DTs are hard to find. The Ravens were set to give us a 2nd and 3rd for Simon and would still have had to sign him to a long term deal. Simon is nowhere near the player Jenkins is. We get Jenkins and our D is set, we have enough young guys where we can afford to splurge on a good/great player and still not have it effect our future. This move is a no brainer to me.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on April 07, 2007, 01:12:17 PM
Quote from: FastFreddie on April 07, 2007, 12:26:16 PM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on April 07, 2007, 12:17:53 PM
He's the odd man out in Carolina, so they won't be trying to rape anyone as far as a trade goes, Rayburn + our 2 might get it done.

If Kris Jenkins is the odd man out, where does Rayburn fit in to their plans?

I wouldn't trade much more than a naked 3rd for Jenkins.  Rayburn is a throw-in - so fine.

I agree.  I wouldn't go much higher than a 3rd.  He's a beast on the field... problem is, he's never there.

He's played 21 games in the last 3 seasons.  Missed 27.  That's Buckhalter type stuff right there.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on April 07, 2007, 01:45:27 PM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on April 07, 2007, 12:33:42 PM
Rayburn is a throw in, he has some late round value so maybe they could move him.

Jenkins is coming off a Pro-bowl season in a league where good DTs are hard to find. The Ravens were set to give us a 2nd and 3rd for Simon and would still have had to sign him to a long term deal. Simon is nowhere near the player Jenkins is. We get Jenkins and our D is set, we have enough young guys where we can afford to splurge on a good/great player and still not have it effect our future. This move is a no brainer to me.

At the time Simon was being franchised/on the trade block, his value was higher than Jenkins' is right now.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on April 07, 2007, 01:49:20 PM
I don't see how, Jenkins is coming cheaper than it would have taken to sign Simon, plus he's a better player. Simon wasn't coming off a pro-bowl season either.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on April 07, 2007, 01:52:55 PM
You obviously want to have Kris Jenkins' man-babies, but it's fairly simple:

Jenkins finally played last season for the first time in 3 seasons, and now his team is putting him on the trading block... despite the fact he's making right around $3m in salary each of the next 3 seasons - not unreasonable at all.

He's obviously not the same player he was in 2001-2003, thanks to his injuries.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on April 07, 2007, 01:59:07 PM
He's still a top 10 DT in the league and comes with a manageable salary. You're just upset because it'll mean less playing time for Patterson.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Drunkmasterflex on April 07, 2007, 05:01:49 PM
I was listening to NFL radio today and they were saying that Jenkins was not worthy of the Pro Bowl this past season FWIW.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Don Ho on April 07, 2007, 05:56:02 PM
Quote from: Drunkmasterflex on April 07, 2007, 05:01:49 PM
I was listening to NFL radio today and they were saying that Jenkins was not worthy of the Pro Bowl this past season FWIW.

I am true believer that the Pro Bowl is not an honor but a penalty of some sort.  For both he players and fans, the actual game that is.  The week of endless parties and staying at a 5 star resort is the ticket for the players.  The fans that go, myself included, therapy.  Lots of therapy.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on April 07, 2007, 06:19:16 PM
I wouldn't give up a 2nd rounder for Jenkins. He is too injury prone and as stated, isn't what he once was. He still is an upgrade over what we have though, so I'd take him if the price is right.

Who knows what Carolina is asking for.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on April 07, 2007, 07:43:58 PM
^^^^^^^^Proof that I'm right
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on April 07, 2007, 08:26:12 PM
haha
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on April 07, 2007, 09:05:32 PM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on April 07, 2007, 07:43:58 PM
^^^^^^^^Proof that I'm right

You've hit an all time :CF low if you're pointing to Queen Cole to validate your argument. 

Bad squid! 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: phillymic2000 on April 07, 2007, 10:25:41 PM
Quote from: King Cole on April 07, 2007, 06:19:16 PM
Who knows what Carolina is asking for.

Another Back up QB
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on April 07, 2007, 10:34:47 PM
Quote from: Sgt PSN on April 07, 2007, 09:05:32 PM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on April 07, 2007, 07:43:58 PM
^^^^^^^^Proof that I'm right

You've hit an all time :CF low if you're pointing to Queen Cole to validate your argument. 

Bad squid! 

I'm actually doing just the opposite
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on April 07, 2007, 10:45:27 PM
Are not!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Father Demon on April 07, 2007, 11:25:01 PM
The fact that he's on the block with a decent salary and "Pro Bowl" status just shows he isn't what he used to be.  If he was, he wouldn't be the odd man out.

That said, he's better than half our guys, so take him if he's cheap.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on April 08, 2007, 08:05:16 AM
Quote from: Father Demon on April 07, 2007, 11:25:01 PM
The fact that he's on the block with a decent salary and "Pro Bowl" status just shows he isn't what he used to be.  If he was, he wouldn't be the odd man out.

That said, he's better than half our guys, so take him if he's cheap.

Exactly.  Winn4r.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on April 08, 2007, 08:17:59 AM
Let's see...

Jenkins is past his prime:  CHECK

Jenkins has a fairly reasonable salary:  CHECK

Jenkins could be obtained for peanuts relatively speaking:  CHECK


Oh, yeah... he'll be an Eagle fo sho.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on April 08, 2007, 10:54:33 AM
Quote from: Jerome99RIP on April 08, 2007, 08:17:59 AM
Let's see...

Jenkins is past his prime:  CHECK

Jenkins has a fairly reasonable salary:  CHECK

Jenkins could be obtained for peanuts relatively speaking:  CHECK


Oh, yeah... he'll be an Eagle fo sho.


you forgot always injured..Check
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on April 08, 2007, 04:26:25 PM
Quote from: Jerome99RIP on April 08, 2007, 08:17:59 AM
Let's see...

Jenkins is past his prime:  CHECK

Jenkins has a fairly reasonable salary:  CHECK

Jenkins could be obtained for peanuts relatively speaking:  CHECK


Oh, yeah... he'll be an Eagle fo sho.



He's a big DT(what they need), that works against the Eagles.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on April 08, 2007, 04:34:56 PM
(http://www.wmmr.com/albums/Phillys-Hottest-Eagles-Fan/Kim_2.jpg)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on April 08, 2007, 04:38:38 PM
(http://blog.theavclub.tv/wp-content/uploads/2007/01/borat-high-five.jpg)

Niiiiiiiiiiiiiiiice, high fiiiiiiiive!!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Eaglez on April 08, 2007, 05:03:34 PM
Fan Friday Photo?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on April 09, 2007, 07:28:40 PM
My buddy won 6 tickets to the draft day fiesta at the Linc, yours truly is going.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on April 09, 2007, 07:34:29 PM
thats awsome SD
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on April 10, 2007, 07:26:50 AM
icehole.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Beermonkey on April 10, 2007, 08:56:13 AM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on April 09, 2007, 07:28:40 PM
My buddy won 6 tickets to the draft day fiesta at the Linc, yours truly is going.


Didn't your "buddy" win Super Bowl tickets a few years back too?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhanInDC on April 10, 2007, 09:28:20 AM
Not to rain on SD's parade, but I went to the Draft Day Party at the Linc last year. Most was a waste of time, but there were some cool things, getting to walk around on the field, in the locker rooms, shtein like that. What sucked balls was Spads with a microphone ALL DAY, crazy expensive booze, standing room only, and retarded, crazed Eagles fans. I won't go again.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on April 10, 2007, 09:33:46 AM
yeah id pretty much kill myself before i ever went to an atrocity like that
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Geowhizzer on April 10, 2007, 09:41:24 AM
Quote from: PPinDC on April 10, 2007, 09:28:20 AM
Not to rain on SD's parade, but I went to the Draft Day Party at the Linc last year. Most was a waste of time, but there were some cool things, getting to walk around on the field, in the locker rooms, shtein like that. What sucked balls was Spads with a microphone ALL DAY, crazy expensive booze, standing room only, and retarded, crazed Eagles fans. I won't go again.

Most "fan days" anywhere should come with a tube of vaseline, since all they're trying to do is screw you over once more.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on April 10, 2007, 10:13:26 AM
Quote from: Beermonkey on April 10, 2007, 08:56:13 AM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on April 09, 2007, 07:28:40 PM
My buddy won 6 tickets to the draft day fiesta at the Linc, yours truly is going.


Didn't your "buddy" win Super Bowl tickets a few years back too?
I freakin wish
Quote from: PPinDC on April 10, 2007, 09:28:20 AM
Not to rain on SD's parade, but I went to the Draft Day Party at the Linc last year. Most was a waste of time, but there were some cool things, getting to walk around on the field, in the locker rooms, shtein like that. What sucked balls was Spads with a microphone ALL DAY, crazy expensive booze, standing room only, and retarded, crazed Eagles fans. I won't go again.
Sounds cool to me, we're gonna tailgate and stuff beforehand. Plus I get to dust off and wear my Eagles gear for a day.
Quote from: ice grillin you on April 10, 2007, 09:33:46 AM
yeah id pretty much kill myself before i ever went to an atrocity like that
There's an extra ticket if you're interested
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on April 10, 2007, 10:35:38 AM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on April 10, 2007, 10:13:26 AM
There's an extra ticket if you're interested

LOL

BTW: I was the one who won Super Bowl tickets a couple of years ago. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on April 10, 2007, 10:54:16 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on April 10, 2007, 09:33:46 AM
yeah id pretty much kill myself before i ever went to an atrocity like that

Exactly.  Why the hell would I do that when I can host a poker game and get drunk in front of the TV?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Mad-Lad on April 10, 2007, 10:59:53 AM
Quote from: PPinDC on April 10, 2007, 09:28:20 AM
Crazy expensive booze, standing room only, and retarded, crazed Eagles fans.

During the Eagles/Saints playoff game, the bartender asked if i was an Eagles fan, why I wasn't at Hi-Topps up in Wrigleyville?  Apparently, that's where the Eagles contingent here in chicago gathers for game time.  PPinDC's response is EXACTLY why I'll never attend those game day functions.  the last thing i need during a farging playoff game is some knucklehead from the philadelphia area questioning my eagles fandom.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on April 10, 2007, 11:34:03 AM
I went to the draft party 2 years ago at Kahunaville in wilmington.  Basically i got smashed, dropped 100 bucks on beer and food.  It was great though, leaving people were crashing into cars, i had to get my wife to pick me and my brother in law up. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: paco on April 10, 2007, 12:45:52 PM
Quote from: FastFreddie on April 10, 2007, 10:54:16 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on April 10, 2007, 09:33:46 AM
yeah id pretty much kill myself before i ever went to an atrocity like that

Exactly.  Why the hell would I do that when I can host a poker game and get drunk in front of the TV?

Wait a sec.  Poker, drinking and draft day and I don't get an invite.  Deek.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on April 10, 2007, 12:51:44 PM
Yeah, because you'd totally make it from Zimbabwe... or wherever the farg you're at these days.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on April 10, 2007, 01:08:37 PM
my boy in baltimore has a draft/poker/stripper party...i fully expect dio to show this year
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Mad-Lad on April 10, 2007, 01:21:32 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on April 10, 2007, 01:08:37 PM
my boy in baltimore has a draft/poker/stripper party...i fully expect dio to show this year

as long as your boy isn't the stripper, i'm sure you'll have a good time.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on April 10, 2007, 05:44:10 PM
Bowtie with Anna Nicole Smith
(http://www.celebritywonder.com/picture/Anna_Nicole_Smith/DhaniJonesof_Kambouris_5356182.jpg)
(http://www.celebritywonder.com/picture/Anna_Nicole_Smith/DhaniJonesof_Kambouris_5356184.jpg)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on April 10, 2007, 07:00:59 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on April 10, 2007, 01:08:37 PM
my boy in baltimore has a draft/poker/stripper party...i fully expect dio to show this year

I don't do poker or strippers.  I have been to the draft three times though. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on April 10, 2007, 07:35:28 PM
Quote from: Diomedes on April 10, 2007, 07:00:59 PM
I don't do poker or strippers.

Do I even have to say it? (http://www.concretefield.com/forum/index.php?topic=19487.0)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on April 11, 2007, 06:29:35 AM
honestly i dont either....i have played poker but im not a big fan and ive only been to a strip bar twice in my life and both times was after this draft party
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on April 11, 2007, 08:05:17 AM
poker in the front, liquor in the rear, LOL!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Magical_Retard on April 11, 2007, 12:47:03 PM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on April 10, 2007, 05:44:10 PM
Bowtie with Anna Nicole Smith
(http://www.celebritywonder.com/picture/Anna_Nicole_Smith/DhaniJonesof_Kambouris_5356182.jpg)
(http://www.celebritywonder.com/picture/Anna_Nicole_Smith/DhaniJonesof_Kambouris_5356184.jpg)

was she really that tall or is he that small?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on April 11, 2007, 12:50:43 PM
She was standing on her daughter's placenta.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Geowhizzer on April 11, 2007, 01:09:12 PM
According to Wikipedia, she was 5'11".

And I can't believe I just looked that up.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Magical_Retard on April 11, 2007, 06:47:46 PM
Quote from: Jerome99RIP on April 11, 2007, 12:50:43 PM
She was standing on her daughter's placenta.

:-D :-D :-D
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on April 13, 2007, 11:51:02 AM
Kris Jenkins wouldn't make it in Philly (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rnRRug6WuL0)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on April 13, 2007, 03:17:13 PM
Get Wilson with no compensation? (http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2836410)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on April 13, 2007, 03:37:33 PM
sure, if he injures himself make sure they structure it so it wont hurt capwise
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on April 13, 2007, 03:44:11 PM
The linebackers are fine.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on April 13, 2007, 03:51:38 PM
I'd take Wilson at a 1 year $1 million deal like Shawn Barber signed
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on April 13, 2007, 04:08:26 PM
Same. I'd take him at a 1 year deal. If he can still play then he is a nice pickup.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on April 13, 2007, 04:12:24 PM
They're fine, damn it!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyGirl on April 13, 2007, 05:36:42 PM
There was an accounting oversight and the Eagles overpaid Westbrook $3 million.

Was this already reported?

By CBA law, the Eagles have to file a mandatory grievance against Westbrook (which is obviously knows about and is fine with) so it doesn't count against the cap. Westbrook is paying the money back. lol

Wow.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on April 13, 2007, 05:42:46 PM
Quote from: PhillyGirl on April 13, 2007, 05:36:42 PM
There was an accounting oversight and the Eagles overpaid Westbrook $3 million.

Was this already reported?

By CBA law, the Eagles have to file a mandatory grievance against Westbrook (which is obviously knows about and is fine with) so it doesn't count against the cap. Westbrook is paying the money back. lol

Wow.

So much for Joe Banner and Howie whatshispenis being the supernerds they're billed as.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MURP on April 13, 2007, 11:23:26 PM
westy link

http://philadelphia.comcastsportsnet.com/view_content_0p.asp?ID=48475
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on April 13, 2007, 11:35:57 PM
So the Eagles basically gave Westbrook the three million which he could have stuck in an ordinary money market account for four months and made an extra few thousand bucks on.

Nice.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: JackStraw on April 14, 2007, 12:01:13 AM
Ironically, he's one of the few guys on the team that should get to keep it.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on April 14, 2007, 06:55:33 AM
Gold Silver Bronze Pyrite Tin Rusty Aluminum Standard!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on April 14, 2007, 09:05:29 AM
Link (http://philadelphia.comcastsportsnet.com/view_content_0p.asp?ID=48469)
QuoteEagles Had Showed Interest in Wilson

The Associated Press

DENVER -- The Denver Broncos have released five-time Pro Bowl linebacker Al Wilson.

Wilson said Friday the team had told him the news the previous night.

His agent, Peter Schaffer said previously the Broncos were shopping Wilson around for a possible trade. The Broncos have committed big money to several free agents during the offseason, and Wilson is due $5.2 million in base salary this year.

He was nearly dealt to the New York Giants earlier this spring. However, he failed a physical and the Giants backed out of the trade. The Philadelphia Eagles and Detroit Lions also showed interest.

Wilson is a fan favorite and a locker room leader. He spoke at the funerals of cornerback Darrent Williams and running back Damien Nash this offseason, two young teammates who died in separate incidents.

Copyright 2007 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on April 14, 2007, 11:14:42 AM
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

:-D
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: QB Eagles on April 14, 2007, 12:32:39 PM
Quote from: Jerome99RIP on April 13, 2007, 11:35:57 PM
So the Eagles basically gave Westbrook the three million which he could have stuck in an ordinary money market account for four months and made an extra few thousand bucks on.

Nice.

Not so nice when you consider that he paid about a million dollars in taxes on it and that money is going to wind up coming right out of the Eagles' salary cap.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on April 14, 2007, 04:15:28 PM
No it won't.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on April 15, 2007, 09:54:32 AM
Quote from: FastFreddie on April 14, 2007, 06:55:33 AM
Gold Silver Bronze Pyrite Tin Rusty Aluminum Standard!

aluminum  can't rust
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on April 15, 2007, 09:57:07 AM
CMW what!?!?!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on April 15, 2007, 10:01:42 AM
if you don't know, now you know
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on April 16, 2007, 08:59:06 PM
Our training camp kicker from Pennsbury is back again (http://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/team/teamRosterDetails.jsp?id=47645)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on April 16, 2007, 09:01:21 PM
QuoteMajored in earth science and plans to become an avalanche forecaster.

ha!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: DH on April 17, 2007, 09:56:58 AM
Didnt see this anywhere...

Eagles | Team actively shopping Moats
Tue, 17 Apr 2007 02:09:37 -0700

John Murphy, of Yahoo! Sports, reports the Philadelphia Eagles are actively shopping RB Ryan Moats, according to a well-placed league source. The team will likely draft a bigger running back to use in the backup role, making Moats less likely to earn a spot on the active roster unless it would be for special teams purposes. A second source claims more than one team has already been contacted to gauge their initial interest, but the initial league source indicated the Eagles would likely receive a mid-round draft pick in the 2007 NFL Draft in exchange for Moats.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on April 17, 2007, 09:58:08 AM
if they can get anything, that's a win.  he serves no purpose on this team.  he is a Westbrook-type player, but Westbrook is better
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on April 17, 2007, 09:58:53 AM
Great news.  But do they really think they're going to get a mid round pick?  Ha.  RBs are a dime a dozen..and Moats has hardly done anything to distinguish himself.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on April 17, 2007, 10:05:22 AM
but Westbrook is better



(http://www.orlyowl.com/orly4.jpg)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on April 17, 2007, 10:58:01 AM
YES RLY
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on April 17, 2007, 11:04:09 AM
Moats farging sucks. No chance they'll get anything higher than a 5th for him. What a waste of a draft pick.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on April 17, 2007, 11:18:19 AM
Here are players they could have drafted instead of Moats, if they'd simply paid Westbrook instead of feeling the need to threaten him by drafting a wannabe replacement:

Ellis Hobbs (CB - Patriots)
Marion Barber
Brandon Jacobs
Kerry Rhodes (S - Jets)
Bo Scaife (TE - Titans)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on April 17, 2007, 11:19:56 AM
Kerry Rhodes....oh man
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on April 17, 2007, 11:22:06 AM
Its been said over and over again, Moats has natural RB talent but the mind of a treestump
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on April 17, 2007, 11:30:11 AM
oooohhhhh, i'm telling treestumps on you
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on April 17, 2007, 11:30:57 AM
They can unite with cavemen to make the worst Geico commercial ever.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on April 17, 2007, 12:35:26 PM
I'm gonna miss his ever so insightful and well written blogs.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on April 17, 2007, 12:36:26 PM
Quote from: SunMo on April 17, 2007, 11:19:56 AM
Kerry Rhodes....oh man

Right??  farg!!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on April 17, 2007, 12:44:28 PM
I hope you guys aren't being sarcastic, because Rhodes is an excellent young safety.


Actually, the Eagles also picked Sean "Beefcake" Considine before Rhodes.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on April 17, 2007, 12:44:54 PM
Not sarcastic at all.  He's money.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on April 17, 2007, 01:21:07 PM
i wasn't being sarcastic.  i want a safety bad in this draft, and to find out they could've taken Rhodes and didn't makes me sad
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on April 18, 2007, 10:46:06 AM
espn insider seven round mock is out....

eagles

1st -  Michael Griffin S Texas
2nd - Brian Leonard FB Rutgers
3rd - Quincy Black LB N Mexico
4th -  no pick
5th - Chansi Stuckey WR Clemson
6th - Corey Graham CB New Hampshire
7th - Joe Cohen DE Florida


Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MURP on April 18, 2007, 10:54:29 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on April 18, 2007, 10:46:06 AM

5th - Chansi Stuckey WR Clemson




what a name that is.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on April 18, 2007, 10:58:20 AM
What? They didn't factor in the 4th rounder that they're going to get for Ryan Moats?!?!?!?!?!??!?!?!?!?!?!?eight
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on April 18, 2007, 10:58:56 AM
they better at least get a 2nd for moats
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MDS on April 18, 2007, 02:04:41 PM
Andy got a 2nd for AJ Feely. So yea, a 2nd for Moats sounds about right.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Beermonkey on April 18, 2007, 02:21:11 PM
Quote from: MDS on April 18, 2007, 02:04:41 PM
Andy got a 2nd for AJ Feely. So yea, a 2nd for Moats sounds about right.

We'll more than likely to see them use Moats to trade up, instead of getting getting a pick outright. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on April 18, 2007, 03:31:40 PM
If you're bored and looking for something to piss you off more than the Phils, the Eagles/Saints playoff game is on the NFL network.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on April 18, 2007, 03:33:52 PM
Ha.

I still haven't watched the Super Bowl replay yet.  I just can't bring myself to do it.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on April 18, 2007, 03:38:51 PM
Superbowl is different, I couldn't watch that or the 2002 or 2003 NFCC.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Beermonkey on April 18, 2007, 03:44:24 PM
Quote from: Jerome99RIP on April 18, 2007, 03:33:52 PM
Ha.

I still haven't watched the Super Bowl replay yet.  I just can't bring myself to do it.

I almost start to cry when I try & watch that. I never made it past half-time yet.

My tape of the Bucs NFCC game affects me even worse. I would put it at the level of trying to watch a snuff film with my kids in it.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: mussa on April 18, 2007, 03:56:05 PM
agreed the conference champ. games are worse IMO. the superbowl was a game where we were so close, but just not good enough, Pats were just the better team. the Bucs and Panthers, we just utter bad loses to teams we could of beaten, which made it so much worse.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on April 18, 2007, 04:03:57 PM
eagles win the superbowl if mcnabb doesnt throw those int's and for that reason its way worse than any championship game...they SHOULD have and COULD have won...cant say both those things about any of the championship games...in those games they either could have OR should have...but not both

not to mention the superbowl is the big one...in the championship game losses you can somewhat lessen the pain by saying there is no guarantee they would have won the superbowl anyway
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on April 18, 2007, 04:06:08 PM
McNabb got zero protection all game and still made some great plays as well.

That game was won and lost at the lines.  Brady had all day, and the Patriots were able to run the ball.  McNabb never had much time, and the Eagles weren't able to run at all.

Blaming McNabb's INT's for the loss is ridiculously obtuse.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on April 18, 2007, 04:07:34 PM
You can pretty much be guaranteed that they would have smoked the Raiders.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on April 18, 2007, 04:44:34 PM
Quote from: Beermonkey on April 18, 2007, 02:21:11 PM

We'll more than likely to see them use Moats to trade up, instead of getting getting a pick outright. 

What he said
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on April 19, 2007, 04:30:03 AM
Quote from: FastFreddie on April 18, 2007, 04:06:08 PM
McNabb got zero protection all game and still made some great plays as well.

That game was won and lost at the lines.  Brady had all day, and the Patriots were able to run the ball.  McNabb never had much time, and the Eagles weren't able to run at all.

Blaming McNabb's INT's for the loss is ridiculously obtuse.

Thank you.  There are so many different things to point to other than McNabb's INT's as reasons for the SB loss.

1. The Defense letting the Pats score on 4 out of 5 possessions beginning in the 2nd quarter... including Lito's idiotic "bait" play.
2. Westbrook getting 21 yards (?) on the ground, which speaks to the zestyness of the o-line that game.

... right off the top of my head.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: DH on April 19, 2007, 08:42:27 AM
Quote from: King Cole on April 18, 2007, 04:44:34 PM
Quote from: Beermonkey on April 18, 2007, 02:21:11 PM

We'll more than likely to see them use Moats to trade up, instead of getting getting a pick outright. 

What he said

What is the point of making a post like this?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on April 19, 2007, 08:44:59 AM
Don't discourage! It's infinitely better than the vast majority of the nonsense he posts.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on April 19, 2007, 09:25:21 AM
Quote from: rjs246 on April 19, 2007, 08:44:59 AM
Don't discourage! It's infinitely better than the vast majority of the nonsense he posts.

What he said.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on April 19, 2007, 09:28:15 AM
like taking candy from a baby
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on April 19, 2007, 10:37:50 AM
sporting news eagles mock

1. Jarvis Moss DE Florida
2. Rufus Alexander OLB Oklahoma
3. Tony Franklin CB Virginia
5. Kenny Scott CB Georgia Tech
6. Zach Latimer ILB Oklahoma
7. Deon Anderson FB Connecticut


i like this one a lot
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on April 19, 2007, 10:39:43 AM
you like another DE for the first pick?

if they don't take Merriweather or Griffin i'm going to kill a baby
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on April 19, 2007, 10:43:21 AM
I like that the first five picks are defensive players.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on April 19, 2007, 10:49:11 AM
you like another DE for the first pick?

if its jarvis moss i do

you wont like griffin as much at safety in one or two years if chris gocong and juqua thomas are the ends

i like griffin a lot and would be more than happy to get him...but they need young DE's really bad
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on April 19, 2007, 10:49:50 AM
chris gocong is the next derrick thomas
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on April 19, 2007, 10:55:57 AM
except his career will be a car wreck not end in one
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Cerevant on April 19, 2007, 10:58:24 AM
I think these writers should specify if a mock draft represents what they think the teams will do, or if it represents what the writer thinks they should do.

Maybe the Eagles should draft a LB early, but we all know that they won't.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: mussa on April 19, 2007, 10:59:58 AM
kearse, howard, cole, juqua and who knows maybe McDougle will show up this year( :-X)

I don't want them taking a DE at number 1 or 2. We're good at DE for this year and next. We're not good at LB and S right now. Considine is unknown and Darth has a few years left. Trotter and Spikes are old and the other OLB position is unknown.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on April 19, 2007, 11:01:27 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on April 19, 2007, 10:55:57 AM
except his career will be a car wreck not end in one

majestic
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on April 19, 2007, 11:06:57 AM
Maybe the Eagles should draft a LB early, but we all know that they won't.

fwiw...espn the mag did  some research on first round picks over the last 15 years and found that linebackers have the highest % of success of any position


We're good at DE for this year and next

rly?

We're not good at LB and S right now. Considine is unknown and Darth has a few years left. Trotter and Spikes are old and the other OLB position is unknown.

thats comforting to know that considine is an unknown

trotter and takeo are old but kearse and howard are not?...if the de position is good for the next two years then so are the linebackers

if you prefer a safety over a de thats fine a good argument can be made...im on record as loving griffin nelson and merriweather...but to say they dont need a young talented de (or two) on the roster is nuts
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on April 19, 2007, 11:20:41 AM
The Bucs loss hurt more the Super Bowl.  The Eagles were heads and shoulders better than that bullshtein farging team and they blew it.  The Patriots were just as good as the Eagles.  They had a better quarterback and their head coach is 10,000 times better than fat boy. 

Yeah, losing the Super Bowl hurt a lot and I mean it when I say I can't stand to watch it, but the Bucs loss is the worst single loss I've ever experienced as a sports fan.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on April 19, 2007, 11:25:16 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on April 19, 2007, 10:37:50 AM
sporting news eagles mock

1. Jarvis Moss DE Florida


My buddy is a huge Gators fan (spends a ridiculous amount of money on season tickets too but I digress) and he was up there for the Blue-Orange game a few days ago.  Anyway, he met Jarvis Moss and said he was a scary looking dude but that he was also extremely nice and signed a ton of autographs for fans at one of the local watering holes after the game.

As much as I hate the Gators and everything about that miserable shteinhole of a school, I wouldn't mind having Moss on the Eagles.  Dook can play and he's exactly the type of player the Eagles could use out there.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on April 19, 2007, 11:26:57 AM
Yay!  Another tweener that can either play out of position at LB or be inconsistent at DE!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on April 19, 2007, 11:31:38 AM
The next Reggie White isn't available this year.  You do what you can with what you have, Mr. Sunshine.

;)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on April 19, 2007, 11:56:01 AM
plus the eagles badly need an influx of athleticism on the front seven...and they need to get younger there....moss fits both needs perfectly...hed be a fine pick
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Drunkmasterflex on April 19, 2007, 09:24:10 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on April 19, 2007, 11:56:01 AM
plus the eagles badly need an influx of athleticism on the front seven...and they need to get younger there....moss fits both needs perfectly...hed be a fine pick

I am with you on the Moss pick, but I would rather see them go after a guy like Tim Crowder in the second.  I really would like to see them get Griffin in the first. If they can't get him I really don't have a preference, other than that I don't what to see OL or WR(unless Ginn). 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Zanshin on April 20, 2007, 09:09:11 AM
Does this Tony Franklin also play barefoot?  That would be cool.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Philly Crew on April 20, 2007, 11:58:52 AM
Quote from: Zanshin on April 20, 2007, 09:09:11 AM
Does this Tony Franklin also play barefoot?  That would be cool.

Clifford Franklin has moves that even Clifford Franklin doesn't know about.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on April 20, 2007, 12:54:13 PM
I am with you on the Moss pick, but I would rather see them go after a guy like Tim Crowder in the second

i dont like crowder at any pick...theres questions about moss as well but at least moss has the upside due to his extreme athleticism...crowder isnt fast or quick and doesnt have any edge burst...hes just there....actually now that i think about it he sounds exactly like an andy reid guy....from what ive seen of him i question whether he can play in the league at all
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on April 20, 2007, 02:09:42 PM
The babysitting went well over the weekend, i ended up getting tickets for the Miami game and the Bears Game  :yay
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on April 20, 2007, 02:56:32 PM
Crowder = Brandon Whiting
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: methdeez on April 20, 2007, 03:23:04 PM
Excellent artice about the draft for all of you amatuer GM's who think you know who the Eagles should pick b/c you watch ESPN. (which seems like everyone on this damn board).

http://www.footballoutsiders.com/2007/04/19/ramblings/nfl-draft/5088/ (http://www.footballoutsiders.com/2007/04/19/ramblings/nfl-draft/5088/)

looks like Banner is correct in not drafting LB's early...
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on April 20, 2007, 03:47:01 PM
Quote from: methdeez on April 20, 2007, 03:23:04 PM
Excellent artice about the draft for all of you amatuer GM's who think you know who the Eagles should pick b/c you watch ESPN. (which seems like everyone on this damn board).



what a douchey statement...

and Banner has nothing to do with the draft, ass, it's Reid and Heckert

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on April 20, 2007, 03:54:32 PM
funny that the guy who wrote that piece is pimping espn the mag because in their draft preview issue they say that linebacker is the safest round one pick you can make

anyway in general these charts and graphs are all garbage...every pick in every year holds its own individual weight...going back to all the drafts since 1980 and finding that round five held some very good linebackers means absolutely nothing when it comes time for the eagles to make their pick this year at 26

i mean some of the numbers are neat and i admittedly read them myself but in the end this historical hodge podge of numbers means very little

that article you posted is on some billy beane ish....and is one of the most nerded out things ive seen this side of baseball


"Flat" histograms are found at guard, fullback, and special teams.

ha...WTF?


oh and banner rightfully so goes nowhere near the draft
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on April 20, 2007, 05:00:21 PM
Not sure if it was mentioned here yet, but Spadaro seems to be hinting that the game vs Detroit will be the 75th anniversary weekend.  Maybe the Luries will suck it up for one day and bring back the kelly greens...
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on April 20, 2007, 05:02:37 PM
dont you tease me easy
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: bobbyinlondon on April 20, 2007, 05:16:05 PM
Quote from: BigEd76 on April 20, 2007, 05:00:21 PM
Not sure if it was mentioned here yet, but Spadaro seems to be hinting that the game vs Detroit will be the 75th anniversary weekend.  Maybe the Luries will suck it up for one day and bring back the kelly greens...

Someone on the EMB wrote a couple of months back that it was rumored the Eagles were going to wear the Frankford Yellowjackets unis this year for a game. Would you know anything about that?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on April 20, 2007, 07:20:20 PM
Yep, its going to be the Yellow Jacket ones. I remember hearing that somewhere too.

I'd love to see the Kelly Green's back though.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on April 20, 2007, 07:58:55 PM
it's never going to happen, mostly because we all want it to so bad
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MDS on April 20, 2007, 09:08:49 PM
The Yellow Jackets jersey would be great, actually.

So would the Kelly Green's, but you can't expect the Lauries to do something like that. You know, good.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on April 20, 2007, 09:23:08 PM
the yellow jacket jerseys would only be cool if they wore leather helmets
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Wingspan on April 20, 2007, 09:28:29 PM
I never liked the late 80s/early 90s kelly green unis. I prefer the big white stiped sleaves of the early 80s. Hell at least they won a little in those
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on April 20, 2007, 11:08:27 PM
The Yellow Jackets jersey would be great, actually.

NO
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MURP on April 21, 2007, 12:01:24 AM
The Yellow Jackets dont have much to do with the Eagles.   The are seperate teams all together.  Dont see the point. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on April 21, 2007, 12:06:43 AM
that and their jerseys are butt farging ugly
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on April 21, 2007, 12:29:28 AM
If they wear the Kelly Green's the dude who we saw in the Charlotte hotel lobby who was rockin' his white #73 Lester Holmes jersey will love it.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on April 21, 2007, 12:40:49 AM
you were in charlotte j?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on April 21, 2007, 08:41:23 AM
They didn't win a lot in the late 80's/early 90's?   :sly


Anyway - The latest from Ray Diddy on the draft. (http://philadelphia.comcastsportsnet.com/view_content_1p.asp?ID=48795)

He suggests Johnson & Landry (no chance) and Posluszny & Brian Leonard for the Eagles.  Interesting take from a guy who knows his shtein.  I was fairly surprised about the P.P. pimping.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on April 21, 2007, 08:51:05 AM
DGunn is reporting the Eagles are exploring trades to move up in the draft. Probably just a smoke screen but I'll throw it out there anyway.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Wingspan on April 21, 2007, 08:54:41 AM
Quote from: Jerome99RIP on April 21, 2007, 08:41:23 AM
They didn't win a lot in the late 80's/early 90's?   :sly

You right, the won nothing.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on April 21, 2007, 08:57:50 AM
Come on, Wing...   :-D
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on April 21, 2007, 09:00:11 AM
From Spadaro's "Heckert Interview" article yesterday:

QuoteAnd Heckert is still high on Matt McCoy and he thinks that both Ryan Moats and Scott Young are ascending players.

Has anyone seen rjs yet this morning?  I think someone should check on him.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Eagaholic on April 21, 2007, 09:27:16 AM
sounds more like Heckert is high on roofies.

although I do have to admit, I'm in the minority who would still like to see Moats get another shot.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on April 21, 2007, 09:33:28 AM
The only way Moats sniffs the field is if Westbrook gets hurt (God forbid).

Otherwise, he's a waste of a roster spot.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on April 21, 2007, 09:40:29 AM
Quote from: Eagaholic on April 21, 2007, 09:27:16 AM


although I do have to admit, I'm in the minority who would still like to see Moats get another shot.
I don't think he's as bad as he's made out to be, and he'd of been utilized more if he could hold onto the ball. That being said, I want a develpmental back with a larger build as the 3rd guy. Moats has no place on this team, if they can get anything for him I'd call it  victory.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Eagaholic on April 21, 2007, 09:47:01 AM
just because he fumbles alot, doesn't know the playbook, can't pick up the blitz, and got a concussion the first time he touched the ball, doesn't mean he everyone should be down on him.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on April 21, 2007, 09:56:14 AM
Quote from: Eagaholic on April 21, 2007, 09:47:01 AM
just because he fumbles alot, doesn't know the playbook, can't pick up the blitz, and got a concussion the first time he touched the ball, doesn't mean he everyone should be down on him.

You forgot ugly, lazy, and disrespectful
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on April 21, 2007, 10:00:42 AM
and a terrible blogger
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on April 21, 2007, 10:42:22 AM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on April 21, 2007, 09:56:14 AM
Quote from: Eagaholic on April 21, 2007, 09:47:01 AM
just because he fumbles alot, doesn't know the playbook, can't pick up the blitz, and got a concussion the first time he touched the ball, doesn't mean he everyone should be down on him.

You forgot ugly, lazy, and disrespectful

Shut up bitch and fix me a turkey pot pie.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on April 21, 2007, 12:58:23 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on April 21, 2007, 12:40:49 AM
you were in charlotte j?

Yeah, in 2003. When Kasay missed all those kicks. I think we tailgated right by your crew. Y'all had the Welcome to South Philly sign, right?

Good times down there. I was shteinfaced the night before. Bad. FF was on his game too, ask him all about it.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyGirl on April 21, 2007, 02:07:45 PM
Quote from: Jerome99RIP on April 21, 2007, 10:42:22 AM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on April 21, 2007, 09:56:14 AM
Quote from: Eagaholic on April 21, 2007, 09:47:01 AM
just because he fumbles alot, doesn't know the playbook, can't pick up the blitz, and got a concussion the first time he touched the ball, doesn't mean he everyone should be down on him.

You forgot ugly, lazy, and disrespectful

Shut up bitch and fix me a turkey pot pie.

This part of this conversation deserves a gold star.

:yay
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on April 21, 2007, 03:46:03 PM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on April 21, 2007, 12:58:23 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on April 21, 2007, 12:40:49 AM
you were in charlotte j?

Yeah, in 2003. When Kasay missed all those kicks. I think we tailgated right by your crew. Y'all had the Welcome to South Philly sign, right?

Good times down there. I was shteinfaced the night before. Bad. FF was on his game too, ask him all about it.

No thanks.  What happens in Charlotte stays in Charlotte.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Butchers Bill on April 21, 2007, 10:33:11 PM
Quote from: Jerome99RIP on April 21, 2007, 10:42:22 AM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on April 21, 2007, 09:56:14 AM
Quote from: Eagaholic on April 21, 2007, 09:47:01 AM
just because he fumbles alot, doesn't know the playbook, can't pick up the blitz, and got a concussion the first time he touched the ball, doesn't mean he everyone should be down on him.

You forgot ugly, lazy, and disrespectful

Shut up bitch and fix me a turkey pot pie.

Ha.  One of my fav movie characters of all time.

(http://www.the-means.com/images/juddnelson.jpg)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on April 22, 2007, 08:44:59 AM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on April 21, 2007, 12:58:23 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on April 21, 2007, 12:40:49 AM
you were in charlotte j?

Yeah, in 2003. When Kasay missed all those kicks. I think we tailgated right by your crew. Y'all had the Welcome to South Philly sign, right?

Good times down there. I was shteinfaced the night before. Bad. FF was on his game too, ask him all about it.

I get oddly fearless when drunk.  I was ready to throw down with that fruit wearing the inflatable Panthers helmet.  Little did I know at the time that my fellow balcony stormer (Die-Hard) was such a mean punching machine.

Please insert pic of Die-Hard punching Giants fan.


Oh, and I am the best dancer ever.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on April 22, 2007, 03:20:26 PM
Quote from: Jerome99RIP on April 21, 2007, 09:00:11 AM
From Spadaro's "Heckert Interview" article yesterday:

QuoteAnd Heckert is still high on Matt McCoy and he thinks that both Ryan Moats and Scott Young are ascending players.

Has anyone seen rjs yet this morning?  I think someone should check on him.

Sweet farging christ.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on April 23, 2007, 08:47:41 AM
"draft expert" chris steuber is going to be in studio with angelo in a couple minutes

cant wait to hear this clown
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on April 23, 2007, 08:49:22 AM
Hilarious.  Please post any of his genius insight worth mentioning.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhanInDC on April 23, 2007, 09:45:26 AM
PE.com:

QuoteNFLDraftPro.com's Chris Steuber says Rutgers' Brian Leonard is the best of this year's crop of fullbacks. Steuber offers some pre-draft predictions -- four honors that a player can earn at each position.

Expert.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on April 23, 2007, 10:12:31 AM
He probably does rate as the best fullback though Leonard wants to be a RB
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhanInDC on April 23, 2007, 10:37:19 AM
My point is the dude states things that anyone with an internet connection can figure out for themselves. He is you or I, with a website.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on April 23, 2007, 10:39:45 AM
Most definitely, and we'd be a better option. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on April 23, 2007, 10:47:43 AM
I think that Brian Leonard would be a great role player in the Eagles' offense. But I can see him doing a huge disappearing act if he gets picked up by a team with an offense that doesn't suit his skill set.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Butchers Bill on April 23, 2007, 11:09:06 AM
Quote from: Seabiscuit36 on April 23, 2007, 10:12:31 AM
He probably does rate as the best fullback though Leonard wants to be a RB

I want to be in Jessica Abla's ass right now.

The likelihood of that happening is about the same as Leonard making it as a featured RB in the NFL.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: DH on April 23, 2007, 01:37:08 PM
Quote from: Butchers Bill on April 23, 2007, 11:09:06 AM
Quote from: Seabiscuit36 on April 23, 2007, 10:12:31 AM
He probably does rate as the best fullback though Leonard wants to be a RB

I want to be in Jessica Abla's ass right now.

The likelihood of that happening is about the same as Leonard making it as a featured RB in the NFL.

Chances of you violating Albas cornhole = 0%
Chances of Leonard becoming a featured back = more than 0%
You = not good at math
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Butchers Bill on April 23, 2007, 01:43:41 PM
Quote from: Die-Hard on April 23, 2007, 01:37:08 PM

Chances of you violating Albas cornhole = 0%
Chances of Leonard becoming a featured back = more than 0%
You = not good at math

I did say "about" the same, and also said "making it" as a featured back.  Someone may very well try to make him a featured back, but it does not mean he will be successful.

Die Hard = sucks at reading comprehension   ;)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on April 23, 2007, 02:00:13 PM
Quote from: Butchers Bill on April 21, 2007, 10:33:11 PM
Ha.  One of my fav movie characters of all time.

(http://www.the-means.com/images/juddnelson.jpg)

DVD_TV on AMC can be educational.  I found out while watching "Ferris Bueller's Day Off" last night that Alan Ruck (still best known as Cameron in the aforementioned John Hughes movie) was actually slated to play Bender at first, when Hughes was planning on making the movie independently.

Also, Emilio Estevez turned down the role of Cameron.

Also, the difference between 0 and anything is significant.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on April 24, 2007, 12:05:19 AM
Update on the throwbacks:  apparently there was a topic in mid-December from an EMB poster saying these would be worn twice:

(http://www.onlinesports.com/images/mn-eag33d33k.gif)

Turns out he's an Eagles employee based on the IP address, so this looks legit...
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MDS on April 24, 2007, 01:54:59 AM
Twice? No.
Once? Sure.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on April 24, 2007, 06:29:22 AM
nonce yes

of course the only throwback i dont like gets rocked

this way with some blue and yellow lurie can still not acknowledge the eagles past as no one will associate these jerseys or colors with the birds and he gets to touch his inner hollywood so cal by going with ucla jerseys
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on April 24, 2007, 08:42:55 AM
QuoteReid may skip on his favorites
Eagles coach loves offensive linemen, but team has more pressing needs
By GEOFF MOSHER, The News Journal

Posted Tuesday, April 24, 2007

Joe Thomas: Outland Trophy winner

AP/REINHOLD MATAY
Joe Thomas and Levi Brown are two Andy Reid kind of guys -- big, athletic, physically gifted offensive linemen.

In other words, the Eagles coach's favorite type of football player.

Thomas and Brown wear the label of cornerstone left tackle, and are the preeminent prospects at what has become the NFL's preeminent lineman position.

Of course, both should be long gone before the Eagles pick 26th in Saturday's first round of the NFL draft.

In fact, this could become the first draft since 2001 that Reid surfs through the entire two-day affair without taking an offensive lineman.

"I can't imagine them taking one," said national scout Dan Shonka, general manager of Ourlads Scouting Services.

Shonka had high praise for Eagles offensive line coach Juan Castillo and for Castillo's power of persuasion on draft day, which is why he wouldn't rule out Reid nabbing a lineman later in the draft, even if the Eagles appear stockpiled at the position.

Castillo and Reid have teamed up to mine quality talent on the second day, Shonka said, citing 2005 fourth-round pick Todd Herremans, who moved from tackle to left guard in his second season, started all 16 games and earned a long-term contract extension.

"He [Castillo] saw something in Herremans," Shonka said, "and a lot of people didn't think he would be taken in the fourth round."

Since his first draft as Eagles coach in 1999, Reid has chosen offensive linemen more often than any other position -- 15 in total, most of them on the second day. Only one, right guard Shawn Andrews, was a first-round pick. Just three were picked in the first three rounds.

Reid has drafted nine offensive linemen in the past three years, leaving the Eagles deep at the position he often refers to as the most important unit of his team.

Veteran tackles William Thomas and Jon Runyan may not have much time left -- contracts for each expire in 2008. But 2006 second-round pick Winston Justice is viewed as Thomas' successor, with Andrews slated to replace Runyan at right tackle. At guard, the Eagles have 2006 third-round pick Max Jean-Gilles and Scott Young waiting in the wings.

That leaves center, where Jamaal Jackson is coming off an outstanding season but is backed up only by Nick Cole, who went undrafted last season and signed with the Eagles as a rookie free agent.

The Eagles probably wouldn't take a center on the first day to groom behind Jackson, who signed a seven-year extension just before training camp last July. So, don't hold your breath for USC's Ryan Kalil or Hawaii's Samson Satele, two prospects likely to be drafted Saturday.

If Reid decides he can't pass up the chance to tab another big guy for the offense, regardless of position, guards Ben Grubbs (Auburn) and Aaron Sears (Tennessee) are the cream of the crop.

Behind Thomas and Brown, Central Michigan's Joe Staley is considered the next-best tackle.

Some draft experts expect Thomas, from Wisconsin, to go No. 2 overall to Detroit. But Rob Rang, a senior analyst for nfldraftscout.com, said Penn State's Brown could end up becoming the better pro.

"I do know a couple of teams have him ranked higher [than Thomas]," Rang said. "I think Levi Brown has every chance to be a better pro than Joe Thomas."

Contact Geoff Mosher at gemosher@delawareonline.com.

TOP-RATED OFFENSIVE LINEMEN

Joe Thomas, T, Wisconsin: Behemoth tackle comes from a college program renowned for producing NFL linemen. We know Andy Reid would love to get his hands on Thomas, but the Eagles would have to trade way, way up to get him.


Levi Brown, T, Penn State: Considered every bit the physical specimen Thomas is, Brown could go anywhere in the top 15. Some have questioned Brown's desire.


Ryan Kalil, C, Southern California: The only center given first-round consideration, Kalil would be a nice fit with the Eagles, who need a backup to Jamaal Jackson. But someone else is likely to pick him early and make him a starter right away.


Ben Grubbs, G, Auburn: Flourished after moving from defensive tackle and should be the top guard off the board, but the Eagles are deep here. Then again, these are the lineman-loving Eagles ...


Joe Staley, T, Central Michigan: Great footwork stemming from his days at tight end. He should go late in the first round, but at another position where the Eagles are stacked. Again, though, these are the Eagles ...


Aaron Sears, G, Tennessee: Reid is enamored with guys like Sears, who played tackle and guard during his Rocky Top tenure.


Could look good in green


(Eagles select 26th overall)


Tony Ugoh, T, Arkansas


Samson Satele, C, Hawaii


Josh Beekman, G, Boston College


Ryan Harris, T, Notre Dame


Marshal Yanda, G, Iowa


Dan Mozes, C, West Virginia

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhanInDC on April 24, 2007, 09:00:58 AM
First day pick on the O-line = Irate.

On a related note, I have noticed that Joe Staley has been moving up draft boards, and seems to be solidly in the first round. On NFL Network last night, they re-aired the Senior Bowl. Staley got own repeatedly by just about any DE they put in front of him. Oh, and Adam Carriker is a farging manbeast.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on April 24, 2007, 09:08:20 AM
No. Irate is anyone mentioning Scott Young as a positive.

[beating a dead horse]
2007: Tra Thomas - Herremans - Jackson - Andrews - Runyan
(Scott Young at the bottom of the depth chart.)

2009: Herremans - Jean-Gilles - Jackson - Andrews - Justice
(Scott Young hocking real estate.)


farg Scott Young.
[/beating a dead horse]
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on April 24, 2007, 09:09:08 AM
Justice is the eventual LT
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on April 24, 2007, 09:24:57 AM
from the eagles website fanzone photos

(http://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/uploads/photos/perm/main/OCOJDFMFHEOA/IMG_2291_edited.jpg)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on April 24, 2007, 09:30:39 AM
who dat?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on April 24, 2007, 09:32:28 AM
someone who deserves AIDS
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on April 24, 2007, 09:57:17 AM
who dat?

some guy giving the finger on the eagle website fanzone
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhanInDC on April 24, 2007, 10:02:41 AM
Quote from: rjs246 on April 24, 2007, 09:08:20 AM
No. Irate is anyone mentioning Scott Young as a positive.

[beating a dead horse]
2007: Tra Thomas - Herremans - Jackson - Andrews - Runyan
(Scott Young at the bottom of the depth chart.)

2009: Herremans - Jean-Gilles - Jackson - Andrews - Justice
(Scott Young hocking real estate.)


farg Scott Young.
[/beating a dead horse]


That talk of moving Andrews to tackle always makes me angry too. The guy is a developing into the most dominant guard in the league......hey, let's change his postion! Manneans showed real promise when he filled in at tackle a couple of years ago, I would prefer it be as RJS stated, Herremans - Jean-Gilles - Jackson - Andrews - Justice.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on April 24, 2007, 10:07:18 AM
the only way andrews goes to tackle is if the eagles missed on herremans and justice...because if they did who else is gonna play out there when runyan and thomas are done...which is essentially gonna happen at the same time
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on April 24, 2007, 10:12:02 AM
Herremans has already exceeded his draft status with his play in the last two years.  I think he's definitely better-suited for RT, though... because his feet just aren't quick enough for the blind side.  Justice was drafted to be the LT after Thomas due to his uncanny athleticism, and obviously we won't know for a while yet if the pick was a hit.

The inner 3 of the line better damn well be Jean-Gilles, Jackson, and Andrews, though, once Thomas and Runyan are out of the picture.  That's a lot of meat.  If MJG can't step in and play, that would be a miss.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on April 24, 2007, 10:27:23 AM
Herremans has already exceeded his draft status with his play in the last two years.

only if they drafted him as a guard

if he goes to T one day and sucks they missed on him...and by missed im not just talking about the pick but their evaluation of him since theyve had him
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on April 24, 2007, 10:42:19 AM
He was damn impressive as a rookie LT until he broke his fibula.  The following year to switch a position he's played for the past 5 years at least and move into the G position and excel, he was a great value pick.  Manneans will be best suited at RT i think though mainly due to footwork. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on April 24, 2007, 10:55:29 AM
he was a great value pick

hes a good pick period if he stays at guard and does well or goes to tackle and does well there...4th rounders arent value picks imo...you should periodically hit on picks like that

all im saying is if he moves to tackle and sucks and they are forced to move andrews outside then they missed big on herremans...thats a lot of ifs tho...hell it could be that they have no intention of ever moving him outside
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyandBCEagles on April 24, 2007, 11:58:00 PM
I agree, Justice at LT, manneans at RT.  Justice-MJG-Jackson-Andrews-Herremans.  Ain't nothing wrong with that.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhanInDC on April 25, 2007, 09:38:05 AM
Don Banks:
Quote
Jarvis Moss becomes the new Jevon Kearse: Nobody has yet dubbed Moss "The Freak,'' but the Gators defensive end is a tall and athletically gifted pass rusher with top-end speed and the ability to turn the corner and close on a quarterback? Who does that sound like? If you said a young Kearse, circa 1999 when he came to the NFL as a star defensive end out of Florida and helped Tennessee get to the Super Bowl, you're paying attention.

The irony is obvious. Kearse's season-ending knee injury last year in Philadelphia might give the Eagles reason to go shopping in the first round for fresh blood at defensive end. Some think Moss won't last until the Eagles' No. 26 pick, but we do. Like Kearse, he's had trouble staying healthy in his college career, and the Eagles would want to add a little weight to his 6-6, 250-pound frame. But his arrival in Philly could mean trouble of sorts for Kearse.

Quote
Positives: Has a tall, lanky frame with broad shoulders, tight waist and good bubble ... Moves very well coming off the edge and will bring immediate value in third-down passing situations ... Shows above-average balance and flexibility on the move and has explosive acceleration in backside pursuit ... Fluid and flexible athlete with very crisp change of direction agility ... Makes quick reads and reacts with good urgency once he locates the ball ... Despite limited reps until 2006, it is rare to see him get faked out ... Learns with normal reps and is a self-starter who puts in the extra hours after practice ... Plays with good aggression, but is best when he avoids or slips past blocks rather than trying to engage the offensive lineman (lacks the bulk and strength to control) ... Moves well off the line, getting his best production when he beats the offensive tackle coming out of his stance ... His outstanding burst off the snap allows him to gain advantage, especially when coming off the edge ... His initial step lets him beat the offensive tackle to the spot and he has that extra gear to run by them ... High energy type who closes on the ball with good pad level ... Defeats blocks with quickness rather than power ... When he gets a free lane, he has the ability to knife through and penetrate the line ... Has very good lateral movement in pursuit and is an explosive form tackler when closing on the quarterback ... Has the speed to give chase along the perimeter and good ability to sift out the ball in a pile (four forced fumbles in 2006) ... Shows very good hip snap and adequate wrap-up technique, using his long reach to make good arm tackles ... What he does best is explode off the edge and generate pressure on the pocket ... If not accounted for, he will sack the quarterback due to his speed and pad level (has excellent hip wiggle and shake to juke).

Negatives: Still trying to recover the strength and bulk that he lost while battling his pelvis injury ... Needs to add at least another 20 pounds to his frame to prevent blockers from walling him off when trying to work in-line ... Must keep his hands active, especially vs. low blocks, as he tends to get taken off his feet too much trying to slip through trash (does not protect his legs on the move) ... Plays too high on the move and this causes him to struggle in attempts to squeeze down the rush lane, and will get washed out when he tries to split double teams ... More effective playing off the edge, as he lacks the raw power to defeat blocks when lining head up on an opponent ... Struggles to disengage when working over the middle, as he is easily defeated vs. face-up blockers ... Has good flexibility, but for some reason his hips sink and his feet die when blockers get their hands into his body ... Lacks the hand strength to jerk and pull down the offensive lineman (must improve his rip and club moves, but has an efficient swim move) ... His three-year struggle with a staph infection in his pelvic bone needs further medical evaluation ... The school will not discuss suspensions, but there is a need to challenge the player on the reason he was suspended for the 2006 Western Carolina game.

Compares To: Simeon Rice, Tampa Bay ... Some experts compare him to Jevon Kearse, but while Moss has Kearse-like quickness he lacks the bulk and upper-body strength to defeat face-up blockers. Moss could possible move to outside linebacker in a 3-4 alignment, but at least brings instant value in third-down passing situations, where he can do what he does best -- penetrate off the edge to disrupt the pocket.

Video: http://broadcast.organicframework.com/p/FOX-Sports-NFL-Draft-Preview-Jarvis-Moss___425,109021.html

If they go D-Line in the first, I guess I'd be okay with Moss compared to who is projected to be there (i.e. Anthony Spencer).
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: DH on April 25, 2007, 09:51:13 AM
EAGLES TO UNVEIL PLANS FOR 75TH ANNIVERSARY PROGRAM


Eagles officials today will announce plans for a 75th anniversary program during the upcoming season that will include the donning of blue and yellow throwback uniforms from the team's inaugural year during a regular-season game.  The Eagles will wear a special patch for all games.  The program will also include a fan vote for their favorites at all 22 positions, plus punter, kicker, special teams and coach.

(http://www.sportsbusinessdaily.com/images/articles/TDI20070425MB-06.jpg)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: phattymatty on April 25, 2007, 09:55:03 AM
gay.  the only reason they're not doing the kelly green is because people can and do already buy those jerseys.  by using the ugly light blue and yellow ones, they have am entire new source of income.  which is farged up and i'll probably get one.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on April 25, 2007, 10:26:34 AM
gay.  the only reason they're not doing the kelly green is because people can and do already buy those jerseys.  by using the ugly light blue and yellow ones, they have am entire new source of income.  which is farged up and i'll probably get one.

i agree gay...but its not money...the kelly green and other green throwbacks are hardly widely available...if they were to come out with those in stores like modells or sports authority and have them at replica prices it would be a virtual goldmine

the fact of the matter is lurie/banner absolutely refuse to recognize that the eagles existed before their reign...they are only even doing any of the 75 year stuff because its mandated by the league....and its no coincidence that the jersey they are choosing to go with is a jersey that is as much non eagle as humanly possible

even look at the retarded 75 year logo they came up with...a big fat new eagle head celebrating the history of the league and team??...wtf
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: phattymatty on April 25, 2007, 10:31:40 AM
i can't imagine the reasoning behind that logo. 

"let's take our current logo and put a grey circle behind it.  oh, and then the number 75.  sweet."  *high five*
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Wingspan on April 25, 2007, 11:01:31 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on April 25, 2007, 10:26:34 AM
i agree gay...but its not money...the kelly green and other green throwbacks are hardly widely available...if they were to come out with those in stores like modells or sports authority and have them at replica prices it would be a virtual goldmine

Um...those exist.

You can walk into any Modells or Sports Authority now and get those. I know, I bought a kelly green mike quick last season. It was $72
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on April 25, 2007, 11:12:09 AM
ill take your word for it...ive never seen them in a models or a chain store...and the few times i have they were $150...and you cant get them at modells online for example...which is what i mean by "widely available"
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Father Demon on April 25, 2007, 11:14:33 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on April 25, 2007, 10:26:34 AM
the fact of the matter is lurie/banner absolutely refuse to recognize that the eagles existed before their reign...

That is utter malarkey.

The logo is dumb, though...  it appears as if it was done with no thought.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: DH on April 25, 2007, 11:33:49 AM
Gross...

(http://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/uploads/photos/perm/main/CFEOFJOHPJAG/mcnabb_throwjersey_070425.jpg)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on April 25, 2007, 11:38:26 AM
I like the logo, but then again I am one of the few who dig the newer logo. I don't like the yellow/blue shtein though. But it makes sense to go back to the first jerseys the franchise ever wore. Kelly greens would be tight, but they were recent. The same argument for them not going back to the white helmets, or the uni's they wore in 1980, or even the ones in the 1960's.

And yes, Modells (and Foot Locker, SA, Dicks) all have Kelly Green's on sale. I saw a Randall and Reggie in Foot Locker the other day.

I want to get myself another 1994 Eric Allen white w/ the 75th anniversary NFL logo patch. I had one of those back in the day and loved it. Eric Allen is on my top 5 favorite all time.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Wingspan on April 25, 2007, 11:39:36 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on April 25, 2007, 11:12:09 AM
ill take your word for it...ive never seen them in a models or a chain store...and the few times i have they were $150...and you cant get them at modells online for example...which is what i mean by "widely available"

They are on amazon now for 125

Just search anywhere for Reebok Gridiron Classic. They are all over the place during the season. Hell my wife bought my carmichael jersey at friggin Sears
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on April 25, 2007, 11:40:47 AM
This will blow IGY's mind, Went to Kohls back in december, they had a Randall Kelly Green throwback there. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on April 25, 2007, 11:41:24 AM
Quote from: Die-Hard on April 25, 2007, 11:33:49 AM
Gross...

I think it's awesome in its grossness.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on April 25, 2007, 11:50:17 AM
They are on amazon now for 125

Just search anywhere for Reebok Gridiron Classic. They are all over the place during the season. Hell my wife bought my carmichael jersey at friggin Sears



im not saying you cant get kelly green jerseys...i have ten of them...im saying they are not available for the replica jersey price....125 is double the price what you can get replicas for....and the kelly greens are not widely available in general....for example they dont exist on nfl.com...if you dont live in philly you cant walk into a store and get one...which goes back to my initial point being that it has nothing to do with money as to why the eagles are going with ucla jerseys vs kelly green jerseys or 1980 jerseys or 1950 jerseys...because if the eagles wanted to make money theyd either straight up switch to an older jersey like the giants and jets did....or theyd make the throwbacks plentiful EVERYWHERE and cheap like their current jerseys are
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on April 25, 2007, 11:51:31 AM
This will blow IGY's mind, Went to Kohls back in december, they had a Randall Kelly Green throwback there. 

you guys are completely missing the point...to understand go back to what me and matty were orginally discussing
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on April 25, 2007, 11:53:47 AM
The money thing doesn't really ring true either, IMO. Any officially licensed NFL product goes into the NFL and NFLPA pot. Jon Runyan talked about this before and he said that if someone buys a Cowboys jersey, the players see money from it because of licensing. So it sounds to me that regardless of which team sells the most stuff, the money is divided up equally. So I doubt Lurie and Banner would make extra off of the truckloads of KG's that would sell if they made them easier to buy in other parts of the country.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on April 25, 2007, 11:54:03 AM
(http://shop.philadelphiaeagles.com/images/products/largeimages/75-303L.jpg)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Father Demon on April 25, 2007, 12:03:33 PM
I'm actually kinda digging on that hat, but I'm not liking the jerseys...
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: bobbyinlondon on April 25, 2007, 12:19:46 PM
If I'm not mistaken, this was the same uniform they wore during the NFL's 75th year commemoration, in 1994, when they played the Packers. I only saw highlights of the game, because they hadn't started broadcasting the games on a regular basis here, but I remember thinking those helmets were just beyond ugly.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on April 25, 2007, 12:21:19 PM
I actually do like that hat, its getting added to the collection
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Wingspan on April 25, 2007, 12:28:17 PM
Quote from: bobbyinlondon on April 25, 2007, 12:19:46 PM
If I'm not mistaken, this was the same uniform they wore during the NFL's 75th year commemoration, in 1994, when they played the Packers. I only saw highlights of the game, because they hadn't started broadcasting the games on a regular basis here, but I remember thinking those helmets were just beyond ugly.

Those uniforms were green. The helmets were green and grey with no wings at all. I think they were the 40's and 50's unis.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: phattymatty on April 25, 2007, 12:29:59 PM
sweet, hats with pictures of helmets on them.

then maybe we can all get shirts with pictures of eagles jerseys on them.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: mussa on April 25, 2007, 12:31:24 PM
more money for the eagles
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on April 25, 2007, 12:40:52 PM
sweet, hats with pictures of helmets on them.

then maybe we can all get shirts with pictures of eagles jerseys on them.


ha

the whole thing is a train wreck...why dont we all just buy ucla hats and jerseys...they look cooler and are about as much eagle as these things

(http://ec3.images-amazon.com/images/P/B000FFAI6G.01-A2Q41P19X5JJI._AA280_SCLZZZZZZZ_V66928571_.jpg)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on April 25, 2007, 12:45:30 PM
Quote from: phattymatty on April 25, 2007, 09:55:03 AM
gay.  the only reason they're not doing the kelly green is because people can and do already buy those jerseys.  by using the ugly light blue and yellow ones, they have am entire new source of income.  which is farged up and i'll probably get one.

:-D

Not me.  I'm drawing the line here.  Those yellow and blue things are farging seizure-inducing in their awfulness.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on April 25, 2007, 12:48:02 PM
Those jersey's are awful, but I appreciate the wearing of them for 1 game. Sept. 23rd vs. the Lions is the game they'll be worn. Joy.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: phattymatty on April 25, 2007, 12:52:04 PM
holla

(http://www.lincolnfinancialfield.com/uploads/photos/perm/main/PNAPNMJHPJAG/enews-main-070425.jpg)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on April 25, 2007, 12:53:42 PM
I actually kind of like the hat that Jevon's wearing.

patch on jerseys:
(http://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/uploads/photos/perm/main/NLCINLLHPJAG/75thPC_4.jpg)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on April 25, 2007, 01:04:53 PM
(http://www.lincolnfinancialfield.com/uploads/photos/perm/main/PNAPNMJHPJAG/enews-main-070425.jpg)



oh my


anyone want my lion tickets
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on April 25, 2007, 01:08:18 PM
Sure.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on April 25, 2007, 01:10:02 PM
Quote from: bobbyinlondon on April 25, 2007, 12:19:46 PM
If I'm not mistaken, this was the same uniform they wore during the NFL's 75th year commemoration, in 1994, when they played the Packers. I only saw highlights of the game, because they hadn't started broadcasting the games on a regular basis here, but I remember thinking those helmets were just beyond ugly.

Green Bay's uniforms were navy blue and yellow with tan pants.  The Eagles wore white with green pants.  The helmet was green with a ridiculously thick gray stripe
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on April 25, 2007, 01:13:04 PM
Detroits old school uni's were the shtein. The ones they wore alot on Thanksgiving. Just plain blue and silver.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on April 25, 2007, 01:45:47 PM
those were great phreak....i loved the socks on them
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Dillen on April 25, 2007, 02:13:27 PM
Those are farging hideous.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MDS on April 25, 2007, 02:31:22 PM
Yuck. I stand corrected. Kelly green or bust.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on April 25, 2007, 02:37:20 PM
If you ladies are done talking about fashion can we get back to bickering about which college kids we'dlike the team to draft? Thanks.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Geowhizzer on April 25, 2007, 02:46:45 PM
I can understanding wanting to get back to the roots to celebrate.'

But my goodness, those things are butt-ugly.  :-D
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MDS on April 25, 2007, 02:53:25 PM
Quote from: rjs246 on April 25, 2007, 02:37:20 PM
If you ladies are done talking about fashion can we get back to bickering about which college kids we'dlike the team to draft? Thanks.

I'd like you to draft a pair of testicles.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on April 25, 2007, 02:55:06 PM
I've got a beanbag that would make you wish you were a woman.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MDS on April 25, 2007, 03:04:33 PM
Liar.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: General_Failure on April 25, 2007, 03:34:39 PM
Oh god, that's awful. Anyone buying that crap should be shot.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on April 25, 2007, 03:47:45 PM
Oh god, that's awful. Anyone buying that crap should be shot.

i cant imagine one person will even buy it...can you see rockin a shiny metallic yellow and blue jersey into a bar full of green clad eagle fans or to a game at the linc...god youd look like a douche

it doesnt make it any better but i suppose some people will do it this year cause its "in"...but what are you gonna do with it in a year or two or three from now

i cant believe they are really going thru with it....the team is actually going to wear them in a real game

how surreal is it gonna be at the detroit game with a stadium full of green eagle fans cheering on the ucla bruins...maybe bring freddie mitchell back for that game
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Dillen on April 25, 2007, 04:10:55 PM
And Matt Ware.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on April 25, 2007, 04:12:17 PM
and bruce walker
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on April 25, 2007, 04:12:21 PM
Those jerseys are hot. I like em. Def gonna get myself a jersey.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhanInDC on April 25, 2007, 06:00:22 PM
Surprise.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: General_Failure on April 25, 2007, 06:44:45 PM
Nobody is.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Cerevant on April 26, 2007, 08:53:52 AM
Quote from: rjs246 on April 25, 2007, 02:55:06 PM
I've got a beanbag that would make you wish you were a woman.

Quote from: General_Failure on April 25, 2007, 03:34:39 PM
Oh god, that's awful. Anyone buying that crap should be shot.

I agree.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on April 26, 2007, 08:57:51 AM
Windsail, dude. Windsail.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on April 26, 2007, 10:19:09 AM
Phatty and rjs have a deal... if phatty continues to back up rjs's claims about having a scrotum the size of a freezer bag, rjs will say that phatty can piss from one side of the street to another.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on April 26, 2007, 10:32:44 AM
That's not true. The deal it TOTALLY different than that. It involves a competition to see who can choke you to death first. Me with my hairy brain or Matt with his firehose of piss. We've been plotting it for months.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on April 26, 2007, 10:35:46 AM
That's sweet of you, but Scott Young and Chris Steuber are my personal bodyguards.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on April 26, 2007, 01:34:14 PM
This thread has (http://smilies.xibase.com/suicide.gif) written all over it...
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on April 27, 2007, 07:45:21 AM
Quote from: King Cole on April 25, 2007, 04:12:21 PM
Those jerseys are hot. I like em. Def gonna get myself a jersey.

Shocker.



Those jerseys are farging hideous.  The hats are tight though.  I could rock one of those on top of a regular outfit.



I gotta say though... it's too tough to relate to those jerseys without some kind of green in them.  I mean, yeah... they started out yellow/blue but they've been some sort of green for more than 60 of those 75 years.  These jerseys honor the beginning of the Eagles... not the history.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on April 27, 2007, 08:20:42 AM
i'm with you Feva on the hats.  They would go nicely with a white polo.  But the jersey's are just ridiculous goofy.  All the fans want is Kelly Green back and we get this
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: hbionic on April 27, 2007, 12:11:17 PM
Apparently, this is not a good time to bring up leather pants.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Beermonkey on April 27, 2007, 02:49:51 PM
Quote from: EagleFeva on April 27, 2007, 07:45:21 AM
The hats are tight though.  I could rock one of those on top of a regular outfit.

You could probably pull that off, those hats on some pudgy white guy, not so much.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on April 27, 2007, 03:03:17 PM
Quote from: Beermonkey on April 27, 2007, 02:49:51 PM
Quote from: EagleFeva on April 27, 2007, 07:45:21 AM
The hats are tight though.  I could rock one of those on top of a regular outfit.

You could probably pull that off, those hats on some pudgy white guy, not so much.

OMGRACIST
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Beermonkey on April 27, 2007, 04:44:02 PM
Quote from: FastFreddie on April 27, 2007, 03:03:17 PM
Quote from: Beermonkey on April 27, 2007, 02:49:51 PM
Quote from: EagleFeva on April 27, 2007, 07:45:21 AM
The hats are tight though.  I could rock one of those on top of a regular outfit.

You could probably pull that off, those hats on some pudgy white guy, not so much.

OMGRACIST

Yellow/Powder Blue would bring out the pastiness of your average caucasian. The same reason why I never wear my electric blue suit anymore.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: General_Failure on April 27, 2007, 07:00:54 PM
Well, that and nobody's inviting you to the prom.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on April 28, 2007, 12:50:33 AM
Quote from: FastFreddie on April 27, 2007, 03:03:17 PM
Quote from: Beermonkey on April 27, 2007, 02:49:51 PM
Quote from: EagleFeva on April 27, 2007, 07:45:21 AM
The hats are tight though.  I could rock one of those on top of a regular outfit.

You could probably pull that off, those hats on some pudgy white guy, not so much.

OMGRACIST

Not so much racist... just that I'm a good lookin' motherfarger who looks good in whatever he decides to wear.

Quote from: Beermonkey on April 27, 2007, 04:44:02 PM
Yellow/Powder Blue would bring out the pastiness of your average caucasian. The same reason why I never wear my electric blue suit anymore.

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b286/acedude9/dumb20and20dumber20tux.jpg)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Munson on April 30, 2007, 04:39:24 AM
Hah.

So apparently Kearse, Lito, Juqua, and AJ were down in Newark partying yesterday at ChapelFest. It's an all day party on the UD campus....I heard Feeley was so drunk he was stumbling down the street leaning on houses, and Lito refused to talk Eagles with anyone and was "just there to get his party on".

The one farging weekend I decide not to drink in Newark....fargers.
Title: 2007 offseason thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on May 02, 2007, 11:17:00 PM
nm
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on May 03, 2007, 11:44:33 AM
greg richmond cut today
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on May 03, 2007, 11:48:31 AM
LBs are dropping like flies
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on May 03, 2007, 11:49:30 AM
at least his back is really, really strong now
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on May 03, 2007, 11:52:11 AM
so they cut a black guy in favor of a white guy
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhanInDC on May 03, 2007, 11:59:48 AM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on May 03, 2007, 11:52:11 AM
so they cut a black guy in favor of a white guy

No, they cut Dhani too.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on May 03, 2007, 12:56:30 PM
QuoteLB Richmond Among 3 Players Released

Also on Thursday, the Eagles announced the release of linebacker Greg Richmond, running back Antoine Bagwell and quarterback Jeff Mroz. All three players signed with the Eagles on Jan. 23, 2007. Richmond re-signed after finishing the 2006 season on the team's practice squad.

The draft weekend additions of quarterback Kevin Kolb, running backs Tony Hunt and Nate Ilaoa and linebacker Stewart Bradley likely prompted the roster moves.

Kolb > Mroz
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on May 04, 2007, 07:45:43 AM
Yesterday was my birthday, my parents and my brother got me a Dawkins Jersey, the new one  :paranoid.  Apparently the Eagles wont mail it, have it made until Sept. 15th?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on May 04, 2007, 08:07:44 AM
Pay now wait five months to redeem.  Are you sure they didn't buy you season tickets instead?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on May 04, 2007, 08:16:13 AM
I wish Romey, I wish.  Ive been on the waiting list for years, im pretty sure one day I'll get my season tickets  :-D
I felt kind of bad though, my parents and brother were all excited for the new jersey, and i was kind of like blah.  Either way though, its a one shot deal for those this year, its a dawk so it will be a classic. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on May 06, 2007, 06:11:03 PM
Spadaro seems to be hinting in his latest column that Bartrum will announce his retirement this week
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on May 06, 2007, 07:14:45 PM
i thought that was a forgone conclusion
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on May 07, 2007, 06:45:26 AM
I thought his injury pretty much guaranteed he was done?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on May 07, 2007, 07:14:39 AM
Stooober in da house?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: General_Failure on May 07, 2007, 07:20:56 AM
He wasn't already retired?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on May 07, 2007, 06:07:47 PM
I don't think anyone expected him to return but he never made it official, which is what might happen this week...

Supposedly there's a rumor floating of Rayburn to Houston for a late-round pick...
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on May 07, 2007, 06:36:43 PM
Quote from: BigEd76 on May 07, 2007, 06:07:47 PM

Supposedly there's a rumor floating of Rayburn to Houston for a late-round pick...

Steal

Houston's dumb, if they can't get something decent for next season I don't mind it when they get picks in 2 or 3 years like they did with Feeley and some of the minor deals they did during last years draft. Whatever happend to Jeremy Schlecta, I don't see him on their roster.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on May 07, 2007, 07:10:15 PM
Dawkins will be on NFL Network Total Access at some point in the next 30 minutes

They're discussing the NFC East's overall draft now
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on May 07, 2007, 10:23:15 PM
Ha! Jeremy Schlecta.

Truck Driver can join ND Kalu down there.

Eagles who have played for HOU:

Kalu
Schlecta
Ryan Schau
Matt Stevens
Jeff Posey
Gaffney
Steve Martin
Dexter Wynn

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on May 07, 2007, 10:25:58 PM
So what did Dawk Say?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on May 07, 2007, 10:40:18 PM
Eisen: Why would the Eagles take a QB?

Wilcots: This team is insecure when it comes to McNabb's ability to stay healthy. Kolb is a guy Reid can groom as insurance in case McNabb keeps getting hurt

Eisen: Why at #36 though?

Wilcots: Hey, they liked the guy

======================================================================

Dawk interview:

On the Kolb pick: "The only people that weren't surprised were the people in the war room making the selection."

Talked to McNabb....it surprised him but it surprised everyone else too.....don't want to think about negative stuff or speculation.....just concentrate on the present and getting healthy....If Kolb contributes it'll be 2 or 3 years down the line...

Expects McNabb to be back 100%

Wilcots brings up the addition of Spikes....Dawk goes nuts..."TKO!"...starts clapping, says he's so jacked up to have him here....might hyperventilate celebrating good plays with him  ;D ...."You don't know how excited I was to get that CAT on this team!"

Says he also likes the "PLETHORA" of new defensive linemen added up front

Gaddis is "very athletic....new to the position so he's raw and green, but has a tremendous upside"....can't wait to teach him....gonna help immediately on special teams...gonna be productive.....he comes from "the REAL orange" of Clemson

On the recent player conduct stuff.....says that the commissioner had to put a system in place but it's not something that anyone should be patting themselves on the back about....says teams aren't going to tolerate the off-the-field crap anymore (talking about Carroll's release)....says it's a privilege to play in the NFL and it shouldn't be taken for granted....says he likes that teams are straightforward with punishments now....
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on May 08, 2007, 08:10:20 AM
Dawk's so excited because he can play like a safety and not like a 4th LB this season (hopefully)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on May 08, 2007, 08:55:29 AM
i love that Dawk is excited to teach a young player
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on May 08, 2007, 09:01:27 AM
Quote from: SunMo on May 08, 2007, 08:55:29 AM
i love that Dawk is excited to teach a young player

Word.  Gaddis needs to get into camp 1st and then right into Dawkins' hip pocket and learn everything he can.  Even if he (probably) won't have the same athleticism... he can at least have that same mentality.

Gaddis needs to get in touch with his inner "idiot-man".
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on May 08, 2007, 10:53:29 AM
If anyone ever wears #20 for the Eagles again after Dawkins, the front office should napalmed.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on May 08, 2007, 11:04:30 AM
settle down...dawk should not have his number retired...hes the best eagle safety ever hes nowhere near the best saftey of all time nor is he a superbowl winner

if you retire dawk then you retire mike quick and seth joyner and eric allen ect...and altho i love many of these guys they are not retired jersey material

and just the mere fact that dawk played with the eagles his whole career and these other guys didnt isnt reason enough to do something as huge as retiring a number

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on May 08, 2007, 11:04:51 AM
I hope Jeremy Bloom gets #20.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on May 08, 2007, 11:08:24 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on May 08, 2007, 11:04:30 AM
settle down...dawk should not have his number retired...hes the best eagle safety ever hes nowhere near the best saftey of all time nor is he a superbowl winner

if you retire dawk then you retire mike quick and seth joyner and eric allen ect...and altho i love many of these guys they are not retired jersey material

and just the mere fact that dawk played with the eagles his whole career and these other guys didnt isnt reason enough to do something as huge as retiring a number

You'll change your tune when Barksdale retires.

Quote from: rjs246 on May 08, 2007, 11:04:51 AM
I hope Jeremy Bloom gets #20.

He can't!  He has 11 because it looks like skis!  Get it?  He was a skier, so he wears number ELEVEN!!11
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on May 08, 2007, 11:19:58 AM
i should add that if dawk makes the hof....which he wont do...then im for retiring the number

same with allen...who i think has a much better and realistic shot
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: mussa on May 08, 2007, 12:05:05 PM
hater
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on May 08, 2007, 12:12:26 PM
Dawkins def. deserves to have his number retired.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: General_Failure on May 08, 2007, 12:16:47 PM
At the very least, he's getting a Harley at midfield.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on May 08, 2007, 12:16:52 PM
Dawk will have his number retired guaranteed.  Lurie loves him and he's been the heart and soul of that unit for the better part of a decade now.

To quote wolfboy, it's a stone cold mortal lock.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on May 08, 2007, 12:17:24 PM
i think youre confusing the eagles honor roll which contains the likes of carmichael....bergey...van brocklin...jaworski...montgomery ect...

vs

actual retired numbers

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on May 08, 2007, 12:21:36 PM
The Eagles have only retired seven numbers: 15, 40, 44, 60, 70, 92 & 99.

#20 will be the eighth.  Mark it down.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on May 08, 2007, 12:21:53 PM
Quote from: General_Failure on May 08, 2007, 12:16:47 PM
At the very least, he's getting a Harley at midfield.

The empty golf club bag is better.

Randall's number is unofficially retired as was Reggie's until 2005. The last to wear #12 was Travis Brown in camp. And like with Reggie's number, Lurie told the equipment guys to not issue it again.

Dawk's will be retired. No one will wear 20 after him. Bet.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on May 08, 2007, 12:23:00 PM
Quote from: General_Failure on May 08, 2007, 12:16:47 PM
At the very least, he's getting a Harley at midfield.

The empty golf club bag is better.

Randall's number is unofficially retired as was Reggie's until 2005. The last to wear #12 was Travis Brown in camp. And like with Reggie's number, Lurie told the equipment guys to not issue it again.

Dawk's will be retired. No one will wear 20 after him. Bet.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on May 08, 2007, 12:25:11 PM
Arguing Dawk's merits is one thing.  Arguing whether his number will be retired is another.  It's gonna happen because Lurie loves him and even began advocating his HOF last year at Reggie's induction.

If he's pimping Dawk for Canton, in what possible way couldn't he have his number retired by the Birds?

It's a lock.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: General_Failure on May 08, 2007, 12:28:20 PM
Lurie will retire it if and when Dawk gets to Canton, and not a moment sooner.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on May 08, 2007, 12:38:54 PM
im not saying it wont happen im saying it shouldnt happen

but also how does lurie retire dawk and not mcnabb...they love donovan as much if not more than dawk...and an argument can certainly be made that mcnabb has been better at his position than dawk has at is


Lurie will retire it if and when Dawk gets to Canton, and not a moment sooner

then its not happening...dawk is simply not a HOF....his position alone makes it almost impossible...

theres less than ten safties in the HOF in the 75 years of the league

1981 was the last time a safety who made the hall entered the league

his statistics dont measure up either....he also isnt nearly as well thought of around the nfl as he is in philly...thats not to say anyone doesnt think hes a great safety...but theres a huge leap to go from great player to HOF player




Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on May 08, 2007, 12:40:32 PM
I'm going to go ahead and ignore the opinion of someone that thinks Sean Taylor is easily a better player than Dawkins is.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on May 08, 2007, 12:44:46 PM
you can certainly ignore if you choose...once again im here to drop direction on the domes of the misled...you can choose to listen or you can continue to wander aimlessly

that is mos def your perogotive
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on May 08, 2007, 01:51:14 PM
Safeties historically have had a harder time gaining entrance to the HOF because the position was looked down upon in terms of importance. 

Now it's a different story.  Guys like Ed Reed, Troy Polamalu & Dawkins have elevated the position to the point where it can be one of the most important on the field.

I read somewhere that he's one of only 10 players to have recorded 15 sacks & 30 interceptions in his career and his career isn't even over yet.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: phattymatty on May 08, 2007, 02:19:02 PM
Quote from: BigEd76 on May 07, 2007, 10:40:18 PM
Eisen: Why would the Eagles take a QB?

Wilcots: This team is insecure when it comes to McNabb's ability to stay healthy. Kolb is a guy Reid can groom as insurance in case McNabb keeps getting hurt

Eisen: Why at #36 though?

Wilcots: Hey, they liked the guy

======================================================================

Dawk interview:

On the Kolb pick: "The only people that weren't surprised were the people in the war room making the selection."

Talked to McNabb....it surprised him but it surprised everyone else too.....don't want to think about negative stuff or speculation.....just concentrate on the present and getting healthy....If Kolb contributes it'll be 2 or 3 years down the line...

Expects McNabb to be back 100%

Wilcots brings up the addition of Spikes....Dawk goes nuts..."TKO!"...starts clapping, says he's so jacked up to have him here....might hyperventilate celebrating good plays with him  ;D ...."You don't know how excited I was to get that CAT on this team!"

Says he also likes the "PLETHORA" of new defensive linemen added up front

Gaddis is "very athletic....new to the position so he's raw and green, but has a tremendous upside"....can't wait to teach him....gonna help immediately on special teams...gonna be productive.....he comes from "the REAL orange" of Clemson

On the recent player conduct stuff.....says that the commissioner had to put a system in place but it's not something that anyone should be patting themselves on the back about....says teams aren't going to tolerate the off-the-field crap anymore (talking about Carroll's release)....says it's a privilege to play in the NFL and it shouldn't be taken for granted....says he likes that teams are straightforward with punishments now....


when you post these, do you:

a) find a transcript somewhere and copy and paste from it

b) just write whatever you remember hearing, or

c) tape record the interview and then type back what was said word-for-word


i really hope it's c.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on May 08, 2007, 02:41:33 PM
Its really d), Ed sends Eisen pics of himself in a bikini and Eisen sends him the transcripts
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on May 08, 2007, 02:57:18 PM
I read somewhere that he's one of only 10 players to have recorded 15 sacks & 30 interceptions in his career

im just saying both rodney harrison and leroy butler have more sacks and interceptions than dawk plus championships....pretty sure they all arent getting in

john lynch wes hopkins carnell lake and joey browner among some others have similar numbers to dawk

dawk = great player but not HOF'er
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on May 08, 2007, 03:15:05 PM
nm.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on May 08, 2007, 03:21:48 PM
Quote from: phattymatty on May 08, 2007, 02:19:02 PM
when you post these, do you:

a) find a transcript somewhere and copy and paste from it

b) just write whatever you remember hearing, or

c) tape record the interview and then type back what was said word-for-word

i really hope it's c.

Definitely C.  Dawk used smilies and CAPS too.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: mussa on May 08, 2007, 03:22:07 PM
apparently he's not black enough
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on May 08, 2007, 03:24:20 PM
He's whiter than igy
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on May 08, 2007, 03:28:02 PM
Quote from: Father Demon on May 08, 2007, 03:23:35 PM
I heard McNabb thinks IGY is a whiner.

Quote from: BigEd76 on May 08, 2007, 03:24:20 PM
He's whiter than igy
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on May 08, 2007, 03:29:09 PM
E'rbody loves IGY.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on May 08, 2007, 03:31:36 PM
Quote from: BigEd76 on May 08, 2007, 03:24:20 PM
He's whiter than igy
"IGY makes black people look like Bryant Gumble"
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on May 08, 2007, 03:33:35 PM
i get chicks that make toni braxton look like whoopie
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on May 08, 2007, 03:34:37 PM
btches love the butta johnson
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on May 08, 2007, 03:39:39 PM
Quote from: BigEd76 on May 08, 2007, 03:34:37 PM
btches love the butta johnson

or even the johnson butta - skeet skeet
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on May 08, 2007, 03:42:13 PM
btches love the butta johnson

speak that science son
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on May 08, 2007, 03:45:50 PM
He's on.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on May 08, 2007, 03:49:11 PM
Where are all the scintillating updates?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: phattymatty on May 08, 2007, 03:54:50 PM
he won't leak anything that he and andy talk about.


oh, and lots and lots of fake laughing.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on May 08, 2007, 04:01:06 PM
McNabb says he thinks he could play in the second preseason game
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on May 08, 2007, 04:07:40 PM
If he plays more than two quarters of preseason ball I think I'll shtein in my pants. Let the dude heal for christ's sake.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on May 08, 2007, 04:08:06 PM
Quote from: BigEd76 on May 08, 2007, 04:01:06 PM
McNabb says he thinks he could play in the second preseason game

The first two games are 4 days apart and 3+ months away.  Why would he think he'd be ready for the 2nd but not the 1st?  Is he just afraid of facing Baltimore's defense?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MDS on May 08, 2007, 04:09:52 PM
He's afraid of going to BaltimoreOHMIGODTHEWIRE
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on May 08, 2007, 04:10:27 PM
 :-D
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on May 08, 2007, 04:10:52 PM
What's the wire?  Does it have something to do with the status of Darwin Walker's thigh?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on May 08, 2007, 04:12:20 PM
I heard the wire IS shot at the NovaCare complex.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MDS on May 08, 2007, 04:13:28 PM
Andy Reid = Prop Joe.

Over everyone's head. Damnit.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on May 08, 2007, 04:14:13 PM
I heard the wire IS shot at the NovaCare complex.

barksdale be runnin ish up in that piece

word to gawd
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on May 08, 2007, 04:14:27 PM
Quote from: MDS on May 08, 2007, 04:13:28 PM
Andy Reid = Prop Joe.

Over everyone's head. Damnit.

it was still funnier than Feva's
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on May 08, 2007, 04:14:43 PM
Quote from: EagleFeva on May 08, 2007, 04:12:20 PM
IS shot

Please tell me those Miami thugs finished the job on Romey MacDoogs this time.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MDS on May 08, 2007, 04:16:08 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on May 08, 2007, 04:14:13 PM
I heard the wire IS shot at the NovaCare complex.

barksdale be runnin ish up in that piece

word to gawd

It's sad that everytime I hear the last name Barksdale, I think of Avon and kind of DeAngelo.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on May 08, 2007, 04:16:51 PM
Quote from: FastFreddie on May 08, 2007, 04:10:52 PM
What's the wire?   Does it have something to do with the status of Darwin Walker's thigh?
Nah, its about Buckhalters knee
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on May 08, 2007, 04:17:42 PM
Quote from: SunMo on May 08, 2007, 04:14:27 PM
Quote from: MDS on May 08, 2007, 04:13:28 PM
Andy Reid = Prop Joe.

Over everyone's head. Damnit.

it was still funnier than Feva's

You probably still haven't stopped giggling.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on May 08, 2007, 04:18:15 PM
the sound waves from my giggles cure AIDS
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on May 08, 2007, 04:20:53 PM
You just can't get hard core football talk like this anywheres but CF.  Holla.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyandBCEagles on May 08, 2007, 05:52:41 PM
Quote from: FastFreddie on May 08, 2007, 10:53:29 AM
If anyone ever wears #20 for the Eagles again after Dawkins, the front office should napalmed.

I feel the same way about #34.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Father Demon on May 08, 2007, 06:19:37 PM
nm
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on May 09, 2007, 04:52:13 PM
mcknee and if you look closely enough you can see some mcbrain in the shorts

(http://media.philly.com/images/20070509_dn_g1eags09s.jpg)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on May 09, 2007, 04:55:53 PM
i'm not looking closely enough to see if it's true
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on May 09, 2007, 04:59:15 PM
liar
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on May 09, 2007, 07:47:26 PM
knee looks good to me, suit him up
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on May 09, 2007, 09:42:31 PM
CSN.com (http://philadelphia.comcastsportsnet.com/view_content_box.asp?ID=49790)

QuoteTrotter Expecting to Remain a Starter
by Andy Schwartz
ComcastSportsNet.com


Donovan McNabb isn't concerned about losing his job.

Neither is Jeremiah Trotter.

After the Eagles drafted Kevin Kolb, head coach Andy Reid told McNabb not to worry. McNabb was still their guy. But that same weekend, defensive coordinator Jim Johnson said that Trotter will be challenged by second-year pro Omar Gaither.

Trotter has been the Eagles' starting middle linebacker for 5½ of the last eight seasons (he played two seasons in Washington). The nine-year veteran admitted that last season wasn't one of his best.

"You can't expect to go out every year and be at the top of your game. You're going to have some down years," Trotter told Comcast SportsNet's Derrick Gunn on Wednesday. "This is the NFL, and if you play long enough, you're not going to go out and dominate every year, every play. I had a down year."

A day earlier, McNabb said he expects to "be in my spot" once the season starts. When training camp opens in July, Trotter will be one of a litany of linebackers competing for a job. The Eagles signed veteran Takeo Spikes in March and drafted Stewart Bradley last month. Spikes and Chris Gocong are penciled in on the weak and strong side, respectively. But head coach Andy Reid has said he plans to start the three best players.

Does Trotter worry about his job security?

"No," he said.

Why not?

"Because I don't," Trotter said. "I know the player I am. When I step on that field this year, all of those questions will be answered. Two years ago, there were no questions about job security, weight, play-making ability, knees. It's easy when you have bad year to point the finger at a certain issue. Those small problems become bigger when you're losing games. I understand that, that's the way the business goes. So I made up my mind this off-season to go out and work as hard as possible, get myself in the best possible shape, and go out there and crack some heads this year."

Last season, for the first time since 2002 with the taterskins, Trotter failed to record a sack. He had only one interception, one quarterback hurry and one forced fumble. The proverbial icing on the cake came in the playoffs against the Saints, when he was badly fooled on a TD run by running back Deuce McAllister.

One reason for Trotter's subpar season was his weight.

"I wasn't fat, but I was overweight," said Trotter, who is listed at 262 pounds in the team's media guide. "As you get further along in your career – I've had four knee surgeries – I can't play at the same weight I played at when I was 21 or 22. Now I've got to drop my weight down to about 250."

Why was Trotter overweight? After the Eagles went 6-10 in 2005, he relaxed.

"I focused on just resting my body," Trotter said. "I took a beating – that was one of the hardest years of my career – and I wanted to rest during the off-season, but I rested a little too much. But I've been working hard since day one this off-season, in there everyday getting my body into shape mentally and physically, and I'm ready to go."

Even if Trotter holds on to his starting spot, the Eagles likely will limit his reps; he should be replaced by Gaither in the nickel defense. But Trotter, who turned 30 in January, doesn't talk like someone whose career is winding down.

"I still think the sky's the limit for me. I said last year that my best years are ahead of me, and I still believe that," he said. "I look at a guy like Brian Dawkins – two years ago, when I was the only guy voted to the Pro Bowl – there was all criticism about [how] he lost a step, this and that, and he came back this year like a madman. To me, he should have been up for Defensive Player of the Year. He had a great, awesome year. He came back and proved everybody wrong. I'm in the same situation."

As is the team itself.

"I'm excited for this team, this organization and this city because I believe we're going to surprise a lot of people," Trotter said. "A lot of people talk about Donovan's health and where our defense was ranked last year – we couldn't stop the run – but we're going to answer a lot of questions this year. I really believe that."

==========================

The Point After
   
What does Jeremiah Trotter think of the Eagles' decision to draft quarterback Kevin Kolb?

"I've never been in the war room on draft day. I don't sit in the meetings and watch film and break down film, but obviously those guys saw something in this quarterback," Trotter said. "Obviously everyone knows Donovan is the man. He's the team leader. They bring in a young guy for the future – whether it's eight years, nine years – who knows?

"Right now Donovan is coming off an injury. He's doing great. He's working hard. His spirits are up, which is the most important thing. They're just bringing in a young guy to groom – the same way Green Bay brought in a young guy (Aaron Rodgers in 2005) for Brett Favre. Brett Favre could play six or seven more years, but they still have a young guy there just in case he decides to do otherwise. I think it was just one of those situations."

Video clip (bad season) (http://philadelphia.comcastsportsnet.com/media/video/eagles/050907-Trotterseason.wmv)
Video clip (not worried about losing starting job) (http://philadelphia.comcastsportsnet.com/media/video/eagles/050907-Trotterjobsecurity.wmv)
Video clip (McNabb/Kolb) (http://philadelphia.comcastsportsnet.com/media/video/eagles/050907-TrotteronMcNabb.wmv)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on May 09, 2007, 09:50:31 PM
Ax-Man!

Bow to Five Fo, bitches.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on May 09, 2007, 10:53:27 PM
"Eight years, nine years...who knows?"

ha ha ha
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Geowhizzer on May 09, 2007, 10:59:06 PM
Quote from: Diomedes on May 09, 2007, 10:53:27 PM
"Eight years, nine years...who knows?"

ha ha ha

Well, remember, Jeremiah can't count too well.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on May 10, 2007, 09:56:47 AM
It'll be nice to have a veteran presence like Trotter on special teams this season.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: mussa on May 10, 2007, 12:52:32 PM
Anyone notice Bunkley is now wearing #97 :paranoid

Victor is wearing his #78
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on May 10, 2007, 12:54:19 PM
Quote from: mussa on May 10, 2007, 12:52:32 PM
Anyone notice Bunkley is now wearing #97 :paranoid

Yeah, someone (Feva or SD, I think) mentioned all the new jersey numbers.

Bunkley doing as well as Darwin Walker this year would, sadly, exceed my expectations.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: mussa on May 10, 2007, 03:42:00 PM
i expect great things from him this year. nobody just looks like the thing and doesn't perform like him. the guy is an animal. time to kill.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on May 10, 2007, 03:44:51 PM
He sure played like an animal last year:

(http://www.hedweb.com/animimag/sloth.jpg)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: mussa on May 10, 2007, 03:51:06 PM
 :-D that he did, but this year he's gonna be like:

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v101/ananumuss/dreamstime_gorilla6.jpg)

I guarantee
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on May 10, 2007, 03:52:44 PM
(http://www.philaflava.com/forum/images/smiles/dcracistemo0mp.gif)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: mussa on May 10, 2007, 03:53:37 PM
nm
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on May 10, 2007, 05:08:40 PM
Me Mutombo.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on May 11, 2007, 10:52:10 AM
Andrews with the mohawk (http://philadelphia.comcastsportsnet.com/media/video/eagles/051007-Andrewsminicamp.wmv)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Magical_Retard on May 11, 2007, 10:54:57 AM
does anybody think the eagles will make any more moves this offseason?

i have a feeling they feel the team is complete and wont be doing anything from here on.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on May 11, 2007, 11:05:27 AM
if andrews face is any indication hes looks super small
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on May 11, 2007, 11:25:09 AM
Quote from: Magical_Retard on May 11, 2007, 10:54:57 AM
does anybody think the eagles will make any more moves this offseason?

i have a feeling they feel the team is complete and wont be doing anything from here on.

Rayburn's outta here one way or another.

I don't think they're adding any more players, no.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on May 11, 2007, 11:44:23 AM
Is PG going to stalk outside the Novacare this year?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on May 11, 2007, 02:39:28 PM
Quote from: Magical_Retard on May 11, 2007, 10:54:57 AM
does anybody think the eagles will make any more moves this offseason?

i have a feeling they feel the team is complete and wont be doing anything from here on.

I think they're about done.  Unless someone 1. a top quality player surpisingly shakes free and 2. they agree to a surpisingly small paycheck.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on May 11, 2007, 04:54:56 PM
Quote from: Magical_Retard on May 11, 2007, 10:54:57 AM
does anybody think the eagles will make any more moves this offseason?

i have a feeling they feel the team is complete and wont be doing anything from here on.

Probably done, but this has been their most active free agency period under this FO besides when we got TO and Kearse so we'll see. The only conceivable thing I can see is if a quality safety or corner gets released in june. The Eagles might have interest.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on May 11, 2007, 08:20:12 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on May 11, 2007, 11:05:27 AM
if andrews face is any indication hes looks super small

I believe he said he's down to 325-330 now

Stud.

I need a green #73 butta joint
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on May 11, 2007, 09:37:32 PM
(http://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/uploads/photos/perm/main/NCEAJJLLIKAG/051107-mc22.jpg)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on May 11, 2007, 09:38:55 PM
Would someone please iron that douchbag's collar before letting him out of the building.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on May 12, 2007, 12:33:57 AM
^^^
Completely agree....are these people professionals, or just straight up amateurs?  farg.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: General_Failure on May 12, 2007, 07:14:52 AM
Professional amateurs. It's the whole faux low-budget look. The kids love it.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on May 12, 2007, 07:55:42 AM
Five-Fo thinks his best days are still ahead of him.  That's sweet.


QuoteTrotter working to regain old form

Linebacker has a role model in the secondary.

By Bob Brookover

Inquirer Staff Writer

The Eagles' Jeremiah Trotter knows that a growing number of people believe his best days are behind him.

Jeremiah Trotter already knows how he wants the story of his 2007 season to unfold, and he's not afraid to admit that he intends to plagiarize the work of a teammate.

He wants to duplicate Brian Dawkins' experience.

"People were saying he was done two years ago," Trotter said earlier this week. "And last year, B. Dawk came back like a wild animal. To me, he should have been in the top two or three vote- getters for defensive player of the year. Even when we were struggling on defense, he was the one guy that played week in and week out. That's an example of how you can turn it around."

The Eagles middle linebacker realizes that there's a growing population out there that believes his best days are behind him and that 2006 signaled the beginning of the end of an NFL career that has already spanned eight seasons, half of which landed him a spot in the Pro Bowl.

"I had a bad year for me," Trotter said. "It was an average year. It was great at times, but by the end of the season, I got worn down a little bit. The Eagles' fans and the organization were used to seeing me play at a high level, so when you don't have a great year, there are going to be questions. The knee issue comes up and people start talking about your age.

"I'm still young. I'm only 30 years old. I'm not worried about my knees. I'm excited about this year and I feel great."

The next three days should be interesting because the post-draft minicamp, which begins today at the NovaCare Complex, always offers the first glance at how the coaching staff plans to use its players for the coming season. Everything, of course, is subject to change once the pads go on in tra,ining camp and the preseason games take place, but this is where the initial plan is hatched.

Trotter will be lining up at middle linebacker this morning when the No. 1 defense takes the field. But he realizes he won't be on the field as much this season as he was last year, and he's fine with that.

"I think the goal is to have me average 2½ downs," Trotter said. "I'll be out there on first down and second down and sometimes on third down, depending on the situation. I'm sure any opportunity they can get to give me a rest, they're going to want to do that. I'm thankful that they want to take care of my well-being."

A year ago, Trotter was on the field almost all the time. The plan was to use Shawn Barber in the middle on passing downs, but the veteran linebacker missed three games and had to leave a few others because of various injuries. Omar Gaither, who finished the year as the starting weakside linebacker, figures to be the middle linebacker on passing downs this season.

Trotter thinks he also wore down because the Eagles had such a difficult time stopping the run. They finished 26th in the NFL, allowing 136.4 yards per game.

"The more teams run the ball, the more pounding you're going to take," Trotter said. "I'm not getting any younger, but when you don't stop the run the way you're supposed to, teams are going to keep running it. I don't think I was the only player that got worn down last year. I think other defensive linemen and linebackers got worn down, too."

The Eagles believe help has arrived in the form of Takeo Spikes, a two-time Pro Bowler acquired in a trade with the Buffalo Bills.

"Oh, man, I was excited to get a player of his caliber," Trotter said. "I think teams felt like they had to put a body on me when they wanted to run the ball, and that's what happens when you play at a certain level. When you add a guy like Takeo Spikes, that's another guy who makes plays, and he's going to help me a lot."

Trotter also has tried to help himself this off-season by changing his workout schedule. Immediately after last season, there was speculation that Trotter had arrived at training camp overweight and out of shape.

"I rested a lot" after the 2005 season, Trotter said. "I was the only one on the team that went to the Pro Bowl, and then I had [knee] surgery right after the season, so my off-season was a lot shorter. My mind-set was to rest my body.

"What I learned from that situation is that there are other ways to rest your body. This year, I started working out a lot sooner. Three days after the season was over, I started working out with light weights and high reps. My weight wasn't as much a problem last year as my muscle mass being down. I wasn't as strong as normal, and I've always taken pride in my strength. This year, my muscle mass is back to where it usually is."

Now, Trotter and the Eagles are hoping the linebacker's elite level of play returns, too.

"I still believe with every bone in my body that my best years are ahead of me," Trotter said. "And this year, everybody is going to see that."
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Dillen on May 12, 2007, 12:26:53 PM
Quote from: Jerome99RIP on May 12, 2007, 07:55:42 AM
Five-Fo thinks his best days are still ahead of him.  That's sweet.

Quote"And this year, everybody is going to see that."
Just like last year when he predicted something outrageous like 6 sacks and 6 picks.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Dillen on May 12, 2007, 01:05:53 PM
Bethel Johnson farged up his tibia. Done.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on May 12, 2007, 01:15:12 PM
dont ask me why but i was reading spadaros mini camp blog and came across this beauty...


10:21 AM

The first thing I see on the practice field is the offensive line working together. It is a huge group, and Juan Castillo is one of the very best in the business. At this particular moment, the linemen are carrying weighted bags on their helmets, moving in rhythm with the added weight. Then they take the bags to their chests and slide step left, side step right.

Everything is perfect. It's Eagles football.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on May 12, 2007, 01:18:14 PM
OMG! TROTTER IS WEARING A FLYERS SHIRT AT HIS NEWS CONFERENCE.  THAT HAS TO MEAN SOMETHING!

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on May 12, 2007, 02:02:53 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on May 12, 2007, 01:15:12 PM
dont ask me why but i was reading spadaros mini camp blog and came across this beauty...


10:21 AM

The first thing I see on the practice field is the offensive line working together. It is a huge group, and Juan Castillo is one of the very best in the business. At this particular moment, the linemen are carrying weighted bags on their helmets, moving in rhythm with the added weight. Then they take the bags to their chests and slide step left, side step right.

Everything is perfect. It's Eagles football.



Spadaro>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on May 12, 2007, 02:07:02 PM
Quote from: Dillen on May 12, 2007, 01:05:53 PM
Bethel Johnson farged up his tibia. Done.

Heard he fractured it. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Wingspan on May 12, 2007, 02:31:22 PM
Official site has it said as a stress fracture. so he's likely only done for the time being, and not a season ending fracture or break.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Geowhizzer on May 12, 2007, 02:38:32 PM
Quote from: Wingspan on May 12, 2007, 02:31:22 PM
Official site has it said as a stress fracture. so he's likely only done for the time being, and not a season ending fracture or break.

So far, at least.  Hope for the best.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Munson on May 12, 2007, 02:45:16 PM
Great. Might be an excuse for them to resign and use up a roster spot on Reno.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MadMarchHare on May 12, 2007, 03:09:09 PM
Nah, it was him or Bloom.  Barksdale might find a way to make the active roster now, though.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Dillen on May 12, 2007, 03:35:19 PM
Quote from: Wingspan on May 12, 2007, 02:31:22 PM
Official site has it said as a stress fracture. so he's likely only done for the time being, and not a season ending fracture or break.
You think they're going to even bother having with him when him and Bloom were pretty much going to be neck and neck throughout the entire TC and preseason? I really dont know, I'm curious. I just think it locks Bloom in.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on May 12, 2007, 04:02:10 PM
Only a stress fracture. He'll be 100% for TC.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on May 12, 2007, 06:08:51 PM
Quote from: King Cole on May 12, 2007, 04:02:10 PM
Only a stress fracture. He'll be 100% for TC.

Thanks for the diagnosis, Dr. Kilpatient.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on May 12, 2007, 06:23:35 PM
(http://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/uploads/photos/perm/main/BEMNDJMEJKAG/07MC18-051207.jpg)

Jevon Kearse, wide receiver, Philadelphia Eagle

Holy jeez...I know he said he was down to 235 and will bulk before camp, but it looks weird seeing him that skinny.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on May 12, 2007, 06:29:17 PM
Killa looks like he bulked up during the offseason.  Kearse looks like a triathlete, not a football player.  I don't see how he's gonna bulk up before the start of training camp unless he used "teh creem."
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on May 12, 2007, 06:34:25 PM
(http://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/uploads/photos/perm/main/EEICELBEJKAG/07MC5-051207.jpg)

(http://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/uploads/photos/perm/main/EEICELBEJKAG/07MC12-051207.jpg)

Jason Davis w/ #34 now
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on May 12, 2007, 06:48:13 PM
QuoteThe Eagles had their first mini-camp practice earlier today. During practice there were quite a few differences from last year that stood out today. And of course, there were fresh faces, making their first impressions on their teammates and the Philadelphia media.

First, the linebackers are clearly a lot bigger. They actually look like grown men out there. Free-agent acquisition Takeo Spikes looks great right now. He appeared completely recovered from his Achilles injury of two years ago. During practice, his play displayed a great burst along with acceleration and sharp recognition, which allowed him to jump routes and make plays during the course of practice. Spikes did not practice as if he was just becoming familiar with Jim Johnson's defense.

Also of note from the linebacking corps, strong side linebacker Chris Gocong looks a lot better than he did last year. He's recognizing offenses significantly better and is showing that he now understands his position. Also, the 2nd-year linebacker looks quicker, which is probably due to that improved understanding of the position. He was getting good jams on the tight ends and showed the ability to run with them as well. Gocong also used his size and strength to get off of blocks well along with good awareness against both the pass and the run. So, overall, Gocong played in a non-Dhani Jones type fashion, which is encouraging.

Running back Ryan Moats has added some size (maybe now we will no longer mistake him for a player's kid), as has WR Jason Avant and LB Tank Daniels. These guys must have been living in the weight room during the off-season. Speaking of size, running back Tony Hunt is even bigger than I expected and he showed early on that he is very physical.

Kevin Kolb had some trouble with the snaps. He looks like he has an average to above average arm. Observers could tell he was thinking a lot, but he looked like he handled the situation pretty well given all that was placed on his plate during his first practice. Andy Reid and Marty Mornhinweg were taking their time with the young QB. Donovan McNabb was at practice and was also giving Kolb some pointers. Kelly Holcomb did not look very impressive in the first practice. His arm looks weak, he throws a lot check downs and hardly goes downfield with ball. He really didn't look any better than the green rookie, Kolb. I don't think he'll be around long, and if he continues to practice like he did today, he won't be.

Strong safety Sean Considine struggled some. I saw him get turned around on one route and pick up what would have been a pass interference penalty.

Receiver Reggie Brown had a collision with one of the defensive backs and left practice with a knee contusion. The minor injury may keep Brown out for the rest of mini-camp.

Defensive end Jerome McDougle looks like he is on his way out, as second-round pick Victor Abiamiri is already ahead of him on the depth chart. Abiamiri is currently backing up Jevon Kearse and is clearly the team's biggest defensive end.

William Thomas did not practice today due to arthroscopic knee surgery. Winston Justice filled in for him at the starting left tackle spot. Justice looks like he has definitely put in a lot of work during the off-season, as has fellow second year offensive lineman, Max Jean-Gilles.

Jason Avant looked very good in practice. He is a guy who has no qualms about running routes through the middle or blocking defensive backs down field. As mentioned earlier, he has added some size in the off season which should help him quite a bit. Meanwhile, on the other end of the size spectrum, I have to note that Kevin Curtis is small – not much bigger than Jeremy Bloom. Whenever both line up at the same time, the Lollipop Guild from the "Wizard of Oz" comes to mind. This means that the team lost some significant size at the WR position by losing Donte Stallworth. However, Kevin Curtis looked good running short routes. His quickness will definitely help out the team.


Other Notes:

Bethel Johnson has a stress factor in his fibia, and did not work out in the early practice.

Pro-Bowl safety Brian Dawkins was not at practice today, due to family issues.

L.J. Smith spent practice in the training room due to his coming down with some flu-like symptoms.

Former Colt defensive tackle Monte Reagor was not a practice due to knee surgery about which Head Coach Andy Reid did not give any details.

I'll be back with more on today's late practice. Stick with us here on GCOBB.COM for the latest on Eagles Mini-Camp.

from GCobb
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on May 12, 2007, 06:56:28 PM
Barksdale might find a way to make the active roster now, though

;)  good one
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on May 12, 2007, 07:48:31 PM
WTF about reagor having knee surgery.  I know its early but that came out of nowhere.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on May 13, 2007, 07:02:18 AM
Quote from: Jerome99RIP on May 12, 2007, 06:29:17 PM
"teh creem."

Garcia's no longer on the team, tho.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Don Ho on May 13, 2007, 04:20:29 PM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on May 12, 2007, 06:23:35 PM
(http://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/uploads/photos/perm/main/BEMNDJMEJKAG/07MC18-051207.jpg)

Jevon Kearse, wide receiver, Philadelphia Eagle

Holy jeez...I know he said he was down to 235 and will bulk before camp, but it looks weird seeing him that skinny.

WTF!!  I thought pinky was out of football?  Kearse looks sickly.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: NGM on May 13, 2007, 04:23:21 PM
I really wish the Eagles would change their uniforms back to Kelly green. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on May 13, 2007, 05:31:07 PM
Notice how Freak is palming his lid...
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on May 13, 2007, 05:53:47 PM
(http://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/uploads/photos/perm/main/NDLLEHDEONEN/07MC13-051307.jpg)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on May 13, 2007, 05:55:17 PM
(http://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/uploads/photos/perm/main/LOLNDILDONEN/07MC2-051307.jpg)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on May 13, 2007, 05:56:24 PM
(http://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/uploads/photos/perm/main/NDLLEHDEONEN/bunkley-hp-051307.jpg)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on May 13, 2007, 05:57:51 PM
(http://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/uploads/photos/perm/main/NDLLEHDEONEN/bunkley-051307.jpg)
QuoteA New Season, A New Bunkley


May 13, 2007
By JOSH WHEELING

Thirteen tackles, no sacks.

That was defensive tackle Brodrick Bunkley's stat line from his 2006 rookie campaign. This off-season, however, the former first-round pick has put in a concerted effort to make sure the only time he sees those numbers again is on his stat line for one game.

"It hurt me, man," Bunkley said of his first season. "Coming into the off-season I told myself 'it's a new year, time to make things happen.'"

After a 16-day contract holdout that lasted until Aug. 5, over halfway through last year's training camp, Bunkley entered far behind everyone else on a deep defensive line, and as a result he saw very little action despite being healthy all year.

DT Brodrick Bunkley
This spring he has taken it upon himself to train hard, learn the playbook and keep in touch with the coaches whenever possible. He's lost nearly 25 pounds in the past year. He changed his number from 78 to 97 to be like the other defensive linemen on the team. According to defensive coordinator Jim Johnson, he's a totally different player.

"He's come a long way," Johnson said. "He's a different person. He's around here every day. He's attentive. He's picking things up. He's working hard. What a difference a year makes with him."

Bunkley used the motivation of not getting to play much and being labeled as a disappointment to come back this year and prove that he deserved to be selected 14th overall in the draft.

"I came in here with a new mindset," Bunkley said. "Last year kind of rung a bell for me, and I wanted to come in early and work on every aspect of my game: get stronger, get quicker and just slim down a little bit, which I've done, and just be able to get to the football."

Players can often make empty promises about their work ethic, but Bunkley showed how serious he was about improving in the past few months.

"We had a little talk with him in the beginning of the off-season, and he said he was going to be here every day," Johnson said. "Some guys say that, but he's been here every day. I have never had to call him to see where he's at; he's here. This is his home."

Johnson has been so impressed with his young defensive tackle that Bunkley is penciled in as the starter opposite 2005 first-rounder Mike Patterson. That, along with the promotion of strongside linebacker Chris Gocong to starter, came as a shock to many.

But with all of the changes made at the tackle position -- veteran Darwin Walker was traded and Sam Rayburn was released -- Bunkley will not be handed the starting job on Sept. 9 at Green Bay on a silver platter. He'll have to beat out veteran Montae Reagor, who is recovering from injuries suffered in a car crash from October, as well as former Bears linemen Ian Scott, both of whom the Eagles acquired in free agency.

However, if Bunkley continues his progress, he'll be in the starting lineup at the beginning of the season.

"Hopefully he will be the player we saw in college, being a physical force in front and making plays," Johnson said. "This is what we anticipate and right now, he's on track to be our starting tackle. He has a great attitude and he's working hard."
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on May 13, 2007, 06:04:49 PM
QuoteHe's lost nearly 25 pounds in the past year.

farg that. What is it with this farging team and their tiny ass defensive linemen.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MDS on May 13, 2007, 06:15:30 PM
Andy assumes every other coach likes passing as much as him. Duh.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on May 13, 2007, 06:20:11 PM
There's a sad amount of truth in that statement.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: mussa on May 13, 2007, 07:59:58 PM
im not sure of his weigh now, but he was def above 300 last year. im hoping he's right around 300 right now... :-\
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on May 13, 2007, 08:52:59 PM
He looks like a DE not a DT
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on May 13, 2007, 08:55:46 PM
other than spadaro blog write ups is there any reason to believe that bunkley isnt the tackle version of jerome mcdougle
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on May 13, 2007, 10:01:18 PM
I don't know what you idiots are complaining about.  Bunkley looks ripped in those shots.  He actually looks like Corey Simon used to look when he was a Pro Bowler.

:-\
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on May 13, 2007, 10:06:17 PM
Im excited to see what he can do this year. I wanted him drafted last year and by no means should he be written off or compared to McDougle.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on May 13, 2007, 10:13:32 PM
The only problem I had with Bunkley last year was his holdout.  He was gone for only two weeks but it might as well have been two months.  When he did get in there, he was lost and it showed.  Some guys get the big money and then check out mentally for good.  That's a bust.  Busts don't re-dedicate themselves and hit the playbook and the weight room for an entire offseason the way Bunkley evidently has.

Like you I'm hoping like hell the guy turns out to be a stud. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on May 13, 2007, 10:19:28 PM
When he did get in there, he was lost and it showed


but he never got in there....and i think it was because he sucked ass...if he was really a great player but he was in the dog house he would have played...because thats what teams do...they play their best players...plus factor in that he was a high number one pick...the birds had every reason to play him and they didnt....so they either are the most stubborn people on the planet or he just cant play

which is it?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on May 13, 2007, 10:20:55 PM
the "being two weeks late ruined his season" crap is such bullshtein.  how long does a DT have to be in camp to rush the passer and hold up a blocker?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on May 13, 2007, 10:22:36 PM
Not saying I totally buy it, but the word from coaches and players, is unless you have the technique you can't do shtein. Brute strength isn't good enough to whip NFL OL's.

And its not just Eagles people who say that....
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on May 13, 2007, 10:23:57 PM
when was the last time a top 15 DT sat an entire rookie year because he didnt have good technique

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: General_Failure on May 13, 2007, 10:34:56 PM
Last season?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on May 13, 2007, 10:35:48 PM
did you google that?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on May 13, 2007, 10:36:05 PM
He was in Reid's & JJ's dog house from the get-go after he missed camp, IGY.  Add to that he was out of shape, didn't know the playbook and had an established veteran in Darwin Walker starting in front of him... it's no surprise he didn't get to play much, if at all.

Again - I'm still hopeful he'll be a force out there this season.  He certainly looks better now than he did plus it seems as though he has his coaches' confidence again.  That's two positive signs right off the bat.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: General_Failure on May 13, 2007, 10:36:54 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on May 13, 2007, 10:35:48 PM
did you google that?

Had to ask Jeeves.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on May 13, 2007, 11:39:27 PM
clip from Marty on Curtis and Brown (http://philadelphia.comcastsportsnet.com/media/video/eagles/051307-Mornhinweg2.wmv)

Good manners at the :25 mark...
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MURP on May 14, 2007, 02:51:38 PM
Bunkley will be able to rush the passer now that he weighs 230 lbs!  nice!#%#%
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Eaglez on May 14, 2007, 03:05:52 PM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on April 21, 2007, 12:58:23 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on April 21, 2007, 12:40:49 AM
you were in charlotte j?

Yeah, in 2003. When Kasay missed all those kicks. I think we tailgated right by your crew. Y'all had the Welcome to South Philly sign, right?

Good times down there. I was shteinfaced the night before. Bad. FF was on his game too, ask him all about it.

Those were some good times.  :yay
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on May 15, 2007, 08:05:56 AM
Quote"That's just how it is," Moats said. "Ryan Moats will be ready to go and Ryan Moats will give it all he's got. I ain't afraid of competition. Tony Hunt hasn't proven anything, either. He's got to prove it, too. I do, too. This isn't make-or-break for me. If I don't play here, I'll play somewhere. That's just how you have to look at it, but I'm here to make this team and I'm pretty sure I will."

:-D
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on May 15, 2007, 08:20:36 AM
(http://img407.imageshack.us/img407/2370/killerkearsems4.jpg)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: phattymatty on May 15, 2007, 08:26:40 AM
Quote from: Jerome99RIP on May 13, 2007, 10:36:05 PM
He was in Reid's & JJ's dog house from the get-go after he missed camp, IGY.  Add to that he was out of shape, didn't know the playbook and had an established veteran in Darwin Walker starting in front of him... it's no surprise he didn't get to play much, if at all.

Again - I'm still hopeful he'll be a force out there this season.  He certainly looks better now than he did plus it seems as though he has his coaches' confidence again.  That's two positive signs right off the bat.

you have to be a really stupid motherfarger to not be able to pick up your DT plays.  i know you guys think that JJ has this mind-boggling hard playbook, but when you're a DT, there's not a whole lot of options for things you should do.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on May 15, 2007, 08:42:50 AM
the good thing with bunkley is that he has to be better than last year....so even if he doesnt live up to his draft position at the very least the eagles will have a player who is better this year than last...

thats what im going with to put a positive spin on him
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on May 15, 2007, 08:47:28 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on May 15, 2007, 08:42:50 AM
the good thing with bunkley is that he has to be better than last year....so even if he doesnt live up to his draft position at the very least the eagles will have a player who is better this year than last...

thats what im going with to put a positive spin on him
Not bad Spads.  Phatty your right about him being partly retarded but i really think thats due to Florida State just letting him play.  Hopefully Jenkins can coach him up this year, and said he wants to show how good he is and how he's worthy of the 14th pick overall. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: phattymatty on May 15, 2007, 08:50:45 AM
Quote from: Seabiscuit36 on May 15, 2007, 08:47:28 AM
Not bad Spads.  Phatty your right about him being partly retarded but i really think thats due to Florida State just letting him play.  Hopefully Jenkins can coach him up this year, and said he wants to show how good he is and how he's worthy of the 14th pick overall. 

i actually just meant thats a horrible excuse for why he didn't play last year, no one can be that stupid.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on May 15, 2007, 09:18:03 AM
I think you give athletes too much credit in the intelligence department, matty.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on May 15, 2007, 09:26:38 AM
Players are coddled thru College in many cases.  Bunkley looks like he has FAS. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on May 15, 2007, 09:28:53 AM
THE Downs Baby THING!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: phattymatty on May 15, 2007, 09:30:35 AM
he kind of looks like a midget in those photos.  like he has been smushed over the offseason.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on May 15, 2007, 09:32:42 AM
hes to stupid
his college team coddled him
he was out of shape
he just needed to be coached up
florida states system doesnt allow rookies to play in the nfl
darwin walker (lol) was blocking his progress


ive never seen more lame excuses in my life

isnt it possible he just isnt a very good player
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on May 15, 2007, 09:34:02 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on May 15, 2007, 09:32:42 AM
hes to stupid

Winnar.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on May 15, 2007, 09:39:56 AM
because playing DT takes so much intelligence and all the guys currently playing DT in the nfl are mensa members


anyway
we get it romey
all athletes are overpaid idiots
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MDS on May 15, 2007, 10:34:20 AM
just stop it now. stop it.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyGirl on May 15, 2007, 11:28:09 AM
Quote from: Jerome99RIP on May 13, 2007, 10:36:05 PM
He was in Reid's & JJ's dog house from the get-go after he missed camp, IGY.  Add to that he was out of shape, didn't know the playbook and had an established veteran in Darwin Walker starting in front of him... it's no surprise he didn't get to play much, if at all.

Again - I'm still hopeful he'll be a force out there this season.  He certainly looks better now than he did plus it seems as though he has his coaches' confidence again.  That's two positive signs right off the bat.

Actually, he was in REID'S doghouse. JJ wanted to play him more, Reid told him not to.

And I got this from my "source" last year, but never posted it.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on May 15, 2007, 11:33:31 AM
Reid and JJ. JJ and Reid. They're basically the same goddamned person at this point. Fired.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on May 15, 2007, 11:42:24 AM
Actually, he was in REID'S doghouse. JJ wanted to play him more, Reid told him not to

so basically reid did to bunkley what he did to mike lewis and hood

all over money

one for holding out the other two for turning down eagle offers



Reid and JJ. JJ and Reid. They're basically the same goddamned person at this point. Fired.


reid and banner/lurie are much more closely related than reid and jj
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyGirl on May 15, 2007, 11:43:44 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on May 15, 2007, 11:42:24 AM
Actually, he was in REID'S doghouse. JJ wanted to play him more, Reid told him not to

so basically reid did to bunkley what he did to mike lewis and hood

all over money

one for holding out the other two for turning down eagle offers



Pretty much. Only he was also really pissed that Bunkley was out of shape when he came to camp after holding out. Jj wanted him in there MUCH earlier, Reid put his foot down.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on May 15, 2007, 11:53:27 AM
If Bunkley was kept out of action despite being the better player, then Reid should be fired right now.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on May 15, 2007, 11:54:22 AM
whats amazing to me is the second lewis got benched is when the eagles went on that five game stretch where they gave up 200+ rushing yards three times

and yet he had lewis whos specialty is coming up and knocking people sitting while considine is getting trampled....this continued all the way to the new orleans game where lewis barely played....even tho the saints were running at will...youd think you could put aside petty differences in the playoffs at least

furthermore you had a #1 pick DT at your disposal...someone who could possibly help your team...but instead you ignore him and watched as patterson walker rayburn et al got merked up and down the field

and reid all but admitted this offseason that he needed help by overhauling the DT position...yet he refused to put bunkley on the field

its almost like he wanted to prove to the fans that the front office was right when they said how hurt bunkley would be by holding out...and to show players whats happens when someone holds out on this regime
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on May 15, 2007, 11:56:02 AM
Again, if Bunkley was the better player and JJ wanted to play him, this is ridiculous.

It's much more likely Bunkley was NOT the best option last year and probably won't be this year, either.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on May 15, 2007, 11:57:09 AM
If Bunkley was kept out of action despite being the better player, then Reid should be fired right now.

bunkley might just suck...well find out this year when he plays...if he comes out and is a player you have to believe that he was def blackballed last year....

but lewis is a no brainer....hes clearly a better player than considine and reid essentially ended his season in week 6

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on May 15, 2007, 12:05:42 PM
You only think that because Lewis is black.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on May 15, 2007, 12:26:00 PM
I know it was preseason but he was a beast when in there.  I'd love to see him destroy G's this season so Reid does look like a fool, and i like Reid. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on May 15, 2007, 12:43:40 PM
Quote from: PhillyGirl on May 15, 2007, 11:28:09 AM
Quote from: Jerome99RIP on May 13, 2007, 10:36:05 PM
He was in Reid's & JJ's dog house from the get-go after he missed camp, IGY.  Add to that he was out of shape, didn't know the playbook and had an established veteran in Darwin Walker starting in front of him... it's no surprise he didn't get to play much, if at all.

Again - I'm still hopeful he'll be a force out there this season.  He certainly looks better now than he did plus it seems as though he has his coaches' confidence again.  That's two positive signs right off the bat.

Actually, he was in REID'S doghouse. JJ wanted to play him more, Reid told him not to.

And I got this from my "source" last year, but never posted it.

Who cares who stopped him from playing?  They could have used him and Reid treated him like a farging freshman in high school who broke curfew.

I find it highly hilarious that he treats his players with more discipline than the spoiled brats who live in his own house.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on May 15, 2007, 12:51:27 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on May 15, 2007, 09:39:56 AM
because playing DT takes so much intelligence and all the guys currently playing DT in the nfl are mensa members


anyway
we get it romey
all athletes are overpaid idiots


First of all, I was making fun of your misspelling of 'too' while assailing Bunkley's intelligence.

And when did I ever say that ALL athletes are overpaid or for that matter idiots?  Most are, some are certainly not.  Sorry to derail your hyperbole train, IGY.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on May 15, 2007, 01:24:20 PM
First of all, I was making fun of your misspelling of 'too' while assailing Bunkley's intelligence.

good stuff...proofreading message board posts is so 1997 tho


its especially funny because i wasnt even commenting on bunkleys intelligence much less 'assailing' it


Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on May 15, 2007, 01:24:43 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on May 15, 2007, 11:57:09 AM
If Bunkley was kept out of action despite being the better player, then Reid should be fired right now.

bunkley might just suck...well find out this year when he plays...if he comes out and is a player you have to believe that he was def blackballed last year....

but lewis is a no brainer....hes clearly a better player than considine and reid essentially ended his season in week 6



Way to cover yourself. If he sucks this upcoming season you'll say "I told you so", if he's decent you'll go the f/o conspiracy route saying he was 'blackballed' last season. Either way, you win.

I'll stick to my Bunkley prediction from a few months ago. He'll look good in camp and the preseason games...then he'll get injured.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on May 15, 2007, 01:34:10 PM
If he sucks this upcoming season you'll say "I told you so", if he's decent you'll go the f/o conspiracy route saying he was 'blackballed' last season. Either way, you win

i wont say i told you so...because im not predicting anything...i dont know how good he is...he might be a pro bowler this year or he might be jerome mcdougle

im saying the coaches very well might have been correct in not playing him last year and its a case of him just sucking

however if he comes out this year and is a player
six months after he couldnt get on the field
in a playoff game they were getting gouged against the run
then the red flags will be raised

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on May 15, 2007, 01:35:48 PM
If he sucks, you were right.  If he doesn't, the front office is at fault.

Got it.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on May 15, 2007, 01:37:03 PM
That's fine, but did you ever consider the possibility that he wasn't in the best of shape last season and just had a hard time conforming to the NFL? Seems unfair to put the entire blame on the coaching staff when maybe it was 50/50.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on May 15, 2007, 01:39:48 PM
PG just said that Reid told JJ not to play him, why would he step in to tell him not to play him unless he was trying to teach him a lesson.

if Bunkley was able to play at the NFL level last year, JJ would've known it and not played him.  Him trying to play Bunkley and not being allowed to points to something other than pure performance.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on May 15, 2007, 01:41:34 PM
out of shape when he got to lehigh in early august yes...out of shape in january when they played the saints...bulshtein


If he sucks, you were right.

ATTN ROMEY: I NEVER AT ANY TIME SAID HE WOULD SUCK

i loved the pick when they made it and i still have hope he can be a player...tho i am admittedly concerned now that he might suck simply because he couldnt stay on the field last year in any of their 18 games....pretty strange for a high first round pick who wasnt hurt
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on May 15, 2007, 01:42:52 PM
Quote from: SunMo on May 15, 2007, 01:39:48 PM
PG just said that Reid told JJ not to play him, why would he step in to tell him not to play him unless he was trying to teach him a lesson.
You can't be serious?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on May 15, 2007, 01:46:53 PM
PG just said that Reid told JJ not to play him, why would he step in to tell him not to play him unless he was trying to teach him a lesson.

if Bunkley was able to play at the NFL level last year, JJ would've known it and not played him.  Him trying to play Bunkley and not being allowed to points to something other than pure performance.


right...and this is the other possibility i mentioned vs him not being a player

im going to highly question anyones source on the internet...however if pg's is legit AND correct its pretty clear which one happened

its hard for me to believe he couldnt crack the lineup at all...it wasnt as if he was playing behind jerome brown

i truly hope it was reid keeping him off the field for personal reasons because if bunkley was really that awful last year then i dont have much hope for him ever being a guy that will live up to where he was picked
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on May 15, 2007, 01:50:49 PM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on May 15, 2007, 01:42:52 PM
Quote from: SunMo on May 15, 2007, 01:39:48 PM
PG just said that Reid told JJ not to play him, why would he step in to tell him not to play him unless he was trying to teach him a lesson.
You can't be serious?

absolutely...you doubt it's true?  i don't, and i'm the most cynical mother farger on this board
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on May 15, 2007, 01:52:25 PM
Yes, I doubt it. Her 'source' might be good for some things but I doubt Reid or JJ would divulge such information to the press.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on May 15, 2007, 01:56:40 PM
no, they wouldn't, well maybe JJ would, because he's the one taking heat for the zesty run defense, but it absolutely could've been something JJ told an assistant who let it slip to a press member...
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on May 15, 2007, 02:00:32 PM
Whisper down the lane
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on May 15, 2007, 02:04:26 PM
This topic has developed FBA
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on May 15, 2007, 02:06:07 PM
Quote from: FastFreddie on May 15, 2007, 02:04:26 PM
This topic has developed FBA
Full Blown AIDS?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyGirl on May 15, 2007, 02:06:39 PM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on May 15, 2007, 01:52:25 PM
Yes, I doubt it. Her 'source' might be good for some things but I doubt Reid or JJ would divulge such information to the press.

My source had an off the record talk with JJ himself. Just an FYI.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on May 15, 2007, 02:09:33 PM
My source had an off the record talk with Tammy Reid
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on May 15, 2007, 02:14:05 PM
My source had an off the record talk with JJ himself. Just an FYI.

if the off the record talk happened and if the source is accurately representing what was said then i would tend to believe jj here because he could have just as easily blamed bunkley...in fact its much easier to blame the player...the fact that he blamed reid would say it all imo
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on May 15, 2007, 02:14:30 PM
Quote from: Seabiscuit36 on May 15, 2007, 02:06:07 PM
Quote from: FastFreddie on May 15, 2007, 02:04:26 PM
This topic has developed FBA
Full Blown AIDS?

Obviously, yes.

Quote from: PhillyGirl on May 15, 2007, 02:06:39 PM
My source had an off the record talk with JJ himself. Just an FYI.

My best friend's sister's boyfriend's brother's girlfriend heard from this guy who knows this kid who's going with the girl who saw Bunkley pass out at 31 Flavors last night.  I guess it's pretty serious.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on May 15, 2007, 02:14:36 PM
My sources tell me that my jacobs are farging massive. Terrifyingly massive. And if you all don't shut up they'll be the last thing you ever taste.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on May 15, 2007, 02:14:44 PM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on May 15, 2007, 02:09:33 PM
My source had an off the record talk with Tammy Reid

my source farged your source in the mouth, and didn't give a courtesy tap
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on May 15, 2007, 02:16:51 PM
Quote from: SunMo on May 15, 2007, 02:14:44 PM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on May 15, 2007, 02:09:33 PM
My source had an off the record talk with Tammy Reid

my source farged your source in the mouth, and didn't give a courtesy tap
That's perfectly acceptable if you're a mormon
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on May 15, 2007, 02:17:38 PM
Vote Romney!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on May 15, 2007, 02:17:46 PM
Jerry Falwell says you're all sinners and need to repent before it's too late.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyGirl on May 15, 2007, 02:18:46 PM
Quote from: FastFreddie on May 15, 2007, 02:14:30 PM
My best friend's sister's boyfriend's brother's girlfriend heard from this guy who knows this kid who's going with the girl who saw Bunkley pass out at 31 Flavors last night.  I guess it's pretty serious.

Right, thats really close to what I said.  ::)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on May 15, 2007, 02:19:10 PM
FBA (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s-vZJpqQufs)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on May 15, 2007, 03:59:53 PM
William JamesPeterson still thinks he can be the best CB in the NFL (http://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/homeNewsDetail.jsp?id=69123)

Darren Howard expects to do better this year than last year (http://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/homeNewsDetail.jsp?id=69327)


PE.com is reaching new lows every day.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on May 15, 2007, 04:01:53 PM
By JOHN CLAYTON...


Is that the same four-eyed geek from ESPN or someone else?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on May 15, 2007, 04:04:07 PM
I don't think so.  Ed would probably know for sure.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on May 15, 2007, 04:54:55 PM
John Clayton hacked the Eagles website!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on May 15, 2007, 07:02:13 PM
Summer intern with the same name
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on May 15, 2007, 07:04:01 PM
it's not even summer yet...
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: General_Failure on May 15, 2007, 07:35:18 PM
I hope you all die in a fire.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: methdeez on May 16, 2007, 12:17:16 AM
Where the hell did that come from?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: hbionic on May 16, 2007, 11:47:48 AM
Quote from: methdeez on May 16, 2007, 12:17:16 AM
Where the hell did that come from?

Fire was invented by cavemen.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on May 16, 2007, 12:29:44 PM
QuoteRich Hofmann | A Saintly obsession
IN MANY WAYS, BIRDS' FOCUS IS ON NEW ORLEANS
RELATED STORIES
Westbrook's brother signs with Washington
McNabb helps '86' Buddy's '46' defense
Days after rolling out of jail, 'Tank' to meet with Goodell
BACK IN THE day, back when the Boston Celtics
acquired Dennis Johnson just so they could have somebody to try to put the handcuffs on the Sixers' Andrew Toney, you could build your team that way. In that sport, in that time, the notion that you would construct yourself to counter a specific opponent made sense because the sporting world was more orderly and predictable.

The NFL is not like that, and 2007 is not like that. So the notion that the Eagles have just spent the offseason retooling in response to the way they were beaten by the New Orleans Saints in the playoffs is probably too simplistic. For all any of us knows, the Saints will stumble this season after breaking out under coach Sean Payton in 2006. In the salary-capped world of the NFL, there are too many moving parts, too many variables, too much parity. Keeping your eye on the ball means keeping your eyes moving constantly. To fixate on one team, on one spot, assures that you will miss the next move.

That said, the Saints do kind of hang over everything on NovaCare Way - even acknowledging that the Bears ended up winning the NFC, and the Colts ended up winning the Super Bowl, and the Patriots still scare everybody most of all. The Saints look like the team that has a chance to be there for a long time in the NFC, and they are on the Eagles' schedule again this season, just before Christmas.

"I've got that game circled on the calendar about three or four times," All-Pro guard Shawn Andrews was saying the other day. His reasons are more personal, though. He suffered a scary neck injury in the playoff loss, a contusion that sent him to the hospital, and while he won't talk about it, there is some kind of personal issue that he seems to feel needs settling. Whatever.

Andrews is fine now, same as always, all full of personality, showing off a new haircut in the locker room at the Eagles' minicamp, a mohawk kind of thing that he insists you refer to as a "bro-hawk." But when you ask him about the Saints - who ran all over the Eagles' defense, who prevented the Eagles from scoring down near the goal line in a crucial fourth-quarter sequence, who played shootout football and played ball-control football and did them both simultaneously - he turns serious.

"If you want to focus on that game, if that's your personal opinion, you're not alone," Andrews said. "A lot of people do and I can't say that you're wrong. We know what we have to do as a team, and we know what we have to do to better ourselves. We take from that what we can but we also move on."

You ask the same question to coach Andy Reid and he says that, ultimately, you can't fixate on the one game, the one loss.

At the same time, he said, "As far as making yourself into a good football team, I would say it's the freshest one on your mind, in particular when you're in the playoffs and you get beat by a team."

It is impossible not to see the influence that game had on the ensuing months - or, maybe more accurately, it might just be that the Saints playoff loss merely crystallized on one January evening the months of flaws and frustrations that the Eagles had been gradually uncovering all along.

You cannot say the result has been a revolution, but we are seeing a fast philosophical evolution taking place.

People in the organization scoffed when linebacker Jeremiah Trotter, in his frustration after the Eagles were run over during a regular-season game in Indianapolis, made the observation that the defense was just too small. But they have gotten bigger almost everywhere on defense in the offseason.

Run defense didn't used to matter to defensive coordinator Jim Johnson, provided some unspoken tipping point was not reached. Well, the Saints apparently tipped it. Now, run defense matters. Now, the Eagles even have deigned to sign Ian Scott, a defensive tackle described as a run stopper.

Run offense. The transformation began in the middle of last season, and there is now a vow to continue balancing this thing out, even after Donovan McNabb returns at quarterback. The drafting of Penn State running back Tony Hunt, the kind of between-the-tackles runner who has so often been an afterthought for the Eagles, seems to have provided some emphatic punctuation - and remind everyone of the touchdown that got away near the end of that Saints game.

But it is even more subtle than those points. When nickel linebacker Shawn Barber left the Saints game with an ankle injury, it did two things: mark the now-departed Barber as too much of an injury risk, once and for all, and mark Trotter as a guy who can never again be put in a position to play a ton of pass coverage. And, so, you see the remaking of the linebacking corps.

There are other things, too - maybe even including the arrival of Australian punter Saverio Rocca to compete with Dirk Johnson. That Saints game really does loom large around here, be it as Exhibit A or as a window to the Eagles' soul.

I'm thinking Andrew's definitely got cheapshotted.  He plays at probowl caliber happy, i cant wait to see him mad. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Dillen on May 16, 2007, 12:48:41 PM
I just want preseason to start, for the past week or two I've settled for watching the occasional Eagles scrub playing in NFL Europe. It's a shame that whoever JJ Outlaw is on never plays him though, he's a sick returner.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Munson on May 16, 2007, 01:00:12 PM
Quote from: General_Failure on May 15, 2007, 07:35:18 PM
I hope you all die in a fire.

Will this fire have AIDS?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on May 16, 2007, 01:20:27 PM
AIDS > Munson
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Wingspan on May 16, 2007, 01:30:19 PM
Quote from: hbionic on May 16, 2007, 11:47:48 AM
Quote from: methdeez on May 16, 2007, 12:17:16 AM
Where the hell did that come from?

Fire was invented by cavemen.

:-D

the buck shot hit it's target
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on May 16, 2007, 07:24:13 PM
Andrews staright up refuses to talk about his injury - he's refused numerous times. Now he says hes got NO circled?

I think that someone on the Saints defense is the target of Shawn's ire and he won't say it. Perhaps someone cheapshotted him?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on May 16, 2007, 07:39:56 PM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on May 16, 2007, 07:24:13 PM
Andrews staright up refuses to talk about his injury - he's refused numerous times. Now he says hes got NO circled?

I think that someone on the Saints defense is the target of Shawn's ire and he won't say it. Perhaps someone cheapshotted him?
Definitely my bet Phreak, he's not the type of guy to spout off about someone.  I'm just wondering who?  Hollis?  Grant?  Smith?  All i know is i want to see Angry Shawn!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on May 16, 2007, 07:45:49 PM
If Andrews performs at an all pro level as is, why would we want him to change his approach exactly?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MadMarchHare on May 16, 2007, 08:07:58 PM
I for one wouldn't mind seeing a little pissed off Runyan in him.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Eaglez on May 16, 2007, 08:14:54 PM
I agree. Not every player plays better when that player is angry. It could have a detrimental effect and actually throw him off his game.

Did FOX show a replay of Andrews' injury during that playoff game? I don't think he was down on the field. All I remember is hearing the announcers state that Andrews left the game and was replaced by the immovable object known as Scott Young. If it was a cheap shot you would think Andrews would be down on the field and not just merely being reported to be out of the game.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Don Ho on May 16, 2007, 11:28:30 PM
Quote from: Eaglez on May 16, 2007, 08:14:54 PM

Did FOX show a replay of Andrews' injury during that playoff game?

Don't you remember?  All FOX focused on was the whole feel good story, Brees, Reggie Bush, Sean Payton, some white trash trailer park skank wearing a "farg Da Eagles" cut-off shirt and worst of all Fat farg Sarigusa chugging the Saints all game.  Remember his little yelp of "YES" when McCalister drug half the free world into the endzone on that one td run?  Prick.  Oh and I think the opponent was the Eagles.  Not sure.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on May 17, 2007, 03:57:28 PM
(http://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/uploads/photos/perm/main/FLBPNPBEAOEN/PE0N6329.JPG)

GO EAGLES!!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: General_Failure on May 17, 2007, 05:22:01 PM
Who gave hbionic a jersey with no numbers on it?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on May 17, 2007, 05:31:22 PM
These are GOLD.

(http://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/uploads/photos/perm/main/FLBPNPBEAOEN/PE0N6250.JPG)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on May 17, 2007, 05:32:02 PM
T Money Cole to IGY:

"Barksdale who?"

(http://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/uploads/photos/perm/main/FLBPNPBEAOEN/PE0N6318.JPG)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on May 17, 2007, 05:33:19 PM
Juqua:  "I got yo look test right here, bitch."

(http://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/uploads/photos/perm/main/FLBPNPBEAOEN/PE0N6291.JPG)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on May 17, 2007, 05:35:51 PM
Zack Tuiasossosospsosposopo and Dustin "wishes he was Jason Sehorn" Fox show that the Eagles aren't ignoring the stylishly dressed young man quota with Garcia gone:

(http://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/uploads/photos/perm/main/FLBPNPBEAOEN/PE0N6310.JPG)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on May 17, 2007, 05:36:34 PM
Michael. Gasperson.

(http://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/uploads/photos/perm/main/FLBPNPBEAOEN/PE0N6308.JPG)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MDS on May 17, 2007, 05:50:52 PM
Stewart Bradley needs to do one of these. Now.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Dillen on May 17, 2007, 06:12:06 PM
I always thought Gasperson was a black dude. I guess he doesn't have a shot in the NFL now.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on May 17, 2007, 06:14:52 PM
luckily for whitey, the rest of his life is handed to him on a silver platter, so he should be fine.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on May 18, 2007, 08:01:39 AM
Quote from: Dillen on May 17, 2007, 06:12:06 PM
I always thought Gasperson was a black dude. I guess he doesn't have a shot in the NFL now.
Same here Dillen, i noticed that over the weekend and was shocked. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on May 18, 2007, 08:42:14 AM
luckily for whitey, the rest of his life is handed to him on a silver platter, so he should be fine.

ha
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on May 18, 2007, 09:17:59 AM
Shawn Andrews looks ripped.  Holy crap. 

(http://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/uploads/photos/perm/main/FLBPNPBEAOEN/PE0N6326.JPG)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on May 18, 2007, 09:28:24 AM
Quote from: Diomedes on May 17, 2007, 06:14:52 PM
luckily for whitey, the rest of his life is handed to him on a silver platter, so he should be fine.
This made me laugh
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on May 18, 2007, 09:35:21 AM
Quote from: Jerome99RIP on May 18, 2007, 09:17:59 AM
Shawn Andrews looks ripped.  Holy crap. 

(http://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/uploads/photos/perm/main/FLBPNPBEAOEN/PE0N6326.JPG)
Yeah he does, Andrew's physically is probably at his peak.  Im happy he got serious last year. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on May 18, 2007, 10:15:06 AM
http://www.phillyburbs.com/pb-dyn/news/256-05152007-1346769.html (http://www.phillyburbs.com/pb-dyn/news/256-05152007-1346769.html)

QuoteSmith's future may not be with Eagles


When he learned the Eagles had drafted a player at his position, L.J. Smith did not get a telephone call from Andy Reid, and he was nowhere near an ice cream parlor, and he wasn't shocked. Donovan McNabb damn near dumped a pound of jimmies on his daughter's sundae when he found out the Eagles had drafted a quarterback, but Smith said he barely raised an eyebrow after Brent Celek, out of the University of Cincinnati, officially became his teammate.

"Around here," Smith said yesterday, "you're always playing for your position."

Always, whether it's warranted or not. It's hard to imagine Celek will wrestle the job away from Smith this season, but beyond that, who knows? About to enter the final year of his contract, Smith is 27, still in the prime of his career and still cost-effective for the Eagles for now. He'll earn $920,000 this year, and though his agent and the Eagles spent some of last season trying to agree on an extension for him, nothing's been done yet. And nothing might be.

"We've had discussions, and we'll continue to have discussions," Smith's agent Brian Mackler said. "L.J's planning on having a Pro Bowl-caliber season again. Hopefully, he'll be an Eagle for life. If not, there are 31 other teams who'll be happy to have him."

Mackler sure sounded like Sam McNabb there, and maybe he wanted to jar the Eagles into taking seriously Smith's desire for a new contract. Team president Joe Banner did not return a phone call to his office, but the negotiations between Mackler and the franchise are going nowhere these days, according to a source close to the situation. So this is beginning to feel familiar, like another case of the Eagles' refusing to "overpay" for a position they don't value all that highly.

As a point of comparison, Daniel Graham recently signed a five-year, $30 million deal — $15 million of which was guaranteed — with the Denver Broncos. A year-and-a-half older than Smith, Graham caught 120 passes in five seasons with New England, including 17 for touchdowns and 23 for 20 yards or more. Smith has 172 receptions over his four seasons with the Eagles — 14 for touchdowns and 29 of 20+ yards. You decide who's been more productive. And if Smith has not the league's best blocking tight end, no one can deny he improved in that area after McNabb went down last season and the Eagles began bringing better balance to their offense.


"I just hope the season goes the way that it's supposed to," said Smith, who added that he is "not asking for what I'd get on the free-agent market" from the Eagles. "Honestly, it's not in my nature or character to cry about anything. Just suck it up and move on. It's like crying about a girl who doesn't

want me. You ask her out, and she either says yes or no. I'm in that position. Either the Eagles want to keep me, or they don't, and that's just how it is."

So here comes one more collision of present and future for the Eagles, another small story worth watching in the 2007 season's broader narrative. Short of Seleck's making a huge splash as a rookie, which seems a stretch, do the Eagles really believe they have a better alternative at tight end than Smith? At certain positions, such as linebacker and wide receiver, they've shown they'd rather pay a little less for competency than pay a little more for excellence, yet Smith's been here too long not to notice what happens to those who try to test that philosophy. Corey Simon, Brian Westbrook, Bobby Taylor, Rod Hood, Terrell Owens — either they hold out or they speak out in their quests for new contracts, and only Westbrook, only the Eagles' most valuable offensive player, was successful in getting the Birds to blink first.

"I've learned that speaking out doesn't do anything around here," Smith said. "If anything, it darkens the situation. You may think you're bringing attention to yourself in a good way, but it doesn't help. So it's definitely not an option. I'll approach it like I would any other year."

As a professional.

"I hope for the best," he continued. "I mean, you've never heard a player say, "I can't wait to get out of Philly.' It's a great place to play, and they know that, and too bad every organization isn't like this. The grass isn't always greener. I'm definitely not trying to get out of town, but this is just reality."

No holdout, then. No public lobbying. He'll play, and he'll hope that something happens soon, and if nothing does, L.J. Smith won't be shocked. It'll just be reality. It'll just be the Eagles.

Mike Sielski is the sports columnist for Calkins Media. E-mail him at msielski@phillyBurbs.com.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on May 18, 2007, 10:22:31 AM
Keeping with the Eagles f/o conspiracy theory: around game 5 he'll start to lose significant playing time while Schoebel starts.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on May 18, 2007, 10:24:04 AM
QuoteIf not, there are 31 other teams who'll be happy to have him."

Comments like that hurt my farging head.

No, jackass... 31 other teams won't be happy to have him because half of them have tight ends who are better or at least as good as your client.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: phattymatty on May 18, 2007, 10:38:33 AM
i didn't even know donovan had a daughter.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on May 18, 2007, 11:04:11 AM
That article said a whole lot of nothing we didn't already know.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on May 19, 2007, 12:31:20 PM
Hmmm... don't know what to make of this:

QuoteIs McNabb a Man of the People?

by Andy Schwartz
ComcastSportsNet.com

PHOENIXVILLE, Pa. – In Jeff Garcia's eight games as quarterback, the Eagles learned the value of a balanced offense. In Jeff Garcia's eight games as quarterback, Donovan McNabb learned something too.

McNabb won't be altering what he does on the field. Instead, he appears to be trying to change his image off it. Garcia quickly became a fan favorite not only because of his play but also because of his personality. Players loved Garcia's intensity. Fans loved his emotion. The media loved his honesty and availability.

   The Point After
   
ACL update
On Friday, Donovan McNabb said he has been able to do some running and cutting on his surgically repaired right knee.

"It doesn't swell up. It gets tight later. You ice it again and get ready for the next day," said McNabb, who had his ACL repaired last Nov. 28.

"The knee's getting better. You've still got to be patient. One day you may feel like you can do everything, and the next day it just starts to bother you. You just have to challenge yourself throughout this whole off-season, this whole training time to be faced with a lot of different things."

Fighting Diabetes
On June 15, the inaugural Donovan McNabb Foundation Golf Classic will be held at the RiverCrest Golf Club to benefit the American Diabetes Association.
Meanwhile McNabb seemingly has suffered from Mike Schmidt Syndrome. If Garcia is the gritty, grimy Lenny Dykstra, then McNabb is Schmidt, who won gold glove after gold glove and hit home run after home run – and made it look remarkably easy.

In that respect, McNabb may always be closer to Schmidt than Dykstra. But that doesn't mean the Eagles' quarterback of the last eight years can't change his image.

On Friday, in an unusual if not unprecedented event, McNabb held a cookout (burgers, hot dogs, sausages, steak, various salads, watermelon gazpacho – but sadly, no ice cream sundae bar) for the local media at the RiverCrest Golf Club in Phoenixville, Pa. Like a groom at a wedding, McNabb socialized with everyone, venturing from table to table. It was an odd opportunity to see McNabb up close, for the majority of his access comes in a news conference setting.

"Doing this is important to him because he spent eight years seeing [the media] sitting behind a podium," said McNabb's publicist Rich Burg, who recently took the job after being dismissed from the Eagles' media relations department. "That's an image that's projected sometimes in what you write or in what people see on TV – that he's on a pedestal. He shouldn't be on a pedestal.

"What works in this town is that Donovan is hopefully portrayed – and hopefully he lives his life this way – [as] one of the people. That he's no different than you or me or Joe fan or whatever. He wants to bring a championship to Philadelphia while he's the quarterback. Everybody really has the same agenda. But yet, for some reason people think that he's not one of them. I don't know why, exactly."

McNabb, however, doesn't appear bothered by his image.

"I don't feel like I have to change anything of how I'm perceived," McNabb said after taking a few hacks on the driving range. "Hopefully I'm perceived in a positive light. You want to be looked upon as a role model, a human being, a guy that works hard to be the best at what he can do and win championships. Not everybody can win the Super Bowl. Hopefully we'll be able to do that this year and be able to hold up that trophy and look forward to doing it again next year."

That said, McNabb wants to be known for more than being just a football player.

"A lot of people may just look at me as just the quarterback of the team, and they kind of just leave it at that," he said. "They've got to understand I was more than just a quarterback. I'm a father, a husband, a caring person that loves kids and is willing to do whatever I can do to help the next man out. If they are willing to look further into it, then they'll see I am a caring person."

Sometimes McNabb doesn't like when people look too far into things. Recently, he not only hired a personal publicist but also, in what were his first public comments since the draft, chose to hold interviews with a select few outside of the team's practice facility.

Was McNabb trying to make a statement, trying to squash the popular perception that he's a company man?

"This isn't a situation where I'm trying to stand out away from the team," McNabb said. "When I spoke at that time, I thought it was the best time to speak and also to get the word out. It wasn't a situation where I needed to involve everybody. Once the word was out, everybody heard it, and we were able to move on. My main purpose for that was to get the word out so that Kevin [Kolb] wouldn't have to come in and answer questions. He can just focus in on just playing football. The team didn't have to worry about what I said. It was out. Everybody heard it. Everybody knew what was going on. They could just focus in on that camp."

But why do it at the Flyers' practice facility instead of the Eagles'?

"I felt like it was best that I just got out when the time was there, and where that time was, it was in Jersey," he said. "Not to take anything away from the Eagles. I wasn't trying to say, 'Hey, look, I'm my own man.' I'm my own man anyway. I'm a player, yes, and I work for the Eagles. Everybody was looking at it too deep. There was nothing there to reach for. Yes, I didn't do it at NovaCare. I did it somewhere else. But the word got out, and the message was sent."

As for being a company man, McNabb doesn't seem too bothered by the label.

"Again, people look to deep into stuff," he said. "If my teammates look at me as a company man, hey, in order to be in the company, you have to do what's right by that company, or you'll be out of that company. It is what it is. When you play the position that I play, you can be looked upon as so many things. I'm sure just the way that I'm portrayed or people try to portray me as the company man or part of management – I'm sure Peyton [Manning] gets the same thing. I'm sure [Tom] Brady gets the same thing. Carson Palmer gets the same thing. So the list goes on of the franchise guys because they say we get more things or better things than everybody else."

Along those lines, McNabb said his relationship with head coach Andy Reid is fine. He said once again, people are digging for something that isn't there.

"My relationship probably is better than it was before," McNabb said. "We were able to talk about a lot of different issues. Obviously with the issue we've been faced with, drafting a quarterback – that's probably what everybody wants to know. But I think with the situation that he's been a part of, obviously with his family, I was there for him. I called him and talked to him or [text messaged] him or whatever to let him know that, hey, if he needed anything, I was there. I think with our communication after that whole situation and even after the draft, we were able to talk about other things. ... We talk all of the time."


Why the PR offensive all of a sudden?  Does McNabb think his company man image is really going to change just because he holds a news conference at a hockey rink and tosses on some barbeque for the local hacks?

Why bother at all?

Just plain weirdness here.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on May 19, 2007, 12:48:14 PM
clearly he had the press conference in NJ because the eagles wouldnt allow him to hold one at novacare...good for donovan

it doesnt mean theres some terrible rift btwn him and the front office...it just means he finally cut the puppet strings....thats a good thing imo
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MDS on May 19, 2007, 01:26:49 PM
I know this Andy Schwartz guy. No.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on May 19, 2007, 03:31:16 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on May 19, 2007, 12:48:14 PM
clearly he had the press conference in NJ because the eagles wouldnt allow him to hold one at novacare...good for donovan

it doesnt mean theres some terrible rift btwn him and the front office...it just means he finally cut the puppet strings....thats a good thing imo

You're crazy if you really think, based on his last interview and this pr gag, that McNabb is suddenly the prodigal son.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: phattymatty on May 19, 2007, 05:02:44 PM
theres video of the whole lito-fred taylor airplane dealy.  not nearly as scary as it sounded.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SwA8sL_evIM&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Flarrybrownsports%2Ecom%2F2007%2F05%2F19%2Fvideo%2Dof%2Dfred%2Dtaylors%2Dafrica%2Dplane%2Dflight%2Dnear%2Ddeath%2Dexperience%2F (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SwA8sL_evIM&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Flarrybrownsports%2Ecom%2F2007%2F05%2F19%2Fvideo%2Dof%2Dfred%2Dtaylors%2Dafrica%2Dplane%2Dflight%2Dnear%2Ddeath%2Dexperience%2F)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: shorebird on May 19, 2007, 05:07:16 PM
QuoteWas McNabb trying to make a statement, trying to squash the popular perception that he's a company man?
I think the drafting of Kevin Kolb did that. If he ever was, he isn't anymore.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on May 19, 2007, 05:46:02 PM
Donut Don McKee thinks the Eagles should trade McNabb for Briggzzzz
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MadMarchHare on May 19, 2007, 06:42:51 PM
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA!

heh.  Will they throw in Urlakker?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on May 19, 2007, 07:04:17 PM
Every time I hear McKee on the radio I picture Chief Wiggum doing a radio show.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on May 19, 2007, 07:10:54 PM
mckee needs to be put down
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on May 19, 2007, 07:13:17 PM
Rob Charry too.

Last week he wanted Favre and a #1 for McNabb.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on May 19, 2007, 07:14:08 PM
i dislike Martorano the most though
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on May 19, 2007, 07:27:33 PM
if i had more confidence in the eagles not blowing the pick id trade mcnabb right now for gb's one
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: mussa on May 19, 2007, 08:49:39 PM
Quote from: phattymatty on May 19, 2007, 05:02:44 PM
theres video of the whole lito-fred taylor airplane dealy.  not nearly as scary as it sounded.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SwA8sL_evIM&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Flarrybrownsports%2Ecom%2F2007%2F05%2F19%2Fvideo%2Dof%2Dfred%2Dtaylors%2Dafrica%2Dplane%2Dflight%2Dnear%2Ddeath%2Dexperience%2F (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SwA8sL_evIM&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Flarrybrownsports%2Ecom%2F2007%2F05%2F19%2Fvideo%2Dof%2Dfred%2Dtaylors%2Dafrica%2Dplane%2Dflight%2Dnear%2Ddeath%2Dexperience%2F)

what happened? i never heard?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MDS on May 19, 2007, 11:00:30 PM
Why the hell are you fools wasting your time listening to WIP?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on May 20, 2007, 12:48:00 AM
WIP is cool. You can win Eskin and Missanelli keychains and WIP prize packs.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: phattymatty on May 20, 2007, 09:56:00 AM
Quote from: mussa on May 19, 2007, 08:49:39 PM
Quote from: phattymatty on May 19, 2007, 05:02:44 PM
theres video of the whole lito-fred taylor airplane dealy.  not nearly as scary as it sounded.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SwA8sL_evIM&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Flarrybrownsports%2Ecom%2F2007%2F05%2F19%2Fvideo%2Dof%2Dfred%2Dtaylors%2Dafrica%2Dplane%2Dflight%2Dnear%2Ddeath%2Dexperience%2F (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SwA8sL_evIM&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Flarrybrownsports%2Ecom%2F2007%2F05%2F19%2Fvideo%2Dof%2Dfred%2Dtaylors%2Dafrica%2Dplane%2Dflight%2Dnear%2Ddeath%2Dexperience%2F)

what happened? i never heard?

lito and fred taylor and some other people were on some kind of vacation in africa, and there was a story about the door to their plane popping open it flight.  made it seem real scary and movie-like.  but in that video they all seem to be just chillin.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on May 20, 2007, 12:04:09 PM
Here's that McKee article:

QuoteA McNabb trade (in theory)
By Don McKee
Inquirer Columnist


One of Incites' most important roles in the media mix called Philadelphia is to pass along stories that are under-reported elsewhere.

So while cautioning you that this scenario is strictly the inner thought of one of the area's most sage football observers, here's one compelling theory:

The recent drafting of quarterback Kevin Kolb could mean that Donovan McNabb will be traded before the 2007 season.

A few observers have opined that McNabb will be moved after the coming season. But here's a scenario that has him moving before September.

The Chicago Bears are ready to win the Super Bowl. They might have won it last year except for a glaring weakness at quarterback. Before the ever-popular "window" closes, the Bears need a quality QB to kick them over the hump.

This scenario obviously depends on two things. One, that McNabb is physically ready to play on Week 1 of the 2007 season. Two, that Chicago is convinced McNabb is their best available QB option.

(The fact that McNabb is from Chicago is, in my mind, irrelevant. The Bears would be just as interested in an available quality veteran if he were from Portland, Tucson or Montreal.)

But the key to this scenario is Bears linebacker Lance Briggs, who has said publicly that he will never play for Chicago again and who refused to report to minicamp on Friday.

Briggs is, arguably, the best weakside linebacker in the game and is only 26.

The question most Eagles fans are asking right now is: Why would the Bears make that deal?

It would give them a chance to save face, by sending Briggs where the team wants to send him and not be seen as having Briggs dictate to them. Plus, they would get a vital component of any Super Bowl team in exchange for a player who says he won't show up.

The Eagles, of course, would then have rebuilt their defense to the point where it could carry an offense managed by A.J. Feeley or Kelly Holcomb, while awaiting the development of Kolb.

If you asked the Eagles about this they would, naturally, laugh it off. The key for the Birds in any trade scenario is to appear totally neutral while listening to offers. It's always best to have the player everybody else wants, then choose the best offer.

Is it going to happen? Right now, it's just a thought. But if McNabb shows up in July and begins tearing up training camp, the offers are sure to soon follow.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Dillen on May 20, 2007, 12:08:01 PM
QuoteIs it going to happen? Right now, it's just a thought. But if McNabb shows up in July and begins tearing up training camp, the offers are sure to soon follow.

Agreed. If McNabb does well in training camp, his entire track record goes out the window but teams will be lining up to trade for him when he proves he can practice pretty well.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Philly Crew on May 21, 2007, 01:00:07 PM
Quote from: BigEd76 on May 20, 2007, 12:04:09 PM
Here's that McKee article:

QuoteA McNabb trade (in theory)
By Don McKee
Inquirer Columnist



The question most Eagles fans are asking right now is: Why would the Bears make that deal?


Actually, I think the question is why trade a franchise QB for a LB?  WIP?  Sorry, there is my explanation.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyGirl on May 21, 2007, 09:02:32 PM
Seriously, this rumor shtein is ridiculous and now its a top story on Yahoo.com's Rumor Has It section....yes, it came from McKee's dumbfarg article, but the fact that its now being spewed everywhere makes me cringe.

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/rumors/post/Super-shuffle-McNabb-Briggs-swap-makes-sense?urn=nfl,33381
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Zanshin on May 22, 2007, 09:14:48 AM
It's too retarded to even think about.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: phillymic2000 on May 22, 2007, 10:10:23 PM
Espn radio was a buzz this afternoon in Chicago about this trade, one host Dan MacNeil thought the Eagles would get the better of the trade. My favorite caller stated that McNabb wouldn't fit this offense of stretching the field, "McNabb doesn't throw the long ball for big plays"  :-D I love idiots.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyGirl on May 23, 2007, 08:48:00 AM
WHY WHY WHY is this being talked about?

Who would be our farging quarterback you dumb, farging, bumbling idiots!?!?!?!

Kevin Kolb's going to magically jump in and start for this offense?

OK.  ::) :boom :boom :boom
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MURP on May 23, 2007, 09:10:56 AM
I hear Doug Pederson is on the market.   
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on May 23, 2007, 09:16:48 AM
Quote from: PhillyGirl on May 23, 2007, 08:48:00 AM
WHY WHY WHY is this being talked about?

Who would be our farging quarterback you dumb, farging, bumbling idiots!?!?!?!

Kevin Kolb's going to magically jump in and start for this offense?

OK.  ::) :boom :boom :boom

A.J. Feeley was just given a contract extension and has proven himself to be serviceable in this offense.  Kelly Holcomb is up in years but can sling it around a bit.  Kolb would still be the 3rd stringer this year even with McNabb gone.

Now, before you flip your lid and hit me with all the anger and rolling of eyes and whatnot, you should know that I think the rumor is absolute garbage and there is zero chance it happens.  However, among the reasons it has some "legs" with the media (aside from just headline-grabbing) is because it would not be a completely implausible deal to the casual observer.

As usual, you just need to chill out a bit.  Wouldn't you rather the media's whipping up a frenzy about a ridiculous trade rumor than giving us more hard-hitting coverage about the Saints' feel-good story or the 30 free agents signed by the Patriots this off-season?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on May 23, 2007, 09:55:05 AM
the who would be the qb question is not the issue here...its the fact that the eagles would be getting a ultra expensive possibly overrated product of who hes plays with linebacker in return...thats why the trade is ridiculous...not because of some huge hole that would open at the qb position

the eagles have proven again and again they can win without mcnabb...trading him is not out of the realm of possibility..trading him for a positon that the eagles have refused to properly address in the reid era is insane

just as an example...mcnabb for a high #1 pick in my mind is something that i would consider

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on May 23, 2007, 09:56:35 AM
On NFL-N tonight they have a scrambling QB show on. Randall and McNabb made the top 10. Eskin and Cataldi provided commentary for the piece.

I forgot how much I loved watching Randall play back in the day. I was thinking about some of the plays he made and even though he was a half-wit with the offense, he was amazing to watch.

Speaking of Randall, remember when he got hurt in NY and Eric Allen picked off the ball and made that great return and then flipped the ball to Randall? Awesome.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: DH on May 23, 2007, 06:21:48 PM
Came back from down 21-0 in that game to pull it out.

Allen musta run that thing back 140 yards when it was all said and done.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: General_Failure on May 23, 2007, 06:58:05 PM
I'm gonna go ahead and get my Holcomb jersey now.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on May 24, 2007, 07:54:40 PM
Someone asked Spadaro if Moats was involved in the camp for rookies & select vets today.  Swear to God, this was his response:

QuoteNo Moats. I see a lot of second-year players. Moats has been around long enough to know the offense.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on May 24, 2007, 09:04:55 PM
if I wanted to read Spadaro, I'd go to pe.com

you people need to drop the sad fixation
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on May 24, 2007, 09:18:43 PM
i almost wanna call bullshtein on that remey...but at this point i cant put anything past dave....so instead ill throw out the standard "even for spadaro" thats an unbelievable comment
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on May 24, 2007, 09:48:56 PM
Quote from: Diomedes on May 24, 2007, 09:04:55 PM
if I wanted to read Spadaro, I'd go to pe.com

you people need to drop the sad fixation

Quotes like that reveal the mindset of the organization, Dio.  I mean, here's a guy who, by all accounts, hasn't gotten onto the field because of his apparent inability to master the intracacies of the offense.

Yet someone from the organization actually posts that in response.

Talk about insulting our intelligence.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: General_Failure on May 24, 2007, 10:41:32 PM
That's. His. Job. Insulting your intelligence is his job.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Munson on May 25, 2007, 04:22:21 AM
WEll his job is tits and I hope he dies. Or just gets fired. Like a bnabitch.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: General_Failure on May 25, 2007, 04:43:41 AM
I hope you die.; In afire. Wtih drunk typing..
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on May 25, 2007, 09:16:28 PM
WEll his job is tits and I hope he dies. Or just gets fired. Like a bnabitch.


bwahahaha....classic
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on June 04, 2007, 09:58:14 AM
McNabb made his first ever in-studio appearance on WIP's morning show today.  He finally acknowledged that yeah, they should've hurried a little more in the final 5 minutes of the Super Bowl.  There will probably be a podcast/download on WIP's site at some point but I can't check from work...
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on June 04, 2007, 10:03:44 AM
Spadaro posting at 12:30am:

QuoteI am here because I am not sleeping right now. I have a gravely ill father in the next room and I am waiting for him to pass. So I can't sleep and I can't write and I am watching TV and doing this. We all grieve differently ....

:-\
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: General_Failure on June 04, 2007, 01:34:07 PM
Someone's gotta say it. He's dying of shame. There, now nobody else has to feel uncomfortable.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MDS on June 04, 2007, 01:35:47 PM
The dead fathers are fine.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on June 04, 2007, 07:22:54 PM
McNabb interview, part 1 (http://podcast.610wip.com/wip/504750.mp3)
McNabb interview, part 2 (http://podcast.610wip.com/wip/504806.mp3)

Reid interview (http://podcast.610wip.com/wip/504815.mp3)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on June 05, 2007, 06:58:52 PM
-- Schobel strained a hamstring today.  Celek time!

-- Perry Patterson signed.  No idea why.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: paco on June 05, 2007, 07:22:59 PM
Quote from: BigEd76 on June 04, 2007, 10:03:44 AM
Spadaro posting at 12:30am:

QuoteI am here because I am not sleeping right now. I have a gravely ill father in the next room and I am waiting for him to pass. So I can't sleep and I can't write and I am watching TV and doing this. We all grieve differently ....

:-\

Looks like he just passed away

QuoteLouis A. Of West Chester, Pa. On June 4, 2007. Beloved husband of Betty Bristol and the late Lorraine (Nee Mahoney) Spadaro. Father of Edward L., Carl L., Ann L. Ciliberto, and David L. Spadaro. Brother of the late Gloria Weber. Also survived by his 6 grandchildren. Mr. Spadaro had attended Wesley College in Delaware, he also served in the United States Navy on the USS Marcos Island during World War II. Mr. Spadaro was employed by Westinghouse in Lester, Pa. For over 40 years. He was born in Yeadon, however Mr. Spadaro was a longtime West Chester resident.
Relatives and Friends are invited to a graveside service Wednesday at 10:30 am in Fernwood Cemetery Baltimore Ave. Lansdowne. In lieu of flowers an offering in Mr. Spadaro's name to the American Cancer Society 1615 West Chester Pike West Chester, Pa. 19382 would be appreciated.(www.stretchfuneralhome.com)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on June 05, 2007, 09:20:57 PM
Brian Dawkins currently leads the Eagles 75th Anniversary Team Free Safety poll on PE.com.  He's amassed 93.6% of the votes thus far.

http://museum.philadelphiaeagles.com/freesafetypoll.asp

:-D
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on June 05, 2007, 10:21:56 PM
Special Player, and i would definitely say the best to play the position in team history.  Not just what he has done stat wise but what he has brought to the franchise and Defense in his career. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on June 05, 2007, 10:46:40 PM

(http://a359.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/22/l_3506ec7a3191b7eb2300ca996f25f34e.jpg)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on June 05, 2007, 11:10:03 PM
Look at this farging guy. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: paco on June 05, 2007, 11:27:44 PM
EL what?   
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: mussa on June 06, 2007, 01:36:55 AM
andrews jersey is on the list of must have's along with killa 58 this year.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: General_Failure on June 06, 2007, 03:49:13 AM
Got mine his rookie season. The fact that he's batshtein crazy is a bonus.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on June 06, 2007, 06:30:37 AM
brother needs to cut back on the antibiotic...you want a very thin layer, so that your new tattoo is almost dry....not a great slick slobbering of the stuff...skin has to breathe to heal.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on June 06, 2007, 07:10:25 AM
That's a bad motherfarger right there...
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on June 06, 2007, 07:39:07 AM
Andrews big pimpin'....  :-D

(http://a778.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/01171/77/78/1171018777_l.jpg)

(http://a329.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/43/l_78e0adcc5523339e44608705e91fb2c8.jpg)


HE LOOKS LIKE THE THING!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on June 06, 2007, 07:58:08 AM
Stiff brimmed hats have got to be the dumbest shtein ever.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on June 06, 2007, 08:02:45 AM
brother needs to cut back on the antibiotic...you want a very thin layer, so that your new tattoo is almost dry....not a great slick slobbering of the stuff...skin has to breathe to heal.


its almost certainly vaseline
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on June 06, 2007, 08:08:17 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on June 06, 2007, 08:02:45 AM
brother needs to cut back on the antibiotic...you want a very thin layer, so that your new tattoo is almost dry....not a great slick slobbering of the stuff...skin has to breathe to heal.


its almost certainly vaseline

I assume you're kidding...
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on June 06, 2007, 08:09:41 AM
no...even tho i dont believe youre supposed to put vaseline on them tons of people do...and my money is that andrews did as well
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on June 06, 2007, 08:11:45 AM
Well tons of people are idiots then. They practically shove that antibiotic ointment down your throat when you get inked up. shtein's expensive but it does the trick.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MURP on June 06, 2007, 10:53:45 AM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on June 05, 2007, 10:46:40 PM

(http://a359.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/22/l_3506ec7a3191b7eb2300ca996f25f34e.jpg)




Andrews is going to be the most bad ass dude on the team (behind Dawkins ;)  )  Or he will be a total wack job ala Ricky Williams.  Flip a coin.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on June 06, 2007, 11:12:41 AM
I like the "new" Andrews. Dude is a fargin beast.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: phattymatty on June 06, 2007, 11:17:57 AM
i hope they change his number this year.  imagine how nuts dude will be then.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on June 06, 2007, 11:58:45 AM
Perry Patterson was released already  :-D
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on June 06, 2007, 03:51:22 PM
What was even the point in signing him? What the hell is going on?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: General_Failure on June 06, 2007, 05:34:54 PM
Quote from: MURP on June 06, 2007, 10:53:45 AM
Andrews is going to be the most bad ass dude on the team (behind Dawkins ;)  )  Or he will be a total wack job ala Ricky Williams.  Flip a coin.

My coin landed on the side, rolled down the hall, and stopped behind the entertainment center. What does that mean?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on June 06, 2007, 05:49:41 PM
that you should go not watch Hudson Hawk again?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: paco on June 06, 2007, 07:00:57 PM
Quote from: MURP on June 06, 2007, 10:53:45 AM


Andrews is going to be the most bad ass dude on the team (behind Dawkins ;)  )  Or he will be a total wack job ala Ricky Williams.  Flip a coin.

I think Runyan should get a nod as well. 
(http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c210/mshane73/RunyanOwningMadison.gif)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: General_Failure on June 06, 2007, 09:25:35 PM
Quote from: SunMo on June 06, 2007, 05:49:41 PM
that you should go not watch Hudson Hawk again?

Would you like to not swing on a star? Not carry moonbeams home in a jar?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on June 08, 2007, 01:55:34 PM
Anger!

QuoteThere are others to consider strongly, including Jeremy Bloom, who is having a very good spring, and Bill Sampy, a young second-year player ready to make a real push.

"Feel-good" losers like this Sampy kid piss me off to no end.  He has zero chance to ever do anything meaningful in the NFL.  farging Spadaro.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Magical_Retard on June 08, 2007, 03:36:27 PM
a young 2nd year player?

is there any other kind of 2nd year player? ive never heard of a "OLD" 2nd year player.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Geowhizzer on June 08, 2007, 03:39:16 PM
Quote from: Magical_Retard on June 08, 2007, 03:36:27 PM
a young 2nd year player?

is there any other kind of 2nd year player? ive never heard of a "OLD" 2nd year player.



Vince Papale was an old 2nd year player...
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: methdeez on June 08, 2007, 04:35:22 PM
Chris Weinke, Mike Anderson, Ben Graham, Greg Truitt, ask a stupd question...
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on June 08, 2007, 07:26:17 PM
Video clips from McNabb's appearance on Daily News Live:

the knee (http://philadelphia.comcastsportsnet.com/media/video/eagles/060807-mcnabb1.wmv)

what still needs healing (http://philadelphia.comcastsportsnet.com/media/video/eagles/060807-mcnabb2.wmv)

on being labelled "injury prone" (http://philadelphia.comcastsportsnet.com/media/video/eagles/060807-mcnabb3.wmv)

the draft and Kolb (http://philadelphia.comcastsportsnet.com/media/video/eagles/060807-mcnabb4.wmv)

Eagles are the team to beat (http://philadelphia.comcastsportsnet.com/media/video/eagles/060807-mcnabb5.wmv)

Philly doesn't know him (http://philadelphia.comcastsportsnet.com/media/video/eagles/060807-mcnabb6.wmv)

the WRs (http://philadelphia.comcastsportsnet.com/media/video/eagles/060807-mcnabb7.wmv)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MDS on June 08, 2007, 08:15:32 PM
Anything interesting?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on June 08, 2007, 08:46:22 PM
Yeah, McNabb said "Unfortunately, I'm black, but..."
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on June 08, 2007, 10:07:40 PM
That douche McNabb better win us a farging Super Bowl.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MDS on June 09, 2007, 12:47:57 AM
He's tried a bunch of times. He's failed a bunch of times. Start Holcumb.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on June 09, 2007, 07:52:53 PM
ha
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyandBCEagles on June 10, 2007, 11:57:01 AM
Andrews looks jacked in those pics.  No more pushing 400.  Great to see.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on June 11, 2007, 01:14:54 PM
McNabb returns to practice with Eagles
BY INQUIRER STAFF
Quarterback Donovan McNabb practiced with the Eagles this morning for the first time since tearing his anterior cruciate ligament on Nov. 19, 2006.

McNabb worked non-contact drills with the first-team offense starting at 11:10 a.m., and appeared to be fine when he walked off the field with team trainer Rick Burkholder at 12:03 p.m.

The Eagles placed the 31-year-old quarterback on injured reserve on Nov. 21, 2006, after suffering a torn ACL in the Eagles' Nov. 19 loss to Tennessee Titans. McNabb missed the final six games of the 2006 regular season and the Eagles' two playoff games. He has been present during the offseason training activities, but has not participated in practice until today.

When asked about McNabb's progress last Tuesday, Eagles coach Andy Reid said: "He's trying to be smart with it and keep the swelling out of there, which he's done a great job with and he's working like crazy. We're just giving him little steps to take to still be productive until his return."

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on June 11, 2007, 02:20:49 PM
who can spot the error?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on June 11, 2007, 02:43:17 PM
He's 30.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on June 11, 2007, 04:46:44 PM
Quote from: BigEd76 on June 11, 2007, 02:20:49 PM
who can spot the error?

I saw it as soon as I read it.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: methdeez on June 11, 2007, 05:06:22 PM
Quote from: SunMo on June 11, 2007, 01:14:54 PM
McNabb returns to practice with Eagles
BY INQUIRER STAFF
Quarterback Donovan McNabb practiced with the Eagles this morning for the first time since tearing his anterior cruciate ligament on Nov. 19, 2006.

McNabb worked non-contact drills with the first-team offense starting at 11:10 a.m., and appeared to be fine when he walked off the field with team trainer Rick Burkholder at 12:03 p.m.

The Eagles placed the 31-year-old quarterback on injured reserve on Nov. 21, 2006, after suffering a torn ACL in the Eagles' Nov. 19 loss to Tennessee Titans. McNabb missed the final six games of the 2006 regular season and the Eagles' two playoff games. He has been present during the offseason training activities, but has not participated in practice until today.

When asked about McNabb's progress last Tuesday, Eagles coach Andy Reid said: "He's trying to be smart with it and keep the swelling out of there, which he's done a great job with and he's working like crazy. We're just giving him little steps to take to still be productive until his return."

Wait, I found it: "When asked about McNabb's progress last Tuesday, Eagles coach Andy Reid said: "We'll make the best of it, but I wish we still had Jeff Garcia."
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on June 11, 2007, 05:19:53 PM
Quote from: BigEd76 on June 11, 2007, 02:20:49 PM
who can spot the error?

Donovan and Burkholder walked off the field at 12:04 p.m., not 12:03 p.m..  Duh.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Don Ho on June 11, 2007, 10:28:25 PM
Quote from: Diomedes on June 11, 2007, 05:19:53 PM
Quote from: BigEd76 on June 11, 2007, 02:20:49 PM
who can spot the error?

Donovan and Burkholder walked off the field at 12:04 p.m., not 12:03 p.m..  Duh.

:-D
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyandBCEagles on June 13, 2007, 12:58:32 AM
Quote from: SunMo on June 11, 2007, 01:14:54 PM
When asked about McNabb's progress last Tuesday, Eagles coach Andy Reid said: "He's trying to be smart with it and keep the swelling out of there, which he's done a great job with and he's working like crazy. We're just giving him little steps to take to still be productive until his return."

The question is, when is McNabb going to be able to get in the mix and compete out there??
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Phanatic on June 13, 2007, 01:19:15 AM
Quote from: PhillyandBCEagles on June 13, 2007, 12:58:32 AM
Quote from: SunMo on June 11, 2007, 01:14:54 PM
When asked about McNabb's progress last Tuesday, Eagles coach Andy Reid said: "He's trying to be smart with it and keep the swelling out of there, which he's done a great job with and he's working like crazy. We're just giving him little steps to take to still be productive until his return."

The question is, when is McNabb going to be able to get in the mix and compete out there??

It doesn't matter... We have Kolb!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: mussa on June 13, 2007, 11:41:28 AM
Start Feely
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on June 13, 2007, 11:46:41 AM
He is still the starter right now.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: methdeez on June 13, 2007, 12:25:17 PM
Quote from: FastFreddie on June 13, 2007, 11:46:41 AM
He is still the starter right now.

Quiet, wiseguy. Nobody likes the truth.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on June 13, 2007, 12:27:59 PM
His QB rating last year was 122.9.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on June 13, 2007, 12:28:48 PM
QuoteHoward eager to have bang-up season at defensive end
By STEVE KING
kings@phillynews.com

JESSICA GRIFFIN/Daily News
Defensive end Darren Howard is showing an increased work ethic at minicamp.
RELATED STORIES
Rich Hofmann | McNabb & Reid need to be in same time-frame zone
Pacman drops appeal of yearlong suspension
Darren Howard believes he has nothing to prove. He doesn't have a chip on his shoulder and doesn't need anyone to tell him how much he needs to improve on his 35 tackles and five sacks last season to be an effective member of the Eagles' defensive front.
Howard knows this, which is part of the reason he has that look of hunger and fire at minicamp at the NovaCare Complex.

"If this was a few years ago, then, yes, I would feel as if I had some things to prove," Howard said. "But I've been in the league for 8 years and the only thing I want to do is show up every day, make sure my name is on that roster and do whatever I have to do to help my team out."

Last year, the defensive end fell short statistically. In 2005, his final season with the New Orleans Saints, Howard recorded 33 tackles and forced two fumbles through 12 games. At that pace, Howard said he expected to get back to 50-plus tackles last season, as he did in his first two seasons out of Kansas State with the Saints. Howard had 51 tackles in 2000 and 53 in 2001.

Eagles defensive coordinator Jim Johnson said the coaching staff could be as much at fault in the decline of Howard's numbers last season as Howard.

After Jevon Kearse was lost for the season in Week 2 with a left-knee injury, the Eagles were left with Trent Cole and Howard on the left side. Cole had never played the position in his 2 years in the league and Howard had limited experience there.

Howard, who said he was more comfortable on the right side, said that although he felt he was at a disadvantage, it was the right move for the team.

That attitude, along with Howard's increased work ethic, has Johnson sold on Howard having a huge season. Yesterday and Monday, Howard was taking extra sideline sprints at the end of practice, along with additional weight-room work. He said his offseason workouts included pickup basketball, where he focused on improving his agility.

"Once you get out here in these minicamps, you really find out what kind of shape you are in," the 6-3, 275-pound Howard said.

"You can't come out here and fake it and think you're in good shape, especially on this team, when you have to pass physical tests before you even enter training camp."

Howard, who was bothered by knee injuries last season but played in all 16 games, has split practice time with the first and second defense. He has shown no side effects of the injuries. Johnson said not only has Howard's health been improving, but his mind-set has remained positive, as well.

"I just see a real good attitude," Johnson said. "I'm sure he's disappointed from last season, because he's so used to having such good production, but these guys have to realize that every year, whether you want to believe it or not, they get older and you have to push yourself harder and harder in order to stay on top of the game."



The day after
For the second consecutive day, Donovan McNabb participated in minicamp. McNabb, who left practice about 30 minutes early for treatment to his right knee, did not appear to show any signs of stress in his second full day of workouts since tearing his ACL on Nov. 19 at Lincoln Financial Field.

For the second consecutive day, Donovan McNabb participated in minicamp. McNabb, who left practice about 30 minutes early for treatment to his right knee, did not appear to show any signs of stress in his second full day of workouts since tearing his ACL on Nov. 19 at Lincoln Financial Field.
While McNabb eases his way back, a teammate who is an expert in knee injuries has been a helpful resource to McNabb.

Running back Correll Buckhalter said he has been somewhat of an inspiration to McNabb. He said he talked to McNabb when the quarterback was hurt and let him know that if he could come back from three knee surgeries, it should be a breeze for McNabb to come back from one.

"I told him right now he is pretty much over the hump of the hard part," Buckhalter said. "Once you get past that fourth and fifth month, you're pretty much on the right track and ready to get back on the field. And we all see how bad he wanted to get back on the field."



Birdseed
Before the end of practice yesterday, offensive tackle Winston Justice and defensive end Marques Murrell got into a tussle in which a helmet was thrown after the fight was cleared. Murrell said afterward that Justice was just trying to bully the rookie free agent from Appalachian State. "Man, he was just trying to be funny. I'm not about to let no man push me around, so I just had to show him that I was going to hold my ground," Murrell said . . . Kelly Holcomb threw two interceptions in a row that bounced off an offensive lineman and fell into the hands of defensive tackle Ian Scott . . . Linebacker Takeo Spikes worked on hand-eye coordination with linebackers coach Sean McDermott by catching tennis balls with one hand while on his knees. *

Before the end of practice yesterday, offensive tackle Winston Justice and defensive end Marques Murrell got into a tussle in which a helmet was thrown after the fight was cleared. Murrell said afterward that Justice was just trying to bully the rookie free agent from Appalachian State. "Man, he was just trying to be funny. I'm not about to let no man push me around, so I just had to show him that I was going to hold my ground," Murrell said . . . Kelly Holcomb threw two interceptions in a row that bounced off an offensive lineman and fell into the hands of defensive tackle Ian Scott . . . Linebacker Takeo Spikes worked on hand-eye coordination with linebackers coach Sean McDermott by catching tennis balls with one hand while on his knees. *
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: methdeez on June 13, 2007, 02:37:35 PM
Was that artice written by johnny two-times?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: RezRob on June 13, 2007, 03:59:08 PM
 . . . Linebacker Takeo Spikes worked on hand-eye coordination with linebackers coach Sean McDermott by catching tennis balls with one hand while on his knees. *

Don't tell me Garcia didn't leave his mark on team and the training staff.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on June 13, 2007, 04:02:24 PM
Boooooooo.........
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Dillen on June 13, 2007, 06:02:19 PM
Quote from: EagleFeva on June 13, 2007, 04:02:24 PM
Boooooooo.........
Agreed. Really reaching on that one.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on June 14, 2007, 08:12:14 AM
gay jokes dont die they multiply
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MDS on June 14, 2007, 12:31:22 PM
Donovan Darius was cut. He's injured but might be healthy for training camp. He's probably better than Sean Considine. Any takers?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Dillen on June 14, 2007, 12:49:18 PM
He continually bitched about being franchise tagged and "only" getting $7M. He was a good player, but he's not near what he used to be, and he probably thinks he is.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Zanshin on June 14, 2007, 12:52:15 PM
Eagles won't pay him what he wants, or give him the contract length that he'd be after.  Only way they'd even sniff is if they think their SS situation sucks after what they've seen in camps thus far, or if he lands on the cheap-o scrapheap.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on June 14, 2007, 12:53:04 PM
Dawkins           +             Darius = Football BONER
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Magical_Retard on June 14, 2007, 01:10:42 PM
wont happen unless he decides to take a cheap 1 yr contract to prove himself. im sure other teams will offer him a better long term contract compared to anything the eagles would offer.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on June 14, 2007, 01:26:59 PM
They'd probably have the oldest starting tandem of safeties in the league if they signed Darius.

So sure, why not?

Get him!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Zanshin on June 14, 2007, 01:27:37 PM
Quote from: Seabiscuit36 on June 14, 2007, 12:53:04 PM
Dawkins           +             Darius = Football BONER

If it were 2001.  This year it would be more of a semi.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Magical_Retard on June 14, 2007, 01:30:27 PM
Quote from: Zanshin on June 14, 2007, 01:27:37 PM
Quote from: Seabiscuit36 on June 14, 2007, 12:53:04 PM
Dawkins           +             Darius = Football BONER

If it were 2001.  This year it would be more of a semi.

im sorry for your ED.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on June 14, 2007, 02:06:31 PM
z0MG SINE HIM!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ThirdStreetMafia on June 14, 2007, 02:46:36 PM
I'd be super shoked if the eagles sign him... the eagles (reguardless of our opinions) seem pretty hyped about mickell and shoot-me-up sean considine
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on June 14, 2007, 05:02:06 PM
Quote from: Magical_Retard on June 14, 2007, 01:30:27 PMim sorry for your ED.

:-\


OMGBROKENLEGBRIANWESTBROOK (http://thebiglead.com/?p=2552)

QuotePOSTED 4:04 p.m. EDT, June 14, 2007

FALSE RUMORS CIRCULATE OF WESTBROOK CRASH

Several readers have advised us of rampants rumors that Eagles running back Brian Westbrook has badly injured his leg in a motorcycle accident.

Fear not, Eagles fans.  A league source tells us that there was no accident, and that Westbrook is fine.

It's amazing how quickly these things can spread (e.g., Terry Bradshaw is dead) in this age of instantaneous digital information.  This time around, we're glad that we checked with someone who knows what's happening before we posted the rumor.

Then again, this is a rumor mill. . . .
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on June 14, 2007, 06:31:54 PM
 no thanks on Darius.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on June 16, 2007, 11:33:15 AM
(http://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/uploads/photos/perm/main/AKDAPFNNCPKG/07softball_1.jpg)

Gold.  Standard.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on June 16, 2007, 11:47:06 AM
how many of those chicks would you hit?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on June 16, 2007, 11:47:36 AM
Where's Baldy McHasnodad?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on June 16, 2007, 12:11:46 PM
No black softball players on team Lurie
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MDS on June 16, 2007, 06:06:44 PM
Lurie is a good player, actually. I wonder if the Eagles team could beat Lurie's synogouge softball team.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on June 18, 2007, 10:00:11 AM
QuoteGrossman likely not laughing over 'joke'

Tribune staff report

June 17, 2007, 10:16 PM CDT


The first time he mentioned the idea of Donovan McNabb playing for the Bears—and winning a Super Bowl—the media throng gathered around him let it go. Same for the second time ... and the third.

But by the time Bears defensive lineman Tommie Harris had floated the idea of Mt. Carmel's McNabb joining the Bears and ending their long Super Bowl championship hibernation, it was too much to let go. (Audiblizing an idea a half-dozen times will have that effect.)

Speaking this weekend from Philadelphia, where Harris was a guest of McNabb's at the quarterback's charity golf tournament, the D-lineman had this to say: "I'd love to have [McNabb] as my quarterback in Chicago. ... Hopefully, he comes here and helps the Chicago Bears win the Super Bowl. ... If he comes to Chicago, we'll definitely win the Super Bowl. ... He's my friend and I would like him to play on my team. ... I'd love him to play for the Bears."

He just kept going.

And Harris wasn't done, capping his comments with, "Hopefully we get Donovan."

Harris backtracked on Saturday on WSCR-AM 670, saying he was kidding and if incumbent starter Rex Grossman was offended, Harris would apologize.

That'll be five or six of them by last count.
And so the story gains steam again  :-D
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on June 18, 2007, 12:09:43 PM
Let's face it - even McNabb's biggest haters would admit he'd be a huge upgrade over any QB that's taken a snap in Chicago since... damn... McMahon?  Most people would say he'd immediately be the best QB EVER to play in Chicago.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on June 18, 2007, 12:11:37 PM
you're forgetting about a little piece of magic called The Erik Kramer Era

wow, he actually had a really good year in 1995

1995 chi |  16gp |   315comp   522att  60.3%  3838yds   7.4y/a  29td  10int
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on June 18, 2007, 12:20:03 PM
Quote from: SunMo on June 18, 2007, 12:11:37 PM
you're forgetting about a little piece of magic called The Erik Kramer Era

It's the style of your prose that makes you so special.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ThirdStreetMafia on June 18, 2007, 02:04:09 PM
Since my posting sucks so bad...
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on June 18, 2007, 02:16:32 PM
Safety combo of the future (http://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/homeNewsDetail.jsp?id=71217)

So, they draft the white one in the 4th round but wait until UDFA to get the black one the next year.

RACIST FO
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Mad-Lad on June 18, 2007, 05:18:24 PM
i heard adam sheffter (or whatever his name is) on the NFL Network say the Eagles were talking to Sammy Knight.  A camp body?  I can't image he can still play if he's not on a team already.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on June 18, 2007, 05:44:56 PM
Quote from: FastFreddie on June 18, 2007, 02:16:32 PM
Safety combo of the future (http://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/homeNewsDetail.jsp?id=71217)

So, they draft the white one in the 4th round but wait until UDFA to get the black one the next year.

RACIST FO
2 years later dook
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on June 18, 2007, 05:55:54 PM
I'd like to get Tommie Harris. Harris 4 McNabb straight up!!

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on June 18, 2007, 07:19:09 PM
Quote from: Mad-Lad on June 18, 2007, 05:18:24 PM
i heard adam sheffter (or whatever his name is) on the NFL Network say the Eagles were talking to Sammy Knight.  A camp body?  I can't image he can still play if he's not on a team already.

Considering the Eagles' current depth chart at safety, I think they could find a way to get Sammy Knight some playing time.  If you only want a "camp body", you usually sign a young guy.

That said, if he shows up and can't play, he'll go the way of Ed Jasper last year.


Quote from: Seabiscuit36 on June 18, 2007, 05:44:56 PM
2 years later dook

My bad.  I forgot that Considine was even MORE useless his rookie year.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Dillen on June 18, 2007, 07:38:42 PM
Quote from: Mad-Lad on June 18, 2007, 05:18:24 PM
i heard adam sheffter (or whatever his name is) on the NFL Network say the Eagles were talking to Sammy Knight.  A camp body?  I can't image he can still play if he's not on a team already.
He's only 31, I'm actually pretty surprised he isn't signed by anyone yet. He's a good run stopper and miles better at pass coverage than Lewis, but he has coverage limitations because he's pretty slow. He also has the same birthday as me. Kick ass.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on June 19, 2007, 07:35:52 AM
I dunno about "miles"... Knight's pass coverage falls into the zesty category as well.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on June 19, 2007, 01:15:08 PM
In the least shocking news of the offseason, Bartrum officially calls it a career.

http://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/homeNewsDetail.jsp?id=71256
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on June 19, 2007, 01:57:40 PM
if I were good, I could make a long snap joke here

i'm not good though, so i'll just take credit for not killing you with my awful attempts
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on June 19, 2007, 02:03:49 PM
you could've said...

It's probably a good thing he retired, because the only snap he had left was his neck.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on June 19, 2007, 02:05:05 PM
i was trying to work in something about how long it took him to snap the ball on the retirement playcall, or something like that.  i are suxor
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on June 19, 2007, 02:15:15 PM
yeah, leave the heavy lifting to the pros
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on June 19, 2007, 02:17:32 PM
gladly
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Dillen on June 19, 2007, 03:00:38 PM
Quote from: EagleFeva on June 19, 2007, 07:35:52 AM
I dunno about "miles"... Knight's pass coverage falls into the zesty category as well.
Because he's slow. He doesn't bite on pump fakes to a guy running an in route 15 yards in front of him either. Even if he did, he wouldn't have the speed to get all the way up 15 yards anyways.

Obviously miles was an exaggeration.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on June 20, 2007, 10:36:57 AM
Looks like EMB is shutting down until next week.  Might get some n00bs here.....just a heads up
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on June 20, 2007, 10:41:04 AM
GF shut down the registration. :yay
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on June 20, 2007, 10:44:46 AM
ha
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: phattymatty on June 20, 2007, 10:52:29 AM
Quote from: BigEd76 on June 20, 2007, 10:36:57 AM
Looks like EMB is shutting down until next week.  Might get some n00bs here.....just a heads up

its going down for a week?  whats going on?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on June 20, 2007, 10:54:40 AM
EpicCycle is going away and they're switching to AmericanEagle, so it'll be a new website with a universal login for MB, article feedback, online store, etc.  Not sure if the current MB is staying or if they're switching to the one used by the Giants, Bears, Bengals and Bills (major mistake if they do)...
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on June 20, 2007, 10:59:32 AM
Like I said over there, Ed, it would have been nice if he had let us know beforehand.  It would be even nicer if Spads granted us access to the new boards before they re-started it so we could get a handle on all the new features.

Whatever, though.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Wingspan on June 20, 2007, 11:05:34 AM
wwaaaaahhhhhhh
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: phattymatty on June 20, 2007, 11:07:42 AM
am i going to lose my member number??? no!!!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on June 20, 2007, 11:13:47 AM
Wow, it's been a long time since I went over there. Is PTATE still a big circle jerk of 'everything is wonderful'-ness? Assclowns.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on June 20, 2007, 11:20:35 AM
Quote from: rjs246 on June 20, 2007, 11:13:47 AM
Wow, it's been a long time since I went over there. Is PTATE still a big circle jerk of 'everything is wonderful'-ness? Assclowns.

Not since you left, you fluffing fluffer.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on June 20, 2007, 11:23:04 AM
Well I can't help it! This team is just so full of talent and world class coaching that I don't understand how anyone can have anything negative to say about it!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: phattymatty on June 20, 2007, 11:42:29 AM
if i lose my double digit member number my street cred goes down the drain.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on June 20, 2007, 11:45:12 AM
I wonder what will happen to DoctorOctagon and Karl Hungus.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on June 20, 2007, 11:49:54 AM
Quote from: rjs246 on June 20, 2007, 11:23:04 AM
Well I can't help it! This team is just so full of talent and world class coaching that I don't understand how anyone can have anything negative to say about it!

The fluffers ripping anyone who suggested drafting Kolb was a stupid move was the coup de grace for me in that forum.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Dillen on June 20, 2007, 12:55:32 PM
Quote from: phattymatty on June 20, 2007, 11:42:29 AM
if i lose my double digit member number my street cred goes down the drain.
If I were you I'd be waiting on the computer at 12:01 Monday morning to get that back. Maybe you could even get top 10. That would be so worth it.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on June 20, 2007, 02:18:50 PM
Quote from: rjs246 on June 20, 2007, 11:45:12 AM
I wonder what will happen to DoctorOctagon and Karl Hungus.

They'll have to re-register.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Sgt PSN on June 20, 2007, 02:21:07 PM
You should all do drain-o shots.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on June 20, 2007, 02:21:39 PM
Dran-O is delicious.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: McNabb_4_mvp on June 20, 2007, 02:43:28 PM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on June 20, 2007, 10:41:04 AM
GF shut down the registration. :yay

n00bz is here.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: McNabb_4_mvp on June 20, 2007, 02:45:12 PM
Quote from: BigEd76 on June 20, 2007, 10:54:40 AM
EpicCycle is going away and they're switching to AmericanEagle, so it'll be a new website with a universal login for MB, article feedback, online store, etc.  Not sure if the current MB is staying or if they're switching to the one used by the Giants, Bears, Bengals and Bills (major mistake if they do)...

So does this mean everybody will be losing their post counts?! ahhhhhhhh noooooooooooooooooo....


Feel bad for those people with 20,000+posts  ;) ahem....
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Cerevant on June 20, 2007, 02:52:52 PM
I hate the off-season.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on June 20, 2007, 03:17:22 PM
Quote from: Cerevant on June 20, 2007, 02:52:52 PM
I hate the off-season.

I'm sure the off-season feels the same about you especially since you farged her and then stole money out of her purse for cab fare.

farging manwhore.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on June 20, 2007, 03:21:35 PM
Can we please stay on topic you sniveling assgarglers.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: McNabb_4_mvp on June 20, 2007, 03:23:08 PM
Quote from: rjs246 on June 20, 2007, 03:21:35 PM
Can we please stay on topic you sniveling assgarglers.

Haven't heard that one before... :yay
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on June 20, 2007, 03:34:39 PM
Quote from: rjs246 on June 20, 2007, 03:21:35 PM
Can we please stay on topic you sniveling assgarglers.

WAR-RI-ORS... COME OUT TO PLAY-YAY! 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on June 20, 2007, 03:36:57 PM
Can you dig it?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on June 20, 2007, 03:39:58 PM
Cyrus was my childhood hero.  Well, him and O.J. Simpson.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on June 20, 2007, 03:44:29 PM
i hope you guys die...quickly
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: StevieLeftCollege on June 20, 2007, 04:57:30 PM
I just copped the Warriors DVD last year, I think they re-made it or issued it on DVD.

Awesome movie. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhanInDC on June 20, 2007, 05:09:25 PM
I never even so much as looked at the EMB before becoming a member here, but I have since, and holy shtein, what bunch of front office corksuckers over there. I like that the fact that this board is full of TATE hating degenerates, however. Hopefully it stays that way.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: StevieLeftCollege on June 20, 2007, 05:21:00 PM
Post count is life.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhanInDC on June 20, 2007, 06:09:58 PM
PFT.com

Quote
EAGLES UNDER INVESTIGATION FOR OFFSEASON CONTACT VIOLATIONS

An industry source tells us that the Philadelphia Eagles are under investigation for alleged repeat violations of the rules against contact during offseason practices.

The source says that tapes of practices have been turned over to the union over the pleadings of coach Andy Reid, who believes that there was no reason to explore the situation.

The source also believes that the inquiry is the result of a complaint made by a player, and not the product of the NFLPA deciding to take matters into its own hands.

So the next question is who would complain?  Typically, players go with the program unless their noise is out of joint for some reason.  And when it comes to Eagles players who might currently have their noses out of joint, there's only one name that comes to mind.

The penalty could include the loss of a draft pick.

I'm guessing they are alluding to McNabb, which makes no sense. Not likely he'd be getting "contacted".
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: StevieLeftCollege on June 20, 2007, 06:15:03 PM
Highly doubt it was McNabb, QBs always wear red and never get touched unless it is gameday.

Maybe it was Trotter.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on June 20, 2007, 06:26:00 PM
Bunkley's lazy excuse to not have to hit someone.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on June 20, 2007, 06:33:33 PM
Maybe it was Westbrook because he's pissed Joseph A. Beancounter is making him give that 3M back.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Dillen on June 20, 2007, 07:39:00 PM
I bet it was Runyan. He hates contact.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on June 20, 2007, 07:40:39 PM
There's no way McNabb would do that.  At least PFT doesn't make any bones about the fact they're 100% speculating.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on June 20, 2007, 09:20:01 PM
From K.C. Joyner's ESPN article on underrated and overrated players.  Look who's listed as the second-most underrated WR in the NFL:

QuoteReggie Brown

Donte Stallworth (who left via free agency) and Kevin Curtis (who signed with the Eagles) have received most of the attention in Philadelphia this offseason, but if the 2006 metrics are any indication, the breakout receiver could be Brown. He ranked 12th in the league with a 9.6 YPA last year, putting him in the company of Reggie Wayne and Darrell Jackson.

He also ranked in the top 22 in bomb and deep pass YPA and had the sixth-highest medium pass YPA. Opposing defenses might be paying a lot of attention to Curtis this season, and Brown's metrics indicate he could make them pay for it.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on June 20, 2007, 09:21:17 PM
That's right....my boy. :yay
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on June 20, 2007, 09:22:46 PM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on June 20, 2007, 09:21:17 PM
That's right....my boy. :yay

They're all your boys, Homer McHomerson.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Flyin High on June 20, 2007, 09:41:25 PM
this team has the potential to be very damn good.  the eagles seem to have a well balance team and if health is on their side...the superbowl is only a destination.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on June 20, 2007, 09:43:01 PM
Oh christ. Here we go.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on June 20, 2007, 09:45:13 PM
Hello rjs246.  I don't understand how you could possibly think this team won't win the Super Bowl this year.  They obviously have no major weaknesses, and the offensive line eats a lot of bacon.  Please don't be so negative.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MDS on June 20, 2007, 09:52:07 PM
Best team evaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaar!!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: StevieLeftCollege on June 20, 2007, 09:54:55 PM
Ever.  At any given time and in any given place.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Flyin High on June 20, 2007, 09:57:34 PM
Quote from: MDS on June 20, 2007, 09:52:07 PM
Best team evaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaar!!

possibly
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on June 20, 2007, 10:05:57 PM
Scott Young deserves to be in the NFL!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on June 20, 2007, 10:06:21 PM
Quote from: Flyin High on June 20, 2007, 09:57:34 PM
Quote from: MDS on June 20, 2007, 09:52:07 PM
Best team evaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaar!!

possibly

Dead.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on June 20, 2007, 10:11:11 PM
Bacon's the best food in the universe.

Close thread.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on June 20, 2007, 10:12:24 PM
Quote from: Jerome99RIP on June 20, 2007, 10:11:11 PM
Close thread.

But... the offseason's not over yet!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on June 20, 2007, 10:16:07 PM
Who cares?  We all find agreement in bacon so what's the use of keeping this ridiculous thread going?

BACON!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on June 20, 2007, 10:18:54 PM
Shawn Andrews eats 7 pounds of bacon a day, I heard.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on June 20, 2007, 10:25:03 PM
farg him.  Bitch eats turkey bacon now.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on June 20, 2007, 10:31:09 PM
I hear Scott Young is white and mormon and plays defensive tackle! Mark my words, this is Correll Buckhalter's year. The Westbrook, Buckhalter, Moats three headed monster will be unstoppable!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on June 20, 2007, 10:36:06 PM
Quote from: rjs246 on June 20, 2007, 10:31:09 PM
The Westbrook, Buckhalter, Moats three headed monster will be unstoppable!

Wrong.  Both Tony Hunt and Nate Ilaoa will both be major contributors too.  FIVE HEADED MONSTER
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on June 20, 2007, 10:57:01 PM
How can you gameplan for the five headed monster? Split Mahe out wide and this backfield is easily the best group in the history of all groups of any kind ever.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on June 20, 2007, 11:07:42 PM
This harkens back to the days of yore in 2005 and 2006 when the skins were about to drop the two-QB and two-RB formation with the unstoppable quartet of Brunell/Campbell/Duckett/Portis.

HOW DO YOU GAMEPLAN FOR IT?!?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: paco on June 20, 2007, 11:18:41 PM
Quote from: FastFreddie on June 20, 2007, 11:07:42 PM
This harkens back to the days of yore in 2005 and 2006 when the skins were about to drop the two-QB and two-RB formation with the unstoppable quartet of Brunell/Campbell/Duckett/Portis.

HOW DO YOU GAMEPLAN FOR IT?!?

Dont forget the triple headed WR monster of Moss, Randel El and Lloyd.

Gameplan for it?  UMPOSSIBLE!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on June 21, 2007, 12:18:18 AM
That receiving corps will be even more one three three seven if they add the spring chicken Keenan McCardell to the mix.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Munson on June 21, 2007, 04:52:16 AM
If the Eagles or the taterskins win the Super Bowl this year I will shave my head.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Geowhizzer on June 21, 2007, 05:26:40 AM
Quote from: rjs246 on June 20, 2007, 10:31:09 PM
I hear Scott Young is white and mormon and plays defensive tackle! Mark my words, this is Correll Buckhalter's year. The Westbrook, Buckhalter, Moats three headed monster will be unstoppable!

Heck, Moats can't even spell "stop."
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on June 21, 2007, 06:28:54 AM
you people need to stop
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on June 21, 2007, 06:29:29 AM
Quote from: Munson on June 21, 2007, 04:52:16 AM
If the Eagles or the taterskins win the Super Bowl this year I will slit my throat.


IN
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on June 21, 2007, 07:45:39 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on June 21, 2007, 06:29:29 AM
Quote from: Munson on June 21, 2007, 04:52:16 AM
If the Eagles or the taterskins win the Super Bowl this year I will slit my throat.


IN

Just when I thought it was impossible for me to root any harder for the Eagles.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on June 21, 2007, 09:42:40 AM
Quote from: EagleFeva on June 21, 2007, 07:45:39 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on June 21, 2007, 06:29:29 AM
Quote from: Munson on June 21, 2007, 04:52:16 AM
If the Eagles or the taterskins win the Super Bowl this year I will slit my throat.


IN

Just when I thought it was impossible for me to root any harder for the Eagles.

Just when I thought it was impossible for IGY to root any harder for the skins.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Dillen on June 21, 2007, 10:52:47 AM
Quote from: King Cole on June 21, 2007, 12:18:18 AM
That receiving corps will be even more one three three seven if they add the spring chicken Keenan McCardell to the mix.
What the farg did you just say?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Geowhizzer on June 21, 2007, 11:34:03 AM
Quote from: Diomedes on June 21, 2007, 06:28:54 AM
you people need to stop

In the name of love?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: General_Failure on June 21, 2007, 11:43:27 AM
Collaborate and listen, or my mom will shoot hammertime.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: StevieLeftCollege on June 21, 2007, 02:06:08 PM
Need more Bacon.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on June 21, 2007, 02:32:59 PM
Chris Walken disagrees (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p8L5CsbugSQ)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Munson on June 21, 2007, 03:08:02 PM
Quote from: FastFreddie on June 21, 2007, 09:42:40 AM
Quote from: EagleFeva on June 21, 2007, 07:45:39 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on June 21, 2007, 06:29:29 AM
Quote from: Munson on June 21, 2007, 04:52:16 AM
If the Eagles or the taterskins win the Super Bowl this year I will slit my throat.


IN

Just when I thought it was impossible for me to root any harder for the Eagles.

Just when I thought it was impossible for IGY to root any harder for the skins.

If the Skins won, I might actually go with the throat slitting.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on June 21, 2007, 03:15:21 PM
I'd have mixed emotions to both extremes on that day.

Although, when I read the Spadaro story about the "tragedy" of a "bright young die-hard Eagles fan" growing too depressed over a skins Super Bowl victory, the elated part of me would turn to septic vomit.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Munson on June 21, 2007, 11:07:17 PM
I think any Eagles fan who knows of ES would turn to throat slitting after reading the garbage that would come from that site after a taterskins SB victory.

I typed this naked.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on June 21, 2007, 11:08:41 PM
Eckel said they reviewed the tapes and the Eagles were guilty of nothing in the OTAs.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Munson on June 22, 2007, 01:36:19 AM
Mark  Shceletlerelteth ranked the Eagles #1 in the division in both offense and defense in that ESPN Ultimate Depth chart thing....can't really say I disagree. Though a lot of it depends on 1. How good/bad Tony Romo does vs. McNabb staying healthy and 2. How much better, if at all, the run defense of the Eagles is this year with the addition of Spikes and the subtraction of Dhani, and of course if Kearse can stay healthy/the DT's(Bunkley) contribute.

1-2 Could really go either way with the Eagles and COwboys. At least it kind of spices up the rivalry again.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on June 22, 2007, 10:06:43 AM
great news

ike reese is on wip right now and said he has officially retired and is moving back to philly to get into radio and tv

says the day he left philly he knew he wanted to come back and live here...he and his family consider it home and love it

the gawd ike reese
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on June 22, 2007, 10:07:24 AM
Hire him to coach the special teams right now.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on June 22, 2007, 10:08:30 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on June 22, 2007, 10:06:43 AM
great news

ike reese is on wip right now and said he has officially retired and is moving back to philly to get into radio and tv

says the day he left philly he knew he wanted to come back and live here...he and his family consider it home and love it

the gawd ike reese

he was on DNL last night and said he couldn't believe how lax things were in Atlanta when he went there.  6 months in he wanted to come back.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on June 22, 2007, 10:10:55 AM
Quote from: SunMo on June 22, 2007, 10:08:30 AM
he was on DNL last night and said he couldn't believe how lax things were in Atlanta when he went there.

Are you saying they didn't have full contact in non-contact minicamps?  Hoydas.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on June 22, 2007, 10:19:48 AM
Ike was regularly on the radio here and Atlanta has a real hate thing for the Eagles and would try to get him to talk shtein about the Eagles and/or fans.  He'd not only refuse to do it... he'd defend them and usually told them to back off of it.

Much love for Ike Reese.  :yay
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on June 22, 2007, 10:29:23 AM
^^^^^^
thats awesome


i think im gonna get a blue and yellow throwback ike reese jersey
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Magical_Retard on June 22, 2007, 10:32:04 AM
Quote from: SunMo on June 22, 2007, 10:08:30 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on June 22, 2007, 10:06:43 AM
great news

ike reese is on wip right now and said he has officially retired and is moving back to philly to get into radio and tv

says the day he left philly he knew he wanted to come back and live here...he and his family consider it home and love it

the gawd ike reese

he was on DNL last night and said he couldn't believe how lax things were in Atlanta when he went there.  6 months in he wanted to come back.

they were prolly too busy placing bets with vick
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on June 22, 2007, 10:35:10 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on June 22, 2007, 10:29:23 AM
blue and yellow throwback ike reese jersey

That's the best idea you've had, ever.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on June 22, 2007, 10:53:38 AM
Ike's in my top 5 all-time favorite Eagles...

Fire Rory...Hire Ike
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on June 22, 2007, 11:07:13 AM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on June 22, 2007, 10:53:38 AM
Ike's in my top 5 all-time favorite Eagles...

Name the other 4.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on June 22, 2007, 11:08:55 AM
In no particular order

Ike Reese
Eric Allen
Duce Staley
Jeremiah Trotter
Brian Dawkins
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on June 22, 2007, 11:11:51 AM
youngin
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on June 22, 2007, 11:14:43 AM
Pretty much, but I remember Buddy's teams from 1988 on. Thats when I really got into the NFL.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on June 22, 2007, 11:40:27 AM
i think my top ten would all be off buddy teams
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MDS on June 22, 2007, 01:10:18 PM
Zordich
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on June 22, 2007, 01:40:25 PM
zordich harmon hauck hager and bloom
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Munson on June 22, 2007, 01:56:48 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on June 22, 2007, 01:40:25 PM
zordich harmon hauck hager and bloom

I think I see a pattern.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on June 22, 2007, 02:53:41 PM
Yeah, they all have an "h" in their names.












































Don't forget Bloom's middle name... "hawt".
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on June 22, 2007, 03:09:26 PM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on June 22, 2007, 10:53:38 AM
Ike's in my top 5 all-time favorite Eagles...

Fire Rory...Hire Ike

Same here. Love Ike.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on June 22, 2007, 04:40:53 PM
Top 5:

Jerome Brown
Brian Dawkins
Keith Byars
Harold Carmichael
Wes Hopkins
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on June 22, 2007, 05:09:06 PM
Waters
Byars
Cummingham
Duce
McNabb

Also, I farging love Chuck Bednarik for his salty attitude as a player and crotchety old bitchiness as a retiree.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Geowhizzer on June 22, 2007, 05:13:54 PM
Byars
Dawkins
White
Cunningham
Waters
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on June 22, 2007, 06:31:30 PM
Cunningham
Dawkins
McNabb
Allen
Vincent


Honorable mention to Anthony Toney...  ;D
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on June 22, 2007, 06:35:58 PM
ugh..we're in top five list hell!  this is bad.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on June 22, 2007, 10:43:31 PM
Boniol
McDougle
Mamula
Ike Reese
Harris
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on June 22, 2007, 10:51:48 PM
Thomas Hamner
Mike Mamula
Raheem Brock
Ron Jaworski
Rich Kotite
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on June 22, 2007, 10:52:47 PM
in order

1. wes hopkins
2. wilbert
3. eric allen
4. randall
5. arkansas fred

shawn andrews is on the charts with a bullett tho...with more time he might just crack the top 5
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Munson on June 22, 2007, 11:28:26 PM
Dawkins
Cunningham
Duce
Vincent
Douglas


I'd probably pick more players from the earlier 90's but the only one I can remember with much clarity is Cunningham.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on June 22, 2007, 11:48:59 PM
i generally dont pay attention to cheesy lists like this but this one really made me angry...


http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=nfcfocusrankingtheguards&prov=tsn&type=lgns
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on June 22, 2007, 11:59:43 PM
in that case I'll skip it
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on June 23, 2007, 12:03:25 AM
theres lots of awful things about it but to sum it up it says the giants interior line is better than the eagles
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on June 23, 2007, 07:35:48 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on June 22, 2007, 11:48:59 PM
i generally dont pay attention to cheesy lists like this but this one really made me angry...


http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=nfcfocusrankingtheguards&prov=tsn&type=lgns

Ranking the Giants' trio at #3 is hilarious.


BTW, IGY.... no Barksdale on your top five?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on June 23, 2007, 09:33:18 AM
BTW, IGY.... no Barksdale on your top five?

he in andrews class...one day hell be on the list but its a little too early
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on June 23, 2007, 10:29:57 AM
Those lists are all stupid. Peter King has Jon Kitna ranked ahead of McNabb.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: -Triumph- on June 23, 2007, 12:55:32 PM
Quote from: FastFreddie on June 20, 2007, 09:45:13 PM
Hello rjs246.  I don't understand how you could possibly think this team won't win the Super Bowl this year.  They obviously have no major weaknesses, and the offensive line eats a lot of bacon.  Please don't be so negative.

"It's BACON! Bacon, bacon, BACON!"
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on June 23, 2007, 11:27:02 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on June 23, 2007, 12:03:25 AM
theres lots of awful things about it but to sum it up it says the giants interior line is better than the eagles

1st thing I noticed.  Ridiculous.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Munson on June 24, 2007, 03:36:17 AM
The giants inteirrior line is a giant sack of shtein wrappted in testivle bumps. Terrible.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on June 24, 2007, 12:32:58 PM
drunk posting!  YES!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: hbionic on June 24, 2007, 01:21:09 PM
The truth behind Munson's crazy drunkeness. (http://www.grapheine.com/bombaytv/index.php?module=see&lang=uk&code=9bbd34ac18d542d3e09c5d51a978efdd)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on June 24, 2007, 02:01:26 PM
ha...that was so bad it was good
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on June 24, 2007, 02:07:03 PM
It looks like his head's shaved, so I guess Munson lost his bet with himself.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Munson on June 24, 2007, 08:42:36 PM
I'd have no problem giving up my hair for an Eagles Super Bowl. It just won't happen this year.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on June 24, 2007, 11:17:48 PM
Dawkins interview on NBC10 Sports Final

It was more of the TKO lovefest, but when asked if this is the best defense he's been a part of in 12 seasons, he wouldn't go there....didn't want to be labeled as paper champions

Says this team can get to the Super Bowl again

Family is doing well and he can't wait to get to training camp
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: lonfident on June 25, 2007, 12:26:57 AM
Quote from: Munson on June 24, 2007, 08:42:36 PM
I'd have no problem giving up my hair for an Eagles Super Bowl. It just won't happen this year.

I have no problem giving up Munson's hair, either.

BTW, I hope all the lists were fishing. For example- Charles Young, Wilbert Montgomery, Keith Jackson, Steve Van Buren, Chuck Bednarik, Reggie White.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on June 25, 2007, 10:28:36 AM
(http://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/uploads/photos/perm/main/BPLFEFMPBMCL/hp-chesney-062407.jpg)

Andy looks awful.  He's a stroke waiting to happen at this point.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Butchers Bill on June 25, 2007, 10:33:02 AM
Quote from: Jerome99RIP on June 25, 2007, 10:28:36 AM
(http://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/uploads/photos/perm/main/BPLFEFMPBMCL/hp-chesney-062407.jpg)

Andy looks awful.  He's a stroke waiting to happen at this point.

Stick to wearing black Andy...for the love of god.   :puke
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on June 25, 2007, 10:40:06 AM
New PE.com today at 2pm
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on June 25, 2007, 10:43:25 AM
(http://www.weeklyreader.com/readandwriting/content/binary/happy%20and%20excited.jpeg)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Wingspan on June 25, 2007, 10:53:08 AM
(http://www.tbfh.com/images/iJustPeed.gif)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on June 25, 2007, 10:56:23 AM
QuoteWe are committed to making your experience as enjoyable as possible. For those 139,001 users registered to our Discussion Boards, we plan to restore full use of the boards -- with your user name and post counts intact -- no later than Wednesday afternoon. We are in the around-the-clock process of converting all of your data to our new servers and boards.

But what about the member number?!?!?!?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on June 25, 2007, 11:01:02 AM
the fact that they even had to reassure anybody that their post count would remain is an embarassment
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: hunt on June 25, 2007, 11:17:51 AM
Quote from: SunMo on June 25, 2007, 11:01:02 AM
the fact that they even had to reassure anybody that their post count would remain is an embarassment

agreed...the peeps on here are way cooler.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on June 25, 2007, 11:25:33 AM
most of us anyway
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on June 25, 2007, 11:32:39 AM
congrats on #5000 hunt  :P
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on June 25, 2007, 11:32:56 AM
Post count is life.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: hunt on June 25, 2007, 11:43:08 AM
ed made a funnee :-D
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on June 25, 2007, 11:48:24 AM
I hate all of you.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on June 25, 2007, 11:53:34 AM
Enough to kill yourself over?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on June 25, 2007, 11:57:30 AM
http://museum.philadelphiaeagles.com/widereceiverpoll.asp (http://museum.philadelphiaeagles.com/widereceiverpoll.asp)

Hahahaha!  Look who made the list.

Hilarious.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: hunt on June 25, 2007, 12:02:17 PM
quick & carmichael.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on June 25, 2007, 12:03:32 PM
Quote from: Jerome99RIP on June 25, 2007, 11:53:34 AM
Enough to kill yourself over?

No no no. You're missing the point. I hate all of YOU. I don't hate myself. I rule, you see. Clearly, you were confused.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Wingspan on June 25, 2007, 12:03:41 PM
Carmichael and McDonald. Quick is a very close 3rd.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on June 25, 2007, 12:04:13 PM
Quote from: hunt on June 25, 2007, 12:02:17 PM
quick & carmichael.

Um no. Carmichael and McDonald.

Quick was a nice player and all, but come on dude.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on June 25, 2007, 12:06:56 PM
barnett and quick...thank you
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on June 25, 2007, 12:09:33 PM
Pinkston and Baskett!!1!11!!1!!@!!#@$@#$@#$@#@4jq
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on June 25, 2007, 12:13:28 PM
No Cheggie Brownson??!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!!??!!?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on June 25, 2007, 12:18:05 PM
Carmichael is a no-brainer.  McDonald should be too.  But he's white and old, so people will vote for Quick.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: hunt on June 25, 2007, 12:18:46 PM
that's exactly why i voted for quick.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on June 25, 2007, 12:18:56 PM
mike quick was much better than harold and lolol @ tommy mcdonald

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on June 25, 2007, 12:20:01 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on June 25, 2007, 12:18:56 PM
mike quick was much better than harold and lolol @ tommy mcdonald



Yeah. He's in the Hall of Fame and was a dominant player. But clearly he shouldn't get the vote here. Clown.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on June 25, 2007, 12:21:29 PM
he wouldnt even make the eagles today
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on June 25, 2007, 12:43:36 PM
What does your opinion of his talent compared to Hank Baskett and Greg Lewis have to do with anything? He's a farging hall of famer. You're ridiculous.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on June 25, 2007, 12:56:34 PM
IGY & I went round and round on Tommy McDonald before.  There's no changing his mind on this point.  Trust me, I tried.

I went with Carmichael & McDonald incidentally but Mike Quick was a close third.  If Quick hadn't gotten hurt, he might have been the all-time greatest Eagles receiver.  He was electrifying on the field.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhanInDC on June 25, 2007, 12:56:56 PM
Quote from: BigEd76 on June 25, 2007, 10:40:06 AM
New PE.com today at 2pm

Over/Under


5 minutes after 2:00 the new PE.com message boards crash?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on June 25, 2007, 12:57:44 PM
I'd say way over since the new boards won't be up until Wednesday.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on June 25, 2007, 12:59:41 PM
oh i thought we were talking about whether hes the best eagle wr ever...he obviously belongs in the hall of fame...guys from every era do...but the fact remains he was smaller than jeremy bloom and not particularly fast...he would get eaten alive by todays cb's...so what you can do is thank him for his contributions to a by gone era...but please dont ever put him up with the best eagle wr's ever
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhanInDC on June 25, 2007, 01:03:10 PM
Quote from: Jerome99RIP on June 25, 2007, 12:57:44 PM
I'd say way over since the new boards won't be up until Wednesday.


You might be right.


Might.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Wingspan on June 25, 2007, 01:04:59 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on June 25, 2007, 12:59:41 PM
oh i thought we were talking about whether hes the best eagle wr ever...he obviously belongs in the hall of fame...guys from every era do...but the fact remains he was smaller than jeremy bloom and not particularly fast...he would get eaten alive by todays cb's...so what you can do is thank him for his contributions to a by gone era...but please dont ever put him up with the best eagle wr's ever

lololololololol @ you

that could be the dumbest, most misinformed string of words that you have ever pecked at your keyboard to form.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on June 25, 2007, 01:05:58 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on June 25, 2007, 12:59:41 PM
oh i thought we were talking about whether hes the best eagle wr ever...he obviously belongs in the hall of fame...guys from every era do...but the fact remains he was smaller than jeremy bloom and not particularly fast...he would get eaten alive by todays cb's...so what you can do is thank him for his contributions to a by gone era...but please dont ever put him up with the best eagle wr's ever

Wow.  2nd to Wingspan's general sentiment, although I think you've waxed moronic on much more important issues before.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on June 25, 2007, 01:06:49 PM
That's a lot of lol's, Winger.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Geowhizzer on June 25, 2007, 01:10:08 PM
1.  Carmichael
2.  McDonald
3.  Quick


Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on June 25, 2007, 01:13:28 PM
haha, i love it.  IGY gets all you morons so mad, it's hilarious.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on June 25, 2007, 01:15:28 PM
lololololololol @ you

that could be the dumbest, most misinformed string of words that you have ever pecked at your keyboard to form.


wrong again dunn dunn

he may have been fast for his day but he would get merked in todays nfl...hed prpbably be an excellent cfl'er tho

look i know you guys feed into the glory days and the sentimental r diddy stories on people like mcdonald but trust me even tommy himself would say he would have no place in todays game
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on June 25, 2007, 01:33:12 PM
That's the case with most players from 50 years ago, but you're missing the point of selecting a team like that.

Hell, for all we know, Bednarik would be no better than Jason Short in today's NFL, but would you still consider him one of the best 3 linebackers to play for the Eagles?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Wingspan on June 25, 2007, 01:33:59 PM
A 9.xx second 100 yard dash is fast no matter what the year.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on June 25, 2007, 01:35:27 PM
T.O. is better than Carmichael and Quick easily.  Should he be on the team, then?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Cerevant on June 25, 2007, 01:38:16 PM
You are all missing the point...
McDonald: white
Bednarik: white

VIGY's Case closed - they never should have played in the NFL.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on June 25, 2007, 01:38:26 PM
I guess they flipped the wrong switch at 2:00.  It's the same old PE.Com right now.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on June 25, 2007, 01:39:35 PM
you can't improve on perfection Romey
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on June 25, 2007, 01:42:56 PM
I know.  I look in the mirror every day and see living proof of that.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on June 25, 2007, 01:43:39 PM
that's not a mirror, it's a poster of a whale vagina
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on June 25, 2007, 01:44:37 PM
T.O. is better than Carmichael and Quick easily.  Should he be on the team, then?

no because he didnt play long enough to be on an eagle all time team

but he is the single best wr to ever play for the eagles
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on June 25, 2007, 01:51:38 PM
Quote from: SunMo on June 25, 2007, 01:43:39 PM
that's not a mirror, it's a poster of a whale vagina

:-D
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on June 25, 2007, 01:54:00 PM
PE.com is still not switched over yet.

More zesty clock management from the Eagles.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Father Demon on June 25, 2007, 01:54:26 PM
Quote from: Jerome99RIP on June 25, 2007, 01:54:00 PM
PE.com is still not switched over yet.

More zesty clock management from the Eagles.
HEY-OOOOHHHHH!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on June 25, 2007, 01:56:15 PM
I just noticed that the CF site clock is off by almost a half hour.  WTF? 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Dillen on June 25, 2007, 02:14:00 PM
Mine was off by like an hour and 25 minutes. In the profile settings they have "clock offset," and I guess around an average number and got the time almost right on the nose.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhanInDC on June 25, 2007, 02:20:29 PM
Quote from: Jerome99RIP on June 25, 2007, 01:56:15 PM
I just noticed that the CF site clock is off by almost a half hour.  WTF? 

I set mine to 1.41. It's dead on now for EST. I started at 1, then 1.5.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: phattymatty on June 25, 2007, 03:55:41 PM
QuotePositional Analysis by Pro Football Hall of Fame member Ray Didinger

"I can't think of too many other groups of wide receivers that are better than the one the Eagles have. The Rams have a history of great, great receivers, but if you had to pick the one area that the Eagles have had the highest level of talent and production in the 75 years of the franchise, you would have to say it is wide receiver. This is a really good group. Tommy McDonald is a Hall of Fame player and there are other players on the list who had that kind of career ...

what a crock of shtein.  WR is definitely the first thing that comes to mind when you think of the Eagles.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on June 25, 2007, 04:19:16 PM
Dustin Fox is going to get in the mix and compete (http://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/homeNewsDetail.jsp?id=71386)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Dillen on June 25, 2007, 07:04:52 PM
The new website seems pretty good. I don't really see the point in changing it all, but it's more picture-oriented for those visual learners.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on June 25, 2007, 07:09:23 PM
I like the darker greens and over all color tone better. To the surprise of no one there are more advertisments.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on June 25, 2007, 07:24:58 PM
More ads, same ridiculous content.  Everybody wins. (http://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/news/Story.asp?story_id=13123&spadaro=1)

:-D
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: QB Eagles on June 25, 2007, 07:50:41 PM
Quote from: phattymatty on June 25, 2007, 03:55:41 PM
QuotePositional Analysis by Pro Football Hall of Fame member Ray Didinger

"I can't think of too many other groups of wide receivers that are better than the one the Eagles have....

what a crock of shtein.  WR is definitely the first thing that comes to mind when you think of the Eagles.

Yeah that was my first reaction too. Ray Diddy is really smoking crack with that one. I guess PE.com wouldn't have liked it if he had written that Eagles receivers historically play chess (nice filter there), but he didn't have to go that far into the realm of fantasy to appease Eagles public relations.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on June 25, 2007, 07:57:17 PM
thats cause diddys idol is mcdonald...and once mcdonald asked his number one cheerleader to induct him in the hall of fame it was all over after that...diddy thinks mcdonald is best wr in nfl history much less eagles history...thus because of that hes also going to vastly overrate their wr's as a whole

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on June 25, 2007, 10:15:38 PM
Some cold hard football facts for that ass (http://coldhardfootballfacts.com/Article.php?Page=1463)

QuoteTommy McDonald. The diminutive wideout (5-9, 176 pounds) played in the NFL from 1958 to 1968, mostly for Philadelphia. He's second only to Hutson in career TD receptions among receivers who spent their entire career in the pre-Live Ball Era NFL. To put his career into perspective, he caught in 152 games as many TD passes as Andre Rison (84) did in 12 years and 184 games in the modern NFL (1989-2000).

McDonald's 84 TDs came on just 495 career receptions and he averaged 17.0 yards per catch.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Munson on June 26, 2007, 12:12:18 AM
He dominated against weaker, mostly white competition. [/igy]
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on June 26, 2007, 06:31:31 AM
i wouldnt say whiter i would say slower and most importantly a lot smaller...again mcdonald was smaller than jeremy bloom

put it this way if andre rison played against tommy mcdonald competition any team he was ever on would never have run the ball

there werent no darrell greens or deion sanders when tommy was playing...which was a very good thing for him...the fact of the matter is the depth of talent in all sports is now so much better than it was 50 years ago its ludicrous to compare the eras...tommy deserves all the credit in the world and deservingly is in the HOF...but hes not even close to being the best eagle wr ever and its laughable to put him in the conversation
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ThirdStreetMafia on June 26, 2007, 08:32:59 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on June 26, 2007, 06:31:31 AM
i wouldnt say whiter i would say slower and most importantly a lot smaller...again mcdonald was smaller than jeremy bloom

put it this way if andre rison played against tommy mcdonald competition any team he was ever on would never have run the ball

there werent no darrell greens or deion sanders when tommy was playing...which was a very good thing for him...the fact of the matter is the depth of talent in all sports is now so much better than it was 50 years ago its ludicrous to compare the eras...tommy deserves all the credit in the world and deservingly is in the HOF...but hes not even close to being the best eagle wr ever and its laughable to put him in the conversation


Yeah but how can you fault mcdonald for that? The league was what it was then... I agree with you about him not being one of the two best though. I never really think its quite fair to older players when they get compared to players of today. You have to simply look at what they did to the competitiont they faced... to put them up against anything else really sint fair
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on June 26, 2007, 08:34:55 AM
i hate it too...thats my whole point...people trying to say that tommy mcdonald was as good as mike quick or harold carmichael is comedy

and i said several times i dont fault him for when he played...and that he deserves the hall of fame
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on June 26, 2007, 09:40:55 AM
Vince Lombardi might be an awful coach in today's game.  Hell, look at Joe Gibbs so far in the 21st century.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on June 26, 2007, 09:52:34 AM
that might be true...but he also might have adapted to todays nfl...he seemed like a smart guy...i dont think the coaches were dumber in the 60's than they are now...the playing field would have been just as level imo

but tommy mcdonald would be going against far superior competition now than when he played...and hed still be 5'8/5'9 and slower than most corners...tommy mcdonald in todays nfl is probably tim dwight
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Zanshin on June 26, 2007, 10:12:57 AM
Because Tim Dwight was slow?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on June 26, 2007, 10:17:14 AM
Quote from: Zanshin on June 26, 2007, 10:12:57 AM
Because Tim Dwight was slow?

Ha!

QuoteHe also competed in track events; in 1999, he was Big Ten Champion in the 100 meter dash, and he also was part of the 1999 Big Ten Champion 4 x 400 meter relay, the 1999 Big Ten Champion 4 x 100 meter relay, and the 1998 Big Ten Champion 4 x 100 meter relay.

Of course, that was in the "slow" Big Ten.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on June 26, 2007, 10:22:29 AM
who said anything about tim dwight being slow?

yous are reaching dookies

in fact i dont know why you even did it but brigning up tim dwights speed just further proves my point...he was much faster than tommy and still could barely play wr in this league due to being a midget

nicely done but my comparison was that tommy would possibly be a good KR and not much more
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Zanshin on June 26, 2007, 10:29:33 AM
I don't care about your position one way or the other-- but you're contradicting yourself while trying to make your own point.  McDonald and Dwight shouldn't be compared...they're really not all that similar-- if Dwight wasn't white, you wouldn't even have reached for that.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on June 26, 2007, 10:38:54 AM
Why couldn't Tommy McDonald play more like Santana Moss or Steve Smith?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on June 26, 2007, 10:39:39 AM
McDonald ran the 100 in under 10 seconds. But he's slower than most cornerbacks. Der.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Dillen on June 26, 2007, 10:45:21 AM
Quote from: FastFreddie on June 26, 2007, 10:38:54 AM
Why couldn't Tommy McDonald play more like Santana Moss or Steve Smith?
Once again, because he's white.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on June 26, 2007, 10:51:41 AM
I don't care about your position one way or the other-- but you're contradicting yourself while trying to make your own point.  McDonald and Dwight shouldn't be compared...they're really not all that similar-- if Dwight wasn't white, you wouldn't even have reached for that.

they both would be (and were) KR's in this day and age because of their size

its actually a very good comparison

you need to put on your colorblind shades


Why couldn't Tommy McDonald play more like Santana Moss or Steve Smith?

because they are 1000 times more athletic than him
a ton stronger
and faster

tim dwight for example was fast on the track but he didnt have the necessary strength or skills to play wr in this league....tommy would have been even worse than dwight imo

i dont believe for a second that tommy mcdonald was that fast...i think he was very fast for his competition of the day...but he wasnt running away from anyone in todays nfl

the old timers are revising history the same way people today will try to say that someone from 80's was better than a guy today simply because they grew up with them or its the right thing to do by saying a throwback is better than a current guy....and in some cases a definite argument can be made...but when it comes to someone from the 50's like tommy mcdonald its just silly...i call it the chuck bednarik syndrome

hey tho if you think tommy mcdonald is one of the two best eagle wr's ever then by all means cling to it...im obviously not gonna change your brainwashed minds
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on June 26, 2007, 11:00:01 AM
btw the color aspect comes into this when you consider that the last nfl team (racist taterskins) didnt integrate until the 60's...and it wasnt until years after that when tommy mcdonald wasnt even in the league that blacks truly were given an across the board fair shot at making nfl rosters and starting positions

i choose to leave that part out for fear of the white brigade coming into this thread...and instead focus on mcdoanlds ridiclously small size and his lack of speed and skill as it would translate into todays game

either way the guy just wouldnt even be a starting nfl wr today much less the best eagle wr of all-time...thats just a joke
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Zanshin on June 26, 2007, 11:03:49 AM
It's a crap comparison, and you know it.  Your aggregate points would be more valid if you'd at least own up to being a doofus on occasion.  As it is, you come across as a know-it-all who can't bear to be at all wrong.  And that's fine, because you do provide some nice inadvertent comic relief.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Wingspan on June 26, 2007, 11:06:02 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on June 26, 2007, 11:00:01 AM
i choose to leave that part out for fear of the white brigade coming into this thread...and instead focus on mcdoanlds ridiclously small size and his lack of speed and skill as it would translate into todays game

You chose to leave that part out...but keep mentioning his "lack of speed." Now that is comedy.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Zanshin on June 26, 2007, 11:08:43 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on June 26, 2007, 11:00:01 AM
btw the color aspect comes into this when you consider that the last nfl team (racist taterskins) didnt integrate until the 60's...and it wasnt until years after that when tommy mcdonald wasnt even in the league that blacks truly were given an across the board fair shot at making nfl rosters and starting positions

i choose to leave that part out for fear of the white brigade coming into this thread...and instead focus on mcdoanlds ridiclously small size and his lack of speed and skill as it would translate into todays game

either way the guy just wouldnt even be a starting nfl wr today much less the best eagle wr of all-time...thats just a joke

But even that arguement is a joke-- who's to say that McDonald wouldn't have been a tenacious speed demon using today's HGH and training techniques?  It's just not that easy to try to take a guy and mentally plug him into today's game.  it's a comparision that isn't even worthy of making.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Zanshin on June 26, 2007, 11:12:16 AM
Quote from: Wingspan on June 26, 2007, 11:06:02 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on June 26, 2007, 11:00:01 AM
i choose to leave that part out for fear of the white brigade coming into this thread...and instead focus on mcdoanlds ridiclously small size and his lack of speed and skill as it would translate into todays game

You chose to leave that part out...but keep mentioning his "lack of speed." Now that is comedy.

Well, what he meant was that he wanted you to know exactly what he was getting at without being really clear, that way he could word weasel his way out when things didn't go his way.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on June 26, 2007, 11:14:18 AM
It's just not that easy to try to take a guy and mentally plug him into today's game.  it's a comparision that isn't even worthy of making.

thank you

there is no comparison...i dont know why people think he would translate to being a hall of fame wr in todays game...it simply wouldnt happen...some players could make that jump...jim brown for example would be a hof'er in any era...a 5/8 170 wr...not so much

and if he couldnt make that leap then theres no way he can be the eagles best all time wr...its ludicous

thats all im saying
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on June 26, 2007, 11:19:51 AM
You chose to leave that part out...but keep mentioning his "lack of speed." Now that is comedy.

i said numerous times against the inferior competition of the 50's and 60's he had some speed...in todays game not so much...hed be just another scattershot type punt/kick returner

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Wingspan on June 26, 2007, 11:20:42 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on June 26, 2007, 11:19:51 AM
You chose to leave that part out...but keep mentioning his "lack of speed." Now that is comedy.

i said numerous times against the inferior competition of the 50's and 60's he had some speed...in todays game not so much...hed be just another scattershot type punt/kick returner



Wrong
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on June 26, 2007, 11:23:57 AM
Stopwatches are much different now. Time was slower back then, making his sub-10 second 100 yard dash appear to be faster than it really was. Today it would have been more like 13 seconds.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Wingspan on June 26, 2007, 11:24:59 AM
Football was also played downhill then. BOTH WAYS!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on June 26, 2007, 11:39:41 AM
Stopwatches are much different now. Time was slower back then, making his sub-10 second 100 yard dash appear to be faster than it really was. Today it would have been more like 13 seconds.

number one track speed does not equal football speed...anyone knows that

secondly 100 yard dash times means little in football

and lastly its not how fast he was its how fast his opponents were...guys in the league now are way faster not to mention stronger

and thats if he even really ran the 100 that fast....where is the definitive proof...or is it some passed on fable that people like diddy claim as gospel now

he didnt go up against the best players in his era as many of them werent allowed in the league...so how would you ever put him up against the best of all time...keep him out of the modern era and he gets his full props...dont bring him into the modern era with the big boys...its not fair to him



Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Zanshin on June 26, 2007, 11:42:53 AM
lol...you are so full of shtein.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on June 26, 2007, 11:43:43 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on June 26, 2007, 11:39:41 AM
keep him out of the modern era and he gets his full props...dont bring him into the modern era with the big boys...its not fair to him

The whole point of the 75th anniversary team is comparing the players to their own eras for that exact reason.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on June 26, 2007, 11:48:06 AM
Quote from: rjs246 on June 26, 2007, 11:23:57 AM
Stopwatches are much different now. Time was slower back then, making his sub-10 second 100 yard dash appear to be faster than it really was. Today it would have been more like 13 seconds.

Classic.   :-D
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on June 26, 2007, 11:50:15 AM
Quote from: FastFreddie on June 26, 2007, 11:43:43 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on June 26, 2007, 11:39:41 AM
keep him out of the modern era and he gets his full props...dont bring him into the modern era with the big boys...its not fair to him

The whole point of the 75th anniversary team is comparing the players to their own eras for that exact reason.

Amazing how such a simple voting concept could be so misunderstood

Quote from: Jerome99RIP on June 26, 2007, 11:48:06 AM
Quote from: rjs246 on June 26, 2007, 11:23:57 AM
Stopwatches are much different now. Time was slower back then, making his sub-10 second 100 yard dash appear to be faster than it really was. Today it would have been more like 13 seconds.

Classic.   :-D

ha
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on June 26, 2007, 11:54:16 AM
right i agree...but dont say that tommy mcdonald is as good as mike quick...like zanshin said its a bogus comparison and not close

i think the confusion here is that youre all saying tommy should be on the all time eagle team...and thats different than saying hes the best eagle wr ever

reggie brown is a better wr than tommy mcdonald but he would never belong on an all time eagle team



btw deacon jones ran a sub 10 100 yard dash too...so maybe the stop watches back then were suspect

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Wingspan on June 26, 2007, 11:56:53 AM
You really need to do a little research before you go off about this stuff. While the notoriously racists taterskins were by far the last to integrate. Integration began in the mid 40's. (before baseball if i remember correctly)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on June 26, 2007, 11:59:05 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on June 26, 2007, 11:54:16 AM
right i agree...but dont say that tommy mcdonald is as good as mike quick...

The only way you can compare players from different eras is by comparing them to their respective eras. The end.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on June 26, 2007, 12:06:09 PM
You really need to do a little research before you go off about this stuff. While the notoriously racists taterskins were by far the last to integrate. Integration began in the mid 40's.

yeah and blacks werent fully given a 100% fair shot until the 70's...and much later at the qb position and perhaps some others like oline...bottom line is the league in the 50's and 60's did not contain the best players in the world...imagine how many inferior white players were kept on rosters over blacks because of racism...


The only way you can compare players from different eras is by comparing them to their respective eras. The end.

absolutely 100% wrong...stop listening to the old fogies that wanna believe that the game 50 years ago was better than now...if mike quick was in the nfl during the 50's they would have shut down the league for unfairness
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on June 26, 2007, 12:11:17 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on June 26, 2007, 11:54:16 AM
i think the confusion here is that youre all saying tommy should be on the all time eagle team...and thats different than saying hes the best eagle wr ever

There is no confusion.  That's exactly what the 75th Anniversary team is... an "all time Eagle team".  Derrrrrr.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on June 26, 2007, 12:17:13 PM
no because some people were saying hes a better wr than those other guys...not that he deserved to be on the team more
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on June 26, 2007, 12:17:13 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on June 26, 2007, 12:06:09 PM
The only way you can compare players from different eras is by comparing them to their respective eras. The end.

absolutely 100% wrong...stop listening to the old fogies that wanna believe that the game 50 years ago was better than now...if mike quick was in the nfl during the 50's they would have shut down the league for unfairness

What I'm saying is you can't make a comparison, you can only go by the era that an athlete played in. I'm sure players by todays standards are a lot more athletic then they were then, but you can only judge them in their respective eras. By your logic TO should have gotten the vote over Quick.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on June 26, 2007, 12:30:37 PM
By your logic TO should have gotten the vote over Quick

naw i said TO should not make this team

me and you are in total agreement

i was debating with the people like rjs who was trying to say that mcdonald is the best wr the eagles have ever had
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: bowzer on June 26, 2007, 12:33:49 PM
Quote from: SD_Eagle on June 26, 2007, 12:17:13 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on June 26, 2007, 12:06:09 PM
The only way you can compare players from different eras is by comparing them to their respective eras. The end.

absolutely 100% wrong...stop listening to the old fogies that wanna believe that the game 50 years ago was better than now...if mike quick was in the nfl during the 50's they would have shut down the league for unfairness

What I'm saying is you can't make a comparison, you can only go by the era that an athlete played in. I'm sure players by todays standards are a lot more athletic then they were then, but you can only judge them in their respective eras. By your logic TO should have gotten the vote over Quick.

I think some of this argument resembles the whole Shaq/Wilt argument.  Some will argue that Shaq would destroy Wilt because he has so much weight on him, whereas others argue that Wilt was one of the greatest athletes in the world regardless of era.  Additionally, some argue argue that if Wilt were around today, and had the strength and training programs available to him, he'd still be able to dominate like he did in 60s. 

In regards to this current discussion, couldn't it be argued that since these players are from such different time periods, they shouldn't be compared at all.  Football players weren't as big and athletic as they were back then, but what if the players from the 60s had modern day training facilities at their disposal?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Event Horizon on June 26, 2007, 04:08:14 PM
Unless you include a bunch of "ifs", there is only one way to judge who belongs on the "75th". You have to go by how important that player was to the team he played on at the time. How important was he to the success of that team? That is the only criterion that isn't loaded with a lot of speculation. Trying to envision guys in different eras is purely hypothetical and so no answer would be better than another. Keep them in their own generation and it's pretty simple- who was the better player at a given position according to the standards of their peers. Immediately, names begin to jump out at you. Bednarik, Westbrook and so on.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Dillen on June 27, 2007, 01:27:10 PM
QuoteNew for 2007! 'Magic Snaps with Jon Dorenbos!'
If you think the team's long snapper has fast hands on the field, just wait until you see him perform amazing slight of hand tricks in this wonderful magic show that will leave you questioning your eyesight and running to the Eagles Eye Mobile for a check up! In addition to his NFL talents, Jon is a frequent Hollywood and Las Vegas headliner who also performs for many private celebrity parties - you won't want to miss this rare opportunity to see him perform live! Tickets available for presale, $10 each.

If this isn't a reason to go to the Eagles Carnival, I don't know what is.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on June 27, 2007, 01:50:20 PM
That snippet makes me wish I wasn't an eagles fan.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MURP on June 27, 2007, 02:33:02 PM
classic
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Munson on June 27, 2007, 03:51:29 PM
It'd be worse if he played a star posistion like WR or QB or sosmethin. Luckily he's just the longsnapper and people don't really pay attention to him.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Wingspan on June 27, 2007, 04:51:14 PM
If someone were to be the "longsnapper of CF"...I wonder who that would be? Anyone have any suggestions?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on June 27, 2007, 07:06:41 PM
Sassy
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on June 28, 2007, 05:57:43 AM
(http://images.usatoday.com/travel/_photos/2006/10/06/in-eagles-large.jpg)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on June 28, 2007, 07:49:21 AM
Nice.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on June 28, 2007, 08:02:36 AM
I wouldn't get on that thing.  It'll probably crash and burn just before reaching its destination city.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on June 28, 2007, 08:04:28 AM
i just checked on razorgator and ticket prices are outrageous....southwest is the way to go
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on June 28, 2007, 08:12:51 AM
Quote from: EagleFeva on June 28, 2007, 08:02:36 AM
I wouldn't get on that thing.  It'll probably crash and burn just before reaching its destination city.

Ha.  I get it.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Geowhizzer on June 28, 2007, 09:18:30 AM
Quote from: EagleFeva on June 28, 2007, 08:02:36 AM
I wouldn't get on that thing.  It'll probably crash and burn just before reaching its destination city.

Boo.  Thanks for reminding me, ya big jerk.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MDS on June 28, 2007, 01:59:19 PM
Who's flying that thing, JFK Jr?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: General_Failure on June 29, 2007, 01:26:13 AM
Banner, but they have to give him a phone book to sit on first.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyGirl on July 04, 2007, 09:41:16 PM
Not a a single post in this forum for like 6 days.

I had to post here.

Camp is in 23 days. :crazy



PS...I am starting up BOTW again, so this is my shameless promotion to check it out.  ;D
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on July 04, 2007, 09:47:51 PM
Are you guys coming up this year?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyGirl on July 04, 2007, 10:22:26 PM
H.E.L.L no. lol
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on July 05, 2007, 08:12:52 AM
Quote from: PhillyGirl on July 04, 2007, 09:41:16 PM
Not a a single post in this forum for like 6 days.

I had to post here.

Camp is in 23 days. :crazy



PS...I am starting up BOTW again, so this is my shameless promotion to check it out.  ;D
We need some crazy stalker pics PG, you need to go
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on July 05, 2007, 09:25:22 AM
what is BOTW
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyGirl on July 05, 2007, 09:49:33 AM
Quote from: Seabiscuit36 on July 05, 2007, 08:12:52 AM
Quote from: PhillyGirl on July 04, 2007, 09:41:16 PM
Not a a single post in this forum for like 6 days.

I had to post here.

Camp is in 23 days. :crazy



PS...I am starting up BOTW again, so this is my shameless promotion to check it out.  ;D
We need some crazy stalker pics PG, you need to go

That was mini-camp LOL

igy...see the "General" forum.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Don Ho on July 05, 2007, 05:12:39 PM
Quote from: PhillyGirl on July 04, 2007, 09:41:16 PM
Not a a single post in this forum for like 6 days.

I had to post here.

Camp is in 23 days. :crazy



PS...I am starting up BOTW again, so this is my shameless promotion to check it out.  ;D

I too was a little concerned when the last post was about Nasti Nate. 

Thanks for the reminder on 23 days and counting.  Saw a buddy at the coffee shop yesterday and he said "Hey, the Phillies are only 5 games out and it's the fourth of july."  I always tell him every year if the phils are within 5 games at the fourth of july I will believe.  This year I don't believe squat.  I do believe in training camp though.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Munson on July 05, 2007, 05:14:04 PM
http://philadelphiaeagles.com/news/Story.asp?story_id=13152 (http://philadelphiaeagles.com/news/Story.asp?story_id=13152)

Hahaha whose head will explode first?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on July 06, 2007, 08:29:25 AM
QuoteThe kick return position has some depth with veteran Bethel Johnson and Jeremy Bloom, whose rookie season was lost last year because of a hamstring injury, but punt returner is not as sturdy. If Sampy can shine in practice, he might get a shot there. Bloom is the projected starter and has to prove he can stay healthy, and the Eagles want to limit Brian Westbrook and Lito Sheppard in the punt returner because of injury risks.
I'm guessing they are definitely bringing back Bethel
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: QB Eagles on July 06, 2007, 01:27:39 PM
Quote from: Seabiscuit36 on July 06, 2007, 08:29:25 AM
QuoteThe kick return position has some depth with veteran Bethel Johnson and Jeremy Bloom, whose rookie season was lost last year because of a hamstring injury, but punt returner is not as sturdy. If Sampy can shine in practice, he might get a shot there. Bloom is the projected starter and has to prove he can stay healthy, and the Eagles want to limit Brian Westbrook and Lito Sheppard in the punt returner because of injury risks.
I'm guessing they are definitely bringing back Bethel

The website still has Johnson on the roster and depth chart, and there's no mention of his release on the transactions page.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: QB Eagles on July 08, 2007, 12:29:42 PM
NFL.com has "Countdown to Camp: Philadelphia Eagles" as the top video on the main page. It features commentary by new Saint LB Dhani Jones.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Geowhizzer on July 08, 2007, 12:32:28 PM
I'm tingly from all the excitement.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyGirl on July 08, 2007, 02:58:02 PM
Quote from: QB Eagles on July 08, 2007, 12:29:42 PM
NFL.com has "Countdown to Camp: Philadelphia Eagles" as the top video on the main page. It features commentary by new Saint LB Dhani Jones.

Did I miss something? Last week he was still an UFA? LOL
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Phanatic on July 08, 2007, 11:08:34 PM
Quote from: PhillyGirl on July 08, 2007, 02:58:02 PM
Quote from: QB Eagles on July 08, 2007, 12:29:42 PM
NFL.com has "Countdown to Camp: Philadelphia Eagles" as the top video on the main page. It features commentary by new Saint LB Dhani Jones.

Did I miss something? Last week he was still an UFA? LOL

Dhani's an NFL super star who's never had to back it up on the field... farg that!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Dillen on July 09, 2007, 02:07:59 PM
Quote from: PhillyGirl on July 08, 2007, 02:58:02 PM
Quote from: QB Eagles on July 08, 2007, 12:29:42 PM
NFL.com has "Countdown to Camp: Philadelphia Eagles" as the top video on the main page. It features commentary by new Saint LB Dhani Jones.
Did I miss something? Last week he was still an UFA? LOL
Considering your last recollection was him being a free agent a week ago, and now you just saw he's on New Orleans, yeah, you missed something.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on July 09, 2007, 02:10:12 PM
Quote from: Dillen on July 09, 2007, 02:07:59 PM
Quote from: PhillyGirl on July 08, 2007, 02:58:02 PM
Quote from: QB Eagles on July 08, 2007, 12:29:42 PM
NFL.com has "Countdown to Camp: Philadelphia Eagles" as the top video on the main page. It features commentary by new Saint LB Dhani Jones.
Did I miss something? Last week he was still an UFA? LOL
Considering your last recollection was him being a free agent a week ago, and now you just saw he's on New Orleans, yeah, you missed something.

::)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on July 10, 2007, 01:54:22 PM
Oh Dave  ::)
QuoteEAGLES SITE OFFERING UP GAMBLING ADVICE

One of the realities of the only truly slow two or three weeks on the NFL calendar is that a mistake will get magnified, simply because there isn't much else to talk about.

Bill Maas, for example, has gotten a lot more press for his Illinois arrest in early July than he ever would have seen if it had happened in November.

We mention this dynamic because a reader has pointed out to us an interesting comment from the Eagles' official web site that probably wouldn't have struck us an interesting if there was actually something football-related to talk about right now.

In a July 7 blog entry from Dave Sparado (who does a great job and has been very kind to us over the years . . . now that we've gotten that out of the way we'll proceed with kicking him in the nuts) seems to advocate gambling on NFL games.

Specifically, Spadaro writes:  "I noticed in the newspaper the other day that the Eagles are three-point favorites for the opening game in Green Bay.  Maybe I'm wrong for addressing this, but take the Eagles right now.  I love the Eagles in that game against the Packers."

Dave, you should have listened to that little voice that was telling you that you might be "wrong for addressing this."  That little voice is usually right, as we've learned the hard way too many times. 

Gambling is the 6,000-pound elephant at the NFL's all-you-can-eat buffet.  The league puts out bales of hay and baskets of peanuts for him, and then otherwise acts like he isn't there.

In our view, Spadaro's comment acknowledges the elephant in very un-NFL style.  Though we don't think he should be punished for this, we have a feeling that the comment won't be on the Eagles' site for much longer.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: QB Eagles on July 10, 2007, 09:54:20 PM
That story is just plain ludicrous. Nobody bets on football games.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on July 10, 2007, 09:55:21 PM
Anymore.  So called parity ruined all that!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on July 11, 2007, 04:22:16 AM
The season's over before it even got started. (http://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/news/Story.asp?story_id=13166)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: phillywin2k5 on July 11, 2007, 03:35:29 PM
Dave " The Greek" Spadaro offering betting wisdom  :-D
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on July 11, 2007, 03:43:51 PM
i was on spads board today and he said buck and greg lewis are gonna compete with bloom for the KR job
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on July 11, 2007, 03:45:55 PM
What about BILLY SAMPY?  Is that kid going to get in the mix and compete?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on July 11, 2007, 03:47:15 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on July 11, 2007, 03:43:51 PM
i was on spads board today and he said buck and greg lewis are gonna compete with bloom for the KR job

that's so awful that I'm at a loss for words
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on July 11, 2007, 04:14:57 PM
At first I though IGY was just "funning" with us.

Then I saw this...


QuoteDaveSpadaro

post Today, 02:19 PM
Post #4

PhiladelphiaEagles.com
********

Group: Admin
Posts: 17174
Joined: 27-February 03
Member No.: 383
Team: Eagles

As far as I know, there are no plans to bring in another KR. Bloom will get a long look, but the team is also looking at other players in those roles. Buckhalter, for example, could get a shot returning kickoffs along with Greg Lewis and a few other guys. We already know the Eagles have other weapons at punt returner.

:puke
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on July 11, 2007, 04:31:46 PM
Dave should be banned from using the word weapons to describe slightly-above-average players life.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on July 11, 2007, 05:44:15 PM
He's no worse than you bucko
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MDS on July 11, 2007, 06:07:03 PM
I can't wait to get to Lehigh so I can feel up Spadaro's balls.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on July 11, 2007, 06:48:48 PM
Quote from: Diomedes on July 11, 2007, 05:44:15 PM
He's no worse than you bucko

The fact that you believe that makes me smile a little bit, like I will when you inevitably commit suicide.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: reese125 on July 11, 2007, 08:43:20 PM
Quote from: Jerome99RIP on July 11, 2007, 04:14:57 PM
At first I though IGY was just "funning" with us.

Then I saw this...


QuoteDaveSpadaro

post Today, 02:19 PM
Post #4

PhiladelphiaEagles.com
********

Group: Admin
Posts: 17174
Joined: 27-February 03
Member No.: 383
Team: Eagles

As far as I know, there are no plans to bring in another KR. Bloom will get a long look, but the team is also looking at other players in those roles. Buckhalter, for example, could get a shot returning kickoffs along with Greg Lewis and a few other guys. We already know the Eagles have other weapons at punt returner.

:puke


Why in the hell would you even attempt to put Buck back there, knowing damn well hes your only legit (I use that word with caution of course) back-up running back to Westbrook.

PR/KR are the riskiest positions/plays in football. Unless your elusive as Westbrook, you have no business being back there

Lewis--has no tackle breaking ability and is comparable to Mahe running with the football,  and Buck is just not right. That would be god-awful
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on July 11, 2007, 08:55:21 PM
theres a good chance buck doesnt even make the team to insinuate he could win the KR job is just ludicrous
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on July 11, 2007, 09:15:50 PM
I usually don't come down on Dave because I understand what his function is (organizational lacky, mouthpiece... whatever) but that comment was awful.  And I told him so in that thread.

I personally don't see any room on the team for him now that Tony Hunt's been drafted and I think a backfield that consists of Westbrook, Moats & Hunt is better than whatever Buck still has left in the tank.  Regardless, Buck has about as much business running back kickoffs as my fat farging ass does.

It's absurd to even suggest it.  The Greg Lewis thing is so preposterous it doesn't even bear repeating.  Ever.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on July 11, 2007, 09:17:55 PM
Buck should have been off the team two years ago. But he wasn't and he won't miss the cut this year either. Andy Reid loves to keep his cheap injury-machines around as long as possible.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on July 11, 2007, 09:25:25 PM
normally id agree but like romey said the hunt factor changes the dynamic this year...if hunt learns the offense to the point of even being competant then i think buck is gone
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on July 11, 2007, 11:03:55 PM
Moats is outta here long before Buck.  He's the one that'll end up on the outside looking in.



Btw... not sure where to post this one so:

QuoteTSN - The Sports Network

7/11/2007


Hamilton, Ontario – The Hamilton Tiger-Cats announced today that the team has signed import wide receiver Darnerien McCants.

McCants, a 6-3, 215-pound native of Odenton, Maryland has five years of NFL experience under his belt split between the Washington taterskins (2001-04) and the Philadelphia Eagles (2005). In 41 career NFL games, McCants recorded 58 receptions for 744 yards and eight touchdowns.

Prior to turning pro, McCants played at Delaware State where he made 36 catches, 692 receiving yards and 18 touchdowns as a senior. His touchdown total set Delaware State and MEAC records and also led all players in Division I-AA.

Darnerian... WHAT THE farg IS THIS? (http://www.darnerienmccants.com/)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on July 12, 2007, 06:29:09 AM
Moats is outta here long before Buck.  He's the one that'll end up on the outside looking in.

its hard for me to see andy keeping two big backs...again this is why we have traning camp but i think andy would like to see hunt be able to play this year and see the light switch go on in moats head and i think thats what hes going to give every chance to happening
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Magical_Retard on July 12, 2007, 01:20:11 PM
if hunt is able to do what buck did for us, and hopefully more, than i would let go of buck and keep moats. moats hopefully can learn to return kickoffs and is much faster and more elusive as a runner.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on July 12, 2007, 01:56:45 PM
Moats has been nothing other than a useless roster spot. Maybe 'the light will go on' for him this season, but if he isn't getting it they should cut bait.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Father Demon on July 12, 2007, 02:31:29 PM
Quote from: EagleFeva on July 11, 2007, 11:03:55 PM
Darnerian... WHAT THE farg IS THIS? (http://www.darnerienmccants.com/)

Well, Darnerien is a "hottie"
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on July 12, 2007, 05:42:38 PM
(http://assets.philadelphiaeagles.com/uploads/photo/thumbs/18676.jpg)

(http://assets.philadelphiaeagles.com/uploads/photo/thumbs/18675.jpg)

fatty
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on July 12, 2007, 05:45:42 PM
Boooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!  Put in Kolb!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: shorebird on July 12, 2007, 06:09:13 PM
I wouldn't say he's fat, but he's not cut either. Still, he looks to be in good shape for a guy who has missed 12 games in the last two years.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on July 12, 2007, 06:35:39 PM
are you fargers kidding?  he looks great.  did none of you see Peyton Manning on SNL?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on July 12, 2007, 06:47:06 PM
The instant McNabb is as good as Manning I'll cut him some slack for having a beer gut.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on July 12, 2007, 06:54:58 PM
beer gut?  get a grip you farging idiot
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on July 12, 2007, 06:59:18 PM
(http://assets.philadelphiaeagles.com/uploads/photo/thumbs/18675.jpg)

(http://www.barefootfan.com/uploaded_images/Serena%20Williams%20swimsuit.jpg)


:paranoid
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on July 12, 2007, 07:09:19 PM
skip, hit
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on July 12, 2007, 07:10:39 PM
Quote from: Diomedes on July 12, 2007, 06:54:58 PM
beer gut?  get a grip you farging idiot

Yes beer gut. There's muscle under there, but he's got the same gut every former athlete who starts drinking a lot has. It's alright to admit. He'll still snuggle with you if you ask nice.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on July 12, 2007, 08:28:31 PM
Quote from: rjs246 on July 12, 2007, 06:47:06 PM
The instant McNabb stops throwing up from exhaustion at the end of games  I'll cut him some slack for having a beer gut.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: mussa on July 12, 2007, 09:40:53 PM
mcnabb looks dreamy
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Beermonkey on July 12, 2007, 11:50:05 PM
Quote from: rjs246 on July 12, 2007, 07:10:39 PM
Yes beer gut. There's muscle under there, but he's got the same gut every former athlete who starts drinking a lot has. It's alright to admit. He'll still snuggle with you if you ask nice.

You're right, McNabb's a lard ass. Look at this guy's abs, he knows how to take care of his body for the rigors of the NFL.

(http://www.wewerethere.mod.uk/ww1/images/e_sepoy_lg.jpg)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: shorebird on July 13, 2007, 06:09:01 AM
Quote from: rjs246 on July 12, 2007, 07:10:39 PM
Quote from: Diomedes on July 12, 2007, 06:54:58 PM
beer gut?  get a grip you farging idiot

Yes beer gut. There's muscle under there, but he's got the same gut every former athlete who starts drinking a lot has. It's alright to admit. He'll still snuggle with you if you ask nice.

Drinking a lot?? Beer gut??? What the hell are you on? I'll grant you he doesn't have cut abs, but beer gut??

This is a classic example of the hard headed neggies around here who couldn't say one thing good about McNabb even with a gun pointed to their heads. It's ridiculous.

Side note: GOOD GAWD!! SV is built like a brick shteinhouse!! I'd luuuuuuuuuv to see that playboy spread!!

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on July 13, 2007, 06:52:49 AM
Oh please. I like McNabb. I'll say plenty positive about him. But as long as we're making fun of the Chris Gocong's of the world for looking like a doughboy, McNabb shouldn't be exempt.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on July 13, 2007, 08:06:20 AM
It doesn't matter anyway.  He's a pocket passer now.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on July 13, 2007, 08:09:13 AM
plus andy "three yards and a cloud of dust" reid is at the helm
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on July 13, 2007, 08:12:19 AM
It doesn't help that Andy constantly says stuff to Donovan like, "Hey, man, you look like you need a farging sandwich."
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on July 13, 2007, 08:44:13 AM
(http://www.spawn.com/toys/football/other/3pack-eagles/images/other_3pack-eagles_photo_02_dp.jpg)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on July 13, 2007, 08:55:42 AM
fat
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on July 13, 2007, 09:35:28 AM
is that modeled after his hit on Jacobs?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Father Demon on July 13, 2007, 09:50:49 AM
Quote from: FastFreddie on July 13, 2007, 08:12:19 AM
It doesn't help that Andy constantly says stuff to Donovan like, "Hey, man, you look like you need a farging sandwich."

A-

It's laugh-worthy.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Magical_Retard on July 13, 2007, 12:58:59 PM

(http://assets.philadelphiaeagles.com/uploads/photo/thumbs/18676.jpg)


his belly button looks huge there.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on July 13, 2007, 01:04:09 PM
ok thats enough
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on July 13, 2007, 01:20:28 PM
This thread passed "enough" about 2 days ago.

I can't wait for the offseason to be over so we can talk about player injuries, coaching fargups and how cheap Lurie is again.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on July 13, 2007, 01:23:33 PM
Andy Reid once called 8 running plays over the course of an entire game. EIGHT!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on July 13, 2007, 01:31:44 PM
in a howling windstorm
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on July 13, 2007, 01:35:27 PM
That's nothing.  Joe Banner used to walk 10 miles in the snow to get to school.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on July 13, 2007, 01:37:34 PM
Jeff Lurie is a Patriots fan.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Wingspan on July 13, 2007, 02:00:26 PM
Andy Reid is a Rams fan...which is why he farged up in 2001
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Butchers Bill on July 13, 2007, 03:50:00 PM
Quote from: Wingspan on July 13, 2007, 02:00:26 PM
Andy Reid is a Rams fan...which is why he farged up in 2001

I thought he was once...then I thought he was a Bucs fan, then a Panthers fan, then a Pats fan.   :boom
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: shorebird on July 13, 2007, 09:32:28 PM
Quote from: rjs246 on July 13, 2007, 06:52:49 AM
Oh please. I like McNabb. I'll say plenty positive about him. But as long as we're making fun of the Chris Gocong's of the world for looking like a doughboy, McNabb shouldn't be exempt.

Yeah, and I'm betting on the taterskins to win the Superbowl.

This thread needs Dirty Harry with a .357 Magnum.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Geowhizzer on July 13, 2007, 10:31:39 PM
(http://www.movieactors.com/photos-2003/eastwood-dirtyharry.jpeg)

Like this?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: MadMarchHare on July 13, 2007, 11:53:13 PM
No, not like that.

Jesus, Dirty Harry looks like a flaming homo in that pic.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Geowhizzer on July 14, 2007, 12:27:52 AM
What do you want from 1971?

(http://www.piranha.addr.com/images/Dirty%20Harry%202.jpg)

Is this better?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: shorebird on July 14, 2007, 05:56:36 AM
I kinda' like this one.

(http://www.imagestation.com/picture/sraid225/pddcebfbab9f171bcdd370dcbd83ff648/e897738f.jpg)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: RezRob on July 16, 2007, 10:30:36 AM
Glad to see homo-eroticism never has an offseason round here.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: shorebird on July 16, 2007, 10:05:58 PM
There ain't nuthin' erotic about Dirty Harry. Sounds like you want to suck his .44 automag.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: shorebird on July 16, 2007, 10:36:56 PM
Quote from: Magical_Retard on July 13, 2007, 12:58:59 PM

(http://assets.philadelphiaeagles.com/uploads/photo/thumbs/18676.jpg)


his belly button looks huge there.



Thats 'cause they had to ream it out when they went in for the hernia operation.

Really though, what can be expected of Dmac this year? He's missed 12 games the last two years. When he was hurt last year, no one was within three yards of him. He just stepped wrong and fell over. What the hell?? Can we really expect him to play 16-18  games this year?? Even as good as he might look in training camp, so what? The odds right now are against him. He's injury prone. If he plays every game I'll be ecstatic.

Were does that leave us then?? Is it rediculous or stupid to talk about who our second string qb is? I don't think so. I'm comfortable with Feeley. Training camp will be very interesting though, with our first pick having been a qb. What is now, our third string qb. The press will be on him like butter on the cobb.

I hope this is the kick in the ass Dmac needs.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: phattymatty on July 17, 2007, 11:40:48 AM
Quote from: shorebird on July 16, 2007, 10:36:56 PM
The press will be on him like butter on the cobb.

horrible.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: mussa on July 17, 2007, 12:14:30 PM
just trade mcnabb. hes worthless. lets put feely in. he can handle 45-50 pass attempts per game. its not the playcalling. the opposing teams have no idea either, its a secret. hell of a gameplan. go eagles. championship.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on July 17, 2007, 01:00:03 PM
Quote from: phattymatty on July 17, 2007, 11:40:48 AM
Quote from: shorebird on July 16, 2007, 10:36:56 PM
The press will be on him like butter on the cobb.

horrible.

Agreed.  I still laughed, though.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Geowhizzer on July 17, 2007, 01:04:27 PM
Quote from: phattymatty on July 17, 2007, 11:40:48 AM
Quote from: shorebird on July 16, 2007, 10:36:56 PM
The press will be on him like butter on the cobb.

horrible.

Yeah, horrible.

It should have been "butter on the Kolb."  :paranoid
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: shorebird on July 17, 2007, 04:35:48 PM
Quote from: mussa on July 17, 2007, 12:14:30 PM
just trade mcnabb. hes worthless. lets put feely in. he can handle 45-50 pass attempts per game. its not the playcalling. the opposing teams have no idea either, its a secret. hell of a gameplan. go eagles. championship.

Interesting. If he was really on the trading block, would there be any team ready to give up a first rounder for him? Certainly not now, but if he stays healthy and plays well all year? The Eagles just drafted a qb in the first round, he will start at some point and time. If not out of nessecity this year, then he'll get his chance next year. I like Feeley, but you have to think he's nothing but a buffer between Kolb and McNabb.

If you want to talk serious about trading McNabb, you better damn site hope he has an injury free year if you want to get anything for him after extending him what, two years ago?? If he gets hurt this year with another major injury, his value is five and dime. Any team could pick him up on waivers if he doesn't retire. If he has a decent year, Ried can stay on track with any schedule he has with Kolb, and we hopfully make the playoffs. This is one of the few years recently were the latter is about all we can really hope for.

Quote from: Geowhizzer on July 17, 2007, 01:04:27 PM
Quote from: phattymatty on July 17, 2007, 11:40:48 AM
Quote from: shorebird on July 16, 2007, 10:36:56 PM
The press will be on him like butter on the cobb.

horrible.

Yeah, horrible.

No one around here ever has appreciated my sense of humor. I was trying to talk some goddamn football here instead of the usual porno goth up the ass your mother stuff. Instead, you guys attack my lame attempt at humor. God, I'll be glad when training camp starts. This offseason has sucked.

I still have a bad taste in my mouth from the way we went out. We might as well have walked of the field and not even lined up for those last two plays. That shtein, and the fact that our franchise qb is a big fat ? has been eating at my gut all offseason.

I'd like to hear honest opinions from everyone on what they think the percentages are pertaining to Dmac not getting injured this year. I'm saying 50-50. I want to see him come back and play the way I know he can, I'm praying for it. But this year, I don't have that feeling that he'll play at the pro-bowl form we've seen before, much less for a whole season. I hope he proves me wrong.




Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on July 17, 2007, 04:43:20 PM
what they think the percentages are pertaining to Dmac not getting injured this year. I'm saying 50-50.


it would be 50-50 if his knee didnt explode last year
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: shorebird on July 17, 2007, 06:19:29 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on July 17, 2007, 04:43:20 PM
what they think the percentages are pertaining to Dmac not getting injured this year. I'm saying 50-50.


it would be 50-50 if his knee didnt explode last year

So your saying it's a 75% chance he gets injured? ouch.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on July 17, 2007, 06:22:36 PM
why even bother trying to play?  he might as well just quit and hand the reins over to Kolb
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Geowhizzer on July 17, 2007, 06:31:00 PM
Shorebird,

I just replied to your lame attempt at humor with an even lamer one.

Hint:  Look at the small print.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Geowhizzer on July 17, 2007, 06:40:23 PM
By the way, I'd give McNabb's chances of lasting the season without a serious injury (missing more than 2 games) at about 30-40%.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: shorebird on July 17, 2007, 06:43:10 PM
Quote from: Geowhizzer on July 17, 2007, 06:31:00 PM
Shorebird,

I just replied to your lame attempt at humor with an even lamer one.

Hint:  Look at the small print.

I totally missed that one.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: shorebird on July 17, 2007, 07:00:54 PM
Quote from: Diomedes on July 17, 2007, 06:22:36 PM
why even bother trying to play?  he might as well just quit and hand the reins over to Kolb

McNabb has never quit. He won't now. He's going to come out like gangbusters, just like last year and the year before. I just hope he can keep it going for a full season. At the best, one would think that he won't be quite as mobile, but still  dangerous.

One of the things that I feel must happen is Reid being commited more to the running game like he was when Garcia was in. That alone would help towards McNabb having an injury free season. farging hard headed Andy Ried can't be that farging dumb not to have seen the difference in the offense. And don't even try and tell me that the offense played well because of Garcia and his great leadership and attitude. Bullcrap. I'd love to see Dmac running an offense with the same gameplan as Garcia had last year. Ried depends way too much on McNabb's arm.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on July 17, 2007, 07:03:42 PM
you drunk?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on July 17, 2007, 07:26:33 PM
So your saying it's a 75% chance he gets injured? ouch.

100% > 1 game
75% > 2-4 games
40% > 8 games

keep in mind tho that im not totally convinced he will even start the season...so they may not deem him ready for game action until say week 3 for example...so that would be two games missed before he even takes a snap
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: methdeez on July 18, 2007, 02:44:06 PM
Football outsiders (a website I highly endorse) ranks the Iggs WR's:
Quote21. Philadelphia (28)

Andy Reid just doesn't put a significant amount of emphasis or effort into collecting wide receivers; he generally spends his money elsewhere, and understands that his offensive scheme makes wide receivers relatively fungible. This year, things are a little different. Reggie Brown (22nd in DPAR and 18th in DVOA) is rounding into a top receiver, and could end up making the same jump Lee Evans made last year. Kevin Curtis is a free agent signing by a team that almost never misses on their free agent signings, and a player who fits the West Coast offense very well. Jason Avant, Greg Lewis and Hank Baskett are the generic little-used high-percentage guys in reserve, and hey, Todd Pinkston's freely-available talent now. This isn't a fantastic group of receivers, but they get the job done.

The taterskins ranking, just for fun:

22. Washington (13)
Quote   If you could have given us our pick of every wide receiver who was acquired through trade or as a free agent following 2005, the last two guys we would have chosen would have been Brandon Lloyd (-16.9 percent DVOA, good for 82nd in the league in 2005) and Antwaan Randle El (-15.1 percent DVOA, 77th in 2005). Shockingly, they did not get better upon arriving in Washington. While Randle El is at least an excellent return man, Lloyd is a locker room malcontent and a possession receiver with the skill-set of a CBA-level rapper; namely, he's tall-ish. Lloyd and Randle El were both awful last year, and there's no reason to think they'll be good in the future.

This should not reflect poorly on Santana Moss or Chris Cooley, both of whom were very good in 2006. Unfortunately for Moss, the lack of concern defenses needed to push toward the other wideouts meant he was double-covered more often than not; merely having an average receiver across from him would free up space for the long game to develop. By the time Washington realizes it, though, Moss' peak as a small, speedy receiver might be past.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on July 18, 2007, 02:53:48 PM
Kevin Curtis is a free agent signing by a team that almost never misses on their free agent signings



(http://www.orlyowl.com/orly4.jpg)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Dillen on July 18, 2007, 03:29:14 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on July 18, 2007, 02:53:48 PM
Kevin Curtis is a free agent signing by a team that almost never misses on their free agent signings
How many signings that are actually notable have they missed? Don't count guys like Jabar Gaffney and Ed Jasper. I know they miss sometimes, every team does, but there hasn't been anything that greatly hurt the team. There hasn't been a lot of total misses, although you could say Kearse and Howard aren't living up to expectations. Kearse finally had a good line with him last year and had a great start, but he got hurt. Howard only had like 6 sacks but played pretty well against the run and was constantly dinged up.

Try and name some big misses as of late. I can't come up with any, but I really didn't think about it much either.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on July 18, 2007, 03:32:41 PM
there aren't many high profile misses because they don't make many high profile signings in general.  i would say Kearse hasn't lived up to his contract in general, Dhani Jones was a miss obviously.  In general they pick up depth guys in free agency that don't make or break a season so it's hard to call them hits or misses.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Wingspan on July 18, 2007, 03:52:00 PM
Quote from: Dillen on July 18, 2007, 03:29:14 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on July 18, 2007, 02:53:48 PM
Kevin Curtis is a free agent signing by a team that almost never misses on their free agent signings
How many signings that are actually notable have they missed? Don't count guys like Jabar Gaffney and Ed Jasper. I know they miss sometimes, every team does, but there hasn't been anything that greatly hurt the team. There hasn't been a lot of total misses, although you could say Kearse and Howard aren't living up to expectations. Kearse finally had a good line with him last year and had a great start, but he got hurt. Howard only had like 6 sacks but played pretty well against the run and was constantly dinged up.

Try and name some big misses as of late. I can't come up with any, but I really didn't think about it much either.

Darren Howard is as close to a bust as I have seen, and then there's Dhani...but other than that, most others have come in and performed to expectations.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on July 18, 2007, 04:07:59 PM
eagles arent much better or worse than most other teams in the nfl...but to single them out as a team that doesnt miss is curious

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: mussa on July 18, 2007, 04:25:15 PM
i don't think mcnabb is really so injury prone as people make him out to be. my point is the gameplan, the playcalling, the protection, his tendancy to not get rid of the ball has had an effect on why he's gotten injured. the year before he took a cheap shot to the ribs, which eventually led him to playing injuried...which led to the sports hernia. last year was just a freak thing, he slipped on the sideline and the worst happened.

Im not ready to put the man on the trading block just yet. call me spadaro, but i think mcnabb has a few good years left in him. we need balanced playcalling and a flexible gameplan or a willingness to adapt more than anything.


Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Geowhizzer on July 18, 2007, 05:15:11 PM
Quote from: mussa on July 18, 2007, 04:25:15 PM
i don't think mcnabb is really so injury prone as people make him out to be. my point is the gameplan, the playcalling, the protection, his tendancy to not get rid of the ball has had an effect on why he's gotten injured. the year before he took a cheap shot to the ribs, which eventually led him to playing injuried...which led to the sports hernia. last year was just a freak thing, he slipped on the sideline and the worst happened.

Im not ready to put the man on the trading block just yet. call me spadaro, but i think mcnabb has a few good years left in him. we need balanced playcalling and a flexible gameplan or a willingness to adapt more than anything.




- Broken ankle
- Sports hernia
- Torn ACL

No, he's not prone to injuries at all...
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on July 18, 2007, 05:20:21 PM
You left out his wounded psyche.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Dillen on July 18, 2007, 05:22:29 PM
Quote from: Geowhizzer on July 18, 2007, 05:15:11 PM
- Broken ankle
- Sports hernia
- Torn ACL

No, he's not prone to injuries at all...
Don't forget the sprained wrist or whatever in the beginning of 2003.

I don't even understand why people argue that someone is/isn't injury prone. He's been hurt a lot. Period. It's pointless to give a player the label "injury prone." And mussa, your post is basically saying if you take him out of risky situations and he won't get hurt as easily. No shtein.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: shorebird on July 18, 2007, 10:11:59 PM
Quote from: Diomedes on July 18, 2007, 05:20:21 PM
You left out his wounded psyche.




Yeah, right, maybe you know a good psychiatrist. But then again, maybe your still lookin'.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on July 18, 2007, 10:28:00 PM
Quote from: Geowhizzer on July 18, 2007, 05:15:11 PM
- Broken ankle
- Sports hernia
- Torn ACL

No, he's not prone to injuries at all...

They're all flukes! Indicative of nothing! NOTHING![/munson]
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on July 19, 2007, 05:09:13 PM
Injury prone is only valid when a player gets hurt easily and under circumstances where a normal person wouldn't hurt the same area. Injury prone: Buckhalter. People don't tear their knees up by bumping it on a helmet in camp. Not injury prone: Having your leg caught under you and your ankle bent sideways - anyone breaks their ankle in that circumstance. Having your leg caught on the grass and planting it so it twists at a bad angle - anyone tears their ACL that way. Having someone spear you in the ribs on a late hit - any normal person has rib cartilage damage.

Some people get nose bleeds easily, meaning they are prone to nose bleeds. If you punch someone hard in the face on 5 seperate occasions, their nose is going to bleed... period. It doesn't mean they are prone to nose bleeds. But if you flick your nose and it starts bleeding... they doesn't happen to the average person. Thus the latter is prone and the former isn't.

Man I gotta start charging money for this knowledge.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Munson on July 19, 2007, 05:29:40 PM
No no...see obviously you're prone to getting your ankle twisted under the pile the wrong way by chance, it doesn't matter that anyone would be injured in that circumstance. [/rjs]


All the Eagles need to do and have needed to do for years is stop dropping him back 50 farging times a game and run the damn ball. There's no need to be putting him in harms way that many times a game. I keep hearing they're going to run the ball more this year, finally...but I'll believe it when I see it. Until then, I'm counting on him throwing 40-50 passes per game the first 6 or 7 games of the year before someone hits that knee at the right angle and his career is over.


Run. The. Ball.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: The BIGSTUD on July 19, 2007, 05:37:20 PM
Yeah, the way the injuries happen don't matter. My friend used to get in a lot of bar fights and get his ass kicked. I guess he was injury prone too, not prone to being a jackass and starting shtein with people.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on July 19, 2007, 06:12:09 PM
You two were made for each other.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Dillen on July 19, 2007, 06:31:42 PM
Quote from: King Cole on July 19, 2007, 05:09:13 PM
Man I gotta start charging money for this knowledge.
Agreed. Perhaps you could start your own website where you need to pay to be a member.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on July 19, 2007, 06:56:38 PM
I just noticed that King Cole is using Chris McPherson's photo as his avatar.

Coincidence or is he really McPherson?  It would explain a lot, actually.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on July 19, 2007, 09:02:25 PM
call me crazy but to me someone is injury prone if they get injured all the time
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Magical_Retard on July 19, 2007, 10:43:52 PM
gotta agree with king on this one...you put anyone in mcnabbs position where he broke his ankle or the rib hit and they get hurt as well.

thats like saying ben rothlisburger (i dont know how to spell his name) is injury prone because he rode his bike into a car.

but that last injury mcnabb suffered was just odd and if he suffers another like that then yeah he is injury prone.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Geowhizzer on July 20, 2007, 12:39:44 AM
Roethlisberger rode into a car and was injured ONCE.

McNabb has been injured more seasons than not in recent memory.

If you don't want to use "injury-prone," the other adjective that comes to my mind may be worse.

Fragile.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Munson on July 20, 2007, 12:52:43 AM
Whether we want to call him injury prone or not, the fact still remains the Eagles need to run the ball more to help prevent him from taking as many shots as he used to dropping back 40-50 times a game, every game.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on July 20, 2007, 01:01:18 AM
And just like that, Munson says something that makes sense. He must have drank himself past key-board smashing and into some sort of indescribable metaphysical state. I don't expect it to last.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Munson on July 20, 2007, 01:30:41 AM
I've been screaming at Reid to run the farging ball for years now.


Unfortunately I'm sober tonight.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Father Demon on July 20, 2007, 02:21:57 AM
Dear God, help me, but King Cole and Munson are spot on with this one.

Yes, "injury prone" is a label, but the connotation is that if you smack McNabb wrong he's going to sprain his pinky finger.  Wrong.  To me, injury prone means that same injury, a lot.  McNabb has been more "unlucky" in the past five years with his injuries.  Accidents that caused injury to anyone in that situation.   If you look at McNabb throughout, he's a tough sunuva bitch.  We all STILL tell the story of 4 TDs on a broken ankle.  But, freakishly weird shtein happens to him.  Maybe it's because the goblin at the hill saw his granddaddy make it with the prize goat or some shtein, but I wouldn't rule out a curse of some sort.

Fact is, McNabb gets hurt a lot, but they are not related injuries.  Is he injury prone?  Nope.  Is he injury-caused-by-Ried/MW-play-calling-philosophy prone?  Most definitely.  Can he dance?  Doubt it -- too white.

But dammit, King Cole and Munson are 100% correct this time.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Munson on July 20, 2007, 02:39:21 AM
Quote from: Father Demon on July 20, 2007, 02:21:57 AM
Dear God, help me, but King Cole and Munson are spot on with this one.

Yes, "injury prone" is a label, but the connotation is that if you smack McNabb wrong he's going to sprain his pinky finger.  Wrong.  To me, injury prone means that same injury, a lot.  McNabb has been more "unlucky" in the past five years with his injuries.  Accidents that caused injury to anyone in that situation.   If you look at McNabb throughout, he's a tough sunuva bitch.  We all STILL tell the story of 4 TDs on a broken ankle.  But, freakishly weird shtein happens to him.  Maybe it's because the goblin at the hill saw his granddaddy make it with the prize goat or some shtein, but I wouldn't rule out a curse of some sort.

Fact is, McNabb gets hurt a lot, but they are not related injuries.  Is he injury prone?  Nope.  Is he injury-caused-by-Ried/MW-play-calling-philosophy prone?  Most definitely.  Can he dance?  Doubt it -- too white.

But dammit, King Cole and Munson are 100% correct this time.

See I've tried explaining this to rjs and the like many a time, they just don't get it.

Injury prone is Buckhalter. Continually tears his knees up, even when contact isn't involved. Guys like Westbrook, looking at his injuries in the NFL, they're all pretty standard for a running back in the NFL. Busted ribs, a swollen knee...the only one that was "rare", a Lis Franc Sprain, would happen to even the toughest of RB's (ie. Duce Staley) if they get their foot rolled over a certain way in the pile. Then the torn triceps tendon...anybody who gets tackled like he did and comes down with all his weight on his arm like that, it's got a good chance of not turning out good. That's why they teach you not to put your arms out to stop your fall if you're going down, just leads to broken bones, elbow/shoulder dislocations, and torn up muscles. You get some bad breaks with the way you fall/get body parts rolled over and twisted up, and you'll get injured. I don't care who you are or how "injury prone" you may be.

To put it simply; McNabb's coming off a torn ACL. Keep him healthy, don't drop him back so damn much, run the ball. End of problem.

If Reid and the rest of the idiots can't follow that simple formula, then expect McNabb to be out by game 8. He's not going to last dropping back and throwing the ball as much as he has been asked to do in years past. Not on a bum knee.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on July 20, 2007, 06:30:11 AM
mcnabb gets injured A LOT...just about every year now you can expect him to not finish the season...that is mother fargin injury prone...the homeresque spin on this one is huge...hope for the best and expect the worst people...the guy is injury prone and if he isnt then no one is
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on July 20, 2007, 07:06:45 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on July 19, 2007, 09:02:25 PM
call me crazy but to me someone is injury prone if they get injured all the time
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: phattymatty on July 20, 2007, 10:01:55 AM
Quote from: Magical_Retard on July 19, 2007, 10:43:52 PM
you put anyone in mcnabbs position where he broke his ankle or the rib hit and they get hurt as well.

or last year with the running out of bounds.  always a dangerous play.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on July 20, 2007, 11:18:44 AM
Injury prone or not injury prone - the bottom line is that he needs to get his ass back on the field. I'm about as big of a McNabb homer as there is, but he needs to be out there. And Reid needs to let Morningwhatever call the shots as he did last year because that dumbass runs the ball more than Andy.

I'm just happy that football in 1 week away. Boner.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: hbionic on July 20, 2007, 11:22:03 AM
I still think its one of two scenarios.

The White Mafia Conspiracy

The White Mafia has threatened McNabb and if McNabb doesn't find a way to injure himself every year they'll injure him White Mafia style.

or

McNabb Is A Robot Experiment

Which would explain lack of emotion and why he keeps short circuiting and why he played on a broken ankle and why he has perfect white, shiny teeth.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Magical_Retard on July 20, 2007, 01:14:30 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on July 20, 2007, 06:30:11 AM
mcnabb gets injured A LOT...just about every year now you can expect him to not finish the season...that is mother fargin injury prone...the homeresque spin on this one is huge...hope for the best and expect the worst people...the guy is injury prone and if he isnt then no one is

how is that being a homer? spin?

maybe injury prone to you is just anyone who gets injured. hell manning would be injury prone too if he took the shots mcnabb took (ankle and ribs).

anyway it doesnt really matter...injury prone or not reid is too dumb to realize that mcnabb is not a superhero and i bet he will revert back to his throwing ways this yr. i mean they say we are going to run more but we hear that every offseason leading into camp. in fact some camp reports even claim how the running game is being more implemented with so and so getting so many reps. it doesnt matter since reid doesnt care.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on July 20, 2007, 01:17:49 PM
how is that being a homer? spin?

i said its homeresque....not being able to admit that your favortite teams qb is injury prone when he unquestionably is

if the cowboys qb had the identical injury history as mcnabb you same people would go crazy if a dallas fan tried to say he wasnt injury prone
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on July 20, 2007, 05:03:36 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on July 20, 2007, 01:17:49 PMif the cowboys qb had the identical injury history as mcnabb you same people would go crazy if a dallas fan tried to say he wasnt injury prone

what's more, you'd be right to say so.  both morally and factually
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: shorebird on July 20, 2007, 10:27:52 PM
Whatever you say about McNabb, whatever label or spin, injury prone or not injury prone, we will be lucky if he makes it through this season without getting hurt. Thats just my opinion. I hope I'm wrong.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on July 21, 2007, 11:53:14 AM
QuoteEx-Eagle Thomas joins La Salle staff

By the Inquirer Staff

William Thomas, six years past his NFL playing days, will join the coaching staff at La Salle University.

Thomas, a two-time Pro Bowl linebacker, spent 10 years in the NFL with the Eagles and Oakland Raiders, recording 37 sacks and 27 interceptions. He retired after the 2001 season.

"William wanted to get into coaching and we had an opportunity, so it worked out well for him to begin his coaching career [here] and for us to have a guy with his experience and knowledge," Explorers coach Tim Miller said yesterday. "I think our players will really value his input."

La Salle finished 3-7 last year and was outscored by more than 10 points per game.

Thomas, 38, will coach the linebackers with Terence Archer.

His experience in coaching is limited to his memories of his days in the NFL.

"I always saw the coaches staying the night and not going home, burning the midnight oil," he said.

Now he's joining the club.


Willie T!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Geowhizzer on July 21, 2007, 12:32:58 PM
Quote from: shorebird on July 20, 2007, 10:27:52 PM
Whatever you say about McNabb, whatever label or spin, injury prone or not injury prone, we will be lucky if he makes it through this season without getting hurt. Thats just my opinion. I hope I'm wrong.

Pretty much sums it up. 

And for those who bank on McNabb's ability to "bounce back" from injuries, remember two things:

1.  This is the most serious injury McNabb's had, in terms of his career.
2.  McNabb turns 30 this season.  It's a lot harder to bounck back once that front number turns.  I found this out the hard way.  Feva's finding this out right... about... now.  ;)

Like Shorbird, and like all Eagles fans (even IGY, I think), I hope I'm wrong.  I want McNabb to come back strong, play 19 games, and win the MVP and the Lombardi Trophy.  But if Vegas were to put the over/under for McNabb's games played at 12, there would be a lot of people betting the under.  Especially since he hasn't hit the over since the Super Bowl season.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on July 21, 2007, 06:34:34 PM
-- Banner was on WIP and says that the last 3 unsigned picks should be done before camp on Friday

-- Didinger thinks that if the Eagles haven't extended LJ Smith by now, it doesn't appear that they're going to
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: General_Failure on July 22, 2007, 12:00:01 AM
Ray's really going out on a limb there.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on July 22, 2007, 09:02:25 AM
really
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on July 23, 2007, 07:36:11 AM
What I don't get about that is that LJ's been a solid, if not spectacular TE since he's been here.  Why does he have to fight so hard for an extension, yet guys like Patterson, who's been aiiight... got extended 2 weeks after signing his rookie deal?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on July 23, 2007, 07:43:12 AM
Smith is obviously looking for a lot more than the Eagles are willing to spend on a tight end.  There's no other explanation.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on July 23, 2007, 10:21:49 AM
Schobel + Celek = win
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on July 23, 2007, 10:40:17 AM
What I don't get about that is that LJ's been a solid, if not spectacular TE since he's been here.  Why does he have to fight so hard for an extension, yet guys like Patterson, who's been aiiight... got extended 2 weeks after signing his rookie deal?

like romey said money and also he plays offense and isnt a lineman...andy is a 100% system guy when it come to offense...he believes that you build an offensive line and you can pretty much put me and you around it and theyll be successful
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on July 23, 2007, 01:51:17 PM
Eskin said last night that he thinks Kolb will be signed by friday.  Beck just signed with the Fins, so that should set the bar
QuoteFINS BAG BECK

John Clayton of ESPN.com reports that the Miami Dolphins have agreed to terms with quarterback John Beck, the team's second-round pick in the 2007 draft.

Beck, a former BYU quarterback, saw his stock rise significantly in the run-up to the draft.  Some teams had him rated as the best overall quarterback.  Others regard him as a good player whose studious-to-the-point-of-nerdy demeanor might not mesh well with the modern pro athlete.

The Fins liked him enough to pass on Brady Quinn with the No. 9 overall pick.

Clayton reports that Beck signed "a three-year deal and an option."  We're not sure what that means, frankly.  It sounds like there's a provision that allows the Fins to pay Beck some additional money in exchange for picking up the fourth year of the deal.  Under the CBA, the maximum duration of contracts for second-round picks is four years.

The distinction between three and four years is critical.  After three years, a player is eligible for restricted free agency. 

Beck is due to receive $2.25 million in guaranteed money.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: methdeez on July 23, 2007, 02:59:02 PM
Football Outsiders review of the Eags line:
Quote7. Philadelphia Eagles (16) Shawn Andrews is the league's best guard, and he makes a huge difference to Brian Westbrook and the rest of the running game. The other guard, Todd Herremans, is probably the weakest point on the Eagles' line, but he is strong in blocking straight ahead. Jamaal Jackson, a 330-pound center, showed a lot of promise in 2006, his first full season as a starter.

Left tackle William Thomas and right tackle Jon Runyan are smart, experienced players who are tasked with the extremely important — and challenging — job of keeping Donovan McNabb upright. The Eagles have great young talent in backups Winston Justice and Max Jean-Gilles, although there have been concerns about work ethic for both.
http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/7036746

The use some interesting stats to judge line performance.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on July 23, 2007, 04:19:26 PM
The reason LJ doesn't have a deal is because the salaries of TEs have skyrocketed. Look no further than Visanthe Shiancoe - he has 35 receptions in 4 years and got himself 5-$18.5M-$7.5M SB from the Vikings.

Daniel Graham got 5yrs $30M and $15M guaranteed from Denver. When you compare his numbers to LJ's they are about the same. Except LJ has more catches and yards despite being in the league one year less.

Smith has said in the media how other TEs are getting crazy money so unless the Eagles go above and beyond Graham's deal, they will let him walk.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on July 23, 2007, 04:23:14 PM
If Chad Lewis can do well in this offense, anyone can do well in this offense. That dude couldn't outrun my meatcicle.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on July 23, 2007, 04:26:00 PM
He couldn't outrun your dick?

What??
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on July 23, 2007, 04:26:29 PM
yeah dude...you farged Chad Lewis, gross
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on July 23, 2007, 04:30:58 PM
He begged for it. What was I supposed to say? Plus he told me he loved me.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: mpmcgraw on July 23, 2007, 04:34:17 PM
Quote from: rjs246 on July 23, 2007, 04:30:58 PM
He begged for it. What was I supposed to say? Plus he told me he loved me.
Then why was he running from you?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on July 23, 2007, 04:36:58 PM
He was playing hard to get. trust me, he wanted it.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on July 23, 2007, 05:50:09 PM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on July 23, 2007, 04:19:26 PM
The reason LJ doesn't have a deal is because the salaries of TEs have skyrocketed. Look no further than Visanthe Shiancoe - he has 35 receptions in 4 years and got himself 5-$18.5M-$7.5M SB from the Vikings.

Daniel Graham got 5yrs $30M and $15M guaranteed from Denver. When you compare his numbers to LJ's they are about the same. Except LJ has more catches and yards despite being in the league one year less.

Smith has said in the media how other TEs are getting crazy money so unless the Eagles go above and beyond Graham's deal, they will let him walk.

ding ding ding

we have a winner.

no way in hell the Eagles pay him what the market is paying TEs

no.way.in.hell
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Wingspan on July 23, 2007, 06:53:41 PM
No way in what?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: mussa on July 23, 2007, 11:06:19 PM
good riddance
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on July 24, 2007, 08:47:57 AM
based on the stockpiled young tight end talent they have, i would have to agree
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on July 24, 2007, 09:32:35 AM
ha
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: mussa on July 24, 2007, 10:20:37 AM
we already have a stockpile of great young receivers, why do we even need a receiving TE????
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Zanshin on July 24, 2007, 10:28:29 AM
If it were possible, Reid would want receiving Offensive Linemen.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on July 24, 2007, 10:34:33 AM
who are these great young receivers?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on July 24, 2007, 10:38:17 AM
why do we even need a receiving TE?

THEY need one because according to the west coast offense user guide a te that can stretch the middle of the field is essential to its success
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on July 24, 2007, 02:41:48 PM
Quote from: SunMo on July 24, 2007, 10:34:33 AM
who are these great young receivers?

I hear Billy Sampy is going to make a strong push.  Sounds hot.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: General_Failure on July 24, 2007, 03:37:51 PM
With all this talent they've got at WR now they don't really need a good TE. Right? Right?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on July 24, 2007, 04:12:15 PM
If Hank Baskett put on 20 pounds of muscle, he'd be an Antonio Gates-like tight end.

:D
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on July 24, 2007, 04:13:02 PM
Quote from: Jerome99RIP on July 24, 2007, 04:12:15 PM
If Hank Baskett put on 20 pounds of muscle, he'd be an Antonio Gates-like tight end.

:D
Maybe not Antonio but he'd be damn good
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on July 24, 2007, 04:17:06 PM
Quoteice grillin you  04:23:17 PM  Viewing the topic The 2007 Offseason Thread.

Ha - wait for it. . .

:-D
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on July 24, 2007, 04:46:54 PM
i have nothing to say thank you
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: BigEd76 on July 24, 2007, 05:17:40 PM
igy is hoping they sign Chris Cooley
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on July 25, 2007, 07:47:57 AM
... because he's dying to see Cooley in a pair of those mignight green nuthuggers.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on July 26, 2007, 08:24:19 AM
QuoteEagles' drive picks up speed at Dover
Players have fun trying to tackle Monster Mile
By KEVIN NOONAN, The News Journal

Posted Thursday, July 26, 2007

Eagles linebacker Omar Gaither buckles his helmet before taking a few laps around the Dover International Speedway on Tuesday. Gaither posted the slowest time as several players enjoyed the outing leading up to the start of training camp this weekend. (Buy photo)

The News Journal/BOB HERBERT


Eagles players and cheerleaders celebrate after a day of driving at Dover's Monster Mile on Tuesday. Place-kicker David Akers set up the activity then logged the fastest speed.
(Buy photo)

The News Journal/BOB HERBERT
DOVER -- Omar Gaither climbed out of the car with a big grin on his face and said excitedly, "I must have been going 1,000 miles per hour, right?''

Well, not exactly. Flying solo, Gaither's top speed was just 92.402 mph.

Meanwhile, Sheldon Brown had no idea how fast he had driven.

"But it felt fast enough to be scared," he said.

On Wednesday, Gaither, Brown and several other Eagles players drove to Dover and then drove around Dover International Speedway. It was an expedition organized by kicker David Akers, an avid NASCAR fan who has become friendly with drivers Dale Earnhardt Jr., Elliott Sadler and Martin Truex.

Of course, there was some danger involved in this trip to Dover, and one or more of the Eagles could have been involved in an accident and been injured just a few days before the start of training camp, but fortunately they all managed to merge onto Del. 1 from I-95 safely.

Akers, a native of Lexington, Ky., loves all kinds of motor sports and he did a little bit of racing in his younger days. He's been a regular at Dover for years and has even spent time in the pit with Sadler's crew. This past June, he was here for the Autism Speaks 400, and over that weekend he hit it off with Truex, who ended up winning the race.

That's also when Akers started the wheels turning for Wednesday's wheel-turning expedition. Monster Racing Enterprises has a program at Dover where fans can ride and/or drive stock cars around a track that has become notorious in racing circles for its high-banked mile oval. And Akers jumped at the chance to jump into a car and drive at a track he's visited many times.

A four-lap ride costs $89 and a 10-lap drive costs $379. You can also do both for $439. Or you can drive 20 laps ($629) or even 30 laps ($899). For more information, call 800-468-6946 or log on to monsterracing.com.

Akers and cornerback Lito Sheppard have both driven cars before at different tracks, including Pocono, so it wasn't a surprise they posted the two top speeds. The players drove 10 laps, and Akers got his car up to 116.807 mph; Sheppard ran his at 109.422 mph.

Not quite up to speed was Gaither, who was the official slowpoke of the group, and Brown, who had a top speed of 94.117 mph. Brown also lost points when he missed pit road after his 10th lap.

The other Eagles who drove on Wednesday were safety Sean Considine (104.040 mph) and punter Sav Rocca (99.310 mph). Akers said other Eagles wanted to come, but stock cars and football players aren't always a good fit.

"[Jon] Runyan would love this," Akers said with a laugh, referring to his 6-foot-7, 330-pound teammate, "but I had to tell him 'No way.' "

The biggest Bird at Dover on Wednesday was Rocca, a former star in Australian football who is trying to make the jump to the NFL this year. The 6-5, 265-pounder had some problems squeezing into his car, but he said the effort was worth it.

"It was really exciting," he said. "We have different kinds of racing [in Australia], but nothing like this. And I can't imagine what it must be like with these stands full of people. How many does this place hold?"

When informed that Dover holds well over 100,000 people, Rocca whistled.

"It must be quite a scene," he said. "I'd love to come back and see a race here sometime, see what it's like when it's the real thing."

All of the players came away with a new perspective on NASCAR and what it takes to be a successful driver -- or, for that matter, any kind of driver.

"I have a lot more respect for those guys now," Brown said. "Just dealing with the heat for a little while made me appreciate what those guys have to endure for hours. And I can't begin to imagine what it would be like with 40 other drivers out there, banging and bumping you at those speeds.

"So, I'll stick to football. You can still get hurt, but it's not at 120 miles per hour."
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on July 26, 2007, 11:38:01 AM
As I mentioned in the 10 questions thread, I saw the pic that accompanied that article and not only does Considine look bulked up, but Sav Rocca is huge. It's him, Akers, Gaither, Sheppard, Considine and Brown in a line. Comparing Rocca to Gaither is laughable because Gaither looks so small for a LB.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhreak54 on July 26, 2007, 11:52:02 AM
(http://i14.tinypic.com/4tjdhk8.jpg)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on July 26, 2007, 11:57:35 AM
Considine actually looks more like a footballer in that pic.  I cant wait to see Rocca in camp. 
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: phillywin2k5 on July 26, 2007, 12:00:35 PM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on July 26, 2007, 11:52:02 AM
(http://i14.tinypic.com/4tjdhk8.jpg)

looks like the Right Stuff movie poster
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on July 26, 2007, 12:04:08 PM
or every cheesy action movie that's been made in the past 10 years
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on July 26, 2007, 12:10:08 PM
are we really analyzing how considine looks dressed in a nascar suit in a picture that is taken from a distance and then translating that to how hes gonna play this year or getting some sort of excitement out of it

all time board low
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Dillen on July 26, 2007, 12:12:45 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on July 26, 2007, 12:10:08 PM
are we really analyzing how considine looks dressed in a nascar suit in a picture that is taken from a distance and then translating that to how hes gonna play this year or getting some sort of excitement out of it
...No, we're not.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on July 26, 2007, 12:26:32 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on July 26, 2007, 12:10:08 PMall time board low

this benchmark is achieved every ten posts or so

and more often than that if I'm not posting much
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on July 26, 2007, 01:54:31 PM
Quote from: SunMo on July 26, 2007, 12:04:08 PM
or every cheesy action movie that's been made in the past 10 years

Yeah, I was thinking "Armageddon".
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on July 26, 2007, 02:23:29 PM
i said cheesy...not best film ever made
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on July 26, 2007, 05:04:44 PM
Any movie with Steve Buscemi is a candidate.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: General_Failure on July 26, 2007, 05:47:34 PM
The one were Sandra Bullock plays a recovering alcoholic?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on July 27, 2007, 08:24:26 AM
Quote from: General_Failure on July 26, 2007, 05:47:34 PM
The one were Sandra Bullock plays a recovering alcoholic?

Steve Buscemi + Viggo Mortensen = automatic win!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on July 27, 2007, 08:49:02 AM
Quote from: FastFreddie on July 27, 2007, 08:24:26 AM
Quote from: General_Failure on July 26, 2007, 05:47:34 PM
The one were Sandra Bullock plays a recovering alcoholic?

Steve Buscemi + Viggo Mortensen = automatic win!
Speaking of Vigo, i was in my basement thismorning, i have one of those Mr. Beer Kits and on the side of the box there's some guy holding a beer. His reflection was in my mirror and it scared the shtein out of me, first thing i thought of was (http://content.answers.com/main/content/wp/en/thumb/0/04/180px-Vigo_the_Carpathian.jpg) holy shtein it looks like vigo. 

Commence the bashing
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Feva on July 27, 2007, 08:53:45 AM
Found out about Vigo, the master of Evil...
Try to battle my boys?!?! That's not legal!!!

Ow!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on August 24, 2007, 02:55:55 PM
QuoteNEW YORK--

NFL commissioner Roger Goodell announced today that the NFL season will be prolonged indefinitely until every starter in the league suffers an injury. So far only a dozen first stringers have gone down in the meaningless games, a number Goodell said fell far short of expectations.

"We've seen some lovely injuries this preseason, but the number has been way to low," Goodell told reporters today. "There are still scores of starting players who remain healthy. So we're going to keep scheduling these games in the hopes that every player suffers some kind of an injury, preferably a season-ending one. After all, what is the point of playing exhibition games if everyone's going to come out of it healthy? We haven't seen one prayer circle yet. What a waste of time."

Goodell also announced that ticket prices for the remaining games would be tripled just for the hell of it.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on August 24, 2007, 03:02:28 PM
viggo plays a russian gansgter in a movie out this fall and supposedly he is bad ass x 10
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SD_Eagle5 on August 26, 2007, 12:59:25 AM
Go Green:
(http://thecreatorsfingerprints.com/picts/eagles_ads1.jpg)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on August 27, 2007, 11:25:46 AM
QuoteEagles Notes | Trade of Holcomb appears likely

More on the Eagles
PITTSBURGH - Barring injury to one of the Eagles' other three quarterbacks, Kelly Holcomb is probably spending his final days in Philadelphia.
According to a league source, as many as four teams have contacted the Eagles about acquiring Holcomb, and the team intends to move him this week as long as Donovan McNabb, A.J. Feeley and rookie Kevin Kolb got through last night's preseason game against the Pittsburgh Steelers healthy.

Two of the teams involved in talks with the Eagles are the Minnesota Vikings and Atlanta Falcons. The Eagles are hoping to get at least a sixth-round pick in return for Holcomb, but they may have to settle for a seventh-round selection.

The Vikings are in desperate need of a veteran backup quarterback to Tarvaris Jackson, a second-year player who is opening the season as a starter for the first time in his career. At the moment, Brooks Bollinger is Jackson's projected backup, but he is coming off a pathetic performance Saturday in the Vikings' 30-13 loss to the Seattle Seahawks.

Given that head coach Brad Childress' offense is so similar to what the Eagles run, it would seem to be a natural fit for Holcomb to move to the Vikings.

The Falcons, of course, have their own well-publicized problems at quarterback created by Michael Vick's dogfighting saga, which ended with his indefinite suspension last week. The Falcons also lost backup D.J. Shockley to injury. At the moment, their top two quarterbacks are Joey Harrington and Chris Redman.

Another team that might have some interest in Holcomb is the New England Patriots, who recently signed 43-year-old Vinny Testaverde to be their third quarterback behind Tom Brady and Matt Cassel.

Holcomb, acquired in an off-season trade with the Buffalo Bills, became the odd man out in the quarterback rotation as soon as the Eagles made Kolb their first pick in the NFL draft in April. Holcomb has played in just one of the Eagles' three preseason games, completing 7 of 9 passes for 129 yards against the Baltimore Ravens.

Holcomb, 34, did not play in the Eagles' second preseason game against Carolina or last night. He hasn't played in the regular season since 2005 when he started eight games for the Bills and had respectable numbers, completing 67.4 percent of his passes, with 10 touchdowns and eight interceptions.

.

Sav's job. Coach Andy Reid declined to say the punter's job was Sav Rocca's to lose last week, but the former Australian-rules football star may have solidified his roster spot in the first half.

His first punt of the night landed at the 5-yard line but was nullified by a penalty. He backed up 5 yards and put the next punt down at the 9-yard line. Early in the second quarter, Rocca nailed a 59-yard punt that was fumbled by returner Willie Reid and eventually recovered at the 2-yard line for a net punt of 64 yards.

Interest in Trotter. A league source said last night that Tampa Bay and Denver are the only teams that have expressed interest in linebacker Jeremiah Trotter, who was released by the Eagles last week. Both teams apparently are interested in Trotter as a backup, and it seems unlikely that he will be interested in playing that role.

Extra points. Safety Sean Considine left the field at the end of the first half with a mild concussion. . . . Tight end L.J. Smith, bothered by a groin injury for most of the preseason, dressed for pregame warm-ups but did not play, which means he probably will not play a snap in an exhibition game before the Sept. 9 season opener in Green Bay. . . . The Eagles are off today, then resume practice tomorrow at the NovaCare Complex. Initial cuts could come as soon as today. Their final preseason game is Thursday against the New York Jets.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Quasimoto on August 27, 2007, 11:36:48 AM
Maybe Falcons in their desperation will throw us a 6th or 5th round pick
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Magical_Retard on August 27, 2007, 01:14:59 PM
Quote from: Quasimoto on August 27, 2007, 11:36:48 AM
Maybe Falcons in their desperation will throw us a 6th or 5th round pick

sweet then we can use that pick to draft a DE and turn him into a star LB.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: shorebird on August 27, 2007, 04:56:03 PM
Quote from: Magical_Retard on August 27, 2007, 01:14:59 PM
Quote from: Quasimoto on August 27, 2007, 11:36:48 AM
Maybe Falcons in their desperation will throw us a 6th or 5th round pick

sweet then we can use that pick to draft a DE and turn him into a star LB.

:-D :-D

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Magical_Retard on August 28, 2007, 09:58:13 AM
what about tim dwight? hes white like bloom but better.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PhillyPhanInDC on August 28, 2007, 10:52:43 AM
Quote
Is blossom off Bloom as a returner?
He still has the job, but Birds coach Andy Reid has not been impressed.
By Bob Brookover

PITTSBURGH - It wasn't a compliment or a vote of confidence. In fact, coming out of coach Andy Reid's mouth, it bordered on criticism.
After the Eagles' sloppy 27-13 preseason loss to the Pittsburgh Steelers on Sunday at Heinz Field, Reid was asked to evaluate Jeremy Bloom's return work in the team's first three preseason games.

"He's done just OK," the coach said.

"Just OK" probably isn't good enough for a team that has Super Bowl aspirations, which makes you wonder if the Eagles would consider bringing someone else in for return duties before the Sept. 9 season opener at Green Bay.

Bloom, a second-year player who spent all of last season on injured reserve with a hamstring injury, has returned seven punts for 49 yards in the three exhibition games. That's a 7-yard average, a figure that would have ranked 27th in the NFL a year ago.

The kick returns haven't been any better. Bloom has returned nine for 176 yards, a 19.6-yard average. That figure would have ranked 35th in the league last season. Bloom's longest return has been for 26 yards.

"I think there's been some good and there have been some things I'd like to improve on," Bloom said after Sunday's game. "No scores and no real long returns. It's important that we play better, and it starts with me as the returner, because I'm like the quarterback of the offense to an extent. I always have the ball in my hand. We have a lot of room to improve in our return game."

And not much time to do it. The final preseason game is Thursday night against the New York Jets.

The Eagles' hope has been that Bloom's speed would give their return game a dimension it has sorely lacked in the last two seasons. With Reno Mahe as the primary returner last year, the Eagles' kick-return unit ranked ninth in the NFC and tied for 21st in the NFL, with an average starting field position of the 26.4-yard line. Mahe was 13th in the NFC and 26th in the NFL on kick returns, averaging 22.2 yards.

Those aren't good numbers, but they're better than what Bloom has done in his brief audition. Mahe didn't have enough returns to qualify among the league leaders last season, but his 9.4-yard average would have ranked 14th in the NFL.

So far, Bloom has provided just one glimpse of the electrifying return game he flashed during his two seasons at the University of Colorado, when he had four returns of more than 75 yards for touchdowns. That came in the preseason opener against the Baltimore Ravens when he caught a punt on the run at the 28 and took off down the left sideline for a 19-yard return.

"It'll come," Bloom said. "I just think at this level that the opportunities come, but it's just not as common as it is in college. Look at the guys we've played against - there haven't been a lot of long returns. When it does open up, that's when you have to hit it. That's the most important thing."

Bloom has been nursing a sore toe since the Ravens game, and it continues to bother him. He missed a day of practice last week.

"It's been painful, but I knew that was going to be the case," Bloom said. "You also have to remember that it's the preseason and we have a different group out there all the time. We're rotating every position, so it's never that core group. But that's not an excuse for a lack of production."

It is true, however, that during the preseason the coaching staff is always mixing and matching on special teams, trying to find the right combination for coverage and return teams. It is also true that Reid decided to take a look at wide receiver Greg Lewis as the punt returner and running back Correll Buckhalter as the kick returner during the first half of the Steelers game.

"I wanted to give Greg a look in the punt-return area and Buck as a returner on kickoffs," Reid said. "I wanted to be sure I looked at everybody and when it comes down to decision time that I looked at all my options."

Lewis, who has never returned a punt in a regular-season game, did not embarrass himself. He showed some real courage to not call a fair catch on a second-quarter punt by the Steelers' Daniel Sepulveda, then did a nice job on a 5-yard return to the Pittsburgh 44.

Buckhalter, whose only kickoff return came as a rookie in 2001, also did a decent job with a 23-yard return in the second quarter.

But neither Lewis nor Buckhalter did anything to convince the Eagles that their return problems of a year ago are solved. Bloom hasn't provided that kind of certainty, either.

In their first round of cuts yesterday, the New York Jets released wide receiver Tim Dwight, who has been one of the game's better returners of the last decade. But Dwight is 32 and spent all of training camp on the Jets' physically-unable-to-perform list with a foot injury he suffered late last season.

When this preseason started, Bloom had a job to lose as the Eagles' returner. He hasn't lost it, but with one preseason game left, he hasn't exactly secured it, either.

Bloom's toast. Dwight is probably done too, so that would leave who, exactly? I'm having nightmares of a Reno return.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Magical_Retard on August 28, 2007, 12:11:02 PM
Quote from: PPinDC on August 28, 2007, 10:52:43 AM
Quote
Is blossom off Bloom as a returner?
He still has the job, but Birds coach Andy Reid has not been impressed.
By Bob Brookover

PITTSBURGH - It wasn't a compliment or a vote of confidence. In fact, coming out of coach Andy Reid's mouth, it bordered on criticism.
After the Eagles' sloppy 27-13 preseason loss to the Pittsburgh Steelers on Sunday at Heinz Field, Reid was asked to evaluate Jeremy Bloom's return work in the team's first three preseason games.

"He's done just OK," the coach said.

"Just OK" probably isn't good enough for a team that has Super Bowl aspirations, which makes you wonder if the Eagles would consider bringing someone else in for return duties before the Sept. 9 season opener at Green Bay.

Bloom, a second-year player who spent all of last season on injured reserve with a hamstring injury, has returned seven punts for 49 yards in the three exhibition games. That's a 7-yard average, a figure that would have ranked 27th in the NFL a year ago.

The kick returns haven't been any better. Bloom has returned nine for 176 yards, a 19.6-yard average. That figure would have ranked 35th in the league last season. Bloom's longest return has been for 26 yards.

"I think there's been some good and there have been some things I'd like to improve on," Bloom said after Sunday's game. "No scores and no real long returns. It's important that we play better, and it starts with me as the returner, because I'm like the quarterback of the offense to an extent. I always have the ball in my hand. We have a lot of room to improve in our return game."

And not much time to do it. The final preseason game is Thursday night against the New York Jets.

The Eagles' hope has been that Bloom's speed would give their return game a dimension it has sorely lacked in the last two seasons. With Reno Mahe as the primary returner last year, the Eagles' kick-return unit ranked ninth in the NFC and tied for 21st in the NFL, with an average starting field position of the 26.4-yard line. Mahe was 13th in the NFC and 26th in the NFL on kick returns, averaging 22.2 yards.

Those aren't good numbers, but they're better than what Bloom has done in his brief audition. Mahe didn't have enough returns to qualify among the league leaders last season, but his 9.4-yard average would have ranked 14th in the NFL.

So far, Bloom has provided just one glimpse of the electrifying return game he flashed during his two seasons at the University of Colorado, when he had four returns of more than 75 yards for touchdowns. That came in the preseason opener against the Baltimore Ravens when he caught a punt on the run at the 28 and took off down the left sideline for a 19-yard return.

"It'll come," Bloom said. "I just think at this level that the opportunities come, but it's just not as common as it is in college. Look at the guys we've played against - there haven't been a lot of long returns. When it does open up, that's when you have to hit it. That's the most important thing."

Bloom has been nursing a sore toe since the Ravens game, and it continues to bother him. He missed a day of practice last week.

"It's been painful, but I knew that was going to be the case," Bloom said. "You also have to remember that it's the preseason and we have a different group out there all the time. We're rotating every position, so it's never that core group. But that's not an excuse for a lack of production."

It is true, however, that during the preseason the coaching staff is always mixing and matching on special teams, trying to find the right combination for coverage and return teams. It is also true that Reid decided to take a look at wide receiver Greg Lewis as the punt returner and running back Correll Buckhalter as the kick returner during the first half of the Steelers game.

"I wanted to give Greg a look in the punt-return area and Buck as a returner on kickoffs," Reid said. "I wanted to be sure I looked at everybody and when it comes down to decision time that I looked at all my options."

Lewis, who has never returned a punt in a regular-season game, did not embarrass himself. He showed some real courage to not call a fair catch on a second-quarter punt by the Steelers' Daniel Sepulveda, then did a nice job on a 5-yard return to the Pittsburgh 44.

Buckhalter, whose only kickoff return came as a rookie in 2001, also did a decent job with a 23-yard return in the second quarter.

But neither Lewis nor Buckhalter did anything to convince the Eagles that their return problems of a year ago are solved. Bloom hasn't provided that kind of certainty, either.

In their first round of cuts yesterday, the New York Jets released wide receiver Tim Dwight, who has been one of the game's better returners of the last decade. But Dwight is 32 and spent all of training camp on the Jets' physically-unable-to-perform list with a foot injury he suffered late last season.

When this preseason started, Bloom had a job to lose as the Eagles' returner. He hasn't lost it, but with one preseason game left, he hasn't exactly secured it, either.

Bloom's toast. Dwight is probably done too, so that would leave who, exactly? I'm having nightmares of a Reno return.

if only moats could hold on to the ball...i think he would have been perfect for the KR/PR duties. or if they really want Lito would be pretty good at it.

where did bethel johnson sign? i still dont get why we let him go...hes pretty decent for STs. another case of trying to justify a pick and playing a player even if he is not capable/ready/talented.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on August 28, 2007, 12:13:01 PM
theres absolutely no reason westbrook and/or lito cant return punts...and dont bring up the injury excuse because it infuriates me
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on August 28, 2007, 12:14:22 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on August 28, 2007, 12:13:01 PM
theres absolutely no reason westbrook and/or lito cant return punts...and dont bring up the injury excuse because it infuriates me

Bingo.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Magical_Retard on August 28, 2007, 12:15:48 PM
Quote from: ice grillin you on August 28, 2007, 12:13:01 PM
theres absolutely no reason westbrook and/or lito cant return punts...and dont bring up the injury excuse because it infuriates me

well lito especially since westbrook would have to stay in the game and handle the ball a lot in the running and passing game.

why cant we just draft someone we need and not some oddballs who we try to fit into positions and force into the starting lineup?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on August 28, 2007, 12:21:10 PM
Has Eddie Drummond latched on anywhere yet?  He'd be a much better solution than the skier.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on August 28, 2007, 12:23:35 PM
Putting a guy who is absolutely indispensable in as a punt returner is clearly the way to go.

Putting your #1 defensive back in that position is almost as intelligent.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on August 28, 2007, 12:34:31 PM
Quote from: Jerome99RIP on August 28, 2007, 12:23:35 PM
Putting a guy who is absolutely indispensable in as a punt returner is clearly the way to go.

Putting your #1 defensive back in that position is almost as intelligent.

Lito > Dawkins as #1 DB, huh?


Is either solution really worse than putting someone back there that just sucks?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Dillen on August 28, 2007, 12:34:57 PM
Quote from: FastFreddie on August 28, 2007, 12:21:10 PM
Has Eddie Drummond latched on anywhere yet?  He'd be a much better solution than the skier.
KC
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on August 28, 2007, 12:40:14 PM
Quote from: FastFreddie on August 28, 2007, 12:34:31 PM
Quote from: Jerome99RIP on August 28, 2007, 12:23:35 PM
Putting a guy who is absolutely indispensable in as a punt returner is clearly the way to go.

Putting your #1 defensive back in that position is almost as intelligent.

Lito > Dawkins as #1 DB, huh?

Is either solution really worse than putting someone back there that just sucks?

They're both pro bowl players, jackass.  But if you want to get pissy about it, yeah, I'd be more concerned with losing Lito at this point than Dawkins.

And if they lose Westbrook the season is over.  If you want to risk an entire season to get a few more yards on punt returns, that's fine.  I don't.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Butchers Bill on August 28, 2007, 12:45:00 PM
Quote from: FastFreddie on August 28, 2007, 12:21:10 PM
Has Eddie Drummond latched on anywhere yet?  He'd be a much better solution than the skier.

Even this Drummond would be better than Bloom right now.

(http://img154.imageshack.us/img154/4486/millonarios08pi6.jpg)
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: ice grillin you on August 28, 2007, 12:47:48 PM
And if they lose Westbrook the season is over.  If you want to risk an entire season to get a few more yards on punt returns, that's fine.  I don't.

theres no more chance he gets hurt returning punts than if you give him 25 carries a game instead of 20
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on August 28, 2007, 01:08:22 PM
You don't think teams would intentionally go after him when he's standing there totally exposed with his dick in his hands?

That's idiotic to presume otherwise.

If the season hangs in the balance (like it did against the Giants a few years ago) then fine, put him back there.  But exposing him on a weekly basis is beyond stupid.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on August 28, 2007, 07:30:42 PM
I want to see a player return a punt with his dick in his hand.

That would be farging hilarious.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on August 28, 2007, 07:38:51 PM
Hey, listen, I want somebody good - and I mean very good - to return that kick. I don't want my punt returner coming out of that huddle with just his dick in his hands, alright?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on August 28, 2007, 10:42:14 PM
I think I recognize that. Is it from King of New York?
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on August 28, 2007, 10:44:32 PM
close

Mary Poppins 2 - Poppinz to the Groove
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on August 28, 2007, 10:49:20 PM
Justin Timberlake told me that you're special.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on August 28, 2007, 10:52:05 PM
before or after you shared a milkshake with him
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on August 28, 2007, 10:53:20 PM
nm.

Milkshakes jokes are totally below me. And shtein.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on August 28, 2007, 10:54:14 PM
dead
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: SunMo on August 28, 2007, 11:04:01 PM
ha
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: General_Failure on August 29, 2007, 02:18:02 AM
Quote from: FastFreddie on August 28, 2007, 12:34:31 PM
Quote from: Jerome99RIP on August 28, 2007, 12:23:35 PM
Putting a guy who is absolutely indispensable in as a punt returner is clearly the way to go.

Putting your #1 defensive back in that position is almost as intelligent.

Lito > Dawkins as #1 DB, huh?


Actually, yes. The defense would be worse off without Tito than Dawkins. Let Dawk return the farging punts.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on August 29, 2007, 08:17:51 AM
Quote from: rjs246 on August 28, 2007, 10:42:14 PM
I think I recognize that. Is it from King of New York?

The Godfather
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: rjs246 on August 29, 2007, 08:20:39 AM
Quote from: Jerome99RIP on August 29, 2007, 08:17:51 AM
Quote from: rjs246 on August 28, 2007, 10:42:14 PM
I think I recognize that. Is it from King of New York?

The Godfather

Oh my god. Kill yourself.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on August 29, 2007, 08:27:57 AM
Quote from: rjs246 on August 29, 2007, 08:20:39 AM

Oh my god. Kill yourself.

Westbrook isn't injury prone.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on August 29, 2007, 02:04:28 PM
Here's the text of a message I just got from the Eagles on my cell phone:

With a handful of roster spots available, the Eagles are turning to the reserves for the preseason game vs. the Jets.  Who will stand out?

Stop the presses!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on August 29, 2007, 02:07:44 PM
You're an idiot for signing up for that crap, and a compound idiot for spamming us with their spam.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Butchers Bill on August 29, 2007, 02:21:15 PM
Quote from: Diomedes on August 29, 2007, 02:07:44 PM
You're an idiot for signing up for that crap, and a compound idiot for spamming us with their spam.

Werd.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on August 29, 2007, 02:23:50 PM
If you two queers agree on something I know I'm right.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Seabiscuit36 on August 29, 2007, 02:26:43 PM
Quote from: Jerome99RIP on August 29, 2007, 02:23:50 PM
If you two queers agree on something I know I'm right.


no, it means you triggered the Apocalypse
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on August 29, 2007, 02:29:54 PM
We agree on plenty.  For example, we agree that bacon is good, Hoyda is better, and Rome is a fool.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on August 29, 2007, 02:32:50 PM
I'm a fool yet you continually reply to my posts.

Yep - you're a "genious" Dio.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on August 29, 2007, 02:36:05 PM
I'm cute, too.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Rome on August 29, 2007, 02:44:32 PM
You're a credit to your race, Dio.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: PoopyfaceMcGee on August 29, 2007, 03:00:52 PM
Quote from: Jerome99RIP on August 29, 2007, 02:44:32 PM
You're a credit to your race, Dio.

Oh, a not-so-subtle "you're not human" burn!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Munson on August 29, 2007, 03:11:20 PM
Your mom.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: mussa on August 29, 2007, 03:11:47 PM
Eddie Drummond was available there for alittle while, but Chiefs snagged him.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: QB Eagles on August 29, 2007, 08:32:19 PM
Quote from: mussa on August 29, 2007, 03:11:47 PM
Eddie Drummond was available there for alittle while, but Chiefs snagged him.

The Eagles would sign Robert Drummond before Eddie Drummond. I don't think the Eagles have sought to bring in a returner outside of the draft since Brian Mitchell. This is a team that let Reno Mahe return punts for a significant period of time.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: bowzer on August 29, 2007, 08:34:43 PM
Quote from: QB Eagles on August 29, 2007, 08:32:19 PM
Quote from: mussa on August 29, 2007, 03:11:47 PM
Eddie Drummond was available there for alittle while, but Chiefs snagged him.

The Eagles would sign Robert Drummond before Eddie Drummond. I don't think the Eagles have sought to bring in a returner outside of the draft since Brian Mitchell. This is a team that let Reno Mahe return punts for a significant period of time.

Who was that olympic runner?? John Drummond? With our penchant for Jeremy Bloom, Johnny boy might have a chance as well.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Dillen on August 29, 2007, 08:50:17 PM
They should re-consider Justin Gatlin. I hear he's still a free agent.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Geowhizzer on August 29, 2007, 08:59:52 PM
Heck, get Vail Sikahema off the television and get him running back kicks again.  He's even Mormon, so Andy'll love him.

Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: phillywin2k5 on August 31, 2007, 09:36:46 AM
is Critter Edwards still playing in the CFL, call him!
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Dillen on September 05, 2007, 07:53:24 PM
From pe.com:
QuoteBrian Westbrook is a realist. He knows that the team's success on the ground a season ago doesn't mean the Eagles offense will suddenly be run-oriented ...

So I guess the players directly involved know the offense is incredibly unbalanced. farging. Retarded.
Title: Re: The 2007 Offseason Thread
Post by: Diomedes on September 05, 2007, 08:00:21 PM
one can only hope that one of the Reid sons will OD, forcing the old man into sabbatical so he can eat his way through the family trauma