Moulds Suspended?

PhillyPhreak54 · December 19, 2005, 04:53:50 PM

I do.

Phreak > Gargano

I wonder if The Cuz knows anything inside? He's boys with Heckert. I'll choose to believe that he does have inside info and that we'll see Moulds here in a few months.

PoopyfaceMcGee · December 19, 2005, 04:56:42 PM

I'm ok with seeing Moulds in Philly. I just hope you all realize he's not nearly as good a player as T.O. was for us.

rjs246 · December 19, 2005, 04:57:40 PM

Quote from: FFatPatt on December 19, 2005, 04:56:42 PM
I'm ok with seeing Moulds in Philly. I just hope you all realize he's not nearly as good a player as T.O. was for us.

Preposterous!

DH · December 19, 2005, 04:59:23 PM

Quote from: FFatPatt on December 19, 2005, 04:56:42 PM
I'm ok with seeing Moulds in Philly. I just hope you all realize he's not nearly as good a player as T.O. was for us.

Who?

PoopyfaceMcGee · December 19, 2005, 05:00:38 PM

That's just the problem. He's not going to make anyone forget about #81.

PhillyPhreak54 · December 19, 2005, 05:05:14 PM

No, but Moulds is a good solid WR. He's no stud, but he's the best of what will be out there. I'm still not sold on Wayne yet.

PoopyfaceMcGee · December 19, 2005, 05:06:16 PM

Wayne has a higher ceiling and equal floor to Moulds, IMO. But he'll cost a lot more.

Get them both, I say. And Kevin Johnson.

SunMo · December 19, 2005, 05:10:27 PM

IMO, they don't NEED a dominant #1 like TO. he definitley helped when he was here on the field, but it's not as if they can't win without him. they just need to improve the overall WR corps. Green Bay had a great team that won a Super Bowl and made it to another one with a good running back, a great quarterback, a very good defense and a WR corps that was solid from top to bottom. New England is the same way, so is Seattle.

and that's what AR was trying to accomplish before TO, the problem was, they were not good enough as a group. but with if you can add Moulds to Brown, and Pinkston that group is much better than the group of Thrash, Pinkston, and Mitchell

DH · December 19, 2005, 05:17:54 PM

I tend to agree with Mo. We didn't have a marquee guy in the first 3 NFCCG's. Signing Owens was an abberation. I've been saying all along that we had a Jerry Rice type guy in his prime, so going on that notion it will be impossible to bring in anybody that will make us forget about 81. Javon Walker wouldn't even do it.

But, Moulds would upgrade our corps at WR, so why not get him?

PoopyfaceMcGee · December 19, 2005, 05:21:09 PM

I honestly do agree the Eagles should get Moulds, or Wayne, or some other #1.5 receiver out there. That's the best way to ensure that Donovan will have someone to throw to, IMO. I'm just saying that the team will also need Pinkston to contribute and Reggie to keep improving. Neither of those things are certain.

The BIGSTUD · December 19, 2005, 07:16:34 PM

From the 3 or 4 Bills games I saw this year Moulds still looks very fresh and healthy. But with the Eagles luck if they sign him he becomes old and bad.

DH · December 19, 2005, 11:31:06 PM

Quote from: Philly Forever on December 19, 2005, 07:16:34 PM
But with the Eagles luck if they sign him he becomes old.

Think theres a team out there that can slow the aging process?