College Players The Eagles Are Interested In

Started by PhillyPhreak54, January 23, 2006, 10:07:01 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

PhillyPhreak54

Greenway is on there. I just didn't list him because he is already on the main list.

PhillyPhanInDC

Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on March 06, 2006, 11:22:46 PM
Greenway is on there. I just didn't list him because he is already on the main list.

He probably isn't now. I hope.
"The very existence of flamethrowers proves that some time, somewhere, someone said to themselves, "You know, I want to set those people over there on fire, but I'm just not close enough to get the job done.""  R.I.P George.

Don Ho

QuoteEugene, who trimmed 40 pounds of excess weight in off-season training, gained a rare invite to the scouting combine in Indianapolis last week. Now, he's setting up individual follow-up tryouts with select teams — including a session with the Philadelphia Eagles on March 17

40 lbs.?  How big was he?
"Well where does Jack Lord live, or Don Ho?  That's got to be a nice neighborhood"  Jack Singer(Nicholas Cage) in Honeymoon in Vegas.

MURP

Quote from: NGM on February 27, 2006, 01:19:28 PM
Quote from: EagleFeva on February 27, 2006, 01:16:56 PM
9 feet 5 inches in the broad jump for Bunkley... explosive.  :yay

Workout warriors, no matter how productive, always scare me.

So you would rather have a productive guy in college who stinks it up at the combine?

MURP

Quote from: Don Ho on March 06, 2006, 11:29:29 PM
QuoteEugene, who trimmed 40 pounds of excess weight in off-season training, gained a rare invite to the scouting combine in Indianapolis last week. Now, he's setting up individual follow-up tryouts with select teams — including a session with the Philadelphia Eagles on March 17

40 lbs.?  How big was he?

reminded me of Jared Lorenzen without the height. 

rjs246

QuoteSo you would rather have a productive guy in college who stinks it up at the combine?

I would. A productive player indicates an ability to actually play the game. Measurables have value, but not nearly as much value as actual production on the field. Remember when Terrell Suggs stunk it up at the combine and he dropped in the first round? He was productive in college but didn't measure well at the combine. He's had 30+ sacks in three years. Production, to me, is WAY more important than workout numbers.
Is rjs gonna have to choke a bitch?

Let them eat bootstraps.

SunMo

Quote from: rjs246 on March 07, 2006, 09:42:12 AM


I would. A productive player indicates an ability to actually play the game. Measurables have value, but not nearly as much value as actual production on the field. Remember when Terrell Suggs stunk it up at the combine and he dropped in the first round? He was productive in college but didn't measure well at the combine. He's had 30+ sacks in three years. Production, to me, is WAY more important than workout numbers.

so it would matter more to you that a college quarterback completes 65% of his passes and throws for 3,000 yards while running for just under a 1,000 than scoring a 6 on his wonderlic test?
I'm the Anti-Christ. You got me in a vendetta kind of mood.

rjs246

Oh shtein I'm trapped!

I would say that QB is a different beast since LOTS of productive college qbs don't live up to their numbers in the pros (especially QBs with awful throwing motions who tend to run under pressure and aren't the brightest, but I digress...), but your point is taken.

I still say production is more important at other (especially defensive) positions. Ass.
Is rjs gonna have to choke a bitch?

Let them eat bootstraps.

SunMo

i agree with you.  i was just pointing out that Vince Young was very productive in college.  but you're right, QB's are different.  just ask Danny Weurffel, David Klingler, Gino Terretta.
I'm the Anti-Christ. You got me in a vendetta kind of mood.

rjs246

Is rjs gonna have to choke a bitch?

Let them eat bootstraps.

SunMo

I'm the Anti-Christ. You got me in a vendetta kind of mood.

rjs246

Is rjs gonna have to choke a bitch?

Let them eat bootstraps.


MURP

Quote from: rjs246 on March 07, 2006, 09:42:12 AM
QuoteSo you would rather have a productive guy in college who stinks it up at the combine?

I would. A productive player indicates an ability to actually play the game. Measurables have value, but not nearly as much value as actual production on the field. Remember when Terrell Suggs stunk it up at the combine and he dropped in the first round? He was productive in college but didn't measure well at the combine. He's had 30+ sacks in three years. Production, to me, is WAY more important than workout numbers.


yeah, I was referring to NGM saying it didnt matter how productive they were.


Quote from: NGM on February 27, 2006, 01:19:28 PM
Workout warriors, no matter how productive, always scare me.


More or less saying  that if there were two players who had equal production on the field,  one would rather have the player who did worse in workouts.   

PoopyfaceMcGee

The issue with guys with good workouts is that it makes it harder to accurately evaluate these kids as football players, because the teams are so blinded by athletic ability.

I'm guilty of this with a guy like Bunkley.  But before the combine, I thought he'd be a good fit in the Eagles system if they traded down for him.  Now, I think getting him at 14 would be great... but he's no better a player than he was before.