Giants Prediction Thread

Started by Father Demon, September 26, 2007, 01:50:41 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

shorebird

#15
Quote from: PhillyGirl on September 26, 2007, 04:48:57 PM
Oh please.

It all depends on the farging playcalling.

If Reidingwheg runs the ball with consistency, they'll win the game. Period.

Quote from: FastFreddie on September 26, 2007, 04:55:20 PM
Quote from: PhillyGirl on September 26, 2007, 04:48:57 PM
Reidingwheg

This is mildly amusing, but trying to put ALL the blame on the playcalling and none of it on McNabb is just lame.  He played like absolute crap in the Washington game.

Basically, despite the playcalling, this team would be 3-0 if..

  • someone could have caught a punt against Green Bay
  • McNabb could have hit the broad side of a barn against Washington

Don't delude yourself otherwise.

Thing is, if the game plan for Washington had an even run/pass ratio, the way Bwest was playing that game they might have won in spite of McNabb. Bwest was on a pace to run for 190+ yds. at halftime.

McNabb will benefit from this type of gameplan, is more effective, and it's perfectly obvious to everyone watching this team except Andy Reid. Without it, we have no chance so I'd say my first question is what the farg kind of gameplan we'll we see??

SD_Eagle5

Eagles 36
Giants 21

No idea why but when I think of this game this is the score that comes to mind. And it has nothing to do with last weeks score.

Phanatic

This post is brought to you by Alcohol!

mussa

some people will never understand the importance of calling the right plays and taking advantage of the players you have. until then they continue to blame mcnabb for everything. ha

eagles 27 giants 20
Official Sponsor of The Fire Andy Reid Club
"We be plundering the High Sequence Seas For the hidden Treasures of Conservation"

MadMarchHare

Quote from: FastFreddie on September 26, 2007, 04:55:20 PM
Quote from: PhillyGirl on September 26, 2007, 04:48:57 PM
Reidingwheg

This is mildly amusing, but trying to put ALL the blame on the playcalling and none of it on McNabb is just lame.  He played like absolute crap in the Washington game.

Basically, despite the playcalling, this team would be 3-0 if..

  • someone could have caught a punt against Green Bay
  • McNabb could have hit the broad side of a barn against Washington

Don't delude yourself otherwise.

McNabb played poorly in the first two games, but got NO help from the coaches with a running game.  Additionally, GB would have scored maybe 3 points if not for the coaching staff leaving the team with no punt returner.

Those losses are entirely on Koti-I mean, Reid.
Anyone but Reid.

shorebird

#20
Green Bay won the first game without scoring a offensive TD. Thats a game we should have won if Reid had a return man who could simply feild a punt. When I saw the way this team was totally unprepared to return a punt, it made me think that I was wrong assuming Reid could shut out all the hoopla surrounding his drug addict kids. What coach who is supposed to be as good as Reid  starts the season with a return game that preforms like it did!?!? Totally cost us that game.

McNabb sucked major dog nut in the Washington game, but a 18/46 rush/pass ratio didn't help. It was plain too see McNabb didn't have it, and yet still, Reid called almost nothing but pass plays. It's just unbelievable a coach can call a game like that and still have a job. The Hardheaded bitch! Cbuck got the ball only one time in that game. Unacceptable. I swear, to get beat at home like that against the taterskins was heartbreaking and embarrassing.

Last game we ran the ball and good things happened. They split the carries between Bwest and Cbuck/Hunt/Tapeh. This week we might see more of Cbuck and Hunt. I like Hunt and wouldn't mind seeing him get the ball more.

Magical_Retard

going into a giants eagles game i always think we should beat them by a lot but it always ends up being a close game.

you would think by now defensive guru would have figured out burress by now but he always gives us problems and he is playing pretty damn well right now. with the possibility of no lito and no dawkins again i do not like our chanches. our offense will not spark it up like that again even though the giants D is not any better than the detroit lions defense.

with that said of course i think we win but it will be a lot closer than it should be.

eagles: 21
giants 17
Marge: I have someone who can help you!
Homer: Is it BATMAN!!??
Marge: No hes a scientist
Homer: Batman is a scientist.
Marge: Its not BATMAN!

ice grillin you

pressure on eli is the key to this game...hopefully the d line is in a groove now...not sure they are as good as they showed last week but i think they are good enough to force a fumble or an interception or both

tough to make a prediction here without knowing how hurt westbrook is...i still have serious questions as to whether he will play or not...plax being a ? also throws this week into an almost impossible call

eagles could go into the 30's with a healthy westbrook or in the teens if he doesnt play...so ill go in the middle somewhere and say 27-24 birds

week 1 - eagles - loss
week 2 - skins - win
week 3 - eagles - win
week 4 - eagles - ??
i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

SunMo

i will say 31-24 Eagles

week 1 - eagles, loss
week 2 - eagles, loss
week 3 - lions, loss

0-3
I'm the Anti-Christ. You got me in a vendetta kind of mood.

Feva

I'm going to go ahead and assume that both Westbrook and Burress will play.  With that I'll say:

Eagles 27
Giants 16

Week 1 - Eagles - Loss
Week 2 - Eagles - Loss
Week 3 - Eagles - Win
Week 4 - Eagles - ??
"Now I'm completing up the other half of that triangle" - Emmitt Smith on joining Troy Aikman and Michael Irvin in the Hall of Fame

"If you have sex with a prostitute against her will, is that considered rape or shoplifting?" -- 2 Live Stews

Cerevant

I've picked the Eagles every week so far, so I'm 1-2

With the way McNabb played last week, I can't pick against them.

Close game - Eagles 23, Giants 20
An ad hominem fallacy consists of asserting that someone's argument is wrong and/or he is wrong to argue at all purely because of something discreditable/not-authoritative about the person or those persons cited by him rather than addressing the soundness of the argument itself.

PoopyfaceMcGee

Quote from: SunMo on September 28, 2007, 11:44:45 AM
i will say 31-24 Eagles

week 1 - eagles, loss
week 2 - eagles, loss
week 3 - lions, loss

0-3

It looks like picking against SunMo is a slam dunk.


I'll reverse what I previously said about the Eagles winning.  McNabb comes one more like games 1-2 than game 3.  Plaxico plays.  Lito and Westbrook don't play.

Giants 31
Eagles 23

PhillyPhreak54

week 1 - Eagles
week 2 - Eagles
week 3 - Eagles

1-2 record

Eagles 31
Giants 21

4and26


Seabiscuit36

Eagles 17  Giants 24   :-\ :-\

Westy out, not having a good feeling about this matchup. 
"For all the civic slurs, for all the unsavory things said of the Philadelphia fans, also say this: They could teach loyalty to a dog. Their capacity for pain is without limit." -Bill Lyons