McNabb for Cutler?

Started by mpmcgraw, March 02, 2009, 12:36:09 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

ice grillin you

Quote from: Magical_Retard on April 01, 2009, 10:06:29 PM
And since McNabb choked in the NFC Champ game when the D took it up the arse, I guess Cutler choked the final 3 regular season games away when they lost the division and a shot at the playoffs?

id rather have an accurate cannon armed 25 year old who chokes than an old worm burner throwing choker who got benched last year

Quote from: Magical_Retard on April 01, 2009, 10:06:29 PM
And since McNabb choked in the NFC Champ game when the D took it up the arse, I guess Cutler choked the final 3 regular season games away when they lost the division and a shot at the playoffs?


lol the eagles d took it up the ass but had the ball in mcnabbs hand with the game on the line ready to be won...cutlers d which was the worst in the nfl gave up 52 pts and lost by 30...however you come to the conclusion that cutler choked and mcnabbs d shtein the bed???

you people are straight comedy and really to easy
i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

reese125

will you guys please stop referring back to the 3 friggin games Cutler "blew" in the regular season because it is irrelevant.

The Broncos defense was/has been disgusting for years and Cutler had to carry the load to throw TD's to even keep that team in games and close to playoff contention. As a matter of fact he was 2nd behind Brees in most 4th quarter TD's with 11 to his 12.

So lets see...a guy that knows how to throw 4th quarter TD's to a guy that doesnt, threw for 4500+ yds, is 25 yrs old with a crazy ass arm, accuracy and athleticism? I see....what possibly does he have to offer the eagles.

Father Demon

He better have a pocket full of star wide receivers if he wants to do well here.

This isn't an issue of Cutler vs. McNabb no matter how much IGY wants to pretend it is.  It's an issue of Cutler wouldn't be successful here because he would have shtein for a supporting cast.
The drawback to marital longevity is your wife always knows when you're really interested in her and when you're just trying to bury it.

phillymic2000

Puff Puf pass IGY, Puff Puff Pass!

Magical_Retard

#64
What is laughable is your set of rules/logic, if you have any, and how it changes from sport to sport, team to team, player to player, and situation to situation.

I already stated I would do the trade simply because of the age factor, but I just do not think Cutler is better than McNabb right now. So before you go around labeling ppl blind lovers or homers please learn to read what ppl say.

You then went on to compare choke jobs? WTF? A choke job is a choke job and results in a loss.

Cutler put up great #s with good WRs and Shanahan as his coach. He would be going to a moron for a coach who passes all the time and with less weapons to throw to. Yes the potential might be great but its not a given that he will simply step in and play better than McNabb.

I just would love to see your reaction to when Cutler eventually throws a temper tantrum...you know the real ones he throws vs the imagined ones you dream up off in your head about McNabb.
Marge: I have someone who can help you!
Homer: Is it BATMAN!!??
Marge: No hes a scientist
Homer: Batman is a scientist.
Marge: Its not BATMAN!

Magical_Retard

Quote from: Father Demon on April 01, 2009, 10:24:49 PM
He better have a pocket full of star wide receivers if he wants to do well here.

This isn't an issue of Cutler vs. McNabb no matter how much IGY wants to pretend it is.  It's an issue of Cutler wouldn't be successful here because he would have shtein for a supporting cast.

Well he might be if Reid for some reason decides to provide him with more weapons than he did McNabb.

If that happens it would be the best case scenario for the Eagles and even McNabb.
Marge: I have someone who can help you!
Homer: Is it BATMAN!!??
Marge: No hes a scientist
Homer: Batman is a scientist.
Marge: Its not BATMAN!

reese125

see theres the problem...

we as fans are completely brainwashed by the fact that you need superstar talent on the WR end to win a SB because there must be something wrong if OUR beloved franchise qb cant win a SB with the receivers they have. the facts are that plenty of teams have done just fine without stud WR's and a good defense to win a SB.

did you ever think it might be the qb and somebody else could do better job with what the eagles have?

General_Failure

Quote from: Magical_Retard on April 01, 2009, 10:30:50 PM
Quote from: Father Demon on April 01, 2009, 10:24:49 PM
He better have a pocket full of star wide receivers if he wants to do well here.

This isn't an issue of Cutler vs. McNabb no matter how much IGY wants to pretend it is.  It's an issue of Cutler wouldn't be successful here because he would have shtein for a supporting cast.

Well he might be if Reid for some reason decides to provide him with more weapons than he did McNabb.

Sure, Reid and Banner are going to change their philosophy because of a QB change. Those four NFC Championship losses wouldn't do it, but having Diabeetus Cutler will be the straw that breaks the camel's back!

The man. The myth. The legend.

MDS

mcnabb superbowls = 0

GET OFF HIS COCK YOU HOMERS
Zero hour, Michael. It's the end of the line. I'm the firstborn. I'm sick of playing second fiddle. I'm always third in line for everything. I'm tired of finishing fourth. Being the fifth wheel. There are six things I'm mad about, and I'm taking over.

General_Failure


The man. The myth. The legend.

phillymic2000

Quote from: reese125 on April 01, 2009, 10:34:26 PM
see theres the problem...

we as fans are completely brainwashed by the fact that you need superstar talent on the WR end to win a SB because there must be something wrong if OUR beloved franchise qb cant win a SB with the receivers they have. the facts are that plenty of teams have done just fine without stud WR's and a good defense to win a SB.

did you ever think it might be the qb and somebody else could do better job with what the eagles have?

Stop talkin all this nonsense

reese125

facts are facts brother

see all those stud receivers the Steelers had this year--yeah me too


General_Failure

You wouldn't take Hines Ward over Jesushair McWhitey?

The man. The myth. The legend.

ice grillin you

Quote from: Magical_Retard on April 01, 2009, 10:29:23 PM
He would be going to a moron for a coach who passes all the time and with less weapons to throw to.


did you know that the eagles have run the ball more than denver has since cutler became a full time starter in the nfl...denver has no rb and not a particularly good offensive line...they basically have brandon marshall which is something the eagles dont but if you go overall offensive talent its at least tied and i might give a slight edge to the birds...either way it cant be used as a reason why cutler had a better year than mcnabb


what people dont realize is that when they use their defense mechanism for mcnabb by screaming and shouting for more weapons what they are really saying is our qb isnt good enough...like reece said maybe cutler is good enough to win it all with what the eagles have...we know for certain mcnabb isnt
i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

reese125

Quote from: General_Failure on April 01, 2009, 10:46:27 PM
You wouldn't take Hines Ward over Jesushair McWhitey?

yeah...Hines Ward and those whopping 43 yards he had in the sb--sure why not