Smoking ban in Philadelphia approved

Started by PhillyGirl, May 26, 2005, 02:24:12 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

PoopyfaceMcGee

Many bars ARE made for smoking, actually.  And for plenty of bar-going people I know, smoking is just as important as drinking.  Your argument sucks more ass than your football opinions.

SunMo

a bar is a meeting place.  you can smoke, drink, talk, play pool, or any number of things there.  a club is the same way.  but keep trying to wriggle out this one.
I'm the Anti-Christ. You got me in a vendetta kind of mood.

ice grillin you

don't go to a place that allows smoking if it bothers you

every person should have the right to go to public places without having their health affected vs people having the right to do something just cause they feel like it
i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

PoopyfaceMcGee

Banning smoking in bars is the next step to a world like "Demolition Man", where everything bad for you is against the law including fluid transfer activities, saturated fat, and alcoholic beverages.  Let's work towards that.

SunMo

Quote from: ice grillin you on June 15, 2006, 04:09:45 PM

every person should have the right to go to public places without having their health affected vs people having the right to do something just cause they feel like it

and what about my arguement about music in bars or clubs?  that's ok?
I'm the Anti-Christ. You got me in a vendetta kind of mood.

The BIGSTUD

You are wrong. Clubs are made specifically for playing music. The drinking, etc, are extra benefits.

Bars are made so you can go drink alcohol.

If there was a building made specifically so people could go and do nothing but smoke, then it would be stupid to ban smoking there because only smokers go there. But smokers and non-smokers alike want to go to bars, and drink.

NO ONE is going to go to a club if they don't enjoy the music playing, and it bothers them. All clubs do it.
Calling it right on the $ since day one.
Just pointing laughing, and living it up while watching the Miami Heat stink it up.

ice grillin you

unless you are actually claiming that the most likely scenario is absolutely no change in the bottom line whatsoever

thats exactly what im claiming...the plus minus difference is negligible

smokers dont stop going to bars because they have to smoke outside

and if you wanna say it helps business then thats even more reason to have smoking bans
i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

Wingspan

Quote from: ice grillin you on June 15, 2006, 04:09:45 PM
don't go to a place that allows smoking if it bothers you

every person should have the right to go to public places without having their health affected vs people having the right to do something just cause they feel like it

while the premise is true...bars and restaurants are not public places. they are private establishements that invite the general public to patronize.
Connection Problems

Sorry, SMF was unable to connect to the database. This may be caused by the server being busy. Please try again later.

SunMo

Quote from: Bunkley78 on June 15, 2006, 04:13:22 PM
You are wrong. Clubs are made specifically for playing music. The drinking, etc, are extra benefits.

Bars are made so you can go drink alcohol.

If there was a building made specifically so people could go and do nothing but smoke, then it would be stupid to ban smoking there because only smokers go there. But smokers and non-smokers alike want to go to bars, and drink.

NO ONE is going to go to a club if they don't enjoy the music playing, and it bothers them. All clubs do it.

you're arguing the semanitcs of what clubs and bars are for.  i could easily combat that by talking about bars that have bands play, but i won't.  that proves you know that you have no arguement, so that's fine with me.
I'm the Anti-Christ. You got me in a vendetta kind of mood.

PoopyfaceMcGee

Quote from: Bunkley78 on June 15, 2006, 04:13:22 PM
You are wrong. Clubs are made specifically for playing music. The drinking, etc, are extra benefits.

Bars are made so you can go drink alcohol.

If there was a building made specifically so people could go and do nothing but smoke, then it would be stupid to ban smoking there because only smokers go there. But smokers and non-smokers alike want to go to bars, and drink.

NO ONE is going to go to a club if they don't enjoy the music playing, and it bothers them. All clubs do it.

They should ban white men dancing at clubs, because it endangers the health of other people dancing.

ice grillin you

and what about my arguement about music in bars or clubs?

outside of marilyn manson music never killed anyone
i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

SunMo

it's bad for my health.  it can damage my ear drums. 
I'm the Anti-Christ. You got me in a vendetta kind of mood.

The BIGSTUD

Club is a general term. I'd have no problem banning loud music in strip clubs, if it really bothers people. People go there to look at naked women, not listen to music.

But a CLUB is made so you can listen to music. They wouldn't exist without it. It would just become a bar if there was no music/dancing.
Calling it right on the $ since day one.
Just pointing laughing, and living it up while watching the Miami Heat stink it up.

ice grillin you

it can damage my ear drums

can it...probably

does it...no
i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

PoopyfaceMcGee

So, anything a person does that may somehow hurt others using the support of politically-charged, sketchy science but certainly does annoy them should be banned/illegal?

I guess that pretty much bans IGY from life.  Thanks for playing, buddy!