The Eagles Offseason Thread(all aboard the Brian Finneran bandwagon)

Started by The BIGSTUD, December 31, 2007, 03:37:55 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Rome

Fitzgerald's talents will go to waste in Philly, you incomprehensible moron, because Westbrook will always be the #1 weapon.  WHAT PART OF THAT DON'T YOU UNDERSTAND?

Williams, on the other hand, would be a good complementary piece for the receiver corps because he'd still be effective catching 70-80 balls while still allowing Westbrook to be the featured offensive threat.

Again, Fitzgerald wouldn't be as effective in Philly as he is in AZ because the offensive system wouldn't be built around the wideouts they way they are there.


hbionic

we bitch about the things we don't have....

let's concentrate all energies into making roy or fitz happen...farg all of this bickering shtein.....they may farging get hurt in the offseason and we'll all be farged.....

...start praying!


...and we pray! :evil
I said watch the game and you will see my spirit manifest.-ILLEAGLE 02/04/05


ice grillin you

i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

reese125

Quote from: Rome on March 05, 2008, 04:01:03 PM
Fitzgerald's talents will go to waste in Philly, you incomprehensible moron, because Westbrook will always be the #1 weapon.  WHAT PART OF THAT DON'T YOU UNDERSTAND?

Williams, on the other hand, would be a good complementary piece for the receiver corps because he'd still be effective catching 70-80 balls while still allowing Westbrook to be the featured offensive threat.

Again, Fitzgerald wouldn't be as effective in Philly as he is in AZ because the offensive system wouldn't be built around the wideouts they way they are there.



Rome..sorry brother..you farged up.

So when the Eagles went to the Superbowl and Owens had 77 rec and Westbrook had 73, the offense was focused on who? There is not one person on the earth that thinks just because Fitz can catch 100 balls he automatically becomes the focal point..only you..congrats.


PoopyfaceMcGee

I only hope that the Eagles FO is having the same discussion, as it would mean either is there for the taking.

Rome


ice grillin you

i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

reese125

Quote from: Rome on March 05, 2008, 04:30:31 PM
Don't respond, don't respond, don't respond...

seriously please dont...because that argument you just posted about Fitz was painful

Rome

The idiot thinks I'm saying that Fitzgerald wouldn't be a great addition.  He would.  With apologies to PG, I'd stroke it raw if Fitz ended up with the Eagles.

I just think that the way the Eagles have the offensive structured, Williams would be a better option overall.

reese125

Back- pedaling is cool Rome. No worries. Just be careful what you say around here. Things get taken literally here sometimes.

I do expect more from you though...being that your 52 years old and all.

Rome

Quote from: Rome on March 05, 2008, 03:30:35 PM
Not that they wouldn't be unstoppable with Fitzgerald

Nothing says backtracking like saying they'd be great with him initially and then re-stating it over and over.

Father Demon

The drawback to marital longevity is your wife always knows when you're really interested in her and when you're just trying to bury it.

SunMo

reese really is turning into the worst poster on this board

"i do expect more out of you"

haha, who talks like that?
I'm the Anti-Christ. You got me in a vendetta kind of mood.

PoopyfaceMcGee


The BIGSTUD

Oh well. At least we all can agree that we'd all take Roy, Fitzgerald or Chad in a second.

and love it too.

Get one of the three. I really don't care who at this point, or what we give up.
Calling it right on the $ since day one.
Just pointing laughing, and living it up while watching the Miami Heat stink it up.