TO Press Conference at 3

Started by PhillyandBCEagles, November 08, 2005, 02:18:10 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

PhillyPhreak54

I missed this whole sideshow....just woke up. I got to see TO's statement but missed Drew pouring gasoline on the bonfire.

This is all about the  :deion :deion :deion :deion

PhillyPhreak54

Quote from: bobbyinlondon on November 08, 2005, 03:51:24 PM
Since I am relying on you guys to post what is going on (by the way, great job to all of you  :yay), here's the question: Now that he apparently has been contrite, made the apologies that were necessary from the beginning, do any of you think the Eagles give him another chance? I know I've read a few articles today that said someone with the team has told other NFL officials that they don't really care if they lose the greivance.

Nope....SalPal just reported from TO's front lawn that his sources with the Birds said they were all watching and they wll not take him back at all. They want him gone so bad they will pay him for all 9 games and not take his SB back.

Rome

I just heard the audio and kept thinking that they should have been playing "Who's Sorry Now" by Connie Francis in the background.

QuoteWho's sorry now, who's sorry now
Whose heart is achin' for breakin' each vow
Who's sad and blue, who's cryin' too
Just like I cried over you

Right to the end, just like a friend
I tried to warn you somehow
You had your way, now you must pay
I'm glad that you're sorry now

Right to the end, just like a friend
I tried to warn you somehow
You had your way, now you must pay
I'm glad that you're sorry now


:-D

PoopyfaceMcGee

Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on November 08, 2005, 03:49:46 PM
The Eagles are going to pay him for all 9 games and not go after his signing bonus at all.

According to SalPal they just want him out of here.

That's not what he said.  He said that they would rather pay him for all 9 games if it comes to that, but that they're definitely seeking the 4-game-without-pay suspension.  He did, however, say that they might not go after the $1.7m chunk of his signing bonus.

PhillyPhreak54

Quote from: FFatPatt on November 08, 2005, 03:53:59 PM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on November 08, 2005, 03:49:46 PM
The Eagles are going to pay him for all 9 games and not go after his signing bonus at all.

According to SalPal they just want him out of here.

That's not what he said.  He said that they would rather pay him for all 9 games if it comes to that, but that they're definitely seeking the 4-game-without-pay suspension.  He did, however, say that they might not go after the $1.7m chunk of his signing bonus.

Thank you for the correction

SunMo

I'm the Anti-Christ. You got me in a vendetta kind of mood.

SD_Eagle5

Quote from: bobbyinlondon on November 08, 2005, 03:51:24 PM
Since I am relying on you guys to post what is going on (by the way, great job to all of you  :yay), here's the question: Now that he apparently has been contrite, made the apologies that were necessary from the beginning, do any of you think the Eagles give him another chance? I know I've read a few articles today that said someone with the team has told other NFL officials that they don't really care if they lose the greivance.

Nope, in fact, I'd lose a lot of respect for the Eagles if they folded on their stance. It's my belief that Andy, the coaches, the players, and the front office made every reasonable attempt to talk some sense into him. They'll stick to their guns because that's the way they are.  :yay TO

PoopyfaceMcGee

It would seem the reasoning for not going after the $1.7m is this:

1.  It will help it be less of an issue to get the $700+k 4-game suspension upheld.
2.  It will reduce the amount of time that the situation drags on in arbitration, and thus take the focus off of T.O.

WEST is GOD

4 words:

Cry me a river

thanks,

bye
THIS SEASON IS OVER AND ANDY'S WORLD IS GRIDL

Offseason needs: 2 DEs, 1 DT, 1 OL, 2 LBs, 1 RB, 2 WRs, 1 TE, 1 KR.

T_Section224

Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on November 08, 2005, 03:52:03 PM
I missed this whole sideshow....just woke up. I got to see TO's statement but missed Drew pouring gasoline on the bonfire.
it was classic, extremely comical.  the string of back-to-back-to-back-to-back "Next Question" had my entire office laughing.
Proud Sponsor of Mike Bartrum

rjs246

Quote from: FFatPatt on November 08, 2005, 03:56:31 PM
It would seem the reasoning for not going after the $1.7m is this:

1.  It will help it be less of an issue to get the $700+k 4-game suspension upheld.
2.  It will reduce the amount of time that the situation drags on in arbitration, and thus take the focus off of T.O.

They way they've been playing, they may want to keep the focus on him in the hope that we'll all forget that they can't tackle.
Is rjs gonna have to choke a bitch?

Let them eat bootstraps.

PoopyfaceMcGee


Rome

As far as I'm concerned, he can keep the money he made last year.  He earned it.

As for this year's dough, if it were my money, I wouldn't pay him a plug nickel more than I already have.   He's destroyed this team's chances for returning to the Super Bowl, and as far as I'm concerned, he can choke on the biggest meatcicle in Hell for all eternity.

Seriously.  Die screaming.  End of story.

Cerevant

Quote from: FFatPatt on November 08, 2005, 03:53:59 PM
Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on November 08, 2005, 03:49:46 PM
The Eagles are going to pay him for all 9 games and not go after his signing bonus at all.

According to SalPal they just want him out of here.

That's not what he said.  He said that they would rather pay him for all 9 games if it comes to that, but that they're definitely seeking the 4-game-without-pay suspension.  He did, however, say that they might not go after the $1.7m chunk of his signing bonus.
Thanks for the clarification - that makes more sense.  I can't imagine they would let him walk scot free.  I will be severly disappointed if they don't go after the signing bonus.
An ad hominem fallacy consists of asserting that someone's argument is wrong and/or he is wrong to argue at all purely because of something discreditable/not-authoritative about the person or those persons cited by him rather than addressing the soundness of the argument itself.

mikey418

I'm an idiot.  I want to believe TO and want to believe that he would come back as the TO of last year....yet I know that won't happen.

It's like when you break up with a girl because of something she did and she comes back and apologizes and wants you back....

My heart says I want the Eagles to win and TO would help that if he's the TO of last year.
My brain says TO SUCKS.  GET THE HELL OUT OF PHILLY.

We'll always have the Ray Lewis dance...
The wannabe sponsor of Stallworth and Baskett