NFL approves deal to play games outside US

Started by The BIGSTUD, October 24, 2006, 11:28:09 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

The BIGSTUD

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2637594

QuoteNEW ORLEANS -- Up to two NFL regular-season games will be played each year outside the United States starting in 2007, with possible sites limited at first to Mexico, Canada, England and Germany.

The plan, first announced last month, was approved Tuesday at the recommendation of new commissioner Roger Goodell, who said the benefits of reaching an international audience outweighed the negatives of some teams having to give up home games.

"We are talking about a limited number of games that we think will have a tremendous impact," Goodell said. "It's in response to the growing fan interest in our game overseas. There are more and more fans on a global basis."

Mark Waller, senior vice president of NFL International, said the league expected to schedule only one overseas game in 2007.

No specific sites were given for the games. However, Waller said the league hoped to announce the first site by this coming Super Bowl, while the teams would be selected later.

"Germany has a large number of sites as it's just done the World Cup. UK has a significant number of great sites," Waller said. "We know the sites in Mexico and Canada, so there's no shortage of venues that are interested in these games."

The plan would be set up so that teams would rotate over a 16-year period, with each team playing outside the country twice over that span, once as a visitor, the other as a home team. That means a team would lose one game team during that span.

"Obviously the league's going to work out the economics and if we lose a home game, we'll get compensated," said Pat Bowlen, owner of the Denver Broncos. "We're comfortable with it. Obviously we'd like to play in Mexico or Canada and not have to travel to Europe and that's probably the way it would be set up because of our location. But as far as the league's concerned, I think it's a great idea."

In 2005, the NFL staged its first regular-season game outside the United States when the Arizona Cardinals hosted the San Francisco 49ers in Mexico City. A crowd of 103,467 flocked to Azteca Stadium, the largest crowd for a regular-season game in NFL history.

The league also has played numerous exhibition games overseas for the past two decades. The New England Patriots and Seattle Seahawks will play a preseason game next August in Beijing.

Waller said the international popularity of certain teams would not necessarily determine who goes abroad. He said people in foreign markets were more concerned with simply hosting a regular season game, rather than exhibitions in which the best players tend to see little action.

"The overwhelming preference is the game itself," Waller said.

NFL games regularly have been televised live in Mexico and Canada and more recently in Europe, notably Britain.

The owners also voted to take the league's Web site, NFL.com, in-house after allowing CBS SportsLine to operate it for the past five years. The league plans to relaunch the site next spring with the help of other league-owned media such as NFL Films and the NFL Network.

The visit to New Orleans was a short one as most owners arrived either Monday night or Tuesday morning and left Tuesday evening.

Former NFL Commissioner Paul Tagliabue, before he officially left the job over the summer, had called for the regularly scheduled October meetings to be held in New Orleans as part of the league's show of support for the city as it rebuilds from Hurricane Katrina.

Owners and the commissioner said they have marveled at the repairs made to the Louisiana Superdome in less than a year and praised area fans for selling out the Saints' home stadium for the whole season.

However, Saints owner Tom Benson, while pleased with the progress, said the Saints still have nearly 30 of 137 suites in the Superdome unsold and added that his team lagged behind others in corporate sponsorships.

"Our sponsorship's nowhere near the level of the rest of the league," he said. "Our hospitality industry especially needs to come forward. I don't want to finger point or anything, but we have to work together in order to make this thing successful.

"The long-term market, nobody can tell right now," Benson continued. "But a year ago, before Katrina, we weren't quite sure and look what we've done. There's no telling what could happen."

As for when New Orleans, which has hosted nine Super Bowls, might get it's first since 2002, team owners were optimistic but noncommittal.

"I don't know about the next Super Bowl in line, but obviously New Orleans has always been a great place to host Super Bowls," Bowlen said. "I'd expect you'd see more."

Goodell said the bidding process for the 2011 Super Bowl will begin soon with a decision hopefully made by the next owners' meeting, slated for March in Scottsdale, Ariz.

Goodell said he has not spoken to New Orleans officials about a possible Super Bowl yet.

The Saints' lease in the Superdome ends that same season. So without an extension, the league would risk the awkward situation of placing a Super Bowl in a city that is in the process of losing its NFL franchise.

One of the cities often cited as a possible future home for the Saints or another small-market team is Los Angeles. Owners discussed a pair of proposals for a stadium in that area -- either a renovated Los Angeles Coliseum or a new stadium in Anaheim -- but there was no substantial progress made toward bringing the NFL back to the area.

One increasing concern is projected construction costs now escalating in the range of $1 billion. That makes the project decreasingly attractive to the league unless the costs are shared with the southern California public or a possible outside investor, several owners said.

"At this meeting, I don't think [NFL owners] were prepared to pay that for Los Angeles' stadium," Benson said. "I don't know if somebody else is out there that's willing to come into the NFL and do that or not. At this moment, I think it's on the back burner."

This is a total joke. All fans will be losing home games. On top of that the team loses the HFA factor. This is a terrible terrible deal, and I'm surprised people here aren't in an uproar already.

farg Goodell, that greedy POS. I hope he farging burns for this.
Calling it right on the $ since day one.
Just pointing laughing, and living it up while watching the Miami Heat stink it up.

BigEd76


The BIGSTUD

Watch them take away division games too. I'm getting so tired of the greed.

It is only a matter of time when one network owns rights to all NFL games and only airs one game a week for a huge monthly price.
Calling it right on the $ since day one.
Just pointing laughing, and living it up while watching the Miami Heat stink it up.

MDS

The fairest thing would be to move in division teams (have the game be igs-gints, skins-boys) the same year....but you cant take those games away from a. the fans and b. the top national tv spots. like the igs lose a home game but the other teams get 8? dumb ass goddell. he could get away with it if hes moves teams that are going to suck. like this year everyone knew the titans and niners would suck, so move their games.
Zero hour, Michael. It's the end of the line. I'm the firstborn. I'm sick of playing second fiddle. I'm always third in line for everything. I'm tired of finishing fourth. Being the fifth wheel. There are six things I'm mad about, and I'm taking over.

rjs246

This might be the worst idea ever. Unless both games are Cardinals games. Then who cares.
Is rjs gonna have to choke a bitch?

Let them eat bootstraps.

LBIggle


QB Eagles

Canada? The CFL can't be too fond of that.

Can't blame this on Goodell, this has been in the works for a long time under Tagliabue.

One game outside the US a year is a novelty; two is wearing out the idea. They should just make this a booby prize for the city with the lowest percentage attendance the previous year.

The BIGSTUD

The owners won't defend the fans in this either because all they care about is money too. The only way the fans get their word across is if they start burning and looting NFL owned buildings.
Calling it right on the $ since day one.
Just pointing laughing, and living it up while watching the Miami Heat stink it up.

LBIggle

no, i'm sorry.  the correct answer we were looking for was rape and pillage.

dis12

why take regular season games international?  they wouldnt know a preseason game from a reg season game!
Even International soccer (Man Utd, etc) games in the U.S. are only exhibition.
C6 at the WAC

*** SPD ***

Cerevant

Quote from: QB Eagles on October 25, 2006, 12:16:26 AM
Canada? The CFL can't be too fond of that.

Actually, it depends on when they do it: the CFL finishes their season by mid-November.  Of course, the reason for that is that it is farging cold up here after that point, but hey...those NFL guys can handle it.  Also, they don't play CFL games on Sunday - by the looks of it, all the games are Friday night or Saturday. 

Can you tell I wouldn't be heartbroken if the Eagles were scheduled to play a game at the Rogers Centre (aka Sky Dome)?

Are you all really that worried about one home game every 16 years?
An ad hominem fallacy consists of asserting that someone's argument is wrong and/or he is wrong to argue at all purely because of something discreditable/not-authoritative about the person or those persons cited by him rather than addressing the soundness of the argument itself.

ice grillin you

they will have it set up so there are 32 games over 16 years...so that way each team plays two games out of the USA....meaning in a 16 year span the eagles will lose one home game

i would prefer for it to not happen...but really its a non issue
i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

Wingspan

Quote from: ice grillin you on October 25, 2006, 09:09:15 AM
they will have it set up so there are 32 games over 16 years...so that way each team plays two games out of the USA....meaning in a 16 year span the eagles will lose one home game

i would prefer for it to not happen...but really its a non issue

ha...unless of course the owners put the international game on the season ticket bill along with an airline ticket, that should go over well.
Connection Problems

Sorry, SMF was unable to connect to the database. This may be caused by the server being busy. Please try again later.

MDS

Again, by making bad teams play the home games, you can limit the negative effect of losing a home game. Also, they should put the Eagles game in Montreal. It's 9 hours away and an amazing city. Good traveling fan bases should get games like that. So a team like the Giants can go to England or something, while we get a game on the continent.
Zero hour, Michael. It's the end of the line. I'm the firstborn. I'm sick of playing second fiddle. I'm always third in line for everything. I'm tired of finishing fourth. Being the fifth wheel. There are six things I'm mad about, and I'm taking over.

Cerevant

Quote from: MDS on October 25, 2006, 09:17:41 AM
Again, by making bad teams play the home games, you can limit the negative effect of losing a home game. Also, they should put the Eagles game in Montreal. It's 9 hours away and an amazing city. Good traveling fan bases should get games like that. So a team like the Giants can go to England or something, while we get a game on the continent.

I think we'll find that will be the case - teams with fanbases who travel well (Philly, Pittsburgh, Green Bay) will get "local" games, where the teams with crappy fan bases will go overseas.

But think Toronto - it is a bit closer, more moderate climate, and they speak english :)
An ad hominem fallacy consists of asserting that someone's argument is wrong and/or he is wrong to argue at all purely because of something discreditable/not-authoritative about the person or those persons cited by him rather than addressing the soundness of the argument itself.