official draft pick tracker thread

[Beermonkey]

As good as it will be to lose out and get a better draft pick I simply cannot root against them. I thought about the whole "but we'd get a better draft pick" thing as the game was going on and yet I still find myself rooting for a win.

I'm the same way, but yesterday was, in a sick way, the perfect situation.  A competitive, exciting game, but they lose and advance their draft position.  But, like you, I will never be happy or root for them to lose.

Even if they lose out (which I don't see), I can't see them even making the top 10 anyway. As someone mentioned in another thread, I'd love to see the taterskins WC chance coming down to that last game & the Eagles pissing all over it for them.

[PoopyfaceMcGee]

I definitely had some mixed feelings about yesterday's game.  I did want the Eagles to win, but after the Gibbskins and Cowturds won, I kind of didn't mind that the Giants pulled it out.  I can't say why, but I'd rather see the Giants win the division than the Skins or Pukes.

[Beermonkey]

I definitely had some mixed feelings about yesterday's game.  I did want the Eagles to win, but after the Gibbskins and Cowturds won, I kind of didn't mind that the Giants pulled it out.  I can't say why, but I'd rather see the Giants win the division than the Skins or Pukes.

I feel the same way, as they're the least offensive of the 3 teams to me. I have some decent Giants fans at work & they haven't made it too hard on me this year, so I can deal with their success.

[Cerevant]

I definitely had some mixed feelings about yesterday's game.  I did want the Eagles to win, but after the Gibbskins and Cowturds won, I kind of didn't mind that the Giants pulled it out.  I can't say why, but I'd rather see the Giants win the division than the Skins or Pukes.

I agree - I think it is the difference in the fans:  farg dallas fans are usually bandwagoners, while skin fans are exceptionally delusional.  In this context, Giants fans could be considered tolerable.

[PoopyfaceMcGee]

BTW, speaking of the draft, our buddy "goeagles99" threw out these 5 names as possibilities for the Eagles:

Santonio Holmes - WR, Ohio State
Michael Huff - Safety, Texas
Marcedes Lewis - TE, UCLA
Marcus McNeill - OT, Auburn
Claude Wroten - DT, LSU

[rjs246]

I seriously don't have the first idea what this team should do with their draft. The OL needs help, but they seem to draft 16 OLs every year so what has that accomplished? They need LBs in a serious way, but will they actually be able to pick out a decent player this year? WR is a constant need, but with Reid's inability to develop WRs is that even a good idea? It certainly seems like they need a backup QB who is good at something other than being a Zoolander dead ringer.

Frankly, if by some miracle they get in a position to trade up for Bush, I agree that they should do it. The core of this team isn't changing and will (theoretically) be healthy again next year. I'm sick of stock-piling draft picks and while it's cute that everyone loves Westbrook as a 'weapon' he is not a full-time running back and he has never played a full season without injury. Of course, this will never happen, as FF pointed out because Reid is pig-headed and pops about seven boners at the thought of a pass-catching running back who can't pick up 2 yards on third and 1 to save his life. But if you ask me, and everyone does, if you can get Reggie Bush you do it. Even if he splits time for a year or two, you know that Westbrook is going to be hurt every year and he'll get a chance to start. Whatever. Ryan Moats. Yay.

[Don Ho]

http://www.inside99.net/cgi-bin/webbbs_config.pl?read=162505



With all this talk about Reggie Bush I thought you all might want to read the following about the toughest SOB Bush faced all season.  Something to think about as we consider a replacement for B. Dawk.

[Cerevant]

http://www.inside99.net/cgi-bin/webbbs_config.pl?read=162505



With all this talk about Reggie Bush I thought you all might want to read the following about the toughest SOB Bush faced all season.  Something to think about as we consider a replacement for B. Dawk.

Rainbows!  I HATE rainbows!

[Don Ho]

Rainbows!  I HATE rainbows!

We are now the Warriors after the consulting firm June Jones hired came to the conclusion "rainbows" conjures up images of, well you know what i mean.

[Exit31]

Can you know the mighty ocean? Can you lasso a star from the sky? Can you say to a rainbow 'Hey, stop being a rainbow for a second'? No! Such is Mango!

I say get a linebacker. Greenway, Hodge, Hawk, anyone.

[The BIGSTUD]

I seriously don't have the first idea what this team should do with their draft. The OL needs help, but they seem to draft 16 OLs every year so what has that accomplished? They need LBs in a serious way, but will they actually be able to pick out a decent player this year? WR is a constant need, but with Reid's inability to develop WRs is that even a good idea? It certainly seems like they need a backup QB who is good at something other than being a Zoolander dead ringer.

Frankly, if by some miracle they get in a position to trade up for Bush, I agree that they should do it. The core of this team isn't changing and will (theoretically) be healthy again next year. I'm sick of stock-piling draft picks and while it's cute that everyone loves Westbrook as a 'weapon' he is not a full-time running back and he has never played a full season without injury. Of course, this will never happen, as FF pointed out because Reid is pig-headed and pops about seven boners at the thought of a pass-catching running back who can't pick up 2 yards on third and 1 to save his life. But if you ask me, and everyone does, if you can get Reggie Bush you do it. Even if he splits time for a year or two, you know that Westbrook is going to be hurt every year and he'll get a chance to start. Whatever. Ryan Moats. Yay.

I think they take care of whatever needs they didn't address in free agency with the draft. We can only speculate at this point in what they will address in free agency. My guess is linebacker, receiver, and either a defensive tackle or defensive end.

[General_Failure]

I'd honestly like to see DE and both safety positions addresses. Say what you want about the inept play of Tito and the linebackers, but Kearse, Dawkins, and Lewis have been unimpressive all year.

[Don Ho]

I'd honestly like to see DE and both safety positions addresses. Say what you want about the inept play of Tito and the linebackers, but Kearse, Dawkins, and Lewis have been unimpressive all year.

Touche!

[ice grillin you]

buff over ne nope
det over gb nope
oak over jets nope
tenn over hou yep


not a successful week for the birds


big games this week

arz over hou
oak over cle
balt over gb
stl over phi

[BigEd76]

I'd rather have Baltimore win that game.  We aren't going to catch Green Bay, and a tied record with Baltimore does us no good...