official draft pick tracker thread

rjs246 · January 20, 2006, 01:07:31 PM

The Mad Pooper would also be ok if he's healthy, but drafting White in the first would indicate that the team is a)acknowledging that they need more talent at RB and b)putting value on hard-nosed, straight ahead running. I agree that the D needs more help than the O but the importance of this pick and what it would indicate is huge. Which is part of why it will never ever ever happen.

ice grillin you · January 20, 2006, 01:09:16 PM

try not to label lendale as just a big back...hes not...he is very shifty and has some quicks...hes an athlete at rb...he aint no ron dayne

Zanshin · January 20, 2006, 01:11:02 PM

Yeah, yeah. No need for the sales job. Pretty much everyone on here would be onboard with White. We've established that.

BigEd76 · January 20, 2006, 01:14:10 PM

http://www.footballsfuture.com/2006/mock.html

ice grillin you · January 20, 2006, 01:14:51 PM

yeah but everyone wants him as the 'big back'...which is dont think he is...hes just bigger than what they have

and i also think there are several here that would not be on board with a rb in that spot

Zanshin · January 20, 2006, 01:15:37 PM

Well, for us he would be the "big back."

rjs246 · January 20, 2006, 01:15:40 PM

Quote Philadelphia Eagles Marcus McNeill, OT, Auburn
They have to keep McNabb healthy.

I could live with that too.

Mad-Lad · January 20, 2006, 01:17:45 PM

Ron dayne.

when i said big back, i was referring to a RB larger than westrbook who can run inside the tackles. While White would be a hell of an asset, the defensive line/linebackers need help more than anything.

ice grillin you · January 20, 2006, 01:18:20 PM

Seattle Seahawks Tamba Hali, DE, Penn St.
Should go higher on draft day.

isnt a mock draft a prediction of where each player will go on draft day?

SunMo · January 20, 2006, 01:30:33 PM

Justice!

Mad-Lad · January 20, 2006, 01:38:20 PM

EAT MY JUSTICE!

Wingspan · January 20, 2006, 01:48:13 PM

the positions i think they should go for in round 1 on draft day are ones that i know they wont.

Feva · January 21, 2006, 03:19:50 PM

Quote from: ice grillin you on January 20, 2006, 01:14:51 PM
and i also think there are several here that would not be on board with a rb in that spot

If we still have garbage in the front 7 come draft day... count me in that group. Taking ANY RB while we still have holes at DE, DT and OLB would be assinine.

General_Failure · January 21, 2006, 04:10:59 PM

RB is tied with punter near the end of my "Man, I hope they draft this position in the first round" list. It goes like this:

Everything else
RB/Punter
Kicker
QB

BigEd76 · January 22, 2006, 09:37:48 PM

01 - Houston
02 - New Orleans
03 - Tennessee
04 - N.Y. Jets
05 - Green Bay
06 - Oakland
07 - San Francisco
08 - Buffalo
09 - Detroit
10 - Arizona
11 - St. Louis
12 - Cleveland
13 - Baltimore
14 - EAGLES
15 - Atlanta
16 - Miami
17 - Minnesota
18 - Dallas
19 - San Diego
20 - Kansas City
21 - New England
22 - Denver (from WSH)
23 - Tampa Bay
24 - Cincinnati
25 - N.Y. Giants
26 - Chicago
27 - Carolina
28 - Jacksonville
29 - Denver
30 - Indianapolis
31 - Pittsburgh
32 - Seattle