the random musings not worthy of new thread thread

Started by ice grillin you, March 28, 2006, 02:06:37 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

PoopyfaceMcGee

Quote from: Cerevant on July 07, 2008, 02:03:39 PM
The question comes when the baby is born, and has (for example) symptoms of fetal alcohol syndrome.  The child is now alive and a person, and has disabilities and deformities which are the direct results of the mother's actions.  Does this change things?

Parallels exist for children post-birth: if you starve your kid to death, you are a criminal.  If you deny your kids medical treatment, you are a criminal.  I would argue that this situation would not need a new set of laws, but rather an extension of existing child abuse/negligence laws which are enforced primarily on visible effects, rather than prevention.

No.  The mother is not responsible for the child until the child is human by law.  At that point, any and all government assistance or health care that would be available to well-meaning parents to-be would also be available to our perpetrator of "abuse" in this scenario.

There is no parallel here.  The law clearly defines that abortion is not murder, so fetal abuse is not abuse at all in any sense of the word at any time.  The mother is not legally accountable for any sort of crime, even if it's intentional mistreatment of her own pre-birth "child."

Father Demon

There's also a segment of the population that believes a fetus is a person, but doesn't care about abortion because the mother's rights outweigh the unborn child's rights.  These folks could easily be pro-abortion, but anti-fetus damaging. 
The drawback to marital longevity is your wife always knows when you're really interested in her and when you're just trying to bury it.

Wingspan

Quote from: reese125 on July 07, 2008, 01:18:48 PM
I knew I read this recently, so Wingboy--your assumptive statement is wrong

Philadelphia is ranked atop for large airports


http://www.bizjournals.com/philadelphia/othercities/southflorida/stories/2008/05/19/daily27.html

they are ranked in these categories

J.D. Power surveyed travelers on accessibility (good highways), baggage claim, check-in/baggage check process, terminal facilities(oohhh...look dear, there's a GAP here), security check and food and retail services.

This says nothing about what matters, like the price of parking, flight delays, sitting on the runway, ticket prices compared to other airports on the same airline. ya know...the things that matter? Who the hell cares if the airport is close to 95 and 476....or that there is a Gap and a Starbucks inside?

Try again.
Connection Problems

Sorry, SMF was unable to connect to the database. This may be caused by the server being busy. Please try again later.

PoopyfaceMcGee

Quote from: Father Demon on July 07, 2008, 02:14:05 PM
There's also a segment of the population that believes a fetus is a person, but doesn't care about abortion because the mother's rights outweigh the unborn child's rights.  These folks could easily be pro-abortion, but anti-fetus damaging. 

Again, if the mother's rights supersede the unborn child's rights, then the mother should be allowed to do whatever the hell she wants within her rights to herself.  By law, the unborn child is a subsidiary of the mother and not its own being.  So, while the idea of fetal abuse could shake many people and inspire debate, it's a non-starter.  As I said before, it's like saying that sawing someone's head off is more humane than waterboarding.  There is no leg to stand on legally in order to enforce anything of the ilk.

That said, OTHER people can be charged for crimes against a fetus as if the fetus were a person.  That ship sailed a long time ago.  It's only the mother herself that can make unilateral decisions about her own growing fetus, and if you're pro-choice, you should be all for it.

Cerevant

My personal opinion is that there is a point where the blob of cells becomes a person, and that point is some significant time (late 2nd or 3rd trimester) before the baby is born.  I (personally) think there needs to be some consideration for the rights of the child after that point.  

My constant refrain on these issues is you can do what you want until that affects someone else's right to do the same.  If the kid is killed before it is officially a kid, then the kid doesn't have to suffer its entire life with the affliction forced on them by a negligent mother.  Once that boundary is crossed, I think there has to be liability.

Amusing/disturbing tangent - our midwife told us that she was once asked by a mother why her breast milk wouldn't freeze.  "Oh, you mean I shouldn't drink while I'm breastfeeding?"  There's another "why can't I abuse myself" situation that is indefensible.

Since our country insists that every issue be black and white, that puts me on the liberal side.  I think there is room in the middle, but compromise doesn't seem to work in the two-party system.
An ad hominem fallacy consists of asserting that someone's argument is wrong and/or he is wrong to argue at all purely because of something discreditable/not-authoritative about the person or those persons cited by him rather than addressing the soundness of the argument itself.

phattymatty


Seabiscuit36

Quote from: phattymatty on July 07, 2008, 02:46:25 PM
this place really farging sucks lately.
Bierstick is awesome man.  The site gets better after 4 Biersticks
"For all the civic slurs, for all the unsavory things said of the Philadelphia fans, also say this: They could teach loyalty to a dog. Their capacity for pain is without limit." -Bill Lyons

Father Demon

So, today did manly things - electrical repair, repaired my sprinkler system, a little indoor plumbing, some garage work, looked for a job.  And some non-manly things - laundry, changing the sheets, and doing dishes.   The sheets needed changing, nudge, nudge, wink, wink, if you know what I mean.

Manly but doing his share, metro, or partly hbionic?
The drawback to marital longevity is your wife always knows when you're really interested in her and when you're just trying to bury it.

Seabiscuit36

So much like Demons Friends bands, there is a battle of the bands here, if anyone wants to vote, my buddy's band is Cubane.  http://www.myspace.com/cubane

http://www.sparkweekly.com/summerseriesVote

"For all the civic slurs, for all the unsavory things said of the Philadelphia fans, also say this: They could teach loyalty to a dog. Their capacity for pain is without limit." -Bill Lyons

PoopyfaceMcGee


Yeti

Quote from: Father Demon on July 07, 2008, 04:03:53 PM
So, today did manly things - electrical repair, repaired my sprinkler system, a little indoor plumbing, some garage work, looked for a job.  And some non-manly things - laundry, changing the sheets, and doing dishes.   The sheets needed changing, nudge, nudge, wink, wink, if you know what I mean.

Manly but doing his share, metro, or partly hbionic?

If doing the laundry dishes and changing the sheets=more Hoyda tonight, manly.

If you did them because you don't like dirty sheets...........................................

"It's only a matter of time before we get to the future."

Hbionic

Yeti



Jeff Garcias wife.  Wow.  I thought he was a pillow biter.
This was the only Google image fit to post.  Carmella Decesare likes to show where babies come from.
"It's only a matter of time before we get to the future."

Hbionic

rjs246

Is rjs gonna have to choke a bitch?

Let them eat bootstraps.

hbionic

Quote from: Yeti on July 07, 2008, 04:25:47 PM

Jeff Garcia.  Wow.  I thought he was a pillow biter.


You sound so disappointed.
I said watch the game and you will see my spirit manifest.-ILLEAGLE 02/04/05


Yeti

"It's only a matter of time before we get to the future."

Hbionic