Sixers Season thread 2

Started by MURP, November 16, 2005, 10:54:47 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Rome

It's no secret that I have no love for Iverson or the way he plays the game.  He's a selfish twat on the court and always has been.

They're not going to win anything with him as the focal point of the team.

Bash me all you want about my opinions.  I'm right, you're wrong and that's all there is to it.

ice grillin you

I really don't care.

I do think it's funny that whenever someone dares mention the possibility that the Sixers might be better off without Iverson, some of you f'n lose it like 10 year-old school girls.
i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

Rome

* Sighs *

::)

QuoteI really don't care.

That was a response to FF's comments about Iverson.

I really don't care if they're better with him or without him because I don't care what their record is while he's still a member of the team.  When he's gone, I'll be back on board as a fan.

Is that simple enough for you to understand?

hunt

hah!  all the a1 groupies are in defense mode.  i love it. :-D

and i don't think any rational person would say they'd be better off just cutting or not playing him...not that you can do that in the nba.  but i do think they'd be better off trading him for a more team oriented star player.

one thing's for sure...they play team basketball when he's not there & i'd rather watch that style of play any day of the week.

lemonade was a popular drink and it still is

ice grillin you

#724
they are a .500 team with iverson or with another 'star' player...if youre talking asthetically id rather watch iverson over any player in the nba

right now at this point in time however for the welfare of the younger players and their development id release iverson or trade him for whatever....i wouldnt even need a star player in return
i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

Rome

You'd release him or trade him for peanuts yet I'm the hater?

Seek help, kid.  Seriously.

:-D

ice grillin you

im a realest.....you a hater

this is the problem i mentioned earlier in this thread...people are so obssesed with their position on the internet that they cant ever come off it even a little...because they think it hurts their cyber rep...for example hunts dream was for iverson to get hurt and pray the sixers win so he could jump up and down and say i told you iverson sucks then search around in newpaper articles for cryptic quotes that are supposely bashing iverson...thats called an internet sports fan

i on the other hand live in the real world...where i can acknowledge that iverson is one of the 25 best players to ever play in the league and that he makes the team much better yet at the same time know that the younger players futures would be better served without iverson on the team...

and thats me talking about one of my all-time favorite athletes

thats me keeping it real son

realer than an innocent child turned killer
i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

SD_Eagle5

Quote from: mhunt on January 30, 2006, 09:02:37 AM
hah!  all the a1 groupies are in defense mode.  i love it. :-D

and i don't think any rational person would say they'd be better off just cutting or not playing him...not that you can do that in the nba.  but i do think they'd be better off trading him for a more team oriented star player.one thing's for sure...they play team basketball when he's not there & i'd rather watch that style of play any day of the week.



I've agreed with you many times on this point. Give me a decent player in return and I'd have no problem moving him.

hunt

don't pretend to know what i think, vanilla.  my dream is for the sixers to finally realize that they're going nowhere with a1 & that it's time to trade him & change the structure of the team.
saying they should dump him for nothing is just stupid.

lemonade was a popular drink and it still is

PoopyfaceMcGee

Trading Iverson just to trade Iverson is a really stupid idea.  Just dumb.

Trading him and getting value that can help the team become elite is a good idea.  At least it's admitting that the current plan is not working and trying something that might be productive.

Keeping Iverson is... an idea that is certain to leave the Sixers a notch or three below elite teams.  Is Iverson one of the most exciting players in the history of the NBA?  Yes.  Does he sell tickets?  Absolutely, but decreasingly so now that the novelty has worn off.  Will he ever be the focal point of an NBA Champion basketball team?  No.

hunt

you're such an internet fan.
lemonade was a popular drink and it still is

PoopyfaceMcGee

Guilty as charged.

And yes, I'm aware that getting any kind of similar value or someone(s) with more long-term upside for AI is something that would be very difficult to make happen.

Rome

Quote from: mhunt on January 30, 2006, 10:07:28 AM
don't pretend to know what i think, vanilla.  my dream is for the sixers to finally realize that they're going nowhere with a1 & that it's time to trade him & change the structure of the team.
saying they should dump him for nothing is just stupid.

Werd to yo mama.  You know, or something like that.

:-\

hunt

Quote from: Jerome99RIP on January 30, 2006, 11:38:36 AM
Quote from: mhunt on January 30, 2006, 10:07:28 AM
don't pretend to know what i think, vanilla.  my dream is for the sixers to finally realize that they're going nowhere with a1 & that it's time to trade him & change the structure of the team.
saying they should dump him for nothing is just stupid.

Werd to yo mama.  You know, or something like that.

:-\

4 real.
using rap lingo on the internet is more hip than howie mandel's soul patch...and that's hip!
lemonade was a popular drink and it still is

Rome