The coming financial crisis

Started by Butchers Bill, August 09, 2007, 05:05:33 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

rjs246

Quote from: reese125 on January 21, 2008, 04:17:38 PM
The biggest band-aid wont help the real problem, but Ill take the refund check anyhow

Bingo.
Is rjs gonna have to choke a bitch?

Let them eat bootstraps.

Diomedes

Me too.  And if Monkeyman Bush thinks I'm going to blow it at Wal Mart he's out of his AIDS soaked mind.  It goes to debt or savings.
There is considerable overlap between the intelligence of the smartest bears and the dumbest tourists." - Yosemite Park Ranger

phillymic2000

Quote from: Diomedes on January 21, 2008, 06:04:48 PM
Me too.  And if Monkeyman Bush thinks I'm going to blow it at Wal Mart he's out of his AIDS soaked mind.  It goes to debt or savings.

Damn right

PoopyfaceMcGee


Seabiscuit36

feds drop interest 3/4 of a point, and the futures opened down -523.  ARMEGEDDON
"For all the civic slurs, for all the unsavory things said of the Philadelphia fans, also say this: They could teach loyalty to a dog. Their capacity for pain is without limit." -Bill Lyons

Susquehanna Birder

The Fed move was to stave off distaster. Hang in there...things will improve today. Hell, things might even finish in the green.

rjs246

Cutting interest rates was (part of) what led the country into this mortgage/debt nonsense problem in the first place. Not poo-pooing the cut, just pointing out that we want to make sure we've actually learned from our mistakes. Also, maybe a new solution to the problem, rather than recycled ideas to 'stave off' distaster would be refreshing.
Is rjs gonna have to choke a bitch?

Let them eat bootstraps.

Cerevant

Yep.  Lowering interest rates stimulates the economy by encouraging more debt.  That sucking sound you hear is the US dollar circling the drain.
An ad hominem fallacy consists of asserting that someone's argument is wrong and/or he is wrong to argue at all purely because of something discreditable/not-authoritative about the person or those persons cited by him rather than addressing the soundness of the argument itself.

PoopyfaceMcGee

Quote from: Cerevant on January 22, 2008, 12:36:27 PM
Yep.  Lowering interest rates stimulates the economy by encouraging more debt.  That sucking sound you hear is the US dollar circling the drain.

Are we still equal with the loonie?

Cerevant

Yep.  The loonie would have pulled ahead and kept going, but that would kill the economy up here...
Bloomberg
QuoteThe Bank of Canada, in a scheduled meeting, lowered its main interest rate by a quarter point today to 4 percent and signaled it will act again to shield Canada from the U.S. slowdown. The Bank of England said it has no plans to change the date of its next rate decision. The bank's policy makers are due to begin a two-day meeting in London on Feb. 7.
An ad hominem fallacy consists of asserting that someone's argument is wrong and/or he is wrong to argue at all purely because of something discreditable/not-authoritative about the person or those persons cited by him rather than addressing the soundness of the argument itself.

PoopyfaceMcGee

"Stimulus Package"

Sounds hot.

I won't get a dime, and shouldn't, so it must be fair.

Diomedes

Here's how the deal works out, according to the AP via NYTimes:

QuoteHow the Rebate Works
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

Filed at 8:41 p.m. ET

How Americans in different financial situations would fare under the rebate plan proposed by House leaders and the White House.

--An individual with $2,500 in earned income in 2007: Disqualified because income fell below the $3,000 threshold. No rebate.

--A married couple with no children, with adjusted gross income of $100,000 in 2007: Would qualify for the full $1,200 couples. A $1,200 rebate.

--A worker with one child, who earned $9,000 and owed no taxes in 2007: Would qualify for the $300 rebate available to individuals who pay no taxes but earned at least $3,000, plus an additional $300 for the child. A $600 rebate.

--A couple with income of $145,000 in 2007, with three children: Would qualify for the full $1,200 for couples, plus $300 for each child. A $2,100 rebate.

--A couple with income of $160,000 in 2007 with two children: Would qualify for a partial rebate, reduced by 5 percent for every $1,000 in income above the $150,000 threshold. An $1,800 rebate -- $1,200 for the couple plus $300 per child -- would go down by 50 percent for this family. A $900 rebate.

--A couple with income of $200,000 and four children: Disqualified because their income exceeded $174,000, the phase-out limit. No rebate.

--An individual with adjusted gross income of $23,000 and no dependents would get a rebate of $600.

--A couple with adjusted gross income of $160,000 and two children would get a rebate of $1,300.

--A couple with adjusted gross income of $184,000 and two children would get a $100 rebate.
There is considerable overlap between the intelligence of the smartest bears and the dumbest tourists." - Yosemite Park Ranger

reese125


ice grillin you

i dont know why but im getting $600...kind of embarrassing really...i will be donating mine...this really is what it says it is a stimulus package for bushs pathetic economy not really to help people out
i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

Diomedes

whatever I get, is going half to debt and half to savings

let the people who live in McMansions spend this welfare check on teevees and ottomans
There is considerable overlap between the intelligence of the smartest bears and the dumbest tourists." - Yosemite Park Ranger