Westy overpaid.. ouch

Started by sammyeaglesfan, April 14, 2007, 09:38:09 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Diomedes

Lurie ain't gonna take a million plus hit, nor should he.

No one is going to let the IRS have an extra million plus.  Nor should he.

The IRS wouldn't keep an overpayment of a million plus...there are laws about that.

vigy, you're out to lunch.  bring me back some fries with mayo on the side.
There is considerable overlap between the intelligence of the smartest bears and the dumbest tourists." - Yosemite Park Ranger

ice grillin you

if the irs wont keep it then no problem...just let them return it

and if lurie wants it back before then he can pay one of his accountants to file the necessary paperwork on westbrooks behalf

try to keep up dunn
i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

Rome

I don't know what the situation is exactly but if they're withholding checks from him because of an accounting error that they made, that's a farged up thing right there.


ice grillin you

yeah thats all im saying


unless they are garnishing his funds as a way of him paying the money the owes back...but if they are putting economic sanctions on him then that is indeed farged up
i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

Beermonkey

Quote from: Jerome99RIP on October 19, 2007, 10:13:25 AM
I don't know what the situation is exactly but if they're withholding checks from him because of an accounting error that they made, that's a farged up thing right there.

If your employer overpaid you commissions, how would they get the money back from you?

PoopyfaceMcGee

Quote from: ice grillin you on October 19, 2007, 10:18:01 AM
they are garnishing his funds as a way of him paying the money the owes back

That is correct.

SunMo

Quote from: FastFreddie on October 19, 2007, 10:25:15 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on October 19, 2007, 10:18:01 AM
they are garnishing his funds as a way of him paying the money the owes back

That is correct.

no it isn't, they are flat out not paying him
I'm the Anti-Christ. You got me in a vendetta kind of mood.

ice grillin you

That is correct.


you have a link for that...because everything ive read has said that they arent paying him to force him to pay the money back because he didnt accept their terms on a payback plan
i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

Beermonkey

#68
Quote from: SunMo on October 19, 2007, 10:27:58 AM
Quote from: FastFreddie on October 19, 2007, 10:25:15 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on October 19, 2007, 10:18:01 AM
they are garnishing his funds as a way of him paying the money the owes back

That is correct.

no it isn't, they are flat out not paying him

I would be very surprised if that was the truth. I would think that would be in violation of his contract, the agreement with the NFLPA as well as federal labor laws.

The Eagles have every right to dock his paycheck for money owed back.

QuoteThe mistake was publicly revealed in April, and a league source confirmed yesterday that the matter was unresolved and that the Eagles were withholding Westbrook's weekly paycheck until the sides reach a signed agreement on how it should be resolved.

I saw this part of the article but it's not clear if the withheld money is being applied to the outstanding amount or not.


SunMo

http://www.philly.com/philly/sports/eagles/20071018_Birds__Westbrook_still_at_odds_over_extra_money.html

QuoteThe mistake was publicly revealed in April, and a league source confirmed yesterday that the matter was unresolved and that the Eagles were withholding Westbrook's weekly paycheck until the sides reach a signed agreement on how it should be resolved.
I'm the Anti-Christ. You got me in a vendetta kind of mood.

ice grillin you

I would be very surprised if that was the truth. I would think that would be in violation of his contract, the agreement with the NFLPA as well as federal labor laws.

the nflpa thinks it is...as of a few days ago they were on the verge of filing a grievance with the league over the withholidng of his checks


i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

Wingspan

Quote from: ice grillin you on October 19, 2007, 10:18:01 AM
yeah thats all im saying


unless they are garnishing his funds as a way of him paying the money the owes back...but if they are putting economic sanctions on him then that is indeed farged up

Every article written says that is exactly the what they are doing.

lolol @ "economic sanctions"
Connection Problems

Sorry, SMF was unable to connect to the database. This may be caused by the server being busy. Please try again later.

SunMo

Quote from: Wingspan on October 19, 2007, 10:38:33 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on October 19, 2007, 10:18:01 AM
yeah thats all im saying


unless they are garnishing his funds as a way of him paying the money the owes back...but if they are putting economic sanctions on him then that is indeed farged up

Every article written says that is exactly the what they are doing.

lolol @ "economic sanctions"

wrong...again
I'm the Anti-Christ. You got me in a vendetta kind of mood.

ice grillin you

Every article written says that is exactly the what they are doing.

im not denying this i was just asking for all the links cause ive yet to see it anywhere
i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

Beermonkey

Quote from: SunMo on October 19, 2007, 10:37:33 AM
http://www.philly.com/philly/sports/eagles/20071018_Birds__Westbrook_still_at_odds_over_extra_money.html

QuoteThe mistake was publicly revealed in April, and a league source confirmed yesterday that the matter was unresolved and that the Eagles were withholding Westbrook's weekly paycheck until the sides reach a signed agreement on how it should be resolved.

I edited my post before I saw your's. It says nothing about whether what is withheld is being applied to the owed amount or not, which is the issue. If it's being applied, that's within their rights. If it's not, thats odd.