2016 Starting QB

[General_Failure]

if the guy who traded a starting qb and a second and a fourth for Bradford is back and Bradford isn't then throw the whole franchise into a volcano

Chip would never throw away a good player for failing to meet his expectations. No sir.

[Eagles_Legendz]

I would try to give Bradford a 2-4 year deal.   His play style aggravates me somewhat (constant checkdowns when down big) but I thought he was pretty good, again, Saturday.  He's never going to be a top-8 QB, but the last 6 games he played he was probably in the 12-15 range, which means they have much larger issues elsewhere to address.

[PhillyPhreak54]

such a dumb question....bradford long term deal is the only option....then spend the entire offseason on WR and OL

Discussion provoking question on a discussion board...whodathunkit

[PhillyPhreak54]

Phreak, are you still wanting Trevone Boykin? I wouldn't mind him in Round 6 or 7 but I don't see him starting for anyone next year. Although he could probably start at WR on the Eagles right away.

Yes I want him in the late rounds for sure. I'd also wouldn't mind Cardale Jones.

[rjs246]

such a dumb question....bradford long term deal is the only option....then spend the entire offseason on WR and OL

if the guy who traded a starting qb and a second and a fourth for Bradford is back and Bradford isn't then throw the whole franchise into a volcano

I wouldn't call this a dumb question because Bradford hardly lit the world on fire, but the rest of this is accurate.

I would love to see a QB who can actually move on this team, but the draft needs to be OL and free agency needs to be WR.

[Chameleon]

You can't let one negative estimated value move lead to more negative estimated value moves. That is fish thinking.

[ice grillin you]

I would try to give Bradford a 2-4 year deal.   His play style aggravates me somewhat (constant checkdowns when down big) but I thought he was pretty good, again, Saturday.  He's never going to be a top-8 QB, but the last 6 games he played he was probably in the 12-15 range, which means they have much larger issues elsewhere to address.

i think he pretty easily could be a top 10 qb with weapons...its taken him some time to get confidence in his knees back...learn a new system.... get his timing back...etc

and hes been steadily progressing...second year in the system a full season plus offseason farther away from the knee injuries with a massive upgrade in weaponry and I think you have a legit qb

[ice grillin you]

Discussion provoking question on a discussion board...whodathunkit

im just saying if chip is here and i think we all agree he will be bradford HAS to be the qb...there are no other scenarios or discussion imo

[Rome]

Bradford is a deer with ticks caught in a tornado.  farg that loser.  I'd rather have Kapernick.  Or frankly anyone other than Sanchez and Bradford. 

[smeags]

kaep is roadkill. Yeah, he'll work out well here.

[hbionic]

Tag Bradford. This franchise spends money on worse things so tagging him wouldn't be bad. If he does great, give him a 3-year deal. If he dies on the field, you can cut him or get him on the cheap the following season.

You give him an offseason and "try" obtaining a #1 WR and a better o-line. This should improve the offense tremendously. You still hunt for a long term option a QB via the draft and cross your fingers.

[BigEd76]

The franchise tag for QB is projected to be $19.75M next year. You guys are OK with that for Bradford?

[ice grillin you]

im ok with paying him that over letting him go for nothing less than a year after you gave up your starting qb and two good draft picks for him

altho i cant imagine a scenario where they don't come to an extended agreement

[Diomedes]

I don't follow the salary cap system, so I have no idea what impact the following might make on the Eagles ability to field a team, but:

Tag Bradford.  Essentially, another one year try out for him.  If he continues to improve, then sign him to big deal.  If not, move on.

In the meantime, lose Sanchez.  Add someone from the draft and get RGIII as your #2.

[Sgt PSN]

Chip is heavily invested in Bradford already, so if chip is back (and he will be #sadface) then bradford has to come back at nearly any financial cost, even 19mil for 1 season. You don't give up a starting qb and a #2 and a #4 draft pick for a 1 year starter.

Bradford did make a ton of progress from week 1 until now and I don't feel like qb is a top need for this team.  I won't say he's my guy moving forward., but if nothing else he's a suitable bridge for a year or 2.  There's far too many other areas with greater needs. OL, WR, LB, CB are all a bigger needs than qb.