The Running Backs, Wide Receivers and other offensive questionmarks...

Drunkmasterflex · August 21, 2006, 07:58:35 PM

Quote from: rjs246 on August 21, 2006, 07:06:19 PM
Shhh, don't say his name. They don't have a legitimate response for his ridiculous level of superiority over McNabb.

Brady? Why would anybody try?

My only thing is he has had one normal season with a legitimate WR and look how good he was. All of those players that IGY has mentioned have always had at least one their whole NFL career.

PoopyfaceMcGee · August 21, 2006, 08:02:50 PM

I plan to pick McNabb #3 overall in my FFL draft on Saturday! that is incredibly accurate!

General_Failure · August 21, 2006, 08:08:25 PM

Quote from: ice grillin you on August 21, 2006, 07:20:15 PM
brady wins more because belichek is light years ahead of reid as a coach but as far as how good of a player each is you could argue that mcnabb has/had the advantage in terms of coaching as he has played for an offensive mind where as brady has played for a defensive guru

The blatant disregard for simple grammar and punctuation around here lately is disturbing. Jesus Christ, are you all 12 year old girls typing this shtein out on your phones?

rjs246 · August 21, 2006, 08:12:56 PM

Internet slang and shorthand is very high on my long list of pet peeves.

mpmcgraw · August 21, 2006, 08:17:14 PM

Quote from: rjs246 on August 21, 2006, 08:12:56 PM
Internet slang and shorthand is very high on my long list of pet peeves.

RUMCYMHMD

reese125 · August 21, 2006, 08:46:58 PM

Quote from: FFatPatt on August 21, 2006, 06:16:57 PM
Brunell will not have a better year than McNabb unless there is another freak injury.

Yes, I'm even considering the surrounding cast.

I disagree with this statement. Brunell will have a better year than last. and from a statistical standpoint as well. If you cant see that they added talent to make the QB better (which is so needed for McNabb right now), than your blind. Just relying on the fact Brunell is "old" is an awful way at looking at it

Brunell is not just going to fall off the face of the earth and decide to throw 4 int's a game. He did extremely well for many weeks until their game plan became so predictable down the stretch, defenses were blanketing their only threats in Moss and Cooley--with an occasional Portis out on the dump. Hes a veteran who is older but will be wiser with more talent around him.

They are not the "best" receivers like IGY predicts, but they will conttribute in a big way. I hope they shtein the bed in a big way, but Im also not blinded by the fact he has better talent this year, and the defense will only give the O better field position to score easier with this talent.

People hare hating just to hate--face it, they have a good team

shorebird · August 21, 2006, 08:48:30 PM

Quote from: ice grillin you on August 20, 2006, 06:02:21 PM
All I know is that, for my money, Baskett, LJ, and Brown are already better than Thrash and Pinkston. LJ looks real good to me this pre-season
pinkston not hurt = brown right now if not beter than

Jesus Christ, you can't be that farging dumb.

This thread has become pointless. Everyone who thinks the Eagles have no chance to beat the Giants and Skins are football geniuses, and everyone who thinks that the Eagles have a chance to win are stupid homers.

rjs246 · August 21, 2006, 08:49:30 PM

Brown has not proven that he can do anything. Why is that so difficult for you people to comprehend?

PoopyfaceMcGee · August 21, 2006, 08:51:38 PM

I don't understand how Reggie Brown could have any less than 1700 yards and 13 TD's. It's unpossible. Go Birds.

shorebird · August 21, 2006, 08:52:49 PM

And just what the farg has Pinkston proved he can do besides drop passes, and punk out when he's called on to go over the middle? He's done, he should be cut.

Brown on the other hand has an upside.

Geowhizzer · August 21, 2006, 08:53:21 PM

Quote from: FFatPatt on August 21, 2006, 08:51:38 PM
I don't understand how Reggie Brown could have any less than 1700 yards and 13 TD's. It's unpossible. Go Birds.

UR A H8R! 3000 YRD N 40 TDS!

mpmcgraw · August 21, 2006, 08:54:14 PM

Optimism is bad mmmm-kay?

Christ, it is just so unreasonable to think that Reggie Brown will improve with another year in the offense and with more games with McNabb as the QB instead of McMahon.

reese125 · August 21, 2006, 08:57:08 PM

Quote from: shorebird on August 21, 2006, 08:52:49 PM
And just what the farg has Pinkston proved he can do besides drop passes, and punk out when he's called on to go over the middle? He's done, he should be cut.

Brown on the other hand has an upside.

sure he does, and so did Greg Lewis. Doesnt scare you at all that a 2nd yr receiver cant even get open in the preseason? You think their hiding their secret plays for Brown?

rjs246 · August 21, 2006, 08:57:41 PM

Quote from: shorebird on August 21, 2006, 08:52:49 PM
And just what the farg has Pinkston proved he can do besides drop passes, and punk out when he's called on to go over the middle? He's done, he should be cut.

Brown on the other hand has an upside.

He's proven that when he was healthy he could accumulate between 600 and 800 yards per season.

Once Brown gains more yards than he did with more TDs then I will be happy to admit that he is better than Pinkston was, but until that happens, Pinkston (when healthy, as IGY was pointing out) was better. This isn't rocket science.

mpmcgraw · August 21, 2006, 08:59:37 PM

Quote from: reese125 on August 21, 2006, 08:57:08 PM
Quote from: shorebird on August 21, 2006, 08:52:49 PM
And just what the farg has Pinkston proved he can do besides drop passes, and punk out when he's called on to go over the middle? He's done, he should be cut.

Brown on the other hand has an upside.

sure he does, and so did Greg Lewis. Doesnt scare you at all that a 2nd yr receiver cant even get open in the preseason? You think their hiding their secret plays for Brown?

Really you think Lewis had upside? I always thought he was a #4 reciever at best.