2005 Point & Laugh At The taterskins Thread

[PhillyPhreak54]

Extreme doing what they do best...

Crying about the refs.

[MDS]

There is a definate bias against the Skins. With talent like they have, it has to be a conspiracy as to why they dont win every game 2332-0

[Feva]

Could it be that the mighty, mighty taterskins have fallen back to the level of the lowly Eagles? 

[General_Failure]

Incontheivable!

[Sgt PSN]

Extreme doing what they do best...

Crying about the refs.

I haven't been over there but I'm going to guess they're bitching and complaining about the spot the refs gave Priest Holmes on a 4th and 1 late in the game. 

[Bigskinbauer]

 

10 catches.  172 yards.  2 TDs. 

He is averaging 125 per game

This man doesn't deserve to be on a zesty 3-2 team that is tied in last in their division. 

[Sgt PSN]

Moss had a hell of a game today.  I'd say it was just because he was going up against a zesty Chiefs defense but he out performed TO against the same defense.  I don't think too many people would argue that Moss might be the biggest surprise in the league so far this year.  He's been outstanding for the Skins......a lot better than I thought he'd be. 

But the Skins still suck. 

[PhillyGirl]

TO = double/triple teamed.

Moss? Not so much.

[Feva]

10 catches.  172 yards.  2 TDs. 

He is averaging 125 per game

This man doesn't deserve to be on a zesty 3-2 team that is tied in last in their division. 

No... but the rest of his overachieving team does.

[Sgt PSN]

TO = double/triple teamed.

Moss? Not so much.

Against the Chiefs?  No he wasn't.  TO saw a lot of single coverage during that game because the Chiefs were so determined to stop Westbrook.  TO was wide open all day. 

Now if you're talking about in general, then yes.  TO sees a lot more double teams than Moss does.  But if Moss keeps going at his current rate, he'll start seeing those types of coverages as well.  The question is, will he still be productive when facing said coverage? 

[PhillyGirl]

TO = double/triple teamed.

Moss? Not so much.

Against the Chiefs?  No he wasn't.  TO saw a lot of single coverage during that game because the Chiefs were so determined to stop Westbrook.  TO was wide open all day. 

Now if you're talking about in general, then yes.  TO sees a lot more double teams than Moss does.  But if Moss keeps going at his current rate, he'll start seeing those types of coverages as well.  The question is, will he still be productive when facing said coverage? 

I meant in general.

[MDS]

Santana is obviously the second coming of Art Monk. Jeez.

[Sgt PSN]

TO = double/triple teamed.

Moss? Not so much.

Against the Chiefs? No he wasn't. TO saw a lot of single coverage during that game because the Chiefs were so determined to stop Westbrook. TO was wide open all day.

Now if you're talking about in general, then yes. TO sees a lot more double teams than Moss does. But if Moss keeps going at his current rate, he'll start seeing those types of coverages as well. The question is, will he still be productive when facing said coverage?

I meant in general.

I kind of figured that but wasn't sure.  Regardless, I agree with what you're saying then. 

[Bigskinbauer]

I would definatly say T.O is better than moss so don't get your panties in a bunch.  Now i do feel that Moss is a very good receiver and moss and TO will both go to the pro bowl.

But then again moss is on pace for 2020 yards 13 TDs, 106 receptions and a 19.1 average per catch.  Those numbers are unheard of.

[MDS]

It's week 6. And who cares about the pro bowl.