Anyone seen a good movie lately?

[Zanshin]

Collatoral was okay.  Just barely okay, though.

[Wingspan]

Collatoral was okay.  Just barely okay, though.

i agree with that assessment. it was an average movie. made better by jamie foxx.

[PoopyfaceMcGee]

Its only major downfall was trying to pitch Jada Pinkett Smith as a serious actress.  She can't act worth a lick.  Both Foxx and Cruise were excellent, and I thought the pace of the movie was exciting.

[Rome]

Mrs. Will Smith can't act a lick but she's still hot.

And I agree with IGY about Vanilla Sky.  Absolutely horrible movie.  Unwatchable even under the influence of Class A narcotics.

[The BIGSTUD]

Its only major downfall was trying to pitch Jada Pinkett Smith as a serious actress.  She can't act worth a lick.  Both Foxx and Cruise were excellent, and I thought the pace of the movie was exciting.

I agree it was an entertaining flick, but at the end it starting going downhill. Where Jamie Foxx flipped that cop over and then Tom Cruise happens to pick the right subway car to jump onto. It just seemed too coincidental. It was a fun movie though.

[MadMarchHare]

Mrs. Will Smith can't act a lick but she's still hot.

And I agree with IGY about Vanilla Sky.  Absolutely horrible movie.  Unwatchable even under the influence of Class A narcotics.

You mean pot?  Because, you know, the really interesting drugs (crack, heroin, meth) are class B.

[PoopyfaceMcGee]

Its only major downfall was trying to pitch Jada Pinkett Smith as a serious actress.  She can't act worth a lick.  Both Foxx and Cruise were excellent, and I thought the pace of the movie was exciting.

I agree it was an entertaining flick, but at the end it starting going downhill. Where Jamie Foxx flipped that cop over and then Tom Cruise happens to pick the right subway car to jump onto. It just seemed too coincidental. It was a fun movie though.

I'll allow any movie a somewhat reasonable degree of "movie magic".  Some movies (like Transporter 2) are ridiculous and others take a few liberties here and there.

[Wingspan]

Its only major downfall was trying to pitch Jada Pinkett Smith as a serious actress.  She can't act worth a lick.  Both Foxx and Cruise were excellent, and I thought the pace of the movie was exciting.

I agree it was an entertaining flick, but at the end it starting going downhill. Where Jamie Foxx flipped that cop over and then Tom Cruise happens to pick the right subway car to jump onto. It just seemed too coincidental. It was a fun movie though.

I'll allow any movie a somewhat reasonable degree of "movie magic".  Some movies (like Transporter 2) are ridiculous and others take a few liberties here and there.

agreed.

if i wanted 100% realism i would watch my neighbors come home from work and tend to their garden with baited breath.

[Drunkmasterflex]

I watched Why We Fight.  Thought it was very interesting and well done.  The only thing I really didn't like about was the Ret. Lt. Col from the Air Force for some reason she rubbed me the wrong way and I did not trust her.  The person I liked the most was the retired NY Cop he was the most genuine and real person in the film.  The title was perfect for the movie, because like the film the answer to that is a very complex one. 

[The BIGSTUD]

I saw Jarhead. I thought it was okay, but not much happened. Not awful, but not all that great either.

7.3/10

[Diomedes]

My old lady watched that Johnny Cash movie last night, so I saw most of it too.  I just can't sit still for a whole movie.  Anyway, well made flick.  Witherspoon stole the movie, but Phoenix was damn good too.

[The BIGSTUD]

That is next on my movie watch list.

Walk the Line you mean I'm assuming.

[PoopyfaceMcGee]

Walk the Line you mean I'm assuming.

Wow, you should be a detective.

[reese125]

illiteracy is for special kids

[mussa]

I thought it was called boy named sue