Marcus Mariota Watch

Started by MDS, November 17, 2014, 01:32:55 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

PhillyPhreak54

Ok let's assume that the Mariota scenarios are true and that Chip is going all IN...

What type of deal would NOT piss you off?

ice grillin you

assuming you are talking about if he plummets because theres zero chance they make a deal with tampa or anywhere near tampa i would only be ok with doing something if he fell out of the top ten (at least)
i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

PhillyPhreak54

Two situations;

1 - they trade up to anywhere between 2-6 for him. Would you be down with that? What would they have to give up in your mind to make it an awful deal?

2 - he drops to 8-10. What would you think is fair to trade up in that range?

ice grillin you

first situation is not possible and no i would not do the second one....im not even sure he can play in the league much less be willing to give up a ransom for him

if he was good enough to warrant a team moving up 15 spots into the top ten to get him then he wouldnt be available....this isnt andrew luck
i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

Zanshin

How about they don't get him, let him come up short with the team that drafts him and bring him in as a backup in a few years? Yes, I'm kidding.

AshishPatel81

I don't want them to move up for Mariota, but I'm bracing for it now just in case, so I'm not taken aback if they give up a billion picks to get him on draft day.

I didn't think it was going to happen before, but if Chip is really this obsessed with the guy....

Rome

I want a Super Bowl.

Kelly + Mariota = a minimum of (3).

Boom.

PhillyPhreak54

But the first situation IS possible if they give up enough.

I don't want them to give up a ton either but I'm also bracing myself for the deal.

BigEd76

Don't want them giving up Lane in any deal, but I'm not big on giving up three #1s either.  If Foles is part of a package to TB or Tennessee, I wouldn't be upset.....He makes sense for both

AshishPatel81

I think they would give up McCoy before they gave up Lane. Lane is a cornerstone player.

One argument I hate that people make is "Marcus Smith was a first round pick, I'd give up a few firsts for Mariota!"

Yeah, and so were Fletcher Cox, and Jeremy Maclin...

PhillyPhreak54

Speaking of Maclin...I wonder if they will bring him back now.

hbionic

Quote from: AshishPatel81 on March 03, 2015, 05:21:26 PM
I think they would give up McCoy before they gave up Lane. Lane is a cornerstone player.

One argument I hate that people make is "Marcus Smith was a first round pick, I'd give up a few firsts for Mariota!"

Yeah, and so were Fletcher Cox, and Jeremy Maclin...

Try and remember that an Eagles 1st Round draft pick is less than a 1st Round draft pick of most other teams. So, it's more like a half-pick...so giving up two #1's or even three only equals 1 to 1.5 picks really. I say pull the trigger.
I said watch the game and you will see my spirit manifest.-ILLEAGLE 02/04/05


ice grillin you

lol at not giving up lane johnson....I don't want to give up anything for mm but if you think hes a franchise qb you should be willing to give up three lane johnsons...he isn't that good
i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

MDS

if you want MM anyone outside of fletcher cox is expendable
Zero hour, Michael. It's the end of the line. I'm the firstborn. I'm sick of playing second fiddle. I'm always third in line for everything. I'm tired of finishing fourth. Being the fifth wheel. There are six things I'm mad about, and I'm taking over.

Rome

Quote from: Rome on March 02, 2015, 08:12:50 PM
Shady is going to go really soon one way or another.  You know that right?

Negrodamus up in this bitch.