2005 Point & Laugh At The taterskins Thread

Started by PhillyPhreak54, August 20, 2005, 09:15:22 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Beermonkey

Quote from: archer on August 30, 2005, 10:30:56 PM
Post the one when Pinkston "lost the ball in the lights" :-D. Come on, you know the one :-D. That play empitomizes your team full of yellow bellied sap suckers

Or the pic from the first game, when Pinkston caught about a 40-yard pass, took a shot from Taylor and got up & mocked him.  :-D :-D



archer

Quote from: Beermonkey on August 30, 2005, 11:13:27 PM
Quote from: archer on August 30, 2005, 10:30:56 PM
Post the one when Pinkston "lost the ball in the lights" :-D. Come on, you know the one :-D. That play empitomizes your team full of yellow bellied sap suckers

Or the pic from the first game, when Pinkston caught about a 40-yard pass, took a shot from Taylor and got up & mocked him.  :-D :-D




Ah, chief, looks like a deer-in-the-headlights look to me. He's probably trying to get the license number off the truck that just hit him. ;D

Beermonkey

Quote from: archer on August 30, 2005, 11:21:01 PM
Quote from: Beermonkey on August 30, 2005, 11:13:27 PM
Quote from: archer on August 30, 2005, 10:30:56 PM
Post the one when Pinkston "lost the ball in the lights" :-D. Come on, you know the one :-D. That play empitomizes your team full of yellow bellied sap suckers

Or the pic from the first game, when Pinkston caught about a 40-yard pass, took a shot from Taylor and got up & mocked him.  :-D :-D

Ah, chief, looks like a deer-in-the-headlights look to me. He's probably trying to get the license number off the truck that just hit him. ;D

More like a crazed crackhead who just beat down a drug dealer, saying "Is that all you got bitch!".

archer

seriously though, don't you wish the players would get into these games as much as the fans do? They could could'nt care less if they win or lose, they are all, let me repeat that, all in it for the money, and they view us as the gas that keeps their great engine running.

archer

Quote from: Beermonkey on August 30, 2005, 11:23:23 PM
Quote from: archer on August 30, 2005, 11:21:01 PM
Quote from: Beermonkey on August 30, 2005, 11:13:27 PM
Quote from: archer on August 30, 2005, 10:30:56 PM
Post the one when Pinkston "lost the ball in the lights" :-D. Come on, you know the one :-D. That play empitomizes your team full of yellow bellied sap suckers

Or the pic from the first game, when Pinkston caught about a 40-yard pass, took a shot from Taylor and got up & mocked him.  :-D :-D

Ah, chief, looks like a deer-in-the-headlights look to me. He's probably trying to get the license number off the truck that just hit him. ;D

More like a crazed crackhead who just beat down a drug dealer, saying "Is that all you got bitch!".

Yeah, that to

Tomahawk

Quote from: hkHog on August 30, 2005, 08:14:07 PM
Quote from: Tomahawk on August 30, 2005, 06:02:59 PM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on August 30, 2005, 03:47:20 PM
so everyone agrees that the taterskins have a better D than the eagles?

No; however, I will concede the taterskins do have a very good defense.

How are they not better when they gave up less yards AND less points and were on the field much longer?

The Eagles were tied for second with the Patriots in Points Allowed Per Game at 16.2.

henchmanUK

Once again, it's the same old garbage every year. One skins fan on here is even PROUD of being the NFL's offseason champs every year! :-D The difference between Skins and Eagles fans is that when we suck we KNOW we suck, the deluded Skins fan thinks his/her team is great even when they DO suck. This is why it is FUN to "point and laugh at the taterskins" every year!
"The drunkenness, the violence, the nihilism: the Eagles should really be an English football team, not an American one." - Financial Times, London

Bigskinbauer

Quote from: Tomahawk on August 31, 2005, 12:40:29 AM
Quote from: hkHog on August 30, 2005, 08:14:07 PM
Quote from: Tomahawk on August 30, 2005, 06:02:59 PM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on August 30, 2005, 03:47:20 PM
so everyone agrees that the taterskins have a better D than the eagles?

No; however, I will concede the taterskins do have a very good defense.

How are they not better when they gave up less yards AND less points and were on the field much longer?

The Eagles were tied for second with the Patriots in Points Allowed Per Game at 16.2.
obviously you didn't read before our defense gave up less points, our offense and special teams gave up more points, if you take away offensive and special team points given up, like kick returns, punt returns, INTs for TDs, or fumbles for TDs , from both teams the taterskins would have given up less points, and to the admission of most everyone in here, the defense that gives up the least points is the best.  So i guess we settle that debate. 
GO TERPS

PhillyGirl

"Oh, yeah. They'll still boo. They have to. They're born to boo. Just now, they'll only boo with two Os instead of like four." - Larry Andersen

jeffreyjpa

#279
Quote from: archer on August 30, 2005, 11:07:19 PM
Quote from: jeffreyjpa on August 30, 2005, 10:51:16 PM
Quote from: archer on August 30, 2005, 10:39:23 PM
Quote from: jeffreyjpa on August 30, 2005, 08:55:27 PM
The Eagles rush defense--and, defense overall--stiffened considerably after Trotter moved into the starting MLB position at mid-season. He'll be there out of the gate this year, folks.

That is great news, can't wait to get him in pass coverage covering Portis. :-D I'm like a kid waiting for Christmas ;D

Yeah, Portis tore up the Eagles D (especially as a receiver) last year:

Nov 17:      1 Reception,  - 4 Yds    (17 carries, 37 yards, 2.2 YPC)
Dec 12:      4 Receptions, 22 yds    (23 carries, 80 yards, 3.5 YPC)


Always talking about the past, different offense this year will mean different result, watch,

Oh, yeah, that's right...you guys have already pointed out how much the taterskins' Yards-Per-Catch is up in the PRESEASON. That always directly translates into regular season success. It's like a whole different taterskins offense than last year, they just have all the same players, except they traded an oft-injured WR for an underachieving one.

Tomahawk

Quote from: Bigskinbauer on August 31, 2005, 06:18:56 AM
Quote from: Tomahawk on August 31, 2005, 12:40:29 AM
Quote from: hkHog on August 30, 2005, 08:14:07 PM
Quote from: Tomahawk on August 30, 2005, 06:02:59 PM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on August 30, 2005, 03:47:20 PM
so everyone agrees that the taterskins have a better D than the eagles?

No; however, I will concede the taterskins do have a very good defense.

How are they not better when they gave up less yards AND less points and were on the field much longer?

The Eagles were tied for second with the Patriots in Points Allowed Per Game at 16.2.
obviously you didn't read before our defense gave up less points, our offense and special teams gave up more points, if you take away offensive and special team points given up, like kick returns, punt returns, INTs for TDs, or fumbles for TDs , from both teams the taterskins would have given up less points, and to the admission of most everyone in here, the defense that gives up the least points is the best.  So i guess we settle that debate. 


I would type touche; however, I have been smoking the same crack as the taterskins fans who believe their team has a chance of even being halfway decent so instead I'll type that the taterskins backup defense (Ramsey et al) should learn to tackle better so they're not scored on as much.

PhillyGirl

Quote from: jeffreyjpa on August 31, 2005, 07:42:28 AM
except they traded an oft-injured WR for an underachieving one.

What do you call Santana Moss?  :-D
"Oh, yeah. They'll still boo. They have to. They're born to boo. Just now, they'll only boo with two Os instead of like four." - Larry Andersen

QB Eagles

15 pages? That's too much time spent talking about a worthless team.

T_Section224

Proud Sponsor of Mike Bartrum

PhillyGirl

Not while we are pointing and laughing at them.

Its so much fun. And ignorant Skins fans trying to make completely baseless points are even funnier.  :yay
"Oh, yeah. They'll still boo. They have to. They're born to boo. Just now, they'll only boo with two Os instead of like four." - Larry Andersen