Old topic, new topic, F it who cares.

Started by hbionic, March 13, 2006, 07:57:23 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

General_Failure

And today they signed the best end we've seen in a while that might actually do something.

The man. The myth. The legend.

PhillyGirl

Quote from: General_Failure on March 13, 2006, 09:05:22 PM
And today they signed the best end we've seen in a while that might actually do something.

I know, because Kearse was totally USELESS in 2004.  ::)
"Oh, yeah. They'll still boo. They have to. They're born to boo. Just now, they'll only boo with two Os instead of like four." - Larry Andersen

General_Failure

The same number of sacks as the year everyone agrees that he was worthless, so, yeah.

The man. The myth. The legend.

PhillyGirl

Quote from: General_Failure on March 13, 2006, 09:08:09 PM
The same number of sacks as the year everyone agrees that he was worthless, so, yeah.

And it was very well known on here that in 2004, kearse's sack total did NOT reflect his actual play. He had games where he disrupted the crap out of the QB all game long but had only 1 or 0 sacks.
"Oh, yeah. They'll still boo. They have to. They're born to boo. Just now, they'll only boo with two Os instead of like four." - Larry Andersen

General_Failure


The man. The myth. The legend.

PhillyGirl

the fact that you just compared Kearse and Mamula is probably the most ridiculous thing you've ever posted.
"Oh, yeah. They'll still boo. They have to. They're born to boo. Just now, they'll only boo with two Os instead of like four." - Larry Andersen

rjs246

Can't you two see that you're in love with each other?
Is rjs gonna have to choke a bitch?

Let them eat bootstraps.

General_Failure


The man. The myth. The legend.

Rome


Beermonkey

Quote from: PhillyGirl on March 13, 2006, 09:09:52 PM
Quote from: General_Failure on March 13, 2006, 09:08:09 PM
The same number of sacks as the year everyone agrees that he was worthless, so, yeah.

And it was very well known on here that in 2004, kearse's sack total did NOT reflect his actual play. He had games where he disrupted the crap out of the QB all game long but had only 1 or 0 sacks.

He should have our total respect for almost taking of Jake Delhomme's head that season. I still play that clip in slow mo when I'm bored. I sometimes even watch it wearing clothes.

Rome

Quote from: Beermonkey on March 13, 2006, 09:26:30 PM
He should have our total respect for almost taking of Jake Delhomme's head that season. I still play that clip in slow mo when I'm bored. I sometimes even watch it wearing clothes.

Goddammit!  Why did I read that last sentence?

WHY DID I READ THAT LAST SENTENCE??

WHY DID I READ THAT LAST SENTENCE!?!?!

:puke

PhillyPhreak54


rjs246

Ha! Funny stuff, Beermonkey. You've been on your game lately. Don't think us humor snobs haven't noticed.
Is rjs gonna have to choke a bitch?

Let them eat bootstraps.

lonfident

I doubt this question is serious, but the answer is DE is a more important position than LB. Also, Kearse would have to learn a much different style of play.

However, he could line up as a 'Joker' a lot more. Whether or not that would help, I don't know.

DonovanTheMessiah

Kearse got pissed on by Vrabel, how's he going to do covering Shockey, Witten, and Cooley?