From the producers of "The Smoking Ban," bring you "The Food Ban"

Started by Wingspan, December 06, 2006, 01:26:25 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Diomedes

There is considerable overlap between the intelligence of the smartest bears and the dumbest tourists." - Yosemite Park Ranger

Diomedes

transfats are poison.  they ought to be banned in food just like arsenic. 

There is considerable overlap between the intelligence of the smartest bears and the dumbest tourists." - Yosemite Park Ranger

PoopyfaceMcGee

The Dio/IGY/Cerevant circle jerk really is an unstoppable force.  I guess we all have to be Socialist Athiests, then.

Just goose step in line, and check your opinions at the door.


I don't eat trans fats, nor would I.  But then they should be banned at a higher level than restaurants.  I suppose the harmful effects of cigarettes on your lungs and marijuana on your brain should then be ignored, though.

hunt

now that we're back on the transfats topic....i watched the first hour of "supersize me" last night.  the guy went a little overboard..maybe a lot...like when he vomited while trying to finish off one of his value meals...but it seemed like an interesting concept.
i missed the last hour because "rome" was on...could someone who's seen the whole movie fill me on on the last hour???  just wondering how much his health deteriated after the 30 days.
lemonade was a popular drink and it still is

Diomedes

Quote from: FFatPatt on January 29, 2007, 11:14:13 AMI don't eat trans fats, nor would I.

We all eat transfats..they're practically unavoidable.  Do you eat anything pre-packaged?  Oreos?  Doritos?  Anything that has partially hydrogenated vegetable oil, which is a lot of stuff, is trans fat.

Your body simply can't process the stuff.  Instead, it goes directly to your arterial walls and attaches there for, effectively, ever.  It's poison.
There is considerable overlap between the intelligence of the smartest bears and the dumbest tourists." - Yosemite Park Ranger

Diomedes

echo...echo...

effing server
There is considerable overlap between the intelligence of the smartest bears and the dumbest tourists." - Yosemite Park Ranger

PoopyfaceMcGee

Quote from: hunt on January 29, 2007, 11:15:02 AM
could someone who's seen the whole movie fill me on on the last hour???  just wondering how much his health deteriated after the 30 days.

It was a trainwreck.  I own "Super Size Me" and watch it at times to curb cravings for fast food.

Quote from: Diomedes on January 29, 2007, 11:17:49 AM
Quote from: FFatPatt on January 29, 2007, 11:14:13 AMI don't eat trans fats, nor would I.

We all eat transfats..they're practically unavoidable.  Do you eat anything pre-packaged?  Oreos?  Doritos?  Anything that has partially hydrogenated vegetable oil, which is a lot of stuff, is trans fat.

Your body simply can't process the stuff.  Instead, it goes directly to your arterial walls and attaches there for, effectively, ever.  It's poison.

I eat pre-packaged food, but only that without partially-hydrogenated oils.  More and more of those foods are changing their formulas to voluntarily remove the trans fat.

Arguing with me or trying to educate me about trans fat is a waste of time.  I know how bad they are, I know exactly why they're bad, and that's why I refuse to eat them.  Frankly, I think they should be simply banned by the FDA.

Banning them at the restaurant level is pointless and avoids the real widespread issue.

ice grillin you

i think the point of doing it at the restaurant level is so that people can be sure of what they are getting...in a grocery stores you have the option of seeing the ingrediants that youre going to be eating not so on a restaurant menu


that said i agree they should be banned oputright
i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

Cerevant

Quote from: ice grillin you on January 29, 2007, 11:26:43 AM
i think the point of doing it at the restaurant level is so that people can be sure of what they are getting...in a grocery stores you have the option of seeing the ingrediants that youre going to be eating not so on a restaurant menu


that said i agree they should be banned oputright

Agree.

An ad hominem fallacy consists of asserting that someone's argument is wrong and/or he is wrong to argue at all purely because of something discreditable/not-authoritative about the person or those persons cited by him rather than addressing the soundness of the argument itself.

Diomedes

Quote from: ice grillin you on January 29, 2007, 11:26:43 AM...in a grocery stores you have the option of seeing the ingrediants that youre going to be eating

only thanks to the massive, out of control, evil liberal government...food companies fight tooth and nail to avoid listing ingredients
There is considerable overlap between the intelligence of the smartest bears and the dumbest tourists." - Yosemite Park Ranger

hunt

Quote from: Diomedes on January 29, 2007, 11:39:24 AM
Quote from: ice grillin you on January 29, 2007, 11:26:43 AM...in a grocery stores you have the option of seeing the ingrediants that youre going to be eating

only thanks to the massive, out of control, evil liberal government...food companies fight tooth and nail to avoid listing ingredients

yeah...they still try to get around it.  my package of chewy chips ahoy cookies listed 0g of transfat on the box but listed hydrogenated soybean oil in the ingredients list.  well, which is it???
anyway, i ate 7 cookies.
lemonade was a popular drink and it still is

Cerevant

Quote from: hunt on January 29, 2007, 11:42:12 AM
yeah...they still try to get around it.  my package of chewy chips ahoy cookies listed 0g of transfat on the box but listed hydrogenated soybean oil in the ingredients list.  well, which is it???
anyway, i ate 7 cookies.
Two possible reasons:
  • The US allows the 0% label when there is less than 0.5g / serving (but how much is a serving?)
  • Trans fats are partially hydrogenated - I'm still trying to find out if fully hydrogenated fats have the same issues...
An ad hominem fallacy consists of asserting that someone's argument is wrong and/or he is wrong to argue at all purely because of something discreditable/not-authoritative about the person or those persons cited by him rather than addressing the soundness of the argument itself.

Rome


PoopyfaceMcGee

Quote from: Cerevant on January 29, 2007, 11:47:23 AM
Quote from: hunt on January 29, 2007, 11:42:12 AM
yeah...they still try to get around it.  my package of chewy chips ahoy cookies listed 0g of transfat on the box but listed hydrogenated soybean oil in the ingredients list.  well, which is it???
anyway, i ate 7 cookies.
Two possible reasons:
  • The US allows the 0% label when there is less than 0.5g / serving (but how much is a serving?)
  • Trans fats are partially hydrogenated - I'm still trying to find out if fully hydrogenated fats have the same issues...

QuotePartially hydrogenated oils are thought to be far more dangerous than those that have been fully hydrogenated, because not all of the trans fats are converted into saturated fat during the process. Fully hydrogenated oil is essentially saturated fat, and the health risks are the same.

And as for your other comment, yes - they're allowed to round to an extent.  I'm not sure if it's under 0.5 or less, but very many foods read "0g Trans Fat" which is different than simply "NO Trans Fat".  Still, being able to put that on the package is progress for many junk foods.

Cerevant

Quote from: FFatPatt on January 29, 2007, 12:04:07 PM
QuotePartially hydrogenated oils are thought to be far more dangerous than those that have been fully hydrogenated, because not all of the trans fats are converted into saturated fat during the process. Fully hydrogenated oil is essentially saturated fat, and the health risks are the same.

Thanks - I've noticed that more and more products have fully hydrogenated fats, and was wondering if that was why.

QuoteAnd as for your other comment, yes - they're allowed to round to an extent.  I'm not sure if it's under 0.5 or less, but very many foods read "0g Trans Fat" which is different than simply "NO Trans Fat".  Still, being able to put that on the package is progress for many junk foods.

From Wikipedia:
QuoteOn July 11, 2003, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a regulation[44] requiring manufacturers to list trans fat on the Nutrition Facts panel of foods and some dietary supplements.[45] The new labeling rule allowed for immediate voluntary compliance with mandatory compliance by January 1, 2006 (although companies may petition for an extension to January 1, 2008). The regulation allows trans fat levels of less than 0.5 grams per serving to be labeled as 0 grams per serving.
An ad hominem fallacy consists of asserting that someone's argument is wrong and/or he is wrong to argue at all purely because of something discreditable/not-authoritative about the person or those persons cited by him rather than addressing the soundness of the argument itself.