Q & A With Andy Reid

reese125 · March 31, 2006, 10:59:11 AM

Quote from: Wingspan on March 31, 2006, 10:54:38 AM
maybe so...but there is no way he's trade bait that would entice anyone to look twice.

this statement couldnt be more false. Have you seen what this offseason has produced in contract terms with no-namers? Your telling me a team wouldnt want help on the defensive line with a young player who came from a solid organization....puff.. puff.. pass

SunMo · March 31, 2006, 11:01:20 AM

Quote from: reese125 on March 31, 2006, 10:59:11 AM
Your telling me a team wouldnt want help. . . a young player who came from a solid organization

Freddie Mitchell says hi.

reese125 · March 31, 2006, 11:02:57 AM

Quote from: Sun_Mo on March 31, 2006, 11:01:20 AM
Quote from: reese125 on March 31, 2006, 10:59:11 AM
Your telling me a team wouldnt want help. . . a young player who came from a solid organization

Freddie Mitchell says hi.

whats coveted more Mo...DL or WR? Apprecite it

Wingspan · March 31, 2006, 11:04:39 AM

Quote from: reese125 on March 31, 2006, 10:59:11 AM
Quote from: Wingspan on March 31, 2006, 10:54:38 AM
maybe so...but there is no way he's trade bait that would entice anyone to look twice.

this statement couldnt be more false. Have you seen what this offseason has produced in contract terms with no-namers? Your telling me a team wouldnt want help on the defensive line with a young player who came from a solid organization....puff.. puff.. pass

like who?

the difference being of any of these "no-namers" they are given 1 year deals...a team would not trade for a no-namer. why would any team trade any pick for mcdougle when they can use that pick on a DE?

besides, mcdougle isnt all that "young" he was an older rookie. he's going to be 28 this year.

no one would give up anything for mcdougle.

SunMo · March 31, 2006, 11:04:54 AM

just stop trying to prove you inane point that Jerome McDougle has any sort of trade value.

"He got shot."
"Is it bad?"
"As opposed to good?"

reese125 · March 31, 2006, 11:07:43 AM

Quote from: Wingspan on March 31, 2006, 11:04:39 AM
Quote from: reese125 on March 31, 2006, 10:59:11 AM
Quote from: Wingspan on March 31, 2006, 10:54:38 AM
maybe so...but there is no way he's trade bait that would entice anyone to look twice.

this statement couldnt be more false. Have you seen what this offseason has produced in contract terms with no-namers? Your telling me a team wouldnt want help on the defensive line with a young player who came from a solid organization....puff.. puff.. pass

like who?

the difference being of any of these "no-namers" they are given 1 year deals...a team would not trade for a no-namer. why would any team trade any pick for mcdougle when they can use that pick on a DE?

besides, mcdougle isnt all that "young" he was an older rookie. he's going to be 28 this year.

no one would give up anything for mcdougle.

Cmon Wingspan...you package him....I repeat "bait", not a 1-1 McDougle for a superstar WR

Wingspan · March 31, 2006, 11:10:13 AM

i'd package him with no return address on the box.

no one in their right mind would take mcdougle. he wouldnt be the missing peice to any trade.

SunMo · March 31, 2006, 11:10:42 AM

wing, it's not woth it. just cut your losses.

reese125 · March 31, 2006, 11:11:28 AM

Quote from: Sun_Mo on March 31, 2006, 11:04:54 AM
just stop trying to prove you inane point that Jerome McDougle has any sort of trade value.

"He got shot."
"Is it bad?"
"As opposed to good?"

....and I thought you had some knowledge of whats tradeable Mo. You trying to go against my every word/statement is more than pitiful. Be gone

PoopyfaceMcGee · March 31, 2006, 11:11:46 AM

reese, I can see why your idea might warrant some merit inside your own head, but trust me on this: McDougle won't be "bait" or be part of ANY trade this year, unless it's closer to the season and he's played his ass off in a few pre-season games. His trade value is ZERO right now, man. NOTHING.

The only Eagles players with any trade value that could conceivably be traded:

Hood
D. Walker

That's it.

SunMo · March 31, 2006, 11:15:50 AM

reese, you're a stupid douche bag. how many players have gotten traded this offseason? not many. the ones that were traded, what did people give back? draft picks. a former 1st round DE who has shown NOTHING other than the ability to get injured and shot is not going to warrant ANY interest from ANY team.

for you to, first of all, even think that McDougle could be traded is laughable. but for you to continue to drive at this moronic point that somehow he has any value to any team makes me wonder how you have made it through life this long.

i repeat, if Jerome McDougle was cut today, the chances are greater than 75% that he would not be on any team come opening day.

reese125 · March 31, 2006, 11:20:00 AM

Quote from: Sun_Mo on March 31, 2006, 11:15:50 AM
reese, you're a stupid douche bag. how many players have gotten traded this offseason? not many. the ones that were traded, what did people give back? draft picks. a former 1st round DE who has shown NOTHING other than the ability to get injured and shot is not going to warrant ANY interest from ANY team.

for you to, first of all, even think that McDougle could be traded is laughable. but for you to continue to drive at this moronic point that somehow he has any value to any team makes me wonder how you have made it through life this long.

i repeat, if Jerome McDougle was cut today, the chances are greater than 75% that he would not be on any team come opening day.

delete

MURP · March 31, 2006, 11:20:18 AM

Reno Mahe has more trade value than McDougle.

PoopyfaceMcGee · March 31, 2006, 11:20:29 AM

Wait, so is Jerome McDougle available? I think the Eagles should get him!

SunMo · March 31, 2006, 11:21:06 AM

Quote from: reese125 on March 31, 2006, 11:20:00 AM

delete

as much as i thought i'd get from you when i presented a factual arguement