Political Hippo Circle Jerk - America, farg YEAH!

Started by PoopyfaceMcGee, December 11, 2006, 01:30:30 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

rjs246

#11565
A republican writing in great depth about what is wrong with the republican party and why Rush exacerbates the issue.

QuoteLook at America's public-policy problems, look at voting trends, and it's inescapably obvious that the Republican Party needs to evolve. We need to put free-market health-care reform, not tax cuts, at the core of our economic message. It's health-care costs that are crushing middle-class incomes. Between 2000 and 2006, the amount that employers paid for labor rose substantially. Employees got none of that money; all of it was absorbed by rising health-care costs. Meanwhile, the income-tax cuts offered by Republicans interest fewer and fewer people: before the recession, two thirds of American workers paid more in payroll taxes than in income taxes.

We need to modulate our social conservatism (not jettison—modulate). The GOP will remain a predominantly conservative party and a predominantly pro-life party. But especially on gay-rights issues, the under-30 generation has arrived at a new consensus. Our party seems to be running to govern a country that no longer exists. The rule that both our presidential and vice presidential candidates must always be pro-life has become counterproductive: McCain's only hope of winning the presidency in 2008 was to carry Pennsylvania, and yet Pennsylvania's most successful Republican vote winner, former governor Tom Ridge, was barred from the ticket because he's pro-choice.

We need an environmental message. You don't have to accept Al Gore's predictions of imminent gloom to accept that it cannot be healthy to pump gigatons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. We are rightly mistrustful of liberal environmentalist disrespect for property rights. But property owners also care about property values, about conservation, and as a party of property owners we should be taking those values more seriously.

Above all, we need to take governing seriously again. Voters have long associated Democrats with corrupt urban machines, Republicans with personal integrity and fiscal responsibility. Even ultraliberal states like Massachusetts would elect Republican governors like Frank Sargent, Leverett Saltonstall, William Weld and Mitt Romney precisely to keep an austere eye on the depredations of Democratic legislators. After Iraq, Katrina and Harriet Miers, Democrats surged to a five-to-three advantage on the competence and ethics questions. And that was before we put Sarah Palin on our national ticket.
Is rjs gonna have to choke a bitch?

Let them eat bootstraps.

Geowhizzer

I can't listen to Rush.  Literally can't.  His voice just grates on my nerves.

ATV


Diomedes

There is considerable overlap between the intelligence of the smartest bears and the dumbest tourists." - Yosemite Park Ranger

phillymic2000

http://news.yahoo.com/s/mcclatchy/20090311/pl_mcclatchy/3186392

We will Change now, oh wait not yet let me sign this ish, ok now I'm serious we are now starting Change now, seriously.

:-D This is so fargin stoopid

QuoteObama proposed changing the way special projects are financed, including competitive bidding for spending that goes to for-profit businesses.
But not for the way the govnerment "bids", because we can trust the Government to do it right :paranoid

QuoteThe bill contains 8,816 earmarks worth $7.6 billion , according to Taxpayers for Common Sense.

and yes 7.8bil out of 400 gazillion is not a whole heck of a lot, he looks like a complete ass saying this shtein and then signing it. If getting rid of Earmarks are so fargin important what in the 7.8bil did we really really need. Then again that 7.8bil will save 3.5million jobs, silly me what was i thinking?


MOTHER FARGERS STOP SPENDING MONEY WE AIN'T GOT

ATV

a) Obama said he didn't like it either.

b) Obama said he was going to try to find a procedure to put an end to some of this.

Both of which are an improvement over the last eight years.

General_Failure

An improvement is not what people voted for.

The man. The myth. The legend.

shorebird

Quote from: ATV on March 11, 2009, 10:47:36 PM
a) Obama said he didn't like it either.

b) Obama said he was going to try to find a procedure to put an end to some of this.

Both of which are an improvement over the last eight years.

He said, he said... and has done nothing. This is just more of the same D.C. bullcrap, times ten.

He's going to do something about earmarks the next time, after spending billions that we do not have.

ATV


Munson

Stop whining about government spending.

"Tax and spend" liberalism worked in the 90's..."fiscal conservative" views have not worked since.......
Quote from: ice grillin you on April 01, 2008, 05:10:48 PM
perhaps you could explain sd's reasons for "disliking" it as well since you seem to be so in tune with other peoples minds

shorebird

Quote from: ATV on March 11, 2009, 11:23:25 PM
We'll see.

We'll see what? If he actually will do anything about the type of government and it's wild spending spree that he says isn't what the American people want but is still sitting by watching it happen??

Quote from: Munson on March 12, 2009, 06:31:19 AM
Stop whining about government spending.

"Tax and spend" liberalism worked in the 90's..."fiscal conservative" views have not worked since.......

Yes, stop whining about billions and billions of our money that we do not have being spent on bullcrap projects that are not needed in this time of finacial crisis. Stop whining when you see the government caking itself off with billions of dollars of our money while we struggle to make our mortgage.

Munson=[sheeple]Baaaaaa[/sheeple]

The government produces no money, and doesn't stimulate the economy, only the private sector can do that. No money in any of these bills should be spent on government projects, that is what taxes are for.




Diomedes

I like what Obama did.  He couldn't control this omnibus spending bill because it was negotiated before his time, and he could not reject it either because the government needs to pass the legislation in order to keep running.  So he signed it, and laid out guidelines that make sense.  Earmarks are not necessarily bad.  The way they have been used is the problem.  Anonymous insertion of earmarks, insertion of earmarks ten minutes before the vote, etc.  The rules the admin has proposed will bring transparency and due process to the practice which will greatly improve their usage.  I don't understand why anyone would be so upset with this unless it's simply a matter of being against Obama no matter what he does.

There is considerable overlap between the intelligence of the smartest bears and the dumbest tourists." - Yosemite Park Ranger

PoopyfaceMcGee

The only reason to be upset is that the country can't actually pay for it.

Seabiscuit36

"For all the civic slurs, for all the unsavory things said of the Philadelphia fans, also say this: They could teach loyalty to a dog. Their capacity for pain is without limit." -Bill Lyons

Diomedes

Quote from: FastFreddie on March 12, 2009, 08:33:04 AM
The only reason to be upset is that the country can't actually pay for it.

Yeah, blame Obama for that.
There is considerable overlap between the intelligence of the smartest bears and the dumbest tourists." - Yosemite Park Ranger