Birds vs. Bucs Game Thread

Started by PhillyPhreak54, October 22, 2006, 09:50:47 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Father Demon

The drawback to marital longevity is your wife always knows when you're really interested in her and when you're just trying to bury it.

Seabiscuit36

Does the idea of Using Baskett and Juqua on ST FG Blocks make sense when the opposing team is kicking over 45yds?  Juqua just because he has hops, and Baskett with his high jumping records/ability? 
"For all the civic slurs, for all the unsavory things said of the Philadelphia fans, also say this: They could teach loyalty to a dog. Their capacity for pain is without limit." -Bill Lyons

PhillyPhreak54

Juqua is out there.

The problem is that Mike Patterson is too. Love ya Mike, but you're 5'10. Runyan and Tra should be in the middle of the DL getting a push and getting their hands up.

Baskett should be playing right behind them.

PoopyfaceMcGee

Quote from: Father Demon on October 24, 2006, 10:12:47 AM
fargers think they won the super bowl down there......

They did.  Less than 4 years ago.

ice grillin you

i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

BigEd76

When asked about the Hanson postgame video, Spadaro responded with this:

QuoteThat's a private issue. I've apologized to Joselio .... I've apologized to Sean Considine.

um

PoopyfaceMcGee

From Bill Simmons:

Quote21. Tampa Bay (2-4)
I have to admit, I was a little more excited about these guys before remembering that they're a bogus roughing-the-passer call and a 62-yard field goal away from being 0-6.

I watched it again after reading this, and he's actually right.  Oh well.

QB Eagles

Quote from: FFatPatt on October 27, 2006, 11:07:40 PM
From Bill Simmons:

Quote21. Tampa Bay (2-4)
I have to admit, I was a little more excited about these guys before remembering that they're a bogus roughing-the-passer call and a 62-yard field goal away from being 0-6.

I watched it again after reading this, and he's actually right.  Oh well.

He was referring to the bogus roughing the passer call in the Bucs-Bengals game that enabled Tampa Bay to win.

PoopyfaceMcGee

Oh yeah.  But the call on McDougle was weak also.  Of course, he took it with such grace that I nearly had forgotten!

PhillyPhreak54

McDougles was a facemask though - not a roughing.

He did grab it. But it should've been 5 yards, not 15. And the idiot shouldn't have Dirk'd the flag (although he did punt the yellow hankie farther than Diggler's punts).

Seabiscuit36

Phreak your right, ive been saying since the play happened it should have been 5 and a 15.  Just a 5 would have been ok, but then Mcdougle had to show he's from the U.  Time to let this thread DIE  :evil
"For all the civic slurs, for all the unsavory things said of the Philadelphia fans, also say this: They could teach loyalty to a dog. Their capacity for pain is without limit." -Bill Lyons

ice grillin you

i thought mcdougles call was ticky tack but on his wip show trotter said it was no question a personal foul...so ill believe him
i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

Sgt PSN

Quote from: Seabiscuit36 on October 28, 2006, 09:22:51 AM
Phreak your right, ive been saying since the play happened it should have been 5 and a 15. Just a 5 would have been ok, but then Mcdougle had to show he's from the U. Time to let this thread DIE :evil

Even if it is just an incidental facemask of the 5 yard variety......as soon as McDumbass kicked the flag it pretty much assured him of getting the max penalty. 

General_Failure


The man. The myth. The legend.

Geowhizzer