Lito Sheppard - He Once Was An Eagle

Started by Father Demon, April 16, 2008, 02:16:40 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

ice grillin you

im saying what hes saying about lito is true...but lots of times what he says is what the eagles want put out there...its pretty easy to tell the difference
i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

ice grillin you

lito did not show up at the voluntary ota's today
i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

PoopyfaceMcGee


Munson

Not a game, not a game, not a game...
Quote from: ice grillin you on April 01, 2008, 05:10:48 PM
perhaps you could explain sd's reasons for "disliking" it as well since you seem to be so in tune with other peoples minds

jroceagles

I thought for sure he would show

PhillyPhreak54

Not entirely shocking. He'll use this as his protest and then report to camp.

General_Failure

He was confused about which color jersey to wear, spent all day in the locker room.

The man. The myth. The legend.

Cerevant

Quote from: ice grillin you on June 02, 2008, 09:54:18 AM
eskin is an eagle homer of titantic proportions

No, he is a Reid/Banner/Lurie suck up.  Don't you remember him during the Buddy years?  He trashed the team non-stop during those years.
An ad hominem fallacy consists of asserting that someone's argument is wrong and/or he is wrong to argue at all purely because of something discreditable/not-authoritative about the person or those persons cited by him rather than addressing the soundness of the argument itself.

ice grillin you

the buddy years were in the 80's...im talking about now and how he is with the team (obviously)
i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

Seabiscuit36

http://www.sportsargumentwiki.com/index.php?title=Philadelphia_Eagles#Buddy_Ryan

QuoteBuddy Ryan

farg Chuck and DuckKnown as the glory days of the franchise. QB Eagles only had the two Keiths on offense, but the defense was farging incredible with Reggie White, Jerome Brown, Seth Joyner, Clyde Simmons, Eric Allen, and Andre Waters. Still only won one NFC East title, and never could jump past the New York Giants or Washington taterskins.
"For all the civic slurs, for all the unsavory things said of the Philadelphia fans, also say this: They could teach loyalty to a dog. Their capacity for pain is without limit." -Bill Lyons

PhillyPhreak54

QuoteLito Sheppard, cornerback, Philadelphia
When the Eagles signed free agent Asante Samuels to a gazillion-dollar deal, Sheppard became expendable. The club tried to package him in trades before the draft but without luck, so now Sheppard returns to the Eagles as their third cornerback. But for how long? Philadelphia insists he plays there this year, but tell me the Eagles wouldn't jump if someone made them a decent offer. So what's your definition of decent?

GM No. 1: "I wouldn't give you anything for him. I mean that. He's a zone corner who can't play in Cover Two because he won't tackle. He doesn't like to hit. Plus, he gets hurt too much, and he's limited in his coverage skills. He reacts to things, he's instinctive and he has ball skills. But he hasn't played a complete season in the last three years, and he's someone who doesn't want to tackle."

GM No. 2: "Now this is a guy I like. I think he's a terrific player, and I'd be willing to give a third or a future second for him. I don't know that I would look at him as a starter, but he would be no worse than my third cornerback -- and in today's game I think you need three good ones. Anyway, I like him. The downside is that he wants a new contract, and that's a concern. So are the injuries.

One thing I always admired about teams like the Eagles and the Patriots is they do what they want to do, not what the player wants them to do. If the Eagles want to trade him, and they get the right price, he's gone. If they believe they can win with him, they'll keep him. And if they believe he's a distraction they'll cut him. But if you're going to make the deal you better have the contract settled first. No way would I make the trade, then try to work something out."

GM No. 3: "I wouldn't want him, and one reason is that he missed an average of five games over the last three years. So he's always getting hurt. But he's not physical, and he wants a new contract. So you're looking at $6 million to $7 million a year for a guy who plays 10 or 11 games a year and doesn't hit anybody? No thanks."

GM No. 4: "I look at Sheppard as a solid cornerback, maybe the 10th or 11th best guy out there, but he's not someone you build a defense around. Which means I wouldn't be able to pay what I think he's asking. But I would be willing to deal a third-rounder for him because he's young, and he can step in and start for you tomorrow. He's not a physical player, so that will limit his options. He's not going to play for a Tampa-2 defense where your cornerbacks must support the run. But he can play."

http://www.sportsline.com/nfl/story/10855212/1

Shows what I know, I always thought he was above average in the "get physical" department. He's no Deion Sanders or someone like that who wants no part of hitting, but he's no Sheldon Brown either.

PoopyfaceMcGee

You honestly thought he was "above average" in getting physical?  That's idiotic.

Diomedes

It's not so idiotic if you factor in Phreak's somewhat endearing homerism.
There is considerable overlap between the intelligence of the smartest bears and the dumbest tourists." - Yosemite Park Ranger

Wingspan

Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on June 07, 2008, 11:45:52 PM
QuoteLito Sheppard, cornerback, Philadelphia
When the Eagles signed free agent Asante Samuels to a gazillion-dollar deal, Sheppard became expendable. The club tried to package him in trades before the draft but without luck, so now Sheppard returns to the Eagles as their third cornerback. But for how long? Philadelphia insists he plays there this year, but tell me the Eagles wouldn't jump if someone made them a decent offer. So what's your definition of decent?

GM No. 1: "I wouldn't give you anything for him. I mean that. He's a zone corner who can't play in Cover Two because he won't tackle. He doesn't like to hit. Plus, he gets hurt too much, and he's limited in his coverage skills. He reacts to things, he's instinctive and he has ball skills. But he hasn't played a complete season in the last three years, and he's someone who doesn't want to tackle."

GM No. 2: "Now this is a guy I like. I think he's a terrific player, and I'd be willing to give a third or a future second for him. I don't know that I would look at him as a starter, but he would be no worse than my third cornerback -- and in today's game I think you need three good ones. Anyway, I like him. The downside is that he wants a new contract, and that's a concern. So are the injuries.

One thing I always admired about teams like the Eagles and the Patriots is they do what they want to do, not what the player wants them to do. If the Eagles want to trade him, and they get the right price, he's gone. If they believe they can win with him, they'll keep him. And if they believe he's a distraction they'll cut him. But if you're going to make the deal you better have the contract settled first. No way would I make the trade, then try to work something out."

GM No. 3: "I wouldn't want him, and one reason is that he missed an average of five games over the last three years. So he's always getting hurt. But he's not physical, and he wants a new contract. So you're looking at $6 million to $7 million a year for a guy who plays 10 or 11 games a year and doesn't hit anybody? No thanks."

GM No. 4: "I look at Sheppard as a solid cornerback, maybe the 10th or 11th best guy out there, but he's not someone you build a defense around. Which means I wouldn't be able to pay what I think he's asking. But I would be willing to deal a third-rounder for him because he's young, and he can step in and start for you tomorrow. He's not a physical player, so that will limit his options. He's not going to play for a Tampa-2 defense where your cornerbacks must support the run. But he can play."

http://www.sportsline.com/nfl/story/10855212/1

Shows what I know, I always thought he was above average in the "get physical" department. He's no Deion Sanders or someone like that who wants no part of hitting, but he's no Sheldon Brown either.

So, he's being traded for Chad Johnson by the end of the week right?
Connection Problems

Sorry, SMF was unable to connect to the database. This may be caused by the server being busy. Please try again later.

PhillyPhreak54

Quote from: FastFreddie on June 08, 2008, 09:04:55 AM
You honestly thought he was "above average" in getting physical?  That's idiotic.

Bullshtein. He's had a few good hits over the years and I have never looked at him as the type who avoids contact. I mean, there are some corners who will run off the field to avoid a screen block or dive for the legs and hold on to shoelaces but I never saw Lito as one of those guys.

I don't find anything homeriffic about me saying he was above average in the physicality department. He's also never been one to shy away from jamming a guy, and he does that well too.