Peter Warrick

PoopyfaceMcGee · August 30, 2005, 10:49:47 AM

Quote from: ice grillin you on August 30, 2005, 10:45:47 AM
id seriously rather have reno mahe than clarett and its not really close

Me too, and I think Reno absolutely sucks. Clarett is not only a stupid, immature kid, but he sucks too.

As for Warrick, I don't think he'd really be a fit... maybe if Dexter was out for the season at PR, but he's only out for a few games as far as I've heard.

PhillyGirl · August 30, 2005, 10:51:30 AM

Quote from: Purple_Hayz on August 30, 2005, 10:47:50 AM
I'd agree that Warrick was a stud at FSU. That said, he hasn't made a big name for himself in the NFL though being a Bungle certainly hasn't helped him any in that respect. And as much of a PITA as he could potentially be I doubt that he'd be in TO territory. I'd tentatively say yes but it's not like I'm going to get an Eskin-style KJ hardon over him or anything.

hehe...I think you mean, ECKEL.

Rome · August 30, 2005, 10:52:49 AM

LOL. You beat me to it, PG.

RezRob · August 30, 2005, 10:55:34 AM

Quote from: FFatPatt on August 30, 2005, 10:49:47 AM
As for Warrick, I don't think he'd really be a fit... maybe if Dexter was out for the season at PR, but he's only out for a few games as far as I've heard.

He would look good in the slot as a playmaker. He has speed and moves. We all saw how Dillon was a different man after he left Cinci, and noone says Warrick caused more grief than Dillon did while he was there.

Quote from: Jerome99RIP on August 30, 2005, 10:48:49 AM
Playing for an organization like the Eagles could be the impetus for him to recharge his career.
At the very least, it wouldn't cost the Eagles much to take a flier on him.

I agree completely

ice grillin you · August 30, 2005, 10:58:13 AM

He would look good in the slot as a playmaker. He has speed and moves

id much rather have a big strong guy like mccants...who can also run btw...in the slot than warrick

Tomahawk · August 30, 2005, 10:58:46 AM

I originally voted no, but after reading jeromeRIP99's reasoning I change my vote. As long as the move would be the precursor to cutting Pinkston.

4and26 · August 30, 2005, 11:01:28 AM

Voted Yes - it can't hurt to take a look . . . however my gut would hate for someone like Reggie Brown to lose time if he came into camp

Larry · August 30, 2005, 11:05:47 AM

I'd have to pass. Warrick's not healthy.

Phanatic · August 30, 2005, 11:10:12 AM

He can't make the Bengals roster... Why the heck should he be on ours? Take a look sure, but sign nothing...

phattymatty · August 30, 2005, 11:28:22 AM

Why does everybody think he's a head case?

He got into a little trouble in college, having a friend of his who worked at a store give him a discount, and thats it. Big friggen deal. People seem to forget that Lav Coles was involved in that with him, but for some reason he doesn't have character problems.

Now if Warrick has done something else that I don't know about, please enlighten me, but Warrick would be far and away better than what we have now at the bottom of the roster.

rjs246 · August 30, 2005, 11:35:46 AM

Dude. Carlos Perez.

Dillen · August 30, 2005, 11:36:12 AM

Quote from: Phanatic on August 30, 2005, 11:10:12 AM
He can't make the Bengals roster... Why the heck should he be on ours? Take a look sure, but sign nothing...

Kind of a stupid question. Johnson, Houshmanzadeh, Washington, Henry is WAY better then Owens, Lewis, Brown, McMullen.

phattymatty · August 30, 2005, 11:36:18 AM

Quote from: rjs246 on August 30, 2005, 11:35:46 AM
Dude. Carlos Perez.

I know, it hurt me to say that. Shut up.

PoopyfaceMcGee · August 30, 2005, 11:36:30 AM

Quote from: phattymatty on August 30, 2005, 11:28:22 AM
Warrick would be far and away better than what we have now at the bottom of the roster.

Carlos hates you and wants new sponsorship.

phattymatty · August 30, 2005, 11:37:47 AM

It's obvious that I meant he's better than anyone after Carlos. Sheesh.

Perez for Prez.

Peter Warrick

Should the Eagles add Peter Warrick?