Sixers offseason

Started by MURP, April 22, 2006, 01:02:17 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

hunt

slow down...i never said the nets were going to accept the offer.

i mean, would you?
lemonade was a popular drink and it still is

reese125

Quote from: ice grillin you on June 27, 2006, 03:54:23 PM
Rando isn't a good enough shooter to be the best guard in any draft

either were tony parker jaamal tinsley kirk hinrich or tj ford

just a little confused about ford and tinsley-they are more assists guys than anything. Ill give you the other 2 though

ice grillin you

the point being that players who come out of college as not being good shooters can go on to have very good nba careers
i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

PoopyfaceMcGee

They also can not, and more often do not.

Drunkmasterflex

I wouldn't have a problem with them drafting Rando as long as they get rid of Iverson.  I agree with FF though the league has many more players that fail in the NBA because they can't shoot as opposed to the exceptions that you mentioned IGY.
Official Sponsor of #58 Trent Cole

The gods made Trent Cole-Sloganizer.net

"People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf." George Orwell

ice grillin you

yeah if youre a shooting guard and cant shoot you will fail

many point guards cant/wont shoot...in fact when they do or will shoot usually they arent that good of a pt guard...do i wish he shot a little better sure....but i have no problem with him not shooting at first learning the nba point game and then worry about his shot later...no better place to start to build than with a true one (other than a big man but there are no big men anymore)
i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

PoopyfaceMcGee

He's simply not that great.  He will almost certainly be there at #13, and the Sixers will almost certainly pass.

ice grillin you

that would be a HUGE mistake
i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

reese125

enough of the fascination with a guy that isnt that good already IGY. I really think your high on him because you see a PG that will be there at 13, if AI goes they will need a PG, if the Sixers pick him...you look like a genius that pulled a
Nostradamus.

Stop yourself with the "huge mistake" nonsense

ice grillin you

ill say it again and maybe you can follow this time...AI has absolutely no bearing on who they pick this year...and he shouldnt
i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

reese125

ok, then your obsessiveness with a subpar PG who wont make a lick of an impact is?

SunMo

I'm the Anti-Christ. You got me in a vendetta kind of mood.

phattymatty

Quote from: ice grillin you on June 28, 2006, 08:52:28 AM
ill say it again and maybe you can follow this time...AI has absolutely no bearing on who they pick this year...and he shouldnt

i agree, i don't see how's iverson's status affects the draft at all, other then possibly getting more draft picks in an iverson trade.

i'm not that big on rondo, but i do want a PG, and if Marcus Williams is gone at 13 i'm fine with us taking Rondo.

hunt

lemonade was a popular drink and it still is

ice grillin you

im half kidding about rondo but he is still my number one guy...however id be more than happy with marcus williams
i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous