New El Stop: Broad and Pattison?

Started by PhillyPhreak54, February 24, 2006, 07:56:53 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Sgt PSN

There are much cheaper ways of solving the PR issues besides Randle El. 

Feva

#61
Quote from: Jerome99RIP on February 25, 2006, 06:26:10 PM
I also want Moulds.   I just don't see the Eagles bringing in a 30+ year-old receiver with a past history of attitude troubles. 

Fool me once & whatnot...

He doesn't really have attitude problems though.  He had the issue this past year with Mularkey and that's all that's on this guy's record his whole 10 year career.  Nothing like the resident (for the next week or so, anyway) shteinhead.

Moulds is 32 now and will be 33 in July... 5 months older than TO.

Rod Smith is 36 (May)
Jimmy Simth is 37
Isaac Bruce is 33 (34 in Nov)
Joey Galloway is 35
Terry Glenn is 34 (July)
Meshawn is 34 (July)
Keenan McCardell is 36

All guys on the north side of 30 who are still getting it done and could step in and help the Eagles if they were available.  Some are... or will be.  All we need is a reliable stop-gap who can contribute for a few years.
"Now I'm completing up the other half of that triangle" - Emmitt Smith on joining Troy Aikman and Michael Irvin in the Hall of Fame

"If you have sex with a prostitute against her will, is that considered rape or shoplifting?" -- 2 Live Stews

Feva

Quote from: FFatPatt on February 25, 2006, 06:26:51 PM
I think Randle El will carry a large price tag, but he also solves our PR issues.

Quote from: Sgt PSN on February 25, 2006, 06:42:59 PM
There are much cheaper ways of solving the PR issues besides Randle El. 

Jeremy Bloom?
"Now I'm completing up the other half of that triangle" - Emmitt Smith on joining Troy Aikman and Michael Irvin in the Hall of Fame

"If you have sex with a prostitute against her will, is that considered rape or shoplifting?" -- 2 Live Stews

hunt

yeah, moulds would be able to fill the "#1 wr" role for a couple years until brown is ready to carry the load...
don't get me wrong, i wouldn't mind randal el, but only as a #3 wr/punt returner & not if his salary will prevent them from upgrading in other areas...de, dt, olb.
lemonade was a popular drink and it still is

Geowhizzer


hunt

lemonade was a popular drink and it still is

Sgt PSN

This thread's getting awfully repetitive so I'm going to offer a new point of view. 

Moulds will be a great fit because he's only going to play for a couple more years and by that time, Reggie Brown will be ready to step up. 

Randle El would certainly be a nice addition to the team, but he's going to cost too much money to use in a back up/special teams role.

Farg Dallas.   

PhillyPhanInDC

Quote from: Sgt PSN on February 25, 2006, 08:49:51 PM
This thread's getting awfully repetitive so I'm going to offer a new point of view. 

Moulds will be a great fit because he's only going to play for a couple more years and by that time, Reggie Brown will be ready to step up. 

Randle El would certainly be a nice addition to the team, but he's going to cost too much money to use in a back up/special teams role.

Farg Dallas.   

David Givens> Randle El.

Moulds is a long shot, but if it doesn't happen with him, let Givens be the next in line.
"The very existence of flamethrowers proves that some time, somewhere, someone said to themselves, "You know, I want to set those people over there on fire, but I'm just not close enough to get the job done.""  R.I.P George.

PhillyPhreak54

Right on.

Moulds
Givens
Randle El

Thats my wishlist. And Randle El could be pushed by a few other guys for that 3rd spot too.

hunt

david givens=torrance small=james thrash=charles johnson= :puke:
lemonade was a popular drink and it still is

Diomedes

Quote from: Sgt PSN on February 25, 2006, 08:49:51 PM
Moulds will be a great fit because he's only going to play for a couple more years and by that time, Reggie Brown will be ready to step up. 

Randle El would certainly be a nice addition to the team, but he's going to cost too much money to use in a back up/special teams role.

You just don't get it, dude.

The only thing Moulds is good for is a stopgap #1 until Brown is the #1.

And sure, Randle El WILL improve our Special Teams and Offense, but he is NEVER going to be a #1.  Unfortunately, it looks like he might command that much money in the current market.

There is considerable overlap between the intelligence of the smartest bears and the dumbest tourists." - Yosemite Park Ranger

General_Failure

The real problem is Randle El will be expensive, and Moulds would only be around for a couple years until Brown steps up. It's a dilly of a pickle.

The man. The myth. The legend.

PhillyPhanInDC

#72
Quote from: Diomedes on February 25, 2006, 09:01:28 PM
Quote from: Sgt PSN on February 25, 2006, 08:49:51 PM
Moulds will be a great fit because he's only going to play for a couple more years and by that time, Reggie Brown will be ready to step up. 

Randle El would certainly be a nice addition to the team, but he's going to cost too much money to use in a back up/special teams role.

You just don't get it, dude.

The only thing Moulds is good for is a stopgap #1 until Brown is the #1.

And sure, Randle El WILL improve our Special Teams and Offense, but he is NEVER going to be a #1.  Unfortunately, it looks like he might command that much money in the current market.



I think that is pretty much the point Dio.

I think the argument is that there are some people who feel Reggie is not ready to be the #1 this season. Kind of a 1.5 so to speak. Moulds/Givens would be able to help in taking up some of the slack left by Owens, while Reggie snaps into the number one spot, but also be there if Reggie has a sophomore slump.
Randle El would be great to have to shore up the special teams, and the #3/Slot position. He also adds more value on the gimmick side of the house. He is not on the same level as Givens, Moulds, and dare I say it, Reggie in terms of being a receiver. There is no doubt that ARE is the answer to the teams KR/PR issues, and the slot/#3 spot, he could possibly become a number two, but has never demonstrated the ability to due so.
The amounts of money he is going to want, and more than likely get, is not in the least bit congruent with his utility as a receiver. When you factor in his gimmick ability and his talents on STs, that increases his value, and whether that makes him worth the money is debateable. IMO Randle El is not the answer to the teams WR problems.
"The very existence of flamethrowers proves that some time, somewhere, someone said to themselves, "You know, I want to set those people over there on fire, but I'm just not close enough to get the job done.""  R.I.P George.

Diomedes

Quote from: PhillyPhaninDC on February 25, 2006, 09:13:13 PMI think that is pretty much the point Dio.

One easy way to tell if a joke you made was funny or not is if people don't even realize it's a joke.  That counts as a real good sign that you weren't funny.

But you're just one person.  I choose to believe other people will understand what I'm saying and chuckle.  Maybe just a little.  I'm a man of faith.

So yeah, about that next round....
There is considerable overlap between the intelligence of the smartest bears and the dumbest tourists." - Yosemite Park Ranger

The BIGSTUD

Givens I'd take, but only because he's probably going to be pretty cheap. He's nothing more than a possession receiver. I'm in the majority with Moulds.

Is there any possibility that the Eagles are using Randle El as a smoke screen?
Calling it right on the $ since day one.
Just pointing laughing, and living it up while watching the Miami Heat stink it up.