Main Menu

Grade Day 1

Started by ice grillin you, April 25, 2009, 11:18:44 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Rome

Eckel is a fat crater-faced horse's ass.


And Kiper gave the Eagles a B- for the draft.   In other words, they didn't pick who he thought they should pick.

And LOL at a "C" for Maclin.  Good God, man. 

The BIGSTUD

Quote from: ice grillin you on April 27, 2009, 04:26:06 PM
im not as down on macklin as eckel seems to be but im not overly happy with the pick either...i would grade that pick at best a C

You said before the draft that if Moreno or Pettigrew were gone then anyone at 21 is game, unless someone unexpected falls.

Moreno wasn't there, but Pettigrew was, and someone unexpected fell. So I assume you locked in on Pettigrew?
Calling it right on the $ since day one.
Just pointing laughing, and living it up while watching the Miami Heat stink it up.

ice grillin you

Quote from: King Cole on April 27, 2009, 07:40:57 PM
You said before the draft that if Moreno or Pettigrew were gone then anyone at 21 is game, unless someone unexpected falls.

Moreno wasn't there, but Pettigrew was, and someone unexpected fell. So I assume you locked in on Pettigrew?


im grading the player not the eagles...strictly talking about how good i think mack might or might not be as opposed to who i thought the eagles should or shouldnt have taken

short of prospects like calvin johnson wr's are very risky...especially quick six footers

i can easily see mack being a complete bust (F)

i dont ever seen him being a number one (so no A)

i do think he could be a productive playmaker and grading out at say a B

therefore btwn a B and an F is about a C-

but i do add in some pts for the excellent value he was which brings him to about a C id even go C+
i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

The BIGSTUD

There's where we differ. It is hard to judge receivers sometimes going in, but I can easily see Maclin being a number one. I think he has all the tools to be a stud receiver in the NFL.
Calling it right on the $ since day one.
Just pointing laughing, and living it up while watching the Miami Heat stink it up.

ice grillin you

i dont even think andy reid can "easily" see him being a stud #1 one wr


there wasnt a single wr in the draft this year you can say that about....those guys dont come around that often....theres maybe been three of them in the last five years or so and mack certainly isnt one of them

could he or someone else in this class turn into a stud 1 ala a steve smith absolutely....but there isnt one you could easily see doing it
i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

Drunkmasterflex

There are a lot of WRs this year that have potential to be #1 guys, but that means all of nothing.  Crabtree is probably the best prospect since Johnson, but they aren't even close.  I think Maclin has the potential just because of how young he is and he won't be counted on to come in and be anything but a situational guy.  That should really help his development, much like it did with Santanio Holmes. 
Official Sponsor of #58 Trent Cole

The gods made Trent Cole-Sloganizer.net

"People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf." George Orwell

Sgt PSN

Quote from: ice grillin you on April 28, 2009, 02:41:39 PM
i dont even think andy reid can "easily" see him being a stud #1 one wr

not that i'm disagreeing with your overall point, but using andy reid as your gauge when it comes to identifying receiver talent doesn't exactly bode well in your favor.