With the First Pick in the 2008 NFL Draft, the Philadelphia Eagles Select...

Started by Pissed Off, September 18, 2007, 04:55:39 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

BigEd76

they should've missed the playoffs last year, then Brandon Meriweather would've been an Eagle, damnit

Sgt PSN

Quote from: ice grillin you on January 28, 2008, 10:51:06 AM
and sarge nothing that happened in 2007 means a thing in 2008...especially in todays free agency ridden nfl...add in injuries and parity in general and no game meant anything last year much less late season games when the eagles were out of it

So you don't think that McNabb didn't benefit from not only playing well, but winning a few games to close out the season? 

You don't think that Reggie Brown playing well for the 2nd half of the season meant anything?

Winning 3 games isn't going to propell them to greatness next year.  But it's a lot better than going through the offseason with a 3 or 4 or 5+ game losing streak. 

ice grillin you

i think mcnabb benefitted from playing period not necessarily from playing well...im not suggesting they should have benched him....but i would have sat some others like westbrook...if not for full games then for large parts of them...get people like tony hunt some real run...i would have had a bunch of back up lineman in there as much as possible too...
reggie brown is who he is...what he did in the second half of the season is meaningless in terms of 2008...he had a very good 2006 year and how did that translate to 2007?

i think young guys and guys who have not had much playing time can benefit from playing but i dont see how the 2008 team benefits from the 2007 team winning those games


every year is its own entity in the nfl
i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

rjs246

Quote from: ice grillin you on January 28, 2008, 11:15:26 AM
i think young guys and guys who have not had much playing time can benefit from playing but i dont see how the 2008 team benefits from the 2007 team winning those games

every year is its own entity in the nfl

I actually disagree with that in some ways. There is no literal correlation between one year and the next, but winning begets winning. Fostering an environment where the team's top priority is winning, even when the wins mean nothing, is a good thing in my opinion.
Is rjs gonna have to choke a bitch?

Let them eat bootstraps.

ice grillin you

its not like the eagles are the cardinals tho...they won a playoff game 12 months ago
i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

Sgt PSN

Quote from: rjs246 on January 28, 2008, 11:20:53 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 28, 2008, 11:15:26 AM
i think young guys and guys who have not had much playing time can benefit from playing but i dont see how the 2008 team benefits from the 2007 team winning those games

every year is its own entity in the nfl

I actually disagree with that in some ways. There is no literal correlation between one year and the next, but winning begets winning. Fostering an environment where the team's top priority is winning, even when the wins mean nothing, is a good thing in my opinion.

Exactly.  

Now, had the Eagles decided to run their young guys out there for the last couple of games then I might have been ok with that because it's a good chance to evaluate talent in real game scenerios.  But I'm not a big fan of doing that unless your team is in a no shtein rebuilding mode.  And the Eagles simply aren't at that level yet.  

Sgt PSN

Quote from: ice grillin you on January 28, 2008, 11:23:38 AM
its not like the eagles are the cardinals tho...they won a playoff game 12 months ago

What are you saying?  That something that happened in a previous season isn't just relevant to that season? 

ice grillin you

im saying the eagles won the division in 2006 and finished last in the division in 2007

im sayin teams that make the superbowl often dont make the playoffs the following year

and teams with good players and not a lot of injuries usually win no matter what they did the previous year
i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

Sgt PSN

And I'm saying that it's good for players to go into the offseason on a high note and having a little something to feel good about when there wasn't much to feel good about in the first place.   

ice grillin you

i think for a college basketball team filled with freshman and sophomores that might hold weight

but i find it hard to believe that beating buffalo this year meant something when winning the division and a playoff game meant nothing the year before
i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

Rome

Is an 8-8 or a 5-11 team more attractive to potential free agents?

BigEd76


Rome

Okay, how about potential free agents without scrambled eggs for brains?

ice grillin you

Quote from: Jerome99RIP on January 28, 2008, 11:40:15 AM
Is an 8-8 or a 5-11 team more attractive to potential free agents?

most ridiculous thing youve ever posted
i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

BigEd76

Reggie White chose the non-playoff 9-7 Packers over the wildcard-winning 9-7 taterskins, the division champ 11-5 Dolphins and the Super Bowl-winning 13-3 Cowboys.  FA is all about money and nothing more...