Phillies Offseason Talk

Started by Geowhizzer, October 02, 2005, 11:46:28 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

ice grillin you

i like him overall...i think he would be a fantastic piece to rebuiding the bullpen...i just question him as a closer...he was way less than a strikeout per inning last year...not exactly closer stuff...

i suppose he could be another todd jones...but that would be really rare

well see
i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

MURP

well if Gordon does end up sucking his contract is not a back breaker, which I find to be a big positive on a team that pays Lieberdouche 7 million +. 

PoopyfaceMcGee

Gordon's contract is, however, quite large for a non-closer.  I think he definitely is the go-to guy for the next couple of years at minimum.  No one else on the roster is MORE suited for closing, even if Gordon isn't perfect.

PoopyfaceMcGee

Goodbye "Enter Sandman".

Hello to THIS!

MDS

130 press conference will be comcast

amaro said abreu isnt going anywhere (unless they get an ace). duh.
Zero hour, Michael. It's the end of the line. I'm the firstborn. I'm sick of playing second fiddle. I'm always third in line for everything. I'm tired of finishing fourth. Being the fifth wheel. There are six things I'm mad about, and I'm taking over.

hunt

tom gordon as closer :-D
you guys are gonna absolutely love him! :-D
lemonade was a popular drink and it still is

SD_Eagle5

Ehhh...I wanted Gordon but more as a setup man for Wagner. So we refuse to give a 34 year old pitcher a 4 year deal but will give a 38 year old pitcher a 3 year deal? That makes perfect sense  :boom

We've gotten worse.  :boo

PoopyfaceMcGee

Quote from: FFatPatt on December 01, 2005, 09:14:25 PM
Quote from: MDS on December 01, 2005, 06:37:31 PM
according to jayson stark, phils are close to signing tom gordon. probably 3 years 18 mil.

So, they won't sign a 34-year-old to a 4-year deal, but they'll sign a 38-year-old to a 3-year deal.  w0ot.

Quote from: SD_Eagle on December 02, 2005, 03:09:21 PM
Ehhh...I wanted Gordon but more as a setup man for Wagner. So we refuse to give a 34 year old pitcher a 4 year deal but will give a 38 year old pitcher a 3 year deal? That makes perfect sense  :boom

Echo!

Echo!

Echo!

Echo!

Echo!

Echo!
Echo!
Echo!
Echo!

ice grillin you

So, they won't sign a 34-year-old to a 4-year deal, but they'll sign a 38-year-old to a 3-year deal

do you guys not understand that the wagner contract is for way more dollars..both per year and overall...this has nothing to do with the length of the deals


i did come up with another positive on gordon tho...hes terrible in the playoffs but thats a plus since with the phils hell never have to pitch in them
i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

BigEd76

#1104
2006 = $4.5M
2007 = $7M
2008 = $5.5M
2009 = $4.5M option or $1M buyout

They also apparently released Pedro Liriano and Franklin Perez, though the source KFFL supposedly got it from doesn't say anything about it....  ???

Edit:  AP confirmed it

PhillyPhreak54

Quote from: SD_Eagle on December 02, 2005, 03:09:21 PM
Ehhh...I wanted Gordon but more as a setup man for Wagner. So we refuse to give a 34 year old pitcher a 4 year deal but will give a 38 year old pitcher a 3 year deal? That makes perfect sense  :boom

We've gotten worse.  :boo

4 years = $43M
3 years = $18M

Yes they are close in terms of length, but in no way are they close in cash. Everyone knows I wanted Wags back, but not at that money.

And they had to give Tom Gordon a 3 year deal because of what Wags and Ryan got. Trevor Hoffman, Bob Wickman and all of the others out there will likely get 3 years too.

The way I look at it is...we had to get someone.

I would still go after Baez too.

SD_Eagle5

Quote from: PhillyPhreak54 on December 02, 2005, 08:47:09 PM
The way I look at it is...we had to get someone.

They went the cheap route -- again. We free'd up enough cash when we traded Thome to re-sign Wagner. Now we've got an older, unproven relief pitcher at a lesser price. Great. From what Gillick's saying we're not going to sign anyone else, so we've cut a ton of payroll and have gotten worse doing so.
:boo

MDS

you wanted to match 4 years 43 mil?
Zero hour, Michael. It's the end of the line. I'm the firstborn. I'm sick of playing second fiddle. I'm always third in line for everything. I'm tired of finishing fourth. Being the fifth wheel. There are six things I'm mad about, and I'm taking over.

SD_Eagle5

Quote from: MDS on December 02, 2005, 10:39:16 PM
you wanted to match 4 years 43 mil?

I wasn't in favor of it at first, but seeing what the markets dictating for closers why not? Wagner will be Gordon's age once the deals up. He's one of the top 3 closers in the game. Where else is that money going to be spent? *Nowhere*

MDS

next year towards a catcher and third basemen. more starting pitching.
Zero hour, Michael. It's the end of the line. I'm the firstborn. I'm sick of playing second fiddle. I'm always third in line for everything. I'm tired of finishing fourth. Being the fifth wheel. There are six things I'm mad about, and I'm taking over.