McCants it is. He's the Newest Eagle.

[Feva]

Would shock the hell out of me. I just don't see any reason to bump Lewis down....or Brown for that matter.

How about the possibilty of putting a better WR on the field in their place.  I mean, I believe it's McCants as well, and I'm cool with that, but I just don't understand while some of you guys seem so afraid of letting someone compete with Lewis or Brown.

[WEST is GOD]

Because if the Eagles say Lewis and Brown are the guys, then they can't possibly be wrong.

Also if the Eagles want Mccants then he is obviously better than Price. The Eagles have never made a personnel mistake since Andy got here. How dare us have our own opinions on which WR you would like to see in an Eagles uniform and shame on you for doubting the Eagles!

[PoopyfaceMcGee]

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzz

[Tomahawk]

Because if the Eagles say Lewis and Brown are the guys, then they can't possibly be wrong.

Also if the Eagles want Mccants then he is obviously better than Price. The Eagles have never made a personnel mistake since Andy got here. How dare us have our own opinions on which WR you would like to see in an Eagles uniform and shame on you for doubting the Eagles!

You make me miss NB.

[TexasEagle]

Why are you guys still talking about this? What difference doesn't make which reject wide receiver the Eagles sign? None of them are going to do anything in the short term to buck the WR pecking order so who gives a shtein who they sign?

[Wingspan]

i just realized, i dont like that half of our recievers have the same names as half of our defensive backfield.

[rjs246]

i just realized, i dont like that half of our recievers have the same names as half of our defensive backfield.

I'm having trouble reading this sentence and making it make sense.

[TexasEagle]

I just read it and moved on. There was no point in trying to make it make sense.

[Tomahawk]

i just realized, i dont like that half of our recievers have the same names as half of our defensive backfield.

I'm having trouble reading this sentence and making it make sense.

Lewis and Brown, twit.

[PoopyfaceMcGee]

twit

twut

twat

[Feva]

i just realized, i dont like that half of our recievers have the same names as half of our defensive backfield.

I'm having trouble reading this sentence and making it make sense.

Lewis and Brown, twit.

Damn... too bad our nickel back isn't Rod McCants.  Then we'd really be the ish!

[rjs246]

Ballhair.

[WEST is GOD]

I'm just saying that is how a lot of you guys come off. I mean you don't have to agree with me or anyone else, but whenever ANYONE comes on here and doesn't like a move that the Eagles make or argues with something they do, you guys jump all over them. That is ok once in a while, but that has become more of a broken record than anything. Eventually arguing over trivial stuff gets boring and that can't be proven until we see them play it out on the field. I'm sorry that I committed such a terrible crime in preferring another receiver. It is just so predictable. I knew the second I posted that they were going to regret not signing Warrick, at least 5 posters were going to be there to bash me. I don't have a problem with it, but it does get annoying having to argue for 3 pages whenever you aren't with the status quo.

[PoopyfaceMcGee]

My take is that neither Warrick nor McCants will likely be much to either team, but McCants is cheaper and is a good red-zone target... whereas Warrick still has delusions of grandeur and has failed to be a star in the NFL despite having chances to start and make a ton of plays.

The fact that you'd even think it's a big deal to "lose out" on Peter farging Warrick is laughable.
So I make fun of you, because you deserve it.

[Feva]

You feel the same way about Price as you do Warrick?