Main Menu

Mocks

Started by Tomahawk, March 15, 2006, 12:57:53 PM

Previous topic - Next topic
Print
Go Down Pages 1 ... 32 33 34 35 36 ... 58
User actions

pinoyboy2pt0

#495
April 19, 2006, 01:54:15 PM
I'm just using Shanny logic here.  Dante's knee got shreded and went for a 2, and this is "Coach Teflon" we're talking about here.  They also have 2 3's (68 & 93).
Pass.  Pass. Pass. PUNT.  No pro bowl WR's.  Pass. Pass. Pass. PUNT.  Retarded special teams.  Pass. Pass. Pass. PUNT.  "I've got to do a better job."  Pass. Pass. Pass. PUNT.  Running game shines for 3 plays. Pass. Pass. Pass. PUNT.  No adjustments anywhere.  Pass.  Pass. Pass. PUNT.  (repeat)

PoopyfaceMcGee

#496
April 19, 2006, 01:57:16 PM
Quote from: pinoyboy2pt0 on April 19, 2006, 01:54:15 PM
They also have 2 3's (68 & 93).

OK, just realized this myself...  I though Denver got the compensatory pick in the 3rd, which was why they still had two 3rd rounders, but the Jets got that 3rd round compensatory pick... so, this page is wrong:
Denver pick tracker

But this page is right:
3rd round pick tracker, accurately shows #93 to Atlanta


EDIT: ...and now the first link is fixed too.  The NFL is farging with my head, man!

NGM

#497
April 19, 2006, 02:02:37 PM
Quote from: FFatPatt on April 19, 2006, 01:57:16 PM
Quote from: pinoyboy2pt0 on April 19, 2006, 01:54:15 PM
They also have 2 3's (68 & 93).

OK, just realized this myself...  I though Denver got the compensatory pick in the 3rd, which was why they still had two 3rd rounders, but the Jets got that 3rd round compensatory pick... so, this page is wrong:
Denver pick tracker

But this page is right:
3rd round pick tracker, accurately shows #93 to Atlanta


EDIT: ...and now the first link is fixed too.  The NFL is farging with my head, man!

At least you did the work.  I just looked it up and reported what I saw. 

I didn't think compensatory picks were allowed to be traded.  ???
Fletch:  Can I borrow your towel for a sec? My car just hit a water buffalo.

PoopyfaceMcGee

#498
April 19, 2006, 02:15:21 PM
Quote from: NGM on April 19, 2006, 02:02:37 PM
I didn't think compensatory picks were allowed to be traded.  ???

They're not.  I was thinking Denver traded their own 3rd rounder to Atlanta, but acquired the new (and better) 3rd rounder from San Fran, and retained their compensatory pick... but they didn't have a compensatory pick in the 3rd.

They did last year.  They used it to select Maurice Clarett.

PhillyPhanInDC

#499
April 19, 2006, 02:23:38 PM Last Edit: April 19, 2006, 02:54:12 PM by PhillyPhaninDC
The trade gives the Broncos better picks than the Birds in both* the third and fourth rounds*, which would trump anything we would offer the Packers pick-wise (no way do the Birds offer more than the value of a third). I don't think it matters, since the Walker talk was/is almost 100% assured to be bullshtein. I seriously doubt the Broncos did this to jockey position for Walker, but the possibility is there I suppose.



*I am FF's bitch.
"The very existence of flamethrowers proves that some time, somewhere, someone said to themselves, "You know, I want to set those people over there on fire, but I'm just not close enough to get the job done.""  R.I.P George.

PoopyfaceMcGee

#500
April 19, 2006, 02:27:34 PM
Quote from: PhillyPhaninDC on April 19, 2006, 02:23:38 PM
The trade gives the Broncos better picks than the Birds in both the third and fourth rounds

Wrong.

3rd
68. Denver
76. Philadelphia
93. Denver

4th
108. Philadelphia
116. Philadelphia
119. Denver
126. Denver
127. Philadelphia
130. Denver (compensatory)

PhillyPhanInDC

#501
April 19, 2006, 02:52:07 PM
Quote from: FFatPatt on April 19, 2006, 02:27:34 PM
Quote from: PhillyPhaninDC on April 19, 2006, 02:23:38 PM
The trade gives the Broncos better picks than the Birds in both the third and fourth rounds

Wrong.

3rd
68. Denver
76. Philadelphia
93. Denver

4th
108. Philadelphia
116. Philadelphia
119. Denver
126. Denver
127. Philadelphia
130. Denver (compensatory)

Exactly my point. It gets so old proving you wrong all the time.
"The very existence of flamethrowers proves that some time, somewhere, someone said to themselves, "You know, I want to set those people over there on fire, but I'm just not close enough to get the job done.""  R.I.P George.

Dillen

#502
April 19, 2006, 02:53:31 PM
Quote from: FFatPatt on April 19, 2006, 02:27:34 PM
Wrong.

3rd
68. Denver
76. Philadelphia
93. Denver

4th
108. Philadelphia
116. Philadelphia
119. Denver
126. Denver
127. Philadelphia
130. Denver (compensatory)
The point is, if we offer 108 or 116 Denver will offer 93.

PoopyfaceMcGee

#503
April 19, 2006, 02:57:33 PM
Denver does not have better picks in the 4th, so you worded your statement poorly.  Very poorly.

P.S.  Have you ever actually proved anyone wrong except yourself?  No.

PhillyPhanInDC

#504
April 19, 2006, 03:03:03 PM
It was a joke.

P.S. Go back and look my original post.

P.S.S. Look at when it was edited.

P.S.S.S. I heart you.
"The very existence of flamethrowers proves that some time, somewhere, someone said to themselves, "You know, I want to set those people over there on fire, but I'm just not close enough to get the job done.""  R.I.P George.

PoopyfaceMcGee

#505
April 19, 2006, 03:05:32 PM
I heart you too.

P.S.  Sorry, since I turned off avatars, I keep confusing you with Philly Forever.  I guess you might want to distinguish your posts from his a little bit better.

P.P.S.  Let's see some mocks with San Fran picking at #22!

PhillyPhanInDC

#506
April 19, 2006, 03:10:02 PM Last Edit: April 19, 2006, 03:11:39 PM by PhillyPhaninDC
Quote from: FFatPatt on April 19, 2006, 03:05:32 PM
I heart you too.

P.S.  Sorry, since I turned off avatars, I keep confusing you with Philly Forever.  I guess you might want to distinguish your posts from his a little bit better.

P.P.S.  Let's see some mocks with San Fran picking at #22!

Die.

Better now?
"The very existence of flamethrowers proves that some time, somewhere, someone said to themselves, "You know, I want to set those people over there on fire, but I'm just not close enough to get the job done.""  R.I.P George.

PoopyfaceMcGee

#507
April 19, 2006, 03:13:20 PM
Yeah, that's what helped end the confusion.

Anyway, a lot of mocks had DeAngelo Williams, Laurence Maroney, or LenDale going to the Broncos at #22, and I suppose it's conceivable that the 49ers could also be looking RB with that pick.

PhillyPhanInDC

#508
April 19, 2006, 03:35:00 PM
I would imagine the Niners are pretty happy with Barlow and Gore, hell, Hicks isn't terrible. I would think they would go with LB, DE, or a safety in the tenty-two spot. It also allows them to some flex at six as well.

DraftDaddy blurb:

Quote
Breaking News: Trade with the Denver Broncos nets the San Francisco 49ers No. 22 overall pick.

The Niners apparently are angling to pick up one of the top outside linebackers in a linebacker-rich draft at the No. 22 slot with the assumption that Ohio State product A.J. Hawk - generally considered the top linebacker prospect available - will not last past the first five picks.
"The very existence of flamethrowers proves that some time, somewhere, someone said to themselves, "You know, I want to set those people over there on fire, but I'm just not close enough to get the job done.""  R.I.P George.

The BIGSTUD

#509
April 19, 2006, 04:38:49 PM
So maybe the Niners initiated this deal after all.
Calling it right on the $ since day one.
Just pointing laughing, and living it up while watching the Miami Heat stink it up.
Print
Go Up Pages 1 ... 32 33 34 35 36 ... 58
User actions