players vs front office

Started by ice grillin you, August 07, 2005, 08:28:01 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

PhillyGirl

Quote from: bobbyinlondon on August 09, 2005, 09:16:57 AM
I wasn't sure either, until I re-read it, and then when he goes on to say he got the money he deserved. He definitely didn't think it was a low ball contract.  And I still haven't seen anyone who can tell most of us how Owens outperformed his deal. After all, he didn't establish any new career highs--his TDs and yardage were about his average and his catches were just below what he averaged in SF.

I agree with you completely. I'm just saying, it seemed in the book that his agent did all the finagling and just passed along the info to TO that the deal was a good one.

What I didn't read anywhere, though...was where the NFLPA told him to not sign it. When would they have had the time to do that?
"Oh, yeah. They'll still boo. They have to. They're born to boo. Just now, they'll only boo with two Os instead of like four." - Larry Andersen

ice grillin you

And I still haven't seen anyone who can tell most of us how Owens outperformed his deal. After all, he didn't establish any new career highs--his TDs and yardage were about his average and his catches were just below what he averaged in SF

i agree with you and believe TO to be one of the worst people on the planet...but to be fair outperforming a contract has nothing to do with career averages...it has to do with what he did last year compared to what hes getting paid this year and in comparison to other wr's stats and pay
i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

PhillyGirl

Quote from: ice grillin you on August 09, 2005, 09:24:05 AM
And I still haven't seen anyone who can tell most of us how Owens outperformed his deal. After all, he didn't establish any new career highs--his TDs and yardage were about his average and his catches were just below what he averaged in SF

i agree with you and believe TO to be one of the worst people on the planet..

Comments like this make you look like a complete jackass.

Worst people on the planet? So, he's among the murderers, rapists, drug dealers, kidnappers, etc?
"Oh, yeah. They'll still boo. They have to. They're born to boo. Just now, they'll only boo with two Os instead of like four." - Larry Andersen

ice grillin you

i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

PhillyGirl

"Oh, yeah. They'll still boo. They have to. They're born to boo. Just now, they'll only boo with two Os instead of like four." - Larry Andersen

bobbyinlondon

Quote from: PhillyGirl on August 09, 2005, 09:19:39 AM
Quote from: bobbyinlondon on August 09, 2005, 09:16:57 AM
I wasn't sure either, until I re-read it, and then when he goes on to say he got the money he deserved. He definitely didn't think it was a low ball contract.  And I still haven't seen anyone who can tell most of us how Owens outperformed his deal. After all, he didn't establish any new career highs--his TDs and yardage were about his average and his catches were just below what he averaged in SF.

I agree with you completely. I'm just saying, it seemed in the book that his agent did all the finagling and just passed along the info to TO that the deal was a good one.

What I didn't read anywhere, though...was where the NFLPA told him to not sign it. When would they have had the time to do that?


Agreed, I didn't see that part, either.

PoopyfaceMcGee

Quote from: ice grillin you on August 09, 2005, 09:24:05 AM
it has to do with what he did last year compared to what hes getting paid this year and in comparison to other wr's stats and pay

You can't look at a contract in a bubble.  T.O. made $10 million REAL MONEY last year.  He did not yet earn all that money, especially being injured throughout the playoffs and not being 100% for the Super Bowl.  Sure, he's "only" making $3.5 million this year, but at an average of $6.75-$7 million per season for his first two seasons, I'd say he's being compensated more than fairly.  There is a natural gap in his contract for next year because of the large roster bonus due, which would have been the perfect time for both sides to want to renegotiate.  All T.O. had to do was be T.O. for 2005, and he'd see his big paycheck from the Eagles or another team.  Easy money.

You don't have to be "on the nuts" of the Eagles' front office to realize that T.O. is absolutely being compensated fairly under his current contract and that giving him a new deal with more big dollars up-front in 2005 would have been far exceeding what he's earned on the field.

Seabiscuit36

If anyone remembers T.O. also didnt have to sign a waiver before he played in the SB which most teams would have to get them out of a contract if her was injured during the game.  The eagles instead decided to honor the contract and leave themself open to the salarycap for an injured player.  They did the right thing for T.O. and instead T.O. stabbed them in the back.  Either way he's here now and we are a better team with him than without him.  As long as he's healthy for the reg season im cool with him he just needs a better PR person
"For all the civic slurs, for all the unsavory things said of the Philadelphia fans, also say this: They could teach loyalty to a dog. Their capacity for pain is without limit." -Bill Lyons

ice grillin you

whoa!....chill dook....i agree with you...TO is a moron

i was simply pointing out that career averages have nothing to do with outperforming or not outperforming a contract

nothing less nothing more
i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

PoopyfaceMcGee

You're partially wrong, though.  Career averages are one of the many factors that determine a player's expected value to give him a new contract.  The contract that T.O. and the Eagles agreed on before the 2004 season was partially based on his previous production, in order to predict his production with the Eagles.  Expectations were high, and he met those expectations.  He absolutely, positively did NOT exceed those expectations.  Everything in a player's past playing career is, therefore, a factor.

ice grillin you

im not talking about getting a new contract...naturally what youve done previous to that determines its size...im talking about performance vs a current contract...what you did three years ago has no bearing on that
i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

Cerevant

Quote from: ice grillin you on August 09, 2005, 10:07:18 AM
im not talking about getting a new contract...naturally what youve done previous to that determines its size...im talking about performance vs a current contract...what you did three years ago has no bearing on that
But that's the point - his original contract was based on past performance, and a re-negotiation would be based on what happened last year.  If his performance in the last year demonstrated that his past performance was not indicitive of his value, then you could argue that the contract was not fair.  However, this past year was consistent with his previous performance - exactly what the Eagles expected when they made the original contract.

Again, the question is: what did he do to make himself more valuable a player than he was when he signed his original deal?

C
An ad hominem fallacy consists of asserting that someone's argument is wrong and/or he is wrong to argue at all purely because of something discreditable/not-authoritative about the person or those persons cited by him rather than addressing the soundness of the argument itself.

ice grillin you

Again, the question is: what did he do to make himself more valuable a player than he was when he signed his original deal?

absolutely nothing...no one said he did
i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

Larry

QuoteAgain, the question is: what did he do to make himself more valuable a player than he was when he signed his original deal?

He didn't do anything, but there's more to it than that.

In a nutshell, the one event which spurred Owens to seek more money is this:  Marvin Harrison's contract extension.

It's a simple capitalistic principle--if you're working at a particular occupation and someone in the same field suddenly receives a large raise which exceeds your pay, naturally you're going to ask for more money, especially if you believe you're more talented than that person.

Owens most likely thinks he's more valuable than Harrison, but now, Harrison makes a whole lot more money.  That's gotta stick in TO's craw.

Same for Westbrook when compared to Jordan...that's why he's using Jordan's contract as a starting point.  He believes he's more valuable than him.
More Mahe please.

MURP

and Lamont Jordan basically had to sit around 4 years playing 2nd fiddle up in NY before he got his big deal.