Fatal-Combat Discussion

Started by Diomedes, February 21, 2008, 07:43:41 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Cerevant

Quote from: Phanatic on February 25, 2008, 01:48:06 PM
Quote from: Cerevant on February 25, 2008, 01:45:47 PM
Do none of you work?  Not that I'm actually working, but I think playing an online game might raise some eyebrows...

Multi Tasking!!

So, it isn't real-time?
An ad hominem fallacy consists of asserting that someone's argument is wrong and/or he is wrong to argue at all purely because of something discreditable/not-authoritative about the person or those persons cited by him rather than addressing the soundness of the argument itself.

Phanatic

Quote from: Cerevant on February 25, 2008, 02:05:42 PM
Quote from: Phanatic on February 25, 2008, 01:48:06 PM
Quote from: Cerevant on February 25, 2008, 01:45:47 PM
Do none of you work?  Not that I'm actually working, but I think playing an online game might raise some eyebrows...

Multi Tasking!!

So, it isn't real-time?

No not really. It's a browser based statistical based type of game.
This post is brought to you by Alcohol!

PoopyfaceMcGee

Quote from: Phanatic on February 25, 2008, 02:04:59 PM
So if you leave them they don't go to the hospital. I see.

I only have Used Kevlar and could use bullet proof I think...

They still go, but not for as long, and you get some EXP.

BPV on the way.

Phanatic

This post is brought to you by Alcohol!

Cerevant

You guys suck.  I'm going to get fired.

So, can a newb get a hook up while he's sitting in the hospital?
An ad hominem fallacy consists of asserting that someone's argument is wrong and/or he is wrong to argue at all purely because of something discreditable/not-authoritative about the person or those persons cited by him rather than addressing the soundness of the argument itself.

PoopyfaceMcGee

Ok, I sent it, but I had to log on via work PC instead of BlackBerry to do it.

So, in the future, I'll just send extra items to SunMo (as I have with the other BPV, the PP7, and the rifle), and he can either dole out to lower gang members or sell for the gang's profit.

Phanatic

Quote from: Cerevant on February 25, 2008, 02:22:13 PM
You guys suck.  I'm going to get fired.

So, can a newb get a hook up while he's sitting in the hospital?


Use some weed to get healthy and get out. Let me know if you need some.
This post is brought to you by Alcohol!

Cerevant

I'm out - it was only 5 minutes.  Guess I need to go shopping.

Still figuring out what I'm supposed to do.
An ad hominem fallacy consists of asserting that someone's argument is wrong and/or he is wrong to argue at all purely because of something discreditable/not-authoritative about the person or those persons cited by him rather than addressing the soundness of the argument itself.

Sgt PSN

#1028
That farger kingzblend waits until I get offline before he attacks me.  I keep putting his spouse in the hospital. 

I may just eat the $14 and buy the Will pack that comes with 4 potions, $200,000 and 200 hundred crystals and immediately bump myself up to level 10 and go back to beating on him like I was yesterday. 

PoopyfaceMcGee

Quote from: Cerevant on February 25, 2008, 02:26:58 PM
I'm out - it was only 5 minutes.  Guess I need to go shopping.

Still figuring out what I'm supposed to do.

Since no one else seems to be jumping on my old rifle or PP7, SunMo might be willing to send you a sweet gun for a n00b.

Cerevant

I did sign up with your link Sunny...hook a Souderton brotha up?
An ad hominem fallacy consists of asserting that someone's argument is wrong and/or he is wrong to argue at all purely because of something discreditable/not-authoritative about the person or those persons cited by him rather than addressing the soundness of the argument itself.

Sgt PSN


SunMo

Quote from: Cerevant on February 25, 2008, 02:30:07 PM
I did sign up with your link Sunny...hook a Souderton brotha up?

i sent you the PP7 and bullet proof vest, enjoy
I'm the Anti-Christ. You got me in a vendetta kind of mood.

Cerevant

An ad hominem fallacy consists of asserting that someone's argument is wrong and/or he is wrong to argue at all purely because of something discreditable/not-authoritative about the person or those persons cited by him rather than addressing the soundness of the argument itself.

PoopyfaceMcGee

My stats are getting kind of decent, I guess.