College Basketball Thread

Started by Eagles_Legendz, December 04, 2005, 11:01:58 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

phattymatty

someone here has some issues.


and that tenn. memphis game last night was sick.   but farg tennessee, i get annoyed by schools who are good at every sport.

MDS

Zero hour, Michael. It's the end of the line. I'm the firstborn. I'm sick of playing second fiddle. I'm always third in line for everything. I'm tired of finishing fourth. Being the fifth wheel. There are six things I'm mad about, and I'm taking over.

Cerevant

MDS's last 5 posts in the "Penn State Rules" thread:

Quote from: MDS on February 06, 2008, 06:21:16 PM
I think this was the guy I heard today didn't want to go to Michigan because he thought Rodriguez was a fleshpop.

But I also heard that everyone at PSU is beyond tired with Joe Pa's schtick, as if that is any kind of news.
Trash the hall of fame coach, check.
Quote from: MDS on February 06, 2008, 05:01:35 PM
I went to the Temple signing day press conference (zzzzzzz). Still infinitely better than getting worked up over how Penn State is going to field a 4th place Big Ten team.
Team is not successful, check.
Quote from: MDS on January 30, 2008, 01:54:57 PM
That picture is definitely the greatest thing to ever happen in State College, PA.
Trash the town, check.
Quote from: MDS on January 08, 2008, 04:02:51 PM
i right now am a better coach than joe paterno, and i would throw every game because i want penn state to rot.
Quote from: MDS on January 07, 2008, 12:12:08 PM
Is this anything new? PSU misses out on a top prospect because no one in their right mind wants to go play for a second rate Big Ten school.
"second rate", check.

Quote from: MDS on February 24, 2008, 12:56:25 PM
wow youre nuts
Pot, meet kettle.  I am very carefully patterning my posts in this thread after your insightful Penn State commentary.  Now you know how to stop me from coming back and doing this again next year.
An ad hominem fallacy consists of asserting that someone's argument is wrong and/or he is wrong to argue at all purely because of something discreditable/not-authoritative about the person or those persons cited by him rather than addressing the soundness of the argument itself.

phattymatty

Quote from: Cerevant on February 25, 2008, 05:38:44 AM
I am very carefully patterning my posts in this thread after your insightful Penn State commentary.  Now you know how to stop me from coming back and doing this again next year.

haha.  that's a pretty mean threat.

MDS

comparing temple basketball to penn state football is strange. one fanbase just wants to be a good second-rate conference team and make the tourney most of the time. the other fan base expects to win national championships and win a power conference. so.....
Zero hour, Michael. It's the end of the line. I'm the firstborn. I'm sick of playing second fiddle. I'm always third in line for everything. I'm tired of finishing fourth. Being the fifth wheel. There are six things I'm mad about, and I'm taking over.

PoopyfaceMcGee

Quote from: MDS on February 25, 2008, 12:59:25 PM
comparing temple basketball to penn state football is strange. one fanbase just wants to be a good second-rate conference team and make the tourney most of the time. the other fan base expects to win national championships and win a power conference. so.....

Your assumptions are incorrect.

ice grillin you

Quote from: FastFreddie on February 25, 2008, 01:03:06 PM
Quote from: MDS on February 25, 2008, 12:59:25 PM
comparing temple basketball to penn state football is strange. one fanbase just wants to be a good second-rate conference team and make the tourney most of the time. the other fan base expects to win national championships and win a power conference. so.....

Your assumptions are incorrect.


yeah as a penn state fan id be more than happy to just be as good as wisconsin
i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

Cerevant

Quote from: MDS on February 25, 2008, 12:59:25 PM
comparing temple basketball to penn state football is strange. one fanbase just wants to be a good second-rate conference team and make the tourney most of the time.

That's because that's all they ever do, all they have ever done.

Quotethe other fan base expects to win national championships and win a power conference. so.....

That's because they have done it before.  Since Temple last made the final four,  Penn state had 2 National Championships, 2 Big Ten Conference Championships (one of which was 2 seasons ago), and 5 undefeated seasons.

But I wasn't the one comparing the two.  I just got annoyed at you trolling the Penn State thread, so I thought I'd come and troll the basketball thread (since there isn't a Temple Thread).
An ad hominem fallacy consists of asserting that someone's argument is wrong and/or he is wrong to argue at all purely because of something discreditable/not-authoritative about the person or those persons cited by him rather than addressing the soundness of the argument itself.

ice grillin you

the difference is when the lil guy hungry hungry hippos its cute....when you do it you sound like a psychotic lumberjack from sault st marie
i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

MDS

where exactly is sault st marie, oh kind sir?
Zero hour, Michael. It's the end of the line. I'm the firstborn. I'm sick of playing second fiddle. I'm always third in line for everything. I'm tired of finishing fourth. Being the fifth wheel. There are six things I'm mad about, and I'm taking over.

Cerevant

Quote from: ice grillin you on February 25, 2008, 01:21:41 PM
the difference is when the lil guy hungry hungry hippos its cute....when you do it you sound like a psychotic lumberjack from sault st marie

I can only aspire to be as good a troll as you.
An ad hominem fallacy consists of asserting that someone's argument is wrong and/or he is wrong to argue at all purely because of something discreditable/not-authoritative about the person or those persons cited by him rather than addressing the soundness of the argument itself.

SunMo

Quote from: MDS on February 25, 2008, 12:59:25 PM
the other fan base expects to win national championships and win a power conference. so.....

they do?
I'm the Anti-Christ. You got me in a vendetta kind of mood.

ice grillin you

great game on now if anyone cares

tenn-vandy

vandys gym is out of control
i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

ice grillin you

i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

Cerevant

Garbage.  They left out the A-10.  What were they thinking.
An ad hominem fallacy consists of asserting that someone's argument is wrong and/or he is wrong to argue at all purely because of something discreditable/not-authoritative about the person or those persons cited by him rather than addressing the soundness of the argument itself.