Main Menu

Nine Rushes

Started by rjs246, October 09, 2005, 08:09:28 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Cerevant

Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on October 21, 2005, 08:23:10 AM
Guess what?

Don't look for a lot of running this week either.

SD's run D? 3rd in the NFL.

Their secondary blows. TO is going to devour Jammer.
Fine, I'm all for doing what needs to be done to win.  But if AR isn't going to run, would he please stop calling play action?  No one is impressed, and it just forces Donovan to turn his back to the defense instead of reading it.
An ad hominem fallacy consists of asserting that someone's argument is wrong and/or he is wrong to argue at all purely because of something discreditable/not-authoritative about the person or those persons cited by him rather than addressing the soundness of the argument itself.

Tomahawk

Quote from: Cerevant on October 21, 2005, 10:39:20 AM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on October 21, 2005, 08:23:10 AM
Guess what?

Don't look for a lot of running this week either.

SD's run D? 3rd in the NFL.

Their secondary blows. TO is going to devour Jammer.
Fine, I'm all for doing what needs to be done to win.  But if AR isn't going to run, would he please stop calling play action?  No one is impressed, and it just forces Donovan to turn his back to the defense instead of reading it.

No one is impressed nor more importantly fooled. Donovan is pretty weak at faking it anyway-I don't know if he even really turns his back to the D.

Cerevant

Quote from: Tomahawk on October 21, 2005, 11:03:47 AM
No one is impressed nor more importantly fooled. Donovan is pretty weak at faking it anyway-I don't know if he even really turns his back to the D.
Agreed - he exaggerates the hand off, bending over almost in half to cover the ball.  When he does hand it off, he doesn't follow through with the fake, he looks over his shoulder and watches the play.
An ad hominem fallacy consists of asserting that someone's argument is wrong and/or he is wrong to argue at all purely because of something discreditable/not-authoritative about the person or those persons cited by him rather than addressing the soundness of the argument itself.

WEST is GOD

Jammer is a penalty machine.
THIS SEASON IS OVER AND ANDY'S WORLD IS GRIDL

Offseason needs: 2 DEs, 1 DT, 1 OL, 2 LBs, 1 RB, 2 WRs, 1 TE, 1 KR.

PhillyPhreak54

Play-action isn't just to fool with defense. I know McNabb's play action fakes suck. Qincy Carter was a better seller of the play action fakes than McNabb.

However...when Reid calls PA passes it's not just to hold LBs. A lot of the Eagles protection schemes are out of the PA pass. So many times he calls them because of that.

rjs246

God forbid we ever use the play action to fool a defense. That would just be stupid.
Is rjs gonna have to choke a bitch?

Let them eat bootstraps.

stillupfront

How many times did we run last game?


1/9/06


Very proud sponsor of DarWIN Walker BSSE

Proud to be sponsored by HBionic

PoopyfaceMcGee

I think it might be something like 7, 8, or 10.  Definitely not nine, though.  That'd be silly.

Geowhizzer

They're going for a perfect ZERO today!  :D

rjs246

10 rushes for Westbrook and 4 scrambles by McNabb and a win by the skin on their farging teeth. I'm going to pull my hair out now.
Is rjs gonna have to choke a bitch?

Let them eat bootstraps.

MDS

why dont you just kill yourself. it would make a number of things easier.
Zero hour, Michael. It's the end of the line. I'm the firstborn. I'm sick of playing second fiddle. I'm always third in line for everything. I'm tired of finishing fourth. Being the fifth wheel. There are six things I'm mad about, and I'm taking over.

Larry

By the way the line was blocking, we shouldn't have run the ball at all.
More Mahe please.

Cerevant

Quote from: rjs246 on October 23, 2005, 05:34:18 PM
10 rushes for Westbrook and 4 scrambles by McNabb and a win by the skin on their farging teeth. I'm going to pull my hair out now.
C'mon - look on the bright side - they almost doubled the number of called runs from last week!
An ad hominem fallacy consists of asserting that someone's argument is wrong and/or he is wrong to argue at all purely because of something discreditable/not-authoritative about the person or those persons cited by him rather than addressing the soundness of the argument itself.

PoopyfaceMcGee

The Chargers defense is much better against the run, and Reid always likes to have at least one game to show he does things his way and doesn't listen to the media, his running back, his QB, all of his fans, or even his conscience.

By the way... at the time of this post, San Diego is #3 in the NFL in rushing defense (yards/game).

And Denver, Next week's opponent?  They're #5.  But their passing defense is #26.  It doesn't take Nostradamus to figure out that the gameplan isn't going to be much different on offense for at least one more week.

General_Failure

We outran a great running team. I'll take it.

The man. The myth. The legend.