2005 Point & Laugh At The taterskins Thread

Wingspan · January 09, 2006, 09:52:08 PM

Quote from: Bigskinbauer on January 07, 2006, 04:57:41 AMI couldn't give a shtein of what you philly fans think

Total number of posts since bigskinbauer posted this?

7

General_Failure · January 09, 2006, 09:59:13 PM

I think he likes you.

LBIggle · January 10, 2006, 05:01:44 AM

so you guys really think your teams the real deal. maybe i was wrong.. no narcotics, it must just be something in the water.

you keep clinging to that little sliver of hope that your team might actually do something this year. you know your right back to where you belong next year.

Bigskinbauer · January 10, 2006, 07:55:50 AM

Quote from: Wingspan on January 09, 2006, 09:52:08 PM
Quote from: Bigskinbauer on January 07, 2006, 04:57:41 AMI couldn't give a shtein of what you philly fans think

Total number of posts since bigskinbauer posted this?

7

Oh in the sense of how you feel about being wrong about everything. THe skins fans are gonna say you are wrong and none of you are gonna say 'you know what i was wrong'.

Don't you know your opinions mean the world to me?

phattymatty · January 10, 2006, 01:26:45 PM

Quote from: skin48 on January 09, 2006, 07:34:29 PM
Seattle has roughly a .43 winning % for the year

I always thought that 13-3 was better than a .43 winning %. I guess you learn something new every day.

skin48 · January 10, 2006, 02:22:53 PM

Quote from: phattymatty on January 10, 2006, 01:26:45 PM
Quote from: skin48 on January 09, 2006, 07:34:29 PM
Seattle has roughly a .43 winning % for the year

I always thought that 13-3 was better than a .43 winning %. I guess you learn something new every day.

That is their opponents winning percentage.

rjs246 · January 10, 2006, 02:24:30 PM

You should try constructing coherent sentences next time to avoid confusion.

General_Failure · January 10, 2006, 05:53:45 PM

Wussa co-herring?

PhillyPhanInDC · January 10, 2006, 06:37:07 PM

Quote from: Bigskinbauer on January 09, 2006, 09:18:17 PM

QuoteWhat good team has the hawks beat? Dallas and NY both had them at home. They play in a terrible division not to mention they got houston, tenn., and indy's second string. They also benefited from a injury strickened eagle and Packer team. Seattle has roughly a .43 winning % for the year (opponents are 110-146) Washingtons % is .540 (opponents of skins are 138-118)...I will agree the hawks are a good team but their schedule was extremely soft. The pukes could have won 12 games given that schedule.

the thing is they beat everyone on that schedule no matter how easy it was. It is a factor but they are a good team regardless. They are still 3-2 to winning teams. we are 5-5 regular season and 6-5 including Tampa. basically they have beat every team on their plate. I can say they might not be as good as the hype but that doesn't mean they don't deserve credit.

Match up wise. We have been good against the run lately. If we hold shawn under 100 like last time and somehow get pressure on Matt(not gonna happen with that line) we will be fine. On offense we need to exploit the one weakness on that team; the secondary. Moss would need a field day for the skins to win but the thing is that is possible. moss can break open games, we all know that. He will need a big day and we need to play the pick your poison game with portis and moss all day. Last week we needed to establish the run game first and we didn't but this week we will need to establish the pass game first and then find running room and go back and forth. Only a perfect game plan can beat them. it will have to be flawless and the players will have to execute early on.

I think it's cute that you two mutants took a moment to pull your tongues ole' Joe's bung, but I think you forgot something. This whole post was created for us to point and make fun of you. Go to your Gibbs man love boards and discuss this shtein. Seriously, get back on topic - defending your stupid ass, phony playoff team and it's retarded fanbase.

ice grillin you · January 11, 2006, 08:10:30 AM

http://media.putfile.com/Taylor-edit29

Feva · January 11, 2006, 08:37:44 AM

Quote from: ice grillin you on January 11, 2006, 08:10:30 AM
http://media.putfile.com/Taylor-edit29

I saw that on Sounds of the Game. It was great to hear the ref's rationale of the whole thing. He's right too. You can't expect Pittman to do nothing after he got spit on. I woulda tried to knock his ass out too.

Funny how fast Stoutmire backed off once he knew what happened.

qwert246 · January 11, 2006, 08:38:30 AM

Quote from: ice grillin you on January 11, 2006, 08:10:30 AM
http://media.putfile.com/Taylor-edit29

But everyone knows Taylor didn't spit.
That must be doctored video.
Everyone is out to get Taylor. Everyone I say.

ice grillin you · January 11, 2006, 08:42:49 AM

on ES they all were saying even as of yesterday that he didnt spit...now its well he spit but it didnt even hit pittman

they also were calling for pittman to be suspened for the first game of next season

qwert246 · January 11, 2006, 09:33:58 AM

Quote from: ice grillin you on January 11, 2006, 08:42:49 AM
on ES they all were saying even as of yesterday that he didnt spit...now its well he spit but it didnt even hit pittman

they also were calling for pittman to be suspened for the first game of next season

Well, some people will always argue the homer point.

I'm not convinced he tried to spit on him, but with TJ last year, and the ref being right there, spitting even on the ground while you are jawing with someone is just stupid. He has to grow up a little obviously.

PhillyPhreak54 · January 11, 2006, 09:49:58 AM

Good find, IGY.

A clear shot of Taylor's spit hitting him in the face. You can see some of the glob fall off of Pittman's helmet.

I also like Mike Carey's explanation about it too.

Now the ES people who were saying "No way would Sean lie to Gregg Williams!" and the more ridiculous ones who were saying that Taylor was the same as Cowher.

Edit -- a few of them are blaming NFL Network for doctoring the video!!!