Political Hippo Circle Jerk - America, farg YEAH!

Started by PoopyfaceMcGee, December 11, 2006, 01:30:30 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

rjs246

Sorry, I thought Al Gore was my Jesus. It's hard to keep up around here.
Is rjs gonna have to choke a bitch?

Let them eat bootstraps.

hbionic

I said watch the game and you will see my spirit manifest.-ILLEAGLE 02/04/05


ice grillin you

Quote from: rjs246 on May 25, 2012, 09:42:59 AM
My thoughts are that consenting adults should be able to love, marry, live with or farg whoever they want and that the government shouldn't be in the business of approving or disapproving of anyone's relationships gay or straight.

I also think that people who base their likes/dislikes/political leanings/decisions of any sort on a book that was written 1900 years ago are farged in the head. I don't begrudge people their superstitions, I've been a poker player athlete and sports fan my whole life so I have plenty of my own superstitions, and faith in a higher power is fine in my book but the harm that organized religion does to rational discourse in this country and around the world is mountainous.

So when an organization bucks a trend of stupidity and does something right and rational in the face of ass-backwards tradition I am all for it. Good for the President and good for the NAACP.

Quote from: rjs246 on May 25, 2012, 07:49:28 AM
Another stellar back and forth, you two.


either be a hippo or dont...but dont try and mock people like you are somehow a genius then repeat what someone has said for five or six years in this thread....its not a good look
i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

rjs246

The difference, of course, is that I posted my thoughts and didn't get involved in a childish back and forth where we call each other names and generally behave like hippos. But you knew that.
Is rjs gonna have to choke a bitch?

Let them eat bootstraps.

SD


Rome

Quote
May 27, 2012
Big Fiscal Phonies
By PAUL KRUGMAN

Quick quiz: What's a good five-letter description of Chris Christie, the Republican governor of New Jersey, that ends in "y"?

The obvious choice is, of course, "bully." But as a recent debate over the state's budget reveals, "phony" is an equally valid answer. And as Mr. Christie goes, so goes his party.

Until now the attack of the fiscal phonies has been mainly a national rather than a state issue, with Paul Ryan, the chairman of the House Budget Committee, as the prime example. As regular readers of this column know, Mr. Ryan has somehow acquired a reputation as a stern fiscal hawk despite offering budget proposals that, far from being focused on deficit reduction, are mainly about cutting taxes for the rich while slashing aid to the poor and unlucky. In fact, once you strip out Mr. Ryan's "magic asterisks" — claims that he will somehow increase revenues and cut spending in ways that he refuses to specify — what you're left with are plans that would increase, not reduce, federal debt.

The same can be said of Mitt Romney, who claims that he will balance the budget but whose actual proposals consist mainly of huge tax cuts (for corporations and the wealthy, of course) plus a promise not to cut defense spending.

Both Mr. Ryan and Mr. Romney, then, are fake deficit hawks. And the evidence for their fakery isn't just their bad arithmetic; it's the fact that for all their alleged deep concern over budget gaps, that concern isn't sufficient to induce them to give up anything — anything at all — that they and their financial backers want. They're willing to snatch food from the mouths of babes (literally, via cuts in crucial nutritional aid programs), but that's a positive from their point of view — the social safety net, says Mr. Ryan, should not become "a hammock that lulls able-bodied people to lives of dependency and complacency." Maintaining low taxes on profits and capital gains, and indeed cutting those taxes further, are, however, sacrosanct.

Still, Mr. Ryan and Mr. Romney are playing to a national audience. Are Republican governors, who have to deal with real budget constraints, different? Well, there have been many claims to that effect; Mr. Christie, in particular, has been widely held up, not least by himself, as an example of a politician willing to make tough choices.

But last week we got to see him facing an actual tough choice — and aside from the yelling-at-people thing, he proved himself just another standard fiscal phony.

Here's the story: For some time now Mr. Christie has been touting what he calls the "Jersey comeback." Even before his latest outburst, it was hard to see what he was talking about: yes, there have been some job gains in the McMansion State since Mr. Christie took office, but they have lagged gains both in the nation as a whole and in New York and Connecticut, the obvious points of comparison.

Yet Mr. Christie has been adamant that New Jersey is on the way back, and that this makes room for, you guessed it, tax cuts that would disproportionately benefit the wealthy.

Last week reality hit: David Rosen, the state's independent, nonpartisan budget analyst, told legislators that the state faces a $1.3 billion shortfall. How did the governor respond?

First, by attacking the messenger. According to Mr. Christie, Mr. Rosen — a veteran public servant whose office usually makes more accurate budget forecasts than the state's governor — is "the Dr. Kevorkian of the numbers." Civility!

By the way, even Mr. Christie's own officials are predicting a major budget shortfall, just not quite as big. And the two big credit-rating agencies, Moody's and Standard & Poor's, have recently issued warnings about New Jersey's budget situation, which S.& P. called "structurally unbalanced" because of the governor's optimistic revenue assumptions.

New Jersey, then, is still in dire fiscal shape. So is our tough-talking governor willing to reconsider his pet tax cut? Fuhgeddaboudit. Instead, he wants to fill the hole with one-shot budget gimmicks, including reneging on a promise to reduce borrowing for transportation investment and diverting funds from clean-energy programs. So much for fiscal responsibility.

Will Mr. Christie's budget temper tantrum end speculation that he might become Mr. Romney's running mate? I have no idea. But it really doesn't matter: whoever Mr. Romney picks, he or she will cheerfully go along with the budget-busting, reverse Robin Hood policies that you know are coming if the former governor wins.

For the modern American right doesn't care about deficits, and never did. All that talk about debt was just an excuse for attacking Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security and food stamps. And as for Mr. Christie, well, he's just another fiscal phony, distinguished only by his fondness for invective.

MDS

Zero hour, Michael. It's the end of the line. I'm the firstborn. I'm sick of playing second fiddle. I'm always third in line for everything. I'm tired of finishing fourth. Being the fifth wheel. There are six things I'm mad about, and I'm taking over.

SD

Quote from: MDS on May 30, 2012, 06:41:06 PM
http://gawker.com/5914388/fox-news-is-now-producing-its-own-anti+obama-attack-ads

Least surprising thing ever. I forgot how thriving the economy was when their conservative choice was in office.

Now let's make a video of Bush after the Clinton years and see how that stacks up

MDS

management blamed it on the associate producer and said they had nothing to do with it

and now that that little mess is cleared up, i can back to watching some fair and balanced news coverage
Zero hour, Michael. It's the end of the line. I'm the firstborn. I'm sick of playing second fiddle. I'm always third in line for everything. I'm tired of finishing fourth. Being the fifth wheel. There are six things I'm mad about, and I'm taking over.

Munson

Stewart took it to Fox/Roger Ailes a little bit last night....

QuoteOh, Jon! Did I ever tell you that I, Roger Ailes, plan to undermine the role of an independent press by constantly whining at any reportage that deviates from a staunch conservative narrative is biased, while at the same time filling the editorial vacuum that that creates by building a Conservative propaganda juggernaut in the guise of a news organization... Jon, I'm gonna call the organization Fox News, and its tagline will be -- you're gonna love this: 'A Fanatically Micro-Managed Media Fiefdom Where My Own Far-Right Agenda And Personal Sense of Victomhood Drive Every Aspect of the Operation... and Balanced.'
Quote from: ice grillin you on April 01, 2008, 05:10:48 PM
perhaps you could explain sd's reasons for "disliking" it as well since you seem to be so in tune with other peoples minds

PhillyPhreak54

Quote from: MDS on May 30, 2012, 07:32:41 PM
management blamed it on the associate producer and said they had nothing to do with it

and now that that little mess is cleared up, i can back to watching some fair and balanced news coverage

Predictable.


Sgt PSN


Tomahawk

Quote from: Sgt PSN on May 31, 2012, 01:00:50 PM
Amercia, Farg Yeah!

QuoteBut one of the slogans reads, "A Better Amercia." Oops. Somebody didn't observe the "I-before-C" rule

That was dumb...it's almost as if the line was writen by Sarge.

Rome

haha... sagre is gonna start kicking some ass up in this piece.

Sgt PSN