Ready for the Raider Nation?????

Started by bk, September 20, 2005, 09:18:11 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Philidelphia Bills

Quote from: PhillyGirl on September 20, 2005, 11:15:00 PM
Quote from: Philidelphia Bills on September 20, 2005, 11:08:18 PM
Quote from: PhillyGirl on September 20, 2005, 11:05:21 PM
Explain to me, then...how is it not?
Cause the raiders weren't in the NFL to make you cry in 1960, like in 81


Still missing the point. You say the Eagles wins back then were inconsequential, fine.

But Salary Cap era Super Bowls mean nothing in today's game. NOTHING. Its just as inconsequential.

What have the Raiders done since the salary cap was implemented?

I'm not missing your weak ass "point".  Its just too pathetic.

Super Bowls mean NOTHING eh? This is why you are incoherent.  You are stretching and straining to come up with something remotely meaningful to justify your championshipless history.  Do you understand that the raiders were not even in the league before 67(?)?  Saying super bowls are meaningless is pretty damn silly, and if that's your only argument, then damn, that's weak.

Salary Cap?  Raiders have been to a few championship games, been to a Super Bowl..
Play some real football teams and the eagles will come back to earth. 




General_Failure

Quote from: bo still knows on September 20, 2005, 11:22:07 PM
Quote from: General_Failure on September 20, 2005, 11:19:05 PM
I dunno, a game that's over by halftime is pretty impressive to me. But I also like shiny things.
yea against the 49ers. that really shouldnt be considered impressive.

It won't be impressive this week either, but I'll still get a kick out of it.

The man. The myth. The legend.

PhillyGirl

Quote from: bo still knows on September 20, 2005, 11:22:07 PM
Quote from: General_Failure on September 20, 2005, 11:19:05 PM
I dunno, a game that's over by halftime is pretty impressive to me. But I also like shiny things.
yea against the 49ers.  that really shouldnt be considered impressive.

against any team, putting in your 2nd/3rd stringers by the middle of the 3rd quarter could be considered successful. They had just beaten the Rams the week before, so it wasn't like they were unable to win a game.
"Oh, yeah. They'll still boo. They have to. They're born to boo. Just now, they'll only boo with two Os instead of like four." - Larry Andersen

RandytheRaider

Quote from: PhillyGirl on September 20, 2005, 11:20:21 PM
Quote from: RandytheRaider on September 20, 2005, 11:18:40 PM
hey phillygirl,i missed you there,now are you convinced that the superbowl wasnt renamed??yea,im 14 but it looks like i just schooled you in something about football,go back on your NFL history you dumbass

What are you talking about? The Super Bowl renamed? Who in the hell said that?

does "just before they got a pretty little name like the superbowl" ring a bell?

Philidelphia Bills


Philidelphia Bills

Quote from: PhillyGirl on September 20, 2005, 11:16:06 PM


And where has that gotten the Raiders since the Salary Cap was introduced?

Same place its got the green birdies, dumbass.   




PhillyGirl

Quote from: Philidelphia Bills on September 20, 2005, 11:23:08 PM

I'm not missing your weak ass "point".  Its just too pathetic.

Super Bowls mean NOTHING eh? This is why you are incoherent.  You are stretching and straining to come up with something remotely meaningful to justify your championshipless history.  Do you understand that the raiders were not even in the league before 67(?)?  Saying super bowls are meaningless is pretty damn silly, and if that's your only argument, then damn, that's weak.

Salary Cap?  Raiders have been to a few championship games, been to a Super Bowl..
Play some real football teams and the eagles will come back to earth. 

First, can any of you get through a post without an insult added to it?

Second, how can you possibly call the Eagles Championship-less? So the NFL existed before the Raiders were there, that doesn't make the Eagles successes non-existent! Is that what you're trying to say? That the Eagles haven't won anything because in order for them to have won anything, the RAIDERS had to have been part of the NFL?
"Oh, yeah. They'll still boo. They have to. They're born to boo. Just now, they'll only boo with two Os instead of like four." - Larry Andersen

RandytheRaider

Quote from: PhillyGirl on September 20, 2005, 11:21:27 PM
Quote from: bo still knows on September 20, 2005, 11:20:23 PM
Quote from: PhillyGirl on September 20, 2005, 11:15:00 PM
Quote from: Philidelphia Bills on September 20, 2005, 11:08:18 PM
Quote from: PhillyGirl on September 20, 2005, 11:05:21 PM
Explain to me, then...how is it not?
Cause the raiders weren't in the NFL to make you cry in 1960, like in 81


Still missing the point. You say the Eagles wins back then were inconsequential, fine.

But Salary Cap era Super Bowls mean nothing in today's game. NOTHING. Its just as inconsequential.

What have the Raiders done since the salary cap was implemented?
again they have done the same as the eagles in the salary cap era.

Exactly. So what is all of this, "You can't win anything" nonsense when the Eagles have been an extremely successful team in the past few years? Recent years, not history so old that no one gives a rats ass about. LOL...well, except for those idiot Dallas and Washington fans, of course.  ;)
lol you guys would too,but its just that you guys dont know how it feels like to win a superbowl so you use a lame excuse like that

bo still knows

Quote from: PhillyGirl on September 20, 2005, 11:23:24 PM
Quote from: bo still knows on September 20, 2005, 11:22:07 PM
Quote from: General_Failure on September 20, 2005, 11:19:05 PM
I dunno, a game that's over by halftime is pretty impressive to me. But I also like shiny things.
yea against the 49ers.  that really shouldnt be considered impressive.

against any team, putting in your 2nd/3rd stringers by the middle of the 3rd quarter could be considered successful. They had just beaten the Rams the week before, so it wasn't like they were unable to win a game.
the rams are one of the most overrated teams in the nfl.  again you did it against a 49ers team that the starters would be 2nd and 3rd stringers on any other team in the nfl.

PhillyGirl

Quote from: RandytheRaider on September 20, 2005, 11:23:45 PM
Quote from: PhillyGirl on September 20, 2005, 11:20:21 PM
Quote from: RandytheRaider on September 20, 2005, 11:18:40 PM
hey phillygirl,i missed you there,now are you convinced that the superbowl wasnt renamed??yea,im 14 but it looks like i just schooled you in something about football,go back on your NFL history you dumbass

What are you talking about? The Super Bowl renamed? Who in the hell said that?

does "just before they got a pretty little name like the superbowl" ring a bell?

What exactly IS the Super Bowl?

Yup, you guessed it. THE NFL CHAMPIONSHIP GAME.
"Oh, yeah. They'll still boo. They have to. They're born to boo. Just now, they'll only boo with two Os instead of like four." - Larry Andersen

RandytheRaider

Quote from: PhillyGirl on September 20, 2005, 11:26:23 PM
Quote from: RandytheRaider on September 20, 2005, 11:23:45 PM
Quote from: PhillyGirl on September 20, 2005, 11:20:21 PM
Quote from: RandytheRaider on September 20, 2005, 11:18:40 PM
hey phillygirl,i missed you there,now are you convinced that the superbowl wasnt renamed??yea,im 14 but it looks like i just schooled you in something about football,go back on your NFL history you dumbass

What are you talking about? The Super Bowl renamed? Who in the hell said that?

does "just before they got a pretty little name like the superbowl" ring a bell?

What exactly IS the Super Bowl?

Yup, you guessed it. THE NFL CHAMPIONSHIP GAME.

you still dont get it..will someone explain to this dumbass??? look at the link i gave you,the AFL champ game and the NFL champ game were renamed into AFC champ game and NFC champ game they werent renamed into the superbowl or else there would be 2 superbowls  :-D

Sgt PSN

Quote from: PhillyGirl on September 20, 2005, 11:26:23 PM
Quote from: RandytheRaider on September 20, 2005, 11:23:45 PM
Quote from: PhillyGirl on September 20, 2005, 11:20:21 PM
Quote from: RandytheRaider on September 20, 2005, 11:18:40 PM
hey phillygirl,i missed you there,now are you convinced that the superbowl wasnt renamed??yea,im 14 but it looks like i just schooled you in something about football,go back on your NFL history you dumbass

What are you talking about? The Super Bowl renamed? Who in the hell said that?

does "just before they got a pretty little name like the superbowl" ring a bell?

What exactly IS the Super Bowl?

Yup, you guessed it. THE NFL CHAMPIONSHIP GAME.

Are you having fun talking to a wall? 

Phanatic

I'm guessing from the age of these guys that they don't really know what it's like to win a super bowl either. The past is for the geys....


Live in the now... You lose Sunday.
This post is brought to you by Alcohol!

PhillyGirl

Quote from: bo still knows on September 20, 2005, 11:25:43 PM

the rams are one of the most overrated teams in the nfl.  again you did it against a 49ers team that the starters would be 2nd and 3rd stringers on any other team in the nfl.

Agreed. Hey, I was there. I was bored shteinless watching it.  :-D  But regardless, you can't throw away what the Eagles have been able to do in the past few years win wise. No, they haven't won a recent title...that sucks. But the Raiders haven't either. The poster who needs his mouth washed out with soap by his mommy keeps talking about the Raiders winning it all...that was before he was even born! Recent years have been good to the Eagles. The seasons have been fantastic. Last year was a dream season and it ended miserably, but hell, I wouldn't have traded it for not making the playoffs at all!
"Oh, yeah. They'll still boo. They have to. They're born to boo. Just now, they'll only boo with two Os instead of like four." - Larry Andersen

Sgt PSN

Quote from: Phanatic on September 20, 2005, 11:28:24 PM
The past is for the geys....

.....because it's always behind you. 


HA!