2006 Point & Laugh at the taterskins thread

Started by PoopyfaceMcGee, February 02, 2006, 09:51:31 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

rjs246

AAAHHHHAHAHAHAHAHahAhAHHAhAhAhahHahaHAahAH!

A sixth rounder?! That's fargign hilarious.
Is rjs gonna have to choke a bitch?

Let them eat bootstraps.

ice grillin you

and in a few years....

campbell   (2) firsts--------->cut
i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous

Mad-Lad

the biggest signing for the skins this offseason is the offensive coordinator from KC.

Wingspan

Quote from: rjs246 on March 17, 2006, 02:54:35 PM
Wingspan, this is where I hate this kind of comparison. If Alexander runs for 1000 more yards than Westbrook, scores 10 more TDs but has 30 less catches with 300 less yards does that somehow make them or close to it? Not remotely. A RB catching a bunch of passes but rushing inconsistently at best doesn't even begin to approximate a RB who rushes for 1600, 1700 or 1800 yards with 15-25 TDs. Even if the 1700 yard back only catches 30 passes. The two aren't even comparable.

McNabb and Hasselbeck ARE comparable. 20-30 TDs. 3000-4000 yards. McNabb adds the ability to evade the rush, but put him behind Seattle's line and he wouldn't have to do that as much. McNabb is far more talented, but their abilities as QBs aren't that far apart. Certainly not as far apart as Westbrook's and Alexander's.

look past the stats as well. which is 5 td span is better, 4 in one game, one in the next. or 2-2-1. we all know stats dont tell an accurate story.

the TD passes may be similar, but when are those TDs thrown? etc...etc...

i dont disagree, and you could debate the hasselbeck/alexander vs mcnabb/westbrook all day.
Connection Problems

Sorry, SMF was unable to connect to the database. This may be caused by the server being busy. Please try again later.

PoopyfaceMcGee

Quote from: Mad-Lad on March 17, 2006, 03:51:25 PM
the biggest signing for the skins this offseason is the offensive coordinator from KC.

Nope.  Todd Collins.

Mad-Lad


Feva

Quote from: ice grillin you on March 17, 2006, 03:22:44 PM
and in a few years....

campbell   (2) firsts--------->cut

And the even funnier thing about it is Gibbs will give him about 6-9 games and then he'll bury Campbell the whole time just like he did Ramsey.
"Now I'm completing up the other half of that triangle" - Emmitt Smith on joining Troy Aikman and Michael Irvin in the Hall of Fame

"If you have sex with a prostitute against her will, is that considered rape or shoplifting?" -- 2 Live Stews

PoopyfaceMcGee

And then they'll bet the farm on another crap-ass QB.  Rinse.  Repeat.

MDS

back to the basics:

mark schlereth makes me sick topic:
QuoteI was just watching ESPN news and he is talking about how since the Cowboys signed T.O they are the best team pound for pound in the NFC east. He did say the taterskins improved greatly during this offseason, but it seems like he isnt a taterskins fan the way he was talking.

he doesnt think the taterskins are the bestest team evaaaar therefore he is a moron
Zero hour, Michael. It's the end of the line. I'm the firstborn. I'm sick of playing second fiddle. I'm always third in line for everything. I'm tired of finishing fourth. Being the fifth wheel. There are six things I'm mad about, and I'm taking over.

MDS

QuoteWhat job do I love? I don't work for the taterskins or Dan Snyder. If it makes you feel better to assume I can appreciate what a fine owner he is and so doing must mean I work for him, that's your fatal flaw, not mine. At no point did I suggest he has been a perfect owner. No owner is perfect. He is, however, the best owner there is because he embodies EXACTLY what an owner should be.

He provides for his organization at a level no one else can compete with -- or more, that no one else has chosen to compete with.

Now, I don't hold it against him he fired people who couldn't use a computer when he came on board in 1999. In fact, I'm pretty sure all of us would have walked in to taterskins Park back then and been astounded that there were two computers in the building and the organization was in such a shambles.

Snyder fixed that, making taterskins Park a technological marvel and hiring the types of people qualified to do that. That's good ownership, even if it hurts a few people he fired. On top of that, many of these people in very key positions had a DIRECT line to the press. You can trace the lineage of some of our problems with the media to the initial termination of just about every close contact developed by reporters at the Park over the years.

The free agency period of 2000 is most routinely used to diminish Snyder in some way, largely because people are factually inaccurate about how they portray it. Like you here. The 6-2 taterskins of 2000 didn't appear to be splintered, right? The defense that ranked 30th the year before improved to fourth in 2000 as a direct reflection of the offseason, yet, you'd consider this a flaw? Only when we had injuries on offense and some guys turned out to have had CAREER years the previous year on offense did we begin to fail. The moves themselves were very successful in doing exactly what they were supposed to do.

The reason Marty was let go was the public, joint statement that he wouldn't relinquish his GM duties, but, since Marty didn't actually HAVE GM duties, he merely assumed them and Snyder allowed it for a year, tells you the real reason was Jimmy Raye and terrible coaching by Marty. Had Marty agreed to hire a competent offensive mind he'd probably STILL be here. That Marty ONLY got that team to respond to him by largely uniting it behind a hatred of him also was a poor reflection on the future. That team would have had to be destroyed to ultimately succeed for Marty because most of them hated him and instead of breaking them, he caved to them and played to that hatred.

Ultimately though, an owner is judged by the intelligence behind his decisions at the time they are made. Spurrier was a great hire that would have been made by any owner. Marty was a good hire. Gibbs was a good hire. If Gibbs fails, it won't be because Snyder made a mistake. It'll be because Gibbs was unable to get the job done. And, if Gibbs is successful, it will be because Gibbs was successful.

All the owner can do within that is to provide for his football people and give them what they tell him they need. Snyder does that like NO other. We get EXACTLY what we want. If there's a mistake in what we want, the blame is on the people making the decision as to who we want, not on the owner who allows the money to make such moves happen.

:puke
Zero hour, Michael. It's the end of the line. I'm the firstborn. I'm sick of playing second fiddle. I'm always third in line for everything. I'm tired of finishing fourth. Being the fifth wheel. There are six things I'm mad about, and I'm taking over.

Geowhizzer


phattymatty

being a computer wiz is the same as being a gm, obviously.

PoopyfaceMcGee

QuoteSpurrier was a great hire that would have been made by any owner.

Incorrect on both counts.

Catapult

I don't even want to know who wrote that $@#%&^ (and I have a feeling I know what mouth-breather wrote that)...

There aren't enough tank shells in the world to blow that out of the water.
Please select your blitz package:  Zone, Darth, Mad Tiger, Train Wreck, Monster, Kitchen Sink, Jail Break, or Bench Press (new!)

ice grillin you

Spurrier was a great hire

south carolina is very happy indeed
i can take a phrase thats rarely heard...flip it....now its a daily word

igy gettin it done like warrick

im the board pharmacist....always one step above yous