2006 Free Agent Tracker - Offense

Started by PhillyPhreak54, February 14, 2006, 09:30:14 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

dis12

Packers | Team will not trade J. Walker
Tue, 28 Mar 2006 12:11:26 -0800

ESPNews reports the Green Bay Packers will not trade WR Javon Walker.


price for Moulds just went up >:(

C6 at the WAC

*** SPD ***

PoopyfaceMcGee

#721
Quote from: dis12 on March 28, 2006, 04:03:50 PM
price for Moulds just went up >:(

How do you figure?

The difference is that Walker's due about $1m this year in salary, but Moulds is due $7.1 million.  The Bills will cut Moulds, while the Packers can afford to play hardball with Walker.

ice grillin you

walker also is not a solution for this year...where as if you get moulds you get him to make a run at it all in the next two years max

walker would be an investment for the future
i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

dis12

Quote from: FFatPatt on March 28, 2006, 04:09:56 PM
Quote from: dis12 on March 28, 2006, 04:03:50 PM
price for Moulds just went up >:(

How do you figure?
The difference is that Walker's due less than $700k this year in salary, but Moulds is due $7.1 million.  The Bills will cut Moulds, while the Packers can afford to play hardball with Walker.

less high-profile WR on the market.
C6 at the WAC

*** SPD ***

PoopyfaceMcGee

Moulds contract demands will be no different either way.  If anything, you should be happy, because if the Eagles think Walker is not a possibility, and they would really like to get a top proven receiver, then their value of Moulds might have just gone up.

PhillyGirl

QuoteTUESDAY, March 28, 2006, 12:20 p.m.
By Bob McGinn
Walker 'not coming back' to Packers

Green Bay - What part of no don't the Green Bay Packers understand?

That's what Charles Goldsmith, Javon Walker's stepfather, wanted to know when he emphatically stated in a telephone interview this morning with the Journal Sentinel that the wide receiver will not ever play for the team again.

No amount of money, the passage of time or the possible retirement of quarterback Brett Favre, his adversary, will change Walker's mind, according to Goldsmith. He told general manager Ted Thompson in a 30-minute conversation Jan. 20 that his stepson was through with the Packers, but based on recent published comments from Thompson and coach Mike McCarthy, Goldsmith detected hope within the organization that the situation could be rectified.

"I wish this could have worked out better but he's not coming back," Goldsmith said. "He has so much animosity regarding Green Bay, it's ridiculous."

Goldsmith and his wife, Bernita, were in Green Bay this morning working with a real-estate agent. He said Walker's home in Green Bay, which he purchased from former Packers defensive end Jamal Reynolds about two years ago, will be on the market by Wednesday.

Walker has one year remaining on his original five-year contract with the Packers at a base salary of $1.15 million. He underwent reconstructive knee surgery Oct. 7.

According to Goldsmith, Walker has spent the off-season back and forth between Houston and Tallahassee, Fla., where he was back attending classes at Florida State. Goldsmith said his stepson is ahead of schedule in his rehabilitation.

Thompson has denied a request by Walker's agent, Kennard McGuire, seeking permission to shop his client.
"Oh, yeah. They'll still boo. They have to. They're born to boo. Just now, they'll only boo with two Os instead of like four." - Larry Andersen

Dillen

Raiders | Contract update: Lekkerkerker
Tue, 28 Mar 2006 21:57:38 -0800

Oakland Raiders OT Brad Lekkerkerker signed a one-year contract with a base salary of $350,000 in 2006.

BigEd76

Cool last name.  12 letters and only 4 are different...

dis12

here's another player we won't get ($$$)

Eagles | Team drawing interest from Faine
Wed, 29 Mar 2006 05:29:48 -0800

Bob Grotz, of the Daily Times, reports Cleveland Browns OC Jeff Faine has some interest in joining the Philadelphia Eagles. The Browns gave Faine permission to seek a trade after they signed OC LeCharles Bentley. Faine's current contract runs through 2009. The Browns almost certainly would be seeking a first-day draft pick for Faine.


C6 at the WAC

*** SPD ***

PoopyfaceMcGee

Trading a first-day pick for Jeff Faine would be preposterous.

PhillyPhreak54

Getting Jeff Faine at all would be preposterous.

He sucks.

There are LBs who are bigger than him.

SunMo

i thought he was great in the original Star Trek pilot episode
I'm the Anti-Christ. You got me in a vendetta kind of mood.

ice grillin you

The Browns almost certainly would be seeking won't get a first-day draft pick for Faine.


i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

SunMo

QuoteSaints | C. Horn agrees to two-year deal
Thu, 30 Mar 2006 10:48:31 -0800

NewOrleansSaints.com reports the New Orleans Saints have agreed to terms with free agent WR Chris Horn (Chiefs) on a two-year deal. Financial terms were not disclosed.

zLOL!11!!, that's gonna be so confusing for Drew Brees.  the coach is gonna be liek, "Throw it to Horn!!"  and Drew's gonna be liek, "Which one?!?!!?1"  Then'll he'll get sacked from behind a be paralyzed for the rest of his life.

good times.
I'm the Anti-Christ. You got me in a vendetta kind of mood.

rjs246

Quote from: Sun_Mo on March 30, 2006, 01:55:58 PM
zLOL!11!!, that's gonna be so confusing for Drew Brees. the coach is gonna be liek, "Throw it to Horn!!" and Drew's gonna be liek, "Which one?!?!!?1" Then'll he'll get sacked from behind a be paralyzed for the rest of his life.

good times.

There is so much good work in this post I don't know where to begin. The question mark followed by a '1' is fantastic.

C+
Is rjs gonna have to choke a bitch?

Let them eat bootstraps.