Hank Baskett Hysteria

[General_Failure]

From what little we've seen so far, he's at least the new Pinkston. Anything other than that is an added bonus.

[Rome]

He sucks and will never amount to anything.

End of thread.

[PoopyfaceMcGee]

We need an "Ask Hank Baskett" subforum on , just as soon as server reliability improves.

[Diomedes]

If he can be as effective as Pink was, I'd be very happy with him.  Reid would likely think he's a #2 for being that good, which is a worry, but a nice one to have because it assumes big value in a young player.

[General_Failure]

He sucks and will never amount to anything.

That's what I said. The new Pinkston.

[Rome]

We need an "Ask Hank Baskett" subforum on , just as soon as server reliability improves.

Sort of a Hank Baskett "basket" if you will...

[Rome]

He sucks and will never amount to anything.

That's what I said. The new Pinkston.

I was replying to Dio, not you, G_F.

And if his production matches Pinky's at Pinky's best, then yeah, I'll be happy with it this year.

[Rome]

Pinky in 2002 had 60 catches for almost 800 yards and 7 touchdowns.

Who wouldn't be satisfied with that from Hank?

[General_Failure]

IGY, but you knew that.

[Diomedes]

He knows who you were talking to, idiot.  And if his production only ever matches Pink's best, that's fine and he should be kept.

[PoopyfaceMcGee]

Pinky in 2002 had 60 catches for almost 800 yards and 7 touchdowns.

Who wouldn't be satisfied with that from Hank?

Me.  I expect 2500 yards and 16 TD's this year from him - not including his obvious 500 yards and 6 TD's in the playoffs.

[ice grillin you]

ill be satisfied if he has any touchdown catches this year

[General_Failure]

Play nice, retards.

[PoopyfaceMcGee]

Play nice, retards.

Don't worry - we're probably due for another period of server unavailability soon anyway, right?

[Rome]

How about an "Ask Hank" forum?

Set it up, PG...