Sixers offseason

ice grillin you · May 25, 2006, 05:01:49 PM

a comma will bring you both

PoopyfaceMcGee · May 25, 2006, 05:32:36 PM

Quote from: Wingspan on May 25, 2006, 05:01:06 PM
i wish there was a way to get Allen Ray and Ray Allen.

word up diggity dawg d00d

The BIGSTUD · May 25, 2006, 06:30:17 PM

I'd definitely deal Sammy for Harrington. What a steal what would be. If you do that, and you can deal Webber, then I think it might be better to keep AI. You'd have a pretty good team with AI, Iguodala, Harrington, and Green, plus whoever we get at 13.

Rome · May 25, 2006, 06:39:04 PM

Quote from: FFatPatt on May 25, 2006, 05:32:36 PM
Quote from: Wingspan on May 25, 2006, 05:01:06 PM
i wish there was a way to get Allen Ray and Ray Allen.

word up diggity dawg d00d

Wow... that was painful.

reese125 · May 25, 2006, 07:18:58 PM

You'd have a pretty good team with AI, Iguodala, Harrington, and Green, plus whoever we get at 13.

first off, there is nobody at 13 in this draft that is coming in here and making an impact 1st year. secondly, that team you just listed above made it a complete wash with the sub of Harrington for Webber. Now your back to square one again or worse. Your boy has to go to get multiple players or future picks

The BIGSTUD · May 25, 2006, 07:25:42 PM

Quote from: reese125 on May 25, 2006, 07:18:58 PM
You'd have a pretty good team with AI, Iguodala, Harrington, and Green, plus whoever we get at 13.

first off, there is nobody at 13 in this draft that is coming in here and making an impact 1st year. secondly, that team you just listed above made it a complete wash with the sub of Harrington for Webber. Now your back to square one again or worse. Your boy has to go to get multiple players or future picks

Someone at 13 will have an impact his first year. No question about it. Whether it's starting or off the bench they'll have an impact.

Secondly, Harrington for Webber isn't a wash. In case you forgot, Webber sucks now and can't do anything, and Harrington is a better player. Unless you haven't watched Harrington play, which is the assumption here.

ice grillin you · May 25, 2006, 09:10:10 PM

first off, there is nobody at 13 in this draft that is coming in here and making an impact 1st year

very true...in fact there arent many top five players this year that are going to contribute right away...but...the sixers can get someone at 13 who will be a part of the rebuilding process and become a good nba starter in a few years...which is why position doesnt matter at this point...its all about getting the best player available

Rome · May 25, 2006, 10:00:18 PM

The last two #13 picks have been Sebastian Telfair & Sean May.

PhillyPhreak54 · May 25, 2006, 10:21:00 PM

Kobe and Richard Jefferson were also 13th picks..

reese125 · May 25, 2006, 10:26:14 PM

Webber sucks now and can't do anything, and Harrington is a better player. Unless you haven't watched Harrington play, which is the assumption here.

Bunkley, as much as you want me to argue here to this ridiculous statement.......please will ya

ice grillin you · May 25, 2006, 10:27:23 PM

if youre smart you will do like me and not respond to dook anymore

The BIGSTUD · May 25, 2006, 10:48:59 PM

Quote from: reese125 on May 25, 2006, 10:26:14 PM
Webber sucks now and can't do anything, and Harrington is a better player. Unless you haven't watched Harrington play, which is the assumption here.

Bunkley, as much as you want me to argue here to this ridiculous statement.......please will ya

Ridiculous how? The fact that Webber only shows up 1 in every 5 ames, the fact that he's strictly a jump shooter now who can't even shoot, the fact that he doesn't play defense or the fact that he's slow and lazy?

Don't give me Webber and Harrington are a wash. Not to mention Harrington is only 26 and he's getting better and better each year.

reese125 · May 25, 2006, 11:02:17 PM

if ignorance is bliss, you must be the happiest person on earth. God bless you

The BIGSTUD · May 25, 2006, 11:05:26 PM

That's what I thought. No argument.

But this little argument(even though you never brought anything to the table) is useless. It doesn't matter if Harrington and Webber are a wash even though Harrington's a better player right now.

Did you even read what I posted? You trade Sammy for Harrington, and then you deal Webber.

Sammy has pretty much contributed nothing to the Sixers this season, so Harrington's a steal. Whatever you get back for Webber is going to bring someone who can contribute, plus you have the 13th overall pick.

The Sixers are clearly a better team after these moves. Still not good enough to contend, but better.

But if you'd like to actually contribute to the debate and maybe explain why you think Webber brings equally as much to the table, then please do. If not, you are just wasting my time. Or you can be a whiny girl like IGY and hide in your corner, because you can't handle the a message board debate.

reese125 · May 26, 2006, 08:20:47 AM

From the Stepen A article this morning:

"We've got some good young players on this team," King said. "I'm confident we'll get better, that next season will be better than last season. The thing is we have to be committed on the defensive side of the ball. We've got to make that a focus on this team. If we do that then we'll be fine."

Man, if I had a dollar for every time this f-in guy says this.